Dr. Sam Gipp - Comparing Bible Versions

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 319

  • @missdana296
    @missdana296 6 років тому +34

    I am mentally disabled, but I can understand the KJV, and I prefer it, because after researching all of the translations, the KJV Bible makes me feel safe with God. If I can do it, there is no excuse for anyone else. Just my opinion.

    • @jasonb.6623
      @jasonb.6623 5 років тому +1

      If you are accepting Sam Gipp’s teachings like drinking kool aid with no critical thinking, you are mentally disables

    • @jasonb.6623
      @jasonb.6623 4 роки тому +1

      PointOfPeripety A single typo from a post made on a phone does not negate the fact that Sam Gipp teaches utter nonsense and the people who follow him are gullible sheep. Nice try, though

    • @missdana296
      @missdana296 4 роки тому

      @PointOfPeripety Thank you sweetheart. I hope you have a better life than me. God loves, you.

    • @johnbecht3158
      @johnbecht3158 4 роки тому +1

      Jason B. It’s more of a presentation of raw data than it is a teaching. Buying into a lecture on meteorology isn’t the same thing as finding out the weather by walking outside yourself.

    • @TommyB4Jesus
      @TommyB4Jesus 3 роки тому +1

      @@missdana296 Love you Dana and God bless you... Nevermind the Scoffers... Christ died for their sins too... Let's Keep our minds and Hearts on Christ above.
      See you in Heaven soon enough! :)

  • @Shrimpwagon
    @Shrimpwagon 9 років тому +5

    Oh wow, I had Psalms 23 on my heart all week

  • @bstein9500
    @bstein9500 8 місяців тому +2

    The new Bible versions are like the latest iphone - good until the next one comes along. None of them can be completely believed.
    Gen 3:1 ...Yea, hath God said,... ~ The serpent in the garden of Eden.

  • @monicaporta7759
    @monicaporta7759 2 роки тому +4

    So his idea to convince other of what Bible version is correct is to belittle someone's IQ? I literally quit listening to what he had to say after his comment. How can a pastor expect to have people want to hear what they have to say when they demean anyone who questions them.

    • @poolahpot
      @poolahpot 11 місяців тому

      Check out g. Riplinger
      Humble teacher

    • @EdwinDekker71
      @EdwinDekker71 11 місяців тому +1

      If you stopped listening, proverbs 18: 13 applies

    • @monicaporta7759
      @monicaporta7759 11 місяців тому

      @@EdwinDekker71 I guess he should be following Eph 4:29 first as a pastor

  • @emiljohann88
    @emiljohann88 Рік тому +4

    I have a UA-cam playlist of 200 videos that support the KJV

  • @QuentinDunmore
    @QuentinDunmore 9 років тому +3

    Brother Gipp, you are so wonderful in your studies, I can't wait for you to return to Bible Baptist Church in Grove City.

  • @hopeseeker97
    @hopeseeker97 6 років тому +9

    They have even changed the kjv. Make sure it is an "authorized" KJV.

    • @TheBluegoatman
      @TheBluegoatman 4 роки тому +1

      Who authorized it?

    • @TheBrownsberg
      @TheBrownsberg 4 роки тому +3

      @@TheBluegoatman God.

    • @TheBluegoatman
      @TheBluegoatman 4 роки тому +2

      @@TheBrownsberg show chapter and verse on that. Not something we have to read in too. Actual verses where it says God authorized King James to make the only English speaking bible.

    • @TheBluegoatman
      @TheBluegoatman 4 роки тому

      @@TheBrownsberg I'll be honest though I like your original reply better. Especially considering the source of the KJVO movement.

    • @TheBrownsberg
      @TheBrownsberg 4 роки тому +1

      @@TheBluegoatman That was a misstake, the wrong ones are inspire by Satan. I think the explanation is pretty clear. If you think that leaves room for doubt than you are a reprobate man. Repent or go to hell.

  • @livingbranches777
    @livingbranches777 Рік тому +4

    To read the KJB is to be comforted by the Holy Ghost.

    • @henrylaurel1188
      @henrylaurel1188 11 місяців тому

      The Holy Spirit has always been the comforter. The KJV is just an imperfect uninspired translation. Certainly not the comforter. What did people read before 1611? More deception and stupidity from a KJV idolater.

  • @chrismichels6987
    @chrismichels6987 10 років тому +3

    In the 40th minute, Dr. Gipp is quick to point out that there is "no Greek authority" for the NIV's translation of Aramaic rather than Hebrew. Is he consistent with that standard when it comes to comes the KJV's translation of Revelation 16:5 saying "and shalt be" which also has no Greek authority?

    • @CopperheadSysop
      @CopperheadSysop 9 років тому +3

      He's being deceptive because he didn't even say what the Koine Greek word for Aramaic was.

  • @MT-if8ye
    @MT-if8ye 9 років тому +1

    What about Matthew 24:36 where KJV took out words from the original Greek text?

    • @nunesandrew4198
      @nunesandrew4198 9 років тому

      +Mike Tee Compare the KJV AND THE NIV with this ;) and see which one is more accurate 4012 [e]
      36 Peri
      36 Περὶ
      36 concerning
      36 1161 [e]
      de
      δὲ
      moreover
      3588 [e]
      tēs
      τῆς
      the
      2250 [e]
      hēmeras
      ἡμέρας
      day
      1565 [e]
      ekeinēs
      ἐκείνης
      that
      2532 [e]
      kai
      καὶ
      and
      5610 [e]
      hōras
      ὥρας ,
      hour
      3762 [e]
      oudeis
      οὐδεὶς
      no one
      1492 [e]
      oiden
      οἶδεν ,
      knows
      3761 [e]
      oude
      οὐδὲ
      not even
      3588 [e]
      hoi
      οἱ
      the
      32 [e]
      angeloi
      ἄγγελοι
      angels
      3588 [e]
      tōn
      τῶν
      of the
      3772 [e]
      ouranōn
      οὐρανῶν ,
      heavens
      3761 [e]
      oude
      οὐδὲ
      nor
      3588 [e]
      ho

      the
      5207 [e]
      Huios
      Υἱός ,
      Son
      1487 [e]
      ei
      εἰ
      if
      3361 [e]

      μὴ
      not
      3588 [e]
      ho

      the
      3962 [e]
      Patēr
      Πατὴρ
      Father
      3441 [e]
      monos
      μόνος .
      only

    • @MT-if8ye
      @MT-if8ye 9 років тому +1

      +Leandro Melim The word "the Son" is missing in KJV

    • @knowingthisfirst9325
      @knowingthisfirst9325 8 років тому +1

      Which original Greek text would that happen to be?

    • @crippled82
      @crippled82 6 років тому +1

      Knowing this First
      WH and NA includes 'the Son', TR doesn't av it

    • @GodisGracious1031Ministries
      @GodisGracious1031Ministries 5 місяців тому

      Its not in the original text. the Corrupted ones added it. The "nor the Son" is in the other gospel.

  • @KJV7774
    @KJV7774 11 місяців тому +1

    Thank you

  • @legendofzeida2516
    @legendofzeida2516 Рік тому

    THANK YOU brother Gipp 🙏

  • @hopeseeker97
    @hopeseeker97 6 років тому +2

    Haven't heard the name Calvary for a very long time.

  • @charis128
    @charis128 6 років тому +1

    Luke 26:14 in the Catholic Bible says Hebraica (Hebrew in Latin) and in the English version, the word is Hebrew -- not Aramaic.

  • @Tracy-Inches
    @Tracy-Inches 5 років тому +1

    The last comment I see was 5 years ago, and my recent comments proves, people still do see

  • @ImaBeliever
    @ImaBeliever Рік тому +4

    Excellent! I couldn't help but laugh and then get disgusted and then felt heartbroken that many do not realize the gravity of choice-not doing comparisons.May the Lord have Mercy on their souls. May he open their eyes to the real and only Word of God- The King James Version.

    • @jimnesbitt8581
      @jimnesbitt8581  Рік тому +3

      I believe it is incumbent on every soul to seek out the truth with all your heart and soul... asking the Lord to show the truth... short of that there is no excuse for not finding the truth

    • @ImaBeliever
      @ImaBeliever Рік тому +1

      @@jimnesbitt8581 Can you explain to me about Isaiah 11:6 because many are saying it used to say-"And the lion shall lay down with the lamb."

