The bahco took you 64 strokes. The silky took 34. I just love your demonstrations. You cover everything and explain it perfectly 👍. Thanks for all the tips and tricks you show us. Keep em coming
"But you gotta rake out a lot more material". At age 79, I am ashamed to admit that the logic of this reasoning never occurred to me. Thank you, Blackie, for educating an old man. I would love to have a saw that incorporates the best features of both saws, especially the push/pull cut (but I may be wrong about that). BTW, the Bahco required ~60 strokes, the Silky ~30.
@@BLACKIETHOMAS , I am also going on 80 and I counted the strokes, also. LOL Different number but still a 2:1 ration in favor of the Silky. I own a Bacho... but will have to buy a Silky now. ROFL
I advise THE Silkey Ultra Accel recurve for soft and fresh wood!! And THE Silkey Ultra Accel Taiko For hard and dead wood!! I swear by them!! I got 2 of them each!! So 4 in total. 2 are new for backup or trade items!! They are worth their weight in gold!!! No Bacco for me!! You are doing a great job!! Keep it up!! Greetings from the Netherlands!!!
Well done sir. I concur fully. I learned this lesson the hard way. Broke my first Silky within the first few minutes. That was 2 years ago, haven't broke one since.
Great review. Both work very well. Each has pros and cons and I see folks do great things with both. For me the difference is - I dont lend silky to the new guy - thats how they get bent or broken.
I got a Bahco earlier this year, and I love it. But have been seeing others using the Silky and wondering how they went head to head before I bought it. I'm glad I found this video. Buying the Silky now.
I own both makes of saws and love both equally. I like the fact that the blade can be locked on the bahco and if someone want to borrow a saw I would lend them the bahco because it is indestructible and anyone can saw using it but a lot of people end up breaking the silky blades. I have 3 silky, Pocketboy, F180 and a 270mm long Oyakota. I have one for every occasion. Oh the little hole you ask about is a thumb knick to help you open the blade out. Great video. Kind regards.
I own both as well, but if I had to pick only one to get through a survival situation, I’d take the Bahco Laplander. Why? It’s more durable, which means more reliable. It’s not always about speed and effort guys. -Stephen, Ohio 🇺🇸
Less effort equals less calories. I get your point but in a "survival situation" you have to also conserve energy. If the person is not familiar with there "survival gear" they are already setting themselves up for failure. The silky should hold up fine provided the user is mindful of it's ability and disability. The sad fact about survival is folks usually don't have any of the gear with them when they need it most.
Bahco for long term bug out = Gorilla proof slow but sure. Silky week ends as faster but can break easier and that's ok for a weekend the silky is less forgiving and in a survival situation / cold / injured / ..... Mistakes can happen and the Bahco is some what more forgiving. In the end both are great tools for the Correct task / conditions. There is no right or wrong here just have both and enjoy the outdoors. How I see it with 60+ years experience. Your mileage may vary.
Less effort, less calories. If you don’t abuse your silky, or use it incorrectly, it’s no less durable than the Bacho. The problem with Silky saws comes from people trying to saw too aggressive and too fast, like they were sawing with a Bacho. Just watch Nutinfancy’s Silky saw video. He shows how stupidly sawing over aggressively with a silky will result in a broken saw tip. The silky saws so efficiently that there is no need in being aggressive and burning more calories. That’s why it’s a much better bushcraft, survival, and long distance travel saw than the Bacho.
Excellent point regarding the pull saws, if one knows how to use them right very little effort is needed because the tendons do most of the work, push saws require muscle to stabilize the structure and move the saw forward.
Got me a silky months ago. Tbh I never really thought about push/pull cutting when using a hand saw,as I've ALWAYS coasted pushing and RIPPING on the backstroke,it just always felt natural. Full disclosure learned how to do that from Gramps as a kid helping him cut wood for the fireplace and his woodburning stove. Great stuff as usual Blackie
I have owned both and they are both good. But for my money I would go with a Corona brand saw. Little over $20 and I believe it out preforms either of those.
I think the Bahco holds its own on smaller branches. Branches just bigger than what you'd break by hand, which is what small wood stoves take. More aggressive saws start to get erratic as diameter goes down, and as diameter goes way up, a folding bow saw will trounce both of these.
Thanks Blackie. Another great video! I have a Silky and do a fair amount of pruning with it. Very roughly speaking, I measured 30 seconds and about 60 strokes with the Bacho and 15 seconds and 35 strokes for the Silky. Far from scientific, but the Silky seems faster with the aggressive teeth
Found that the dual position has an effect on Flat 2x4 type lumber, square stakes, posts etc. Silky Saw in position 1 for round forest timber, however change to position 2 for flat, type wood products. Position 2 permits a less aggressive biting action and allows smooth gliding over a flat board of wood, and it cuts amazingly. Position 1 is steep and grabs the flat timbers to much, preventing a rythmic pull power stroke. Give it a whirl and see. Cheers!
I own both saws and I agree with ya....I like the Silky better. I own the Gomboy 240 and it has more momentum with the pull and longer reach. My Bahco I keep in my vehicle emergency kit as a back up and the Silky is in my bug out bag! I also recommend the Corona Razor Tooth saw. It's another fav folding blade used by outdoorsmen. Awesome video bro 😃
Great video. Thanks for sharing. I appreciate all the YT content providers sharing what they know. I know lots of things and share them one on one with anyone whose shows an interest, but I don't take the time to make videos, so I give props to those of you who do. I think that hole in the blade is like the nail nick in a pocket knife's blade. I think you'll find that, when you tighten up the blade screw enough to ensure the blade stays closed, if its cold enough for gloves, that little slot provides just enough friction to keep your gloved fingers from sliding off the blade when you try to open the saw. You mentioned the availability of a second type blade for the Bahco, so since you didn't do the same for the Silky, I assume you may not be aware that most of their saws have more that one tooth pitch available for them also. They have even been praised for their ability to do rip cuts with the more aggressive pitch for each saw. The spare blade also fits the screw slot, so it makes for a tool free swap in the field, if you carry both with you.
