Gracias Padre Peter Heers por hacerme entender atraves del Espíritu Santo este entendimiento mistérico. Amén a su misión y ministerio Bíblico y De la Iglesia Santa Apostólica y Católica Ortodoxa. ❤
The proverb Chapter 14 says it all about Wisdom. God is the WORD. He's not like us or what we think. God's a consuming fire. Only humility connects us wtih GOD. Theotokos is our greatest brdige on that matter. Christ, have mercy!
There are many icons of "The New Testament Trinity" which depicts the Father as the Ancient of Days, on Mount Athos, and in many other Orthodox holy sites. This image is on the Antimins of the Jerusalem Patriarchate. There is not a single patristic commentary on Daniel 7 that interprets the Ancient of Days as being the Son. The Fathers, and Christ Himself, connect the vision of Daniel with Psalm 109, and the session of Christ to the Right Hand of the Father. Obviously Christ was not seated at the right hand of himself. The title "Ancient of Days" is one of the Divine names that applies to all three persons of the Trinity, but in Daniel 7 it can only be the Father.
Great insight, Father! With that said how do we interpret what Fr. Peter put forth here and why do so many Orthodox treat it as the default Orthodox position to interpret the Ancient of Days from Daniel 7 as the Son. What about the Moscow Synod that declared it was the Son?
@@caseycardenas1668 The reply would be to ask them to show where the Father say that the Ancient of Days in Daniel 7 was the Son. The answer is: "They don't." The Moscow Synod has not fared well historically. It is the most overridden Council in the history of the Church.
Being born Greek orthodox, I am glad to see someone explain and understand this and agree with this teaching. Ancient of days, wonderful counselor, almighty God, Lord of Lords and King of Kings, Yeshua.
Hymns that use the title "Ancient of Days" in reference to Christ only show that He is God. These are not commentaries on Daniel 7. One hymn that does comment on Daniel 7 is found in the Octoechos, Tone 5, Midnight Office Canon to the Holy and Life Creating Trinity, Ode 4, first troparion: "Daniel was initiated into the mystery of the threefold splendour of the one Dominion when he beheld Christ the Judge going unto the Father while the Spirit revealed the vision." HTM Pentecostarion (which includes this text from the Octoechos), p. 270 “Μυείται τής μιάς Κυριότητος, τό τριφαές ο Δανιήλ, Χριστόν κριτήν θεασάμενος, πρός τόν Πατέρα ιόντα, καί Πνεύμα τό προφαίνον τήν όρασιν.” Ωδή δ' πλ. α', ΤΟ ΜΕΣΟΝΥΚΤΙΚΟΝ
Don’t the early church fathers have a better understanding of the original faith than later fathers? Also, what about the icon of the “Beginningless father” in the katholikon of the Pantokrator Monastery at Mount Athos?
Thank You. l am a babe in Christ, but l always thought that there was no way to see the Father, He is SPIRIT. The only way to see a form is Jesus. So thank you for clearing this up. lt makes sense. l am of a reform persuasion, but the Church Fathers are GIANTS! lt is wise to listen to them. _ALL Glory goes To The KING of kings, and LORD of lords.''_ :)
father... would you consider a video on Acts 2 .... I will pour out my spirit on All flesh.... miracles, visions, dreams and prophesying... surely these didn't just stop after the original christians and early prophets died... ?
I’m sorry Father I’m a bit confused. If Jesus is the ancient of days in Dan 7, is He giving Himself all authority and dominion? It makes the text a bit confusing.
I believe the Son as the ancient of days is representing the Father. No man has seen the Father at anytime as Christ himself says. The Son is the image of the Father and it is He who represents the Father to us.
@@boardbill5852 I would agree with that and that is the typical interpretation I’ve heard from the Fathers. But what Fr. here explained sounded a bit different.