    • @jimnesbitt8581
      @jimnesbitt8581  Рік тому +3

      All i know is every copy of King James I have, including one called "Pure Cambridge Text" all say wolf.

    • @henrylaurel1188
      @henrylaurel1188 11 місяців тому

      Where was the so called "pure word of God" before 1611? Something that cultist Sam Gipp could not answer. When he was exposed for the KJV only deceiver he is. Also which of the 10 revisions of the KJV is "pure"? Also where is the scripture that supports this KJV only teaching? There is not one. So the KJV only teaching has to be rejected for the deception and doctrine of devils that it is.

    • @GodisGracious1031Ministries
      @GodisGracious1031Ministries 5 місяців тому

      @@ImaBeliever Lies.

  • @saltyforjesus
    @saltyforjesus 8 років тому +1

    Thank you for sharing this! :)

  • @skippy8696
    @skippy8696 7 років тому +1

    Why is he wearing two watches?

    • @maddenus5023
      @maddenus5023 5 років тому

      Skippy One looks good the other works lol I don’t know.

    • @rlyle5804
      @rlyle5804 4 роки тому

      Some public speakers put one watch on the lectern (he may have forgot) to keep track of time so they dont have to look at their watch.

  • @maddenus5023
    @maddenus5023 5 років тому +1

    Gipp is great with this. For those newer to these studies be sure to check out his video series on “Big deal KJV” .com I don’t want to share the exact link to UA-cam for sake of their policies.

    • @SwollenostrichTM
      @SwollenostrichTM 2 роки тому +2

      And then when you’re done with that, check out the James white response videos by the same name where he shows the Gipp videos to be little more then pure historical fiction.

    • @waynerenee3809
      @waynerenee3809 Рік тому

      @@SwollenostrichTM KJV pawns all else, sorry bout it.

    • @SwollenostrichTM
      @SwollenostrichTM Рік тому

      @@waynerenee3809 did you mean Pwns all else? As in “pown/own” the internet term?

    • @waynerenee3809
      @waynerenee3809 Рік тому

      @@SwollenostrichTM Yeah if that means it’s far superior.

    • @SwollenostrichTM
      @SwollenostrichTM Рік тому +1

      @@waynerenee3809 I have no problem with people who prefer the kjv or even believe it’s the best Bible. The problem is men like Gipp completely distorting the facts of church history and textual history to make up a mythical version of the kjv or TR as the only real Bible and all other bibles are fake, or Alexandrian cult bibles, etc. He, and others, think nothing of slandering scholars and other lay Christians in a very prideful and uncharitable manner. And his slander is based on lies. If you’re relying on men like him for textual history, there’s no easy way to say you’ve been lied to. I’m sorry, but it’s true.

  • @swilderspin
    @swilderspin 7 місяців тому

    The strange thing is that he mostly doesn’t explain why there are differences. When the Greek in every version says “Hades” then surely you should translate it like that? The NRSV gives the best translation of 1Samuel 13.

  • @dennishagans6339
    @dennishagans6339 2 роки тому +2

    I am KJVO, I am also a seeker of the truth, and there are some things in my trusty beloved KJV that I cannot explain, I came across this some time ago, and there are some who tried to answer but the answers amount to a book, and they are long and drawn out like they are beating around the bush.
    here are just 10 of the 101 I cannot answer.
    1. Who incited David to count the fighting men of Israel?
    God did (2 Samuel 24: 1)
    Satan did (I Chronicles 21:1)
    2. In that count how many fighting men were found in Israel?
    Eight hundred thousand (2 Samuel 24:9)
    One million, one hundred thousand (I Chronicles 21:5)
    3. How many fighting men were found in Judah?
    Five hundred thousand (2 Samuel 24:9)
    Four hundred and seventy thousand (I Chronicles 21:5)
    4. God sent his prophet to threaten David with how many years of famine?
    Seven (2 Samuel 24:13)
    Three (I Chronicles 21:12)
    5. How old was Ahaziah when he began to rule over Jerusalem?
    Twenty-two (2 Kings 8:26)
    Forty-two (2 Chronicles 22:2)
    6. How old was Jehoiachin when he became king of Jerusalem?
    Eighteen (2 Kings 24:8)
    Eight (2 Chronicles 36:9)
    7. How long did he rule over Jerusalem?
    Three months (2 Kings 24:8)
    Three months and ten days (2 Chronicles 36:9)
    8. The chief of the mighty men of David lifted up his spear and killed how many men at one time?
    Eight hundred (2 Samuel 23:8)
    Three hundred (I Chronicles 11: 11)
    9. When did David bring the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem? Before defeating the Philistines or after?
    After (2 Samuel 5 and 6)
    Before (I Chronicles 13 and 14)
    10. How many pairs of clean animals did God tell Noah to take into the Ark?
    Two (Genesis 6:19, 20)
    Seven (Genesis 7:2). But despite this last instruction only two pairs went into the ark (Genesis 7:8-9)
    I came across this and it really bothers me because I just do not have the answers.
    if the enemies of God can find these then why have we not found them and dealt with them before the enemies found and posted them?

    • @jimnesbitt8581
      @jimnesbitt8581  2 роки тому +1

      Look up Bible Baptist Bookstore in Pensacola, order the mp3s of Dr. Ruckman teaching each of the books you mentioned, where he taught in the Pesacola Bible Institute... each mp3 lecture can be as much as 40 hours long...to cover one complete book of the Bible....
      other than Bro Gipp, Doctor Ruckman is the only one I listen to or trust to bring the truth

    • @ColonelEmpire
      @ColonelEmpire 2 роки тому +1

      Your copy and paste as well as your deception is very telling... You are not a Bible believer....though you falsely claim to be one. Every one of your silly "contradictions" are not contradictions *if* you keep the Bible in *CONTEXT*
      The easiest misunderstanding, of yours, (I COR. 2:14 is in effect here) to debunk is this:
      You said: "5. How old was Ahaziah when he began to rule over Jerusalem? Twenty-two (2 Kings 8:26) Forty-two (2 Chronicles 22:2)"
      Response: The answer is yes! Look up the word, and the practice, of "co-regent". The king's "mommy" was his boss. The "king" Ahaziah was controlled by his mother...a go-regent. BOTH ruled. The Bible is very thorough and very very precise. A king that is hen pecked and tied to his mommy's apron strings is not in power...but in name only. His mother was ruling through Ahaziah.
      II Kings 8:26 ".....And his mother's name was Athaliah, the daughter of Omri king of Israel."
      Learn to have faith in God....if you are saved. If you are not saved, well, get saved, or stay in your lane. You are clueless about the word of God.

    • @dennishagans6339
      @dennishagans6339 2 роки тому

      @@ColonelEmpire
      I posted 10 of 101 seeking simple answers to them, they are not mine, they come from Shabir Ally a muslim, and many are those who will be deceived and use them against us, like atheists, thinking they have this potent weapon that no one can answer.
      There are some answers such as "101 contradictions cleared up"
      The first answer is several paragraphs long. thus it is long-winded and drawn out and hardly simple.
      I posted them seeking someone to answer them, in simplicity. rather than with long-drawn-out beat around the bush answers.
      Many are those who can take a drop of knowledge and diffuse it into an ocean of verbosity. Mat 6:7

    • @ColonelEmpire
      @ColonelEmpire 2 роки тому

      @@dennishagans6339 I have dealt with God denying, Bible hating atheists that lie about God & the Bible and they come at the issue **JUST LIKE YOU DID** so forgive my taking you for one of them....
      Bible rejecting heretics (religious nuts as well as atheists) will always be here. Sometimes there are no *EASY* answers. *STUDY* is hard work. Memorization is hard work. Those are the facts that we all have to deal with and accept.
      I have answered all but 1 or 2 of the silly "contradictions" that are in your list that you borrowed 10 from. (I too have looked at the list from the internet) It is rather easy to answer all but a couple of those silly accusations. The main issue that the Bible rejecting fool has is *CONTEXT* They take the word of God out of *CONTEXT* and try to tie verses together that do not belong together. They will also try to tie verses into a contradiction without even considering the wording...
      Examples:
      I Kings 4:26 And Solomon had forty thousand stalls *OF* horses for his chariots, and twelve thousand horsemen.
      II Chronicles 9:25 And Solomon had four thousand stalls *FOR* horses and chariots, and twelve thousand horsemen; whom he bestowed in the chariot cities, and with the king at Jerusalem.
      **Emphasis mine**
      *OF* is not *FOR* **Context is king**
      Straining at a gnat (correcting God's words)
      Choking on a camel (correcting God's words)
      God's warning is threefold:
      **Beginning of the Bible**
      Deuteronomy 4:2 Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.
      **Middle of the Bible**
      Proverbs 30:5 Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him.
      Proverbs 30:6 Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar.
      **End of the Bible**
      Revelation 22:18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
      Revelation 22:19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
      The word of God should be reread and reread not rewritten. Live by faith in God and *not* an education nor intellect.

