I watched this film when I was a teenager. Since then, I have watched many other films in this genre but this one is something unique to me that cannot be forgotten! Thank you Mosfilm!
Of all the films I've ever seen, none has come closer to revealing the importance of life on this earth and our relationship to the superior mind of existence! NO others work comes even close to unraveling our mysterious relationship to the cosmos. Time stands still: harken!, we are in the midst of a genius, telling us about relationships between people, past, present, and future! A devotion to our fathers, mistakes of expression, our own mistakes, and readdressing what might have been. A whole existence of our past and readdressing possibilities to correct our own mistakes, even forgiveness, for not always reading right! My favorite film, I can't acknowledge enough. A million directors today wouldn't have a clue.
I was amazed at how many smart and interesting comments there are. I have once again become convinced that real art acts equally on all people, Russians, Americans, ... What is happening now between Russia and America is absolutely nothing compared to the problems that people were struggling with in the film. The main character, in my opinion, expressed the main idea of the film, conscience will save humanity. We all lack conscience right now.
As a Russian, I think Russian art and culture are nothing compared to what Russia does when it kills people and animals, destroys nature and infrastructure and brings so much pain and grief. Sadly, art teaches us nothing.
Спасибо. Любимый фильм. Впервые увидела его мельком в раннем детстве, в начале 70-х, и он меня потряс. Пересматриваю регулярно. Его нужно смотреть небольшими кусочками. Не спешить. Гениально.❤
Incredible how he could make such an incredible movie, with so little money, such basic technology, and Hollywood, with 200 000 times more money, 1000 times more resources, can't do anything even 1/10 of the quality of this...I could watch this movie several times. Cannot finish watching most Hollywood movies.
@@geraldrada The money is the problem. It is too expensive to make Hollywood movies. Even a "low budget" film will cost from 10 to 20 million dollars to make, which is ridiculous. So mostly directors that make safe movies can make it. There are some exceptions to the rule, but not many.
This movie created a profound emptiness within me, awakening a longing I never knew could exist. Yet, not in a negative sense-it's akin to feeling connected to the very fabric of the universe.
Человек часто хочет побыть в одиночестве. Опустошение от рутины,суеты. Выйти из течения и ритма жизни,чтобы принять что-то новое. Ускользающее. Поэтому музыка и театр. Не коммерческое кино. Творец даровал столько всего для того чтобы научиться любить и давать любовь
@@elinal.4625 we are fully connected. without us existence cannot exist and without existence neither would we and so much more magnificence.our real essence is prior to existence.
@@youwelirka1737 Крис оказался слабым дважды: в первый раз когда вполне трусливо побоялся зайти и забрать "препараты" (гордынька, ага!). А второй раз - когда Океан вернул ему эту девушку, правда, сделанную из необычной субстанции. Но Крис засс.ал опять, потому что если он и первую не любил - то с какого перепуга он должен был полюбить замену? Ох уж эти мне слабые мужичОнки! Кстати, И у Лема эта тема выведена достаточно прозрачно - трусить, опасться, переживать из за невероятности происходящего, одним слофом, "кофту мять", как говорили мы в студенческие времена. А потом сидеть у океана и ждать неизвестно чего.
To me ending is just heartbreaking. No matter how deep into space humanity advances, the best dreams will still be about childhood, home and young parents.
That may have been what Lem disliked about the film. As I recall in this novel the hero strives in spite of losses to continue to communicate with the Ocean. Lem wrote other material analyzing humanity (Return from the stars). In this one Kris is being pushed to go on solving the riddles of Solaris.
does the end mean that he stayed behind on the planet? Or did the planet's intelligence return to earth with him, surrounding him with protection and insulation? Wonderfully open ending, though not near so spectacular as 2001
I've seen this movie a couple of times. People talk about the themes, imagery etc., but one of the reasons it works for me is the actress that plays "Hari", she emotes pain and humanity very well.
Natalia is definitely a chip off the old block. See "The Fate of a Man" by Sergey Bondarchuk and you'll understand why. That's another great Soviet movie; a different style but amazing.
Tarkovsky's least favorite of his films, but in my mind, a masterpiece. Solaris teaches us that we must embrace our memories, no matter how imperfect they may be, to preserve our humanity.
@@redpimpletonthesimpleton8812 He did. Lem's novel has nothing to do with Tarkovsky's film. It's not even close. In fact, Lem denounced the Solaris film because of that. Look online if you want more details.
At a time of fierce competition on every level between the US and the USSR, Stanley Kubrick's "2001: A Space Odyssey" comes out in 1968 to show the Russians, and the world, how space movies (science fiction with deeper messages about human evolution, existentialism, technology, artificial intelligence and the possibility of extra terrestrial life) are made...The Soviets respond with this film "Solaris" in 1972 dismissing Kubrick's work (which has in fact been called the finest science fiction film EVER) as "phoney on many points" and "a lifeless schema with only pretensions to truth". Soviet director Andrei Tarkovsky is given this task, who, in the spirit of healthy competition, and as a consequence of it, comes up with an equally authentic, controversial but undisputed masterpiece and a proud addition to the list of the greatest movies ever made, with universal appeal and most talked about and thought provoking films in history to boot...Thanks for another terrific upload.
@@ThePolistiren he left in 1979 and made only two movies during his life in Italy..he was born in USSR, educated there and made movies based out of USSR ..so I don’t know what’s the issue with calling him soviet ..his wiki page calls him so! He stated, «I am not a Soviet dissident, I have no conflict with the Soviet Government," but if he returned home, he added, "I would be unemployed. » There are many people who move out of their country for various reasons and continue to be called from their native place ..but I guess nothing good can ever be ascribed to USSR ?
Luckily in a 300 years we probably won't be discussing f****ng politics while watching this movie, just as we don't make renaissance painters' works a political matter. Just enjoy the art
@@richardosborne2067 Well, I understand it sounds like contradiction in terms, but i use the term ''true science fiction'' as opposed to movies which I regard as science fiction fairytales like Star Wars. Maybe I should have omitted ''true'' and use only ''serious''.
@@beatleboy83 Not really because he makes these types of films for everyone in humanity that wants to be given a new standpoint of life, but since I read The Brothers Karamazov and Crime and Punishment I understood more and more Tarkovsky's archetypes in his films
A fabulous film. I hunted it down when I was about the world on archeological digs near the Ural Nature Reserve. The demise of the director is saddening. He was so committed to the art. Glad to see it on a public platform. I believe that the director would have wanted it this way.
Grandissimi registi europei e americani degli anni 70/80, veramente superlativi, a Tarkovskij, come si suol dire, :" je spicciavano casa" e t'ho detto tutto. Lui, veramente era " quell'altro pianeta" 🎥✨🪐. GENIO SPAZIALE .
Strange seeing an old movie like this in such high quality, like it was made yesterday. Something like this really can transport you into a different time.
when was it made? I've only seen a few Russian made movies, and I don't like trying to compare them to American made movies, but this gave me such strong 2001: A Space Odyssey vibes with how it was shot.