John 1:18 (ESV) No one has ever seen God; the only God, who is at the Father’s side, he has made him known. John 5:37 (ESV) And the Father who sent me has himself borne witness about me. His voice you have never heard, his form you have never seen, John 6:46 (ESV) not that anyone has seen the Father except he who is from God; he has seen the Father. John 14:9 (ESV) Jesus said to him, “Have I been with you so long, and you still do not know me, Philip? Whoever has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? 1 John 4:14 (ESV) And we have seen and testify that the Father has sent his Son to be the Savior of the world. St Ambrose of Milan explained it most clearly: "Let Him [Jesus] therefore stand in your midst, that the heavens, which declare the glory of God, may be opened to you, that you may do His will, and work His works. He who sees Jesus, to him are the heavens opened as they were opened to Stephen, when he said: "Behold I see the heavens opened and Jesus standing at the right hand of God." Jesus was standing as his advocate, He was standing as though anxious, that He might help His athlete Stephen in his conflict, He was standing as though ready to crown His martyr. Let Him then be standing for you, that you may not be afraid of Him sitting; for when sitting He judges, as Daniel says: "The thrones were placed, and the books were opened, and the Ancient of Days did sit." But in the eighty-first [second] Psalm it is written: "God stood in the congregation of gods, and decideth among the gods." So then when He sits He judges, when He stands He decides, and He judges concerning the imperfect, but decides among the gods. Let Him stand for you as a defender, as a good shepherd, lest the fierce wolves assault you" (Letter 63:5-6, NPNF, vol. 10, p. 457).
Is the depiction of The Ancient of Days with Jesus Christ, the God-Man, and the Holy Spirit out-right heresy? I would suppose so, yes or no? Forgive my ignorance and lack of understanding. I have an icon of the final judgement that has all three, the Holy Spirit is depicted as a dove. I have always wondered this. Your blessing Father.
"There was never any other time, at another time, the simultaneous appearance of the Father and the Son"... I'm not sure about that. With these matters, which are beyond our understanding, it's hard to say anything with total certainty. But there is the event where Abraham had the three visitors at the trees of Memre in Gen 18. Although those were sometimes interpreted as angels due to how Gen 19 sometimes referred to them, Abraham referred to them as "LORD", and scripture says "The LORD appeared" to him. It also says that the LORD would go down to Sodom and Gomorrah (leaving Abraham), but then it said still that Abraham still stood before the LORD when they did. I believe that might have been a Theophany of the Father as well as Son and Holy Spirit.
@@LadyMaria in Gen 18? The LORD says "I will go down to see", and also Abraham was talking to the LORD who didn't go down. And then in Gen 19, it says the LORD rained down sulphur and fire from the LORD out of heaven.
Angel means messenger. So that’s first thing. I believe in Exodus the Father says that He is sending the Angel of the Lord who has His name in Him. And that is the distinction.
I believe this is wrong and even one image this video showed of the Ancient of Days in Mount Athos (Pantokrator Monastery) with the triangular halo reads: "Ὁ ΑΝΑΡΧΟC ΠΑΤΗΡ" Which is translated to: "THE BEGINNINGLESS FATHER" And The Pedalion (The Rudder, a treatise on Orthodox Church canons by Nicholas the Hagiorite, 1749-1809) says: "ὁ άναρχος Πατήρ πρέπει να ζωγραφίζεται καθώς εφάνη εις τον προφήτην Δανιήλ ως παλαιός ημερών." Which is translated as: "The Beginningless Father should be painted as he appeared to the Prophet Daniel, as the ‘Ancient of Days.‘" This is not to attack the video I myself believe the Ancient of Days is only an energetic manifestation of the Father. By the Father through the Son and in the Spirit by the mode of the Father (Similarly to the Dove of the Holy Spirit). (correct me if I'm wrong).
Thank you, Fr. Peter. Fr. Stephen De Young also has a blog about First Enoch, where he discusses this issue. In Chapter 2, Parables, Fr. Stephen explains that the 'son of man' is Jesus in his human form and that 'ancient of days' is Jesus in his divine form.
When talking the topic of 'Paleaeos ton eimaeron'', I prefere to translating in english as the ''old of days'', I don't know why but while usng ''old'' instead of ''ancient'' makes me shiver ! Also thanks to Bishop of Morfou, the ''beast of Cyprus'' as eldress Galaktia used to say, said a story of Eldress Galaktia herseld, who so ''Someone'' in untold Glory, a ''Someone'' she couldn't imagine to understand who He was and Has sitting on an unfathomable throne and inside unfathomable glroy holding a small sphere in His hand like a little boy holds a gazzette toy sphere. And the eldress asked who is ''He'' and a voice told her: ''he is the old of days, Jesus Christ'. And the little spere He holds in His hand is the Universe, not just th earth, but the whole Cosmos''. The vision continued, revealing something horrible about our world and how the Lordwill deal with it. But this is another story, for another time 😋
Lord Iisoús Christos son of God please have mercy on us all, a sinner. Lord Iisoús Christos son of God please have mercy on us all, a sinner. Lord Iisoús Christos son of God please have mercy on us all, a sinner. 🫡ΑΜήΝ🫡
Very controversial subject. Many try to justify images of God the Father with interpreting Ancient of Days to be God the father. There is a particular hymn in the midnight office I think that identifies him as the Father, but I think as Fr Peter said, the majority opinion is that it is the son.