I'm so glad I found your channel. I've been debating on which of these to buy and no one had a real comparison that I'd seen. Glad to hear the comparison! Everything I'd read seemed to put them close, but I couldn't see the difference very much in a single comparison video lol.
Awesome video as always. I recently bought a SOG folding saw that didn’t last long before the blade broke a couple of inches from the tip. That’s $35 wasted. The blade was thin, but it cut on the push and pull stroke so it ate thru wood well. But since it broke, I went back to my cheap Walmart version saw I got from my work. It works ok, but I may be getting a Bacho soon. Stay safe and be well. Thanks for sharing.
$35 is what I got my silky for off Amazon and it still works great. I also have a bacho for my wife and after using both I can honestly say, "do yourself a favor and do less work by using the silky"
Look closely at the video. The Bacho, that cuts on the push and pull, took almost twice as many strokes to cut through the log as the Silky did only cutting on the pull. Just because it cuts on the push and pull doesn’t mean it’s better.
HEY THIS IS BLACKIE..THANKS FOR WATCHING MY VIDEO..THESE ARE BOTH GREAT SAW TO CARRY IN A HAVERSACK..FOLLOW ALONG AS I GIVE MY THOUGHTS ON WHICH SAW IS THE BEST
I think you make an great point. They are both good saws.... I have not owned a Silky, I do have a Bako that I have yet to have the opportunity to use... I also have a Gerber Hunters saw that has a wood blade and bone blade.... I have used the heck out of that cause its on my hunting belt. Its a little smaller than the Bako but defiantly works well. I honestly feel the biggest difference between the two saws described is experience.... I feel a Bako would be more friendly to a novias bush crafter verses the silky. But then again that depends on experience with tools ect.... Most of all Great video. Thanks for your time.
I love the Silky saws. I can cut a ton of wood and not get tired. I've never heard of or tried the other ones. The Bahco since it has a thicker blade it means it's moving more wood. Meaning more work.
Great review! I have both and still use both however I also prefer the Silky, I have the Silky 650 as well and as you have said it will cut through a 6" piece of wood and larger pretty quick. You may have mention this and and I probably missed it but the Silky blades have a slight taper from blade to spine and I believe this is to reduce binding of the blade. I wasn't sure of this on the COMBOY so I had to check, and it is thiner at spine. Again... Great video! I have gained a lot of info from watching your videos!
I agree with you for the most part, I love them both and in the short run, Silky is a bit better. The only thing is and you'll have the same experience I'm sure, over a couple of years time the Silky will not be as sharp yet the Bacho will still be impressively sharp. I've had my Bachco for 3 years now and my Silky for 2 years and my Bacho is impressively sharper than my Silky is, in fact my Silky really needs a new blade. Now you shocked me when you said that you had to put a 90° spine on your Bacho? Mine came with a perfect 90° spine straight out of the package, I have demonstrated that it throws awesome sparks a couple of times in my videos. I've never had to do anything to mine either, it still has a perfect 90° spine on it. Nevertheless, awesome video and I appreciate your upfront, non biased, and honest review between the two. Like I said, I own and love them both. Take care and stay awesome my brother 🙂
In the country where Bachos are made they are a hunter camping saw as the teeth have a special set to them so they cut bone very well where poor old silky cant I own both and love them both
I have both and carry both. Both have their pro and cons. One pro with the Bacho is you can sharpen the blade if you had to in the field with a triangle file. The Silky you will have to replace the blade... when it dulls which will be a long time.
Bahco is n't only a wood saw.it's a saw designed to cut other materials too, like bones, plastic etc. It's blade is tempered with toughness in mind, so it can never fail (break) It's a soldiers, or hunters saw, that can perfectly be the best saw, for a survival situation, because of it's versatily and it's toughness. Silky saws, are the opposite, they are wood saws, that are not designed to have tough blades, but hard and sharp ones. That's why they cut wood faster. Now, what's better or not, since we compare different tools, that are designed for different purposes, that leads to what's your needs. You want a wood saw? Silky is what you should choose. For hunters, prepers, survival etc... Bahco is the best choice out there. Other good quality wood saws, that worth mentioning, are the Opinel No12 and the Corona saws. Hope, this helps.
I noticed my Bahco had difficulty striking my ferro rod. I guess the Silky Saw is better if you aren't doing a speed test. Being old, I will always use the slow and steady methodology (plus is uses less energy). Great video.
The first pull pruning saws I used was back in 1977 when I worked in an orchard. In the Winter and early Spring we pruned apple trees. I just reversed the blades. There are a few smallish specialty bow saws for pruning that much forward, but they don't cut in a tangle of branches. In 2005-2007, I pruned trees in my neighbor's orchard I also had few jobs on the side a few years earlier. the American made folding saws were garbage. In the orchard the owner got a few Bahco's and they were OK. When working as a forestry technician for a city, I got tired of trashy saws so I bought a Silky for myself, showed it to the crew boss and Forester. one day. They replaced the crews saws! Silky Pocket Boy also has a finer blade that can be used in finer bushcraft and craftwork. Eventually I picked up a Silky Big Boy that is used for much of the pruning I do around here, it also is used to fell moderate sized trees without a chainsaw. A few times it was used to release a stuck chainsaw. Keep one on the tool belt of tool bucket when out in the woods. Enjoy.
Retired carpenter. I have a folding reciprocating saw that takes all kinds of blades from metal to crosscut to 12'' pruning blades. Three position handle, smaller than the other two, very compact. I have Silky and Bahco but my reciprocating saw beats them both by a long shot. Been using it for 25+ years. I carry a variety of blades in my bugout bag so I can cut locks or wood etc no problem and lots of easy to find disposable blades.