Thank you for this magnificent restoration and with subtitles no less. I love how slowly and deliberately Tarkovsky introduces information in long takes. He edited in his mind and let the camera work.
I was lucky enough to see the restoration on the big screen and was hypnotised , blown away. A powerful and epic treatise on stillness of the soul and remaining centered while all around chaos reigns. A zen experience and a picture that changes your perception forever ❤
Andrei Tarkavosky will remain one of the greatest auteurs of world cinema. The way he blends environment with emotional depth is mesmerizing. This one is my personal favourite
For me personally, this is such a stunning and frank film that I simply do not have words to describe my admiration for it. )🎬 I’ve watched it a million times and will watch it again just as many times. I'm still discovering something new in this film. None of us can escape our own Solaris. Solaris... It is inside each of us. I am grateful to all the Creators of this Masterpiece of World Science Fiction today. 🎓 ✨ 🎥
I got hypnotically drawn into watching this movie for the fourth time! [The first time was in an LA theater when it premiered there in 1972!] It's so beautifully photographed. The famous Russian actress, Natalia Bonderchuk is the amazing star: the liquid oxygen sequence, her library speeches, but hey! her whole performance. I learn more every time I watch this. Like 2001, much of the movie is silent and told visually! Wow! Such artistry! And PS to Syrka, Stanislaw Lem is the best science fiction writer in the world---I've read 15 of his books!
@@alexandrmatheev1407 не огорчайтесь, эволюционные процессы развития человечества неизбежны. Но всё встанет на свои места. А русский менталитет возьмет свое. Будут снова в России композиторы и музыканты, писатели и поэты, режиссеры и актеры. Я из России, я вижу что моя страна практически прошла тяжелый период в своей истории. Я вижу, сколько сейчас молодежи интересуются искусством и идут этому учиться. Я уже сейчас читаю русскую научную фантастику молодых русских писателей.
WOW! This is amazing! I already had this movie on Bluray, but now I can watch this movie on my laptop when I'm away from home in full HD. Thank you so much Mosfilm!
I watched Stalker for the first time ever last night. I started to watch it around about 23:00pm and once it started the tiredness I’d felt before completely drifted away and i was captivated in an experience i haven’t felt in years when it comes to a movie and afterwards i slept so peacefully. It truly is a masterpiece in the art of cinema…oh i went out and bought the blu ray and I’ve just ordered Zona by Geoff Dyer because i have a need to find out as much as i can about Stalker
Taking into account the fact that the original Stalker was completely lost during filming (faulty film) and what we see in the end is a fifty-fifty re-shot work that visually has nothing to do with lost original.
Some might say it does need some whittling down, especially the scene of Burton driving on the Tokyo expressway. But the more I watch that, the whole scene, without fast-forwarding it or skipping ahead, the more sense it makes. Burton's anxiety, his sense of futility that he failed, are made clear. I lived in Tokyo at the time that scene was filmed and I remember my dad, who was driving, laughed at how short the expressway was. It only took about the same time to run it as the whole movie scene. Since then Tokyo has extended their highway system and some years later I drove a good ways out of Tokyo to Mt. Fuji on it.
Read & listened to the novel several times, including the latest translation, watched & enjoyed both theatrical versions, & listened to a very interesting BBC Radio adaptation that is available here on UA-cam. Always find something new to contemplate in this timeless masterpiece.
We are the sum of our experience and regrets, and in a way Solaris knows the crew as well as anything can. I've watched this movie twice, but was interrupted both times halfway through. I've just watched it till the end. Oh it's heart breaking ... and beautiful ...
Wonderful... First saw this in 1973 ( wow... 50 years ago...) and now on UA-cam... I can still recall, perfectly, the scene, from 44:29 to 45:27, as we approach the Space Station, with the ocean surface of Solaris beneath... And at the end, from 2:45:30 to 2:46:19, as we pull away from the planet, and see the only small island... Amazing film...
I think without doubt its the most intelligent and deepest thinking sci-fi film of all time. I rate this along with 2001 masterpieces of cinema and unlike Solaris the original version of the story shall never be bettered (ok technically Solaris has been done 3 times as there was an earlier version before Tarkovsky did this one) I love how it takes an alien lifeform, a sentient ocean that can probe our minds in order to communicate with us by looking to our pasts. Wether you accept it or not see it as pleasure or pain is another thing that only individuals can answer. Still a fascinating concept and this version is well shot with beautiful photography with images that never leave your brain and great performances all round. This shows that Russia could turn out quality cinema and its a pity its not better known that it is in the world of sci-fi cinema. Stanislaw Lem never liked any of the versions of his novel but thats authors for you, for me that only one view the public decides otherwise what resonates with them and rightly so.
Я в шоке! Где меня уронили? Где не дали дышать кислородом? Где, бл, шедевр? В чём? Если "Ханума" Товстоногого шедевр - это шедевр! Если "Они сражались за Родину" Бондарчука шедевр - это шедевр! Если "Тихий Дон" Герасимова шедевр - это шедевр! Что здесь шедеврального? Имя Тарковского, а за именем пустота? Ору!
No olviden que Kubrick y Tarkowsky eran rusos y Rusia una de las naciones con más talento artístico en todos los terrenos:música, pintura, poesia, novela, cine, escultura.. Este legado, esta herencia para el mundo, para la civilización es incuetionable. Gracias
yep but now the word associates Russians with war crimes, military incompetence, authoritarianism, and alcoholism. It sucks because there is so much more to the place than these negative things.
@@Lobatomic Not Russian at all. Kubrick was polish, Romanian, Austrian, and Jewish. Even if Kubrick was full blooded Russian he was raised in the Bronx. He was American raised in the mixing pot environment of New York.
Great movie of its time! Electronic music and sound effects! And the phrase that "shame might be the only thing needed to save mankind" is the epitome of conciousness that seperates humans from animals.
@@offbeat65 production design was just means, and not the goal, as it is today. It's just there for you to understand where you are - it serves no purpose for the meaning of the film.
True No? I realy Love the Details about culture The Statues the Peruan mask The old guns Like the Bring Something to remind Them of humanity See the Film today the First time I read Lem a Lot in my childhood/youth now 25 years Later i discover that Art of a move Loved it
My all time favourite movie! A heartbreaking masterpiece by the greatest film director ever. Also the eeriest, spookiest psychological drama I've ever seen. Beautifully photographed and posted in similarly wonderful quality, with lovely, new, well-readable subtitles. Thank you Mosfilm!👍♥️
@@mayoofm6049 no, its fine. there is no jumpscare or anything like that, trust me im a scaredy cat as well and even i manage to finish this film. please watch it, it wont disappoint you or waste your time.
Some twenty years ago a friend told me Solaris was his favorite sci-fi movie and now when we are on the brink of a new era I finally watched this film. I have trained myself to look for simulareties and parallels with the current agenda's of the current power mongering ruling classes when I watch a sci fi movie. But Solaris is a league of its own. Great movie.
This man, was King of Greece. It's a parody. He is the father of the future president of the world, UNOM, Niklaus. He's living in England. This movie it's a revelation. Tarkovsky works real hard in this project, trying to exposed this man. It's not just another feary tale.
