If you'd like to see more, you can watch full episodes of Creation in the 21st Century with David Rives for free on the TBN app: watch.tbn.org/creation-in-the-21st-century-with-david-rives/
I could never believe in the Big Bang theory! When I look at my own body, brain, heart, the birth process, etc., the vastness of the universe, the variety of life on the planet on land and sea, DNA, individual finger print, design and order, just to name a few; how can I not believe in The God of Creation. Trying to imagine some amoeba in the water evolving and then becoming different things over time is just so inconceivable, hardly worth my time and intelligence. God is The Great I Am, truly the heavens declare His glory.
Ok, first there is no proof of those religions existing and second before you tell me Christianity is faith. Yes it's just that. But it's like this... When I wake up right I have a sense that there is SOMEONE there. The same thing when. I know I'm doing quite obviously wrong. There is no other explanation than. It's god And cause there's ALOT of evidence to suggest this. Its undeniably clear. THERE'S A GOD.
@@simeonhill2172 and yes we have proof of those religions existing, we have statues of gods from different pantheons that predate the foundation of Christianity
Thank you, gentlemen. Especially you, David. I hope your father is well. I learned allot from your early work: The Heavens Declare The Glory of God. What I find tenaciously pompous, gentlemen, is how atheism's theoretical investigations always begin with a tone of humility and a language leading us to believe they have a teachable spirit. Nothing could be further from the truth. Instinctively they cloak their rage against GOD in the garb of science. This has always been the devil's game. And over time every unproven theory transforms (evolves) into demanding their theory be accepted as undeniable fact. And this is then taught to our children who, not having any skills in critical thinking are as clay in the potter's hand.
I am not a theologian, but I was raised as a Christian. Therefore, I accepted the Gospels as historical records. However, what the Genesis narrative tells us of the beginning aligns differently with what science teaches. So, as a result, I accepted the story of creation on faith. Later, as an adult, I read a popular science magazine article about the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) and how its data reveals that our Earth and solar system may be cosmically aligned. Then there is the Planck satellite confirming the WMAP data. Could this be evidence that the book of Genesis is based on historical events? Perhaps, but unfortunately, I am not a scientist and can only understand about one percent of the science. Nevertheless, according to cosmologists, one thing is evident, the alignments somehow exist! Moreover, because these features do not fit the Standard Model of Cosmology, scientists dubbed it the Axis of Evil. But, as reported by Genesis, would these alignments be the Axis of Beginning? Did WMAP and the Planck satellites' data of the cosmic microwave background reveal a universe aligned with the Earth and solar system that may show Genesis as history? This may be the reason scientists are so silent concerning this disturbing discovery. How come there is so little dialogue? And are these abnormalities contrary to the Copernican principle? How does this information support the Big Bang? Could these alignments reveal a possible cosmic model of Intelligent Design showing an actual Axis of Beginning?
The Gish gallop is a rhetorical technique in which a speaker attempts to overwhelm the listener by an excessive number of arguments, without regard for the accuracy or strength of those arguments. The term is named for Duane T. Gish, who used the technique frequently when challenging the scientific fact of evolution. It is similar to a method used in formal debate called spreading. Get out your hip waders, it's running high and deep here. It's really sad that men like this can so easily deceive and dupe the ignorant.
Great content with information on the event horizon and how time is unique to the location. I agree that "pixie dust" magic should be confronted in the development of the universe. The significant battles for science are; the soft tissue found on T-Rex, the answer to the universe's time (Event Horizon), and Mount St. Helen's carving 1/40 scale of the Grand Canyon in an afternoon. All these challenge the inflated and hard-to-understand timeline being forced upon our society.
The late astronomer, Halton Arp, found that redshift is an intrinsic property and shouldn't be assumed to be a measure of velocity. Read his book "Seeing Red: Redshifts, Cosmology and Academic Science". What this means is that the Universe is not expanding, It would appear that the universe is more "cell like" with galaxies giving birth to other galaxies.
As a muslim we can support the big bang. As God referenced it as a starting point for the creation of the universe, Allah says in the Quran "we have made every living thing with water" that can be broken down with years worth of research from scientists. Throw evolution theory out the window, Allah tells us that he is always creating one of his beautiful names is "the innovator" or "the Inventor" we dont need a theory we have God and science can explain the creation of God in depth because Allah has allowed mankind to develop and progress acquire knowledge so we can see and understand the creation and its wonders, secrets and complexities with the signature of intelligent design. Not by chance!
