Originally Superman couldn't fly, blast heat beams from his eyes, nor freeze things with his super cold breath. He was an alien from a planet with higher gravity than earth's thus making him stronger and more dense than humans. He was an intelligent Hulk. Instead of flying, he could "leap tall buildings in a single bound".
Steven Wilson Not single in any continuities right now. He has two children in Dark Knight 3, he has one in Rebirth, and I think the other ones are married too in the multiverse.
i would like to see this comic. As far as i knew the first appearance of superman was in action comics in 1938. I'm not being a dick, it would be cool to see where it all actually began.
people have this all wrong. It was spelled Super-man. It was by the same people but the character was not an alien, with those powers, or looked anything like that. So it's hard to say it's the same. Or even a version or prototype of Superman. He wasn't a mad scientist either. He wasn't a scientist at all. The story involves a mad scientist. We don't even get a description so he wasn't the inspiration for luthor who started with hair and ruled a country or something. People say that because of the image at the beginning of the story. To explain: This Super-Man is neither a supervillain or hero. It's a pure SF story. It's starts with a mad scientist that's trying to buy off bums from an aid line(wheatever their called). He pays him to be a guinea pig. The experiment works like in flowers for algernon. It's been awhile since I read but he had telepathic powers or some such and kills the man that made it. The guy had a heighten awareness or intellect from it and he planned to use it but the formula faded before long. I really barely remember it but the gist is that. Now luthor originally had none of those qualities and none had the powers this guy has. Luthor was a red haired guy, I don't know his origin personally, I never read it but he might have ruled osme country. Now Ultra humanite was an evil scientist. But the Super-man was not. Luthor eventuall absorbed Ultra's traits because he was depicted without hair in one panel or something. The known prototypes for superman go something like this: Hercules[Maybe], Samson[Maybe], Circus strong men[design], The Phantom[design] Doc Savage[there are similarities], Gladiator[a novel with someone that is described with the exact same powers as superman that I read and it's decent enough], and the real comic book prototype is Doctor Occult in his alternate form[doc occult is like mandrake, who is made by the same guy as the phantom]. Made by the same people, using a cape, flying around, very superheroish. the story is called the reign of the Superman/Super-Man. So all Superman gets from that is the name. edit:I shoudl add that I had read before that they already had the superman character by the time they made doctor Occult and just no one was buying it. But I don't know. I've also heard, but this might really not be true, that the original was a normal person with normal strength like the Atom, and not super powered.
That's one possible reason. Another is that armor is actually irrelevant as his bioelectric aura protects his layer of clothing as well (possibly retconned in new52). Andddd finally.. the guy needs to wear a red yellow and blue suit with the house of el symbol on there. Armor is the best explanation imo.. it's that or "yeah so clark just ordered a custom tee shirt for when he's being a superhero" lolz
Ran Wolf The current Superman & Lois are the post-Crisis, married version. They have a kid that doesn't get along with Batman's kid. How he didn't kill Lois from inside while she was pregnant is unknown to me.
In Silver Age continuity, red kryptonite could cause all sorts of physical and psychological changes which only lasted 48 hours, and would never affect him again. It was a wildcard thing.
Actually, his Pre Crisis suit was as indestructible as he was (as it was Kryptonian material), Post-Crisis is was said his body had a protective aura that protected everything but his cape. That said just because someone doesn't NEED armor doesn't preclude wearing armor because they want to, such as to honor his people. The U.S. Army doesn't normally use swords but they carry them sometimes for ceremonies.
Old School up until after Lois& Clark Superman's Body emitted a field a few centimeters off his skin that made himself resistant to damage as well as his outfit. That is why normal combat doesn't harm his cloths. Up untiI the New Supergirl TV show they let on that it is cloth from their home world that is way more durable. Also superman doesn't fly...Thought everyone knows that. No amount of airplane physics or the like will make this a thing. He manipulates Gravitational field around his body. That is also how he does some of those feats of strength you see. Like the clip where he stops the plane from crashing nose down. You can see the field change fly up the plane. Normal even if he could "Fly" and his normal super strength would have flatten the poor plane. There are a few Supers that do fly like storm or The Human Torch. Another example is in the movie where he goes to Lois and tells her to grab his hand and they "Fly". The Only other Hero type I can think of like Superman, Supergirl and the like that don't "fly" but travel through the air is the Silver Surfer.
Joseph Bentley Actually the body aura thing existed way before "Lois and Clark" aired. It first appeared in John Byrne's Man of Steel mini-series. Ma Kent mentioned it while making his suit.
Well at the time it was a victory for Doomsday cause he could actually come back to life later on. No one expected Superman to do the same, so technically he did win at least for a while.
And actually Superman always came back to life, when he is supposedly dead. To be honest Superman came back to life faster than Doomsday and most of the time, the battles between the has ended most of the time a draw, by both dying, but still managing to come back alive.
regarding his suit, It would make sense for him to have a sort of "armored" suit if he's flying at the speed of light and crashing through buildings. helps it be more durable and not shred as easy.
The thing is that Superman went out fine without one for almost 70 years, so for many it came across as just DC trying to make him "kewl", didn't help by how they promoted the whole New 52 Superline back in 2011. About why the costumed doesn't get shred, simple, Bio-Aura Post-Crisis wise, indestrutible material Pre-Crisis, so yeah he doesn't really need one.
@@spiderbatman97 Plus, Supes' costume was designed to emphasise his chest due to the Strongman influence on it, which in turn subtly demonstrates his strength and power. And that was one of the reasons his design included underwear, which also aided in giving his costume perfect color balance.
He used to jump everywhere. That changed in the Fleischer Bros. cartoons, when they found it difficult to animate him jumping everywhere and made him fly for convenience's sake, and presumably because it's more impressive.
everyone knows that. some other well known facts: his powers were copied from The Gladiator, a science fiction novella. Sometimes its said that he was inspired by Doc Savage too(in regards to his fortress). Heat and X-ray were the same thing(and actual x-rays). Being powered by the sun is a retcon!
+Beckoning Chasm Not exactly, Nerd Sync made an episode about that, in fact the Kryptonite was created in an unpublished story and was later use in the radio show
I mean, as long as we don't get the emphasis/focus on the underwear like every shot of Burt Ward in the Batman TV show seemed to have, I'd be down with the campy underwear costumes again. Would be a fun thing to do if they ever revisit a Flashpoint/Crisis like story again with differing costumes syncing up to the differing universes/people.
I like it for nostalgia sake, and because it is the classic look. But if we're being real, it does look pretty ridiculous by modern standards, and has been a source of ridicule for many years. I'm glad they ditched it.
Armour makes sense, because maybe Superman's body is super, but if he wore a normal costume, it would be turning into shredds everytime Superman makes a move.
Not true it was explain in comics that superman can control his muscles so he can make himself appear as strong or as week as he sees fit that's why no one notice him as clark is because his body is diffrent
J Smith excuse, I'd encourage you to read my comment with understanding, if you'd do it, then you'd know I meant something else that is Superman would tear apart a normal suit almost everytime he uses his superpowers, because his body may be above human, but a normal clothing is not that's why he needs a special clothing like armour for instance.