I still remember watching the film for the first time. It started at 1.00 AM, and I had a train to catch at 6 AM! But I was entranced. Tarkovsky was really THE poet of the cinema.
In a conversation between Martin Scorsese and Krystoff Zanussi, the former said to the polish master that many people in the West think that in socialists countries was scarce artistic freedom, but that he was completly sure that films like "Ivan´s Chilhood", "Andrei Rubliov", or this one would have never been possible in Hollywood: symply NEVER. And Zanussi agreed.
Let's dismantle this commie shit: Tarkovski was constantly censored and persecuted for his spiritual themes in his movies and criticism of the soviet union, to the point he fled to Italy after finishing STALKER, Come and See was delayed 8 years due to censorship, The Colour Of Pomegranates's director was under KGB watch and constantly had trouble with the law, Aleksei German, same story. As for Hollywood, they were receiving funding from the Russians according to declassified KGB documents. And even in the current day, they persecute ideological dissidents like Gina Carano or Kevin Sorbo. Let's be frank, each and every artistic achievement in film was made in spite of the Soviet & Hollywood systems.
@@ThePolistiren Excuse me: who exactly is spreading "communist shit": Martin Scorsese, Kristoff Zanussi or me? The reference came from an interview, in english language , made to Zanussi himself available on UA-cam. What you say does not deny the very point made by them. Of course there was censorship in the USSR, and remains in Russia today. So? Tarkovsky did make about 6 films in his motherland that could hardly had been made in Hollywood. A fact. In the USA the situation was not very different: just check Dalton Trumbo´s or Joseph Losey´s cases (among other victims of MCarthyism) and, more recently, the testimonies from Andrei Konchalovsky, who went back to Russia to continue his career after finding out that in Hollywood creativity freedom for film makers is even worse than in Russia.
@@ThePolistiren even Georges Lucas calls bullshit on your crap opinion. Yes the Soviet Union was oppressive ans autocratic and censored a lot beyond criticizing the state and atheism Soviet film makers could make whatever art house film they wanted as opposed to the West where you're obligated to make blockbuster films that adhere to a set of criteria aimed only to generate revenue, else you won't get funded.
I've seen this movie twice, but it was in the mid-1970s. The first time was the three and a half hour version; second was "only" two and a half. My friends and I loved it both times. The cloud scenes in the long version were often a couple of minutes of pure white screen. We marveled that anyone in management would allow that.
The first time I saw it was a year ago on TMC. While watching this post I noticed that scenes were cut. I didn’t realize there was a short and long cut of the movie.
I've seen this movie many times over many years, and I find something new every time. I've read the book before I saw it first time; I was young and foolish, and was a bit disappointed by the deviation from Lem's story initially, but appreciated it more and more every time I rewatched. It makes my eyes wet now. Amazing cinematography, story telling, acting. A true masterpiece.
Truly the scene of which Chris is placed with the young version of his mother has such an unreal depth of his placement in the present, visiting the past, in his future form. Absolutely brilliant work.
Second viewing for me. I needed all the subtitles to fill so many gaps. One of my favorite films of all time. I still need to explain to myself what exactly it means. What a performance by Natalya Bondarchuk!
Update. I'm reading Lem's book! The guy who played Snow evidently did a good job too. The book is just fantastic and it's filling in my gaps. I suspect Lem had scientific training; I'll guess . . biology. What an imagination Lem had. Btw, I betcha this was inspired by the work of French zoologist/philosopher Pierre Teilhard de Chardin.
@@beepbeep_moo I was hoping I would like this as it came so highly recommended, but I sadly have to agree with your assessment. It's long, and slow paced and very poorly explained. Does a movie this long need a five minute sequence that just shows a car driving somewhere??? 😂
Какой гениальный Андрей Тарковский. Оставил нам свой шедевр. Смотрю не знаю в какой раз. И поражаюсь опять. Какие краски, какая музыка. Как он показал красоту нашей планеты Земля. Обратила внимание на детали. Главный герой вначале фильма взьерошенный какой то, имею в виду прическу. Я думала так ходили. И в конце фильма аккуратно причесан. Значит это специально. Крис просто что то понял пройдя через все испытания и успокоился в душе.
Thank you for uploading this historic Sci-Fi film that has been reputed by experts to be the most philosophic of this kind. I'd like to add: iconic, pious and much much more ...
My favourite Tarkovsky film. Excellently achieved. Read several Lem books back when Britain still imported and translated books from places other than Japan or Scandinavia. Often wondered whether the plot was about people on the inside looking out a greater world / universe and barely beginning to understand before being changed and perhaps destroyed by something unknowable outside their experience. Like being inside one political structure that governs everything, but not what is outside itself. Such as reality, people and their deepest needs.
This film, like the book, is very Lovecraftian. Much better than the other Solaris film. Solaris, is a scientific mystery and thriller, a psychological mystery and thriller and a thriller about first contact. This film is very much closer to the book. Well done!
I have only watched the Clooney version and found the premise very intriguing. It is a story-driven play, not needing fantastic cgi/special effects to be compelling.
I definitely agree with you. But, apparently, Tarkovsky loathed 2001: A Space Odyssey, which I find very surprising given the fact that both directors were superb artists of the highest caliber.
@@ryokan9120 I disagree with Tarkovsky on his opinion of 200: ASO. He said he didn't see the humanity in it. Too much was given over to technology. But that was necessary to establish the setting of the story. Nor do I think humanity is missing from it. The characters, especially Floyd, his daughter, the Russians, observers who accompany him to the Monolith, and most of all Bowman, show a lot of human feeling, or they fight against it at appropriate times given their situations.
@@dondragmer2412 Yes, I completely agree with you. It makes me wonder if Tarkovsky suffered from jealousy or envy towards 2001? Tarkovsky was an artistic genius and surely he would have recognized the artistic genius of Kubrick?
when you actually realize there is more than 0% chance that both Snaut and Sartorius are copies created by Guiderian(while he was still alive and who killed himself because he could not stand it) and that kelvin actually is the only human on the station, all conversations hit entirely different ...
Thanks ... Always loved this movie ... One of Tarkovsky's best, even though Lem didn't like it very much. Anyway, it's wonderful to share this with everyone...
I was young and working for a Russian guy that used to own a couple of movie theaters, Artkino Pictures, was the name of his company and Cosmos 70 the name of one of the theaters. I used to do the inventory of the movies in a basement, I remember this movie in particular because of the promo posters and pictures and I used to take reels of film and took this movie's reel as well in 35 mm from one movie theater to the other one, back in the 70's 🎥...
I watched this after losing my wife to cancer & had moved on to another relationship, which made the experience extremely harrowing for me, as in imagining myself how I would react in those circumstances. Brilliant anyhow & as in his Mirror & Lars von Trier's Melancholia, Breughal's Hunters in the Snow was an extra.
I know about Tarkovski, but it's been years since I watched any of his films. I can see his influence everywhere. I'm constantly thinking to myself as I watch, 'seen Friedkin use that..seen PT Anderson use that...'
