Best Optics for PCC discussion

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 вер 2020
  • With some of the biggest USPSA PCC matches of the year in the rearview, we pulled in our team to talk about the best optics setup. If you want to get the most from your PCC in competition, this is a good use of your time. Give it a listen.
    Connect with JP Enterprises:
    www.jprifles.com
    jprifles
    / jprifles
    jprifles
  • Спорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 33

  • @timmartin6410
    @timmartin6410 3 роки тому +15

    Nice discussion on red-dots...basically comes down to what works for the individual shooter. But the one constant is all these guys have "Tactical Beards."

  • @sissydreams7494
    @sissydreams7494 Рік тому +6

    I'm leaning towards a Primary Arms micro prism 1x with the Gemini ACSS reticle for my Beretta CX4 PCC in 9mm. Light weight. Relatively low cost. Great battery life. Great reticle. Great illumination. Etched reticle, as a backup, if electronic elements fail.

  • @t6v5c2
    @t6v5c2 3 роки тому +20

    Need more close-up shots of each set up as you talk.

  • @ericb.4358
    @ericb.4358 2 роки тому +2

    I decided on a HOLOSUN AEMS enclosed sight for my upgraded RUGER PC chassis carbine (16" barrel). This circle/dot reticle is absolutely my favorite for many reasons, speed of target acquisition is one of them.
    It was necessary to add a MAGPUL 1/4" high snap-on cheekpiece to get perfect eye-to-reticle alignment with my cheek weld.

  • @susanobenchain5664
    @susanobenchain5664 11 місяців тому +2

    Very informative! Thank you from a new JP-5 shooter.

  • @chrisdiceart
    @chrisdiceart 3 роки тому +2

    JP for the 45 deg.mount, got it. What were the main mounts?

  • @brettsuitter2690
    @brettsuitter2690 Рік тому +2

    Practice is key for finding it every time

  • @superdacoolman
    @superdacoolman Рік тому

    For home defense and duty would a closed system like a T2 be preferred?

  • @Catgat37
    @Catgat37 3 роки тому +6

    I'm gonna be weird and run a vortex db 1.75-5x32 as my main and a sig romeo 5 on a 45 degree offset on a CA9MM

  • @Langdanion
    @Langdanion 2 роки тому

    I’m using the New Viridian GDO 30… it’s incredible…

  • @johnk815
    @johnk815 4 місяці тому

    I have a JP 16” 9mm barrel and my groups are 6-7” at 100 yards. That’s with a 10x scope. Seems too big of a group. Same scope on a ar15 I get 1” or less. What kind of groups could be considered expected with 9mm barrel

  • @ironsights7028
    @ironsights7028 3 роки тому +12

    510c is a excellent optic.

  • @ashlandgunclub1000
    @ashlandgunclub1000 3 роки тому +1

    It’s like 3 curlies and 1 moe

  • @PaganiniPagani
    @PaganiniPagani 3 роки тому

    My bros! 10 mm auto and im in 🤘

    • @joshuahaskell4455
      @joshuahaskell4455 4 місяці тому

      Ew why would anyone want to shoot that in competition? It’s not a comp round

  • @josephrogers7695
    @josephrogers7695 9 місяців тому +1

    This video really could have used up close shots of their actual reticles

  • @ryanlepper8981
    @ryanlepper8981 3 роки тому +3

    What is the general thoughts behind primary dot height? Low base, absolute cowitness, lower 1/3rd height, 1.93" mounts?

    • @jackwicker
      @jackwicker 2 роки тому

      Lower 1/3 is the way to go.

    • @SeaNNyTizzle
      @SeaNNyTizzle 2 роки тому

      I prefer 1.93 as long as the stock has a cheek riser. Even without one you will be alright.

    • @jackwicker
      @jackwicker 2 роки тому

      @@SeaNNyTizzle 1.93 is definitely the way to go for night vision, but I feel like lower 1/3 is a perfect all arounder. It's way easier to get behind lower 1/3 than absolute while standing, but it's also way easier to get behind lower 1/3 than 1.93 while prone.

  • @steveg3593
    @steveg3593 3 роки тому +1

    Anyone ever use the Eotech for PCC?

    • @TheRealPewPanda
      @TheRealPewPanda 3 роки тому +2

      I took a look at them - didn’t like the pixilated reticle

    • @steveg3593
      @steveg3593 3 роки тому

      @@TheRealPewPanda I agree. I love the size and shape of the window and the reticles, but the pixels can be distracting.

    • @TheRealPewPanda
      @TheRealPewPanda 3 роки тому +1

      @@steveg3593 agree! Allegedly the pixilation is a feature to make you look past and not on it but.. meh makes it look antiquated IMO.

    • @davidt9481
      @davidt9481 3 роки тому +1

      Yeah fudds

    • @_JEBUS
      @_JEBUS 2 роки тому +1

      I did a exps2 for a while on an akv. Works great but I felt it was too much optic for it and its bulky. Put that on an ar15. Nothing wrong with going that route though if that's what you have. Military runs them on apc9's n mp5's for anyone who thinks it's not practical.

  • @dougmarbourg
    @dougmarbourg 3 роки тому +3

    Josh has the manliest beard in all of manhood.

  • @Tateisadrummachine
    @Tateisadrummachine 2 роки тому +4

    pcc's are so underrated

  • @chriss8206
    @chriss8206 2 роки тому +1

    Does that dude have grease on his tats. If so man he's gonna catch flack.

  • @jamespboykin
    @jamespboykin Рік тому

    Screw optics...let's talk beard Maintenance