@@asmith7876 Sorry, it's just a handle like the silky or Bahco that takes reciprocating saw blades. It folds up the same way. LENOX TRI-FOLD® SAW FOLDING JAB
Remember to not press down on the Silky on the forward stroke. Time yourself on a 5 inch or so log , but do not press down on the forward stroke . In a days time the cut on the pull saws will do a good 30 % more than the other ones, and at the end of the cutting you will have saved much more energy.
Most guys can probably do pushups, but not many can do 100 pound curls in each arm. Either way, cutting on the pull is better because the action keeps the blade and cut straight while cutting on the push can buckle the blade and throw off the angle of the cut. Cheers.
Never snapped a bahco blade, snapped three silkies. Both are great I think it also depends on the wood you are cutting, your knowledge on said wood and the blades you are using. I prefer the robustness of the bahco to be honest.
Imo the bahco is best for beginners or survival as its practically indestructible, the silky cuts faster and smoother but takes proper technique or will certainly break lol. I think the hole in the silky blade just serves as a kind of nail nick to easily open with gloves on, id be interested to know for sure tho lol.
Hello! I notice that you use the Japanese domestic version of the Gomboy. The export version has the words Professional on them and has a much thicker blade!
Both are excellent saws I believe .. each with their specific pros and cons and fan base. Me .. I've got a cheap little Felco (a Pull Saw) .. bought at my local 'Bau Centre' in the Garden Section. It does what it has to do .. and if necessary, spare blades are just down the road. Pull Saws .. I believe that Japanese Carpenters favour Pull Saws in that they also give a 'more accurate / precise cut'. A good review .. thanks.
If the tool cuts on the pull stroke, it can be made of thinner metal. A thin blade has to cut and displace less material to make a kerf. It will cut with less work. A thinner blade is more apt to break when it occasionally binds on a push stroke. If you use good technique, never get fatigued, never get cold hands, and never make mistakes with your sawing motion, the thin blade works great. A bow saw is much, much less likely to bend or break, even with a thin blade. So, as a tool, the thin-bladed pull saw works best. A thicker-bladed folding saw is more work, but is less likely to fail catastrophically, while way out in the boonies. So it's the better folding saw for survival. A bow saw is tougher than either. Its blades are cheaper, and are light weight, which allows easier carrying of a spare blade. Either you fabricate the frame in the field, or a complete bow saw is a lot to carry. It requires a pack. It's not for belt or pocket carry. My attitude is: take a saw with you that can at least cut a 4" limb. If you're gonna be way out in the boonies, don't carry one thin-bladed saw as your only saw.
An excellent informative discussion & if I hadn't just bought a BAHCO I'd be ordering the Silky right now. After limited use, I'm unimpressed with the BAHCO. Between sale price & bank card promotion, I've only got a few buck$ invested in the BACHO Laplander, but I guess I'll pay market price for the Gomboy & like you, save the BAHCO for the bug out bag.
I own both. Use both. For durability & comfort, I'll take the Laplander. However In terms of calories expended per cut, the Silky is a much better option, but it isn't as durable as the Laplander and the blade isn't as tough.
Had a cheaper folding saw before the Bahco. It warped with the heat being produced when I was cutting up a fair bit of hard wood. The Bahco has never done that. It's very reliable, a tried and tested bit of kit. I'm sticking with the Bahco.
Nice Work Blackie! now regarding the pull cutting stroke, I think there are 2 more reasons behind it. All Japanese wood working tools are pull cutting, and that I think has also got to do with the fact that drawing enhances accuracy of motion. And for being a pruning saw, let's not forget that branches to be cut are ABOVE the user mostly. So a pull stroke is both intuitive And necessary.
I've been comparing these two hand saws for a few weeks now myself and it's turned out to be a tough choice for me. My mind was made-up until just a few minutes ago when I started watching this year old video that popped-up in my feed suggestions. I was definitely going with the Bahco, I come to that decision because it cuts both ways, so I figured heck can't go wrong there. I even argued with someone on another video about it. I was like how can a saw that only cuts one way be better than a saw that cuts two ways:) HA! Guess I should just do like you and get'em both:) Back to the drawing board I guess, good review Blackie...
'Lenox trifold folding saw handle' takes all reciprocating saw blades. Its similar to silky or Bahco saw handle but takes all kinds of blades. Disposable blades, easy to find in any hardware store. Blades can be bent to cut into tight areas and bent back. Other companies make similar folding saw handles
I have the Silky SuperAccel21. It has an aluminum handle instead of the steel handle of the Gomboy. Mine has the large teeth, but a fine tooth blade is available.
You could use bank line or small cordage in a loop with a cord lock through the mid blade hole on the Silky to hold blade closed. After removing, use it as wrist lanyard. Cheers
I have no idea what the hole in the blade is for. Just saw replacement blades for The Silky Super Accel on eBay that does not have a hole. Also saw a complete saw for sale on Wesspur that did not have a hole in the blade. My Super Accel does have the hole in the blade.
Bahco for long term bug out = Gorilla proof slow but sure. Silky week ends as faster but can break easier and that's ok for a weekend the silky is less forgiving and in a survival situation / cold / injured / ..... Mistakes can happen and the Bahco is some what more forgiving. In the end both are great tools for the Correct task / conditions. There is no right or wrong here just have both and enjoy the outdoors. How I see it with 60+ years experience. Your mileage may vary.