The Restoration of this film is just wonderful. I've got an old copy of this film on DVD but this one looks much much better than my copy. I think it is very important to see Classic Films in the best quality possible. Could it be possible to have Eisenstein / Ivan The Terrible First and Second Part with this great quality? Thanks so much for uploading these great films and Greetings from Spain.
One of my favorites movies. Love it. Deep meditation on the morality and ethics of metaphysics and philosophy. Very existentialist in its themes and atmosphere. I think it’s superior to 2001 A Space Odyssey.
Thank you for posting this film. I needed it. Maybe one of the best films i'v ever seen. The acting was wonderful. What a performance by the exquisitely beautiful Natalia Bonderchuck. The film left me with all kinds of emotions. Very absorbing. Wish i had a copy to keep. Thanks again.
This was Tarkovsky's answer to 2001, which is really( despite its visual brilliance) a cold, mechanical look at technology in the future with the computer showing the most human qualities: Solaris was warm, full blooded, full of humanity, the beauty of the Earth and art, anchored more in reality.
And thank you Mosfilm for ensuring these films are advert-free.
this would fckd up, because its not his content
@@Modagon Please explain.
@@Modagonwut?
@@Modagon You do understand that Mosfilm is the company that produced these films?
@@Modagon The expert hath spoken.
I watched this film when I was a teenager. Since then, I have watched many other films in this genre but this one is something unique to me that cannot be forgotten!
Thank you Mosfilm!
Of all the films I've ever seen, none has come closer to revealing the importance of life on this earth and our relationship to the superior mind of existence! NO others work comes even close to unraveling our mysterious relationship to the cosmos. Time stands still: harken!, we are in the midst of a genius, telling us about relationships between people, past, present, and future! A devotion to our fathers, mistakes of expression, our own mistakes, and readdressing what might have been. A whole existence of our past and readdressing possibilities to correct our own mistakes, even forgiveness, for not always reading right! My favorite film, I can't acknowledge enough. A million directors today wouldn't have a clue.
Try reading the book it is even deeper. But different.
I was amazed at how many smart and interesting comments there are. I have once again become convinced that real art acts equally on all people, Russians, Americans, ... What is happening now between Russia and America is absolutely nothing compared to the problems that people were struggling with in the film. The main character, in my opinion, expressed the main idea of the film, conscience will save humanity. We all lack conscience right now.
As a Russian, I think Russian art and culture are nothing compared to what Russia does when it kills people and animals, destroys nature and infrastructure and brings so much pain and grief. Sadly, art teaches us nothing.
@@soloma49
Merveilleuse Analyse !
Merci pour votre Commentaire.
One of the greatest movies I have ever seen. Truly a masterpiece
Спасибо. Любимый фильм. Впервые увидела его мельком в раннем детстве, в начале 70-х, и он меня потряс. Пересматриваю регулярно. Его нужно смотреть небольшими кусочками. Не спешить. Гениально.❤
Solaris is not only my favorite Tarkovsky but in my opinion is one of the top ten greatest films ever made.
what are the 10 best films for you?
Incredible how he could make such an incredible movie, with so little money, such basic technology, and Hollywood, with 200 000 times more money, 1000 times more resources, can't do anything even 1/10 of the quality of this...I could watch this movie several times. Cannot finish watching most Hollywood movies.
@@geraldrada The money is the problem. It is too expensive to make Hollywood movies. Even a "low budget" film will cost from 10 to 20 million dollars to make, which is ridiculous. So mostly directors that make safe movies can make it. There are some exceptions to the rule, but not many.
Very true!
I agree ☝️
An excellent movie based on an excellent novel by Stanislaw Lem, who should be considered one of the best science fiction authors of all times.
Based on a true story, this man it's real. He was King of Greece.
@@ALMATURYAH-t6i Last of the Eastern Roman Emperor
@@ALMATURYAH-t6i "Based on a true story"? It's based on Lem's science fiction novel, "Solaris", which is fiction. It's an excellent book, though.
He was soviet hence an antisemite, a genocidal and a homophobic
レム自身は不満だったそうだね
理解しえないことを描きたかったそうだ
This movie created a profound emptiness within me, awakening a longing I never knew could exist. Yet, not in a negative sense-it's akin to feeling connected to the very fabric of the universe.
Могу сказать, что Вы ухватили одну из главных черт русского менталитета
Человек часто хочет побыть в одиночестве. Опустошение от рутины,суеты. Выйти из течения и ритма жизни,чтобы принять что-то новое. Ускользающее. Поэтому музыка и театр. Не коммерческое кино. Творец даровал столько всего для того чтобы научиться любить и давать любовь
@@elinal.4625 we are fully connected. without us existence cannot exist and without existence neither would we and so much more magnificence.our real essence is prior to existence.
@@youwelirka1737 Крис оказался слабым дважды: в первый раз когда вполне трусливо побоялся зайти и забрать "препараты" (гордынька, ага!). А второй раз - когда Океан вернул ему эту девушку, правда, сделанную из необычной субстанции. Но Крис засс.ал опять, потому что если он и первую не любил - то с какого перепуга он должен был полюбить замену? Ох уж эти мне слабые мужичОнки! Кстати, И у Лема эта тема выведена достаточно прозрачно - трусить, опасться, переживать из за невероятности происходящего, одним слофом, "кофту мять", как говорили мы в студенческие времена. А потом сидеть у океана и ждать неизвестно чего.
Why is Mosfilm providing so much great content for free? This is literally a treasure trove of films! 🎉
Nostalgiah needs a better Master. It looks pretty shitty, sadly..
Советское наследие для народа
@@xzenislevx yes
Socialism 🙃🙃
Not everyone on Earth is thinking "the American way" .. to sell something or to make profit
To me ending is just heartbreaking. No matter how deep into space humanity advances, the best dreams will still be about childhood, home and young parents.
That may have been what Lem disliked about the film. As I recall in this novel the hero strives in spite of losses to continue to communicate with the Ocean. Lem wrote other material analyzing humanity (Return from the stars). In this one Kris is being pushed to go on solving the riddles of Solaris.
@@zvimur Lem and Tarkovsky had a nasty and disgusting character, probably geniuses are all like that!
Unless of course your childhood were an abusive nightmare you would rather forget.
does the end mean that he stayed behind on the planet? Or did the planet's intelligence return to earth with him, surrounding him with protection and insulation? Wonderfully open ending, though not near so spectacular as 2001
@@_scabs6669 the most popular interpretation seems to be he died/became part of Solaris (a living entity of unknown qualities).
I've seen this movie a couple of times. People talk about the themes, imagery etc., but one of the reasons it works for me is the actress that plays "Hari", she emotes pain and humanity very well.
She is a daughter of "War and Peace" director (he played Pierre as well).
Natalia is definitely a chip off the old block. See "The Fate of a Man" by Sergey Bondarchuk and you'll understand why. That's another great Soviet movie; a different style but amazing.
... and "Hari" is the only one with human emotions, passions, humanism. The rest, including Chris, are crazy eccentrics and self-absorbed narcissists.
