"Don't Lecture Us On What To Do": Why SC Judge Got Angry At Home Ministry?| Supreme Court| Amit Shah

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 вер 2024
  • "the Supreme Court has issued a stern warning to the official of the home ministry of India. The Supreme Court took objection to words used in Centre's reply to gangster Abu Salem's plea. In a stern warning the Apex court told the Home Secreatary to not lecture the judiciary and not to tell it what to do.
    We do not take it kindly when you tell us to decide something which you have to decide, Justice SK Kaul slammed the govt while hearing the matter. What is the issue and why was the Judge angry at the govt, let us discuss in today's video.
    #SupremeCourt #HomeMinistry #AbuSalem #AmitShah #ApexCourt #HWNews #JusticeSKKaul #BJP
    To Join HW Membership Program: hwnews.in/subs...
    To Join UA-cam Membership - / @hwnewsenglish
    SUBSCRIBE to HW News English Here ► bit.ly/Subscrib...
    For advertising related queries write to us at sales@hwnews.in
    Connect With Us On:
    → Koo: www.kooapp.com...
    → Facebook: / hwnewsenglish
    → Twitter: / hwnewsenglish
    → Instagram: / hwnewsenglish
    For More Videos Visit Here:
    hwnews.in/

КОМЕНТАРІ • 210

  • @SaravanaKumar-ku4kj
    @SaravanaKumar-ku4kj 2 роки тому +40

    Suddenly they wake up till yesterday they are in COMA

  • @nafisasuhail7931
    @nafisasuhail7931 2 роки тому +5

    Hats off to sc judges..happy there is a ray of light now n then....u r an independent body to give justice 👍

  • @dominicdmello7531
    @dominicdmello7531 2 роки тому +80

    Why no contempt of court charges against the offending organisation?

    • @raghuvarv
      @raghuvarv 2 роки тому +16

      Because contempt of court charges are reserved for human rights lawyers and stand-up comics who have not the money or muscle power to evade judicial action.

    • @Heritagesagayoutube
      @Heritagesagayoutube 2 роки тому +1

      They can't because they can't mess with the government, they can only get the limelight by stating such statements and doing almost nothing.

    • @CANagarjunaReddy
      @CANagarjunaReddy 2 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/quP055kYW40/v-deo.html
      On Modi by Subrahmanian Swamy
      Dt 24 April 22
      Pl translate

  • @mulagadasuryarao3090
    @mulagadasuryarao3090 2 роки тому +17

    about 25 to 35% of Orders of SC, have been denied by the centre sofar.
    Then where is the Rule of Law existed in this so called Democratic country?

    • @ayushchaturvedi7098
      @ayushchaturvedi7098 2 роки тому

      Supreme court is stupid that's why...i don't know why according to some supreme court is right and everyone else is false 😀

  • @Abdul_the_next_door
    @Abdul_the_next_door 2 роки тому +72

    I am not impressed. Courts have been postponing the judgments and ignoring important constitutional issues like CAA and electoral bonds at the government's wishes. Too little and too late.

    • @4Nevyn
      @4Nevyn 2 роки тому +12

      I honestly feel they are picking and choosing. In addition to the ones you mentioned. Even Pegasus is on hold. The report never came.

    • @augustinealbertsouza9434
      @augustinealbertsouza9434 2 роки тому +3

      What about the continuous posponment of 65 lakhs sr. Citizens pension under EPS95, for the last 7 years.? What respect can the SC comand from helpless people who are continuously knocking at its door for justice. It's looks like justice in our country differs between a pot belied rich and thin bellied poor.

    • @raghuvarv
      @raghuvarv 2 роки тому

      I agree. Whenever I see an SC justice or the CJI issuing some seemingly strong statements now, I scream internally: quit showing us your useless bark and bite some big name in this government already, you sick neutered mutts.

    • @aanand17
      @aanand17 2 роки тому

      Believe or not our courts are full of corrupt nd incompetent people

    • @vishalyadav-ud4kv
      @vishalyadav-ud4kv 2 роки тому +2

      Caa was already passed. What's judgement in that.