Can't say its a great film but I certainly didn't hate it In fact now that you mention it, I haven't seen it in a while so might watch it on the weekend
I saw it three times, and enjoyed it more the more I watched it. Sure, it wasn't as good as the original Christopher Reeve film, and it had some flaws, but it had really good material, and I enjoyed it.
OriginalTharios Opinions will always vary I guess I had a similar debate another superhero movie. But I was on the other side of the fence on that particular film. So we'll just have to a gree to disagree
OriginalTharios No not at all U dick. I was just trying to say how this thread would go on and on and on because your opion will difer from my opinion. There is no real right or wrong answer when it comes to films.Billions people could hate a film but U may have a few thosand who think it's great and nothing I could ever say would change that opionion. Do U UNDERSTAND now guy?
So its not superman, but Lois going back in time to krypton and hooking up with superman's father seems worth a mention. Cause that happened, google it
spiderbatman97 he revisits those themes over and over again throughout his run, with Superman getting visions of a socialist utopia and flashbacks of his father telling him he must use his powers not for personal gain, but to help those oppressed by the system.
His goal, or rather his entire reason for existing, is to kill everything in sight. Every time he dies, he comes back to life stronger, immune to whatever killed him last.
General Steelflex Yeah! - Thats more like it! - he was Kryptons weapon of mass destruction but they forgot to give a bit of grey matter so he could tell who were the good guys & who were the bad guys - So everyone & everything carbon based in multiverses must die ! - the raindeer & that lovely little yellow birdie in the build up (graphic novel) - Was just to let you know how bad he was ! And to him they were the enemy !
Dc didnt do a very good job of wanting everyone to forget about the death of superman story line by making one of main story parts to the batman vs superman movie LOL
Daniel rogers they never wanted it to be forgotten. The whole premise was to prove that Superman could quite literally survive anything by having him survive death itself
How about that Superman originally couldn't fly. He didn't have that ability in the comics until his first animated serial, when the animators gave him flying abilities in order to make him a bit more exciting. After that, he got to fly in the comics, giving his cape something to actually do besides look good.
It's even more boring than that. The animators didn't want to keep drawing frames for him jumping around. A few frames to repeat while flying was much easier to do.
The ability to 'leap tall buildings in a single bound' limited this "God". He jumps to his next next location then notices someone getting mugged while in the air. By the time he lands, re-aims then jumps back to where the crime was the criminal is long gone and the victim is dead. One reason I never liked Superman is he isn't. Me may be male but he's also an illegal Alien with unlimited powers and virtually no weaknesses. His comics should last until someone screams for help.
Superman's thing is he's physically omnipotent but that kind of power isn't enough to solve real issues, things in life aren't always as simple as kill/knock-out the bad guy and we're done; that's what make interesting Superman stories.
You left off the big ones... Superman III and IV. Even Chris Reeve refused to write about IV in his autobiography "Still Me," saying only this much: "The less said about Superman IV, the better." That was it. It's one of the most laughable and derided comics films ever! Definitely shouldn't have been omitted here. :-]
I wonder if another Superman movie with Reeve would have been made had he not had the tragic accident that paralysed him. He still was relatively young and could have played Superman well into the 1990's as he was only in his 40's then.
Lois and Clark are a thing again and even have a son named Jon. New 52 Superman is dead and has been replaced by his Pre-52 version. Why? Well one could say New 52 Superman was a shit Superman for wankers. #hashtag New 52 Superman was a Shit Superman for wankers. So Post-Crisis/Pre 52 Superman is back and married to his Lois and they have a son.
The Batman The Clark Kent of the Watchmen universe, because the whole thing involves Watchmen, and in the Watchmen universe, Superman would be fictional and clark only a human.
Connor Kent/Kon-El was part of the New 52 and member of the Teen Titans and was briefly replaced by Jon Lane Kent not the current Jon who is Pre-New 52 Lois and Clark's Son, but a teen from an alternate timeline and son of Lois and Clark raised by the villain known as Harvest. Connor eventually came back and is currently MIA. I have no clue where he or the other members of his Titans are Wonder Girl is also MIA. Red Robin/Tim Drake is believed dead and in reality kidnapped by Mr. Oz who might be Ozymandias from Watchmen. The current Titans are Nightwing, Troia, Arsenal, Tempest/Garth, and Caucasian Wally and Teen Titans are Damian Wayne, Starfire, Raven, Beast Boy, African-American Wally West (White Wally's Cousin), and Aqualad/Jackso Hyde is joining.
That era where Superman would just get whatever power they felt like at any time, for no reason. I recall in an early issue, Clark Kent being in a work meeting, hearing an emergency with his super hearing, and needing to leave. He created a distraction by throwing his voice with super ventriloquism, everyone looked out the window, to see what the commotion was, and when they returned to the meeting, Clark was gone. They were all wondering where he'd went. He created a distraction using super ventriloquism to leave a work meeting with his co-workers thinking he was an asshole for bailing unannounced, instead of just saying "I'm sorry guys, I have to leave for another engagement." There was an era of Superman comics that this sort of thing happened all the time.
Well yeah, but still that version of that relationship is fine, new 52 is like I said before with Spider-man One More Day, this new relationship isn't just happening, the writer and company is telling you, "You will love this out of the gate!" after one that was earned and lasted for years.
Lois was always a far more interesting pairing for him because she is a dominant with him as a submissive in their relationship. It makes a nice juxtaposition with the most powerful, god-like being in the universe being submissive to a weak, ordinary human woman. Pairing him with Wonder Woman always feels like they are just pairing them because they have a similar motif.
I'm not sure if she actually was his cousin in any continuity. Some she wasn't even from Krypton proper but a colony in the same system. Then there's the whole micro-city thing...
There's at least a couple continuities where only the Clark identity called her his cousin, not Superman's. Neither was comics, so I don't know if they pulled from anything prior/print.
In the story where they introduced Supergirl, one of the first things Supes says after learning she's his cousin is "I'll take care of you like a big brother." I think they threw that in so he'd look like he cared in the right way and it didn't look pervy.
fuck off, the S stands for superman. they just made up the house of el thing because it makes superman look like an arrogant cockhead by inventing his own nickname
Dave Carey And Batman isn't for having a bat on his chest? Each hero has a symbol to represent themselves. Kinda hard to take inspiration from somwhere when you're the first superhero
UncleMikeNJ I mean the first "superhero" as in, first character with a flashy costume, power, etc in comics. Like I said, kinda hard to take inspiration from something when you set the stage for the genre
I always wondered why Supes didn't go around in a radiation-resistant version of his costume considering how many villains seem to have access to Kryptonite and red sun radiation whenever the plot demands it.