Christ was Creator of our world! Many beautiful sacred Orthodox icons depict this. We have one in our home. ☦️ In Orthodoxy, which is the true, never changing church of God, Jesus Christ is our Ancient of days. "And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all ages; Light of Light, true God of true God, begotten, not created, of one essence with the Father through Whom all things were made. Who for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven and was incarnate of the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary and became man. He was crucified for us under Pontius Pilate, and suffered and was buried; And He rose on the third day, according to the Scriptures. He ascended into heaven and is seated at the right hand of the Father; And He will come again with glory to judge the living and dead. His kingdom shall have no end." 🙏🏼 Holy God, Holy Mighty, Holy Immortal, have mercy on us. ☦️
Revelation 1:13-14 King James Version 13 And in the midst of the seven candlesticks one like unto the Son of man, clothed with a garment down to the foot, and girt about the paps with a golden girdle. 14 His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire;
No, father. Those who believe that some of the fathers believed that the ancient of days was God of the fathers, they are wrong because they do not know the interpretation of the fathers. None of the fathers believed the ancient of days! All the fathers are in consensus on this. They are always in consensus when it comes to doctrine. They are infallible. If the fathers can disagree on doctrine, then nothing they wrote concerning doctrine could be trusted. It is a matter of context and correct interpretation. When those certain fathers refer to the AD as the Father they refer back to Christ when Christ said “when you see me you see the Father.” There are many demonstrations of the fathers
If Jesus technically wrote the whole Bible. Wether prophetically or by his own self. He refers to someone other than himself as "The ancient of days" which is the Father. Not his father in heaven, but the father.
Fr. Peter. I had a vision of The Ancient of Days as spoken by The prophet Daniel in 2020. I spoke with him. He is God. Both Jesus as Man and as The Father. I am very grateful 🙏
Since the demons can also deceive us through visions, in Orthodoxy we are very reluctant to accept such things. The saints say that if we believe we have received a vision we should not talk about it openly but go to an experienced spiritual father to help us determine whether this was from God or the demons. Even the demons can appear as Christ and the saints.
@@OrthodoxEthos I understand. But visions are nothing new to me. I was born with the ability. I understand people's reservation but ive been at this a long time. Thank you Fr. Peter. Many blessings to you 🙏
@dmannezy Thrown in a mental hospital. Apparently I'm in religious mania, whatever that is. I think Christians, and ones in communion with God are BY definition able to be labeled as Paranoid Schizophrenic. I also pray for Death to The World. So probably an "inappropriate" confession when meeting others and discussing my thoughts ?
Be patient. The Antichrist will claim to be God in the flesh and he will present us with a supposed solution to the suffering in the world. If we aren’t patient, we will take the Antichrists offer
Gracias Padre Peter Heers por hacerme entender atraves del Espíritu Santo este entendimiento mistérico. Amén a su misión y ministerio Bíblico y De la Iglesia Santa Apostólica y Católica Ortodoxa. ❤
I love these little bite size videos. Thank you Padre.
Thank you Fr. Peter for your passion for the Orthodoxy
Christ is present everywhere and fillest all things!
The proverb Chapter 14 says it all about Wisdom. God is the WORD. He's not like us or what we think. God's a consuming fire. Only humility connects us wtih GOD. Theotokos is our greatest brdige on that matter.
Christ, have mercy!
Thank you Fr. Peter, may God grant me the oportunity to keep learning about Our Lord Jesus Christ with you
There are many icons of "The New Testament Trinity" which depicts the Father as the Ancient of Days, on Mount Athos, and in many other Orthodox holy sites. This image is on the Antimins of the Jerusalem Patriarchate. There is not a single patristic commentary on Daniel 7 that interprets the Ancient of Days as being the Son. The Fathers, and Christ Himself, connect the vision of Daniel with Psalm 109, and the session of Christ to the Right Hand of the Father. Obviously Christ was not seated at the right hand of himself. The title "Ancient of Days" is one of the Divine names that applies to all three persons of the Trinity, but in Daniel 7 it can only be the Father.