  • @lgopalakrishnan3181
    @lgopalakrishnan3181 2 роки тому +11

    It is good to hear the the Supreme Court standing up to the Government. We have seen some pathetic Judges whose main endeavor while in office was to toe the line of the Establishment.

    • @bijseel8806
      @bijseel8806 2 роки тому +1

      you are blindly supporting illegal collegium' rants!

    • @lgopalakrishnan3181
      @lgopalakrishnan3181 2 роки тому +1

      @@bijseel8806 OK Since you seem to know more than me tell me what are the "illegal rants" made by the CJI.

    • @mdumairmdumair5183
      @mdumairmdumair5183 Рік тому

      @@bijseel8806 andhbhakt spotted

  • @tegsimranduggal3925
    @tegsimranduggal3925 2 роки тому +74

    Judiciary in every country shd be above Govt
    Nd
    Take decisions independently
    Without any bias

    • @anubhavtyagi2
      @anubhavtyagi2 2 роки тому +5

      Judiciary should never be above govt.nor below. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely, you would be naive if you think Judiciary is all correct.

    • @tegsimranduggal3925
      @tegsimranduggal3925 2 роки тому

      @@anubhavtyagi2 One of the pillars of country is Independent Judiciary

    • @NK-ni3qx
      @NK-ni3qx 2 роки тому +2

      @@tegsimranduggal3925 True. It is one of the pillars and not the one and only one pillar.

    • @cryogenic5456
      @cryogenic5456 2 роки тому

      Agle 100 years me ho jayega ye

    • @CANagarjunaReddy
      @CANagarjunaReddy 2 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/quP055kYW40/v-deo.html
      On Modi by Subrahmanian Swamy
      Dt 24 April 22
      Pl translate

  • @preal246
    @preal246 2 роки тому +37

    SC is so soft towards ugi... Not fair.. multiple priority cases in back seat or under the carpet ..where is Pegasus now 🙄

    • @gayaprasadlal697
      @gayaprasadlal697 2 роки тому +1

      Uncertainty when will come on boar?

    • @CANagarjunaReddy
      @CANagarjunaReddy 2 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/quP055kYW40/v-deo.html
      On Modi by Subrahmanian Swamy
      Dt 24 April 22
      Pl translate

    • @manchikantimurty7375
      @manchikantimurty7375 2 роки тому

      Centre raises many non issues and Pegasus is buried now deep

  • @leslierodricks2701
    @leslierodricks2701 2 роки тому +4

    Congratulations to the Supreame court's response to the Govt. Plea!

  • @petername2608
    @petername2608 2 роки тому +55

    Soon govt will make courts anti-national 😁

    • @RakeshGupta-qu9yj
      @RakeshGupta-qu9yj 2 роки тому +11

      😀😀😘 and the judge will be asked to go to Pakistan 😀😀😀

    • @jonron3805
      @jonron3805 2 роки тому

      how?

    • @asad5583
      @asad5583 2 роки тому

      @@RakeshGupta-qu9yj gh er it guy it is you u I

    • @asad5583
      @asad5583 2 роки тому

      You uuu I guy you up u

    • @asad5583
      @asad5583 2 роки тому

      You

  • @adhitibanerjee1515
    @adhitibanerjee1515 2 роки тому +22

    Thank God we have these justices

    • @nationfirst3478
      @nationfirst3478 2 роки тому

      Yes .. If your family dies in bombing at hands of someone like Abu Salem and courts free him.. then your comment will be most appropriate..

    • @muralidharan7226
      @muralidharan7226 2 роки тому +3

      So mamatz banerji is not going to jail. All the spineless judges diszgreed to hear cases against mamata

  • @prasadr1677
    @prasadr1677 2 роки тому +7

    What about Bhima korengaon cases?

  • @hippopole9657
    @hippopole9657 2 роки тому +38

    The ruling BJP government is trying to make every court as a government department .

  • @devarajmarimuthu9743
    @devarajmarimuthu9743 2 роки тому +6

    This and the bitter view of the Top Court in the attempt by the Powers that be in the Union Govt. in the matter of State Demolition of structures in Delhi are clearly attempts to test the waters to browbeat the Apex Court and that this was noted and dealt with is a faint ray of hope for the Common Citizenry of this Great Country who cherishes Rule of Law, Democracy,their abiding love of the country that all is not lost.

