Decoding the Weather Machine FULL SPECIAL | NOVA | PBS America
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 лют 2024
- Join scientists on a quest to better understand the weather and climate machine we call Earth. Why do scientists overwhelmingly agree that our climate is changing, and how can we be resilient - even thrive -in the face of enormous change?
About PBS America:
Welcome to PBS America, a British TV channel from America’s public service broadcaster, PBS, showcasing award-winning American history, science, current affairs, plus arts and culture shows alongside the works of living legend Ken Burns, output is all hand-picked by a British team.
Get More PBS America:
Website: www.pbsamerica.co.uk/
Twitter: / pbsamerica
Facebook: / pbsamerica
Instagram: / pbsintheuk - Наука та технологія
This is the way science should be used for! For the betterment of humanity and protection of nature.
I agree.
We need to increase the amount of land covered by forests and jungles drastically. They're our best defense against rising temperatures. We're too distracted by technology when nature has so much to offer us at a fraction of the cost and it maintains itself. Better that than the alternative.
Pity that the exact opposite is happening worldwide.
@@Barbarra63297 agreed. We need those forests back, they're so crucial for our continued survival.
The deforestation makes since a 100 years, in average each 10 years an area half the size of India. That’s the cause of rising CO₂ levels, 280ppm to 420ppm since 1960. However, 540 million years ago, during the Cambrian, CO₂ levels were over 8000ppm, 20 times more as currently. No hot house earth, no boiling planet. That are measures, not models, having zero prediction value but can be tweaked suiting perfectly the political narrative.
Besides, below 200ppm, the flora starts to die, below 180ppm means end of all life as we know it on the surface on the planet. The survivors the micro biospheres surrounding the black smokers, 4 km deep submerged in the midst of the Atlantic Ocean.
It basically means a drastic reduction in much of general modern consumption, private motoring and global travelling, to name a few. Current commercialism together with human population growth and expansion is simply not viable, as the global average annual sustainable resource use now reaches the limit even before August. However, a minority of humans spend their share long before that, but still this profit based industry is supposed to grow. It's quite a mystery only how to make all the deniers/big consumers realise actuality.
Not sure that I agree with it all, as for the wind turbines, only to give one example, which we know they are not zero carbon emission since their production is very costly: ecologically low-effective... I believe you will understand why. However, for most of the rest of the program, I have to say that I was amazed by the quality of the researches and the narration, which I found really compelling!
yeah there ids a reason they only talk about the last 800k years lol cause if they git back longer it thows all their numbers out
Do not worry you will sink with all of us.
The one thing you dont hear is that it is greenery that absorbs the carbon, and as a race we have chopped down more trees than at any other time in history because its easy to do.
Nobody has said tbat for every tree you chop down you replace it with two of the same kind because trees asorb different amounts, so can take more than others.
The other thing is the use of plastic which even today is still on the rise despite knowing that its not only
Harmfull to all other life but also to us, and plus we are not very good at cleaning up after ourselves.
Ever wondered why mountainous areas are cooler than industrial lowlands despite the fact it's more closer to the sun.
Great show. I'm Canadian and we bought a pipeline that won't pay for itself for another 50 years...As one of the presenters in the documentary said, we can continue to do nothing but we are digging ourselves a much deeper hole to climb out of, and that has proved to be the truth. We will continue to do nothing substantial and we will leave a world much, much more different than the one we currently inhabit to our children and this is also a fact. The world will go on, the question really is will we?
Of all the lies we must deal with, Deliberate Omissions, are the most dangerous.
Google search 2023 homeless in Canada. No new data for a decade?!!!
. *How is that even possible?*
"In Statistics Canada's 2023 review of Canadian homelessness data, the latest estimate they provide is from 2014. That estimate says 235,000 people experience “the many different types of homelessness” every year, according to the Canadian Observatory on Homelessness, a research organization."
I like Pierre, but... What do you think stops Poilievre from challenging Finance Minister Freeland in Parliament for holding a chair at the World Ecinomic Forum board of directors table in Geneva since 2019? The fact that that fact has never been reported in the Canadian Press for 5 years, should disturb all of us.