Brago The power of Kryptonite is not exactly stated it is exactly up to the writers how strong it is. It can either be something that is like a cold making him feel like he stubbed hid toe, it's annoying it will hurt for a second but it won't bother him. Or its something that if he even smells it, it acts like stage 50 cancer and gives him every disease known to man (which is lazy writing). So in a simpler term it's a way for writers to escape out of a hole they dug themselves into. Frankly it's a terrible part of DC comics writing
the truth is. Kryptonite doesn't stop Superman from being able to use his powers, it just causes him so much pain that he can use his powers safely. for example he spent his whole life learning "okay, hit this hard if you need your opponent to go back this fair, hit this hard if you need them to go back further." when exposed to Kryptonite it hurts so bad he can't think clearly so instead of risking using his powers and potentially blowing up the moon. He has too get away so he can think. Personally I always thought Batman should use Blue K, it stops supermans powers from working but doesn't cause him any pain so they can talk it out.
At 1:50, that image of Superman hitting Green Lantern is taken from the 'Injustice' comics. Which has its main focus on Superman being a massive interstellar dick. And the Kryptonian biotech armour was more to protect his suit than it was to protect him. If he just wore normal spandex itd be blown off him in about 5 seconds in almost every fight he gets into. DC don't want people to 'forget' about Superman and Lois, they just took a different direction with the character, its not that big a deal. Doomsday was given a motive for killing Superman, though it was handled badly in the original story and only got properly developed later on. DC also don't want people to 'forget' about the underwear design, they just redesigned him to be less silly and more in line with modern culture, and the style they were trying to convey. Character designs change all the time, its not necessarily to try and distance themselves from the previous design.
In "Superman Returns" Lois is married, but her son is not her husband's. The hints are later in the film where he throws a full sized grand piano across the length of Luthor's motor yacht and again when he sees Superman, drowning in the ocean, from hundreds of feet in the air. But that still leaves the mystery of who is his *real* (genetic) father. Any guesses?
Other things that they probably wouldn't like people to know about Superman- He used to not be able to fly but could only jump a few blocks. He once could reshape his face like clay to look like other people. He one time was able to create tiny duplicates of himself which emerged from his hand. Kryptonite wasn't introduced in the comics but instead on a radio show and then a few years later returned in the comics to become a mainstay of his description.
That's not what they said. Clark's career as Superboy no longer existed as of his first post-Crisis issue, Man Of Steel (1986) #1. His being a totally different character is kind of the point.
The period of time the Superman of the main continuity spent as Superboy was. However you are also right as I remember John Byrne finding a convoluted way to keep a Superboy for the Legion of Super Heroes around by having the Time Trapper seize a moment fo time and create a pocket universe. That eventually got wiped out as I remember and led to Superman having to act as judge, jury and executioner with regards to the three Kyrptionian criminals who were in large part responsible for that.
He needs armor not to protect himself, but his clothes. Remember in the uncut version of DBZ when Goku fought Freeza and part of his dick was hanging out? Yep, they need clothes that can withstand the heat of battle. Or else a really cheap tailor.
Be that as it may nowhere do they say they have replaced New 52 Superman and Lois with their pre Flashpoint counterparts. Some of these are inaccurate. It leads us to believe the Superman/WW thing is current and it simply is not! I stand by my point.
But the trunks (what the undies are called) helped to break up his silhouette. Now he looks weird & "naked." If he isn't going to wear them anymore, then his bottom should have a pants-like separation.
How about something in between, like having the crotch region colored red. That way he doesn’t have the silly underwear but also keep the unique color contrast.
Hey Ben! Remember that time an Elseworlds story had Superman land in Soviet Russia instead of the U.S. and grow up to be the fighter of Russian justice for Comrade Stalin? It's called Superman: Red Son. Pretty sure DC would rather we forgot about that one, eh?
wariodude128 What about the comic of Revolutionary War never happened? Working for the Brits since early 1740s. 200 years later, Lois Lane somehow changed his mind and I forget the rest.
I don't think DC wants us to forget about one of the best Superman stories of all time. Plus Red Son Superman is actually in the Superman comics right now
superman returns was better than the new man of steel films. btw yes he does need armour suit not to protect him but so he can realisticaly do all the things he does without tearing his clothing to shreads. thought that was obvious.
Beg your pardon but no, Superman does NOT need armour. His invulnerability is due to a bio-electric field his body generates. This field extends several millimetres from his skin so it also protects his clothes from damage, as long as said clothes are form-fitting which his costume is. So once again, he does not need armour as his clothing already has more than enough protection.
begging your pardon as i dont what the comics say but as far as the films go his invulnerability stems from his dense molecular structure which does not extend beyond his body at all. once again he doesnt need armour to protect his body but does need it to protect his clothing.
Trickoholic Comics don,t make sense. The only reason they did it was because some fans would rather him look rad. It failed miserably. He looks so awkward without the underpants. Incomplete. It like he is wearing a leotard.
yes but the original comment about the armour in the clothes was based on the new movies and nothing to do with the comics. the resulting discussion therefore centres around the films making the comics irrelevant in this discussion.
I must be the only one who likes Superman Returns. it was a genuine attempt at having the world move on from Superman without having to kill him off. It was a bit of a soft reboot that just never got the love it deserved, but it has some very iconic moments that don't deserve to be ignored.
well with DC Rebirth they aren't shying away from the Lois marriage anymore (and thank fucking goodness for that.) and you did use Rebirth pictures so there is that :)
+Braktooth actually he has at one point he actually use magic heat vision but this was in the Batman Superman story sorcerer King and he spent a lot of time under a magic Sun
Kane Saunders HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!bro your going to kill me with laughter because,he he suicide hahaha squad and BvHa ha ha sorry this is just to funny Bvs happen to be one of the worst films of 2016!!Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha!!!!but just quit making jokes seriously ha ha
You skipped the part after the Doomsday thing where four different heroes showed up in Metropolis all apparently representing whatever had survived of Superman: a kid grown from cloned Kryptonian cells, a creepy alien cyborg, a guy in an armored metal suit, and a conscience-free android grown in the Fortress of Solitude. Which one will turn out to be the "real" Superman back from the dead? Oh, wait, none of them. It's actually a fifth guy we don't see for about a year.
I think the reason why he has armor now is not because he needs it to reduce damage, but so he won’t have to constantly remake his suit from all the battles he has. I don’t think a Superman with torn undergarments will be that dignifying. Armor could survive a battle.
To be fair, in recent comics they have mentioned that he still owns the red trunks costume, and the last Action Comics storyline flat out talks about the time Superman died, so they're not so ashamed of some of these things now
The armored costume for Superman makes perfect sense. Spandex doesn't hold up too well on re-entry or drilling into the earth. Sure Supes is fine because HE'S invulnerable but his clothing needs to be extremely durable because it will take extreme punishment.
(6) Not to mention that Wonder Woman was already paired with Batman in old 54. In fact, everyone in the Batman comics were pretty much swerved (or atleast that's where I noticed. I'm sure there's more) Stephanie Brown (who *I guess* is paired with Tim Drake) was erased, Dick Grayson's relationship with Starfire and his daughter Maria was erased, Bruce's life with Diana and a NOT SO F*CKED UP Damian was erased and the fact that The Killing Joke and Death in the Family happened post reboot.
