World Anvil!: www.worldanvil.com/ I hope I convince you that this class ain't that bad... If not, then I'm sorry for the song. PATREON: / xptolevel3 TWITTER: / xptolevel3 DISCORD: / discord
Realistically they have no practical effect. One archetype is completely useless (yes the beastmaster) and overall the ranger is only good for gloomstalkee
And the thing is, favored enemy is basically useless even when you DO have whatever monster type in your campaign, unless your quest consists of exclusively tracking and remembering information about them
Honestly, it sounds like your DMs are assholes, or maybe uncreative with the ability. I've used favored enemy multiple times to ask the DM what I know of this enemy, and when I found out what I needed, shared with the party and created strategies to easily kill our quarry. Granted, I tailored my favored enemy to Giants in a campaign explicitly dealing with them, but I've never had a DM try to screw a party member over because of something they chose for their class.
My favourite part is the prospect of pinging for dragons you weren't expecting, and now you just have to worry about how there's at least one dragon somewhere within ~5 miles of you in potentially any direction that may or may not be aware of you too.
Sadly, when the credits roll, nobody will remember the guy who helped them track down the enemy, who fed them when they were hungry and helped prevent good gods how many ambushes. They'll remember how your damage was subpar and how a fighter with the archery fighting style would've done a better job putting additional pins into the enemies.
yeah that's because you can buy rations, the rogue can take expertise in survival and the druid can get a 25 passive perception or the wizard can scout ahead with fin familiar.
@@caleb7006 yes but you can run out of rations (or they could go off) and you don't always know what the party composition is going to be, a party with no rogue, no wizard (at least a wizard without find familiar) and no ranged fighter can really benefit from having a Ranger . . . as far as perception goes the more people with a good perception the better.
@@caleb7006 expertise in survival does not keeps party from getting lost chief, and a bunch more stuff. Btw, check the revised ranger and use Xanathar subclasses. Boom And, Hunter's mark
@@yearnie4207 I don't disagree with that statement completely, but as put into 5th edition currently, it is extremely difficult to make rangers work in places where druids or fighters don't already function Yes you can have fun with a ranger, and I've seen people have fun with rangers in the past (Laura Bailey on Critical Role for example played a fantastic ranger) but in their current place in 5th edition Jocat's statement rings true to me personally
Which is why, when I tried multicasting a Ranger with a Hexblade...yeah, it was weird as fuck, I could do a bit of everything but no thing perfectly It was awesome and pretty powerful actually, I recomend you try it, but yeah, complicated as fuck
I want to multiclass a ranger and bard for my first character (I haven't played before) to fit backstory and make it just a bit more versatile coz sometimes bards are kinda useless... and also I want a songbird and a wolf-dog if thats possible. I don't know if it is....
I find the ranger comes into its own in gritty realism campaigns. The ability to hunt, survive and track in the wilderness is incredibly useful when you have to make a 3 week trek through the wilderness and can only carry 10 days worth of food/water.
This is acyually what I hope to do once I get to play Dream scenario is a sword and shield ranger with realistic deinonychus animal companion... but I need to hope in a lenient DM that is ok with letting me homebrew some stuff
@@Birbucifer What are the possibilities of making a "versatile" ranger that is also capable of shooting arrows? Knowing perfectly well that it will end up doing both worse, but I'm thinking the adaptability might be worth it (and most importantly cool)
myky992 If you wanna lean more into the martial aspect, I would ask your DM if you could be a Revised Ranger and then go with the Hunter subclass, and then ask your DM if you could prepare your spells like Rangers should already do. You will never do as much DPS as any of the other classes post level 5 BUT you will be a pretty good supplement spellcaster/skirmisher. Also, if your team ever needs some phat sneaks and someone is in heavy armor, you’ll have (hopefully) Pass Without Trace prepared, to make up for the disadvantage on those checks.
Funnily enough, I would prefer Favored Enemy if I was at level 20 and Favored Foe 1-19. Foe Slayer is much stronger than people give it credit for, adding up to +5 to your damage or, more importantly, accuracy. Actually hitting the enemy is one of the most important things for DPR. Lvl 20 Ranger vs Tiamat: 25 AC 20 dex, +3 weapon: +14 to hit. Necessary roll: 11 That's a 50% chance to hit. Now add Fiend as Favored Enemy and 20 Wis: +19 to hit. Necessary roll: 6 That's a 75% chance to hit. You still get this benefit from Favored Foe, but at the cost of Concentration and you only ever have 6 uses between long rests.
@@Aredel a bunch of additional optional class features, the fey wanderer subclass which is basically the charisma ranger (a bunch of advantages with charisma stuff); the swarmkeeper subclass which gives you a swarm of insects/birds/anything you choose really and they help you in combat, deal extra damage, pick you up and give you flying speed; and it also adds an extra beastmaster feature where instead on having an actual living animal you conjure a sea, land or sky spirit like creature called primal companion which has its own statblock and overral is pretty cool
There's one more thing that Tasha's added to Rangers that gets overlooked. The Druidic Warrior fighting style. It allows you to take two Druid Cantrips. I absolutely recommend choosing Shillelagh as one of those, since Rangers get Extra Attack at 5th level. After that, you'll always have a reliable source of magic damage.
The Ranger a.k.a. ‘session 0 is a must.’ From what all of the skill sets in rules of a ranger implies. That you need to have a good repertoire with your DM. You can’t wait until the first session reveal your backstory to everyone including the DM. You need to let your DM know that you’re playing a Ranger so you can work together to decide what would be best for your characters, favorite train and preferred enemy. Essentially, if you’re going to play a rogue, the DM needs to be your ally, not your enemy.
@@Vaprous Aragorn had a bow in fellowship and the company of Rangers led by Faramir all had Longbows, plus there's other media about Rangers that generally has them use bows (but each to their own I guess).
How many other people went into this video expecting it to be a 20 second video saying "So you wanna play a ranger huh, well don't." Then the rest of the time was just elevator music over some sponsorship/patreon stuff.
If you think about it, both Vesemir and Geralt are rangers themselves since they can use both weapons and magic in a fight, they're skilled in monster behavior and weakness, also they can just be as effective towards humans and other races, and they're experts on alchemy from gathering various ingredients from plants and creatures
Dude, you’ve been Level 3 forever. Your DM must have some harsh XP requirements, have you tried going to the Ethereal Plane with a bunch of NPC’s and grinding? It might help speed up the process
“Hmmm dwarf friend?” “Aye Bebop?” “Bebop feels it has been many, many days since personal growth. Reason?” “Hmmm. Haps’ we should head on down to them fancy-ass elven mages and have them poof’ us on over ta tha ghosty place. Killin’ a few of those nasty buggers makes me feel mir’ powerful.” “Okay dwarf friend.”