Is PM Harper just as dedicated to the World Ecinomic Forum Great Reset Agenda success as PM Trudeau and Finance Minister Freeland? The fact that he was at Davos in 2024 with Chrystia Freeland is compelling evidence that he is. Because of PM Harper, and deliberate Press failures to report the facts to the public, Canada is economically weaker than we think.
Did you know that PM Harper sold off 100% of Canada's Gold Reserves at bottom of the market values? Did you know that Canada is the only G-20 country in the World to hold ZERO Gold reserves today? 100% true. The fact that that fact is never mentioned in Parliament, and (almost) never reported in the Canadian Press, should disturb all of us.
The farmer and his simple yet so effective way he harvests his field....I like this alot. Must save in so much waste too. Green light here 👌
NOOOOOOOO
Brilliant stuff! I love science and nature, but I always had the sense that people who love the planet seem to hate other people. There are extreemists in all fields, but thoughtfull content like this will bring good resource management to the mainstream.
You want to try living in nature it couldnt give a fuck. You can love nature but it won't love you back there has to be a ballance between the two
I don't hate other people, I don't hate humanity, I have immense compassion for everybody around me. But humanity is crushingly, appallingly stupid, we're ruining our ability to live, we're doing it to ourselves knowingly, and I cannot abide such senseless foolishness.
I love humanity, but I hate our foolish, greedy, shortsighted stupidity.
We're about to get what's coming to us.
I only hate people that denies facts, don't want to change to protect the ecosystems and don't respect animal welfare and nature.
Hate other people? Are you a 3 yr old child with no reasoning ability?
Get some PBS in your life.
If you are a brainwashed fool
PBS Peasants Brainwashing Bullshit
Prove Oil is a fossil fuel
"most people sense change in weather"
Meanwhile, our winter which usually starts at December is now starting from January 20th while the December was warm
I've noticed seasons being later and later. Used to always have snow before Halloween and for sure deep snow by Halloween, now it's December/January before any snow adds up
❤
@@MatthewBandstra-kt7yj If you changed location. Say to another state or to another elevation the weather can be very different to what you had at the previouse location. 500 miles can be a vast difference. It is very usual for there to be be variations from year to year with never an exact replication. This year here in England we seemed to have a mild December but a colder November. I tend to find than many many people are shocked at how their supposed summer never happened. As if it was over with in a blink of an eye. That suprises me or used to suprise me. But as a person who monitors tempretures and really feel the heat. I am usually aware that summer had been happening for the usualy length of time. They seem to be looking for the precise same peaks and if they do not happen they seem to miss the fact that for the usuall three months we have had long sunny days. I usually say that a person has to go out and experience it when it is happening. Otherwise it is easy to miss it whilst sat in an air conditioned room. You could easily miss a whole summer living in a new City with High Rise buildings casting penumbric hadows.
Had they filmed during the winter it would've been pitch dark - and dead cold...
Look, the weather is controlled, manipulated and modified, it all started way back in 1946, the Americans actually said by 2021 we will control the weather.
Co2 is too low at present, it is around 400ppm, it needs to be at 1000ppm to make plants flourish.
Look - you're not a scientist.
Better tell all the 50 countries to stop geo engineering and stop blaming it on the masses
None are.
@Element-oe8hn do your research buddy
That is really a very interesting subject. I moved from Sweden to Thailand almost two years ago and the clouds here never look like the clouds do in Sweden. So I weren't sure if Sweden was doing it until I moved here and couldn't see any straight line clouds anymore.
@SethEques Looks like they didn't like my reply comment as its been removed! :)
@@scottbaileyActivstudios Nah, it seems to be a sensitive subject all over the world. No one is openly admitting anything about it.
Bravo NOVA!
Sensers are like a box of chocolates, you never know what your going to get.
PBS be dropping dimes in back to back week!!! Whose cooking this content? 😂
Given the state the planet's in, it's amazing we still get shows like this, that is still pretty much asking is "is there climate change or not."!
They’re not asking. It’s just being presented that way for the purposes of telling a story so more people will (hopefully) get it. The stance is clear from the start.