Superman 4... and his ability to repair brick walls with his... heat vision?
Philip Chandler according to the 3 and 4 of the superman movie dont exist lol
LOL So bad they fell off the chart. Can't say I blame them.
Philip Chandler That took place during the Silver Age. He was a swiss army knife of powers.
not "heat vision". "repair-the-great-wall-of-china vision"
Always thought Lois being able to survive in the vacuum of space was astounding,
Originally Superman couldn't fly, blast heat beams from his eyes, nor freeze things with his super cold breath. He was an alien from a planet with higher gravity than earth's thus making him stronger and more dense than humans. He was an intelligent Hulk. Instead of flying, he could "leap tall buildings in a single bound".
So he was a Magikarp?
Sailor Dave he's single now. Got no ring on his finger now. He'll never let another chick bring him down in a relationship.
Steven Wilson Not single in any continuities right now. He has two children in Dark Knight 3, he has one in Rebirth, and I think the other ones are married too in the multiverse.
suemorphplus2009 fuck sake it's from Eminem: Superman (ironically).
and if we go by the old comics he also knock up a mermaid
#1, the FACT that the original Superman was created a villain and super-scientist.
Yup comic was called " The wrath of The Superman"
yeah but that was just the name. It was so totally unrelated to superman. ANd it wasn't a comic but a prose story.
i would like to see this comic. As far as i knew the first appearance of superman was in action comics in 1938. I'm not being a dick, it would be cool to see where it all actually began.
people have this all wrong. It was spelled Super-man. It was by the same people but the character was not an alien, with those powers, or looked anything like that. So it's hard to say it's the same. Or even a version or prototype of Superman. He wasn't a mad scientist either. He wasn't a scientist at all. The story involves a mad scientist. We don't even get a description so he wasn't the inspiration for luthor who started with hair and ruled a country or something. People say that because of the image at the beginning of the story. To explain:
This Super-Man is neither a supervillain or hero. It's a pure SF story.
It's starts with a mad scientist that's trying to buy off bums from an aid line(wheatever their called). He pays him to be a guinea pig. The experiment works like in flowers for algernon.
It's been awhile since I read but he had telepathic powers or some such and kills the man that made it. The guy had a heighten awareness or intellect from it and he planned to use it but the formula faded before long. I really barely remember it but the gist is that.
Now luthor originally had none of those qualities and none had the powers this guy has.
Luthor was a red haired guy, I don't know his origin personally, I never read it but he might have ruled osme country.
Now Ultra humanite was an evil scientist. But the Super-man was not. Luthor eventuall absorbed Ultra's traits because he was depicted without hair in one panel or something.
The known prototypes for superman go something like this:
Hercules[Maybe], Samson[Maybe], Circus strong men[design], The Phantom[design] Doc Savage[there are similarities], Gladiator[a novel with someone that is described with the exact same powers as superman that I read and it's decent enough], and the real comic book prototype is Doctor Occult in his alternate form[doc occult is like mandrake, who is made by the same guy as the phantom].
Made by the same people, using a cape, flying around, very superheroish.
the story is called the reign of the Superman/Super-Man. So all Superman gets from that is the name.
edit:I shoudl add that I had read before that they already had the superman character by the time they made doctor Occult and just no one was buying it. But I don't know. I've also heard, but this might really not be true, that the original was a normal person with normal strength like the Atom, and not super powered.
with Lex Luthor having Red hair, I think somewhere along the lines they ret-conned that character to be the modern 'bald' version Lex Luthor's father.
armor is probably needed so his suits don't tear to threads leaving him naked in well matched fights.
That's one possible reason. Another is that armor is actually irrelevant as his bioelectric aura protects his layer of clothing as well (possibly retconned in new52). Andddd finally.. the guy needs to wear a red yellow and blue suit with the house of el symbol on there. Armor is the best explanation imo.. it's that or "yeah so clark just ordered a custom tee shirt for when he's being a superhero" lolz
i agree.
If I had powers like Superman I would fight naked all the time. I probably wouldn't ever wear clothes.
Feels like Armor could be useful against really powerful villains like Doomsday and Darkseid.
+Nero Angelo true dat, definitely not try dat.
Underwear on the outside might seem silly, but from a design standpoint, it provides a great splash of color. The all blue's sort of bleh.
What the hell use would Superman have for a utility belt? To keep a mid-battle snack in?
He actually already wears a belt. Or something to mimic the belt he wore. Superman used to wear a belt but people often forget it seems.
ArcaneAzmadi. Fucking dead.
Exactly!
@GadGades well it wasn't a utility belt, it was just a regular belt to keep his trunks from falling down.
I guess WhatCulture hasn't read any of the new Rebirth stuff yet...
Ran Wolf I was about to say, cause if they did they would know the "newest" is died ,kind of.
Ran Wolf probably not
Teenage Hustler They had some frames from it in the video.
Bob Cemore
true but they were talking as if those storylines are still going. The Superman and Lois Lane of New52 are both dead.
Ran Wolf The current Superman & Lois are the post-Crisis, married version. They have a kid that doesn't get along with Batman's kid. How he didn't kill Lois from inside while she was pregnant is unknown to me.
I was so sure pink kryptonite would be on here
Joseph Diaz yeah lol
Joseph Diaz no. gay kryptonite is rainbow colored. that's canon from the comics.
Andy Skied pink kryptonite makes super man gay. Though, it was satire.
In Silver Age continuity, red kryptonite could cause all sorts of physical and psychological changes which only lasted 48 hours, and would never affect him again. It was a wildcard thing.
in Smallvile series, red kryptonite was a huge deal...
superman skin is indestructible not his uniform so of course he's gonna need armored uniform
also if he is caught with several forms of kryptonite or red sun radiation he still has some protection.
This armor makes kryptonite bullets obsolete, that's for sure.
Actually, his Pre Crisis suit was as indestructible as he was (as it was Kryptonian material), Post-Crisis is was said his body had a protective aura that protected everything but his cape.
That said just because someone doesn't NEED armor doesn't preclude wearing armor because they want to, such as to honor his people. The U.S. Army doesn't normally use swords but they carry them sometimes for ceremonies.
Old School up until after Lois& Clark Superman's Body emitted a field a few centimeters off his skin that made himself resistant to damage as well as his outfit. That is why normal combat doesn't harm his cloths. Up untiI the New Supergirl TV show they let on that it is cloth from their home world that is way more durable. Also superman doesn't fly...Thought everyone knows that. No amount of airplane physics or the like will make this a thing. He manipulates Gravitational field around his body. That is also how he does some of those feats of strength you see. Like the clip where he stops the plane from crashing nose down. You can see the field change fly up the plane. Normal even if he could "Fly" and his normal super strength would have flatten the poor plane. There are a few Supers that do fly like storm or The Human Torch. Another example is in the movie where he goes to Lois and tells her to grab his hand and they "Fly". The Only other Hero type I can think of like Superman, Supergirl and the like that don't "fly" but travel through the air is the Silver Surfer.
