As an astronomer, this is a really excellent example of Astronomical Seeing. The patterns you’re observing are the light rays from the star being diffracted by the turbulent air currents in the atmosphere. Just like sunlight scattering on the bottom of a swimming pool, so starlight is scattered by the movement of the atmosphere, producing the effect you see here. The transient sharpness is where the light waves constructively overlap each other, producing momentary ridges of brightness. It’s not just stars that do this; you can observe the same twinkly in the lights of cities far away in the distance near the horizon. Really cool to see this atmospheric phenomenon up close. As astronomers it’s annoying because it smudges out the stars making them a little softer, so we prefer to wait for calm nights where the stars are sharper. The concentric circles you can see inside the star are excellent examples of what's called the Airy Disk: the optical diffraction pattern of the lens aperture.
That wouldn't make any sense. Even if the story were true, in scripture the stars are depicted as being below the waters of the firmament, between the earth and the dome.@@matthewarmy6563
This will make sense to the flat earth Firmament model. Sun and Moon are projections reflecting off the Firmament back to a flat stationary earth, giving light to certain areas as this ancient angelic machine that is producing those projections rotates like a night light with the stars being projections as well, from this same machine that is located in the very center of earth and high above the clouds on some type of ancient mountain or tower. The reflection of the Sun/Moon and Stars off the firmament can see the movement of water behind the firmament. This gives the Moon that wave water look, and the Sun has that liquid moving inside look and stars, but it's the water being seen moving through these lights behind the firmament. That's how the angelic beings whether good or evil sneakily move amongst the background of this firmament blend in and keep watch. How the Holy Angels move back and forth through the Firmament, maybe through portals into the higher Heavens ?
I don´t know but I think it might be because I only used a camera with very small sensor, and also used digital zoom and ha the atmosphere between me and the stars ? And then because the unfocused versions are showing up bigger it might become sharper because of the digital zoom in the camera? Just a guess from my side.
God is real and we are being watched! Definitely not here by mistake like the heliosexuals would have you believe. You are important and God loves you like we love our children 🥰
I think you’ve got this backwards. Your unfocused version is actually focused and vice versa. Just looking at this without having any knowledge of the subject, it’s easily distinguishable which is focused and which one isn’t. It’s not even about the focus. It’s that you’re zoomed in much further when you can see multiple circles inside one another.
You're wrong. There is a common misconception of how astronomical telescopes work.... For seeing the detail of planets you do want a reasonably high magnification. However stars are so far away that no telescope on earth or even in space can resolve details of a star. A galaxy yes, stars no. For that reason most telescopes designed to image stars do not even have very high magnification. No point. The Hubble telescope for example has magnification of only about x350. What Hubble does have is a big mirror so it can capture a lot of light. This allows it to "see" stars that are so far away they are too faint to see. The Hubble can capture billions of times more light than the human eye. Because of the above the best images of stars we can expect should be just tiny stationary points of ligh. Even the in focus shots in this video are being made bigger than they should be by limitations in the lenses and atmospheric disturbances.
I do not have this camera. But how u can film @12000mm when the cam only can zoom optical up to 3000mm and with digital zoom (not really zoomed) up to 6000mm ?
