Jordan Lewis & Dylan Moore on the Greatest Era
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 вер 2024
- Thanks for watching! Be sure to subscribe, leave a like, comment and be follow us on all our platforms:
Twitter:
/ hawthornfc
Facebook:
/ hawthornfc
Instagram:
/ hawthornfc
TikTok:
/ hawthornfc
And our Official Website:
www.hawthornfc...
Go Hawks!
Won't be long til the Hawks salute yet again. Amazing club.
Time flies, can’t believe it’s been 10 years.
And many more premiership years to come... This new gen are very capable...💪
The good old days
Omg the good old days .. please come back some good old days jordy Looks. Good
2 great players
Rough, Buddy & Taz....there'll never be another draft haul like it.
2007 wasn't bad either, though not as explosive, we picked Cyril Rioli, Brendan Whitecross amd Stewie Dew. Whitecross was the most unlucky player through our most recent successful era. He was a key component of the 2012 and 2013 squads and did knees in both years finals series amd mizsed the entire 2014 season. IMHO Brendan Whitecross deserved to win at least one premiership medallion, maybe two. Such a shame.
Hawkaaassss
holy shit is that all apartments replacing the stands at waverley park now???
Up the hawkers
I love that we have: Dildo, Scrim amd Ginny who were all huge Hawks fans now playing in the Brown and Gold.
Are there any other current players who were Hawthorn fans? It must be like living out a childhood dream, for those lads, to pull on that guernsey and run onto the ground as part of the mighty Hawks outfit. Bloody ripper seeing Lewis, Roughead, Suckling, Duryea, Gibson and Stratts at the 2014 premiership function at the MCG on Saturday too. I hope that Ginny and Punky got up to the lads post our win and shared a few coldies as a team again. What a great era. We'll be there again soon if the improvement keeps up in this fashion. Young talents like: Weddle, McKenzie, Meek, Day, Moore, Scrimshaw, Newcombe, D'Ambrossio, Mitchell, Chol, Ginnivan, Dear, Blanck, Reeves, Jiath, Grainger-Barras.. all are taking huge steps forward. And there are others who haven't even played a match on the seniors who are winnong games for the Box Hill teak week in amd week out. The fiture looks good. Remember, when Tassie comes in we'll have a core of players with 50-150 games experiemce together. Those three-,four years of compromised drafts will mean teams who haven't receuited akd prepared for this eventuality will suffer badly. Before GWS and GC came in we had a core group of players who grew up at Hawthorn together. We added a few pieces of experiemce, Lake, Gibson, McEvoy, Hale etc at key positions and the success came in spades. I reckon we're well placed for finals from 2025-2032. More silverware may be coming pretty soon. Fingers crossed. CARN THE MIGHTY HAWKS!!!
Daisy was a hawk his pop played for hawks! And wardy I believe was a hawk! There is more the new kid we got in mid draft a hawk! Smart recruiting quality players that won't leave! 😊
And don't forget mcabe and chadd! McCabe a gun key back! Chadd an electric half forward! I believe they are nursing gunna punky and chad to get 1 more year for gunna and punk and 2 years for chadd only 30! If we can land a key back end of year in trade and gunna punk chadd Lewis are fit we could win an early cup like 08! It's possible!! But next 10 years are going to be exciting times for club! 🤎💛🏆🏆🏆
Well done lads.
On a separate note ...
I left this comment on Footy On Nine regarding their comments on a particular issue, they want to keep raising ...
'It appears to the majority of people that after the AFL declared 'no findings' in these 'racism ALLEGATIONS' a year on certain 'DISINGENUOUS MEMBERS OF THE MEDIA' are still to a lesser or greater degree automatically taking the side of the claimants collective perception on the basis of colour. But justice is 'colour blind' and it must remain 'colour blind'. The colour of one's skin, eyes or hair have nothing to do with it.
The media who are not a party to the who, what, how and when of this past case are guilty of creating ongoing speculation, 'hysteria' regarding this issue raised purely because one of the claimants is well known and is of a particular colour.