Now that we have a theory about changing the climate through trapped carbon release, we fly all over the world to attend conferences on climate change, we ship goods all over the world by sea and air, we have been burning gases, byproduct of petroleum extraction, to keep the lights on at night generating light pollution, we maintain a naval fleet constantly on the go consuming oil, we start wars to sell weapons and detonante bombs as a business, meanwhile we cry wolf regarding climate change...
Neurosis any one...
Maybe Let's Face It..? "We're Fucked & Doomed 2 Extinction"
1) it's not a "theory"
2) did you want the scientists to keep it secret? Why? 😅
yea co² making the planet greener
Yes we can study it , the climate but we cannot change it or " do something about it" all we can do is try to guard and protect our selves against it . Roll with the blows . We as humans have never been better situated to adjust to the changes in the climate.
We have changed ourselves, already.
Amazing, almost perfect.
We will immediately link to our product's homepage.
This is a product page aimed at reducing the amount of air conditioners used, which was recently posted on the Japanese Ministry of the Environment, so please allow this as the purpose is the same.
However, the perception is that the situation is about 20 years worse than the simulation from 40 years ago, so I think there is still some oversight.
One is the phenomenon that a Japanese university proved last year that as the ocean temperature rises, it emits CO2.
Another thing that comes to mind is that when CFCs were abolished, they were replaced with CFCs that added carbon, making the gas dozens of times more effective at warming the planet, and cooling efficiency also declined, resulting in more CO2 being emitted than before. Isn't it related?
I agree with the complete abolition of CFCs used in spray cans, but I think it was a mistake to remove the CFCs from car air conditioners and replace them with alternative CFCs, and there is a possibility that a lot of CFCs were released.
And there's something I've been concerned about lately.
Is it really eco-friendly to charge EVs, which emit a lot of CO2 during manufacturing, at night when there is no solar power and then drive them during the day?
If the number increases further, I think the correct answer up until now will become incorrect.
This may still be true in the United States, where nuclear power generation is in operation, but depending on the state, CO2 emissions may be increasing due to charging at night.
Now we need to think carefully.
😊😅😅😂
🎉🎉😊😊😅😊😊😂😅😅😂😅😂😅😊😂🎉
Your reference to CFC's is just a distracting irrelevance.
What an entertaining and thorough review!! You had me nailed to the screen, Thanks a bunch for sharing!
Rome's Portus grain port 200 AD at sea level, now up to 40 metres above sea level, is obviously not silted over, as NASA proclaims, attached, because it's visible on Google maps and satellite. Google maps indicate a current elevation about 40 metres above current sea levels.
UA-cam Drain the Oceans Rome pictures the evidence. It's the tip of the iceberg. There's a huge community of marine archeology studying sea levels fluctuations. Mostly below sea levels but some above. Apparently one researcher sought permission to scan the flood plains below Troy.
Apparently there are hundreds of ports from the Roman era which are now above sea levels. Isle of Thanet, Shore Forts, Port of Rye UK. It appears the conventional explanation is "SILTED OVER" but new evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, is sea levels were higher in Roman times. Rebuilding global ports needs 100 years lead time ( check with Arcadis, Netherlands) and because we're talking about the End of Civilization, this issue is STAT.
Scientists who debated a physical environment without inspecting it are like Ancient Greek scientists who debated how many teeth a horse has without inspecting horses.
It's urgent that marine archeology, inSAR, NISAR, Adrok Scotland ( AI and big data radar points) and ground penetrating radar ( a new technology), geomatics ( a new science of ground instability or movement), mining tech, volcanology, ash layers, and so on re-examine the physical evidence because civilizations built on ports end when their ports are high and dry or submerged. Don't know whether sea levels will return to their (recent) peak in 10, 100 or 1,000 years, nor what the cyclical processes are.
The way I understand it , is that the increase in vegetative sequestration as CO2 concentration rises is likely to be much lower than the number mentioned. There is more to it than just tree mass. There is soil carbon retention and the changes in water and nuitrient availability as completion for these components increases with the demand to increase tree mass. And macro environmental effects like draught and temperature and salination and the change from forest to Savanah are also negative feed back effects to the absolute volume of fossill fuel emissions that the vegetation can absorb. There is still more bad news to come on this as research and models catch up. Trees are part of the preindustrial carbon cycle equilibrium. Planting trees, or even expecting existing trees to sequestrate more can never be the reason to keep burning fossil fuels. Emissions trading schemes have done enormous damage by pretending there is carbon equivalence of tree and fossil fuels.
