I remember watching this scene when they’re looking out on the desert in the cinema thinking I could watch another 2 and a half hours of this like it was nothing. This movie just felt like a long running story I could binge watch for hours.
@@LukeKetchum7003 Part two is worse. Too chaotic sometimes with stupid scenario, or reused monologues from part one. You can feel the moments scenario writers went on strike. Pity.
Jamis taught Paul the ways of the desert. Paul interpreted this prophecy as an Atreides would - an act of kindness and compassion. The reality was the lesson.
@@Izawwlgood Oh okay. Does he also have the ability to see different futures? There was a scene in the movie where he and Jamis were talking and they seem to be friends.
In the beginning of the film, she tells him what to wear. The tables have turned. In addition, Jessica is starting to realize that Paul is becoming a man.
Wait people think this is sexual tension? Do they not realize Jessica never had to wear a stillsuit? Knows literally very little to nothing about the desert. Compared to Paul who did his homework. Combine that with her seeing her son become a very different person within such a short span. Damn people are weird.
Admittedly, even though I didn’t get any sexual undertones, I think it’s because of how this scene was staged. It’s the classic romantic comedy “two people disrobing while coyly checking each other out” shot that we’ve seen dozens of times.
This shows, or hopes to, that Jessica sees that her son is no longer a boy but a full grown man. That has all kinds of implications for them both and she is left to wonder what this is going to lead to since their lives are on the line.
Yes people are weird. They think with their genitalia. Some see sexual innuendo in chair legs, others in telephone poles, and even subway holes... Come to think of it, people are nuts... Opps! Sex, again! GRR!
Yeah, some twisted people thinking that the man and woman have sexual tension--when they are son/mother. Then again, that's a thing in some cultures I guess. Weird indeed.
My dune blue ray is going to melt thanks to clips like this. Any little snippet has me watching the whole movie. I really hope this franchise goes beyond the first book
Unsurprisingly, some viewers misinterpreted House Atreides' (House of Hotties) sexiness. They're in life threatening circumstances and have to put on stillsuits with no accustomed privacy.
Rebecca is really an amazing actress. She's so aloof and in control in many scenes and then suddenly convincingly distraught. In this scene she has that defeated look, we didn't see before, even when she was distressed.
he doesn't have psychic powers. hes prescient, the ability is not complete yet as he hasn't taken the water of life. i would suggest read the book so you dont make ignorant statements
Ok so anotehr excuse for it not being sexual tension. I'm starting to see a trend here. Fans of this movie can't deal with the obvious and are desperately trying to figure out why this scene was so f*cking weird
No, that's now how you walk in the desert. If you do that, you create low-frequency vibrations that attract snakes! Both on Arrakis and on Earth. The way to walk in the Sahara dunes is to glide... you NEVER lift a foot, you slide it, you skate on the sand, that gives the inhabitants of the desert the impression it is SAND that moves, not an animal. In that respect, the movie is terribly badly made! Also, you do not rythme your slides, but break it by changing constantly both direction and length; and you do it slowly. It is NOT a race, it's passing unnoticed that matters. An expert will move with the sand moved by the wind. That way, the movement undertaken by the glider is hidden by the movement of the sand itself.
Maybe just maybe she is watching and copying his action as she doesn't know what to do. he then GLANCES back to make sure she is following along. There is no sexual tension just people projecting their own desires onto a totally platonic scene
Okay anotehr excuse for it not being sexual tension .... dude, you guys just need to get your out of you ass and accept reality. This is a super awkward scene and 100% has super weird and gross sexual tension between a mother and a son. Don't ask me why they did this and not his has nothing to do with the viewers mind AND everything to do with how the scene was filmed. YOu guys actually believe that the director was an idiot... holy cow. Have some respect for his work god damnit!
"breathe through this . . ." and Denis shows the sands move . . . we must learn to breathe through the skin -- no longer take breaths, like Buddhist and Hindu sage do.
I didn't get to see this film . . . because of local politics. I've been looking very often at clips and I can't imagine that Hollywood made a better film than this in that year . . . Best Picture (Academy Awards).
It’s not anything in-universe (Hopefully not but incest does exist in the dune universe, Mother to Som wouldn’t be very far off from Bene Gesserit training) I think what People are picking up on is Rebecca Ferguson looking at Timothee In a way that a Mother shouldn’t. Since IRL, She can find him attractive(like many other older women do and tim is no spring chicken either, but he looks boy-ish) and it’s not a crime for her to want to do ‘some’ things to him.