  • @rickfowler5342
    @rickfowler5342 2 роки тому +3

    Thanks for posting! Sure love and miss Brother Gipp! America is in a very sad state today. It's getting harder and harder to find someone who upholds, fights for, stands for and preserves the Word of God like he does! Thankful by God's Providence that the covenant of my church States that only the KJV will be read from the pulpit, because we unfortunately have a pastor who is a Bible corrector and critic rather than a Bible believer. I know God wants me to stand my ground and fight for this patch of lentils, so please pray I'll have the same courage David's mighty men had.

    • @jimnesbitt8581
      @jimnesbitt8581  2 роки тому

      Why are you wasting time and energy listening to someone who doesn't believe the word.... I've gone to just listening to Dr Ruckman Mp3s Bible Teaching where I know I'm getting the straight unredacted word of God.....plenty of this available online or at Bible Baptist Bookstore Pensacola

  • @enterprisebaptistchurch4432
    @enterprisebaptistchurch4432 10 років тому +15

    I noticed some people have very little understanding when it comes to new Bible versions. They want to call attention to additions of the KJV Bible. Studies for Truth asked about the different versions of the KJV. The fact is that there is only one version of the KJV. There are numerous editions but only one version. The revisions were needed to correct the problems that occurred due to there being no standardized spelling and so spelling was an issue that needed to be addressed. There were also problems that occurred due to printing errors that needed to be corrected. The apostate mind is unable to understand that their arguments regarding KJV revision have no relevance. The reason we believe the KJV is the pure and preserved word of God have nothing to do with revisions. It's due to the preservation of the manuscripts which are it's foundation, the authority on the KJV, The skill and scholarship put into it's development and the place of it's origins. It is deemed to be far more reliable and there is more study material available for the KJV than all the other versions combined. The apostate mind is unable to understand or perceive the truth because their mind is bound and their heart is hardened due to prolonged corruption. Let me point out the truth for those who have minds that have not been bound. -->
    1) The manuscripts which are the foundation for every new Bible in mass publication today are incomplete. There isn't a single one of them that exists that is complete. They have errors, blank spaces, corrections and read like a much corrected rough draft. The fact that they are incomplete is proof positive that they are not the perfect and preserved word of God.
    2) Of the incomplete Alaxandrain or Egyptian Texts there are only 2 somewhat complete and 17 all total. Most of them (15) are only bits and pieces.
    3) They come from Alexandria or Egypt which is a place of known corruption The line of manuscripts that were used as the foundation for the KJV come from Antioch, a place where the first Christian Church was established. It was evangelized by people such as the apostle Peter. It is the place where Christians were first called Christians.
    4) The organizations which translate texts which are formed from the corrupted Egyptian manuscripts (UBS/NA) both have an agreement in writing with the Vatican which insures that the texts must meet the requirements of the Catholic Church.
    5) There are 5000+ manuscripts from the area in and around Antioch and many of them have been preserved and are complete and perfect to the Jot and Tittle. Therefore, the Bible that is translated from these manuscripts can truly be called the pure and preserved word God and are in alignment with the promise and power of God to preserve His word perfectly. Again, this is the line of manuscripts which is the foundation for the KJV.
    6)The word of God, deity of Christ, and Bible doctrine is changed and or diminished in the New Bibles with an obvious slant toward the Catholic faith.
    7) There were more people in Biblical times corrupting the word of God and likewise today Bible prophesy tells us that in the end times men will not endure sound doctrine. That time is now.
    -->The apostate is unable to disprove even a single point. I have researched them all and can back up my data. The filthy false teacher prefers to change the subject and avoid the facts. Misdirection, lies, and wicked unfounded accusations are their only option. Their mind is bound and their heart is hardened so they can't understand or perceive the truth. I can't reach them. Only God is going to be able to help the filthy apostate. The apostate perverts don't mind that the money they spend on the new Bibles often go to corporations and people that peddle hard cor pornography. The apostates and many of their Bible publishers are perverts or filthy dreamers and they love the world so much that they cling to it and gnash their teeth in the face of God. Money is what's most important to them.

    • @enterprisebaptistchurch4432
      @enterprisebaptistchurch4432 9 років тому +1

      ***** That depends on what they disagree on and how much they know or if they refuse to examine the facts. Being an apostate doesn't mean a person is without hope. It simply means they have fallen away from the truth.

    • @enterprisebaptistchurch4432
      @enterprisebaptistchurch4432 9 років тому

      ***** Do you believe that Jesus can only be on one place at a time? Or perhaps, you believe that Jesus can't travel to two different places in a day. Jesus clearly decended and brought back those that were captive. I encourage you to continue in your studies. I know Jesus decended because He has allowed me to see His suffering there. You can choose to believe what you will. I am not sure that this is even something I would debate with you about. Here is a great study on the topic: www.compellingtruth.org/did-Jesus-go-to-hell.html..........Thank you for your comment. - Bro. Robert

    • @enterprisebaptistchurch4432
      @enterprisebaptistchurch4432 9 років тому +1

      First, that fact you believe you have power to judge salvation tells me that you are very confused. You have likely been sitting under the leadership of an apostate if you have leadership at all. Let me give you a tip. We are to judge everything but salvation with righteous judgment. Only God can judge salvation. Second, You have lowered yourself to become a Vatican Cult bible Troll. You talk about others being cultist but it is you that are the Catholic Cultist. Decent Christians broke away from the Catholic church centuries back and you want to lead them back to that filth. You could be doing much more positive things with your life. Third, and finally you mistakenly believe yourself to have authority to preach and teach the bible. You teach like a convict. You imagine that you have the ability and authority to correct to a duly licensed, educated, and authorized preacher of the gospel. You are as filthy as any creature that crawls the face of the earth. You reject the gospel and attack God called ministers for no good cause. I have more than 12 years of Bible college and numerous degrees, certificates, and awards. I teach with authority, decency, order, and care. I have forgotten more about the Bible then you will likely ever take time to learn. You appear to have no real Bible education and do not even know the truth let alone preach or teach it. If you decide you need help and want to learn the truth I am happy to teach you. If you want to teach apostasy on my streams I will block you and delete your posts. Trolls are not welcome.

    • @enterprisebaptistchurch4432
      @enterprisebaptistchurch4432 9 років тому

      We aren't going to be able to reach everyone with the truth. The Bible says that God causes people to believe a lie because of their filthy ways. These people would prefer to have a catholic cult bible that is owned, produced, and sold by hard core pornographers then a bible that has been preserved to the "Jot" and "Tittle" as God promised. I don't mind that because God explained that there would be people in the end times that would not endure sound doctrine. Even after he pours out his bowls of wrath they will still not repent. Let God be true and every man a liar. I say buy the truth and sell it not. Now some people would have you believe that any old bible is the truth. Thankfully God explains the truth so that we can recognize a lie. We know that God doesn't preserve part of his word. He preserves it all. As for the apostates who are teaching filth and lies on my stream you are not welcome. Trolls will be blocked and their posts deleted. It is for this reason alone that I hope the filthy apostates will take time to write lengthy responses. Eventually I will delete them all. I like to wait until they have invested a great deal of time so that in the end they find that there is no profit or gain. This is a biblical principal that they don't really understand. It's funny how they are full of insults and banter but don't have a shred of data to submit in support of their empty claims. They aren't even able to disprove a single word I wrote and I have had a lot to say. You apostates are a joke. Get yourself a KJV and read Mark 6:11 if you want to know how your story unfolds.

    • @classicnosh
      @classicnosh 8 років тому

      +godlytv - Do you know how illogical you just sounded. There are Mormons that believe, with all sincerity that the Book of Mormon is true. They like the KJV as well but you misinterpret God giving someone over to their own deceptions with God himself deceiving. God never lies. However, if you believe what you just uttered, how do you know that you're not the one deceived? What criteria do you use?