Once again leaving out a substantial part of the science and theories behind the big bang. He's hoping you know very little about cosmology and will just believe what he says.
You know the funny thing is. You should look at what God said. In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. To me that signifies that the heaven may be the canopy that covered what the earth would become. Or it could be the canopy that holds the planets in place. The actual beginning. Either way the earth is the second oldest physical object in the known universe. For the sun and moon were made on the 4th day. He made the stars also
Not saying religion has any part in this, but whenever someone brings up a creator people get butthurt and try to refute and dismantle that argument. In my opinion it’s just as crazy and asinine to continually make up “theories” and false “mathematics” to try and “prove” something happened in the first place. Than to even consider the possibility of a “creator”.
God is beyond all understanding and existence in time unknown, he is the beginning and the end of all things that do exist. He is beyond and before the things that do exist...lol
I find it difficult to take seriously someone who has to mock the other side whe making their argument, He said "magic pixie dust" about dark matter. Why must he make a joke of the fact that science works by creating g a theory and then doing the work to prove or disprove it. And why can't both be true, that is, that God created everything and expanded it to become what we have today? Most bible writings can be taken as metaphors. They are descriptions based on what man knew back 1000 or more years before Jesus came.
I love all the scientific half-truths at work here. Throw a couple of cosmology terms out there to sound convincing, yet absolutely bringing nothing of substance. Came here for an interesting theory, left as a disappointed physicist.
If you'd like to see more, you can watch full episodes of Creation in the 21st Century with David Rives for free on the TBN app: watch.tbn.org/creation-in-the-21st-century-with-david-rives/
Why would the Earth be without form and void?
I could never believe in the Big Bang theory! When I look at my own body, brain, heart, the birth process, etc., the vastness of the universe, the variety of life on the planet on land and sea, DNA, individual finger print, design and order, just to name a few; how can I not believe in The God of Creation. Trying to imagine some amoeba in the water evolving and then becoming different things over time is just so inconceivable, hardly worth my time and intelligence. God is The Great I Am, truly the heavens declare His glory.
wait so you are admitting that you are too stupid to understand the science so youre just gonna believe a random book
"Wonders without number." This verse in Job will be held "for ever and ever. Amen."
For all the unbelievers who doesn’t believe in Gods creation, will one day see the truth that God is our creator, God bless 🙏🏻✝️🕊💜
How do you explain religions that predate christianity?
Ok, first there is no proof of those religions existing and second before you tell me Christianity is faith. Yes it's just that. But it's like this... When I wake up right I have a sense that there is SOMEONE there. The same thing when. I know I'm doing quite obviously wrong. There is no other explanation than. It's god And cause there's ALOT of evidence to suggest this. Its undeniably clear. THERE'S A GOD.
That's what I know anyway
@@simeonhill2172 can you tell me the evidence?
@@simeonhill2172 and yes we have proof of those religions existing, we have statues of gods from different pantheons that predate the foundation of Christianity
WOW..how could anyone doubt God exists when they see the awesome Wonders of the universe!
Thank you, gentlemen. Especially you, David. I hope your father is well. I learned allot from your early work: The Heavens Declare The Glory of God.
What I find tenaciously pompous, gentlemen, is how atheism's theoretical investigations always begin with a tone of humility and a language leading us to believe they have a teachable spirit.
Nothing could be further from the truth. Instinctively they cloak their rage against GOD in the garb of science.
This has always been the devil's game. And over time every unproven theory transforms (evolves) into demanding their theory be accepted as undeniable fact. And this is then taught to our children who, not having any skills in critical thinking are as clay in the potter's hand.
My guy gary
Thank you, We are all well here!
I am not a theologian, but I was raised as a Christian. Therefore, I accepted the Gospels as historical records. However, what the Genesis narrative tells us of the beginning aligns differently with what science teaches. So, as a result, I accepted the story of creation on faith. Later, as an adult, I read a popular science magazine article about the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) and how its data reveals that our Earth and solar system may be cosmically aligned. Then there is the Planck satellite confirming the WMAP data. Could this be evidence that the book of Genesis is based on historical events? Perhaps, but unfortunately, I am not a scientist and can only understand about one percent of the science. Nevertheless, according to cosmologists, one thing is evident, the alignments somehow exist!