@@l-gzy7400 grinding? Grinding?!? GRINDING?!?!?!?! GGGGGRRRRRIIIIIEEENNNNDDDDIIIMNNNNGGGG GGGGGRRRRRIIIIIEEENNNNDDDDIIIMNNNNGGGG GGGGGRRRRRIIIIIEEENNNNDDDDIIIMNNNNGGGG No, stop it. This isn't a video game, your dm should melt your dice and use the slag to ruin your character sheet.
I love being able to teleport when I teleport, then I teleport again when I attack and my DM hates me, Horizon Walkers are hilarious. They're now I'm over here, made you look! Now you have 3 arrows in your back!
I don't really have a funny joke or anything, I just wanna say the new look of these "How to Play" look really nice and it always brings a smile to my face hearing Jacob yelling about something Edit: When will these songs be on Spotify or SoundCloud ?!
Not just ranged weapons: fighters can use literally any weapon in the game. Crossbows, lances, spears, daggers, bastard swords, battle axes, war maces, flails, swords, bows, and if the setting has them included firearms of some sort, I guarantee you the fighter is the one that's going to use them. Also they happen to be the class that gets the best subclass for setting up for mounted combat(so they can play a mounted knight etc) and finally, more importantly: they get a subclass called the arcane archer, which should really read "better ranger class".
An underrated thing about Rangers is that a) they have no arcane focus, meaning their hands can be free to hold weapons, and b) they only have a handful of spells that have material components with a gold cost.
DM: "I'm planning on making a kind of mystery Zombie apocalypse one shot for next Friday. Y'all will need 5th level characters" Me, making a Ranger with Undead as favored enemy and knowing I'll have that Track Undead spell to immediately figure out where the zombies are coming from: *this is where the fun begins*
I actually have a ranger in a campaign I dm, they've been in the group for about 9 months now, and in all that time they used hunter's mark a grand total of zero times, because they had it, and knew how good it was, but forgot to activate it every single time. We did not forget to take the piss out of them for this, but then, in the last session we played, they finally remembered to use hunter's mark! Yay!! So then the fight continues as normal and then about 2/3 of the way to the end of the fight I hear them say 'oh fuck I've been forgetting to add my hunter's mark damage' so the one and only occasion they actually used it, and they forgot about it again immediately after. They later had enough fight, and the ranger forgot to cast hunter's mark entirely again
@@madanotap6492 rangers aren't that hard to play and hunter's mark is THE ranger spell, and if they forgot about it all the time why not change it for a spell they actually use
@@XPtoLevel3 Yes but one is used for archery and the other is for a violin, obviously the ranger and the bard are playing different classes than they actually are I real life. You know like a game, where you play a role, like bounty hunter of Masterchef!
Now I really want to make a Rogue that has Orcs and Drow as their Favored Enemies not to kill them, but because they have a fetish for those races and uses the language and tracking abilities to hunt down and seduce some green/grey bootie. ...maybe multi-class with bard too.
I had a DM who kept track of a giant overworld map and made exploration of various terrain an integral part of the campaign. It made playing Ranger so much fun.
I change one thing about the beast master that made it really fun, it doesn’t consume your action to make it take an attack (it can only do one action on your turn). It’s a night and day difference that just makes it so much easier to remember and work with the class
Man Jacob has a lot of patrons... but you can't multiclass into different warlock subclasses, and what if your patrons have different demands or goals? We need answers, Jacob.
I’m still grinding XP for level 4. I’m currently three levels in Bard, I don’t know what all these patrons are doing trying to get me to cross class in a warlock
I dknt think there's anything stopping you multi classing I to the same class you just don't get twice the spells or anything onlt the bonus subclass abilities.
I've played a beast master ranger, and my DM let me choose an animal companion completely outside of the rules set in the book. I feel that this completely made the ranger function better.
6:04 I actually decided to go with Hunter for a Ranger I decided to make. The DM is adamant against guns, so he has a hand crossbow. Horde Breaker along with the Crossbow Expert feat is so powerful and I didn't even mean for that to happen lol
I play a kenku beast master in Adventurer's League as Mordecai and Rigby. Sure, Rigby dies a lot, but he always comes back after 8 hours. My goal is to collect the rest of the Regular Show characters using Conjure Animals and by collecting Bags of Tricks and Figurines of Wondrous Power.
Мясная Жижа I'll get an item of commanding elementals, probably fire because he's always angry. I already have a necklace that can summon an owlbear once per day and I flavor him as Skips.
Jacob: takes my favorite class in the entire game and rips it to a million pieces then spits on its grave by calling Beastmaster, my preferred archetype, a piece of garbage Me: LOOK HOW THEY MASSACRED MY BOY
I've always wanted to give ranger a chance but I always see it getting absolutely obliterated at every turn. I know your comment is 2 years old but I was wondering; what about it makes it your favourite class?
@@lydiac9118 the roleplaying aspect. I love Ranger archetypes from classics like LOTR or even more modern portrayals of Rangers in today's military. They're not tanky barbarians with tons of hit points or rogues who hit every shot but they're masters of their terrain. I just love the idea of a character who can see things others can't and whose skills allow them to pass unharmed and undetected in any environment. Also I love having familiars (my best ranger character had a pet boar who I was very fond of)
@@chimerazeta1714 thanks for the reply! I can definitely get a sense for a different angle on the class now :)! My group right now is definitely more combat and rp focused and spend a lot of time in towns or on/in modes of transport, which is personally what makes ranger hard for me to play because, well, what tends to make them great ties a lot into being in a natural setting. That being said, I think I'll give them a go next time we're running a oneshot with this angle in mind!
@@lydiac9118 Depends on your level, really. Playing Ranger levels 1 to 2 is an anxiety filled nightmare because it's we when you unlock your subclass (paired with Tasha's Guide stats) that the class comes online as a versatile powerhouse that can give Fighters and Rogues a run for their money.
As someone who has actually done archery I had a serious knee jerk moment when I saw him carrying that bow... The bow string is on the wrong side of the bow.
My dm loves rangers. He doesn’t understand how monk works. He doesn’t know how paladins work. He has played dnd for 7 years. **i think I need a new party**
NinjaBluefyre he doesn’t understand how flurry of blows works. Thinks that martial arts applies to each hit, hitting twice every time. He doesn’t know you get *one* bonus action. Not 30. He also had no idea what lay on hands is.