    • @zabymoazzam1663
      @zabymoazzam1663 2 роки тому

      Very true...... Even top court of the land is now being taunted‼️😳
      Citizenry GOES Bananas.

  • @rogerregal1423
    @rogerregal1423 2 роки тому +9

    Thanks to the Supreme Court for pulling up the Home Ministry !!!!

    • @k.govardhansingh1278
      @k.govardhansingh1278 2 роки тому +1

      SC should be very strict otherwise indian people life will become miserable.

  • @mauleshmark
    @mauleshmark 2 роки тому +2

    Great, I adore suprim court for the perfact action .
    Time like this certain sturn action is needed. ✅

  • @jaidaniel3731
    @jaidaniel3731 2 роки тому +2

    Finally judiciary hits their Balls to the walls … ouch ! Good work ! 🤣😂

  • @tamilanbu594
    @tamilanbu594 2 роки тому +1

    Great... to ensure the Rule of Law

  • @subratamazumdar5357
    @subratamazumdar5357 2 роки тому +4

    Absolutely correct in the view of SC proceedings.

  • @mijanurrahamanmollah9509
    @mijanurrahamanmollah9509 2 роки тому +17

    The Home ministry has been habituated in seeming itself above law. So, they are certainly entitled for receiving such actions from SC.

    • @CANagarjunaReddy
      @CANagarjunaReddy 2 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/quP055kYW40/v-deo.html
      On Modi by Subrahmanian Swamy
      Dt 24 April 22
      Pl translate into English and Hindi

    • @manchikantimurty7375
      @manchikantimurty7375 2 роки тому +1

      Home ministry is headed by a Chief BJP election campaigner and he hardly finds time to look into Home Affairs

  • @user-xe6md6jf5x
    @user-xe6md6jf5x 2 роки тому +2

    The judges need to be not only lectured , but also directed by the people of the country , that they have become political and inclined to the well being of criminals ,at the cost of the civilization and the victims .
    They have also become visibly arbitrary in choice of urgency for some , like the muslims and the opposition political interests ,and run away ,absent and recuse , or postpone or relegate to lower courts , when issues of life and death, rape and torture,lynching or setting houses on fire , demolition of temples etc that happen to hindus .
    Lecture the judges, their consistent failure may cost the downfall of the civilization.

    • @nationfirst3478
      @nationfirst3478 2 роки тому

      The Rice bag converts are lit in comment section supporting terrorists.. Seems like MHA is just doing fine.. The Judiciary is so corrupted that they can hear plea of terrorists and anti social elements any time but common people are fighting cases year after year without any verdict

  • @RehanKhan-tf9rk
    @RehanKhan-tf9rk 2 роки тому +1

    Brave Justice,,

  • @niloferck1398
    @niloferck1398 2 роки тому +11

    That the judiciary brought down its stature & respect in the form of some Retired judges RanjanGogoi & Bobde succumbing to greed of money and a Rajya Sabha seat. is why the Ministry of Home affairs, headed by uneducated and criminal background people, is dictating terms to the APEX COURT. .which is really unconstitutional and shameful

    • @manchikantimurty7375
      @manchikantimurty7375 2 роки тому

      Both the CJIs used to look at Modi with AWE and in the process both the CJIs forgot what they are supposed to do. The salaries paid to both of them was a National Waste

  • @johnsoncherian9570
    @johnsoncherian9570 2 роки тому +4

    I would appreciate if the Supreme Court act in time than these judges talk big things and these Gundas and Thugs act as if they own this country and rule it as if it is their personal property without any ethics and against the constitutional values. Supreme Court should act on it show it means, what it says and uphold the Constitutional values of Indian Democracy.

  • @rajmohandutta1814
    @rajmohandutta1814 2 роки тому +19

    SC is right and MHA is acting on behest of that narcissist Shah as if India is banana republic.