Moreover, because these features do not fit the Standard Model of Cosmology, scientists dubbed it the Axis of Evil. But, as reported by Genesis, would these alignments be the Axis of Beginning? Did WMAP and the Planck satellites' data of the cosmic microwave background reveal a universe aligned with the Earth and solar system that may show Genesis as history? This may be the reason scientists are so silent concerning this disturbing discovery. How come there is so little dialogue? And are these abnormalities contrary to the Copernican principle? How does this information support the Big Bang? Could these alignments reveal a possible cosmic model of Intelligent Design showing an actual Axis of Beginning?
The Gish gallop is a rhetorical technique in which a speaker attempts to overwhelm the listener by an excessive number of arguments, without regard for the accuracy or strength of those arguments. The term is named for Duane T. Gish, who used the technique frequently when challenging the scientific fact of evolution. It is similar to a method used in formal debate called spreading. Get out your hip waders, it's running high and deep here. It's really sad that men like this can so easily deceive and dupe the ignorant.
Great content with information on the event horizon and how time is unique to the location. I agree that "pixie dust" magic should be confronted in the development of the universe. The significant battles for science are; the soft tissue found on T-Rex, the answer to the universe's time (Event Horizon), and Mount St. Helen's carving 1/40 scale of the Grand Canyon in an afternoon. All these challenge the inflated and hard-to-understand timeline being forced upon our society.
The late astronomer, Halton Arp, found that redshift is an intrinsic property and shouldn't be assumed to be a measure of velocity. Read his book "Seeing Red: Redshifts, Cosmology and Academic Science".
What this means is that the Universe is not expanding, It would appear that the universe is more "cell like" with galaxies giving birth to other galaxies.
As a muslim we can support the big bang. As God referenced it as a starting point for the creation of the universe, Allah says in the Quran "we have made every living thing with water" that can be broken down with years worth of research from scientists. Throw evolution theory out the window, Allah tells us that he is always creating one of his beautiful names is "the innovator" or "the Inventor" we dont need a theory we have God and science can explain the creation of God in depth because Allah has allowed mankind to develop and progress acquire knowledge so we can see and understand the creation and its wonders, secrets and complexities with the signature of intelligent design. Not by chance!
Once again leaving out a substantial part of the science and theories behind the big bang. He's hoping you know very little about cosmology and will just believe what he says.
Extremely interesting 👍🏻✝️
Glad you think so!
They get time dilation wrong. Hours even says he doesn’t understand it, then proceeds to use explain it incorrectly.
One of my favorite shows
Thank you, Jean!
These guys are good
23% if the Universe is dark matter. What a stupid statement. How did they measure this?
Anyone fancy a pint?
As long as it’s dark
You know the funny thing is. You should look at what God said. In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. To me that signifies that the heaven may be the canopy that covered what the earth would become. Or it could be the canopy that holds the planets in place. The actual beginning.
Either way the earth is the second oldest physical object in the known universe. For the sun and moon were made on the 4th day. He made the stars also
Not saying religion has any part in this, but whenever someone brings up a creator people get butthurt and try to refute and dismantle that argument. In my opinion it’s just as crazy and asinine to continually make up “theories” and false “mathematics” to try and “prove” something happened in the first place. Than to even consider the possibility of a “creator”.
God is beyond all understanding and existence in time unknown, he is the beginning and the end of all things that do exist. He is beyond and before the things that do exist...lol
I find it difficult to take seriously someone who has to mock the other side whe making their argument, He said "magic pixie dust" about dark matter. Why must he make a joke of the fact that science works by creating g a theory and then doing the work to prove or disprove it. And why can't both be true, that is, that God created everything and expanded it to become what we have today? Most bible writings can be taken as metaphors. They are descriptions based on what man knew back 1000 or more years before Jesus came.
I love all the scientific half-truths at work here. Throw a couple of cosmology terms out there to sound convincing, yet absolutely bringing nothing of substance. Came here for an interesting theory, left as a disappointed physicist.
🤦♂️
Well done
🤣🤣🤣
Is this a prank ?
I believe in genesis and that evolution is a religion in itself
How is evolution a religion?
You guys need a sanity check.
Do they
If you seriously believe men are made of mud and women were created from a mans rib you clearly need help
Right aaaaand your Boris Johnson bud
It's a bit more complicated than what you've just claimed but sure mate
It is more complicated, we evolved
Complete ignorance if you don’t understand the science you are scrutinising, you’re talking absolute garbage