Dr. Milankovic And Stevacevic said everything a long time ago why this happening with Klima
Great docoo about it and have a great day today from Kenneth D in Hamilton New Zealand ❤😂❤😂❤
We need to act NOW!!!!
I am Joseph Bigsky l from frog lake Alberta in Canada 😊😅
Is the fog okay.
HARRP?
These feelgood optimistic endings to these programs has helped get us into this mess. Tech is not going to sprinkle pixy dust and stop this locomotive that has so much inertia. We need to be afraid of how far we have let this go, very afraid, and scared into evasive action globally.
Yr.no Greenland 14/4/2024: -30° C
Antarctica: -54° C
Any roofs of new construction should be finished white ,trees must be planted ,gardens must be grown instead of grass to feed the poor because poor people can pollute more. Tidal power is the greenest because it works all the time and not many use it. Heat is the big issue and we must use lighter colours for our surfaces to reflect the heat. Using energy from dead plant life is renewable untilized by gasification. Alge blooms need to be harvested and utilized for biodiesel production. The land fills can be turned into energy through gasification plants to run carbon capture plants. Lots we can do if we have less governmental corruption stealing tax payers money.
It will be interesting to see this science intersect with AI advancements
As long as the banks and the insurance companies give out long term loan's and insurances to beach properties I don't believe in this. When they stop I'll buy one 😂
You’re misinformed.
@@kellywinston5811 So the prices of beach properties are plummeting because people can't get loans or insurance on them anymore? Guess I'm in the buyers market then 😂
Hi, I kind of agree with you, but in many cases like bushfrires and floods they don't cover anymore, or exorbant annual premiums.
Actually, did you see that 25M beachfront mansion ready to collapse?
If you haven't, let me know and i will try to find it.
Cheers!
👍
they normally broke before they realise things like that happening :D they not have Crystal balls or anything more than ordinary people, more than estatistical risk data and math based on the past. they may be even more missinformed than you or me. you are giving bank and insurance companys more powers than they have. they only profit and bet with the past risk data in their favor. and even this way, they already are asking for more money for flooding in advance of past data, expecially in coast areas., when it start to flood evidently more they will wont give insurance for flood on beach areas anymore.
Is there a reason the acidification of the ocean was not mentioned? Was that corn field that does not till the soil a GMO crop? There must be a change in carbon absorption for farmers using chemicals in their operations? I did not see any reference to this aspect either, but both highly problematic.
yeah nah we're not allowed to talk about the ill effects of GMO, geoengineering or known forever chemicals literally everywhere even our own bodies.
So you have NO clue that WATER is Ph 8,1.. Ignorance buys every lie
“…whether something similar in the atmosphere was doing the same thing…” is redundant. Corrected: ‘…something in the atmosphere was doing the same thing…’
Norfolk has a history of flooding, there have been less typhoons and extreme weather patterns in recent years, and the polar icecaps are following their normal cycle of variation, like they have been since polar bears were invented.
Is the United Nations a criminal organisation? Just wondering.
Not a fluke at all...concreting fields, building houses on floodplains and big expensive houses in fire prone mountains like california is why the weather is causing more trouble than before, overpopulation, 2 hundred years ago ,these same events would have caused little or no damage to people as there was no one there, there i said it
But the c02 is hevvy that ossigen,how got tote air?
Radio&TV 😮OMG whole
Climate is very very complex and involves several scientific disciplines, so how can there be any real Climate Scientist? Only self proclaimed ones ?
Because it based on understood scientific principles using fairly accurate data to make predictions and, to explain extreme weather events or climate trends..
Its not you its not CO2 its the sun David Dubyne adapt 2030 channel
Why not try redirecting the warm water flow away from the extreme North and likewise the southpole too , We do direct huge volumes of water to our desires now. Plus they put white sheets on glaceurs ,why not start anyway?
What's the chances of the climate changing in way totally unexpected way...mini ice age, dont rule it out.
We had a mini ice-age for 500 years. It ended 1850, roughly.