  • @anmolkumar-od1cc
    @anmolkumar-od1cc 2 роки тому +6

    Rule of law is above all and that has to be respected

  • @manisubramanian7683
    @manisubramanian7683 2 роки тому +1

    SC also at times delivers flawed JUDGEMENTS! WHO will correct this?

  • @gracekatam4155
    @gracekatam4155 2 роки тому +2

    It's good he said that.

  • @illegalbooks9374
    @illegalbooks9374 Рік тому

    Hat's off to the SC of India. The judiciary system must be leave independent.

  • @suryabhagavan5832
    @suryabhagavan5832 2 роки тому

    HSC gave a good advise to home ministry. We apprecite this kind of check. Long live our brave & just judiciary.

  • @muralidharan7226
    @muralidharan7226 2 роки тому +1

    The supreme court judges arrogant statement that nobody should teach them as if they know everything understand the sun. An intelligent person would always be humble and lead a simple life

  • @tonycandes4848
    @tonycandes4848 2 роки тому

    At last the SC knows they are above government and it should be that way. SC is there to ensure that Constitutional Rights are protected. We welcome this move.

  • @elizabethsundaram2822
    @elizabethsundaram2822 2 роки тому +4

    To counteract with this govt the authorities should be free of any bad history because govt is putting it's full force to find out the fault of the person and starts black mailing not for the interest of the nation's welfare but for their own welfare. Enough of their gondaisum

  • @truewords4164
    @truewords4164 2 роки тому +1

    System to unka hai . Supreme court of india is sleeping , when hindu needs them they mostly disappoints . Shame on these people .

  • @amitsomshetti3264
    @amitsomshetti3264 2 роки тому

    Difference Between Law graduate and Tardipar (prisoner), now such people will guide supreme court.

  • @longcha86
    @longcha86 2 роки тому +7

    Instead of warning take a Stern action against the law breakers be it ruling or Opposition. But sadly court is doing less and is running under the mouth piece of Jhumla party.

  • @kamals563
    @kamals563 2 роки тому +1

    The firm stand taken by Judiciary reposes faith in the people for having been firmly assertive, objectively to uphold the law, and has retained its credibility and integrity.

  • @jaswantsinghkailashiya4519
    @jaswantsinghkailashiya4519 2 роки тому +1

    In India there is no any political party nor any opposition party also no any Ruling Class.In India there is only Ruling Class. This Ruling Class is Theocratic in nature hence it wants to establish Theocratic State in India, in guise of Ram Rajya.

  • @parimalasamuel5945
    @parimalasamuel5945 2 роки тому

    Waoh! Kudos to the SC judges!Never compromise with unrighteous leaders! Blast them!well-done respected Judge!Home ministry, better learn!

  • @gopinathanberivenkatraman6251
    @gopinathanberivenkatraman6251 2 роки тому +1

    This union govt want act its own and want keep judicial under their control.
    That can never be accepted
    What court decides that must be final.
    Some selfish judges act as per politicians and becomes us Rajya sabha MPs.
    Their life is misarable.

  • @parichoygupta5859
    @parichoygupta5859 2 роки тому +1

    The Hon'ble Supreme court has reminded the Government that there is a limit to the excess.

  • @ramashramash4831
    @ramashramash4831 2 роки тому

    Supreme Court is the only top Court in the country these fellows can't over rule the direction if they overrule put them behind bars who ever it may be.

  • @azeezkhan9755
    @azeezkhan9755 2 роки тому

    Law above all

  • @johnmanjaly7063
    @johnmanjaly7063 2 роки тому +1

    Don't worry ... He will be transferred or he will be retiring soon... He is just bargaining for some positions post retirement... Some become MPs some board heads...so much for judiciary and bureaucarcy . Eg Vinod Rai or ranjan gogoi

  • @diva7892
    @diva7892 2 роки тому +8

    Can the apex court sue the top brass and the baboos for failing in their mandate and duties towards citizenry and spreading lies???
    Can they, dabardtod, take up sensitive pending cases and give relief to many people who are at receiving end of a super malicious regime??
    Unfortunately no!
    To quote nirupama Rao : we are not impressed!