  • @thinkingevil
    @thinkingevil 11 місяців тому

    This guy is a crack up! Very enjoyable.

  • @davidbrock4104
    @davidbrock4104 5 років тому +5

    The issue is one of understanding. The KJV is a good translation. It is not however, inspired. Dr Gipp, strongly suggests that it is. Check out the John Ankerberg show. I love and use the KJV but I also use the NKJV, the MEV, which has the TR/Majority texts as their basis. I also use the ESV, NASB & others for comparison. I prefer the Majority texts & feel that the church fathers from the 200's to the 400's quoted them enough to validate the inclusion of the longer ending of Mark 16, 1John 5:7, etc, etc. I do not criticize Christians who use Alexandrian text versions though. It's disengenuous the way Dr Gipp is using words from the various versions in comparison with the KJV. Even having the NWT as a part of the discussion is completely over the top. In a true debate, he will lose

    • @rlyle5804
      @rlyle5804 4 роки тому

      Which version is inspired?

    • @ColonelEmpire
      @ColonelEmpire 2 роки тому

      The KJV is inspired

    • @davidbrock4104
      @davidbrock4104 2 роки тому

      @@ColonelEmpire No translation is directly inspired. Only the originals were, otherwise, there would be no textual variants and even the TR, etc that the KJV is based on has variants

    • @ColonelEmpire
      @ColonelEmpire 2 роки тому +2

      @@davidbrock4104 Your problem comes from your indoctrination away from Bible education. The King James Bible *IS* inspired because it is the word of God (Scripture):
      II Timothy 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
      II Timothy 3:17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.
      The King James Bible is the same Book as the Masoretic Text as well as the Textus Receptus.
      Your problem is that you have no faith or weak faith in God at best. God *IS* able to keep His words pure in *EVERY* generation, this generation included.
      Psalm 12:6 The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.
      Psalm 12:7 Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them *from this generation for ever* .
      Your puny god is impotent...
      **My God is OMNIPOTENT**
      Try having faith! Romans 10:17

    • @davidbrock4104
      @davidbrock4104 2 роки тому

      @@ColonelEmpire if you choose to ignore reality, that's on you. I believe in scripture, that it is infallible and inerrant, and that it was preserved. But you can't ignore the textual variants in the Greek editions of the TR. It doesn't mean scripture is not inerrant, etc but it does mean that translators have to decide what to do when translating from Greek to English. Read the KJV translators preface and their marginal notes. They faced the same issues. Sam Gipp has been shown this and he knows this, though he may be reluctant to admit it. There's nothing wrong with using the KJV if you want. It's a great translation, it just has some outdated words, phrases and idioms. It also has words whose definitions have completely changed meaning and this isn't readily obvious unless one is constantly checking the Strongs or equivalent.

  • @Tracy-Inches
    @Tracy-Inches 5 років тому +3

    I understand, and take to heart this teaching, but the laughing and poking fun does nothing for this service. Jesus I believe, correct me if I am wrong, never poked fun. I understand we are dealing with our flesh, but there must be a meekness, we must be meek in our approach and presentation in all ways of our lives.

  • @susyhebner1815
    @susyhebner1815 6 років тому +1

    That was awesome!!!

  • @studiesfortruth2956
    @studiesfortruth2956 10 років тому +5

    Let's compare the versions of the KJV.
    1 Corinthians 15:6 - (1611) AND that - (1769) AFTER that
    Ezekiel 48:8 - (1611) which THEY shall - (1769) which YE shall
    Jeremiah 51:30 - (1611) burnt THEIR dwelling places - (1769) burned HER dwellingplaces
    So, which KJV is the perfect one since just those three verses I've given show actual word changes that affect meaning? The KJVO says God's word is preserved perfectly in every single word of Scripture, but the KJV does not do that. Also, where was the perfect word before the KJV? The Textus Receptus you say? Well, the KJV was published in 1611, but the Textus Receptus wasn't done until 1633. There goes that argument.
    Also, using the NWT of the Jehovah's Witnesses and the NLT which isn't even a real translation (it's a paraphrase) is very dishonest. That's alarming when Christianity is a religion of truth.

    • @J0HNJ0RDAN
      @J0HNJ0RDAN 10 років тому +2

      I don't believe these are places where the Bible was translated differently (or revised) but are examples of printing errors, one word wrongly printed instead of another but what the translators intended is still known and so these errors could be corrected. It's not as if the translators used a different underlying text or changed the way in which they were translating.
      Why would there have to be a perfect Bible before 1611 for there to be one after 1611? But supposing there are errors in this particular translation of the Bible where then is the perfect word of God, now, in 1611, or before? Is there such a thing as a perfect Bible?

    • @SwollenostrichTM
      @SwollenostrichTM 2 роки тому +1

      @@J0HNJ0RDAN I’ll answer that question if you can demonstrate where the perfect Bible was before 1611

  • @panamajack5044
    @panamajack5044 5 років тому

    I respect this as i add it to understanding great way to look at the modern mega churches as well as small, this can help us to look at who is teaching us and what we are being fed and feeding on as we are still being treated as sheep instead of being turned into disciples .

  • @anonymousperson6462
    @anonymousperson6462 7 років тому

    Now compare versions of the Textus receptus bibles. See which verses the kjv revised. Might want to have Wycliffe as well, so one doesn't think kjv was the first to say certain words. Sometimes that's the case, while other times it's not.

    • @---zc4qt
      @---zc4qt 4 роки тому +3

      KJV Onlyists are unwilling to admit that there are SEVERAL editions ( Such as: -Stephanus, -Beza, -Elz., -Scholtz, and others.) of the so-called "Received Text".

  • @MitchellCH
    @MitchellCH 3 роки тому +1

    39:00 and we say that because the rock is Jesus Christ.
    Deuteronomy 32:3-4 (KJV)
    3 Because I will publish the name of the LORD: ascribe ye greatness unto our God.
    4 [He is] the Rock, his work [is] perfect: for all his ways [are] judgment: a God of truth and without iniquity, just and right [is] he.

  • @huilie3608
    @huilie3608 3 роки тому +1

    Only KJV ( final authority ). Our GOD is not the author of confusion.

  • @chrismichels6987
    @chrismichels6987 10 років тому +1

    Luke 23:33 - Calvary - The KJV person seems to read this like the military cavalry. They are two different words. Check the spelling. In the KJV, Calvary is just from the Latin "Calvāria" which means "skull." The Greek word is "kranion" which is where we get "cranium." So, the KJV in this instance didn't even bother translating, but went with a Latin form which suggests a desire to have a "Churchese" word.

    • @classicnosh
      @classicnosh 9 років тому +2

      King James Only advocates don't like the Vulgate but the Vulgate had a major influence on the KJV.

    • @ColonelEmpire
      @ColonelEmpire 2 роки тому

      @@classicnosh They (King James Translators) were anti Catholic. Thus they did *NOT* use the Catholic Vulgate. They did use Latin Manuscripts though, just *NOT* the Catholic manuscripts. HUGE difference.
      Old Latin 200 A.D. in North Africa and Italy.

    • @classicnosh
      @classicnosh 2 роки тому +1

      @@ColonelEmpire - I don't think you ever compared them side-by-side. Trust me, the KJV only movement is utterly delusional.

    • @ColonelEmpire
      @ColonelEmpire 2 роки тому

      @@classicnosh It is obvious by your silly opinions that you are delusional...
      The King James Bible believers, (which carnal and worldly people, who claim to be Christians, label as "KJVO") are **Bible believers** We believe God. Here is what God said about His words:
      Psalm 12:6 The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.
      Psalm 12:7 Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.
      Matthew 24:35 Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.
      I Peter 1:23 Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever.
      I Peter 1:24 For all flesh is as grass, and all the glory of man as the flower of grass. The grass withereth, and the flower thereof falleth away:
      I Peter 1:25 But the word of the Lord endureth for ever. And this is the word which by the gospel is preached unto you.
      Bible believers are not delusional! We just believe God is able to preserve His words for English speaking people!
      *YOU* are delusional. Here is what *YOUR* father said about God's words:
      Genesis 3:1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And *he* (your father) said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said,...
      Your god is always casting doubt upon the words of God!

  • @lina-zz9kk
    @lina-zz9kk 3 роки тому +2

    The bible has become an idol.