Swarmkeeper might be my fave but I think Beastmaster and Hunter are still useful. Revised BM anyway, but despite mostly focusing on offensive options, the Hunter is arguably the most durable ranger archetype, as it has the most options to directly prevent the Ranger from taking damage.
Having been in the America infantry, a ranger is literally the best class to play for something like that. A ranger runs point, knows the terrain, is a great warrior, studies and learns. I have so much appreciation for rangers
I really like rangers not for any of the stuff then can do but for the fact that in terms of role play they are one of the few classes that is just straight up someone who goes on adventures.
@@rayar3234 i know we practiclly gave hunter subclass eye of the god and ultra focus as spells that can be used one needed specal points called gods points one per use and the other just a short rest the first one allowed you to get the lvl 20 bonus on enything you are curently fighting (ultra focus) and the other showed you every living ( dosent work on undead) creature in 100 feet. Other than that we got a paladin gave him balista and made him yell BALISTA MOUNTED AND LOADED every time he used it he was our lord tachanka(rainbow six siege refrence )
This is the first time ever i comment a youtube video... this is hillarius and the song at the end is EPIC! You are great and keep going with your channel!
I played a Tiefling horizon walker in the Descent into Avernus module. His name was Tobias Brand and he was by far the most fun character I’ve ever played. It was the first time I had ever played a chaotic evil character and it just so happened that I wrote into his backstory that he was simping hard for Zariel. Needless to say, some shit went down and one of the party members took his kneecaps as a trophy after he fell victim to power word kill.
On behalf of all gm's i would like to say that all these rules are hard to keep track of and unless we have made a map we are NEVER going to use travel pace. Thank you for listening -to my ted talk-
I agree with that one nerd here. Foraging, tracking, all of that booze is so complex. I only really do it if there is nothing else to do then that and maybe throw in a random encounter while it goes on. For example, in curse of Strahd, our ranger wanted to play a beastmaster. So while they escort Ireena to vallaki, they make a side stop to collect herbs. Once thats done with, Strahd himself will gift the ranger a wolf. Talks to the party and in the final battle the wolf is torn between Strahd and the Ranger.
Horizon walkers can also work well outside of a planar portal type game. Just so long as the dm agrees that you can sense all portals. The BBEG tries to teleport away you know exactly where their going, and can pick up their tracks from there.
In recent times I've been warming up to the idea of the ranger being a druidic archetype of other classes. Like a fighter subclass that's a nature-y alternative to Eldritch Knight
The UA Ranger is in my Top 5 Favourite Classes, but the Vanilla Ranger is my least favourite next to the Warlock Also, Revised Beast Master is the dopest and cutest shit ever
@@thelandofnod2269 warlock does make a great villain class IMO. running a slightly altered version of Volo's "warlock of the great old one" for my current arc's villain
Well considering that most range dmg comes from either magic or equipment, like grenades, the most unique thing about the ranger class imo is the fact that they are the only class that can viably do physical dmg from range. Very useful for those situations where you're fighting something that's resistant to magic with immobilizing abilities. Ijs
A good way to play a ranger would be to play a cartographer, an explorer in the employ of a noble who wants him to map a region. Lots of backgrounds can help this idea out
I have played ranger many times in my life and i really liked the players handbook subclasses the hunter is so good and its really fun having an animal with you
The gloomstalker doesn't just get an extra d8, they get an extra attack that does an extra d8 on top. Aslo Xanathar fixed favored enemy to add hit and damage.
Honestly, I actually really like the PHB beastmaster. Yeah it’s a little extra work but that’s what got me into DnD. My first class was 3.5 druid. I like doing extra research, putting time into planning ahead, keeping track of details, and overall I enjoy classes that allow me to play into those aspects of the game.
The rangers major niche is to be situationally useful, making it so in the right senecio you have a lot of utility but outside of that situation you are far less powerful, this idea is very captured by the hunter subclass (which is actually a pretty good one btw) which grants bonuses in certain senecios in combat like an extra attack if enemies are close together, or a +4 AC against enemies with multiattack, showing that in certain situations the ranger can be very powerful but otherwise less useful, a niche no other class really fills outside of some out of combat utility spells having a similar feel like identify or illusory script.
You can’t sneak attack with a greatsword, it’d be better to take three levels of scout for the expertises and cunning action and the rest Horizon Walker Haste and Hold Monster.
@@TomoeNageX or instead of a greatsword dual wield 2 shortswords or scimitars instead (or 2 rapiers if you take the Dual wielder feat, although I would re-flavour the rapier as Sai or Stilletto blades etc... because dual wielding Rapiers is ludicrous), the Rogues sneak attack has to use either a finesse weapon or a ranged weapon it doesn't say anything about having to use dexterity (I know ranged weapons must use dexterity but with finesse weapons give you a choice) so you could make a strength based Rogue but you would be spreading yourself pretty thin multiclassing into ranger (strength for attacking, dexterity for stealth, acrobatics and the almighty Dexterity saving throw and wisdom for perception and survival . . . and constitution too for survivability) . . . . At this point just picking a different more suitable race like Halfling, Gnome, Half-Elf, Human or Wood-Elf would make things much easier
I had a friend that was making a new char after the death of his previous one. He picked ranger with grasslands as his favored terrain. Literally on the next session a horde of orcs fended the party off to a desert where the whole second chapter of the campaign would pass
"That's kind of it. You basically've been studying groups or type of creatures so that you can understand them and hunt them." It may just be because it's 2:30 a.m., but I misheard that "hunt them" part as "hug them." This has given me the idea of being a literal park Ranger and "keep them [park goers and general creatures/people] from walking into stupid areas." The ranger would also work magical search and rescue.
“Beast Master Sucks” You’re Right but also, I Want A Pet Goddamnit! For me beastmaster is the roleplay subclass. Like sure, I could be good at the game. But also I could be a red skinned tiefling with black and gold eyes, looking like the literal embodiment of the nine hells, and travel with a sleek blank panther who growls and anybody who dares speak to me, while being the absolute sweetest person ever. I wish they’d put more focus on the team aspect of the beastmaster subclass, and maybe added a balanced animal levelling system so your companion can fight a level 10 enemy with you without getting one hit KO’d
You should look up he UA Artificer battle Smith they get a companion that "levels up" with you (I think they are making the Artificer official in their next book)
I'm playing a Tabaxi Lv.2 ranger/Lv.1 rogue for an assassin/sniper build. Hunters mark and sneak attack are a pretty nice combo so far. And with the Tabaxi Feline Agility trait zooming around the map can make some interesting strategy. It's really fun! I recommend the multiclass.