  • @gilbertmenezes7169
    @gilbertmenezes7169 2 роки тому +1

    Why does SCI FALLING SHORT OF A JUDGEMENT. WHY ADVISE AGAINST SUCH DEFIANCE

  • @RajeevKumar-pd5xc
    @RajeevKumar-pd5xc 2 роки тому +2

    S.court not intervien in any of the bulldozers propaganda of bjp . Silence of in such riots indicates it's boundaries of courts .

    • @amols101
      @amols101 2 роки тому

      There are multiple ongoing cases for Delhi and MP.

  • @ijolamskian
    @ijolamskian 2 роки тому

    Firstly judiciary should be in its limits.

  • @mohdisrar211
    @mohdisrar211 2 роки тому

    Absolutely right ❤️👍

  • @amitabuch
    @amitabuch 2 роки тому +1

    Well said

  • @neetatoor5191
    @neetatoor5191 2 роки тому +1

    Then supreme Court should also not interfere with the security of the country which the govt knows best.... High time they too did their judicial reforms immediately...

  • @DA-sp2qy
    @DA-sp2qy 2 роки тому +1

    SC the most in-efficient organization India, it thinks it can be above reproach.
    Recently it said sinners deserve a chance while talking about a child rapist.
    A child who later lost her life in hospital.

  • @virinderdogra6086
    @virinderdogra6086 2 роки тому

    Yes NCLT on wishtown resolution plan is clearly avoiding instructions of SC to conclude on the subject matter by January 2022 but NCLT is not listening.

  • @shaunbird8051
    @shaunbird8051 2 роки тому

    The Supreme Courts saying is supreme and final. I t is a knock on the knuckles for the Govt.

  • @raomn9766
    @raomn9766 2 роки тому +1

    The centre n state political leaders not conversant of laws as per the constitution of India due poor education qualification. Further the Govt officials are at feet of political leaders n feel they can override the legal n constitutional obligation on their shoulders.

  • @satyanarayanaparuchuru1639
    @satyanarayanaparuchuru1639 2 роки тому

    There should be distinguish two types in violation of higher court orders.
    One the honorable high court orders pass orders, to be implemented by the government where the official,neglected in implementation of orders it is a contempt of court .next another way
    The honourable high court pass orders to be implemented by the government and same will be brought to the notice of government or ministry but they did not take steps for implementation
    In such a case it would be not only contempt of the court but also it would be constitutional break down by the government.

  • @ramamurthyir8710
    @ramamurthyir8710 2 роки тому

    I.Ramamurthy
    Why should Hon.Judges of Supreme Court so bother about the Terrorists who are creating and damaging the India's democracy..Suprement court should not interfere in national security affairs, which is paramount for India's safety. There should be
    any mercy for Terrorists who are not human being but beast killing innocent people without any heart.
    Jai Hind Bharat Mata ki jai Vande Matharam

    • @sameer-cx1vt
      @sameer-cx1vt 2 роки тому

      Mr.Brahmin please don't not comment unless you Have a law degree....

  • @hindimaamslsingh1138
    @hindimaamslsingh1138 2 роки тому

    Govt must tell court that next time court must follow what they are preaching

  • @mohammedasim6151
    @mohammedasim6151 2 роки тому

    How come now they dont want to hear what the home minister wants them to do? all along they were following government orders religiously.

  • @ummerkinathil2090
    @ummerkinathil2090 2 роки тому

    Justice delayed is justice denied...

  • @raghuvarv
    @raghuvarv 2 роки тому +9

    Big words from useless men. I shall take these statements more seriously if they actually did something about this regime and its horrible violations of our constitution.

  • @ramkrishnancherayath3924
    @ramkrishnancherayath3924 2 роки тому +1

    The whole thing is wrongly handled.. How the then HM can give assurance of giving protection to a Traitor...
    We should prove his participation in terrorism and give due punishment to the culprit

  • @rajakumardr.3956
    @rajakumardr.3956 2 роки тому

    Why sc is not passing orders on contempt and punish the non compliant.