Joseph Bentley Actually the body aura thing existed way before "Lois and Clark" aired. It first appeared in John Byrne's Man of Steel mini-series. Ma Kent mentioned it while making his suit.
Doomsday wasn't victorious. Bullshit! It was a double knockout!
Well at the time it was a victory for Doomsday cause he could actually come back to life later on. No one expected Superman to do the same, so technically he did win at least for a while.
DarthAlphaTheGreat actually at the end of the comic, doomsday is shown revived and laughing as he's shot into space.
And actually Superman always came back to life, when he is supposedly dead. To be honest Superman came back to life faster than Doomsday and most of the time, the battles between the has ended most of the time a draw, by both dying, but still managing to come back alive.
CrisGab Gherghinel most of their fights are a stomp in either Superman or Doomsday's favor.
doomsday came back to life days later
regarding his suit, It would make sense for him to have a sort of "armored" suit if he's flying at the speed of light and crashing through buildings. helps it be more durable and not shred as easy.
The thing is that Superman went out fine without one for almost 70 years, so for many it came across as just DC trying to make him "kewl", didn't help by how they promoted the whole New 52 Superline back in 2011. About why the costumed doesn't get shred, simple, Bio-Aura Post-Crisis wise, indestrutible material Pre-Crisis, so yeah he doesn't really need one.
@@spiderbatman97 Plus, Supes' costume was designed to emphasise his chest due to the Strongman influence on it, which in turn subtly demonstrates his strength and power. And that was one of the reasons his design included underwear, which also aided in giving his costume perfect color balance.
He used to jump everywhere. That changed in the Fleischer Bros. cartoons, when they found it difficult to animate him jumping everywhere and made him fly for convenience's sake, and presumably because it's more impressive.
the flying started in the radio show
I didn't know that.
Point is, he started out jumping, smarter heads made him fly.
everyone knows that. some other well known facts: his powers were copied from The Gladiator, a science fiction novella. Sometimes its said that he was inspired by Doc Savage too(in regards to his fortress). Heat and X-ray were the same thing(and actual x-rays). Being powered by the sun is a retcon!
Kryptonite also came from the radio show. It was created so the actor could have some time off.
+Beckoning Chasm
Not exactly, Nerd Sync made an episode about that, in fact the Kryptonite was created in an unpublished story and was later use in the radio show
His silver age incarnation used to sneeze universes into oblivion.
This is why we got a reboot
Goy Ishah
It was a solar system actually.
what was the solar system
It was actually gross
The motherfucking underwear was the motherfucking bomb, and the moment DC has the balls to put the underwear Back, i'll respect them again.
Afonso Lucas respect
Afonso Lucas It looks fucking stupid
I mean, as long as we don't get the emphasis/focus on the underwear like every shot of Burt Ward in the Batman TV show seemed to have, I'd be down with the campy underwear costumes again.
Would be a fun thing to do if they ever revisit a Flashpoint/Crisis like story again with differing costumes syncing up to the differing universes/people.
I like it for nostalgia sake, and because it is the classic look. But if we're being real, it does look pretty ridiculous by modern standards, and has been a source of ridicule for many years. I'm glad they ditched it.
Preach!!! My parents had to buy me many Underoos for that reason.
The armor actually does make sense, no he doesn't need it but its more like him honoring his people.
or at the very least making sense so it doesn't rip to shreds irrevocably
***** very well put, couldn't agree more
Feels like Armor could be useful against really powerful villains like Doomsday and Darkseid.
"no, your cats need you Louis"
me: got DAMMIT, I laphed at that
Armour makes sense, because maybe Superman's body is super, but if he wore a normal costume, it would be turning into shredds everytime Superman makes a move.
Not true it was explain in comics that superman can control his muscles so he can make himself appear as strong or as week as he sees fit that's why no one notice him as clark is because his body is diffrent
J Smith excuse, I'd encourage you to read my comment with understanding, if you'd do it, then you'd know I meant something else that is Superman would tear apart a normal suit almost everytime he uses his superpowers, because his body may be above human, but a normal clothing is not that's why he needs a special clothing like armour for instance.
pre new superman could. new 52 not so much.
and I am saying he don't he can change out of his clothers really fast with out damage them so he don't need special clothing
Yeah. They actually used to explain that away by saying he generated a tiny force field all the time, so I think the armor makes much more sense.
Am I the only one that liked superman returns?
Can't say its a great film but I certainly didn't hate it
In fact now that you mention it, I haven't seen it in a while so might watch it on the weekend
I saw it three times, and enjoyed it more the more I watched it. Sure, it wasn't as good as the original Christopher Reeve film, and it had some flaws, but it had really good material, and I enjoyed it.
yes, yes u r.
OriginalTharios Opinions will always vary I guess I had a similar debate another superhero movie. But I was on the other side of the fence on that particular film. So we'll just have to a gree to disagree
OriginalTharios No not at all U dick. I was just trying to say how this thread would go on and on and on because your opion will difer from my opinion. There is no real right or wrong answer when it comes to films.Billions people could hate a film but U may have a few thosand who think it's great and nothing I could ever say would change that opionion.
Do U UNDERSTAND now guy?
A posh English accent just seems right for delivering facts.
I think they *didn't read* most of the comic books they re talkin about...
Yup...
The Bat of Gotham it's so dad, but yes
i liked Superman Returns
i can't believe the pink kryptonite was not on the list.
Pink K that made Superman gay!
schattentaenzerin lol
4:14 lost it at the suicidal lonely lois part XD
So its not superman, but Lois going back in time to krypton and hooking up with superman's father seems worth a mention. Cause that happened, google it
I love Socialist Superman. He fought the KKK.
I agree. He's a more powerful figure when he empowers those around him. Grant Morrison's New52 run was pretty damn cool.
Paul de Vries I haven't checked that out yet. I'll pick i up.
+Paul de Vries Wasn't he that just for like for 5 issues in the Morrison run?
spiderbatman97 he revisits those themes over and over again throughout his run, with Superman getting visions of a socialist utopia and flashbacks of his father telling him he must use his powers not for personal gain, but to help those oppressed by the system.
which makes no sense, since socialists love the system.
Superman Returns was the third best Superman movie and the real Superman three.
Doomsday was a great villain and he has his own story. His only goal is to become the strongest ever, he gets stronger each time he loses.
Connorr Thomas someone gets it
His goal, or rather his entire reason for existing, is to kill everything in sight. Every time he dies, he comes back to life stronger, immune to whatever killed him last.
No. he's legitimately a mindless hulk of death. He doesn't want to do anything but kill everything.
General Steelflex Yeah! - Thats more like it! - he was Kryptons weapon of mass destruction but they forgot to give a bit of grey matter so he could tell who were the good guys & who were the bad guys - So everyone & everything carbon based in multiverses must die ! - the raindeer & that lovely little yellow birdie in the build up (graphic novel) - Was just to let you know how bad he was ! And to him they were the enemy !