    • @TheBrownsberg
      @TheBrownsberg 2 роки тому

      Realy, why is that?

    • @lina-zz9kk
      @lina-zz9kk 2 роки тому

      @@TheBrownsberg I dont actually believe what i wrote 8 months ago now and i have amended my original comment. I now believe that everything in the bible has been fulfilled. christianity no longer exists now . It did exist between 33-70 AD and when Christ returned destroyed judaism and temple worship and handed the kingdom back to God so that God is now all in all, christianity and Christs work finished at that time. Man being man did not want to accept that so created religion.
      I believe that God has enabled enough truth in the bible for us to determine what is what but i do not believe the bible is the inerrant and perfectly preserved word of God.
      Jesus did exactly as He promised He would, He made a short work in the earth. He dealt with sin death and satan once and for all. they are now in the lake of fire forever. God has not destroyed the lake of fire though. Good and evil have always existed even before creation and God has always hated evil and loved good. When we die now God does not even see the things we have done in the flesh because Christ dealt with that. He only judges the heart because all evil and good flow from the heart.
      The biggest evil in the last 2000 years is denying the completed work of Christ because that allows one man to judge another mans flesh and find it inferior and wanting. That is why all religions try and convert and save others who they deem unsaved and inferior to them. All bible based religions in a real sense deny Christs completed work.
      We all share the same grave so all that is left is to try and live a good life enjoy the brief time we have and never ever judge another persons flesh because we were all born because our parents used their waste organs to obtain a few moments of sensual pleasure and 9 months later we were cast head first screaming into this world where the only truth is that after an incredibly short time and 99% of the time after an excruciating illness we will die. Christ came to deal with that grim reality but religion and the bible zealots are not happy with that they want more for some reason.

    • @TheBrownsberg
      @TheBrownsberg 2 роки тому

      @@lina-zz9kk You sound twisted and confused, 'All bible based relgions' what kind of weird statement is that, what are you talking about. The KJV is inerrant, you are sick in the head and going to hell.

  • @LuvBorderCollies
    @LuvBorderCollies 7 років тому +7

    The KJV does not have anything containing "superior doctrine" to salvation. This whole ism is an invention of man's vain pride to think he is better than his neighbor, the lost sinner. KJV-ism so reminds me of the legalistic Calvinist church I grew up in.
    Constant fighting, arguing, back biting, hate, destruction of unity were the non-stop hallmarks. And to what end? They certainly exhibited NONE of the traits that believers are COMMANDED to be. These people loved to treat scripture like a buffet, I see the exact same mentality in the KJV non-issue.

    • @QuentinDunmore
      @QuentinDunmore 5 років тому +1

      Well 1st thing...the Gospel is common to all versions.
      Your growth as a Christian will depend on you using an uncorrupted bible ....ALL new version bibles are corrupt.
      KJV IT IS THE STANDARD PERIOD.

    • @terryford6609
      @terryford6609 4 роки тому +3

      @@QuentinDunmore Where does God say the KJV is the standard? I do not read that at all in scripture. So what you are saying is unbilical, but KJV onlyism is unbilical, and should be rejected for the heresy it is

    • @TheBrownsberg
      @TheBrownsberg 2 роки тому

      KJV ism, you realize that you are blaspheming the word of God, this will have consequenses you know that right. This is the reason why God created a special place for you guys in hell.

    • @TheBrownsberg
      @TheBrownsberg 2 роки тому

      @@terryford6609 No, KJV only-ism is not a heresy, utter nonsense you are spouting. KJV is sound doctrine, the one and only God breathed word of GOD. That is pretty audatious you are playing with fire so wil be thrown into the lake of fire.

    • @henrylaurel1188
      @henrylaurel1188 11 місяців тому

      ​@@TheBrownsbergTerry Ford never said that the KJV is heresy despite the fact that it has many mistakes and mistranslations. It is far from perfect certainly not God breathed. So you are a liar and deceiver teaching another gospel. Another gospel is of course the spirit of divination or witchcraft. That describes the heresy of KJV onlyism exactly. Who are you to tell someone they will burn in the lake of fire because they have not fallen for the KJV only deception? Usual double standards, hypocrisy and rotten fruit of the KJV only cult that Satan has raised up.

  • @briangray925
    @briangray925 7 років тому +2

    God bless everybody that comes to this page! I hope we are all edified. I know there are claims that since 1611, there has been a few more ancient text discovered to help in translation. I think we are very fortunate to have some accomplished brothers trying to deliver the best possible translation of the Holy Word that they can from an ancient foreign language. I also hope your preference in scripture leads to no division among us. Study that which you get the most out of. Be grateful you can use several Bibles to cross reference for a broader understanding. I sure do!

    • @berean65
      @berean65 2 роки тому +1

      The broad road leads to hell. Stay on the narrow path of the King James Bible!

  • @eyeonart6865
    @eyeonart6865 4 роки тому

    Put bible tabs on your bibles.

  • @terryallen3550
    @terryallen3550 8 років тому +2

    Don't think too much guys and girls, it's not good for our souls. I would die for anyone of yous. Not ask what you read or how you live. It hurts so much the way these fights are going. God bless your caring, sharing soul Dr Sam Gipp you saved me, I've tears of joy :,) +1 to heavens count Jesus loves us so much, in Jesus name, Amen :,)

    • @williamragle1608
      @williamragle1608 3 роки тому +1

      "Don't think too much" is a very bad life philosophy. It's what cults tell their members. Our God is a god of knowledge and wisdom for how to apply that knowledge. Proverbs 4:7 KJV - Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom: and with all thy getting get understanding.

  • @Revelation18-4
    @Revelation18-4 11 місяців тому +2

    The Alexandrian text of Egypt is inferior to the core.

  • @dennishagans6339
    @dennishagans6339 2 роки тому

    I am KJVO, I came here for the KJVO content, but
    Luk 9:53 And they did not receive him, because his face was as though he would go to Jerusalem.
    Luk 9:54 And when his disciples James and John saw this, they said, Lord, wilt thou that we command fire to come down from heaven, and consume them, even as Elias did?
    Luk 9:55 But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.
    I do not want to see anyone goto Hell, because it is separation from God forever to live in flaming torment forever, I would not wish that upon anyone, for Dr. Gipp to wish that on the man who was responsible for the NEB Caleb's daughter breaking wind passages to goto Hell is just wrong.
    Osas has given them that attitude, that is nothing but an attitude created by osas.
    That is not what Jesus taught, only when we pass to the other side do we have the right to say such things.
    Rev 6:9 And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held:
    Rev 6:10 And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?
    Rev 6:11 And white robes were given unto every one of them; and it was said unto them, that they should rest yet for a little season, until their fellowservants also and their brethren, that should be killed as they were, should be fulfilled.
    We are not there yet, we are still here and while we are here we operated under love, yes there is discaplain, yes there is reproof and rebuke as needed but to condemn anyone to to eternal damnation is absolutely wrong.

  • @emiljohann88
    @emiljohann88 2 роки тому +2

    King James is the best bible ever. A truly inspired bible.

  • @moisesg.v.1575
    @moisesg.v.1575 7 років тому +1

    The KJV calls pagan temples "churches" in Acts 19:37... the word in Greek is HIEROSULOUS, literally robbers of pagan temples. I think churches is not what the original writer meant to say when talking about pagan worship. KJV perfect??? I don't think so.

    • @anonymousperson6462
      @anonymousperson6462 6 років тому

      Moises G.V. the use of "churches" in acts 19 : 37 likely comes from tyndale's translation. He used the word to refer to pagan temples.

    • @TheBrownsberg
      @TheBrownsberg 2 роки тому

      Apostate, not it is correctly translated.

  • @speaktruthinlove119
    @speaktruthinlove119 10 років тому +5

    I appreciate the differences he points out, but he sinned when he called James White stupid, mocked him when he asked if they let him drive a car. James White is a brother and this guy sinned against him in public and needs to repent. I use the KJV, but I am so ashamed of KJV people and their lack of humility (Christianity) towards others. It's sinful and shameful.

    • @Airik1111bibles
      @Airik1111bibles 10 років тому +4

      Amen! Just because you love the KJV bible doesn't mean you have to agree to these embarrassments in the body of Christ. Its as though Gipp,Ruckman,Riplinger and other well known onlyest all get a free pass to sin openly. If you are an onlyest your in a very small group, because it seems like when these guys do un-Christ like things
      nobody in the KJV only camp calls them out. Thankyou for your open rebuke of this guy.Judgement must first start in the house of God

    • @ktermalkut8332
      @ktermalkut8332 2 роки тому

      the Bible tells us that satan has children - Genesis 3:14-15, John 8:44-48.
      Could James White be one?