People really be thinking that his visions of Jamis teaching him the way of the desert came true through him killing the guy. Lads, the guy fucked up somewhere. Think of it as a multichoice playthrough and my boy Paul just sent himself down the very low honor path by failing to avoid the fight and having to kill Jamis. Billions dead, cause he fucked up. This ain't the good guy of the story, ya'll better start getting that.
Paul isn't the good guy, no one in Dune are the "good guys." However Paul didn't cause the Jihad or the death of billions by any specific path or choice he took. In fact he continually moves to make the choices which cause the least suffering. His issue is that every path he sees causes suffering, Jihad and war across the Empire. Paul sees only one path with a positive outcome, but that path also sees Paul become a ruthless tyrant destroying the empire and human society across all of the known universe, so Paul being a good person (he is a good person, even if he isn't "the good guy") cannot face that path, at least not until he is sure there are absolutely no one paths available.
@@NATIK001 An actual "good person" wouldn't delude themselves into believing a vision nobody but themselves can even see and let humanity go down the path of life on it's own. Paul's decisions led to tens of billions butchered, countless planets destroyed and humanity as a whole thrown back into tribal state. If your beloved dog compagnion gets old and sick, you don't show compassion and empathy by wiring it up to a bunch of tubes and forcing it to live on indefinetly in misery for the sole sake to be able to say "I saved it's life, huaha!" but by letting it go to sleep in peace, valueing the time you had together while maintaining it's dignity. Paul is neither a good guy nor a good person. He deluded himself into believing his own lies and that he is trapped by a future nobody but himself was able to form. Saving the human race for the price of it's majority being purged in fire is not a good deed. It's an excuse for violence and spread of suffering.
@@NtoTheM Is that dog metaphor *meant* to imply that Paul and by extension Leto should've let humanity go extinct? I can see where you're coming from if you don't accept the narrative assumption that humanity would have actually suffered in the long run without their actions, but you kind of fail to be convincing when you suggest the better of two options is complete and likely *violent* annihilation. Why are you assuming that humanity's extinction would come peacefully, like the death of a single, sick being, rather than as a result of continuing scarcity and social collapse? Are you really suggesting that all humans dying violently is better than a significant number of humans dying violently, or do you think an extinction-level societal collapse isn't going to be just as violent as the latter?
@@coolguyjki Let me put it real simple for you, that seems to be necessary, unfortunately. Option A: You MAYBE save the collective mankind in the long run by going down the Golden Path. However, this requires you to put humanity through thousands of years filled to the brim with genocide, religious oppression and a complete lack of freedom. The result: You butchered the majority of mankind, murdered countless billions who would'nt have died horribly without your doing, crippling what's left of the race for millenia to come without even having any guarantee that your plan will work out in the long run. Option B: You realise how self-righteous your delusions about the future and some made up prophecies are and let humanity move on, so it may or may not eventually dies out but on the way will suffer 99.9999% less than if you go with Option A. The guy has no guarantee that he even saves mankind by doing what he does. He does it as an insurance policy. He sentences whole civilisations and entire populations to a gruesome death in HIS name as a GOD-KING so the future people MAY be safe from some future calamity after spreading out. To answer the question you try your hardest to paint more complex as it really is: Yes, it is a lot more generous to allow a species to die out the way it is than to convince yourself that putting it through a millenia-long genocide somehow equals saving it. It's like people aren't currently already discussing the invasion of one's own life by others with the ban of abortions. Very same concept. One douchebag thinks himself better than everyone else so he goes and makes decisions for a whole universe knowing he could without ever stopping to think for a second whether he should.
"It's basically a micro-sandwich - a high-efficiency filter and heat-exchange system. The skin-contact layer's porous. Perspiration passes through it, having cooled the body ... near-normal evaporation process. The next two layers . . . include heat exchange filaments and salt precipitators. Salt's reclaimed. Motions of the body, especially breathing and some osmotic action provide the pumping force. Reclaimed water circulates to catchpockets from which you draw it through this tube in the clip at your neck... Urine and feces are processed in the thigh pads. In the open desert, you wear this filter across your face, this tube in the nostrils with these plugs to ensure a tight fit. Breathe in through the mouth filter, out through the nose tube. With a Fremen suit in good working order, you won't lose more than a thimbleful of moisture a day..."
No sh*t, something that is written with hundreds & thousands of pages tell more & better story than a cinematic medium which has a couple of hours. I would like to see the writer try to tell the same quality story in less than 50 pages in total, as detailed, as good, go on, can they? That's what I thought.