@@supercalifragic1551 pretty much. I think Matt *might have* even homebrewed some rules to make it better, but it still wasn't enough (don't quote me on that)
Check out World Anvil and create your free account today!
www.worldanvil.com/
I was literaly looking for you ranger vid a few hours ago. Hmmm, something smells fishy.
Wheres the How to Monk video?
DO THE MONK GUIDE. NOW.
Hey hey that's an actually helpful advertisement I will use that.
As john mack said, you have the bow strung backwards. Just google "step though method bow" and you'll see how to string it
Isn’t the purpose of favored enemy and explorer to choose the one enemy and terrain type that will never ever show up in the whole campaign?
Realistically they have no practical effect. One archetype is completely useless (yes the beastmaster) and overall the ranger is only good for gloomstalkee
If you talk about your favoured enemy enough your DM will intentionally not put them in the campaign just to spite
And the thing is, favored enemy is basically useless even when you DO have whatever monster type in your campaign, unless your quest consists of exclusively tracking and remembering information about them
if only there were official variant rules that adressed that problem and made Rangers on par with most other classes.
Honestly, it sounds like your DMs are assholes, or maybe uncreative with the ability.
I've used favored enemy multiple times to ask the DM what I know of this enemy, and when I found out what I needed, shared with the party and created strategies to easily kill our quarry.
Granted, I tailored my favored enemy to Giants in a campaign explicitly dealing with them, but I've never had a DM try to screw a party member over because of something they chose for their class.
"Ranger, find the zombies!"
"Yes."
"You found the zombies?"
"No, I just confirmed there are undeads somewhere within a five mile radius."
i feel like theyre able to track them down like without magic anyways, just that the ability makes em know theyre nearby
There are hot single undeads in your area
@@Shemagh4 “Oh let me just put on my face.”
exploring avernus
"there seem to be fiends somewhere"
My favourite part is the prospect of pinging for dragons you weren't expecting, and now you just have to worry about how there's at least one dragon somewhere within ~5 miles of you in potentially any direction that may or may not be aware of you too.
Sadly, when the credits roll, nobody will remember the guy who helped them track down the enemy, who fed them when they were hungry and helped prevent good gods how many ambushes.
They'll remember how your damage was subpar and how a fighter with the archery fighting style would've done a better job putting additional pins into the enemies.
yeah that's because you can buy rations, the rogue can take expertise in survival and the druid can get a 25 passive perception or the wizard can scout ahead with fin familiar.
@@caleb7006 yes but you can run out of rations (or they could go off) and you don't always know what the party composition is going to be, a party with no rogue, no wizard (at least a wizard without find familiar) and no ranged fighter can really benefit from having a Ranger . . . as far as perception goes the more people with a good perception the better.
@@caleb7006 expertise in survival does not keeps party from getting lost chief, and a bunch more stuff. Btw, check the revised ranger and use Xanathar subclasses. Boom
And, Hunter's mark
That's because ours didn't prevent an ambush and now we're all dead
@@caleb7006 you just admitted it takes three people and lots of money to do the same as one guy
"Just play a fighter with a bow, it's way better" - JoCat
My only problem with that is that i think rangers are given a bad rep. But i think you can have a fun time with one if you try
@@yearnie4207 I don't disagree with that statement completely, but as put into 5th edition currently, it is extremely difficult to make rangers work in places where druids or fighters don't already function
Yes you can have fun with a ranger, and I've seen people have fun with rangers in the past (Laura Bailey on Critical Role for example played a fantastic ranger)
but in their current place in 5th edition Jocat's statement rings true to me personally
“If you play fighter, you’re boring”
-JoCat
@@djsalad5752 Agreed
For me it's "just play a rogue with the outlander background"
The ranger is basically a multiclass boiled down to a single class.
Which is why, when I tried multicasting a Ranger with a Hexblade...yeah, it was weird as fuck, I could do a bit of everything but no thing perfectly
It was awesome and pretty powerful actually, I recomend you try it, but yeah, complicated as fuck
Pérez Ortega Valentín just out of curiosity, what was the level to level ratio of classes
But worst.
@@Rylus bratwurst?
NO!
BUTTWORST
I want to multiclass a ranger and bard for my first character (I haven't played before) to fit backstory and make it just a bit more versatile coz sometimes bards are kinda useless... and also I want a songbird and a wolf-dog if thats possible. I don't know if it is....
6:04 I picked Beast Master :(
I had a giant wolf-spider. His name was Mittens.
That’s adorable
The use of past tense here makes me sad. Is Mittens okay? :(
IS MITTENS OK I WANT TO KNOW TOO
*T E L L U S I F M I T T E N S I S O K A Y W E N E E D T O K N O W*
Creeps omg, hey
...What happened to Mittens?
I find the ranger comes into its own in gritty realism campaigns. The ability to hunt, survive and track in the wilderness is incredibly useful when you have to make a 3 week trek through the wilderness and can only carry 10 days worth of food/water.
4:07
"This is my FAVORITE TERRAIN!"
I died there
Earth, Wind, and *FAAAIIIYAA* .
Never change.
Do you remember
@@BigDictator5335 The 21st Night! SEPTEMBAH!
Praise!
@@ashenwuss1651
\[T]/
Sunlight Sage Love was changing the minds of pretenders
Pick Ranger class
Everyone: okay
Use melee only.
Everyone: WTF
This is acyually what I hope to do once I get to play
Dream scenario is a sword and shield ranger with realistic deinonychus animal companion... but I need to hope in a lenient DM that is ok with letting me homebrew some stuff
I made a Viking ranger who uses a battleaxe
Rangers traditionally go melee so that isn’t far fetched at all.
Currently playing a strength Ranger that dual wields longswords.
@@Birbucifer What are the possibilities of making a "versatile" ranger that is also capable of shooting arrows? Knowing perfectly well that it will end up doing both worse, but I'm thinking the adaptability might be worth it (and most importantly cool)
myky992 If you wanna lean more into the martial aspect, I would ask your DM if you could be a Revised Ranger and then go with the Hunter subclass, and then ask your DM if you could prepare your spells like Rangers should already do.
You will never do as much DPS as any of the other classes post level 5 BUT you will be a pretty good supplement spellcaster/skirmisher.
Also, if your team ever needs some phat sneaks and someone is in heavy armor, you’ll have (hopefully) Pass Without Trace prepared, to make up for the disadvantage on those checks.
Xanathar's was great for rangers, but Tasha's is insane for them! Can't wait to play a swarm keeper with all the alternative class features!