Tarkovsky's least favorite of his films, but in my mind, a masterpiece. Solaris teaches us that we must embrace our memories, no matter how imperfect they may be, to preserve our humanity.
@@redpimpletonthesimpleton8812 He did. Lem's novel has nothing to do with Tarkovsky's film. It's not even close. In fact, Lem denounced the Solaris film because of that. Look online if you want more details.
@@redpimpletonthesimpleton8812 Not the book, but he co-wrote the film's screenplay (which deviates from the book).
"Shame is the feeling which will save humankind."
Why is it his least favorite?
@@SenkaBanditHe regarded him as the most inconsistent and junk piece of his own work.
At a time of fierce competition on every level between the US and the USSR, Stanley Kubrick's "2001: A Space Odyssey" comes out in 1968 to show the Russians, and the world, how space movies (science fiction with deeper messages about human evolution, existentialism, technology, artificial intelligence and the possibility of extra terrestrial life) are made...The Soviets respond with this film "Solaris" in 1972 dismissing Kubrick's work (which has in fact been called the finest science fiction film EVER) as "phoney on many points" and "a lifeless schema with only pretensions to truth". Soviet director Andrei Tarkovsky is given this task, who, in the spirit of healthy competition, and as a consequence of it, comes up with an equally authentic, controversial but undisputed masterpiece and a proud addition to the list of the greatest movies ever made, with universal appeal and most talked about and thought provoking films in history to boot...Thanks for another terrific upload.
"The Soviets"
Tarkovski was a dissident and fled to Italy. The USSR holds no ownership of his works.
@@ThePolistiren he left in 1979 and made only two movies during his life in Italy..he was born in USSR, educated there and made movies based out of USSR ..so I don’t know what’s the issue with calling him soviet ..his wiki page calls him so! He stated, «I am not a Soviet dissident, I have no conflict with the Soviet Government," but if he returned home, he added, "I would be unemployed. » There are many people who move out of their country for various reasons and continue to be called from their native place ..but I guess nothing good can ever be ascribed to USSR ?
@@ThePolistiren Let's dismantle the fact that you chat shit Radu.
Nobody went to the moon. Space it's an empty place. Fiction it's an illusion.
Luckily in a 300 years we probably won't be discussing f****ng politics while watching this movie, just as we don't make renaissance painters' works a political matter. Just enjoy the art
Τhis is one of the few SERIOUS AND TRUE Science Fiction movies and a Tarkovski masterpiece. I wanted so much to see it again ! Thanks for uploading !
@theo9952 how's it true if it's fiction lol?
@@richardosborne2067 Well, I understand it sounds like contradiction in terms, but i use the term ''true science fiction'' as opposed to movies which I regard as science fiction fairytales like Star Wars. Maybe I should have omitted ''true'' and use only ''serious''.
One of the greatest films ever made! Exploring the universe = exploring one's inner psyche. Tarkovsky = Shakespeare of the film-makers.
I find him much more similar to Russian authors. His dialogues are full of Dostoevskyan tropes.
@@davidbastardo4154 Yes. I also think that one cannot fully understand (or explore the beauty of) Tarkovsky without being a Russian himself.
@@beatleboy83 Not really because he makes these types of films for everyone in humanity that wants to be given a new standpoint of life, but since I read The Brothers Karamazov and Crime and Punishment I understood more and more Tarkovsky's archetypes in his films
I like this so much better than the gratuitous violence of some directors - Tarantino are you listening?!
@@davidbastardo4154 It's based on a book by Stanisław Lem.
A fabulous film. I hunted it down when I was about the world on archeological digs near the Ural Nature Reserve. The demise of the director is saddening. He was so committed to the art. Glad to see it on a public platform. I believe that the director would have wanted it this way.
Eagle 1! 😮
Grandissimi registi europei e americani degli anni 70/80, veramente superlativi, a Tarkovskij, come si suol dire, :" je spicciavano casa" e t'ho detto tutto. Lui, veramente era " quell'altro pianeta" 🎥✨🪐. GENIO SPAZIALE .
I am imagining my dad watching this in 72’ at the movie theater. And now I finally got to join him in this experience. Спасибо 🙏
@@LeonidDragun rest in peace ✌
Strange seeing an old movie like this in such high quality, like it was made yesterday. Something like this really can transport you into a different time.
when was it made? I've only seen a few Russian made movies, and I don't like trying to compare them to American made movies, but this gave me such strong 2001: A Space Odyssey vibes with how it was shot.
@@kingscorpion7346 1972 , and i agree about the 2001 "feel"
… especially as I’m watching on a 4.7” iPhone SE screen. It’s still immersive held close to my face.
@@Microdisney 👍LOL😁
@@Microdisney Тарковского надо смотреть на широком экране
Thank you for this magnificent restoration and with subtitles no less. I love how slowly and deliberately Tarkovsky introduces information in long takes. He edited in his mind and let the camera work.
Been watching from my youth, now 70.
Still chokes me up.
Bless you fellow, feeling human being❤
I'm listening to Bach, ready to embark my 2nd viewing and choking already on Bach...xx
I was lucky enough to see the restoration on the big screen and was hypnotised , blown away. A powerful and epic treatise on stillness of the soul and remaining centered while all around chaos reigns. A zen experience and a picture that changes your perception forever ❤
Were you hypnotized by the jerking of the camera on a tripod? or gray jelly?
One of the greatest movies of all time.
Amongst the best movies ever made .
@@scitsalcoryp да.. После Сталкера..
@@ГелийПолитехнический там тема другая
I can't believe this film is on UA-cam !A marvel !Thanks for sharing !
Mosfilm
Andrei Tarkavosky will remain one of the greatest auteurs of world cinema. The way he blends environment with emotional depth is mesmerizing. This one is my personal favourite
Correct
💯
Unforgettable! Enjoyed every second of watching this masterpiece.
32:11 ここからの東京の首都高速のシーンは、本来、監督のタルコフスキーが当時大阪で開催された大阪万博での各パビリオンでの撮影を希望していたものの政府や主催側の許可が下りず、滞在先のホテルから移動する際に通過した首都高速の風景に近未来の風景として感銘を受けたタルコフスキーが幾度も撮影したという逸話がある。撮影当時の１９７０年の都心の光景が記録されている貴重な映像でもある。
公開当時に映画館で、首都高を走る日本車を見たときは白けたのですが、いま（20230505）に見ると素晴らしいですね
タルコフスキー監督のセンスで切り取られた70年万博の会場（一度は遠足で、もう一度はい父親と行き、ソ連館の月の石も見たはずです）も見たかったですが
Тарковский гений. Актеры замечательные, сьемки потрясающие! Мой любимый фильм, моя любимая книга.
Fantastic! Much better than the modern version. Couldn't look away
One of the most extraordinary films ever made - a work of great beauty and poetry with brilliant visuals.
For me personally, this is such a stunning and frank film that I simply do not have words to describe my admiration for it. )🎬 I’ve watched it a million times and will watch it again just as many times. I'm still discovering something new in this film. None of us can escape our own Solaris. Solaris... It is inside each of us. I am grateful to all the Creators of this Masterpiece of World Science Fiction today. 🎓 ✨ 🎥
Аналогично!
