The example about the coffee being tasty technically exemplified abductive reasoning, and abductive reasoning is by no means less common than deduction and abduction. Rather, its formalization systems are less developed and less explicitly utilized. However, as Charles Sanders Peirce noted, all coherent sensory perception involves abductive reasoning. Your perception of words on a screen is actually the conclusion of an abductive argument. You see words on the screen because you unconsciously reason these specific words being on a screen is the best explanation for the patterns of variation within your visual qualia. And of course, distinction between and within sensory phenomena is itself deductive argumentation, and unconsciously associating those distinctions with past distinctions per common patterns is inductive argumentation. In truth, all three types of reasoning are used in a continuous stream of argumentation that constitutes you as a being.
jon will be ptomoted soon,since he's working here for longer than the others this senctence is which kind of arguements deductive or inductive? and with explanations please .....
Mam you looks like a pakistani actress. God swear wo apki dito copy he but mujhe uska name nahe yaad arha, mostly wo rony waly scenes krti he dramas mei
This is a great video. The only thing I wish we would avoid as scientists is using the word "theory" in this way. This gives people that say "evolution is just a theory" credence. The cell theory - all living things are made of cells and all cells come from pre-existing cells, is hardly something that needs further scientific support. :)
It was quite difficult for me to determine between Abductive and Deductive when creating certain examples. Would this be considered an example abductive or deductive. Pluto is made out of blue cheese. Everything made of blue cheese is tasty. Therefore, Pluto is tasty. It does seem to be a valid argument.
Thanks for your comment. This example is about deduction, in abduction minor facts are always missing and we can only make intelligent Guess, in deduction, theory guides us for making assumptions or hypothesis
@@ResearchTube thank you for your fast reply and clear explanation how to distinguish them both. So this argument can also be considered valid and unsound ?
How to write the justification of using qualitiative method (say content analysis) when reasoning is deductive? As you said, deductive approach generally deals with qauntitative data.
When choosing between inductive and abductive approaches in qualitative research, it is important to consider the nature of the research question and the data that is available. If the research question is exploratory and the data is rich and complex, an inductive approach may be appropriate to identify patterns and themes that can be used to develop new theories. However, if the research question is more focused and specific, and there is already a theoretical framework to work from, an abductive approach may be more suitable to test hypotheses and theories. It is also important to consider the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. Inductive approaches are often considered more flexible and open-ended, but may be criticized for lacking theoretical grounding. Abductive approaches, on the other hand, may be more structured and rigorous, but may also be criticized for being too narrow in focus. Ultimately, the choice between inductive and abductive approaches will depend on the specific research question, the available data, and the researcher's theoretical and methodological preferences.
EXAMPLE OF DEDUCTIVE REASONING Most of the students visit UAF Library to consult theses and dissertations. It was observed that a group of MPhil students of Agronomy visited the library multiple times last week. Therefore it may be deducted that MPhil students are visiting UAF Library most frequently these days to consult theses on Agronomy.
Respected Madam. Could you please guide whether following is correct example of inductive reasoning? EXAMPLE OF INDUCTIVE REASONING In an observation, libray staff noted that 7 out of 10 students of BS programs at UAF were using the Wikipedia as primary source of information. Later the same was found true in case of M.Phil. students as well. Therefore it was deducted that majority of UAF students consider Wikipedia as primary source of information.
Thanks for clarifying the difference. One small doubt - can we use deductive method to study existing theories in qualitative research? Appreciate your help.
your channel is the inspiration for me, and I am looking forward to starting my channel, but I don't have that much expertise like you. you are an institute maam
Abduction is usually used in content analysis(Krippendorff,2004) all these citations are learned here in your channel ma'am, before this, I was totally a layperson. you have given me a track
Sure ma'am. Ma'am plz guide that how do Hadiths are being cited. Their referencing and their plagiarism etc. If required for hadiths. Ma'am you know this area is left on the shoulders of the the people who have no skills in research. And this is an important part for us being Muslim and Pakistani and huge content is being generated. Please Ma'am look into this. Like you have a great lecture on Urdu citations etc. Allah Paak apko jaza daay ga. Thank you very much
@@ResearchTube my pleasure ma'am App Assest hain. I have seen online lectures of research for about two years and attended physical lectures at Arizona state university in USA. Beaconhouse Pakistan but I must appreciate your style .
![Triangulation in research [Meaning, Types, Examples]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Q6q1RL22o74/mqdefault.jpg)
Thank you so much, I feel much clear after watching clip. Even better than the class lecture . Hope my professor doesn't see my comment :-P
Quite helpful 👍
Thank you for sharing ❤️ A very brief & impressive presentation. I love the use of animations.
Very easily explained, thank you very much. It was very helpful
The so-called deductions are also the result of inductions.
Thank you so much maam
This is brilliant! You explained it really well.
Another fantastic informative video. Thank you 🙌🏼
beautiful video
This was one of the best simplified explanations yet. Thank you.
no still confusing
The example about the coffee being tasty technically exemplified abductive reasoning, and abductive reasoning is by no means less common than deduction and abduction. Rather, its formalization systems are less developed and less explicitly utilized. However, as Charles Sanders Peirce noted, all coherent sensory perception involves abductive reasoning. Your perception of words on a screen is actually the conclusion of an abductive argument. You see words on the screen because you unconsciously reason these specific words being on a screen is the best explanation for the patterns of variation within your visual qualia. And of course, distinction between and within sensory phenomena is itself deductive argumentation, and unconsciously associating those distinctions with past distinctions per common patterns is inductive argumentation.
In truth, all three types of reasoning are used in a continuous stream of argumentation that constitutes you as a being.