I got a hammock it's got a netting for mosquitoes and bugs that's hooked on permanently zipper to where I can get out of it but it takes two lines to put it dang it right can I use those two lines as a Ridgeline
Bahco have teeth for dry wood, bone,... Silky have teeth for pruning... So two different teeth... Bahco have 396 JT BLADE and cut like Silky becouse they both have teeth for pruning and compare Silky and Bahco 396 JT BLADE, now that would be fair test. Best regards
try cutting fat wood with both and tell me which one you like best. We have had the silky plug and stop cutting. Bahco keeps on going. Just my personal observations.
silky cuts a lot better but the bacho is a lot harder to misuse and break. broken saws dont cut, the bacho you can just bend back into place is you bend it. that being said ive got 2 silkys and prefer them over the bacho. if i were to gift someone a saw who doesnt have one it will 100% always be the bacho because its more reliable in a beginners hands
I'll say it again, the only way a Silky blade is broken is through USER ERROR. Is it easy to do? Yes it is, but YOU broke it, the saw didn't break. It isn't a design flaw, or a defect. YOU broke it. All these people blaming the tool are simply not using it right. Don't buy or use a tool unless you use it correctly, goes for any tool. I've used Sandvik Laplanders (pre-Bahco) for decades before finding Silkys. There is NO comparison. (Edit) I think the hole is simply a notch to help open the blade.
The fact that many American's think that sawing is on the push stroke just means they have forgotten how to use a hand saw. It has always been a greenhorn problem not to know what kind of saw they are using and trying to power through the process. You could find the same number who do not know how to properly use a hammer or an ax.
Nothing you said is not true. On the other hand nobody is forcing you to put pressure on the push stroke using the Bahco. Of course if you don't this will make it slower but it will stay in one piece. On the other hand if you do make the mistake to put pressure on the push stroke with the Silky it's very likely to snap. Silky even warns about this and you see many videos where this happened even with very experienced people. Sure they are both pruning saws. You can get different blades for different types of wood for the Silky so that's a pruning advantage as long as you have these other blades or can order them online. The Bahco Laplander will even cut bone. Now this extended part on the Silky you use for striking your ferro rod will also rub through your pack or haversack in time. The Bahco Laplander has an all smooth rounded housing and won't rub through fabric in a hurry. It's also locked in the closed position. So even though they are basically the same size and could be considered pruning size saws there's a whole different mindset behind the two saws. To compare them one on one is like comparing a filet knife with a thick saber grind all purpose knife. But your conclusion is right. Going out in the garden get the right Silky with the right blade, order some spare blades online. Throwing in your pack get the Bahco and call it a day.
So when you pull something you use both your biceps and your back muscles, but when you do a pushing action, you use only your triceps? No pectoral muscles? Hmm. Have you ever noticed that doing push ups is somewhat easier than doing pull ups? Someone who cannot execute a single pull up might be able to do a couple of push ups, and a fit person who can do both will always do twice or thrice as much when going for max reps?
The explanation of the muscle groups was a little off course but once you've owned and learned how to use the cut on the pull only, saws they are superior . If you mess around and break the Silky you were using it improperly. I'm 71 and have just learned about these cut on the pull only saws in the last 5 or 6 years. It takes much less energy to operate the Silkys than it does any other especially if you saw a lot when camping.
Pushing requires triceps, pectorals, and inner deltoids; pulling requires biceps, rear deltoids, and the much larger latissimus muscles of the back. Though whether the muscles make a difference is arguable: it's probably largely about technique.
When you do pull ups it's the entire weight of your body . When doing pushups the lower half of your body weight is only partially lifted for example your feet aren't lifted hardly any !!!
The one that convinces and impresses an old man that was set in his ways must truly do something right. Love your videos, keep it up!
The bahco took you 64 strokes. The silky took 34. I just love your demonstrations. You cover everything and explain it perfectly 👍. Thanks for all the tips and tricks you show us. Keep em coming
I loved my Bahco for a long time, but once I started using the Silky there was no going back.
"But you gotta rake out a lot more material". At age 79, I am ashamed to admit that the logic of this reasoning never occurred to me. Thank you, Blackie, for educating an old man. I would love to have a saw that incorporates the best features of both saws, especially the push/pull cut (but I may be wrong about that). BTW, the Bahco required ~60 strokes, the Silky ~30.
lol thanks for counting
@@BLACKIETHOMAS , I am also going on 80 and I counted the strokes, also. LOL Different number but still a 2:1 ration in favor of the Silky. I own a Bacho... but will have to buy a Silky now. ROFL
Love my Silky saws, they are amazing! One of the best purchases I've ever made, no regrets. 👍
Great to hear!
I advise THE Silkey Ultra Accel recurve for soft and fresh wood!!
And THE Silkey Ultra Accel Taiko For hard and dead wood!!
I swear by them!! I got 2 of them each!! So 4 in total. 2 are new for backup or trade items!!
They are worth their weight in gold!!!
No Bacco for me!!
You are doing a great job!!
Keep it up!!
Greetings from the Netherlands!!!
Well done sir. I concur fully. I learned this lesson the hard way. Broke my first Silky within the first few minutes. That was 2 years ago, haven't broke one since.
Great review. Both work very well. Each has pros and cons and I see folks do great things with both.
For me the difference is - I dont lend silky to the new guy - thats how they get bent or broken.
wisdom !
Excellent video and a solid presentation of the strengths and weaknesses of each design.
I got a Bahco earlier this year, and I love it. But have been seeing others using the Silky and wondering how they went head to head before I bought it. I'm glad I found this video. Buying the Silky now.
I own both makes of saws and love both equally. I like the fact that the blade can be locked on the bahco and if someone want to borrow a saw I would lend them the bahco because it is indestructible and anyone can saw using it but a lot of people end up breaking the silky blades. I have 3 silky, Pocketboy, F180 and a 270mm long Oyakota. I have one for every occasion.
Oh the little hole you ask about is a thumb knick to help you open the blade out.
Great video. Kind regards.
I own both as well, but if I had to pick only one to get through a survival situation, I’d take the Bahco Laplander. Why? It’s more durable, which means more reliable. It’s not always about speed and effort guys. -Stephen, Ohio 🇺🇸
Less effort equals less calories. I get your point but in a "survival situation" you have to also conserve energy. If the person is not familiar with there "survival gear" they are already setting themselves up for failure. The silky should hold up fine provided the user is mindful of it's ability and disability. The sad fact about survival is folks usually don't have any of the gear with them when they need it most.