  • @Th3Pr0digalS0n
    @Th3Pr0digalS0n 4 роки тому +1

    It doesn't matter, we all have multiple translations within easy reach. And KJV has errors as well. A smart man when reading will always take questions back to the Greek or Hebrew. Fighting over translations makes us all look bad.

    • @kathleenking47
      @kathleenking47 3 роки тому +1

      Not...really
      However, there is dkme light in the other translations
      Psalms 119, has 176 verses in them
      16×11

    • @TheBrownsberg
      @TheBrownsberg 2 роки тому

      No, no mistakes, maybe in your little reprobate heretic mind it does Judas.

  • @PintoSound
    @PintoSound 9 років тому +4

    KJV ALL THE WAY

    • @nunesandrew4198
      @nunesandrew4198 9 років тому

      +pintosound Im with you.

    • @nunesandrew4198
      @nunesandrew4198 9 років тому +2

      +Daniel Stowers I don't understand brother, why are you being so hateful ? Brother why don't you humble yourself and ask the Holy Ghost to show you which bible translation you should use... Then you will understand why so many people like and defend the KJV. When you read the KJV it talks to your soul, If it doesn't you have to ask God why is there a barrier with the version and why it doesn't talk to you. Now about other translations, I believe that God can still talk to you through other versions now doubt and many people do get saved, and later on they move the the KJV. God bless you

  • @the1allahprays2
    @the1allahprays2 Рік тому

    KJV is a beautiful bible translation. Probably the only good thing that came out of the reformation.

  • @gallactorme
    @gallactorme 8 років тому

    Going great until Sam said "NASA said..." 46:00

  • @johncolage1651
    @johncolage1651 5 років тому

    jim The most accurate Bible on this planet earth is "The New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures."
    The latest King James Bible published in the year 2011, has restored the Divine name "Jehovah" 6,973 times and "Jah" 50 times. Reading it is the first giant step getting one out of false religion. But, it still has Jesus Christ in "Hell"? (Acts 2:31) Please explain why?

    • @---zc4qt
      @---zc4qt 4 роки тому +1

      LOL!!!!!!!!! @ John
      The guy who made the NWT's translation of the Hebrew Bible was asked in court to translate Gen. 2:4. When asked to do so LIVE-- in front of the court and witnesses in the court-room-- he said he could not.

    • @johncolage1651
      @johncolage1651 4 роки тому

      @@---zc4qt testing

    • @johncolage1651
      @johncolage1651 4 роки тому

      @@---zc4qt A translation of the Holy Scriptures made directly from Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek into modern-day English by a committee of anointed witnesses of Jehovah. Not a "guy." You need to bury your head in the sand.

    • @jasonb.6623
      @jasonb.6623 3 роки тому

      The NWT mistranslates the Greek when it doesn't match the doctrine of the Jehovah's Witnesses. It's not a trustworthy translation.

  • @alancrabb
    @alancrabb 8 років тому

    Interesting in parts, but flippant to the point of being irritating and full of dubious homespun wisdom ("global warning is a fraud"). The defence of 'calvary' (Latin) vs 'hades' (Greek) at Luke 23:33 is eccentric. The stunt of reading all versions simultaneously was silly. Probably comforting for KJV only believers, but I am guessing not very impressive for others.

    • @TheBrownsberg
      @TheBrownsberg 4 роки тому

      KJV is the Holy Scripture in English. There litteraly 1000 examples pointed out verse by verse in comparison to any other on translation why the king james is the Holy Scripture. There not even an debate. This is also the reason why the usa and the rest of the profane ungodly western world will go to hell soon. because they have earned that judgement possessing the truth in unrighteousness.

    • @alancrabb
      @alancrabb 4 роки тому

      @@TheBrownsberg : the origins of the King James Version(s) are well known. If you wish to limit yourself to that one translation, fine. Also fine and if you wish to refrain from debate. However, it is not for you to decide who receives divine judgement. Agape.

    • @SwollenostrichTM
      @SwollenostrichTM 2 роки тому

      @@TheBrownsberg your emotional defense of a tradition shines through with those statements. Kjv only presentations thrive in long monologues where the kjv verses are pitted against modern Bibles for nothing more than stirring up the emotions.
      The fair and balanced approach is to ask “what is the evidence for reading A, vs reading B.” This seeks, as much as humanly possible, to take ourselves and our emotions or traditions out of the investigation and to try to be as unbiased as possible. The exact opposite of what the long kjv only lists will do.
      And when many of the examples in those lists go up in a debate or are challenged in some way out of the safe spaces of the kjv only ‘amen’ echo chamber, the truth shines through.

    • @TheBrownsberg
      @TheBrownsberg 2 роки тому

      @@SwollenostrichTM If you attack the the KJV you are an enemy and I will treat you as such, now get lost devil worshipper. What is you argument against the kjv, if you don't offer any reason but to scoff, damn you.

    • @TheBrownsberg
      @TheBrownsberg 2 роки тому

      @@SwollenostrichTM You are willfully ignorant, After comparing the KJV you still are stubborn to acknowledge those other perversions are also the word of God. Then something seriously is wrong with your morals.

  • @johnclayton1026
    @johnclayton1026 5 років тому +1

    Bro Gipp is one of my heroes.

  • @nunesandrew4198
    @nunesandrew4198 9 років тому +2

    KJV 4 EVER

  • @susyhebner1815
    @susyhebner1815 6 років тому +1

    This man is so real! Gotta love him!

  • @mikaelnojd6672
    @mikaelnojd6672 2 роки тому

    Sam the hocks!

  • @21gunsalute10
    @21gunsalute10 7 років тому +1

    instead of worrying about this bible or that bible, why doesnt he work on his gut?

  • @christopherc2334
    @christopherc2334 4 роки тому

    Isn't it funny how angry people get over the KJV? Talk about demonic. Think about it.

  • @jamesbeverly3265
    @jamesbeverly3265 6 років тому +3

    I can assure you, the Holy Spirit is not in this room. There is to much arrogance and narcissism in it. Their behavior is disgusting.

    • @---zc4qt
      @---zc4qt 4 роки тому

      So Mr. James Beverly.
      KJV Onlyists only looks at verses and fact that they can MAKE fix their desired ideas and theories.

    • @jamesbeverly3265
      @jamesbeverly3265 4 роки тому

      @@---zc4qt What ?

    • @anonymousduck8456
      @anonymousduck8456 4 роки тому +2

      If you think this is bad, you should watch some of Steven Anderson's sermons 😂

  • @petewalsh764
    @petewalsh764 7 років тому

    The oldest Bible in existence is 1600 years old. Yes, a good 400 years after Jesus walked the earth. Even most biblical scholars admit that the New testament was started about 40 years after Jesus's death.
    There' been so many copies and so many miss translations over these years, we really don't know what the Bible was telling us.

    • @corywiedenbeck1562
      @corywiedenbeck1562 5 років тому +1

      This is exactly the problem and why I stick with the AV 1611

  • @maddenus5023
    @maddenus5023 5 років тому

    Psalm 16:1 and 11.
    Chapter (16) has (11) verses. God says He is alpha and omega the first and the last so let’s look at the first and the last words of this chapter.
    Preserve, Evermore. 1611 David did not do this knowing of the English translation by the order of King James. There are no mistakes.

  • @TheCorrodedMetalhead
    @TheCorrodedMetalhead 4 роки тому

    I'd love to meet this dude and have a beer with him.

    • @rd8370
      @rd8370 Рік тому

      Maybe a soda pop.

  • @henrylaurel1188
    @henrylaurel1188 11 місяців тому

    I have compared versions which is one of the reasons I no longer read the KJV. Especially as God has blessed us with more accurate modern translations, in English we can understand. Meanwhile KJV only cultists like Sam Gipp preach their own delusions

  • @Tracy-Inches
    @Tracy-Inches 5 років тому

    All seriousness must be had, for this is truly, verily verily a serious conversation happening, past present, and FUTURE. I want to share the truth but to be honest I cannot use this as a reference in all honesty with love.