Build loads of cheap boat drones with a fan and pump to circle the Arctic and use the sea water to pump the water to the fans and make snow and as they are so cheap to make send thousands every month
It’s not so much distrust of government but science denial. Many people are not adherents to evidence based thinking. They believe in concepts implicitly without citing any evidence to support their perspective often in the face of very substantial evidence that points the other way. Evidence-based thinking needs to be better represented in the school system (the resistance to teaching young people about natural selection and evolutionary biology is a good example - there is no need in science to provide counter theories unless based on demonstrable evidence). Climate science should be looked upon with an open mind. Of course scepticism is part of the process of finding credible solutions to important questions but it needs to be rational
Just out of curiosity 9:30
It is mentioned that addressing the issue will be "enormously expensive".
So how expensive is human survival?
Because i can go ask the Bank for a loan or borrow them!
I wouldn't want to be the only human that can afford their survival... :P
😅😅
NOVA CIA 1986 ME LINKED
Its natural boys and ginks😊
The earth is shifting from tectonic plates earthquakes removal of plant life. Heat from cars factories houses highrises changing wind directions etc.
Right-wingers must hate this show due to its reliance on things like facts and science.
That’s a pretty bigoted statement
lol and here we are adding co2 to all our green houses lol you hate us famers. we have burners running just to keep the co2 way up .
fun fact you drop the co2 by just 20 ppm and you see with your eye and drop off in yeild in most fruiting plants
You really think there are no left-wing conspiracy theorists? Politics and science are substantially acorrelational.
@@Element-oe8hn yep that is whyn the left always cenor and delete comments cause akll the have is lies
i love the co2 we spent a lot of money on system to make co2 to add to our green house, we famers love the co2
The data shows that there may be an additional cause for global warming which may also have much less time lag and so faster remediation.
This is an ALSO not an instead of GHG controls. If it turns out we can control the temperature of the planet by adjusting the dark matter flow only then do you reevaluate the big picture! The data says the lag time from the sun to the temperature at the poles is about 60 days!! If we prove we can control the temperature of the planet by either redirecting or vaporizing Liquid dark matter then we can think about harnessing that heat or redirecting it to Mars to kick start its magnetic field field or if nothing else warm it up. Alternatively if the earth cools to much we could siphon some from Venus to warm the planet. Assuming the vaporization is done around L1 we could see the change in a week. Redirecting from Venus would take longer.
All of the planets in the solar system are showing signs of heating up.
Dark matter phase transitions could be a primary climate driver. If the solar system passes through an area of higher liquid dark matter content the planets cores would all receive more heat due to increased phase transitions thus heating the earth from the inside out. The dark matter content may even be virtually the same but the fact that we are facing into the hurricane may increase it’s effects.
Heating of the planet from the inside out would result in :
Increased ground temperatures
Increased sea temperatures
Increased nighttime temperatures
Increased seismic activity
Increased earthquakes
We are currently passing through the S1 dark Matter stream. At the winter solstice the earth goes from moving with the S1 stream to moving into it.
Dec 12 2016 Venus Mercury alignment tsunami rotation slowed
Dec1 2018 Venus Mercury alignment tsunami rotation slowed
June 3 18:00 2020 +0 29 North Venus Earth conjunction VENUS TSUNAMI facing the Earth day 1
July 2020 Siberian heatwave and Antarctica temperature spike
Feb 11 2021 ice storm in Texas - this may be due to an offset of the dark matter sphere as it shifts after the winter solstice resulting in the movement of the zero G spot to an area of gaseous dark matter which means less internal heat until the dark matter sphere regains equilibrium.