Bahco for long term bug out = Gorilla proof slow but sure. Silky week ends as faster but can break easier and that's ok for a weekend the silky is less forgiving and in a survival situation / cold / injured / ..... Mistakes can happen and the Bahco is some what more forgiving. In the end both are great tools for the Correct task / conditions. There is no right or wrong here just have both and enjoy the outdoors. How I see it with 60+ years experience. Your mileage may vary.
Less effort, less calories. If you don’t abuse your silky, or use it incorrectly, it’s no less durable than the Bacho. The problem with Silky saws comes from people trying to saw too aggressive and too fast, like they were sawing with a Bacho. Just watch Nutinfancy’s Silky saw video. He shows how stupidly sawing over aggressively with a silky will result in a broken saw tip. The silky saws so efficiently that there is no need in being aggressive and burning more calories. That’s why it’s a much better bushcraft, survival, and long distance travel saw than the Bacho.
Outback series
I fully agree. In a survival situation you will make mistakes so your gear has to be very reliable and forgiving.
Excellent point regarding the pull saws, if one knows how to use them right very little effort is needed because the tendons do most of the work, push saws require muscle to stabilize the structure and move the saw forward.
Got me a silky months ago.
Tbh I never really thought about push/pull cutting when using a hand saw,as I've ALWAYS coasted pushing and RIPPING on the backstroke,it just always felt natural.
Full disclosure learned how to do that from Gramps as a kid helping him cut wood for the fireplace and his woodburning stove.
Great stuff as usual Blackie
I have the new silky outback edition on order can't wait to get my hands on that bad boy
Me too, can't wait
Sir, you truly have a knack for teaching. Love the content!
I have owned both and they are both good. But for my money I would go with a Corona brand saw. Little over $20 and I believe it out preforms either of those.
I think the Bahco holds its own on smaller branches. Branches just bigger than what you'd break by hand, which is what small wood stoves take. More aggressive saws start to get erratic as diameter goes down, and as diameter goes way up, a folding bow saw will trounce both of these.
Thanks Blackie. Another great video! I have a Silky and do a fair amount of pruning with it. Very roughly speaking, I measured 30 seconds and about 60 strokes with the Bacho and 15 seconds and 35 strokes for the Silky. Far from scientific, but the Silky seems faster with the aggressive teeth
Bingo ,you nailed it !!!
Thanks for sharing!
Thanks for the video Blackie.
Any time!
Found that the dual position has an effect on Flat 2x4 type lumber, square stakes, posts etc. Silky Saw in position 1 for round forest timber, however change to position 2 for flat, type wood products. Position 2 permits a less aggressive biting action and allows smooth gliding over a flat board of wood, and it cuts amazingly. Position 1 is steep and grabs the flat timbers to much, preventing a rythmic pull power stroke. Give it a whirl and see. Cheers!
Blackie, I really like the way you tested both saw. Telling the pro and can on both saw. Thank Tim L.
Thanks 👍
Thanks Blackie. i just recently purchased my second Bahco...may need to invest in a silkie as well
Excellent review! You really touched on key points nobody else did in the other videos I watched.
I own both saws and I agree with ya....I like the Silky better. I own the Gomboy 240 and it has more momentum with the pull and longer reach. My Bahco I keep in my vehicle emergency kit as a back up and the Silky is in my bug out bag! I also recommend the Corona Razor Tooth saw. It's another fav folding blade used by outdoorsmen. Awesome video bro 😃
Thanks for sharing
Outstanding review
Great video. Thanks for sharing. I appreciate all the YT content providers sharing what they know. I know lots of things and share them one on one with anyone whose shows an interest, but I don't take the time to make videos, so I give props to those of you who do.
I think that hole in the blade is like the nail nick in a pocket knife's blade. I think you'll find that, when you tighten up the blade screw enough to ensure the blade stays closed, if its cold enough for gloves, that little slot provides just enough friction to keep your gloved fingers from sliding off the blade when you try to open the saw.
You mentioned the availability of a second type blade for the Bahco, so since you didn't do the same for the Silky, I assume you may not be aware that most of their saws have more that one tooth pitch available for them also. They have even been praised for their ability to do rip cuts with the more aggressive pitch for each saw. The spare blade also fits the screw slot, so it makes for a tool free swap in the field, if you carry both with you.
I'm so glad I found your channel. I've been debating on which of these to buy and no one had a real comparison that I'd seen. Glad to hear the comparison! Everything I'd read seemed to put them close, but I couldn't see the difference very much in a single comparison video lol.
Welcome aboard!
Nice explaining the differences, thanks.
Thank you the information Blackie being retired you must choose wisely I am going to get silky.
Awesome video as always. I recently bought a SOG folding saw that didn’t last long before the blade broke a couple of inches from the tip. That’s $35 wasted. The blade was thin, but it cut on the push and pull stroke so it ate thru wood well. But since it broke, I went back to my cheap Walmart version saw I got from my work. It works ok, but I may be getting a Bacho soon. Stay safe and be well. Thanks for sharing.
$35 is what I got my silky for off Amazon and it still works great. I also have a bacho for my wife and after using both I can honestly say, "do yourself a favor and do less work by using the silky"
@@johnthomasjr262 Ok. Thanks. I will
Look closely at the video. The Bacho, that cuts on the push and pull, took almost twice as many strokes to cut through the log as the Silky did only cutting on the pull. Just because it cuts on the push and pull doesn’t mean it’s better.
I chose Silky, too.