  • @ToOpen6seven
    @ToOpen6seven 6 років тому +1

    As important as the Holy Word of God is and this matter of teaching about other corrupt and demonic versions, why all this laughing, joking and jesting!? This is a serious topic, and even though the teaching is decent, you make the seriousness of reading the KJV a joke by the way you act!!

  • @asheneckyajen
    @asheneckyajen 4 роки тому

    Ok, perhaps my correction will shake at least some people's trust in this man, and maybe that is good. It's obvious to everyone why numbers 21 sometimes reads "waheb" and sometimes "vaheb". It's because the German language uses "W" to represent the v sound. For historical reasons, that's become the standard way of transliterating the Hebrew letter "vav".Now, some translators prefer to use the English "v" instead of the convention, for clarity. But at the end of the day, its the same word said the same way. Sam just doesn't know this information.

    • @rlyle5804
      @rlyle5804 4 роки тому +1

      So you are saying that Sam mentions EIGHT different bible verses in EIGHT different translations, that are, in many cases, making TOTALLY DIFFERENT statements, and you attempting to refute him with the German "V" vs "W"?

  • @MixtapeKilla2004
    @MixtapeKilla2004 9 років тому +1


    Exposing Modern Bible Versions Is A Worthy Fight
    2nd Corinthians 2:17, “For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God: but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ.”
    We are living in a shameful apostate generation when most churches are woefully ignorant of Satan's devices. Most pastors and evangelists today are asleep spiritually. Satan has infiltrated our churches. The Bible warns about ungodly men creeping into the churches, denying the Lord. Jude 1:4, “For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.” Satan has not only crept into our churches, but today is firmly situated in every church that uses the modern Bible versions.
    Literally, churches who use parallel Bibles with the King James Bible on the left column, and the so-called “easy-to-read” translation on the right have a satanic Bible next to God's Word. All modern Bibles are translated from the corrupt Greek manuscripts said to be found in Alexandria, Egypt. In 1881 Brooke Westcott and Fenton Hort compiled their “New Testament In The Original Greek.” Westcott and Hort were occultists, reprobate concerning the faith.
    Anton LaVey authored “The Satanic Bible” in 1969, which has sold over 600,000 copies since. We know exactly where The Satanic Bible stands, that is, it is satanic! However, over 100,000,000 copies have been sold of the modern corrupted Bible versions, which were translated from Westcott and Hort's work. These modern versions of the Bible are infinitely more deadly and satanic than Anton LaVey's The Satanic Bible, because they falsely profess to be God's Holy Word. Pastors, evangelists and Bible colleges are completely silent about the corrupt versions. The truth is that they just don't care. It's not a battle that they need to fight in order to make money. In fact, the greatest threat to our churches today worldwide is the modern corrupt versions of the Bible. New Age is creeping in on every side!!! Satan has already changed much of the doctrines in our churches through corruption of the Scriptures.
    Romans 10:9 is a classic example, which teaches that a person must say “Jesus is Lord“ to be saved, which is a false plan of salvation. The King James Bible simply says to believe in thine heart that God raised Christ from the dead, and then with your mouth you confess that you've been saved. You don't confess with your mouth to be saved; but rather, because you are saved. Salvation is of the heart. The two texts render a totally different meaning. Also, read how Satan has butchered the plan of salvation in the NIRV. How much more corrupt does the NIV updates have to become, before preachers will start taking off the blinders, and cry aloud against this woeful evil in our churches? Satan is behind the corruption of all modern Bibles... they're ALL CORRUPT! Only the 1611 King James Bible translation can be trusted. Although there have been some typo revisions since 1611, there have been no new translations of it. In sharp contrast, the NIV has been major overhauled since the NIV 1984.
    Shame on any cowardly pastor or evangelist who hides behind the smokescreen of brotherly unity, claiming that he doesn't want to cause division in the church body. Shame on any cowardly minister who trumps unity over truth! Shame on any milquetoast preacher who elevates cooperation over conviction and truth! All across America we've got woefully apostate pastors who are using the so-called “easy-to-read” satanic Bibles that attack Christ's deity, remove the Godhead and pervert the simplicity that is in Christ by changing what it means to repent and be saved.
    All modern Bible versions come from an entirely different Greek manuscript that has ZERO (absolutely nothing!) to do with the trustworthy Textus Receptus (the majority text) from which our beloved King James Bible comes. Any minister who doesn't want to preach against the modern Bible-corrupting movement should resign and go get a secular job, because he doesn't really care about people and ought not be in the pulpit.
    Everyone needs to listen to this 100% truthful 1:23 hour interview with Dr. Gail Riplinger, titled, “NEW AGE BIBLE VERSIONS” (MP3), because she is absolutely correct. It is a shame that America's pastors choose to remain woefully ignorant of the satanic origin of all modern Bible versions! Someone told me recently that Evangelist Randy Chovan is really good. I went to look at his website and doctrinal statement. Although pretty impressive, the first thing I noticed is that he boasts of being exclusively King James Bible, but he says he won't expose the corrupt modern Bibles because he doesn't want to “cause division” in the churches. Brother we need some division, because our churches are becoming the armies of Satan!!!
    Occultist Alice Bailey Said the Churches Would Be Corrupted
    Freemasons are an infiltration group, particularly aimed at corrupting the churches. Don't take my word for it, listen to occultist Alice Bailey (1880-1949) who openly taught that Freemasons would infiltrate the church (false church)...
    “There is no question therefore that the work to be done in familiarizing the general public with the nature of the Mysteries is of paramount importance at this time. These mysteries will be restored to outer expression through the medium of the Church [false church] and the Masonic Fraternity… When the Great One [Antichrist] comes with his disciples and initiates we shall have the restoration of the Mysteries and their exoteric presentation as a consequence of the first initiation.” [emphasis added]
    SOURCE: "President Clinton Will Continue The New World Order"; Dennis L. Cuddy, RESEARCH MANUAL: AMERICA 2000/GOALS 2000, MOVING THE NATION EDUCATIONALLY TO A "NEW WORLD ORDER" Editor: James R. Patrick Citizens for Academic Excellence, 1994, 28-48.
    Wowza, wowza, wowza! Did you get that? Alice Bailey said that the public needs to be familiarized with the ancient mysteries. AND THE CHURCHES ARE THEIR VEHICLE OF SUBVERSION!!!!!!!
    Take a look on the back of any U.S. one dollar bill (see picture to left)! We are seeing the All Seeing Eye and The Great Pyramid (both displayed) everywhere these days! Now you know why! You are being familiarized with Satan's plot for world government, which began in the ancient religions. Why familiarize the public? It is because occultists are the custodians of world government and they now recognize that it is time to PREPARE THE WORLD to receive the soon coming man of sin, THE ANTICHRIST!!!
    By “outer expression” she means literally that woefully ignorant churches will unknowingly help promote the New World Order. If you think it's not happening, consider that every Baptist church using the modern corrupt Bibles are pulling on the same rope as the Devil. Famous author Mark Twain rightly said, “It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” One of the most difficult things to do in churches today is to wake people up to the reality that Satan has corrupted the Bible. It breaks my heart.
    The average Christian sees that the new Bibles are much easier to understand compared to the King James Bible (so they think), and so they love the new versions; but they do not have enough spiritual perception to recognize that Satan has butchered the Bible doctrinally, weakening it, removing the word godhead completely, ruthlessly attacking the deity of Christ and rendering the Word of God without the authoritativeness that is maintained in the majestic King James Bible.
    What many older Christians fail to understand is that baby believers are at the greatest risk. This is true of human life as well. Adults are aware and able to protect themselves, but little babies and small children are completely vulnerable. It's the same spiritually. For those Christians who grew up using the King James Bible and have been born-again for over 30 years like me, we can read the newer versions and it doesn't adversely affect us much because we have already learned the King James Bible.
    However, for a new believer who gets saved today, and has never seen a King James Bible (and likely never will), they will never learn the following list of words, because they've ALL BEEN REMOVED from the NIV series. All of these words have been completely REMOVED (and this is only a partial list) from the New International Version (NIV) of the Bible. If you use the NIV series of corrupt Bibles, you will never read the word “Calvary,” and the classic hymn “At Calvary” won't make any sense anymore.
    All these words are missing in the NIV and NIRV versions...
    ...Sodomite, regeneration, mercyseat, Calvary, remission, Jehovah, immutable, omnipotent, Comforter, Holy Ghost, Messiah, quickened, infallible, fornication, trucebreakers, winebibbers, carnal, slothful, unthankful, effeminate, backbiting, vanity, lasciviousness, whoredom, devils, Lucifer, damnation, brimstone, and the bottomless pit.
    Should it be surprising in this sexually immoral generation of pleasure-seekers, that the following convicting words have been stricken from God's word: sodomite, fornication, whoredom, effeminate and lasciviousness. Should it be surprising in this generation of reprobates who will no longer endure sound doctrine (truth), that they've removed the words: devils, Lucifer, damnation, brimstone and the bottomless pit? The Holy Spirit is no longer the believer's Comforter. In the updated gender-neutral 2011 NIV (you don't want to offend those feminists and lesbians), the Holy Spirit is no longer masculine. Folks, what will it take to wake you up?
    Every preacher and evangelist ought to be standing for the integrity of the Bible! I could name a hundred pastors who don't stand, amongst tens-of-thousands who won't! Wake up! Satan knows that if he can corrupt the Bible, then he can change our doctrines! I wouldn't give you a dime for a preacher who has been informed of the problem and then shirks it aside. I can respect a pastor who is ignorant of the matter, but I cannot respect any so-called man of God who has been shown what is wrong with the modern Bible versions and still chooses to keep using them. It is wickedness!
    God's Curse is Upon the Bible Butchers
    The Bible pronounces a curse upon anyone who corrupts the Bible. Revelation 22:19, “And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.” Biblica (formerly the International Bible Society) have perverted the Words of the living God by producing their demonic New International Version (NIV).
    Hardly any preachers are standing today for the integrity and purity of the Word of God. Most Baptist preachers are a shameful bunch. I'm talking about pastors who never take a stand for anything. Just because a church has a large attendance doesn't mean it is blessed of God. In fact, it is often the exact opposite. Some of the best churches in America are small congregations where the pastor is a genuine man of God who takes a firm stand against sin, false doctrine and error creeping into our churches. I love porcupine preachers, so people will get the point.
    Unlike most publishers who produce a new translation and that's it, the NIV is a work in progress, which keeps changing. Literally, the updated 2011 NIV is 38.8% different than the 1984 NIV. That is alarming! How can over one-third of a Bible version change in 27-years. What Biblica are doing is changing (updating) the NIV to accommodate the deteriorating moral condition in America. As feminism and lesbianism become more commonplace, so also will the NIV be updated to become more gender-inclusive. The word “godhead” has been completely removed, changed to “divine nature.” Daniel 11:38 says that the coming Antichrist will worship “the god of forces.” The NIV is the Antichrist's Bible, preparing the world's masses to receive the man of sin when he appears.
    “Lucifer” Has Been Completely Removed from Modern Corrupt Bibles
    Perhaps the most incriminating of all the words they removed from modern Bibles is the name of LUCIFER!!! Lucifer is the name of Satan before he was cast out of Heaven for attempting to overthrow God's throne. Should it be surprising that the spiritual being behind modern corrupt Bibles, Lucifer, doesn't want the world to believe that he exists? The following are drastically different. Whereas the beloved King James Bible teaches that Lucifer tried to overthrow God's throne, the NIRV completely obliterates the doctrine of Lucifer altogether and applies these Scriptures only to Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon....
    KING JAMES BIBLE - Isaiah 14:12-15, “How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit.”
    NEW INTERNATIONAL READER'S VERSION - Isaiah 14:12-15, “King of Babylonia, you thought you were the bright morning star. But now you have fallen from heaven! You once brought nations down. But now you have been thrown down to the earth! You said in your heart, ‘I will go up to heaven. I’ll raise my throne above the stars of God. I’ll sit as king on the mountain where the gods meet. I’ll set up my throne on the highest slopes of the sacred mountain. I will rise above the tops of the clouds. I’ll make myself like the Most High God.’ But now you have been brought down to the grave. You have been thrown into the deepest part of the pit.
    It doesn't surprise me that the ungodly occultists who gave us our modern corrupt Bibles completely remove LUCIFER from the Bible, because Freemasons worship Lucifer as God. Don't take my word for it, here's a direct quote from the legendary grandmaster of Freemasonry himself, Albert Pike (1809-1891). Albert Pike divulged the true demonic nature of Freemasonry in his writings . . .
    The Masonic religion should be, by all of us initiates of the high degrees, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian doctrine. . . Yes, Lucifer is God, and unfortunately Adonay (Jesus) is also God. For the eternal law is that there is no light without shade, no beauty without ugliness, no white without black, for the absolute can only exist as two Gods: darkness being necessary to light to serve as its foil as the pedestal is necessary to the statue, and the brake to the locomotive. . ."The doctrine of Satanism is a heresy; and the true and pure philosophic religion is the belief in Lucifer, the equal of Adonay (Jesus); but Lucifer, God of Light and God of Good, is struggling for humanity against Adonay, the God of darkness and evil."
    SOURCE: A.C. De La Rive, La Femme et l'enfant dans la Franc-Maconnerie Universelle, p. 588; Lady Queenborough, Occult Theocracy pp. 220-221.
    As you just read, Albert Pike worshipped Lucifer as God, rejecting Jesus Christ. Lucifer is the God of this wicked world according to 2nd Corinthians 4:4. Freemasonry is an organization within an organization, that admittedly deceives it's lower level initiates. The “light” which occultists, spiritists, psychics, witches, New Agers and Freemasons seek is Lucifer; and not the true Light of God's Word and Jesus Christ. Witchcraft is of the Devil.
    The Alexandrian Greek brutally attacks the deity of Christ, the Godhead and the plan of salvation. We are at war ladies and gentlemen! Lucifer is the god of this world. The NIV series removes the name and doctrine of Lucifer. That should be enough right there to open your eyes about the new versions. The pastor or evangelist who shamefully says he doesn't want to cause “division” in the body of Christ by exposing modern corrupt Bible versions is a coward with lace on his underwear!!! Get right with God!