The camera actually have 4X digital zoom (2x means 3000x2=6000mm and 4x means 3000x4=12000mm, and sometimes just for fun I crop the "4k" video to 1920x1080 wich means I get another 2x of the 12000mm so then I can say the zoom becomes 24000mm. So If just watch at a small screen it does not look bad at all
Hey my friend; would you mind to give some advices in order to do exactly the same thing? I bought the Nikon p1000 finally; Which mode do you use? Which quality? Fine, normal, RAW RAW+fine? Video: 2160/25p Or 1080/25p How to focus properly the stars, moon and the sun? Please help me! ❤
How do you know that one is in focus and one is not? I have the same camera and an no where near the camera man you are. My tripod is not the greatest. But I can only ever seem to get them when they are not in focus. My friend had a p900 and could get them to come in focus but I have not had quite the same kuck
Hi, When focus into something small as a star in the night sky I would ALWAYS recomend manual focusing. So that means that when I got the star (a bright one in the sky) to be as small as possible in the display I know its the best focus I can get. And if I go all the way to infinity or can say beyond infinity (all the way to the top in the manual focus line to the right in the camera) then the star become blurry again, just like it be if I focus at the other way from when it be its smallest. I have an old manfrotto tripod, not super steady but as long as I don´t touch the camera it can be quite still. so when I am focusing manually the star is moving around the whole display then I have to let it stable itself again, then just cut out the most stable parts. Sorry for this long answer but I hope it explain good enough 🙃🙏👍
I don't know what it means but I filmed a street light that was pretty far away. It's kind of strange, it looked just how mars or Venus would look when "out" of focus. Tbh it looked exactly like an out of focus star. I'm curious if you ever tried that and what your thoughts on that was
@@jamesfisher4059 Not sure but I think almost every light source would look about the same when out of focus, it more about the colors. But remember thatI am no scientist 😀👍
@@letszoomit365 thanks. You have helped a lot. I've looked online but have not had much luck finding a i.r. filter for my p1000. Do you know where I could find one. I mean I found all kinds for other cameras but every time I do a search I can't seem to find one I'm not the best internet surfer either but I'd really like to get a infrared filter. Thank you again you have been a lot of help for me 🙂
For those who think we are underwater (water shield) because of its appearance should also know we can also focus on planets near to us. Do that and realise that its not the same effect you get when zooming in on light billions of years in the past. The microwave of space is beyond anyones imagination. God is good but mans mind will execpt lies, the firmament could just be (water in)our atmospheric shield
Thank you 🙏🏽 Yes I guess it’s like that. You can often see that some stars are flickering in the sky, maybe because our atmosphere do something with the light? I am not sure but I like the Arcturus that look almost like the emoji 🌞 (yellow one in the image in the beginning)
The twinkle is created by warm air raising in front of the camera lens. This happens when you hold the camera in your hands. Astro photographers use fans for cooling their telescope mirrors to reduce this effect.
@@ImparatiaTataluiESus you see that the in focus star looks like "nasa" version of stars right? When you are out of focus you geht the light spread our, smeared if you will. That creates this effect. The colours are the light scattering in the atmosphere.
Please explain! What I did was turning in focus as good as I could (smallest possible star), and now its not a Nasa telescope I used, but only camera (used with the digital zoom too). and with all the stuff in our atmosphere this night it could not get better then this. When I focused "beyond infinitive" it got blurred and looked just like flickering flames. (unfocused)
Wow… millennia of war and lore because of blurred primitive stargazers???
Great work and thank you for being my bowling lane bumper!
Wheel within a wheel! Wowww Just like Ezekiel said!
Each star has its own glory. Cymatic patterns. I believe they are angels
You are right!
The Bible says they are 🎉
Stars shining through the waters above !!!!!!!!!! Scripture
If you have eyes you can see
@@newworldawakeningthe elect will see
Amen
As an astronomer, this is a really excellent example of Astronomical Seeing. The patterns you’re observing are the light rays from the star being diffracted by the turbulent air currents in the atmosphere. Just like sunlight scattering on the bottom of a swimming pool, so starlight is scattered by the movement of the atmosphere, producing the effect you see here. The transient sharpness is where the light waves constructively overlap each other, producing momentary ridges of brightness. It’s not just stars that do this; you can observe the same twinkly in the lights of cities far away in the distance near the horizon. Really cool to see this atmospheric phenomenon up close. As astronomers it’s annoying because it smudges out the stars making them a little softer, so we prefer to wait for calm nights where the stars are sharper. The concentric circles you can see inside the star are excellent examples of what's called the Airy Disk: the optical diffraction pattern of the lens aperture.
Just like sunlight scattering at the bottom of a swimming pool exactly because of the waters above the firmament
That wouldn't make any sense. Even if the story were true, in scripture the stars are depicted as being below the waters of the firmament, between the earth and the dome.@@matthewarmy6563
@@matthewarmy6563 That's right bro you're absolutely right
awesome luminaries placed by God
No
@@saucenado4844 well matter isn't created and formed into cohesive units just by pure coincidence, my man
@@changstein how do you know?
@@changstein I guess it's no coincidence that Odin is the father of all creation too?