I got hypnotically drawn into watching this movie for the fourth time! [The first time was in an LA theater when it premiered there in 1972!] It's so beautifully photographed. The famous Russian actress, Natalia Bonderchuk is the amazing star: the liquid oxygen sequence, her library speeches, but hey! her whole performance. I learn more every time I watch this. Like 2001, much of the movie is silent and told visually! Wow! Such artistry! And PS to Syrka, Stanislaw Lem is the best science fiction writer in the world---I've read 15 of his books!
Also she is a daughter of Serguey Bondarchuk, director of "War and peace" and eight other movies.
My favourite movie... I cry for the impossible tragic beauty, the style... dialogues... actors.. an heartbreaking masterpiece.. thank you ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
An era in the development of mankind that we have lost forever. Even in Russia, such films are rare.
@@alexandrmatheev1407 не огорчайтесь, эволюционные процессы развития человечества неизбежны. Но всё встанет на свои места. А русский менталитет возьмет свое. Будут снова в России композиторы и музыканты, писатели и поэты, режиссеры и актеры. Я из России, я вижу что моя страна практически прошла тяжелый период в своей истории. Я вижу, сколько сейчас молодежи интересуются искусством и идут этому учиться. Я уже сейчас читаю русскую научную фантастику молодых русских писателей.
@@АндрейЗорин-е7г Спасибо бро.
WOW! This is amazing! I already had this movie on Bluray, but now I can watch this movie on my laptop when I'm away from home in full HD. Thank you so much Mosfilm!
Brilliant, absolutely brilliant! This and "Stalker" are masterpieces of science fiction! Tarkovsky clearly was a master of his craft.
great film
I watched Stalker for the first time ever last night. I started to watch it around about 23:00pm and once it started the tiredness I’d felt before completely drifted away and i was captivated in an experience i haven’t felt in years when it comes to a movie and afterwards i slept so peacefully. It truly is a masterpiece in the art of cinema…oh i went out and bought the blu ray and I’ve just ordered Zona by Geoff Dyer because i have a need to find out as much as i can about Stalker
Taking into account the fact that the original Stalker was completely lost during filming (faulty film) and what we see in the end is a fifty-fifty re-shot work that visually has nothing to do with lost original.
@@kyojima7190 if what we got was that good imagine how good the original was 🤔
@@kyojima7190 that is heartbreaking!
Some might say it does need some whittling down, especially the scene of Burton driving on the Tokyo expressway. But the more I watch that, the whole scene, without fast-forwarding it or skipping ahead, the more sense it makes. Burton's anxiety, his sense of futility that he failed, are made clear. I lived in Tokyo at the time that scene was filmed and I remember my dad, who was driving, laughed at how short the expressway was. It only took about the same time to run it as the whole movie scene. Since then Tokyo has extended their highway system and some years later I drove a good ways out of Tokyo to Mt. Fuji on it.
The expressway sequence is, I think, Tarkovsky's reply to the psychedlic journey at the end of 2001, particularly its use of distorted sound.
Fasciniating insight into the Tokyo expressway.
Thank you Mosfilm for providing readable subtitles ..
we were always fighting in the past .. struggling
thank you for the nice clarity
Wow! It's so great that these amazing films are available here!
THANK YOU
Read & listened to the novel several times, including the latest translation, watched & enjoyed both theatrical versions, & listened to a very interesting BBC Radio adaptation that is available here on UA-cam. Always find something new to contemplate in this timeless masterpiece.
We are the sum of our experience and regrets, and in a way Solaris knows the crew as well as anything can. I've watched this movie twice, but was interrupted both times halfway through. I've just watched it till the end. Oh it's heart breaking ... and beautiful ...
Wonderful... First saw this in 1973 ( wow... 50 years ago...) and now on UA-cam... I can still recall, perfectly, the scene, from 44:29 to 45:27, as we approach the Space Station, with the ocean surface of Solaris beneath... And at the end, from 2:45:30 to 2:46:19, as we pull away from the planet, and see the only small island... Amazing film...
Bzzzt... spoiler! 😉
Simply amazing. Thank You Tarkovsky!
I think without doubt its the most intelligent and deepest thinking sci-fi film of all time. I rate this along with 2001 masterpieces of cinema and unlike Solaris the original version of the story shall never be bettered (ok technically Solaris has been done 3 times as there was an earlier version before Tarkovsky did this one) I love how it takes an alien lifeform, a sentient ocean that can probe our minds in order to communicate with us by looking to our pasts. Wether you accept it or not see it as pleasure or pain is another thing that only individuals can answer. Still a fascinating concept and this version is well shot with beautiful photography with images that never leave your brain and great performances all round. This shows that Russia could turn out quality cinema and its a pity its not better known that it is in the world of sci-fi cinema. Stanislaw Lem never liked any of the versions of his novel but thats authors for you, for me that only one view the public decides otherwise what resonates with them and rightly so.
Great movie not a single overdone Hollywood effects. Concentrates on meaning. 👍👌
ФИЛЬМ -ШЕДЕВР И ОСТАНЕТСЯ ТАКИМ НАВСЕГДА!
🥰
Я в шоке! Где меня уронили? Где не дали дышать кислородом? Где, бл, шедевр? В чём?
Если "Ханума" Товстоногого шедевр - это шедевр! Если "Они сражались за Родину" Бондарчука шедевр - это шедевр! Если "Тихий Дон" Герасимова шедевр - это шедевр!
Что здесь шедеврального?
Имя Тарковского, а за именем пустота?
Ору!
с первых кадров и до последнего это шедевр ❤
@@Qvinta7с вашей колокольни вид просто не тот.. фильмы Тарковского это прекрасные произведения искусства в первую очередь.
No olviden que Kubrick y Tarkowsky eran rusos y Rusia una de las naciones con más talento artístico en todos los terrenos:música, pintura, poesia, novela, cine, escultura.. Este legado, esta herencia para el mundo, para la civilización es incuetionable.
Gracias
I totally agree Juan. Thanks for your post.
yep but now the word associates Russians with war crimes, military incompetence, authoritarianism, and alcoholism. It sucks because there is so much more to the place than these negative things.
Kubrick NO era ruso
@@Lobatomic Not Russian at all. Kubrick was polish, Romanian, Austrian, and Jewish. Even if Kubrick was full blooded Russian he was raised in the Bronx. He was American raised in the mixing pot environment of New York.
Kubrick wasn't russian, but otherwise you're correct.
Pure film making genius !!! I showed this film to Marsia Lucas , she thought it was incredible .
Great movie of its time! Electronic music and sound effects! And the phrase that "shame might be the only thing needed to save mankind" is the epitome of conciousness that seperates humans from animals.
I have seen this legendary movie many times and will see it many more. So so special…… thank you for sharing this classic !!!
The whole run down space station ... is a masterpiece in design ...
one can watch this movie dozens of times and appreciate nuances
The whole thing smacks of cheapness, with all that tin and tinfoil. 'SOVIET' is written all over it.