    • @thebiblestudyhelper9389
      @thebiblestudyhelper9389 6 років тому

      Libertarian Prince it's extremely important to stupid people.

    • @henrylaurel1188
      @henrylaurel1188 11 місяців тому

      Lucifer has not been removed, it should not be in an English translation to begin with. No Latin word should be in an English translation. Just shows the Catholic influence on the KJV. Meanwhile God is using these excellent more accurate modern translations to bring many to Christ. Calling them sataniic is blaspheming the Holy Spirit. Not the idolatrous blasphemous KJV worshipers care

  • @TheOnlyOneKingElvis
    @TheOnlyOneKingElvis 8 років тому +2

    Poor Mr Gipp thinks he has a PhD.

  • @dw8773
    @dw8773 4 роки тому

    So much ugliness. Very sad.

  • @saltyforjesus
    @saltyforjesus 8 років тому +1

    The problem is that there are TWO Greek manuscripts, one that is accurate and one that is not. These modern bible mutilations use the one that is not. Period. If you only have half of the truth, or a mutilated or perverted 'truth' then how can the truth set you free seeing how it is corrupted by a lie? Jesus said you shall know the TRUTH and the TRUTH shall make you free, but if you are not reading, receiving and hearing the TRUTH of God's preserved words, by default, you are not receiving the truth that has the power to set you free from sin! CHURCH! Turn away from these mutilated false bibles! God is giving the warning! Take heed let no man deceive you!

    • @jasonb.6623
      @jasonb.6623 7 років тому +1

      There are not 2 Greek manuscripts. There are at least 5,000.

    • @saltyforjesus
      @saltyforjesus 7 років тому

      I was referring to what is commonly called the Majority Text, or Textus Receptus (made up of over 5000 individual ms's) VS. the 'new morphological greek new testament' -- which is basically a pile of horse malarky piled high and given out to the churches in the shiny package of 'NIV' or NASB, etc. So basically there are TWO bibles out, and one of them is fake! Hint: it's not the Textus Receptus that is fake.

    • @jasonb.6623
      @jasonb.6623 7 років тому

      So the NKJV, which is based on the TR, is good, right?

    • @saltyforjesus
      @saltyforjesus 7 років тому +1

      No, the NKJV is NOT based on the TR. It is based on the mutilated Greek compilation (GmorphNT).

    • @saltyforjesus
      @saltyforjesus 7 років тому +3

      There is no modern version that I would recommend ANYONE reading. If my dog could read, I would not let him have one.