Misapprehensions are misapprehensions. The truth is, the claimants were self victimised by their own ill begotten perceptions of what happened. They presented themselves to be like vulnerable little children when they clearly weren't and appeared to almost want to be victimised, wanted to be victims but did themselves and their cause more harm than good by exaggerating and self misperceiving their own claims. I'm sure they also may have a misapprehension of Australia Day or Anzac Day too. Right? Maybe this is all about education, indoctrination not racism. Let's talk in terms of one Australia. That we're all Australians. One people Etc. Unity!
This was said or that was said, so it must have been wishfully thought as this particular 'ism'. No! an accuser with a particular self created perception cannot be judge, jury and executioner and demand it's this ism or that ism. That's not how the legal system works.
As explained by footballing great Leigh Matthews, even a head nod by a coach can apparently be perceived by a self proclaimed victim as a particular ism. That doesn't mean it is that. And that 'idea' should not be dictated to all and sundry. You can't just go around lighting fires like that.
Despite an Independent neutral AFL panel judging 'no findings' the claimants are still not and never will be satisfied until the accused agrees to their grossly exaggerated perceptions of what occurred.
There was no doubt disagreements were made between these four players and the coaches. But I can't help feel that the actual perception of a key accuser was itself motivated by an outside party who had an agenda. In other words, the accusers were 'mislead' in some way regarding 'wrong think'. The idea that the alleged victims perceptions were going to be automatically credible, accepted or acknowledged etc. Wrong!
They were automatically made credible, acceptable by certain members of the media over the defence. There is a reason we have judges, juries, evidence, court houses, solicitors, barristers etc. No?
These were allegations that were very belatedly declared disagreements by the accusers. There were disagreements between footballers and coaches. That's not unusual. They had opportunities, time to address them way back when. But didn't. This is still unexplained.
Rule number one. One must never ever automatically take sides. Many in the media had taken the side of the accusers and false judgements and prejudices were quickly generated. The media. Legally, the waters were muddied and ongoing hate towards the accused and their families was made to escalate even before a court case was arranged. That in itself is absolutely criminal. The case is over according to the AFL.
Hawthorn's only mistake was to offer 'sympathy funds' to four deluded or misled, yet loved players who suffered under those self conceived misperceptions. For whatever reason they were 'depressed' as were the accused. Or were these accusers misled by a certain legal representative who had his or her own agenda. Deliberate Wrong Think.
It's a mess and it's a mess emanating from the claimants side and the media's side. The courts and the legal system were disrespected.
Hawthorn have been a family club since 1925. The club itself has never been prejudiced against anyone, regarding skin colour, hair colour or eye colour. This has never had anything to do with anything at the club. We all know that. The only colour or colours that are relevant to the club is the famous brown and the gold.
The self proclaimed victims were self-deluded or lead to believe an ism which never existed in reality, to such an extent, they believed their own ill begotten perceptions or the ill begotten perceptions of their biased advisors. They should be happy to know that their perceptions were wrong.
They forgot that the legal system rightly requires the claimants to 'prove' that what they claimed was said was the ism that they're hoping for and is correct. If it's not the ism they're hoping it is, is not what they imaged, it's game over. Their case has collapsed.
Thus far, zero proof has been produced. Early allegations were never made as they enjoyed the success and silverware. If they persist now then I feel Hawthorn and the other falsely accused based on these persistent misperceptions will eventually cause the wrongly accused every right to sue in order to thoroughly clear their good names which have been unfairly and disgracefully dragged through the mud from day one.
The AFL have as said concluded that there is NO wrong doing. Leave at that channel nine.
I personally think the accused and their families and what they've been put through based on a key person's misperceptions is so vile and disgusting it remains as one of the greatest injustices in Australian history. Enough. What has happened is out of court persecution based on unfounded accusations of wild misperceptions.
I think the accused have every right to now proceed with sueing channel nine and others if they persist with using them to create headlines like this. They're human beings not just headline fodder.
I have noticed that as soon as Hawthorn as a football team starts to show great form these ugly false accusations and biased slandering's suddenly reappear. This cat and mouse game has to stop now or Hawthorn should sue. As with 'The Voice' a decision has been concluded. Live with it. Leave it at that. Or be sued.
Let it be'.
CARN THE HAWKS