Which one is it I have a 180 silky and I love it
mine is the 210
HEY THIS IS BLACKIE..THANKS FOR WATCHING MY VIDEO..THESE ARE BOTH GREAT SAW TO CARRY IN A HAVERSACK..FOLLOW ALONG AS I GIVE MY THOUGHTS ON WHICH SAW IS THE BEST
i carry a gerber folding 8'' ? saw in my front pocket
I think you make an great point. They are both good saws.... I have not owned a Silky, I do have a Bako that I have yet to have the opportunity to use... I also have a Gerber Hunters saw that has a wood blade and bone blade.... I have used the heck out of that cause its on my hunting belt. Its a little smaller than the Bako but defiantly works well. I honestly feel the biggest difference between the two saws described is experience.... I feel a Bako would be more friendly to a novias bush crafter verses the silky. But then again that depends on experience with tools ect.... Most of all Great video. Thanks for your time.
I love the Silky saws. I can cut a ton of wood and not get tired. I've never heard of or tried the other ones. The Bahco since it has a thicker blade it means it's moving more wood. Meaning more work.
Great review! I have both and still use both however I also prefer the Silky, I have the Silky 650 as well and as you have said it will cut through a 6" piece of wood and larger pretty quick. You may have mention this and and I probably missed it but the Silky blades have a slight taper from blade to spine and I believe this is to reduce binding of the blade. I wasn't sure of this on the COMBOY so I had to check, and it is thiner at spine. Again... Great video! I have gained a lot of info from watching your videos!
Excellent explanation of the quality of these two saws. I have owned a couple of Bacos and the Silkys are far superior in my opinion.
I agree with you for the most part, I love them both and in the short run, Silky is a bit better. The only thing is and you'll have the same experience I'm sure, over a couple of years time the Silky will not be as sharp yet the Bacho will still be impressively sharp. I've had my Bachco for 3 years now and my Silky for 2 years and my Bacho is impressively sharper than my Silky is, in fact my Silky really needs a new blade. Now you shocked me when you said that you had to put a 90° spine on your Bacho? Mine came with a perfect 90° spine straight out of the package, I have demonstrated that it throws awesome sparks a couple of times in my videos. I've never had to do anything to mine either, it still has a perfect 90° spine on it. Nevertheless, awesome video and I appreciate your upfront, non biased, and honest review between the two. Like I said, I own and love them both.
Take care and stay awesome my brother 🙂
In the country where Bachos are made they are a hunter camping saw as the teeth have a special set to them so they cut bone very well where poor old silky cant I own both and love them both
I keep a wire saw just for bones and pvc pipe and use my silky saw to breeze through wood.
@brindle2009 That is good info. Thank you. Been using a Silky but I will add a Bacho to my hunting pack. Keeping the Silkys for camping.
I have both and carry both. Both have their pro and cons. One pro with the Bacho is you can sharpen the blade if you had to in the field with a triangle file. The Silky you will have to replace the blade... when it dulls which will be a long time.
Bahco is n't only a wood saw.it's a saw designed to cut other materials too, like bones, plastic etc. It's blade is tempered with toughness in mind, so it can never fail (break) It's a soldiers, or hunters saw, that can perfectly be the best saw, for a survival situation, because of it's versatily and it's toughness. Silky saws, are the opposite, they are wood saws, that are not designed to have tough blades, but hard and sharp ones. That's why they cut wood faster. Now, what's better or not, since we compare different tools, that are designed for different purposes, that leads to what's your needs. You want a wood saw? Silky is what you should choose. For hunters, prepers, survival etc... Bahco is the best choice out there. Other good quality wood saws, that worth mentioning, are the Opinel No12 and the Corona saws. Hope, this helps.
Thanks Blackie: very helpful!
I noticed my Bahco had difficulty striking my ferro rod. I guess the Silky Saw is better if you aren't doing a speed test. Being old, I will always use the slow and steady methodology (plus is uses less energy). Great video.
The first pull pruning saws I used was back in 1977 when I worked in an orchard. In the Winter and early Spring we pruned apple trees. I just reversed the blades. There are a few smallish specialty bow saws for pruning that much forward, but they don't cut in a tangle of branches. In 2005-2007, I pruned trees in my neighbor's orchard I also had few jobs on the side a few years earlier. the American made folding saws were garbage. In the orchard the owner got a few Bahco's and they were OK. When working as a forestry technician for a city, I got tired of trashy saws so I bought a Silky for myself, showed it to the crew boss and Forester. one day. They replaced the crews saws! Silky Pocket Boy also has a finer blade that can be used in finer bushcraft and craftwork. Eventually I picked up a Silky Big Boy that is used for much of the pruning I do around here, it also is used to fell moderate sized trees without a chainsaw. A few times it was used to release a stuck chainsaw. Keep one on the tool belt of tool bucket when out in the woods.
Enjoy.
Retired carpenter. I have a folding reciprocating saw that takes all kinds of blades from metal to crosscut to 12'' pruning blades. Three position handle, smaller than the other two, very compact. I have Silky and Bahco but my reciprocating saw beats them both by a long shot. Been using it for 25+ years. I carry a variety of blades in my bugout bag so I can cut locks or wood etc no problem and lots of easy to find disposable blades.
A folding Sawzall? This is a hand saw? A battery powered saw? I've never heard of such a saw, sounds intriguing!
@@asmith7876 Sorry, it's just a handle like the silky or Bahco that takes reciprocating saw blades. It folds up the same way. LENOX TRI-FOLD® SAW FOLDING JAB
Great video Blackie! I think I will at lone last give the silky a try. Thanks Blackie!
Remember to not press down on the Silky on the forward stroke. Time yourself on a 5 inch or so log , but do not press down on the forward stroke . In a days time the cut on the pull saws will do a good 30 % more than the other ones, and at the end of the cutting you will have saved much more energy.
@@garyminick1050 Thanks Gary.
Bahco is great for cutting roots while Silky is great for green woods.