  • @grk6573
    @grk6573 2 роки тому

    Of course, what the court says is final. But in this case the MHA saying it'll comply at the appropriate time is right, isnt it? Even if you go by Abu Salem's plea that his sentence should be considered as starting from 2002, the 25 year assurance needs to be debated only a few months before 2027 or at best a year prior to that. I think thats what the MEA submitted. Why is the court so charged over delivering "assurances" to a convict who was part of a heinous crime against India and her ppl, years ahead of a possible debate on the topic? If India has assured Portugal that their citizen will not face prison term over and above 25 years, it will be adhered to in the interest of our ties and relationship. I never get why Judges get so egoistic about any respectfully laid out statements(which may require further deliberation) by the MHA, considering that this is not some victim who has been languishing in Indian jails without even an FIR.

  • @drashokkumar9209
    @drashokkumar9209 2 роки тому

    Union Home Secretary is a Senior IAS Officer . Must had excellent academic record . Then , selected on the basis of one of the Toughest competitive tests .

  • @nationfirst3478
    @nationfirst3478 2 роки тому

    Why Judiciary should not be accountable when supporting convicted terrorists openly.. Everyone should be accountable including Judiciary.. And parliament is the Supreme body.. not courts..

  • @mirahmedalikhan7055
    @mirahmedalikhan7055 2 роки тому

    Yes it's obvious that our Home ministery wants to keep judiecery in there pockets.and they are keeping.

  • @ranjitsumati27
    @ranjitsumati27 2 роки тому

    SC should actually serve warning to the chief of Home Ministry - Amit Shah - He is the biggest culprit. These leaders of India while regularly insulting and lecturing even SC, people should understand how dangers are they for the country.

  • @mycomments3070
    @mycomments3070 2 роки тому

    Indian judiciary is more like a swimmer who is on the water and some powerful external force is trying to tie both of his hands and asking to swim..

  • @advocate650
    @advocate650 2 роки тому +1

    Hope SC will rise to the occasion n do as per law n conventions.

  • @dilipdesai5392
    @dilipdesai5392 2 роки тому

    It is better for the judiciary to get its priorities right and clean-up its own backyard with the massive backlog of millions of outstanding cases instead of acting all outraged with the wording of a letter by the Centre bruising its enormous ego. For their information the people of the country are not stupid with their ad hoc selective meddling on deciding matters to be heard by them and those not to be heard. To this day their abdication to deal with the genocide and ethnic cleansing of more than half million Kashmiri Hindus puts a huge question mark on their undertaking to serve the Constitution and the people of the country. The truth is that our legal eagles have a pathetic track-record with its inability to dispense justice in the millions of pending cases unlikely to be resolved during the lifetimes of the people involved. How can any sane person place confidence in a system that is so totally incapable of dispensing justice to the people of the nation. If a performance audit is to be done on our lordships the outcome is that they have miserably failed. Is this so-called pillar of democracy not accountable to anybody. Can our lordships give the public a crisp and clear answer of what plan of action they have to clear the millions of outstanding cases. The people of the country are waiting for an answer with bated breath.

  • @joejonnypetname8835
    @joejonnypetname8835 2 роки тому

    There are so many cases like this. We have go through.

  • @ashimkalita8386
    @ashimkalita8386 2 роки тому +1

    What about Electoral bond

  • @SonuKumar-mw7zg
    @SonuKumar-mw7zg 2 роки тому +1

    Where is rule of law,I want see

  • @kashyapdas8308
    @kashyapdas8308 2 роки тому

    The parliament is supreme not the Supreme Court

  • @srinivassc6281
    @srinivassc6281 2 роки тому

    If man like gogai can become MP of rajyasabha, what will happen to judiciary.

  • @vkp6360
    @vkp6360 2 роки тому

    For Judiciary to be respected, can judiciary claim its free of any ills

  • @biloresing6129
    @biloresing6129 2 роки тому +3

    judge is going to retire or should avoid morning walk ↗ℹ

    • @zabymoazzam1663
      @zabymoazzam1663 2 роки тому +1

      Did you know...... 50% of all senior Judges are due to retire in 2023...... Imagine the growing rut‼️😳

    • @arungadge9890
      @arungadge9890 2 роки тому +1

      That's the tragic irony.