Jan 9 01:00 2022 +4 51 North Venus Earth conjunction VENUS TSUNAMI facing the Earth and the planets were slightly closer than the last conjunction 585 days
March 18 2022 Concordia Station spiked 39 C degrees due to unusual air patterns near Australia
North Pole regions hit 30C above normal
Jan 30 2022 ice storm in Texas
Aug 13 11:00 2023 -7 41 south Venus Earth conjunction VENUS TSUNAMI was past the outward deflection and on its way back 1166 days also Venus was south of the orbital plane
Oct 28 predict a major heat release in the Arctic and Antarctic due to combined tidal affects on the dark matter sphere around the sun in combination with the movement of the barycentre of the Earths location. VENUS TSUNAMI was facing the side and the distance between the planets was further
DATES TO WATCH for tsunami rotation ?? Pre and post rotation rates are needed
Jan 16-25. 2024 Mercury Venus alignment
Mar 07-20 2024 Mercury Jupiter alignment Venus Mars alignment
Apr 11-18 2024 Mercury Earth alignment Jupiter Uranus alignment
May 20-28 Venus Jupiter Uranus alignment Mercury Mars Saturn ? Neptune ?
June 15-23 Mercury Venus alignment
Venus atmospheric temperatures from 2009-2017 also were higher after conjunctions
Venus atmospheric rotation takes 4 days - atmospheric tsunami takes on average 5 (4.9?) days to circle Venus since 1986 this could be caused by an offset dark mater sphere as a result of wobble induced by overflow of LDM every 5 days when the sphere is closest to the sun. This departing kick is what keeps the offset between Venus and its dark matter sphere which then accumulates LDM for 5 more days. The interval from the data I found varies from 4-6 days the 6 day stretch was after the 2022 conjunction which may have depleted its dark matter reserves resulting in a slower tsunami rotation. The clouds at that level take 5.7 days to circle the planet (tsunami speed = 328 kph)
The earths core also has an 8.47 day astronomically induced wobble.(LDM sphere)
NASA issued a climate change warning for Mars after Mariner 9 (icecaps melting)
Neptune has been heating up since 2018
Hottest xyz on record. Maybe we should check in on the data points of these records. Copernicus I believe is the organisation providing this data. When do these records start? Oh they changed that. Yeah didn't hear much about it. Starting all the way back in 1979. No not a typo, not 1879, but 1979. Hmm
I've seen several climate change graphs where data conveniently leaves out earlier that that would make the graph less dramatic. Let's face it, it is big business now.
@@pastexpiry2013B ain't it just. Same games just played on repeat
Hello question could we not pipeline glaciar water to drought condit6ions south of northern Alberta slow down rising sea levels before it hits the oceans just asking would proubley help forest fire as well
Earth will be like a tatoin in starwars in 2500..imagine a planet without a seas..human life become only millions in numbers..water evaporate fast because of heat..the future is scary...
What will negatively impact the UK most in the next 20yrs, climate change or uncontrolled immigration?
12,000 year cycles
we have bunners running to up our co2 as 400 ppm is just a little low to grow in green house
How ironic that the internet is an Energy Monster that is 'anti-climate'
Climate Change is real and I understand ports like Port of Vancouver are being hammered by Climate Change, including atmospheric rivers. America's farmers and producers may want to redirect exports through Duluth, the Great Lakes and the Seaway. If independent investigation confirms Rome's grain port, portus, is now and always was, about 40 meters higher than current sea levels, then America's farmers and producers may want to export through Duluth, the Great Lakes and the Seaway which are much higher than current and future sea levels. You'll need independent experts in order to attract investors and infrastructure.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Funny as bruv,and I suppose fairy's are real as well 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
Hate to be simplistic but could we just not cover non farmable land with trees its sustainable renewable and a source of building material. If you do a quick calculation if the rain forests hadn't been touched we wouldn't be in the mess were in now. And trees are cheep compared to the other ideas been knocked around.
Very well done and informative
In the atmosphere, water vapour varies from 0-4% while carbon dioxide varies from 0.038-0.043% at any given moment in time ... has anyone been doing the OBVIOUS science of tracking the H2O molecule? ... instead we pull our hair out regarding the CO2 molecule. H2O is periodically100 times more plentiful and it's power to alter the temperature is 1000s of times more powerful. Now, how, as a dumbfk (like me) say that? 'cause I live in the real world, OUTSIDE ... how much does the (radiant) heat go up on your skin when the sun comes out from behind a (H2O) cloud? ... milliseconds. Just how much CO2 would be required to do that? well SCIENCE says that it's not a straight line effect, it's an exponential curve ... not the way you're think though, we are approaching the flat section where you add a whole shtload of CO2 and nothing detectable happens to the temperature.