Most guys can probably do pushups, but not many can do 100 pound curls in each arm. Either way, cutting on the pull is better because the action keeps the blade and cut straight while cutting on the push can buckle the blade and throw off the angle of the cut. Cheers.
Never snapped a bahco blade, snapped three silkies. Both are great I think it also depends on the wood you are cutting, your knowledge on said wood and the blades you are using.
I prefer the robustness of the bahco to be honest.
it has been my go to for a few yrs and i will be keeping mine..the silky for me has a advantage..but the bahco is still rock solid in my book
Great comparison. I do like the Japanese style of cut on pull ,and liked comments on possibility of deflection on pushing blade .
Thanks for watching!
Thanks for a fair review of both of these saws. - Tennessee Smoky
Thanks for watching!
Finally made up my mind the silky 210 is on it's way.
good choice
Imo the bahco is best for beginners or survival as its practically indestructible, the silky cuts faster and smoother but takes proper technique or will certainly break lol. I think the hole in the silky blade just serves as a kind of nail nick to easily open with gloves on, id be interested to know for sure tho lol.
good point
Hello! I notice that you use the Japanese domestic version of the Gomboy. The export version has the words Professional on them and has a much thicker blade!
Thanks for the info
Both are excellent saws I believe .. each with their specific pros and cons and fan base.
Me .. I've got a cheap little Felco (a Pull Saw) .. bought at my local 'Bau Centre' in the Garden Section. It does what it has to do .. and if necessary, spare blades are just down the road.
Pull Saws .. I believe that Japanese Carpenters favour Pull Saws in that they also give a 'more accurate / precise cut'.
A good review .. thanks.
Thanks for sharing!
If the tool cuts on the pull stroke, it can be made of thinner metal. A thin blade has to cut and displace less material to make a kerf. It will cut with less work. A thinner blade is more apt to break when it occasionally binds on a push stroke. If you use good technique, never get fatigued, never get cold hands, and never make mistakes with your sawing motion, the thin blade works great. A bow saw is much, much less likely to bend or break, even with a thin blade.
So, as a tool, the thin-bladed pull saw works best.
A thicker-bladed folding saw is more work, but is less likely to fail catastrophically, while way out in the boonies. So it's the better folding saw for survival.
A bow saw is tougher than either. Its blades are cheaper, and are light weight, which allows easier carrying of a spare blade. Either you fabricate the frame in the field, or a complete bow saw is a lot to carry. It requires a pack. It's not for belt or pocket carry.
My attitude is: take a saw with you that can at least cut a 4" limb. If you're gonna be way out in the boonies, don't carry one thin-bladed saw as your only saw.
An excellent informative discussion & if I hadn't just bought a BAHCO I'd be ordering the Silky right now. After limited use, I'm unimpressed with the BAHCO. Between sale price & bank card promotion, I've only got a few buck$ invested in the BACHO Laplander, but I guess I'll pay market price for the Gomboy & like you, save the BAHCO for the bug out bag.
hey trade blankets at gathering be a good place to trade one you didnt want its good saw
Silky for the win
I own both. Use both.
For durability & comfort, I'll take the Laplander.
However
In terms of calories expended per cut, the Silky is a much better option, but it isn't as durable as the Laplander and the blade isn't as tough.
Had a cheaper folding saw before the Bahco. It warped with the heat being produced when I was cutting up a fair bit of hard wood. The Bahco has never done that. It's very reliable, a tried and tested bit of kit. I'm sticking with the Bahco.
Just try a Silky. It just out cuts the Bacho.
Nothing cheap about Silky😂
Best review of the 2 I've seen . Think I will buy the silky. Been wanting to up grade my saw.
Good video , thanks for sharing , God bless !
Thanks for watching!
Nice Work Blackie!
now regarding the pull cutting stroke, I think there are 2 more reasons behind it.
All Japanese wood working tools are pull cutting, and that I think has also got to do with the fact that drawing enhances accuracy of motion.
And for being a pruning saw, let's not forget that branches to be cut are ABOVE the user mostly. So a pull stroke is both intuitive And necessary.
Good video Blackie.I own the Silky
Like it very much.Don't have Bacco,do have others mine held up well.Glad I bought Silky.They do offer other type of blade
Good choice
I've been comparing these two hand saws for a few weeks now myself and it's turned out to be a tough choice for me. My mind was made-up until just a few minutes ago when I started watching this year old video that popped-up in my feed suggestions. I was definitely going with the Bahco, I come to that decision because it cuts both ways, so I figured heck can't go wrong there. I even argued with someone on another video about it. I was like how can a saw that only cuts one way be better than a saw that cuts two ways:) HA! Guess I should just do like you and get'em both:) Back to the drawing board I guess, good review Blackie...
its a good saw
'Lenox trifold folding saw handle' takes all reciprocating saw blades. Its similar to silky or Bahco saw handle but takes all kinds of blades. Disposable blades, easy to find in any hardware store. Blades can be bent to cut into tight areas and bent back. Other companies make similar folding saw handles
I have the Silky SuperAccel21. It has an aluminum handle instead of the steel handle of the Gomboy. Mine has the large teeth, but a fine tooth blade is available.
Going to have a village in Japan named after you just like the one in Nepal!! 😂 and I agree 100% with you, I own and use both. Cheers
lol you keep saying that..
I'd still go with Bahco. European vs. Asian.
I have a thing for Scandinavian tools. They know what they're doing
Thumbs up!!!
Clark
WOW! You still have thumbs...I am jealous ;)
You could use bank line or small cordage in a loop with a cord lock through the mid blade hole on the Silky to hold blade closed. After removing, use it as wrist lanyard. Cheers
good idea
The silly blade's cutting edge is thicker than the backstrap so its designed to travel through the cut with much less friction.
I have no idea what the hole in the blade is for. Just saw replacement blades for The Silky Super Accel on eBay that does not have a hole. Also saw a complete saw for sale on Wesspur that did not have a hole in the blade. My Super Accel does have the hole in the blade.