He's more than the Hulk of Death, he killed the Hulk in Death Battle.
Dc didnt do a very good job of wanting everyone to forget about the death of superman story line by making one of main story parts to the batman vs superman movie LOL
If marvel wants to replicate it, DC doesn't want to forget about it
Daniel rogers they never wanted it to be forgotten. The whole premise was to prove that Superman could quite literally survive anything by having him survive death itself
Daniel rogers and doing a terrible job with it. Don't forget that part.
who's watching this video with their eyes?
Maruf Ahmed I'm watching with my nose
well, I´m watching it with my brown eye...
Yup. All three.
Maruf Ahmed me
Me
Armour because otherwise his suit breaks all the time.
How about that Superman originally couldn't fly. He didn't have that ability in the comics until his first animated serial, when the animators gave him flying abilities in order to make him a bit more exciting. After that, he got to fly in the comics, giving his cape something to actually do besides look good.
It's even more boring than that. The animators didn't want to keep drawing frames for him jumping around. A few frames to repeat while flying was much easier to do.
He used to have the ability to run along power lines. Pretty shit super power really. Although I wouldn't mind having it myself.
ya the rip off flying from the Sub Marinor or how ever you spell that name Marvel Aquaman is who im talking about
The ability to 'leap tall buildings in a single bound' limited this "God". He jumps to his next next location then notices someone getting mugged while in the air. By the time he lands, re-aims then jumps back to where the crime was the criminal is long gone and the victim is dead.
One reason I never liked Superman is he isn't. Me may be male but he's also an illegal Alien with unlimited powers and virtually no weaknesses. His comics should last until someone screams for help.
Superman's thing is he's physically omnipotent but that kind of power isn't enough to solve real issues, things in life aren't always as simple as kill/knock-out the bad guy and we're done; that's what make interesting Superman stories.
You left off the big ones... Superman III and IV. Even Chris Reeve refused to write about IV in his autobiography "Still Me," saying only this much: "The less said about Superman IV, the better." That was it. It's one of the most laughable and derided comics films ever! Definitely shouldn't have been omitted here. :-]
Superman IV the Quest for Plotlines.
Siper2 the did not mention his castle building power, the stupidest the on the big screen until, "Martha"
I wonder if another Superman movie with Reeve would have been made had he not had the tragic accident that paralysed him. He still was relatively young and could have played Superman well into the 1990's as he was only in his 40's then.
Lois and Clark are a thing again and even have a son named Jon. New 52 Superman is dead and has been replaced by his Pre-52 version. Why? Well one could say New 52 Superman was a shit Superman for wankers. #hashtag New 52 Superman was a Shit Superman for wankers. So Post-Crisis/Pre 52 Superman is back and married to his Lois and they have a son.
And so far they have a much better story line. I'm personally burning with curiosity to find out the truth behind the "human" Clark Kent.
Agreed and very curious in seeing who this human Clark is and I really enjoy seeing Superman as a dad training his son.
The Batman The Clark Kent of the Watchmen universe, because the whole thing involves Watchmen, and in the Watchmen universe, Superman would be fictional and clark only a human.
What ever happened to Super-boy? The clone that Lex in the Arkiem knights series?
Connor Kent/Kon-El was part of the New 52 and member of the Teen Titans and was briefly replaced by Jon Lane Kent not the current Jon who is Pre-New 52 Lois and Clark's Son, but a teen from an alternate timeline and son of Lois and Clark raised by the villain known as Harvest. Connor eventually came back and is currently MIA. I have no clue where he or the other members of his Titans are Wonder Girl is also MIA. Red Robin/Tim Drake is believed dead and in reality kidnapped by Mr. Oz who might be Ozymandias from Watchmen. The current Titans are Nightwing, Troia, Arsenal, Tempest/Garth, and Caucasian Wally and Teen Titans are Damian Wayne, Starfire, Raven, Beast Boy, African-American Wally West (White Wally's Cousin), and Aqualad/Jackso Hyde is joining.
Superman didn't die from Doomsday he went into a Kryptonian healing coma.
That era where Superman would just get whatever power they felt like at any time, for no reason.
I recall in an early issue, Clark Kent being in a work meeting, hearing an emergency with his super hearing, and needing to leave. He created a distraction by throwing his voice with super ventriloquism, everyone looked out the window, to see what the commotion was, and when they returned to the meeting, Clark was gone. They were all wondering where he'd went.
He created a distraction using super ventriloquism to leave a work meeting with his co-workers thinking he was an asshole for bailing unannounced, instead of just saying "I'm sorry guys, I have to leave for another engagement."
There was an era of Superman comics that this sort of thing happened all the time.
Am I the only one who never did like the idea of Superman and Wonder Woman as a couple?
In the new 52 I didn't because it was basically "Spider-man One More Day" syndrome, but in Kingdom Come I liked it.
in kingdom come Lois was already dead
Well yeah, but still that version of that relationship is fine, new 52 is like I said before with Spider-man One More Day, this new relationship isn't just happening, the writer and company is telling you, "You will love this out of the gate!" after one that was earned and lasted for years.
Lois was always a far more interesting pairing for him because she is a dominant with him as a submissive in their relationship. It makes a nice juxtaposition with the most powerful, god-like being in the universe being submissive to a weak, ordinary human woman.
Pairing him with Wonder Woman always feels like they are just pairing them because they have a similar motif.
Lois is a psycho bitch
Superman had a crush on his Cousin
Well she WAS hot...
who didnt
I'm not sure if she actually was his cousin in any continuity. Some she wasn't even from Krypton proper but a colony in the same system. Then there's the whole micro-city thing...
There's at least a couple continuities where only the Clark identity called her his cousin, not Superman's. Neither was comics, so I don't know if they pulled from anything prior/print.
In the story where they introduced Supergirl, one of the first things Supes says after learning she's his cousin is "I'll take care of you like a big brother." I think they threw that in so he'd look like he cared in the right way and it didn't look pervy.
I actually liked superman returns, is there anyone else out there?
me too!! favorite comic book hero ever!!^^
Few people know what the S on Superman's chest really is.
It's the family crest of The House of El.
fuck off, the S stands for superman. they just made up the house of el thing because it makes superman look like an arrogant cockhead by inventing his own nickname
It's true his adopted mom made that out fit for him and put the S their for Super man
Dave Carey And Batman isn't for having a bat on his chest? Each hero has a symbol to represent themselves. Kinda hard to take inspiration from somwhere when you're the first superhero
UncleMikeNJ I mean the first "superhero" as in, first character with a flashy costume, power, etc in comics. Like I said, kinda hard to take inspiration from something when you set the stage for the genre
Dana Ripley I thought it was for hope
Unpopular opinion: Superman Return is not a bad movie. And it has the best Lex Luthor.