@@iloveyoursnottyattitude6137 the historical record for Christ and the God of the bible is incredible, and seems to be trustworthy
does anyone see water waves? or is it me that's the only one that sees them
I don´t know.. Or maybe moisture in our atmosphere does the look 🤔
The waters above the firmament
It’s the waters above
Waters above, just like the Bible says
atmosphere
This will make sense to the flat earth Firmament model. Sun and Moon are projections reflecting off the Firmament back to a flat stationary earth, giving light to certain areas as this ancient angelic machine that is producing those projections rotates like a night light with the stars being projections as well, from this same machine that is located in the very center of earth and high above the clouds on some type of ancient mountain or tower. The reflection of the Sun/Moon and Stars off the firmament can see the movement of water behind the firmament. This gives the Moon that wave water look, and the Sun has that liquid moving inside look and stars, but it's the water being seen moving through these lights behind the firmament. That's how the angelic beings whether good or evil sneakily move amongst the background of this firmament blend in and keep watch. How the Holy Angels move back and forth through the Firmament, maybe through portals into the higher Heavens ?
Interesting
Thank you, this video solves most of the UFO footages.
The waters above-- firmament
Firmament !!!
The waters above
Thank you for proving it !!!
This looks backwards... The focused looks unfocused.. and the unfocused looks focused... hmm...
Camera optics are weird like that but he’s doing it right 😂
WE ARE UNDER WATER!
Technically true. There are indeed water molecules floating around in the atmosphere. You may know them as clouds
@@Redeadhunterthe waters above !!
How is it that the unfocused gives higher clarity than the focused
I don´t know but I think it might be because I only used a camera with very small sensor, and also used digital zoom and ha the atmosphere between me and the stars ? And then because the unfocused versions are showing up bigger it might become sharper because of the digital zoom in the camera? Just a guess from my side.
God is real and we are being watched! Definitely not here by mistake like the heliosexuals would have you believe. You are important and God loves you like we love our children 🥰
Amen
I think you’ve got this backwards. Your unfocused version is actually focused and vice versa. Just looking at this without having any knowledge of the subject, it’s easily distinguishable which is focused and which one isn’t. It’s not even about the focus. It’s that you’re zoomed in much further when you can see multiple circles inside one another.
You're wrong. There is a common misconception of how astronomical telescopes work....
For seeing the detail of planets you do want a reasonably high magnification. However stars are so far away that no telescope on earth or even in space can resolve details of a star. A galaxy yes, stars no. For that reason most telescopes designed to image stars do not even have very high magnification. No point. The Hubble telescope for example has magnification of only about x350. What Hubble does have is a big mirror so it can capture a lot of light. This allows it to "see" stars that are so far away they are too faint to see. The Hubble can capture billions of times more light than the human eye.
Because of the above the best images of stars we can expect should be just tiny stationary points of ligh. Even the in focus shots in this video are being made bigger than they should be by limitations in the lenses and atmospheric disturbances.
you are incredibly wrong. that is not how optics works. don't comment on things you dont have knowledge in
Why are your "focussed" images so much smaller, or further away?
Amazingly Focused and unfocused thank you very much
You’re welcome my friend
THAT WAS AWWWWWSOME!!!🔥🔥🔥
They are light bodies,frequencies,,which is what we are when we aren't wearing this meat suit.
Isso mesmo , por isso a nasa tenta nos esconder isso , sao pensamentos a mente sem o corpo biologico
Apenas frequencias se movimentando
Ondas senoidais num balde de agua tem o mesmo efeito
I do not have this camera. But how u can film @12000mm when the cam only can zoom optical up to 3000mm and with digital zoom (not really zoomed) up to 6000mm ?
The camera actually have 4X digital zoom (2x means 3000x2=6000mm and 4x means 3000x4=12000mm, and sometimes just for fun I crop the "4k" video to 1920x1080 wich means I get another 2x of the 12000mm so then I can say the zoom becomes 24000mm. So If just watch at a small screen it does not look bad at all
Awesome video mate!! 👍👍
Thanks 🙏 Glad you liked it 🙂
Brilliant!
All the stars are looking like this ?
Hey my friend; would you mind to give some advices in order to do exactly the same thing? I bought the Nikon p1000 finally;
Which mode do you use?
Which quality?
Fine, normal, RAW RAW+fine?
Video: 2160/25p Or 1080/25p
How to focus properly the stars, moon and the sun?