Funnily enough, I would prefer Favored Enemy if I was at level 20 and Favored Foe 1-19. Foe Slayer is much stronger than people give it credit for, adding up to +5 to your damage or, more importantly, accuracy. Actually hitting the enemy is one of the most important things for DPR.
Lvl 20 Ranger vs Tiamat: 25 AC
20 dex, +3 weapon: +14 to hit.
Necessary roll: 11
That's a 50% chance to hit.
Now add Fiend as Favored Enemy and 20 Wis: +19 to hit.
Necessary roll: 6
That's a 75% chance to hit.
You still get this benefit from Favored Foe, but at the cost of Concentration and you only ever have 6 uses between long rests.
THEY FIXED BEAST MASTER! *YESSSSSS*
What kind of stuff does Tasha’s add?
@@Aredel a bunch of additional optional class features, the fey wanderer subclass which is basically the charisma ranger (a bunch of advantages with charisma stuff);
the swarmkeeper subclass which gives you a swarm of insects/birds/anything you choose really and they help you in combat, deal extra damage, pick you up and give you flying speed;
and it also adds an extra beastmaster feature where instead on having an actual living animal you conjure a sea, land or sky spirit like creature called primal companion which has its own statblock and overral is pretty cool
There's one more thing that Tasha's added to Rangers that gets overlooked. The Druidic Warrior fighting style. It allows you to take two Druid Cantrips. I absolutely recommend choosing Shillelagh as one of those, since Rangers get Extra Attack at 5th level. After that, you'll always have a reliable source of magic damage.
The Ranger a.k.a. ‘session 0 is a must.’
From what all of the skill sets in rules of a ranger implies.
That you need to have a good repertoire with your DM.
You can’t wait until the first session reveal your backstory to everyone including the DM.
You need to let your DM know that you’re playing a Ranger so you can work together to decide what would be best for your characters, favorite train and preferred enemy.
Essentially, if you’re going to play a rogue, the DM needs to be your ally, not your enemy.
HOW TO PLAY RANGER
Step 1: Bow
Congrats, now you're a ranger!
Don't forget to wear a hooded cloak!
Step 1: Horizon Walker
Step 2: Sword and Board
Congrats, now you're a good ranger!
Honestly that's just a sterotype born from a misinterpretation of who was the ranger in LOTR(Hint: it wasn't the elf archer)
@@Vaprous Aragorn had a bow in fellowship and the company of Rangers led by Faramir all had Longbows, plus there's other media about Rangers that generally has them use bows (but each to their own I guess).
@@spectre8131 Rangers Apprentice
How many other people went into this video expecting it to be a 20 second video saying "So you wanna play a ranger huh, well don't." Then the rest of the time was just elevator music over some sponsorship/patreon stuff.
And then go on to talk about the Unearthed Arcana update.
mood but true
Tyler Troutman disappointed at the lack of “Dont” at the start
Hunter Mearo OHHHHHHHHHHH ONE OF MY KIND?
I'm literally begging here. Please upload all the class songs as individual videos also. I love these
If you think about it, both Vesemir and Geralt are rangers themselves since they can use both weapons and magic in a fight, they're skilled in monster behavior and weakness, also they can just be as effective towards humans and other races, and they're experts on alchemy from gathering various ingredients from plants and creatures
YeS But THe REvisED BeaSTMasTer IS GoOd
I knew these comments would be here...
very true. Vanilla is dull
Personally i like it! Lot of opportunity for roleplay, and as a gnome/halfling you can ride your beast
@@majikkarp177 or goblin
@@XPtoLevel3 Honestly, from what I've seen of Vanilla Beast Master, it works great if you use Flanking rules, because it's free advantage...
Dude, you’ve been Level 3 forever. Your DM must have some harsh XP requirements, have you tried going to the Ethereal Plane with a bunch of NPC’s and grinding? It might help speed up the process
finnvidz hey, say it in character or its planar dreadnoughts for you
L- GZY Shit, sorry. Ummm.... ok, I got it!
...
...
...
...
I forgot what my character voice was
“Hmmm dwarf friend?”
“Aye Bebop?”
“Bebop feels it has been many, many days since personal growth. Reason?”
“Hmmm. Haps’ we should head on down to them fancy-ass elven mages and have them poof’ us on over ta tha ghosty place. Killin’ a few of those nasty buggers makes me feel mir’ powerful.”
“Okay dwarf friend.”
He is using milestone leveling with the Great Old One named Larry as DM. Good luck leveling xD
@@l-gzy7400 grinding? Grinding?!? GRINDING?!?!?!?! GGGGGRRRRRIIIIIEEENNNNDDDDIIIMNNNNGGGG
GGGGGRRRRRIIIIIEEENNNNDDDDIIIMNNNNGGGG
GGGGGRRRRRIIIIIEEENNNNDDDDIIIMNNNNGGGG
No, stop it. This isn't a video game, your dm should melt your dice and use the slag to ruin your character sheet.
I heard you like teleporting so I played an Eladrin horizon walker so I can teleport on my teleports when I teleport.
It's a shame it can't use blink thou
I love being able to teleport when I teleport, then I teleport again when I attack and my DM hates me, Horizon Walkers are hilarious. They're now I'm over here, made you look! Now you have 3 arrows in your back!
Find a ring of spell storing or something with blink and go crazy on a group of enemies
@@djmccarthy4859 man that's sounds perfect for if you're doing shadow the hedgehog as a character
Yo we heard you like teleports, so we put a teleport in your teleport so you can teleport while you teleport.
Now with Tasha's Cauldron of Everything resulting in ranger actually getting revised, I would like to see an updated video for the ranger.
It gave them buffs they didn't need, they're already just better fighter
I don't really have a funny joke or anything, I just wanna say the new look of these "How to Play" look really nice and it always brings a smile to my face hearing Jacob yelling about something
Edit: When will these songs be on Spotify or SoundCloud ?!
We need to know
When you realize that fighters can use ranged weapons.
And thst an arcane archer is arguably a better ranger than a ranger.
Not just ranged weapons: fighters can use literally any weapon in the game. Crossbows, lances, spears, daggers, bastard swords, battle axes, war maces, flails, swords, bows, and if the setting has them included firearms of some sort, I guarantee you the fighter is the one that's going to use them. Also they happen to be the class that gets the best subclass for setting up for mounted combat(so they can play a mounted knight etc) and finally, more importantly: they get a subclass called the arcane archer, which should really read "better ranger class".
:0
Vaperius
But do they get hunter’s mark? I don’t think so!
Tom Forge And that’s saying alot cos Arcane Archer is considered to be pretty underwhelming.