I believe it is her reliance on Paul and him becoming more of a leader. She used to care for him, and he is now her principal protector. At least that is how the books describe it. But yeah, kinda off-putting delivery here
@MarvelousMaggie ... dirty minds, dirty thoughts... paraphrasing from Stargate: an honest man stands by the river and hears water but a liar hears lies.
Paul will have to become a fair but ruthless galactic emperor. Emperor Shadam IV made the mistake of being all ruthless with no fairness. Shadam's father, Emperor Elrood, was not an permanent asshole like his son.
People think it's sexual tension, but do realise this movie is full of visions and dream sequences. It's very likely that while she was looking at him, she saw something.
@@VideoMask93 She realizes she can't protect him from what he is destined to become and is literally seeing prophecy unfold before her eyes as well.....difficult for a mother, regardless of her programming, to see her son walking a path she probably wasn't sure she wanted him to travel down....
I interpreted it as her being a bit taken aback by how natural it looked for him putting the suit on. He really is in his element here, which foreshadows him deciding his path lies in the desert rather than off world.
The only difference between the book and movie in this case is that they shortened the period between when Stilgar's group encountered Paul and Jessica and Jamis initiating the fight. In the book, they'd traveled with the Fremen for a few hours and Jamis made the challenge when they rested for the day.
I remember watching this scene when they’re looking out on the desert in the cinema thinking I could watch another 2 and a half hours of this like it was nothing. This movie just felt like a long running story I could binge watch for hours.
Well this is Dune Part One. You could immediately watch Part Two right after.
@@LukeKetchum7003 Part two is worse. Too chaotic sometimes with stupid scenario, or reused monologues from part one. You can feel the moments scenario writers went on strike. Pity.
@@LukeKetchum7003 You know you see I made this comment before it came out, but you're not wrong lol
@@mba2808 reused monologues? it's called a callback... those are entirely on purpose. was that not clear to you lol
@@Jordan-fg9cc It didn’t feel like it. It felt like laziness
Jamis taught Paul the ways of the desert. Paul interpreted this prophecy as an Atreides would - an act of kindness and compassion. The reality was the lesson.
I dont understand that scene. How did Jamis teach Paul the ways of the desert when they have not met prior to them fighting to the death?
@@piob9801 Jamis is the first person Paul kills. He thus teaches Paul the way of the desert: kill or be killed.
@@piob9801 because the way of the desert is death. And in case the detail was lost on you, Paul is has the gift of foresight and can see the future.
@@Izawwlgood Oh okay. Does he also have the ability to see different futures? There was a scene in the movie where he and Jamis were talking and they seem to be friends.
@@piob9801 yeah read my original comment about how Paul filters the prophecy through the lens of the atreides love.
In the beginning of the film, she tells him what to wear. The tables have turned. In addition, Jessica is starting to realize that Paul is becoming a man.
Wait people think this is sexual tension?
Do they not realize Jessica never had to wear a stillsuit? Knows literally very little to nothing about the desert. Compared to Paul who did his homework. Combine that with her seeing her son become a very different person within such a short span.
Damn people are weird.
It's all projection. They have psychological issues.
Admittedly, even though I didn’t get any sexual undertones, I think it’s because of how this scene was staged. It’s the classic romantic comedy “two people disrobing while coyly checking each other out” shot that we’ve seen dozens of times.
This shows, or hopes to, that Jessica sees that her son is no longer a boy but a full grown man. That has all kinds of implications for them both and she is left to wonder what this is going to lead to since their lives are on the line.
Yes people are weird. They think with their genitalia. Some see sexual innuendo in chair legs, others in telephone poles, and even subway holes... Come to think of it, people are nuts... Opps! Sex, again! GRR!
Yeah, some twisted people thinking that the man and woman have sexual tension--when they are son/mother. Then again, that's a thing in some cultures I guess. Weird indeed.
I don't care what anybody says I'm glad they included the sand walk!
And it isn't like it takes up much screen time at all. Just enough to show how it works.
Jamis absolutely showed him the ways of the desert. Win or die.
This "rebirth" moment added by Villeneve is pretty interesting.
This movie really is my favorite in the past like 10 years at least. This is way better than anything Marvel or DC made.
Compliments to the chef, Frank Herbert, of course.
3:04 This moment sold me the entire trilogy.
Went to watch the second part last Tuesday, and it was all the same. Masterpieces of cinema.