Great insight, Father! With that said how do we interpret what Fr. Peter put forth here and why do so many Orthodox treat it as the default Orthodox position to interpret the Ancient of Days from Daniel 7 as the Son.
What about the Moscow Synod that declared it was the Son?
@@caseycardenas1668 The reply would be to ask them to show where the Father say that the Ancient of Days in Daniel 7 was the Son. The answer is: "They don't." The Moscow Synod has not fared well historically. It is the most overridden Council in the history of the Church.
I am he.
Being born Greek orthodox, I am glad to see someone explain and understand this and agree with this teaching. Ancient of days, wonderful counselor, almighty God, Lord of Lords and King of Kings, Yeshua.
Hymns that use the title "Ancient of Days" in reference to Christ only show that He is God. These are not commentaries on Daniel 7. One hymn that does comment on Daniel 7 is found in the Octoechos, Tone 5, Midnight Office Canon to the Holy and Life Creating Trinity, Ode 4, first troparion:
"Daniel was initiated into the mystery of the threefold splendour of the one Dominion when he beheld Christ the Judge going unto the Father while the Spirit revealed the vision." HTM Pentecostarion (which includes this text from the Octoechos), p. 270
“Μυείται τής μιάς Κυριότητος, τό τριφαές ο Δανιήλ, Χριστόν κριτήν θεασάμενος, πρός τόν Πατέρα ιόντα, καί Πνεύμα τό προφαίνον τήν όρασιν.” Ωδή δ' πλ. α', ΤΟ ΜΕΣΟΝΥΚΤΙΚΟΝ
He is risen!
Pascha is some weeks away, brother
@@thodean
And Christ is always and forever not in the Grave.
@@thodean Could be Finnish as the Finnish Orthodox Church uses the Gregorian calendar for Paschalion as well.
@@tonyeriksson8803 ohhhhh, yeah, I forgot about that, if so, Truly He is risen!
@@acekoala457 Truly!
Don’t the early church fathers have a better understanding of the original faith than later fathers? Also, what about the icon of the “Beginningless father” in the katholikon of the Pantokrator Monastery at Mount Athos?
Thank You. l am a babe in Christ, but l always thought that there was no way to see the Father, He is SPIRIT. The only way to see a form is Jesus. So thank you for clearing this up. lt makes sense. l am of a reform persuasion, but the Church Fathers are GIANTS! lt is wise to listen to them. _ALL Glory goes To The KING of kings, and LORD of lords.''_ :)
father... would you consider a video on Acts 2 .... I will pour out my spirit on All flesh.... miracles, visions, dreams and prophesying... surely these didn't just stop after the original christians and early prophets died... ?
Read the lives of the saints 😊
I’m sorry Father I’m a bit confused. If Jesus is the ancient of days in Dan 7, is He giving Himself all authority and dominion? It makes the text a bit confusing.
I believe the Son as the ancient of days is representing the Father. No man has seen the Father at anytime as Christ himself says. The Son is the image of the Father and it is He who represents the Father to us.
@@boardbill5852 I would agree with that and that is the typical interpretation I’ve heard from the Fathers. But what Fr. here explained sounded a bit different.
Mormons believe the Father and the Son both have physical bodies.
@@georgiacap9294That's heresy.
John 1:18 (ESV)
No one has ever seen God; the only God, who is at the Father’s side, he has made him known.
John 5:37 (ESV)
And the Father who sent me has himself borne witness about me. His voice you have never heard, his form you have never seen,
John 6:46 (ESV)
not that anyone has seen the Father except he who is from God; he has seen the Father.
John 14:9 (ESV)
Jesus said to him, “Have I been with you so long, and you still do not know me, Philip? Whoever has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’?
1 John 4:14 (ESV)
And we have seen and testify that the Father has sent his Son to be the Savior of the world.
St Ambrose of Milan explained it most clearly:
"Let Him [Jesus] therefore stand in your midst, that the heavens, which declare the glory of God, may be opened to you, that you may do His will, and work His works. He who sees Jesus, to him are the heavens opened as they were opened to Stephen, when he said: "Behold I see the heavens opened and Jesus standing at the right hand of God." Jesus was standing as his advocate, He was standing as though anxious, that He might help His athlete Stephen in his conflict, He was standing as though ready to crown His martyr. Let Him then be standing for you, that you may not be afraid of Him sitting; for when sitting He judges, as Daniel says: "The thrones were placed, and the books were opened, and the Ancient of Days did sit." But in the eighty-first [second] Psalm it is written: "God stood in the congregation of gods, and decideth among the gods." So then when He sits He judges, when He stands He decides, and He judges concerning the imperfect, but decides among the gods. Let Him stand for you as a defender, as a good shepherd, lest the fierce wolves assault you" (Letter 63:5-6, NPNF, vol. 10, p. 457).