An underrated thing about Rangers is that a) they have no arcane focus, meaning their hands can be free to hold weapons, and b) they only have a handful of spells that have material components with a gold cost.
DM: "I'm planning on making a kind of mystery Zombie apocalypse one shot for next Friday. Y'all will need 5th level characters"
Me, making a Ranger with Undead as favored enemy and knowing I'll have that Track Undead spell to immediately figure out where the zombies are coming from: *this is where the fun begins*
Just don't forget Hunter's Mark!
I actually have a ranger in a campaign I dm, they've been in the group for about 9 months now, and in all that time they used hunter's mark a grand total of zero times, because they had it, and knew how good it was, but forgot to activate it every single time. We did not forget to take the piss out of them for this, but then, in the last session we played, they finally remembered to use hunter's mark! Yay!! So then the fight continues as normal and then about 2/3 of the way to the end of the fight I hear them say 'oh fuck I've been forgetting to add my hunter's mark damage' so the one and only occasion they actually used it, and they forgot about it again immediately after. They later had enough fight, and the ranger forgot to cast hunter's mark entirely again
@@madanotap6492 rangers aren't that hard to play and hunter's mark is THE ranger spell, and if they forgot about it all the time why not change it for a spell they actually use
@@thefracturedbutwhole5475 mostly because they'd just forget to use that spell as well.
@@thefracturedbutwhole5475 mostly because they'd just forget to use that spell as well.
@@madanotap6492 that's why I try to use spells that have a more immediate effect, like zephyr strike and steel wind strike.
your bow is strung the wrong way
Your bow is strung the wrong way
@@XPtoLevel3 Yes but one is used for archery and the other is for a violin, obviously the ranger and the bard are playing different classes than they actually are I real life. You know like a game, where you play a role, like bounty hunter of Masterchef!
lol I feel you
@@Pantjay barcher
@@e4ehco21 Oh so FF14 Bard (I wish I was kidding, but the Final Fantasy 14 Bard is an Archer who uses poison arrows and songs)
Now I really want to make a Rogue that has Orcs and Drow as their Favored Enemies not to kill them, but because they have a fetish for those races and uses the language and tracking abilities to hunt down and seduce some green/grey bootie.
...maybe multi-class with bard too.
Why is this comment so ignored. Like Bruh da faq?
You sir have just given me the way to play a joke character I made who wants to do the dew with everything that he physically can.
Just pick Entertainer as your background
Hell yeah.
that sounds super gross and predatory, shame on you.
I had a DM who kept track of a giant overworld map and made exploration of various terrain an integral part of the campaign. It made playing Ranger so much fun.
I died at "You don't have to be a rip-off version of Drizz't". Thank you for that.
Surely #1 reason people play rangers
@@drdiscostu Never understood the concept of rangers dual wielding myself.
“Dont play a ranger in waterdeep dragonheist”
... oops
My Waterdeep Party had 2 Rangers
"The coolest aspect of ranger is in his spells"
My ranger with a reach weapon: * dragonball vanishing sounds *
I change one thing about the beast master that made it really fun, it doesn’t consume your action to make it take an attack (it can only do one action on your turn). It’s a night and day difference that just makes it so much easier to remember and work with the class
Man Jacob has a lot of patrons... but you can't multiclass into different warlock subclasses, and what if your patrons have different demands or goals? We need answers, Jacob.
I’m still grinding XP for level 4. I’m currently three levels in Bard, I don’t know what all these patrons are doing trying to get me to cross class in a warlock
I dknt think there's anything stopping you multi classing I to the same class you just don't get twice the spells or anything onlt the bonus subclass abilities.
He just has one patron with ADHD and multiple personality disorder. He’s basically a bard/feylock.
I'm scared that Jacob will one day snap and kill someone, then change his name to "XP to Level 4"
It's funny cause my bard just got killed last Friday and now I'm playing a ranger this Friday
Griffin Marvelous how did he die
@@Number1tnfan683 a spear straight through the chest. The dm rolled a crit on me. We were only level 2
Griffin Marvelous unlucky
F
I've played a beast master ranger, and my DM let me choose an animal companion completely outside of the rules set in the book. I feel that this completely made the ranger function better.
6:04 I actually decided to go with Hunter for a Ranger I decided to make. The DM is adamant against guns, so he has a hand crossbow. Horde Breaker along with the Crossbow Expert feat is so powerful and I didn't even mean for that to happen lol
I play a kenku beast master in Adventurer's League as Mordecai and Rigby. Sure, Rigby dies a lot, but he always comes back after 8 hours. My goal is to collect the rest of the Regular Show characters using Conjure Animals and by collecting Bags of Tricks and Figurines of Wondrous Power.
How would you do Pops?
Мясная Жижа I'll get an item of commanding elementals, probably fire because he's always angry. I already have a necklace that can summon an owlbear once per day and I flavor him as Skips.
its been the longest time since ive seen regular show, but even then, this plan sounds hilarious and awesome at the same time
@@batangbatugan damn that sounds fun, keep it up
@@batangbatugan Um You're thinking of Benson man.
Jacob: takes my favorite class in the entire game and rips it to a million pieces then spits on its grave by calling Beastmaster, my preferred archetype, a piece of garbage
Me: LOOK HOW THEY MASSACRED MY BOY
I've always wanted to give ranger a chance but I always see it getting absolutely obliterated at every turn.
I know your comment is 2 years old but I was wondering; what about it makes it your favourite class?
@@lydiac9118 the roleplaying aspect. I love Ranger archetypes from classics like LOTR or even more modern portrayals of Rangers in today's military. They're not tanky barbarians with tons of hit points or rogues who hit every shot but they're masters of their terrain. I just love the idea of a character who can see things others can't and whose skills allow them to pass unharmed and undetected in any environment. Also I love having familiars (my best ranger character had a pet boar who I was very fond of)
@@chimerazeta1714 thanks for the reply! I can definitely get a sense for a different angle on the class now :)! My group right now is definitely more combat and rp focused and spend a lot of time in towns or on/in modes of transport, which is personally what makes ranger hard for me to play because, well, what tends to make them great ties a lot into being in a natural setting. That being said, I think I'll give them a go next time we're running a oneshot with this angle in mind!
I just started my first game as a Ranger..
It made me sad. I still love the ranger, though!
@@lydiac9118 Depends on your level, really. Playing Ranger levels 1 to 2 is an anxiety filled nightmare because it's we when you unlock your subclass (paired with Tasha's Guide stats) that the class comes online as a versatile powerhouse that can give Fighters and Rogues a run for their money.
Top notch. Informative, digestible AND engaging. Love this. Thank you.