My dune blue ray is going to melt thanks to clips like this. Any little snippet has me watching the whole movie. I really hope this franchise goes beyond the first book
At 3:04 or so, Hans Zimmer threw in a small snippet of music in homage to the 1984 Dune soundtrack by Toto. Anyone catch that?
It's a justified homage. The soundtrack to the 84 dune was awesome too.
Yes, I got it... It was a really cool soundtrack. Also the way the sand dunes are shown is pretty similar
I sure did! I'm glad to see others who remember the music from the 1984 film.
Only seconds in the movie where the music is any good
Unsurprisingly, some viewers misinterpreted House Atreides' (House of Hotties) sexiness. They're in life threatening circumstances and have to put on stillsuits with no accustomed privacy.
coomers, man
In the army you get no privacy, the mission is what counts
O thought the House of Hotties title was contested between the Harkonnen and the Tleilaxu!
Stroke without rhythm, and you won't arouse your worm.
@@squamish4244 🤣☠️
One of my favorite scenes from the first movie. You can notice the homage to the toto soundtrack from 1984 at the end.
I love the plug from the original 1984 score Hans Zimmer used at 3:04
@@DerHalbeEuro ua-cam.com/video/MCiRR3X7rjM/v-deo.html 6:27
Rebecca is really an amazing actress. She's so aloof and in control in many scenes and then suddenly convincingly distraught. In this scene she has that defeated look, we didn't see before, even when she was distressed.
They can fold space and see the future but never invented sunglasses.
Shes pregnant with Alia Atriedes which Paul figures out later with his abilities. She was sensing if he can sense using their psychic powers
Sure buddy, whatever you say
he doesn't have psychic powers. hes prescient, the ability is not complete yet as he hasn't taken the water of life. i would suggest read the book so you dont make ignorant statements
He already knows that in that moment.
Edit:
And yes, he doesn't have any psychic powers. He has visions of the future.
Ok so anotehr excuse for it not being sexual tension.
I'm starting to see a trend here. Fans of this movie can't deal with the obvious and are desperately trying to figure out why this scene was so f*cking weird
Yeah there's a little of it here and people keep doing mental gymnastics to avoid mentioning it@doriandundee9906
How do they walk, it’s easy, you put your left leg in, you put your left leg out.
No, that's now how you walk in the desert. If you do that, you create low-frequency vibrations that attract snakes! Both on Arrakis and on Earth. The way to walk in the Sahara dunes is to glide... you NEVER lift a foot, you slide it, you skate on the sand, that gives the inhabitants of the desert the impression it is SAND that moves, not an animal. In that respect, the movie is terribly badly made! Also, you do not rythme your slides, but break it by changing constantly both direction and length; and you do it slowly. It is NOT a race, it's passing unnoticed that matters. An expert will move with the sand moved by the wind. That way, the movement undertaken by the glider is hidden by the movement of the sand itself.
Sorry for the few spelling mistakes. I hope it does not divert readers from the topic. I tried to fix them but...
REQUEST: The ending scene right after jamis defeat
Maybe just maybe she is watching and copying his action as she doesn't know what to do. he then GLANCES back to make sure she is following along. There is no sexual tension just people projecting their own desires onto a totally platonic scene
or people just interpreting an ambiguous work of art differently. There is no right way for it to be perceived.
Okay anotehr excuse for it not being sexual tension .... dude, you guys just need to get your out of you ass and accept reality. This is a super awkward scene and 100% has super weird and gross sexual tension between a mother and a son. Don't ask me why they did this and not his has nothing to do with the viewers mind AND everything to do with how the scene was filmed. YOu guys actually believe that the director was an idiot... holy cow. Have some respect for his work god damnit!
Jessica looks at Paul's back. Internet: INCEST
What a film!!!
"breathe through this . . ." and Denis shows the sands move . . . we must learn to breathe through the skin -- no longer take breaths, like Buddhist and Hindu sage do.
I see you failed biology.
@@definitelynotanAIchatbot it’s not literal
@@Cam____ So what he said about Buddhist and Hindu sages about not having to breathe was supposed to be a metaphor or something?
I didn't get to see this film . . . because of local politics. I've been looking very often at clips and I can't imagine that Hollywood made a better film than this in that year . . . Best Picture (Academy Awards).
I didn’t find any tension at all and never thought about it until u guys mentioned it what r u on?