Is the depiction of The Ancient of Days with Jesus Christ, the God-Man, and the Holy Spirit out-right heresy? I would suppose so, yes or no? Forgive my ignorance and lack of understanding. I have an icon of the final judgement that has all three, the Holy Spirit is depicted as a dove. I have always wondered this. Your blessing Father.
They usually mean by icons like that God The Father, so yes that is heresy. (Common depiction is based on Papist heretical "icons")
"There was never any other time, at another time, the simultaneous appearance of the Father and the Son"... I'm not sure about that. With these matters, which are beyond our understanding, it's hard to say anything with total certainty. But there is the event where Abraham had the three visitors at the trees of Memre in Gen 18. Although those were sometimes interpreted as angels due to how Gen 19 sometimes referred to them, Abraham referred to them as "LORD", and scripture says "The LORD appeared" to him. It also says that the LORD would go down to Sodom and Gomorrah (leaving Abraham), but then it said still that Abraham still stood before the LORD when they did. I believe that might have been a Theophany of the Father as well as Son and Holy Spirit.
Only one angel that went to the supper was called Lord.
@@LadyMaria in Gen 18? The LORD says "I will go down to see", and also Abraham was talking to the LORD who didn't go down. And then in Gen 19, it says the LORD rained down sulphur and fire from the LORD out of heaven.
the Father has no material form dude
@@guineapig55555 God can do anything, despite what humans say.
Who is The Angel of The Lord? Some said that is Jesus also but in Luke 2:9 The Angel of The Lord announces the birth of Jesus
Angel means messenger. So that’s first thing. I believe in Exodus the Father says that He is sending the Angel of the Lord who has His name in Him. And that is the distinction.
Archangel Gabriel.
The text says "an" angel, not The Angel. Jesus is The Angel of His Presence, the Angel of the LORD.
@@czuw2967 Only THE Messenger of God. Is 1 angel. Archangel Gabriel.
It is Jesus, also the angel in Luke 2:9 isn’t Jesus/angel of the lord
I believe this is wrong and even one image this video showed of the Ancient of Days in Mount Athos (Pantokrator Monastery) with the triangular halo reads:
"Ὁ ΑΝΑΡΧΟC ΠΑΤΗΡ"
Which is translated to:
"THE BEGINNINGLESS FATHER"
And The Pedalion (The Rudder, a treatise on Orthodox Church canons by Nicholas the Hagiorite, 1749-1809) says:
"ὁ άναρχος Πατήρ πρέπει να ζωγραφίζεται καθώς εφάνη εις τον προφήτην Δανιήλ ως παλαιός ημερών."
Which is translated as:
"The Beginningless Father should be painted as he appeared to the Prophet Daniel, as the ‘Ancient of Days.‘"
This is not to attack the video I myself believe the Ancient of Days is only an energetic manifestation of the Father. By the Father through the Son and in the Spirit by the mode of the Father (Similarly to the Dove of the Holy Spirit). (correct me if I'm wrong).
Thank you, Fr. Peter.
Fr. Stephen De Young also has a blog about First Enoch, where he discusses this issue. In Chapter 2, Parables, Fr. Stephen explains that the 'son of man' is Jesus in his human form and that 'ancient of days' is Jesus in his divine form.
When talking the topic of 'Paleaeos ton eimaeron'', I prefere to translating in english as the ''old of days'', I don't know why but while usng ''old'' instead of ''ancient''
makes me shiver ! Also thanks to Bishop of Morfou, the ''beast of Cyprus'' as eldress Galaktia used to say, said a story of Eldress Galaktia herseld, who so ''Someone'' in untold Glory, a ''Someone'' she couldn't imagine to understand who He was and Has sitting on an unfathomable throne and inside unfathomable glroy holding a small sphere in His hand like a little boy holds a gazzette toy sphere. And the eldress asked who is ''He'' and a voice told her: ''he is the old of days, Jesus Christ'. And the little spere He holds in His hand is the Universe, not just th earth, but the whole Cosmos''.