Please help me! ❤
How do you get a good video of unfocused on p1000 I been trying but I can never get video of what you did just shows until I record
Hmm, I think I just went using manual video and also set the focus to manual So long time now so not 100% sure, but used manual focus for sure
Is water no space
The judges of earth the army of the most high.
Amazing!
Thanks mate! Glad you like it 🙂🙏
How do you know that one is in focus and one is not? I have the same camera and an no where near the camera man you are. My tripod is not the greatest. But I can only ever seem to get them when they are not in focus. My friend had a p900 and could get them to come in focus but I have not had quite the same kuck
Hi, When focus into something small as a star in the night sky I would ALWAYS recomend manual focusing. So that means that when I got the star (a bright one in the sky) to be as small as possible in the display I know its the best focus I can get. And if I go all the way to infinity or can say beyond infinity (all the way to the top in the manual focus line to the right in the camera) then the star become blurry again, just like it be if I focus at the other way from when it be its smallest.
I have an old manfrotto tripod, not super steady but as long as I don´t touch the camera it can be quite still. so when I am focusing manually the star is moving around the whole display then I have to let it stable itself again, then just cut out the most stable parts. Sorry for this long answer but I hope it explain good enough 🙃🙏👍
The Earth is flat by Firmament.
I don't know what it means but I filmed a street light that was pretty far away. It's kind of strange, it looked just how mars or Venus would look when "out" of focus. Tbh it looked exactly like an out of focus star. I'm curious if you ever tried that and what your thoughts on that was
@@jamesfisher4059 Not sure but I think almost every light source would look about the same when out of focus, it more about the colors. But remember thatI am no scientist 😀👍
@@letszoomit365 thanks. You have helped a lot. I've looked online but have not had much luck finding a i.r. filter for my p1000. Do you know where I could find one. I mean I found all kinds for other cameras but every time I do a search I can't seem to find one I'm not the best internet surfer either but I'd really like to get a infrared filter. Thank you again you have been a lot of help for me 🙂
For those who think we are underwater (water shield) because of its appearance should also know we can also focus on planets near to us. Do that and realise that its not the same effect you get when zooming in on light billions of years in the past. The microwave of space is beyond anyones imagination. God is good but mans mind will execpt lies, the firmament could just be (water in)our atmospheric shield
stars dying like a princess dying to much in a tunnel vision
Great, well done. Does the unfocused version create the shapes, lines, colours and flashes that we don't see in the focused one?
Thank you 🙏🏽
Yes I guess it’s like that. You can often see that some stars are flickering in the sky, maybe because our atmosphere do something with the light? I am not sure but I like the Arcturus that look almost like the emoji 🌞 (yellow one in the image in the beginning)
The Earth is flat by Firmament.
ua-cam.com/video/EcUAu79aHW4/v-deo.html
The twinkle is created by warm air raising in front of the camera lens. This happens when you hold the camera in your hands. Astro photographers use fans for cooling their telescope mirrors to reduce this effect.
@@zbyszkokopec1502 It's actually a donut but thanks for trying 👍
top 👍
Thanks 🙏
Why does the focused version look like a blob and unfocused looks crisp and clear, why lie about it unless the truth hurts your butt
Why is your "focused" zoomed way out compared to your "unfocused" and the "focused" looked very blurry just saying
Earth is flat.
😄 If you say so..
@@letszoomit365 This is the truth😁
Hmm, I'm still skeptical 😏
@@letszoomit365 I guess you saw nasa version of these stars (lights in the water above), raw footage compared to the processed bs will never compare.
@@ImparatiaTataluiESus you see that the in focus star looks like "nasa" version of stars right? When you are out of focus you geht the light spread our, smeared if you will. That creates this effect. The colours are the light scattering in the atmosphere.
Learn how to focus a camera correctly. In this day and age, there is zero excuse for not even getting basic focus correct
Please explain!
What I did was turning in focus as good as I could (smallest possible star), and now its not a Nasa telescope I used, but only camera (used with the digital zoom too). and with all the stuff in our atmosphere this night it could not get better then this. When I focused "beyond infinitive" it got blurred and looked just like flickering flames. (unfocused)
@@letszoomit365 judged a bit too soon, at least you know which version is focused vs unfocused. way too many of these style videos dont