It’s not anything in-universe (Hopefully not but incest does exist in the dune universe, Mother to Som wouldn’t be very far off from Bene Gesserit training)
I think what People are picking up on is Rebecca Ferguson looking at Timothee In a way that a Mother shouldn’t. Since IRL, She can find him attractive(like many other older women do and tim is no spring chicken either, but he looks boy-ish) and it’s not a crime for her to want to do ‘some’ things to him.
Could anybody tell me what's the name of the OST of this scene please 🥺 the one that has some kind of alien bells sounding
Stillsuits by Hans Zimmer
@@ammanbansal2265 thank you so much!
People really be thinking that his visions of Jamis teaching him the way of the desert came true through him killing the guy.
Lads, the guy fucked up somewhere. Think of it as a multichoice playthrough and my boy Paul just sent himself down the very low honor path by failing to avoid the fight and having to kill Jamis.
Billions dead, cause he fucked up. This ain't the good guy of the story, ya'll better start getting that.
Yeah, Paul attracted the worm and it chased him and Jessica. That wasn't meant to happen.
Paul isn't the good guy, no one in Dune are the "good guys."
However Paul didn't cause the Jihad or the death of billions by any specific path or choice he took. In fact he continually moves to make the choices which cause the least suffering. His issue is that every path he sees causes suffering, Jihad and war across the Empire.
Paul sees only one path with a positive outcome, but that path also sees Paul become a ruthless tyrant destroying the empire and human society across all of the known universe, so Paul being a good person (he is a good person, even if he isn't "the good guy") cannot face that path, at least not until he is sure there are absolutely no one paths available.
@@NATIK001 An actual "good person" wouldn't delude themselves into believing a vision nobody but themselves can even see and let humanity go down the path of life on it's own.
Paul's decisions led to tens of billions butchered, countless planets destroyed and humanity as a whole thrown back into tribal state.
If your beloved dog compagnion gets old and sick, you don't show compassion and empathy by wiring it up to a bunch of tubes and forcing it to live on indefinetly in misery for the sole sake to be able to say "I saved it's life, huaha!" but by letting it go to sleep in peace, valueing the time you had together while maintaining it's dignity.
Paul is neither a good guy nor a good person. He deluded himself into believing his own lies and that he is trapped by a future nobody but himself was able to form.
Saving the human race for the price of it's majority being purged in fire is not a good deed. It's an excuse for violence and spread of suffering.
@@NtoTheM Is that dog metaphor *meant* to imply that Paul and by extension Leto should've let humanity go extinct? I can see where you're coming from if you don't accept the narrative assumption that humanity would have actually suffered in the long run without their actions, but you kind of fail to be convincing when you suggest the better of two options is complete and likely *violent* annihilation. Why are you assuming that humanity's extinction would come peacefully, like the death of a single, sick being, rather than as a result of continuing scarcity and social collapse? Are you really suggesting that all humans dying violently is better than a significant number of humans dying violently, or do you think an extinction-level societal collapse isn't going to be just as violent as the latter?
@@coolguyjki Let me put it real simple for you, that seems to be necessary, unfortunately.
Option A: You MAYBE save the collective mankind in the long run by going down the Golden Path. However, this requires you to put humanity through thousands of years filled to the brim with genocide, religious oppression and a complete lack of freedom.
The result: You butchered the majority of mankind, murdered countless billions who would'nt have died horribly without your doing, crippling what's left of the race for millenia to come without even having any guarantee that your plan will work out in the long run.
Option B: You realise how self-righteous your delusions about the future and some made up prophecies are and let humanity move on, so it may or may not eventually dies out but on the way will suffer 99.9999% less than if you go with Option A.
The guy has no guarantee that he even saves mankind by doing what he does. He does it as an insurance policy. He sentences whole civilisations and entire populations to a gruesome death in HIS name as a GOD-KING so the future people MAY be safe from some future calamity after spreading out.
To answer the question you try your hardest to paint more complex as it really is:
Yes, it is a lot more generous to allow a species to die out the way it is than to convince yourself that putting it through a millenia-long genocide somehow equals saving it.
It's like people aren't currently already discussing the invasion of one's own life by others with the ban of abortions. Very same concept. One douchebag thinks himself better than everyone else so he goes and makes decisions for a whole universe knowing he could without ever stopping to think for a second whether he should.
3:54 Just read this scene in novel 😅
Just put the while movie up bruh
I tried, but UA-cam blocked me :)
@@samsypoo true hero
@@samsypoo 🙌
Олесска гр
😇🔱😈
Main hero - juden?
dune is Young adult book?