I’ve been waiting for a how to play on Ranger just because it’s my favorite class, and yes I have been called insane by my friends for that
Xanathar's made rangers cool, not good. Revised made them good, and a bit cooler. Play a revised, use Xanathar subclasses. Boom.
Revised Horizon walker/ Gloom stalker tiefling with fiend as favored enemy = blade.
Revised Horizon Walker. Love it.
Revised Beast Master is pretty dope tho
Still easily the worst subclass, but very cool. I want to play a Druid(Circle of the Shepherd)/Ranger(Beastmaster) multi someday.
Worst as "deals the least amount of damage among all"?
I guess I'll never be able to make maps....
Oh wait, there's World Anvil!
As someone who has actually done archery I had a serious knee jerk moment when I saw him carrying that bow... The bow string is on the wrong side of the bow.
I hoped it was a deliberate joke.
Okay so I wasn't the only one that noticed that.
I wonder if they tried to string the bow and were like “it’s too hard I don’t wanna break the bow”😂😂😂
Really hope they didn't attempt to draw the bow with it strung backwards :o
If you also hate rangers, follow me on twitter.
(This post was made by the Bard Gang)
This post was made by "I roll to seduce the dragons" gang
That's one huge ass Halfling, alright. Three-quarter-ling
Ranger gang rise up
Warlock gang here!
Imagine having countercharm instead of aura of protection.
-This post was made by Paladin Gang
My dm loves rangers.
He doesn’t understand how monk works.
He doesn’t know how paladins work.
He has played dnd for 7 years.
**i think I need a new party**
Mechanically or Conceptually?
Monk: "Ya punch shit!"
Paladin: "Ya smite shit!"
How hard could this be to understand?!
Rooks McGee mechanically.
NinjaBluefyre he doesn’t understand how flurry of blows works. Thinks that martial arts applies to each hit, hitting twice every time. He doesn’t know you get *one* bonus action. Not 30.
He also had no idea what lay on hands is.
@@Hailix4240 did..... did he not read the phb
Your singing for Elements had me dying, very clever
Swarmkeeper might be my fave but I think Beastmaster and Hunter are still useful. Revised BM anyway, but despite mostly focusing on offensive options, the Hunter is arguably the most durable ranger archetype, as it has the most options to directly prevent the Ranger from taking damage.
Escape the Horde + Uncanny Dodge + 20 Dex means you’re not taking damage from shit.
THAT BOW IS BACKWARDS ITS GOMMA EXPLODE IF YOU PULL ON IT TOO HARD
Having been in the America infantry, a ranger is literally the best class to play for something like that. A ranger runs point, knows the terrain, is a great warrior, studies and learns. I have so much appreciation for rangers
@@Ringohulk777cringe
@@rockstoneballs yup. That's me
So glad you guys are keeping your vids going. Love them. Keep then coming. Please!
I really like rangers not for any of the stuff then can do but for the fact that in terms of role play they are one of the few classes that is just straight up someone who goes on adventures.
YES!
The class I played in my very first D&D campaign. Fun times.
You to huh?
Im about to have my first game tomorrow and im gonana be a ranger
@Gracie Waffles are you using the new variant rules?
@Gracie Waffles fair enough, when I first started playing I went through 3 characters before I truly started enjoying it
YEAA we homebrewd the worst class into the best one by looking at the bloodhound from apex legends
MAY *ALLFATHER* GIVE US STRENGTH
@@mr.paperbag771 *I AM THE HUNTER THE GODS HAVE SENT*
That sounds rlly cool dude
@@rayar3234 i know we practiclly gave hunter subclass eye of the god and ultra focus as spells that can be used one needed specal points called gods points one per use and the other just a short rest the first one allowed you to get the lvl 20 bonus on enything you are curently fighting (ultra focus) and the other showed you every living ( dosent work on undead) creature in 100 feet. Other than that we got a paladin gave him balista and made him yell BALISTA MOUNTED AND LOADED every time he used it he was our lord tachanka(rainbow six siege refrence )
@@stefanklepic108 Oh my god, lord Paladhanka kkkkkk
This is the first time ever i comment a youtube video... this is hillarius and the song at the end is EPIC! You are great and keep going with your channel!
thanks for this, ranger is my favorite class and it makes me happy to know others appreciate it as well!
The ranger is kinda like a teenager confused about their sexuality
🤣 From the 90's
How did you guess my actual Ranger character?
@@janelantestaverde2018 that's the bard. "What's your sexuality?" "Yes."
But they can still make art
You mean Legolas? Lol
I played a Tiefling horizon walker in the Descent into Avernus module. His name was Tobias Brand and he was by far the most fun character I’ve ever played. It was the first time I had ever played a chaotic evil character and it just so happened that I wrote into his backstory that he was simping hard for Zariel. Needless to say, some shit went down and one of the party members took his kneecaps as a trophy after he fell victim to power word kill.
That Song in the end hits home. I actually have a +10 to stealth
That song was my favorite thing you've done. I enjoy this content extremely.
Honestly Ranger has use with rules as written. Ive personally never had traveling pace, foraging, or hunting ever come up.
On behalf of all gm's i would like to say that all these rules are hard to keep track of and unless we have made a map we are NEVER going to use travel pace. Thank you for listening -to my ted talk-
@@thechaostornado6600 Yes! This!
I agree with that one nerd here.
Foraging, tracking, all of that booze is so complex. I only really do it if there is nothing else to do then that and maybe throw in a random encounter while it goes on.
For example, in curse of Strahd, our ranger wanted to play a beastmaster. So while they escort Ireena to vallaki, they make a side stop to collect herbs. Once thats done with, Strahd himself will gift the ranger a wolf. Talks to the party and in the final battle the wolf is torn between Strahd and the Ranger.
Country ROOOAAADDSS, take me home, to the PLAACEE I BELOOONGG...
*WEST VIRGINIAAAAAAAA*
MOUNTAIN MAAMAAAAAAAA
Take me home, country roads
Horizon walkers can also work well outside of a planar portal type game. Just so long as the dm agrees that you can sense all portals. The BBEG tries to teleport away you know exactly where their going, and can pick up their tracks from there.
Videos like this are pure gold :D The song especially :D
I freaking love Ranger and also thank you for this. ♡
What's complicated about the revised ranger exactly? It's pretty straight forward.
Right? It's just the original ranger but with 1st level features that you can actually use
Omg yes!!!! I've been waiting for this! :)
Ranger with volley and that sweet crowd control is actually quite good
Ranger has been and always will be my favorite class.