  • @prabhakargts
    @prabhakargts 2 роки тому +1

    BJP showing its bad behaviour.

  • @shilarani6188
    @shilarani6188 2 роки тому

    These judges and supreme court should not be controlled by Modi

  • @SuperAnna007
    @SuperAnna007 2 роки тому

    Salute SC

  • @antonyirwinraj4469
    @antonyirwinraj4469 2 роки тому

    1. Parliament's role would be over after the enactment of Law with majority approval of the members.
    2. Home Minister's role is to safe guard the Law & Order in the country. Amit Shah is too much impertinent & exceeding his limit. His ministry has no right to dictate any other Authority especially High Court & Supreme Court.
    3. Supreme Court has over all power. SC is not using its power (அடக்கி வாசித்து கொண்டிருக்கிறார்கள்)! If SC used its power, none of the BJP'ians wouldn't wag their tails in front of Judicial Authorities.

  • @prasadarao9200
    @prasadarao9200 2 роки тому

    How long they will take to settle

  • @OpinionOfX
    @OpinionOfX 2 роки тому

    👍

  • @anthonyfernandes576
    @anthonyfernandes576 2 роки тому

    This is how our supreme court must b in interest of the nation and people & safeguard of our nation judiciary. Our judiciary section gone weak/lost it's power over these dirty politics. This HM is a goon ...

  • @peterthondaiman2962
    @peterthondaiman2962 2 роки тому

    Many cases in supreme court is pending by chif justice Ramana why, he is supportin Modi government 😞

  • @kdblr
    @kdblr 2 роки тому

    The Supreme Court has reduced itself to this. It has none but itself to blame

  • @arokiasamy9572
    @arokiasamy9572 2 роки тому

    home minister shd resign

  • @kolandairaj8615
    @kolandairaj8615 2 роки тому

    We see that SC is raising its head against official machinery ocassionally. Eventhough it may give some hope for the onlookers it gives great disatisfaction over SC since it is not clear in its action regarding Pegasus, CAA, Electoral Bond & the Art:370 suspension. People expect solid & timely action by SC on UG as it did in the " free vaccine" drama played by the govt. Leading legal stalwarts & Social Activists recently complained to SC regarding inflamatory & hateful speeches made by the hindu fanatics . But no tangible reaction seen from the courts. What does it mean ?

  • @ssankar7464
    @ssankar7464 2 роки тому

    Mera Bharat mahan

  • @ashishmoulik1368
    @ashishmoulik1368 2 роки тому

    well, they given in time, if so, otherwise it is injustice.

  • @sandyadams1970
    @sandyadams1970 2 роки тому

    Chasmish itni dukhi Kyu hai

  • @dsilva8796
    @dsilva8796 2 роки тому

    only warning? OMG. Warning !!!

  • @parthapratimlala6751
    @parthapratimlala6751 2 роки тому

    👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼

  • @dhruva49
    @dhruva49 2 роки тому

    why court supporting criminals?

  • @manchikantimurty7375
    @manchikantimurty7375 2 роки тому +1

    Yes. Yes Judiciary is correct. Once Modi (already 71) goes away then top court would become SUPREME again

  • @mohdstudy8630
    @mohdstudy8630 2 роки тому

    No rule of law of land , follow ....B..

  • @muthukumarchandrasekharan2485
    @muthukumarchandrasekharan2485 2 роки тому +1

    Home Ministry GoI shd consider moving the SC to expunge the remarks made by the learned Justice.

    • @somnatharcot2088
      @somnatharcot2088 2 роки тому

      You don't want SC to function independently. Bjp

  • @sanjayhattangadi2131
    @sanjayhattangadi2131 2 роки тому

    I hope you will take up the case where SC took up suo moto case of kanwad yatris and told the UP govt. to stop the yatra Or the SC would be forced to take strong action. But the SC was silent when Kerala govt. allowed Eid namaaz to take place. Why such double standards? I hope yr gr8 channel knows abt it but will keep quiet

  • @radhamoh
    @radhamoh 2 роки тому

    iska encounter kardo