Yes, especially the book where a guy become a giant worm and rule as a dictator
No.
Your sweat has salt in it so how can u drink it!!?🤪👁️
"It's basically a micro-sandwich - a high-efficiency filter and heat-exchange system. The skin-contact layer's porous. Perspiration passes through it, having cooled the body ... near-normal evaporation process. The next two layers . . . include heat exchange filaments and salt precipitators. Salt's reclaimed. Motions of the body, especially breathing and some osmotic action provide the pumping force. Reclaimed water circulates to catchpockets from which you draw it through this tube in the clip at your neck... Urine and feces are processed in the thigh pads. In the open desert, you wear this filter across your face, this tube in the nostrils with these plugs to ensure a tight fit. Breathe in through the mouth filter, out through the nose tube. With a Fremen suit in good working order, you won't lose more than a thimbleful of moisture a day..."
The books are better
No sh*t, something that is written with hundreds & thousands of pages tell more & better story than a cinematic medium which has a couple of hours.
I would like to see the writer try to tell the same quality story in less than 50 pages in total, as detailed, as good, go on, can they?
That's what I thought.
Lady Jessica is the daughter of vladimir baron harkonnen
Not cool putting spoilers in the comment section bro delete
The poor people who havent read the book
@@awabqureshi814 the poor people that'll never read the book.. 😂
WHAT
How? Does she know? Does the baron know?
Why is there mad sexual tension between the mother and her son. I kept waiting for her to make a move on him
I believe it is her reliance on Paul and him becoming more of a leader. She used to care for him, and he is now her principal protector. At least that is how the books describe it. But yeah, kinda off-putting delivery here
Lmao people will skirt around this but there really was a vibe of sexual tension between them. It was really odd.
Oh yea, Rebecca could have acted more motherly, but hey, I'm not complaining.
It seems Game of Thrones has made incest mainstream 😂😂😂
@MarvelousMaggie ... dirty minds, dirty thoughts... paraphrasing from Stargate: an honest man stands by the river and hears water but a liar hears lies.
Paul will have to become a fair but ruthless galactic emperor. Emperor Shadam IV made the mistake of being all ruthless with no fairness. Shadam's father, Emperor Elrood, was not an permanent asshole like his son.
‘fair but ruthless’ is putting it mildly 💀
And then along came Leto II.
61 billion kek
Yeah he'll definitely becoming a FAIR Emperor. 😉
I'm watching you 👀
I was a friend of Jamis…
People think it's sexual tension, but do realise this movie is full of visions and dream sequences. It's very likely that while she was looking at him, she saw something.
She's also realizing her son isn't a boy anymore. He's taking charge and knows what he's doing.
Nothing sexual about it. Just a boy becoming a man and taking charge
@@VideoMask93 She realizes she can't protect him from what he is destined to become and is literally seeing prophecy unfold before her eyes as well.....difficult for a mother, regardless of her programming, to see her son walking a path she probably wasn't sure she wanted him to travel down....
In that moment his back reminds her of Leto. It's in the book
I interpreted it as her being a bit taken aback by how natural it looked for him putting the suit on. He really is in his element here, which foreshadows him deciding his path lies in the desert rather than off world.
Sandworm popping out:
"I say! Nice step, could you possibly teach me?"
why was Lady Jessica losing strength? was it because of the dryness or some spice effect or ?
she is pregnant
She’s pregnant
She's got a bun in oven
Is this scene 1 + 1 = 1 reference from his previous film Incendies?
In what way?
Funny enough, She did made the exact same moves and they ended up creating a rythm anyway :p
1:54 so Blackhawk Riggers Belts are apparently a thing in the Dune universe lmao
It’s Duncan in 1:35 min?
Санжима
Why are they looking at each other like that
Plenty of people already explained in the comments
stop acting like a coomer
Bro I wondered the same thing. These are the best bits of movies as they are always subject to heavy debate.
Why did they kill Jamis?He was a Paul friend in the book
They kill jamis in book as well...
The only difference between the book and movie in this case is that they shortened the period between when Stilgar's group encountered Paul and Jessica and Jamis initiating the fight. In the book, they'd traveled with the Fremen for a few hours and Jamis made the challenge when they rested for the day.
0:35 "You can breathe through this"
... uhm, you're already breathing without it 🤔
the suits are designed to minimalize the loss of water. breathing through that stops the loss of water from their breath. it isn't oxygen.