In recent times I've been warming up to the idea of the ranger being a druidic archetype of other classes. Like a fighter subclass that's a nature-y alternative to Eldritch Knight
I subbed to you after the terrain skit. Well done.
4:57
The exact same scenario I bring up when I ask what kind of campaign it's going to be before we start.
The UA Ranger is in my Top 5 Favourite Classes, but the Vanilla Ranger is my least favourite next to the Warlock
Also, Revised Beast Master is the dopest and cutest shit ever
yeah, UA is pretty awesome. I literally built a damage stacking machine with beast conclave
Did you just insult the warlock!
fair enough
@@thelandofnod2269 warlock does make a great villain class IMO. running a slightly altered version of Volo's "warlock of the great old one" for my current arc's villain
@@thelandofnod2269 I love Hexblade but I'm not a fan of the other Warlocks. They're too week and repetitive imo
why don't you like short rest spells?
Well considering that most range dmg comes from either magic or equipment, like grenades, the most unique thing about the ranger class imo is the fact that they are the only class that can viably do physical dmg from range. Very useful for those situations where you're fighting something that's resistant to magic with immobilizing abilities. Ijs
A good way to play a ranger would be to play a cartographer, an explorer in the employ of a noble who wants him to map a region. Lots of backgrounds can help this idea out
I have played ranger many times in my life and i really liked the players handbook subclasses the hunter is so good and its really fun having an animal with you
The gloomstalker doesn't just get an extra d8, they get an extra attack that does an extra d8 on top. Aslo Xanathar fixed favored enemy to add hit and damage.
Honestly, I actually really like the PHB beastmaster. Yeah it’s a little extra work but that’s what got me into DnD. My first class was 3.5 druid. I like doing extra research, putting time into planning ahead, keeping track of details, and overall I enjoy classes that allow me to play into those aspects of the game.
The rangers major niche is to be situationally useful, making it so in the right senecio you have a lot of utility but outside of that situation you are far less powerful, this idea is very captured by the hunter subclass (which is actually a pretty good one btw) which grants bonuses in certain senecios in combat like an extra attack if enemies are close together, or a +4 AC against enemies with multiattack, showing that in certain situations the ranger can be very powerful but otherwise less useful, a niche no other class really fills outside of some out of combat utility spells having a similar feel like identify or illusory script.
Out of all the songs, this is by far my favorite, I'm legit laugh crying
How to play ranger:
Mountain Dwarf
Horizon Walker
Use a greatsword.
Hit level 11
Go 9 levels into Scout Rogue.
I would go 12 and 8 personally. That ASI/Feat can really help
Dont need it with that fat +2 to STR and CON
@@Halfgnomen another feat or ASI is better than not getting it
You can’t sneak attack with a greatsword, it’d be better to take three levels of scout for the expertises and cunning action and the rest Horizon Walker Haste and Hold Monster.
@@TomoeNageX or instead of a greatsword dual wield 2 shortswords or scimitars instead (or 2 rapiers if you take the Dual wielder feat, although I would re-flavour the rapier as Sai or Stilletto blades etc... because dual wielding Rapiers is ludicrous), the Rogues sneak attack has to use either a finesse weapon or a ranged weapon it doesn't say anything about having to use dexterity (I know ranged weapons must use dexterity but with finesse weapons give you a choice) so you could make a strength based Rogue but you would be spreading yourself pretty thin multiclassing into ranger (strength for attacking, dexterity for stealth, acrobatics and the almighty Dexterity saving throw and wisdom for perception and survival . . . and constitution too for survivability) . . . . At this point just picking a different more suitable race like Halfling, Gnome, Half-Elf, Human or Wood-Elf would make things much easier
Ur not walking right I know ima ranger
I'm in love with all da music perfect play on take me home country roads 10 outta 10
These fucking skits kill me every single time I love it keep it up
I think natural explorer should allow you to change your favorite terrain on each long rest similar to restoring spell slots.
I love the Ranger, my favourite class in D&D.
I have a mousefolk with lv3 ranger / lv5 wizard. With lightning spells and lightning arrows. I called him Raichu. I just need him to learn Surf.
I had a friend that was making a new char after the death of his previous one. He picked ranger with grasslands as his favored terrain. Literally on the next session a horde of orcs fended the party off to a desert where the whole second chapter of the campaign would pass
Love the songs and larping!
Honestly just play revised ranger with the new subclasses. There is literally no downside as it just makes the class better.
I am playing as a sith lord in my D&d campaign using the horizont watcher, that shit is legit
Enjoyed the video. Subbed because of the song 🤣
"That's kind of it. You basically've been studying groups or type of creatures so that you can understand them and hunt them."
It may just be because it's 2:30 a.m., but I misheard that "hunt them" part as "hug them." This has given me the idea of being a literal park Ranger and "keep them [park goers and general creatures/people] from walking into stupid areas." The ranger would also work magical search and rescue.
“Beast Master Sucks”
You’re Right but also, I Want A Pet Goddamnit!
For me beastmaster is the roleplay subclass. Like sure, I could be good at the game. But also I could be a red skinned tiefling with black and gold eyes, looking like the literal embodiment of the nine hells, and travel with a sleek blank panther who growls and anybody who dares speak to me, while being the absolute sweetest person ever. I wish they’d put more focus on the team aspect of the beastmaster subclass, and maybe added a balanced animal levelling system so your companion can fight a level 10 enemy with you without getting one hit KO’d
Just take ritual caster and get a fucking familiar.
You should look up he UA Artificer battle Smith they get a companion that "levels up" with you (I think they are making the Artificer official in their next book)
You forgot that Ranger is an INT CASTER
AAAAAHHHH I'VE BEEN DYING FOR ANOTHER OF THESE YES!!!!
I'm playing a Tabaxi Lv.2 ranger/Lv.1 rogue for an assassin/sniper build. Hunters mark and sneak attack are a pretty nice combo so far. And with the Tabaxi Feline Agility trait zooming around the map can make some interesting strategy. It's really fun! I recommend the multiclass.
3:18 I LOST MY SHIT. BEST EARTH WIND AND FIRE REFERENCE EVER.
Vex. Vex made me like rangers. She could have used trinket better but he's her baby so it's cool.
Wasn't she a Beastmaster ranger? But then since beastmaster is shit, she never used Trinket?
@@supercalifragic1551 pretty much. I think Matt *might have* even homebrewed some rules to make it better, but it still wasn't enough (don't quote me on that)
FIIIIIIIIINALLY! A video that doesn’t just slander my favorite, but instead praises it’s strengths and give constructive criticism when needed!
"Track the li- fuck the fuckin kill the lich rangers are rad yee-haw" I'm dying.