The vision continued, revealing something horrible about our world and how the Lordwill deal with it. But this is another story, for another time 😋
ahh so you too are in on the plot. Thanks for the update! Much appreciated 🙏
@@KGraceSpeaksKea1335 ummm, what do you mean ? and first and foremost what do you have to say for the above comment ?
Thank you
Whens the next evenong session?
Tuesday 5pm PST for Revelation
Lord Iisoús Christos son of God please have mercy on us all, a sinner.
Lord Iisoús Christos son of God please have mercy on us all, a sinner.
Lord Iisoús Christos son of God please have mercy on us all, a sinner.
🫡ΑΜήΝ🫡
2:50 wrong.
*refuses to elaborate*
Very controversial subject. Many try to justify images of God the Father with interpreting Ancient of Days to be God the father. There is a particular hymn in the midnight office I think that identifies him as the Father, but I think as Fr Peter said, the majority opinion is that it is the son.
Where in the midnight office? I've looked and looked and can't find it.
John 1:1
I am he.
Christ was Creator of our world! Many beautiful sacred Orthodox icons depict this. We have one in our home.
☦️ In Orthodoxy, which is the true, never changing church of God, Jesus Christ is our Ancient of days.
"And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all ages; Light of Light, true God of true God, begotten, not created, of one essence with the Father through Whom all things were made. Who for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven and was incarnate of the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary and became man. He was crucified for us under Pontius Pilate, and suffered and was buried; And He rose on the third day, according to the Scriptures. He ascended into heaven and is seated at the right hand of the Father; And He will come again with glory to judge the living and dead. His kingdom shall have no end." 🙏🏼
Holy God, Holy Mighty, Holy Immortal, have mercy on us. ☦️
Revelation 1:13-14
King James Version
13 And in the midst of the seven candlesticks one like unto the Son of man, clothed with a garment down to the foot, and girt about the paps with a golden girdle.
14 His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire;
No, father. Those who believe that some of the fathers believed that the ancient of days was God of the fathers, they are wrong because they do not know the interpretation of the fathers. None of the fathers believed the ancient of days!
All the fathers are in consensus on this. They are always in consensus when it comes to doctrine. They are infallible. If the fathers can disagree on doctrine, then nothing they wrote concerning doctrine could be trusted.
It is a matter of context and correct interpretation. When those certain fathers refer to the AD as the Father they refer back to Christ when Christ said “when you see me you see the Father.” There are many demonstrations of the fathers
….but thank you. This video is very helpful.
If Jesus technically wrote the whole Bible.
Wether prophetically or by his own self.
He refers to someone other than himself as "The ancient of days" which is the Father. Not his father in heaven, but the father.
Jesus didn’t write the Bible 😅
@@xertzi9182He did through man.
@@xertzi9182 of course, it was Moses, the prophets, the apostles, the disciples, and according to you John.
Fr. Peter. I had a vision of The Ancient of Days as spoken by The prophet Daniel in 2020. I spoke with him. He is God. Both Jesus as Man and as The Father. I am very grateful 🙏
Since the demons can also deceive us through visions, in Orthodoxy we are very reluctant to accept such things. The saints say that if we believe we have received a vision we should not talk about it openly but go to an experienced spiritual father to help us determine whether this was from God or the demons. Even the demons can appear as Christ and the saints.
@@OrthodoxEthos I understand. But visions are nothing new to me. I was born with the ability. I understand people's reservation but ive been at this a long time. Thank you Fr. Peter. Many blessings to you 🙏
@@OrthodoxEthos I have exceptional discernment skills. Our Father is good. God is good. Is real.
@@OrthodoxEthos Mind you I am human and will make personal mistakes. My visions are clear. Thank you for your concern. It is greatly appreciated 🙏
I had a vision of soap and lampshades
God needs to come back in the Flesh. We've had enough of this
🙏🏼 be prepared, He is coming.
@@1stdebunker302’d
@dmannezy Thrown in a mental hospital.
Apparently I'm in religious mania, whatever that is. I think Christians, and ones in communion with God are BY definition able to be labeled as Paranoid Schizophrenic. I also pray for Death to The World. So probably an "inappropriate" confession when meeting others and discussing my thoughts ?
Be patient. The Antichrist will claim to be God in the flesh and he will present us with a supposed solution to the suffering in the world.
If we aren’t patient, we will take the Antichrists offer
@nickkerinklio8239 I adopted that terrible wicked spirit for a time ;( never again