Vivien Portier Superman Returns is a great movie. But the best Lex Luthor is hands down Michael Rossenbaum from Smallville!
I always wondered why Supes didn't go around in a radiation-resistant version of his costume considering how many villains seem to have access to Kryptonite and red sun radiation whenever the plot demands it.
Superman returns was great, for me it was definitive Superman movie.
You must be high
high as a bird, high as a plane.
look it's super Jakub.
:P
That he has defeated Batman....alot.
***** thanks for proving my point. Ps Kryptonite doesn't do what batman fanboys think it does...
Brago The power of Kryptonite is not exactly stated it is exactly up to the writers how strong it is. It can either be something that is like a cold making him feel like he stubbed hid toe, it's annoying it will hurt for a second but it won't bother him. Or its something that if he even smells it, it acts like stage 50 cancer and gives him every disease known to man (which is lazy writing). So in a simpler term it's a way for writers to escape out of a hole they dug themselves into. Frankly it's a terrible part of DC comics writing
the truth is. Kryptonite doesn't stop Superman from being able to use his powers, it just causes him so much pain that he can use his powers safely. for example he spent his whole life learning "okay, hit this hard if you need your opponent to go back this fair, hit this hard if you need them to go back further." when exposed to Kryptonite it hurts so bad he can't think clearly so instead of risking using his powers and potentially blowing up the moon. He has too get away so he can think. Personally I always thought Batman should use Blue K, it stops supermans powers from working but doesn't cause him any pain so they can talk it out.
***** I am right and also it was recently revealed in Action Comics #968 that the undies aren't undies but part of the whole costume.
No you're not....admit it you love me :D
At 1:50, that image of Superman hitting Green Lantern is taken from the 'Injustice' comics. Which has its main focus on Superman being a massive interstellar dick.
And the Kryptonian biotech armour was more to protect his suit than it was to protect him. If he just wore normal spandex itd be blown off him in about 5 seconds in almost every fight he gets into.
DC don't want people to 'forget' about Superman and Lois, they just took a different direction with the character, its not that big a deal.
Doomsday was given a motive for killing Superman, though it was handled badly in the original story and only got properly developed later on.
DC also don't want people to 'forget' about the underwear design, they just redesigned him to be less silly and more in line with modern culture, and the style they were trying to convey. Character designs change all the time, its not necessarily to try and distance themselves from the previous design.
You're actually my favourite presenter always do these you're awesome
Can you say "Yes. Quite" while you are standing next to your Rolls Royce as your butler Jeeves serves you some tea.
*_Superman Red Son, never forget._*
I haven't watched this yet, but I can guarantee that Superman the video game is gonna be on here.
Fuck me then
Deniz Gult All right. Bend over.
Lois never recognizes Clark as Superman because she's too focused on his rippling quads in those tights instead of his face
10 things Dc want you to forget abt superman
1.his smile
2.his smile
3.his smile
4.his smile
5.his smile
6.his smile
7.his smile
8.his smile
9.his smile
10.his smile
Dude, Superman Returns was the first superhero movie I ever watched! It was amazing! From then on, I was Superman addicted.
Maybe if they keep doing the "Shit _____ ______ for wankers", it'll get funny eventually.
#ShitSupermanPornoForWankers
This is easily my least favorite joke on WhatCulture
Shit's powerfully not funny
TheDevil21 I love your Dark Magician Icon! :D
I kind of like it...
God damn, this is the type of analysis you get when wrestling fans crossover to comic book analysis.
Michael Myers, looking forward to ur new film
Even though this time Makes sense, Why does this narrator usually say: shit>somethingsomething
I would say he does #>something
Gene Miller Doesn't sound totally rational but, it could be
The only Americans I've heard using the word wankers are people into British comedy, who will also use other Britishisms.
Gene Miller Don't you know that this man says the shitforwankers quote every time he narrates? And Im asking why he does that
I don't think I've watched him before. Probably because he thinks it's funny.
In "Superman Returns" Lois is married, but her son is not her husband's. The hints are later in the film where he throws a full sized grand piano across the length of Luthor's motor yacht and again when he sees Superman, drowning in the ocean, from hundreds of feet in the air.
But that still leaves the mystery of who is his *real* (genetic) father. Any guesses?
Why would I forget this things?!!!!
These are great stuff.
well now rebirth has fixed the whole Lois and Clark thing... I think
And now Lois and Supes have a son
Re: Superman returns; the child is Clark's.
The kid in superman returns was his
Other things that they probably wouldn't like people to know about Superman- He used to not be able to fly but could only jump a few blocks. He once could reshape his face like clay to look like other people. He one time was able to create tiny duplicates of himself which emerged from his hand. Kryptonite wasn't introduced in the comics but instead on a radio show and then a few years later returned in the comics to become a mainstay of his description.
ah smallville
You forgot to mention the biggest thing. The original superman could not fly.
Where do these people get their info from? Superboy was not written out in crisis. Plus he is a totally different character
That's not what they said. Clark's career as Superboy no longer existed as of his first post-Crisis issue, Man Of Steel (1986) #1. His being a totally different character is kind of the point.
The period of time the Superman of the main continuity spent as Superboy was. However you are also right as I remember John Byrne finding a convoluted way to keep a Superboy for the Legion of Super Heroes around by having the Time Trapper seize a moment fo time and create a pocket universe. That eventually got wiped out as I remember and led to Superman having to act as judge, jury and executioner with regards to the three Kyrptionian criminals who were in large part responsible for that.
He needs armor not to protect himself, but his clothes. Remember in the uncut version of DBZ when Goku fought Freeza and part of his dick was hanging out? Yep, they need clothes that can withstand the heat of battle. Or else a really cheap tailor.
Yeah but Superman has a bio-electric aura that protects his suit anyway. As long as it's tight it will be protected like his own skin.
***** That too, yeah.
I always expect Adam in top 10 things you want to forget.
I don't think they want to forget aback the Death of Superman, as BvS had a very similar result.
The brief sex scene in Superman II was worse because it was live action!
You do know that Rebirth puts your entire video out of date. Superman is married to Lois and that other Superman is dead.
How does it put this video out of date? The whole video are about things in Superman's PAST that D.C. Wants their readers to forget about.
Be that as it may nowhere do they say they have replaced New 52 Superman and Lois with their pre Flashpoint counterparts. Some of these are inaccurate. It leads us to believe the Superman/WW thing is current and it simply is not! I stand by my point.
Rebirth Superman is so good, I love it. I grew up watching the JLA cartoons and this Superman feels perfect.
soulchain247 That's because he forgot about it.
Roland Baldwin not only that but did t new 52 take place in one of the alternate universes as well?
But the trunks (what the undies are called) helped to break up his silhouette. Now he looks weird & "naked." If he isn't going to wear them anymore, then his bottom should have a pants-like separation.
How about something in between, like having the crotch region colored red. That way he doesn’t have the silly underwear but also keep the unique color contrast.
Kevin Gomolchak That's why he still wears a bright red belt.
I love it when Matt Berry narrates these videos.