And let's not even mention that art gallery-cum-library thing with floating candles on a space station.
You smack of cheapness lameness@@offbeat65
@@offbeat65 production design was just means, and not the goal, as it is today. It's just there for you to understand where you are - it serves no purpose for the meaning of the film.
True No?
I realy Love the Details about culture
The Statues the Peruan mask
The old guns
Like the Bring Something to remind Them of humanity
See the Film today the First time
I read Lem a Lot in my childhood/youth now 25 years Later i discover that Art of a move
Loved it
My all time favourite movie! A heartbreaking masterpiece by the greatest film director ever. Also the eeriest, spookiest psychological drama I've ever seen. Beautifully photographed and posted in similarly wonderful quality, with lovely, new, well-readable subtitles. Thank you Mosfilm!👍♥️
Csodás, szerintem is. A könyv egy kicsit unalmas volt nekem. A Kyberiáda a kedvenc Lev könyvem :)
this is horror? damn i cant watch this then
@@mayoofm6049 no, its fine. there is no jumpscare or anything like that, trust me im a scaredy cat as well and even i manage to finish this film. please watch it, it wont disappoint you or waste your time.
@@goprodog4304 йион тихий форевер!😊
@@mayoofm6049 it is very subtle, you will only put the truly scary stuff together after the movie, although there is forshadowing
Cinematography is just stunning and a wonderful soundtrack
Some twenty years ago a friend told me Solaris was his favorite sci-fi movie and now when we are on the brink of a new era I finally watched this film. I have trained myself to look for simulareties and parallels with the current agenda's of the current power mongering ruling classes when I watch a sci fi movie.
But Solaris is a league of its own. Great movie.
Solaris means Ra, Anubis...
This man, was King of Greece. It's a parody. He is the father of the future president of the world, UNOM, Niklaus. He's living in England. This movie it's a revelation. Tarkovsky works real hard in this project, trying to exposed this man. It's not just another feary tale.
@@ALMATURYAH-t6i who is it?
thank you for keeping these classics up despite everything going on in the world
The original film. The best telling of the story. I'm going to that ocean.
I still remember watching the film for the first time. It started at 1.00 AM, and I had a train to catch at 6 AM! But I was entranced. Tarkovsky was really THE poet of the cinema.
In a conversation between Martin Scorsese and Krystoff Zanussi, the former said to the polish master that many people in the West think that in socialists countries was scarce artistic freedom, but that he was completly sure that films like "Ivan´s Chilhood", "Andrei Rubliov", or this one would have never been possible in Hollywood: symply NEVER. And Zanussi agreed.
Let's dismantle this commie shit: Tarkovski was constantly censored and persecuted for his spiritual themes in his movies and criticism of the soviet union, to the point he fled to Italy after finishing STALKER, Come and See was delayed 8 years due to censorship, The Colour Of Pomegranates's director was under KGB watch and constantly had trouble with the law, Aleksei German, same story.
As for Hollywood, they were receiving funding from the Russians according to declassified KGB documents. And even in the current day, they persecute ideological dissidents like Gina Carano or Kevin Sorbo.
Let's be frank, each and every artistic achievement in film was made in spite of the Soviet & Hollywood systems.
@@ThePolistiren Excuse me: who exactly is spreading "communist shit": Martin Scorsese, Kristoff Zanussi or me? The reference came from an interview, in english language , made to Zanussi himself available on UA-cam. What you say does not deny the very point made by them. Of course there was censorship in the USSR, and remains in Russia today. So? Tarkovsky did make about 6 films in his motherland that could hardly had been made in Hollywood. A fact. In the USA the situation was not very different: just check Dalton Trumbo´s or Joseph Losey´s cases (among other victims of MCarthyism) and, more recently, the testimonies from Andrei Konchalovsky, who went back to Russia to continue his career after finding out that in Hollywood creativity freedom for film makers is even worse than in Russia.
@@ThePolistiren
even Georges Lucas calls bullshit on your crap opinion. Yes the Soviet Union was oppressive ans autocratic and censored a lot beyond criticizing the state and atheism Soviet film makers could make whatever art house film they wanted as opposed to the West where you're obligated to make blockbuster films that adhere to a set of criteria aimed only to generate revenue, else you won't get funded.
@@ThePolistiren Yep! Someone had to put that clear.
@@ThePolistiren that doesn't change the statement such movies did never and will never come from Hollywood
I've seen this movie twice, but it was in the mid-1970s. The first time was the three and a half hour version; second was "only" two and a half. My friends and I loved it both times. The cloud scenes in the long version were often a couple of minutes of pure white screen. We marveled that anyone in management would allow that.
The first time I saw it was a year ago on TMC. While watching this post I noticed that scenes were cut. I didn’t realize there was a short and long cut of the movie.
首都高はどーでしたか
起きてもまだ同じシーンでしたよ
Thank you, Mosfilm, for providing all this excellent content to us!!!
It's called socialism
I've seen this movie many times over many years, and I find something new every time. I've read the book before I saw it first time; I was young and foolish, and was a bit disappointed by the deviation from Lem's story initially, but appreciated it more and more every time I rewatched. It makes my eyes wet now. Amazing cinematography, story telling, acting. A true masterpiece.
Muchas gracias por subir esta película. Amo Rusia y su gran cultura. Mucho ánimo.
Mosfilm
the main role is played by a Lithuanian - Donatas Banionis
el papel principal lo desempeña un lituano: Donatas Banionis

Every scene is mesmerizing, ive never seen anything like it
МОЖНО ПОСТАВИТЬ ВАМ 25 ТЫСЯЧ ЛАЙКОВ?????!
One of the greatest films ever made.
Truly the scene of which Chris is placed with the young version of his mother has such an unreal depth of his placement in the present, visiting the past, in his future form. Absolutely brilliant work.
Second viewing for me. I needed all the subtitles to fill so many gaps. One of my favorite films of all time. I still need to explain to myself what exactly it means. What a performance by Natalya Bondarchuk!
Update. I'm reading Lem's book! The guy who played Snow evidently did a good job too. The book is just fantastic and it's filling in my gaps. I suspect Lem had scientific training; I'll guess . . biology. What an imagination Lem had. Btw, I betcha this was inspired by the work of French zoologist/philosopher Pierre Teilhard de Chardin.
Update:- this movie is boring afffffffff ughh how can anyone like this movie
@@beepbeep_mooTsk tsk . . eez too bad . .
@@beepbeep_moo I was hoping I would like this as it came so highly recommended, but I sadly have to agree with your assessment. It's long, and slow paced and very poorly explained. Does a movie this long need a five minute sequence that just shows a car driving somewhere??? 😂
@@Statsy10 Republican Party presidential debates are way more entertaining
Kubrick and Tarkovsky my two all time favorite masters
Have watched many many times. One of my best loved sci-fi movies. I have all films of Andrei Tharkovsky in my collection.