Finally removed the confusions about these three logics.
Thanks Ma'am.
jon will be ptomoted soon,since he's working here for longer than the others
this senctence is which kind of arguements deductive or inductive?
and with explanations
please .....
Oh God! Adam need not be rich! The original premise was false so the conclusion is false!
Thank you for making this video, Loved it!
Mam you looks like a pakistani actress. God swear wo apki dito copy he but mujhe uska name nahe yaad arha, mostly wo rony waly scenes krti he dramas mei
اب نام یاد کرکے بتاو
This is a great video. The only thing I wish we would avoid as scientists is using the word "theory" in this way. This gives people that say "evolution is just a theory" credence. The cell theory - all living things are made of cells and all cells come from pre-existing cells, is hardly something that needs further scientific support. :)
It was quite difficult for me to determine between Abductive and Deductive when creating certain examples. Would this be considered an example abductive or deductive. Pluto is made out of blue cheese. Everything made of blue cheese is tasty. Therefore, Pluto is tasty. It does seem to be a valid argument.
Thanks for your comment. This example is about deduction, in abduction minor facts are always missing and we can only make intelligent Guess, in deduction, theory guides us for making assumptions or hypothesis
@@ResearchTube thank you for your fast reply and clear explanation how to distinguish them both. So this argument can also be considered valid and unsound ?
Yes it is valid argument
WOW such an informative and illustrative video, many thanks in Botswana
How to write the justification of using qualitiative method (say content analysis) when reasoning is deductive? As you said, deductive approach generally deals with qauntitative data.
Thank you for this clarification, google is just confusing me
Am not clear mom, how did you conclude by finding 11 ?
Are there any pdf of 20-30 pages
Which pdf u r asking?
Caption is necessary to better understand audio
Very useful information thnku
🙏🙏
Thank you for the impressive content
Very "to the point" explanation...
Thank you so much for the wonderful explanation. How to choose between Inductive and Abductive in qualitative research?
When choosing between inductive and abductive approaches in qualitative research, it is important to consider the nature of the research question and the data that is available. If the research question is exploratory and the data is rich and complex, an inductive approach may be appropriate to identify patterns and themes that can be used to develop new theories.
However, if the research question is more focused and specific, and there is already a theoretical framework to work from, an abductive approach may be more suitable to test hypotheses and theories.
It is also important to consider the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. Inductive approaches are often considered more flexible and open-ended, but may be criticized for lacking theoretical grounding. Abductive approaches, on the other hand, may be more structured and rigorous, but may also be criticized for being too narrow in focus.
Ultimately, the choice between inductive and abductive approaches will depend on the specific research question, the available data, and the researcher's theoretical and methodological preferences.
Thank you for sharing and knowledge.
EXAMPLE OF DEDUCTIVE REASONING
Most of the students visit UAF Library to consult theses and dissertations. It was observed that a group of MPhil students of Agronomy visited the library multiple times last week. Therefore it may be deducted that MPhil students are visiting UAF Library most frequently these days to consult theses on Agronomy.
Great summary, thanks!
Super Explanation thanks a lot
Thank you for sharing
is abduction kidnapping?
You are a born teacher ☺️
Very good quality
Thank you so much.
very well explained
Wow
Wonderful explanation
A comprehensive presentation with helpful animations. Thank you
Thank you so much
Respected Madam. Could you please guide whether following is correct example of inductive reasoning?
EXAMPLE OF INDUCTIVE REASONING
In an observation, libray staff noted that 7 out of 10 students of BS programs at UAF were using the Wikipedia as primary source of information. Later the same was found true in case of M.Phil. students as well. Therefore it was deducted that majority of UAF students consider Wikipedia as primary source of information.
Yes, but correct that it is inducted
@@ResearchTube Thanks Madam. You are right. Mistakenly I wrote deducted in description.
i wanted this one
Great animations with impressive teaching methods always great Mam
Good one dear!
Nice effort to clear the concept of reasoning
Very nice
Really appreciable, keep it up...
Thanks for clarifying the difference. One small doubt - can we use deductive method to study existing theories in qualitative research? Appreciate your help.
The approach would be deductive if you want to study existing literature but in qualitative we use inductive
salute you maam
Which reasoning is used in scientific method, deductive or inductive?
Deductive
Thanks
Good👍
Good one
your channel is the inspiration for me, and I am looking forward to starting my channel, but I don't have that much expertise like you. you are an institute maam
When a person committed he/she can be a team, best wishes
@@ResearchTube how can we be part of team. You are a leader and we can just follow as a team
Nice sharing 👍
Thank you ♥️
Yh kaisay video bnati hai aap?aap zaroor bataye
I will share my experience in my future video
Abduction is usually used in content analysis(Krippendorff,2004) all these citations are learned here in your channel ma'am, before this, I was totally a layperson. you have given me a track
Thanks please share other potential topics you want to learn
Sure ma'am. Ma'am plz guide that how do Hadiths are being cited. Their referencing and their plagiarism etc. If required for hadiths. Ma'am you know this area is left on the shoulders of the the people who have no skills in research. And this is an important part for us being Muslim and Pakistani and huge content is being generated. Please Ma'am look into this. Like you have a great lecture on Urdu citations etc. Allah Paak apko jaza daay ga. Thank you very much
@@ResearchTube my pleasure ma'am App Assest hain. I have seen online lectures of research for about two years and attended physical lectures at Arizona state university in USA. Beaconhouse Pakistan but I must appreciate your style .
Gostei. Parabéns.
Life saving prior to a very important test. Thank you very much, all the way from México!!! Suscribed.
Thank you. You can share the link with your class fellows and teachers.