Do the science ... with the number of satellites in the sky now we should be able to classify H2O percentages globally at any moment in time, why is nobody doing the science on H2O and temperature?
Ever notice what happens when you by a (let's say) a Volkswagen ... suddenly, wherever you look you see Volkswagens. Perhaps obsessing on CO2 just allows you to invent more places to see CO2 and IGNORE the obvious ... what do you think? not even possible? SHAME on you.
Sure wish this documentary was not so over-the-top biased against science in it's true form while purporting/insinuating to be the exact opposite. Do you know why working horses on the farm had bridals with blinders on the sides? ... they were there so the horses concentrated on the work at hand ... straight ahead. That is what this video is all about, to encourage you to keep YOU "looking straight ahead" and miss EVERYTHING else around you.
If we (humans) were less arrogant ... thinking that we HAVE to be a force of nature, perhaps we would admit that we STILL don't know ANYTHING.
My advice: TAKE OFF YOUR BLINDERS or you will be so far down the rabbit hole that you'll be useless to the species.
what i find funny is no one talks about food, in our green house any of them that we do not up the co2 in we have a 100% air exchange rate as if the co2 drops even 20 ppm we start to see a drop offs in things yeild.
For h2o contribution. ..just open an ipcc report. ..
I agree with everything you say. Everything in this video has been debunked for decades but the truth doesn’t make the elites the money and give them control over us as Climate Crisis propaganda does!
Exactly. This is like watching a Hollywood movie just drama with no science. The more CO2 they stop the less food we will have. Everything in this video is not science, it is carefully prepared propaganda to push the global agenda because without it their narrative would fall flat in its face.
Can't put a carbon tax on water vapour
The Bible may describe Climate Change and I'll paraphrase it so you get the idea: Noah. Build me a port. It should be designed for fluctuating sea levels. Go and measure how high it fluctuates in recent millenia. For I'm about to flood the ports of the world. Mankind has displeased me. But you have pleased me and listened to my words. ( Rod's living translation of Bible in present circumstances)
Choose one... will humans die de-hydrati g, or.... drowning....
Galileo 😂No lady GaGa😂😂
wow,,its the seasons....
Did you stop seeing when you got there, that it is the seasons that decide?
Thank you so much for an out of context quote. Quite meaningless.
You mention the importance of trees but yet we are cutting down old growth trees like they are worth nothing to the us .
❤?? Il gas inpulsa energia elettrica che se convierte in piccola particella che diventa carbone ciò passaggio del magma gas carbone bombe 🌑🥶
@123.00 climate model inputs are sorely incomplete to be anywhere near accurate. They nowhere near predicted the temperatures of 2023, the hottest year on record.
What if all the money that is now put on wars and unemployment were put on actions to increase forests and and other means to adverse the direction of destiny?????? Ex: pick up te Sundays and convert it electricity and convert that to hydrogen and run cars and industry with hydrogen, this way we keep atmosphere clean and do not use so much fossil fuels. etc. etc. etc.
And put our scientists to think of even more methods to advance new methods.
Best climate documentary i've watched so far.
(It's a bit lengthy, just break it up into like, 4 half hour episodes maybe?) 👍
Lmik😊imi0pp
the life expectancy of the future generation si rapidly decrease
Climate change is both natural and man made, you have to accept both, by not accepting both you have the other side not listen. Currently man made climate change is out pacing natural change, but both are at play.
Come to europe, we have no "global" warming. So where is it?
The Bible, Book of Revelation describes extreme supply chain disruption, and, although it seems to describe Pompei, or Caesaria etc., supply chain disruption of critical ports, is similar. See for example the generic city of Babylon, chapter 18. Historians might address whether the loss of such ports ended civilizations and Rome's grain port, 200 AD, is accessible and amenable to research and proof that would stand up in court.
Why bring superstitions into this?
It is too late in 2024, good luck with thinking a way out of this with your university degrees and technology.
I cant stop thinking someone is going to have egg on their face when the upcoming cooling happens.
The greed of the elite will be the downfall of humanity
Eazy but not my Problem 😂😂
Incredible documentary......Keep motivating us
Cleaver enough to find solutions but not smart enough to implement them.