DC TV shows reminded us more than once that Brandon Routh played Superman, a mention of that was in the last part of Invasion storyline.
I liked Superman Returns...
Hey Ben! Remember that time an Elseworlds story had Superman land in Soviet Russia instead of the U.S. and grow up to be the fighter of Russian justice for Comrade Stalin? It's called Superman: Red Son. Pretty sure DC would rather we forgot about that one, eh?
wariodude128 What about the comic of Revolutionary War never happened? Working for the Brits since early 1740s. 200 years later, Lois Lane somehow changed his mind and I forget the rest.
I don't think DC wants us to forget about one of the best Superman stories of all time. Plus Red Son Superman is actually in the Superman comics right now
You don't know fucking shit. Read the comic.
superman returns was better than the new man of steel films. btw yes he does need armour suit not to protect him but so he can realisticaly do all the things he does without tearing his clothing to shreads. thought that was obvious.
Beg your pardon but no, Superman does NOT need armour. His invulnerability is due to a bio-electric field his body generates. This field extends several millimetres from his skin so it also protects his clothes from damage, as long as said clothes are form-fitting which his costume is. So once again, he does not need armour as his clothing already has more than enough protection.
begging your pardon as i dont what the comics say but as far as the films go his invulnerability stems from his dense molecular structure which does not extend beyond his body at all. once again he doesnt need armour to protect his body but does need it to protect his clothing.
Trickoholic Comics don,t make sense. The only reason they did it was because some fans would rather him look rad. It failed miserably. He looks so awkward without the underpants. Incomplete. It like he is wearing a leotard.
+Trickoholic The films are irrelevant. The comics are the primary canon.
yes but the original comment about the armour in the clothes was based on the new movies and nothing to do with the comics. the resulting discussion therefore centres around the films making the comics irrelevant in this discussion.
I must be the only one who likes Superman Returns. it was a genuine attempt at having the world move on from Superman without having to kill him off. It was a bit of a soft reboot that just never got the love it deserved, but it has some very iconic moments that don't deserve to be ignored.
well with DC Rebirth they aren't shying away from the Lois marriage anymore (and thank fucking goodness for that.) and you did use Rebirth pictures so there is that :)
Superman vs Godzilla
Superman vs ONE PUNCH MAN!! XDXD!!
He did punch him once, in any case, and it seemed to make an impact.
What about the fact that Superman was suppose to be able to read minds.
I think the only power Superman HASN'T has is the ability to sue magic, and I wouldn't even bet on that.
+Braktooth actually he has at one point he actually use magic heat vision but this was in the Batman Superman story sorcerer King and he spent a lot of time under a magic Sun
Let's not forget that Superman, albeit from Krypton, is also half Canadian! Joe Shuster was born in July 10, 1914, Toronto, Canada! y
Is the voiceover presenter (Ben) trying to sound like Matt berry?
Timed Revolver it's a UA-cam comment not a English essay you Fucking idiot
Adam Johnston Oh no, no, I don't think so.
Matt Berry's voice is pleasant to listen to.
Superman and Wonder Woman makes so much more sense. It's too bad the movies won't dive into it.
Hey, Doomsday is fracking awesome!
Unless your name is "Dawn of Justice".
Batman V Superman
number 1 batman v superman?
No,because that was a good film.
Kane Saunders nice joke,but I got a better joke,Suicide Squad
The level of originality in jokes on the internet is just stunning.
Edwin diaz It wasn't a joke.I was being very serious it is a great film and so is Suicide Squad.
Kane Saunders HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!bro your going to kill me with laughter because,he he suicide hahaha squad and BvHa ha ha sorry this is just to funny Bvs happen to be one of the worst films of 2016!!Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha!!!!but just quit making jokes seriously ha ha
You skipped the part after the Doomsday thing where four different heroes showed up in Metropolis all apparently representing whatever had survived of Superman: a kid grown from cloned Kryptonian cells, a creepy alien cyborg, a guy in an armored metal suit, and a conscience-free android grown in the Fortress of Solitude. Which one will turn out to be the "real" Superman back from the dead? Oh, wait, none of them. It's actually a fifth guy we don't see for about a year.
I think the reason why he has armor now is not because he needs it to reduce damage, but so he won’t have to constantly remake his suit from all the battles he has. I don’t think a Superman with torn undergarments will be that dignifying. Armor could survive a battle.
superman's briefs will always be the de facto look
That last point is what Superman *_SHOULD BE._*
Yes 😍
Idazmi7 a socialist?
Idazmi7 get fucked.
there was also the time when superman was a communist fighting for the glory of the U.S.S.R.
Red Son.
Except that was good. At least I enjoyed it.
Knightikhan Alternate Universe though so it's acceptable.
I like the typo: "gory" instead of "glory."
Or perhaps that was intentional? Or a Freudian slip?
i didnt even notice the typo thanks for pointing that out
Superman Returns was much better than Man Of Steel.
To be fair, in recent comics they have mentioned that he still owns the red trunks costume, and the last Action Comics storyline flat out talks about the time Superman died, so they're not so ashamed of some of these things now
I honestly really enjoyed this video. But a handful of these are not "Things DC wants you to forget". Still this was a good watch!!!!
4:21 that got dark
4:20 that got dank
Superman Dating and Marrying a Super Heroines makes so much more sense, why would he Date Normal Bitches XD
they'll eventually make him gay... and a female
And black
SolidMike84 hehehe, think they already made him black...
DC is not Marvel.
gay superman -> Apollo
female superman -> Supergirl or Superwoman
lol
Deena James And Muslim.
Which will really make him have an internal struggle with all of these sexualities & genders within him.
The armored costume for Superman makes perfect sense. Spandex doesn't hold up too well on re-entry or drilling into the earth. Sure Supes is fine because HE'S invulnerable but his clothing needs to be extremely durable because it will take extreme punishment.
I don't know how wrote this but the script was amazing 😂 the commentator was perfect for it absolutely hysterical
#mulletforsuperman
no wonder batman and Lex Luthor work together to get a load of cryptonite just for superman just IN CASE.
didn't Superman give batman his
Oh, yeah... gave it to him reeeeal good.....
J Smith but he already had it.
who gave it to him?
:P
Duane Locsin lex
the time when he turn gay and the old days power
I would like to hear about that.
Please explain.
Autobot Starscream which one 😮
Darkrai - san Both of them, if they're two different things. :)
Look up what pink kryptonite does to superman
Brian Bell Okay, thank you. :)
Superman Returns was fantastic!!!!
(6) Not to mention that Wonder Woman was already paired with Batman in old 54. In fact, everyone in the Batman comics were pretty much swerved (or atleast that's where I noticed. I'm sure there's more) Stephanie Brown (who *I guess* is paired with Tim Drake) was erased, Dick Grayson's relationship with Starfire and his daughter Maria was erased, Bruce's life with Diana and a NOT SO F*CKED UP Damian was erased and the fact that The Killing Joke and Death in the Family happened post reboot.