Какой гениальный Андрей Тарковский. Оставил нам свой шедевр. Смотрю не знаю в какой раз. И поражаюсь опять. Какие краски, какая музыка. Как он показал красоту нашей планеты Земля. Обратила внимание на детали. Главный герой вначале фильма взьерошенный какой то, имею в виду прическу. Я думала так ходили. И в конце фильма аккуратно причесан. Значит это специально. Крис просто что то понял пройдя через все испытания и успокоился в душе.
Thank you for uploading this historic Sci-Fi film that has been reputed by experts to be the most philosophic of this kind. I'd like to add: iconic, pious and much much more ...
I love this version. My VHS version finally died years ago. Good to see it again!
My favourite Tarkovsky film. Excellently achieved.
Read several Lem books back when Britain still imported and translated books from places other than Japan or Scandinavia.
Often wondered whether the plot was about people on the inside looking out a greater world / universe and barely beginning to understand before being changed and perhaps destroyed by something unknowable outside their experience.
Like being inside one political structure that governs everything, but not what is outside itself.
Such as reality, people and their deepest needs.
This film, like the book, is very Lovecraftian.
Much better than the other Solaris film.
Solaris, is a scientific mystery and thriller, a psychological mystery and thriller and a thriller about first contact.
This film is very much closer to the book.
Well done!
I have only watched the Clooney version and found the premise very intriguing. It is a story-driven play, not needing fantastic cgi/special effects to be compelling.
I see nothing Lovecraftian about Solaris, & I've enjoyed the Soderbergh version very much.
@@proto-geek248 The dread that the Universe is in itself unknowable, that is also the essence of the cosmic horror of Lovecraft.
@@ciprianlica That's a stretch.
Какое послевкусие от фильма!!!Шедевр, и не меньше.
I love this movie as much as I loved Dostoyevsky's Crime and Punishment, from Bangladesh
Thank you very much. So glad to have an opportunity to reconnect with this film. Absolutely excellent. Kudos
One of the few movies in human history which is simply perfect. A timeless work of art. Another one would be 2001: A Space Odyssey.
I definitely agree with you. But, apparently, Tarkovsky loathed 2001: A Space Odyssey, which I find very surprising given the fact that both directors were superb artists of the highest caliber.
@@ryokan9120 I disagree with Tarkovsky on his opinion of 200: ASO. He said he didn't see the humanity in it. Too much was given over to technology. But that was necessary to establish the setting of the story. Nor do I think humanity is missing from it. The characters, especially Floyd, his daughter, the Russians, observers who accompany him to the Monolith, and most of all Bowman, show a lot of human feeling, or they fight against it at appropriate times given their situations.
@@dondragmer2412 Yes, I completely agree with you. It makes me wonder if Tarkovsky suffered from jealousy or envy towards 2001? Tarkovsky was an artistic genius and surely he would have recognized the artistic genius of Kubrick?
Excuse me. 2001: ASO.
@@dondragmer2412 Yes!
This is my most favorite movie of all time. I have it in a DVD. Also his other movie Stalker
Hii , mine also ,both movies are all time favourite, which DVD do you have ? Pl answer
Congrats, bro..!
The BEST movies by far, all the time.
Kind regards..!
Same with me, Bro! I can't help it, I just love it!👍♥️
The first appearance of Kris' wife, with that spooky music, is one of the most charged scenes in cinema history. Totally mindblowing.
Agreed. It gives me goosebumps every time I see it.
when you actually realize there is more than 0% chance that both Snaut and Sartorius are copies created by Guiderian(while he was still alive and who killed himself because he could not stand it) and that kelvin actually is the only human on the station, all conversations hit entirely different ...
@@seushimarejikaze1337 Interesting idea. But didn't the report Kelvin receives before taking off mention all three of them?
@@exoplanet11 but how would people making the report recognize copies from real things?
@@seushimarejikaze1337 for that matter, how do any of us? Theseus' Ship.
What an incredibly beautiful work of SF. The approach to sound was so unique, the silences powerful. Such a fascinating life form. 🌊
Thanks ... Always loved this movie ... One of Tarkovsky's best, even though Lem didn't like it very much. Anyway, it's wonderful to share this with everyone...
I was young and working for a Russian guy that used to own a couple of movie theaters, Artkino Pictures, was the name of his company and Cosmos 70 the name of one of the theaters.
I used to do the inventory of the movies in a basement, I remember this movie in particular because of the promo posters and pictures and I used to take reels of film and took this movie's reel as well in 35 mm from one movie theater to the other one, back in the 70's 🎥...
I watched this after losing my wife to cancer & had moved on to another relationship, which made the experience extremely harrowing for me, as in imagining myself how I would react in those circumstances. Brilliant anyhow & as in his Mirror & Lars von Trier's Melancholia, Breughal's Hunters in the Snow was an extra.
Brilliant film, to me hypnotic and once I start watching I cannot stop, I have the dvd which I watch every few years. Subscribed.
Mnogo puta gledam ovaj film i uvek nalazim nove detalje.Smatram da je film genijalan.
Tarkovsky is GREAT.....my most beloved -among his masterpiece movies- is ''NOSTALGHIA'' and ''THYSIA''
I know about Tarkovski, but it's been years since I watched any of his films. I can see his influence everywhere. I'm constantly thinking to myself as I watch, 'seen Friedkin use that..seen PT Anderson use that...'
Najlepsza zekranizowana wersja powieści Lema !!!!!!!!!!!
Tak.
Лему не понравилось. Он даже поссорился с Тарковским.
Genius film! I love Tarkovsky and Russian cinema and culture in general. So many incredible filmmakers, writers and poets!
Is this real? Wow! I can't believe you're sharing this great film with English subtitles! Thank you so much! 💞♥️🥰
Socialism
The Restoration of this film is just wonderful. I've got an old copy of this film on DVD but this one looks much much better than my copy. I think it is very important to see Classic Films in the best quality possible. Could it be possible to have Eisenstein / Ivan The Terrible First and Second Part with this great quality? Thanks so much for uploading these great films and Greetings from Spain.
One of my favorites movies. Love it. Deep meditation on the morality and ethics of metaphysics and philosophy. Very existentialist in its themes and atmosphere. I think it’s superior to 2001 A Space Odyssey.
Hurrahhh… for Mosfilm with this masterpiece 🎬📽👍
A masterpiece. As amazing as Stalker or The Mirror. Tarkovsly is a genious. A million thanks for this high quality post
Thank you for posting this film. I needed it. Maybe one of the best films i'v ever seen. The acting was wonderful. What a performance by the exquisitely beautiful Natalia Bonderchuck. The film left me with all kinds of emotions. Very absorbing. Wish i had a copy to keep. Thanks again.
This is socialism
Utterly fantastic movie- thanks for upload
This was Tarkovsky's answer to 2001, which is really( despite its visual brilliance) a cold, mechanical
look at technology in the future with the computer showing the most human qualities: Solaris was warm,
full blooded, full of humanity, the beauty of the Earth and art, anchored more in reality.
One of the best films ever...
A masterpiece from one of the greatest directors. Far superior to the American remake
Soderbergh's version isn't a remake. It's just another adaptation of the novel.
Nonsens.