Pleased to hear you found it helpful! Definitely join my fb group if you’re getting value from our training. We have more longer form masterclasses and live workshops where you can even submit your questions and research for our direct feedback
It was a useful video sir, but the timestamps need to be updated, i guess they are from other video. Thank you for making these videos, they are really helpful.
you work at 100 mph dude lol im jealous… I must learn your ways. i’m incredibly detail-oriented & meticulous and while that’s great for finding logical missteps that most students miss, it’s not the best for research output. I am starting to realize I am quite anxious and inefficient as a result of these tendencies and tend to impress people with a fantastic start to things only to disappoint them with how long I take. I am trying to change this though
I would also look at the publisher. MDPI isn’t predatory, but it is close. They do have a suspiciously high acceptance rate and based on the topics they have sent me to review, they just want a body to provide a review. I’m regularly asked to review terrible papers from well outside my area of expertise. I want to support open access research, but MDPI seems to be more interested in collecting publication fees than publishing good science.
From your title, I assumed the subject was finding missed references in you own papers. It sounds like what you are discussing is finding open research problems. There is some danger with your approach that you will find the obvious ones, which are a bit dangerous because you can do a lot of work and get scooped by someone else. In some fields this won't matter so much, but in a winner-take-all field like mathematics it can be devistating.
The term "research gap" exactly means what he is talking about. But you are right in that his strategy is not independent of his field of research. Research gaps in existing papers only describe small deltas from the achievements. They do not describe alternative approaches or even new fields of research. Moreover, usually you cannot fill the research gap of another group because they already start working on this after submitting the paper and have a better starting position because of their previous research. Often you would want to avoid these incremental "gaps".
📝Click the link to learn more about FastTrack advanced mentorship programmes: www.stucklerconsulting.com
Hi, sir. Nice video. Can i know what your subject speciality is? Am a p.hd student my subject is Education
Excellent video Prof.! Many thanks for it :)
Excellent video. Many thanks.😊
Glad you found it useful! 🙌
Not all papers have ‘study limitations’, so how to find gaps quickly then? Thanks!
Look at future directions in the conclusion section.
This was an incredibly useful video that helped me conclude literature gaps for my research after days of struggling. Thank you very much!
Pleased to hear you found it helpful! Definitely join my fb group if you’re getting value from our training. We have more longer form masterclasses and live workshops where you can even submit your questions and research for our direct feedback
Really appreciate this tip. Please provide one on the problem statement that indicates thesis, anti-thesis and synthesis.
It was a useful video sir, but the timestamps need to be updated, i guess they are from other video.
Thank you for making these videos, they are really helpful.
thanks for letting me know! should now be fixed :)
Thank you for sharing Research Gaps In Under 5 Minutes.
That's a great video, Prof. David. Keep up this amazing work!
you work at 100 mph dude lol im jealous… I must learn your ways. i’m incredibly detail-oriented & meticulous and while that’s great for finding logical missteps that most students miss, it’s not the best for research output. I am starting to realize I am quite anxious and inefficient as a result of these tendencies and tend to impress people with a fantastic start to things only to disappoint them with how long I take. I am trying to change this though
Join our Facebook group!! We have a ton of valuable support and we can chat directly about hacks to boost your productivity
Fantastic 🙏
Interesting. Thanks for sharing.
Very helpful and thanks
Dr. Stuckler, how many research gaps can one identify from a particular research paper?
Off to a strong start! 00:24 - "Nooo eh, you cannot eh find eh research gaps eh in eh five eh minutes." 😆Great and entertaining video!
Glad you enjoyed it 😁
I did eh! The Italian-English bit was totally unexpected and hilarious. You took a risk and it paid off! Multo bravo 👏
Very helpful
Excellent lecture 👍👍
Just in case a paper has not put limitations,how can I find the gap?
Find a comparable one -
Methodological limitations
These limitations are related to the methodology used in the study.
Scarcity of existing research
This is when there is little or no previous information or findings on the subject being studied.
Impact limitations
These limitations are related to the design of the research or the methods used to ensure validity.
Self-reported data
This data is limited because it can't be independently confirmed in most cases.
Selection bias
This bias is identified when the population that the study is based on is not representative or accurate.
Thank you Sir
I would also look at the publisher. MDPI isn’t predatory, but it is close. They do have a suspiciously high acceptance rate and based on the topics they have sent me to review, they just want a body to provide a review. I’m regularly asked to review terrible papers from well outside my area of expertise. I want to support open access research, but MDPI seems to be more interested in collecting publication fees than publishing good science.
Do we need to cite the sources of these gaps
A good one
You're very welcome! 🙌
Great video
@profdavidstuckler
How can I generate a researchable topic for a PhD thesis sir?
Thanks
Good supportive information
From your title, I assumed the subject was finding missed references in you own papers. It sounds like what you are discussing is finding open research problems. There is some danger with your approach that you will find the obvious ones, which are a bit dangerous because you can do a lot of work and get scooped by someone else. In some fields this won't matter so much, but in a winner-take-all field like mathematics it can be devistating.
The term "research gap" exactly means what he is talking about. But you are right in that his strategy is not independent of his field of research. Research gaps in existing papers only describe small deltas from the achievements. They do not describe alternative approaches or even new fields of research. Moreover, usually you cannot fill the research gap of another group because they already start working on this after submitting the paper and have a better starting position because of their previous research. Often you would want to avoid these incremental "gaps".
My supervisor died whom will i discuss gaps
А вроде так то и связки стабильно выходят) КУЛЛ
I'm Italian... We don't really talk like that, come on!!!!