Willdoffe bipolar, NoVa😂NaVa Betty commany 😂
Rodoffe MC.KENNEDY Crazy 🤪
Real window into the past is not for you to see
"We can't pick up a city and move it..." Does it really take a scientist to know this? Aparentently, it takes a scientist to say it!!
You forgot eunice newton foot who, in 1856, demonstrated that CO2 traps heat
Willdoffe bipolar and Rodoffe crazy 🤪 😂
Willdoffe bipolar 😂😂never win from me😂😂 Doffe
I reckon this planet is too salty...
Wonder how Earth will react when humans start mining for fresh water from outta space?.....
(Think about it) 👍
You can But the weather in China for an event.
there are only three countries that us Imperial measurements (feet inches fahrenheit) they are USA and two banana republics why don't you realise this when you make a video for a global audience
There's one country cant spell use. What drives me mad is the countries that use half and half, example the United Kingdom. Wind and road speed MPH imperial, weights, volumes and (lengths as in lengths you buy) metric and of course plumbing just has to be imperial. So you ask for two meters of three and quarter inch copper pipe. Mind you here in Ireland plumbing isn't any batter.
The simplest way to explain climate change is diferrent parts of the planet, for complex reasons, have heated up, while others (for equally complex reasons) have cooled down. This results in the hotter areas storing more thermal enegy that they have been, and the cooler areas less.
Thermal energy has been transfered back and forth to the point that ocean currents, air currents (including the jet stream), rainfall patterns and plant life is in a degree of choas. Our systems are not balanced.
These things, in conjunction with environmental pollution, influence when and where water is drawn up and when and where it falls. Winds, which are basically areas of the atmosphere expanding and contracting hue to patterns of heat distribution by the sun, and their patterns of movement, are drastically changing in size and location. Same idea for water basically.
This affects every living thing on the planet
All this talk about the warming of the planet, the soil, the oceans, the atmosphere. Did I miss the segment that discusses our main source of heat to our planet? The big bright gas giant radiating heat? No that would open a can of fried worms and dry up the funding. Don't know how you all sleep at night.
Main source of heat - obviously - but NOT the source of warming.
Hostage Deal of prisoners work well. The hot and cold Katy Perry
the problem with all this climate change drama is in two parts. First part is that there will always be some experts saying the opposite of what facts show us. And as people prefer to believe what is more comfortable for them and their lifestyles (please no changes), these so-called experts become influencers. And their theories become the mainstream. The second part is that - although our life is already global (every nation depend on another either for food, technology, energy or all) - we never thınk global, staying within the country's boundaries to try to address a global problem.
Around 3/4 of the documentary, about solar panels and wind turbines, they telling us the wind is not always blowing and the sun not always shinning. Well, there are countries where wind blows year round and nations where the sun is shining almost year round... why not help each others out, for the benefit of all... oh, I guess because some nations think they are more important than others... We'll see how these nations will do when there is no more food around.
Then again, I cant stop thinking someone is going to have egg on their face when the upcoming cooling happens.
It's already happening. The climate crises is the biggest hoax of our time.
🤡
The solution is actually quite simple! We need to block part of the sunlight reaching the earth. Placing clusters of mirrors into space in a stationary orbit and have the ability to move them with small thrusters. Artemis - the rocket - would be a big help in this. This is not my idea, nor is it a new one. We just need to get started, and soon.
The future of mankind and ALL LIFE depends on it!
Or reduce the population in Asia and Africa
weather talk 😄 Can you change weather on Venus and Jupiter ? ...nonsense
They can't predict weather a month from now, but we believe they can predict the weather 10 years from now??
They're working on predicting the climate of the future by using historic data. Predicting the weather for the next few days into the future is a different thing.
@@GloryDaze73 Nice try. 1000s of weather reporting stations, 100s of satellites, and you are trying to tell me it's easier to predict weather/climate over the long term not using any of these modern tools? PS: still waiting for the polar ice caps to melt like they predicted in 2012.... or polar bears to go extinct (eventhough their population is HIGHER than it was in 2012). But hey, 98% of GOVERNMENT FUNDED Scientists agree....
To say we can adapt as an option is laughable.
WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE!!!!!