Good side by side comparison. I’m still interested in seeing the video on those quick adjust pre-made guylines.
lol i shot it today for you it will be posted this week if all goes well
@@BLACKIETHOMAS can’t wait brother. You’re the best.
Just got myself the Bahco, it will accompany my Samuray Ichiban saw. Was tempted by the Silky.
Great demo, great description of quality of both saws.
I use a sawzall at home for limbing, hell with a hand saw. Backpacking on the other hand. Bacho is more durable.
Try the 10 inch Corona I think it’s the sweet spot in between the two…
Iv owned PB 170 & ultra excell 240 for 4 + yrs. Hole is to grip w/ thumb & fore finger to open blade. Not to hang it.
Use that grey matter.
Ive always wondered who was the actual woodsman who introduced this idea of carrying a folding saw. Anyone got any idea?? Thanks Blackie
I would guess as soon as folding saws were invented lots of hunters, and woodsmen immediately took them to the woods lol
Silky big boy and small silky for me I have a Baco and for the life of me I can not find where I put it .maybe lost in the woods .😢
Bahco for long term bug out = Gorilla proof slow but sure. Silky week ends as faster but can break easier and that's ok for a weekend the silky is less forgiving and in a survival situation / cold / injured / ..... Mistakes can happen and the Bahco is some what more forgiving. In the end both are great tools for the Correct task / conditions. There is no right or wrong here just have both and enjoy the outdoors. How I see it with 60+ years experience. Your mileage may vary.
Doesn't the Silky blades have a tendency to break? Where the Bahco blade flexes a lot more and resists that.
I got a hammock it's got a netting for mosquitoes and bugs that's hooked on permanently zipper to where I can get out of it but it takes two lines to put it dang it right can I use those two lines as a Ridgeline
yea should be able to
Bahco have teeth for dry wood, bone,... Silky have teeth for pruning... So two different teeth... Bahco have 396 JT BLADE and cut like Silky becouse they both have teeth for pruning and compare Silky and Bahco 396 JT BLADE, now that would be fair test.
Best regards
60+ cuts for Bahco, 30+ for Silky. bigger teeth better. i would buy Silky
try cutting fat wood with both and tell me which one you like best. We have had the silky plug and stop cutting. Bahco keeps on going. Just my personal observations.
Silky silky silky!
Trendy
silky cuts a lot better but the bacho is a lot harder to misuse and break. broken saws dont cut, the bacho you can just bend back into place is you bend it. that being said ive got 2 silkys and prefer them over the bacho. if i were to gift someone a saw who doesnt have one it will 100% always be the bacho because its more reliable in a beginners hands
I'll say it again, the only way a Silky blade is broken is through USER ERROR. Is it easy to do? Yes it is, but YOU broke it, the saw didn't break. It isn't a design flaw, or a defect. YOU broke it. All these people blaming the tool are simply not using it right. Don't buy or use a tool unless you use it correctly, goes for any tool. I've used Sandvik Laplanders (pre-Bahco) for decades before finding Silkys. There is NO comparison. (Edit) I think the hole is simply a notch to help open the blade.
The $20 Corona also has a Japanese blade .
ARS and Tagima.
Ill bet the whole on the silky saw blade is for one handed opening.
The fact that many American's think that sawing is on the push stroke just means they have forgotten how to use a hand saw. It has always been a greenhorn problem not to know what kind of saw they are using and trying to power through the process. You could find the same number who do not know how to properly use a hammer or an ax.
very true
might have to get a silky
Do u have a link were u can get it
i bought both of mine off of amazon
Yea I looked and thers so many
Is it fine medium or large teeth
medium teeth or large teeth 210
Nothing you said is not true. On the other hand nobody is forcing you to put pressure on the push stroke using the Bahco. Of course if you don't this will make it slower but it will stay in one piece. On the other hand if you do make the mistake to put pressure on the push stroke with the Silky it's very likely to snap. Silky even warns about this and you see many videos where this happened even with very experienced people. Sure they are both pruning saws. You can get different blades for different types of wood for the Silky so that's a pruning advantage as long as you have these other blades or can order them online. The Bahco Laplander will even cut bone.
Now this extended part on the Silky you use for striking your ferro rod will also rub through your pack or haversack in time. The Bahco Laplander has an all smooth rounded housing and won't rub through fabric in a hurry. It's also locked in the closed position.
So even though they are basically the same size and could be considered pruning size saws there's a whole different mindset behind the two saws. To compare them one on one is like comparing a filet knife with a thick saber grind all purpose knife.
But your conclusion is right. Going out in the garden get the right Silky with the right blade, order some spare blades online. Throwing in your pack get the Bahco and call it a day.
Silky took about 33 full strokes. The other blade took about twice as many full strokes.
So when you pull something you use both your biceps and your back muscles, but when you do a pushing action, you use only your triceps? No pectoral muscles? Hmm. Have you ever noticed that doing push ups is somewhat easier than doing pull ups? Someone who cannot execute a single pull up might be able to do a couple of push ups, and a fit person who can do both will always do twice or thrice as much when going for max reps?
The explanation of the muscle groups was a little off course but once you've owned and learned how to use the cut on the pull only, saws they are superior . If you mess around and break the Silky you were using it improperly. I'm 71 and have just learned about these cut on the pull only saws in the last 5 or 6 years. It takes much less energy to operate the Silkys than it does any other especially if you saw a lot when camping.
Pushing requires triceps, pectorals, and inner deltoids; pulling requires biceps, rear deltoids, and the much larger latissimus muscles of the back. Though whether the muscles make a difference is arguable: it's probably largely about technique.
When you do pull ups it's the entire weight of your body . When doing pushups the lower half of your body weight is only partially lifted for example your feet aren't lifted hardly any !!!