What does Noah Have to do with our Salvation? | CREATION with David Rives

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 61

  • @suzaniovieno2023
    @suzaniovieno2023 Рік тому +2

    Thank you so much for this wonderful information I loved it 😇👍🙏. Praise God our father 🙏❤️

  • @wondery6693
    @wondery6693 9 місяців тому +1

    Very interesting and informative

  • @davidtodd5686
    @davidtodd5686 4 роки тому +2

    Well, have you heard of the ice-man? There is speculation that he is Cain. The Ice-Man is the oldest corps found to my knowledge... he was found underneath a glacier & from the pollen on him discovered the path he has just been... could you do his chromisone?

    • @stevesutcliffe3490
      @stevesutcliffe3490 Рік тому +1

      There is speculatiion he is Cain amongst rekigious idiots. Meanwhile, the scientists just get on with their work...

  • @ogloc6308
    @ogloc6308 2 роки тому

    Shem, Ham and Japheth are "different races" right? The point about Noah's sons having a huge amount of mutations makes total sense because he is the oldest human dad in history.

  • @micahramsay8890
    @micahramsay8890 2 роки тому +2

    Luke 3:21-38
    King James Version
    21 Now when all the people were baptized, it came to pass, that Jesus also being baptized, and praying, the heaven was opened,
    22 And the Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape like a dove upon him, and a voice came from heaven, which said, Thou art my beloved Son; in thee I am well pleased.
    23 And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,
    24 Which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Janna, which was the son of Joseph,
    25 Which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Amos, which was the son of Naum, which was the son of Esli, which was the son of Nagge,
    26 Which was the son of Maath, which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Semei, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Juda,
    27 Which was the son of Joanna, which was the son of Rhesa, which was the son of Zorobabel, which was the son of Salathiel, which was the son of Neri,
    28 Which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Addi, which was the son of Cosam, which was the son of Elmodam, which was the son of Er,
    29 Which was the son of Jose, which was the son of Eliezer, which was the son of Jorim, which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi,
    30 Which was the son of Simeon, which was the son of Juda, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Jonan, which was the son of Eliakim,
    31 Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of Nathan, which was the son of David,
    32 Which was the son of Jesse, which was the son of Obed, which was the son of Booz, which was the son of Salmon, which was the son of Naasson,
    33 Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, which was the son of Juda,
    34 Which was the son of Jacob, which was the son of Isaac, which was the son of Abraham, which was the son of Thara, which was the son of Nachor,
    35 Which was the son of Saruch, which was the son of Ragau, which was the son of Phalec, which was the son of Heber, which was the son of Sala,
    36 Which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad, which was the son of Sem, which was the son of Noe, which was the son of Lamech,
    37 Which was the son of Mathusala, which was the son of Enoch, which was the son of Jared, which was the son of Maleleel, which was the son of Cainan,
    38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.

  • @Freddy-Da-Freeloadah
    @Freddy-Da-Freeloadah 2 роки тому +1

    This analysis dose not take into account VIRULUTION. With DNA mutations transmitted by viruses, it would not matter who your father was. Or is the Y chromosone immune to Virolution? IMHO

  • @miaminight5637
    @miaminight5637 4 роки тому +8

    I've told my kids even though adam and Eve were our first parents, Noah and his wife are our 2nd parents, we came from him and his family. God bless 💜🙏🕎🕊

    • @Goblinshoestore
      @Goblinshoestore 3 роки тому

      yeah you'd probably look like Hagrid

    • @xernokai4507
      @xernokai4507 3 роки тому +1

      How stupid can a human be

    • @micahramsay8890
      @micahramsay8890 2 роки тому +1

      This video is dumb. Noe has DNA of Adam which comes down the DNA line from generation to generation so this video does not make any logical or biological sense.
      Luke 3:21-38
      King James Version
      21 Now when all the people were baptized, it came to pass, that Jesus also being baptized, and praying, the heaven was opened,
      22 And the Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape like a dove upon him, and a voice came from heaven, which said, Thou art my beloved Son; in thee I am well pleased.
      23 And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,
      24 Which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Janna, which was the son of Joseph,
      25 Which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Amos, which was the son of Naum, which was the son of Esli, which was the son of Nagge,
      26 Which was the son of Maath, which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Semei, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Juda,
      27 Which was the son of Joanna, which was the son of Rhesa, which was the son of Zorobabel, which was the son of Salathiel, which was the son of Neri,
      28 Which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Addi, which was the son of Cosam, which was the son of Elmodam, which was the son of Er,
      29 Which was the son of Jose, which was the son of Eliezer, which was the son of Jorim, which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi,
      30 Which was the son of Simeon, which was the son of Juda, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Jonan, which was the son of Eliakim,
      31 Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of Nathan, which was the son of David,
      32 Which was the son of Jesse, which was the son of Obed, which was the son of Booz, which was the son of Salmon, which was the son of Naasson,
      33 Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, which was the son of Juda,
      34 Which was the son of Jacob, which was the son of Isaac, which was the son of Abraham, which was the son of Thara, which was the son of Nachor,
      35 Which was the son of Saruch, which was the son of Ragau, which was the son of Phalec, which was the son of Heber, which was the son of Sala,
      36 Which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad, which was the son of Sem, which was the son of Noe, which was the son of Lamech,
      37 Which was the son of Mathusala, which was the son of Enoch, which was the son of Jared, which was the son of Maleleel, which was the son of Cainan,
      38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.

    • @2l84me8
      @2l84me8 2 роки тому

      So you lied to your kids by telling them they came from impossibly long lines of incest?

    • @michaelflagulant
      @michaelflagulant 10 місяців тому

      ​@@micahramsay8890this guy was arguing that how many mutations we have in the world, spreads very quickly. therefore a young earth vs. old earth. since old earth would mean we would be severly mutated to the point of advanced cancer when born. i think it makes perfect sense. also, the mutations lead back to a single tree very quickly (6,000 years).

  • @2l84me8
    @2l84me8 2 роки тому +1

    There never was a noah. Sorry, but humanity didn’t originate from a 600 year old mythical man that inbreed with his own daughters.

    • @knightclan4
      @knightclan4 2 роки тому

      You are able to think that Noah was myth, but you might want to keep your mind open.
      I used to think that, but the evidence contradicts that thinking.

    • @2l84me8
      @2l84me8 2 роки тому +1

      @@knightclan4 Just about every piece of scientific and archeological evidence disproves the noah character. You have the nerve to imply I’m close minded while providing no evidence whatsoever.

    • @knightclan4
      @knightclan4 2 роки тому

      @@2l84me8
      Somebody that says Noah "never" existed and was not there to confirm that statement is close minded.
      You can never prove whether he existed or not.
      You can only assume.
      Like I said, I used to be an old earth, evolutionary thinking bias scientist.
      I am quite well aware that some evidence points towards your thought process.
      It is called Uniformitarianism.
      The school system has brainwashed society into believing scripture is myth and fairytale.
      I happen to believe that a single catastrophic global flood in addition to catastrophic plate tectonics caused the world as we know it.

  • @bethteer1509
    @bethteer1509 3 роки тому

    Is Noah & his family NOT Decendants of Adam & Eve??? I understand the thinking of the Great Flood wiping out almost all life on earth, yet still Noah & family decended from Adam's Y genome, right??

  • @sydfreed9818
    @sydfreed9818 3 роки тому

    The jews are from one brother juda of 12 sons of jacob who was changed to Isreal the father. 10 brothers hiers got spread out into the world when the assyrians defeated the 10 northern tribes and took them into captivity. 100 years later the tribe of juda and levi were conquered by the babylon and 70 years later were aloud to go back and settle in Jerusalem and rebuild the temple. GOD said to Abraham that he would be the father of many nations and people like the sands of the sea and that is all of us who spread out to the west. We are from the 10 tribes of Isreal and it only makes sense. Paganism is an unbiblical faith, practice and worship of the God of the Bible not a people.

  • @stevesutcliffe3490
    @stevesutcliffe3490 Рік тому

    Errr...nothing, because he didn't exist? Do I get the points?

  • @christiandehaes8493
    @christiandehaes8493 3 роки тому +1

    wait....
    If we have y chromosomes till noah because we (males) are all his descendants, and noah HAS to be a descendant of adam (that fact you can't deny): give me any reason why noah would not have the y chromosome of adam..
    Don't you see some strange dissonances in that claim ?????

    • @BackwardsR3LLIK
      @BackwardsR3LLIK 2 роки тому

      Lmao youre looking at this yoo logically. To understand you need to do 3 things
      1- listen
      2- ignore logic
      3- accept it as true
      😂

  • @palladin1337
    @palladin1337 4 роки тому +5

    'What does Noah have to do with our Salvation?'
    Literally nothing, since the evidence mostly points to him being a fictional character. Even if he did exist, the overwhelming majority of the story around him is patently false, so he still has absolutely no real impact on our lives.
    'How are Noah and Adam and Eve related?'
    They're in the same book, and star in equally impossible stories which violate known principles of reality. Oh, and they're supposed to be human.
    By the way, are you ever going to bring someone in who's actually unbiased on these topics and/or is a true specialist on whatever you're talking about?
    Or are you going to keep leaning on biased individuals from unrelated fields of study?

    • @idaahtoong9028
      @idaahtoong9028 4 роки тому +4

      without Noah.. we would not be here. without obedience we would not be here. Noah is a link to salvation

    • @idaahtoong9028
      @idaahtoong9028 4 роки тому +2

      WITH GOD ALL THINGS ARE POSSIBLE...

    • @TimothyChapman
      @TimothyChapman 4 роки тому +1

      You are definitely here to keep people from investigating the evidence presented in this video.

    • @palladin1337
      @palladin1337 4 роки тому +2

      @@idaahtoong9028 'without Noah.. we would not be here'
      This would be plausible if any one part of the Noah story were true. Unfortunately, none of it is.
      A ship that size could never have been made of only wood and remained structurally intact.
      It could never have held enough animals to revive their populations after the supposed flood.
      It could never have held enough food (both planet and meat) to keep the animals alive for the amount of time claimed.
      There is literally no geological evidence that such a flood even took place. Furthermore, such an event would have drowned every land-based plant on Earth before salting the ground and ensuring that *nothing* would grow there for a considerable amount of time.
      Finally, the biological bottleneck that would have been created by trying to rebuild populations from a *single* mating pair of animals, or even just Noah's family, would have been so narrow that they likely would have died due to disease and/or genetic degradation from inbreeding.
      This is a story about all land-based life basically dying, and probably even most aquatic species due to the mass mixing of salt and fresh water. The only thing that makes it work (and I use the word 'work' *very* loosely here) is a literal appeal to magic.

    • @palladin1337
      @palladin1337 4 роки тому +2

      @@TimothyChapman There is no evidence here, only the same circular argument Creationists have been making ever since they first started bitching about scientific discoveries. The fact that he 'interviews' people on the payroll of Creationist organizations instead of experts not directly tied to their group demonstrates just how dishonest he is.