Robinson Annulation

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лют 2025
  • The Robinson Annulation is really neat, you guys. It's a Michael Addition followed by an intramolecular Aldol Condensation, and it makes a ring! Contain your excitement, you don't want a public disturbance violation.
    Watch the whole Organic Chemistry playlist: bit.ly/ProfDave...
    General Chemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
    Biochemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
    Biology Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveBio
    Classical Physics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
    Modern Physics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
    Mathematics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
    EMAIL► ProfessorDaveExplains@gmail.com
    PATREON► / professordaveexplains
    Check out "Is This Wi-Fi Organic?", my book on disarming pseudoscience!
    Amazon: amzn.to/2HtNpVH
    Bookshop: bit.ly/39cKADM
    Barnes and Noble: bit.ly/3pUjmrn
    Book Depository: bit.ly/3aOVDlT

КОМЕНТАРІ • 119

  • @cuckoobeats
    @cuckoobeats 3 місяці тому +3

    "He knows a lot about the science talks! Professor Dave rocks!!!" thank you so much I used to struggle in ochem and now this has been my favourite subject!

  • @kristinakafle4249
    @kristinakafle4249 2 роки тому +13

    Studying the day before my mcat, and this was the easiest and quickest explanations I could find and understand. Thank you SO much!

    • @andy0695
      @andy0695 2 роки тому +2

      How was the exam????

    • @kristinakafle4249
      @kristinakafle4249 2 роки тому +1

      @@andy0695 killed the chemistry/physics section! can't speak so much for the rest LOL

  • @CloudyGumption
    @CloudyGumption 9 років тому +14

    I am a great fan of this reaction mechanism, I do believe the OH is eliminated after electrons are pushed to the carbonyl oxygen in that last step. Like an E1cB

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  9 років тому +5

      David Wells yes indeed, the last part of an aldol condensation is an elimination, as shown here!

  • @YuliyaTsishchanka
    @YuliyaTsishchanka 5 років тому +2

    I have never left a comment on a video before but you are literally the best ever teacher on youtube and I wish you were my teacher-which you kind of are! Thank you so much for this!

  • @thebilla6568
    @thebilla6568 9 років тому +5

    One of the best on UA-cam. Thanks.

  • @Mary-cv2fm
    @Mary-cv2fm 8 років тому +11

    Professor Dave!!!!! I love your videos. They are extremely helpful, thank you for making them!!

  • @thirishar1237
    @thirishar1237 3 роки тому +2

    We got more information with less span of time....thank you very much prof.dave 🤗

  • @sydneyesposito8572
    @sydneyesposito8572 7 років тому +4

    Thank you so much for all your videos! You explain concepts so well, I always look for your videos before anything else when I need help. :)

  • @tyedyegurl1999
    @tyedyegurl1999 5 років тому +4

    T-5hr until my orgo exam and Dave out here saving my ass once again... not the hero I deserved, but the hero I needed.

  • @pierce1234567891
    @pierce1234567891 4 роки тому +4

    2020 coronavirus pandemic-sees professor dave cough-NO

  • @quentinmcilvaine4447
    @quentinmcilvaine4447 5 років тому +1

    you're a solid guy, Dave.

  • @TinaPhuong-hu8rc
    @TinaPhuong-hu8rc 2 місяці тому

    Thank you so much, Professor Dave. You have saved me in ochem 2 when my professor doesn’t teach 😅! 😊

  • @shrishtibhattarai8319
    @shrishtibhattarai8319 6 років тому +2

    Thanks for making it so simplistic.

  • @sudhagupta5719
    @sudhagupta5719 4 роки тому +1

    Easy and good explanation

  • @PunmasterSTP
    @PunmasterSTP 3 роки тому

    Robinson annulation? More like "This is some great knowledge and information!" Thanks again so much for making and sharing such amazing videos.

  • @nouralzahraafawaz8860
    @nouralzahraafawaz8860 6 років тому +15

    I have to thank you from the bottom of my heart 💜
    I have been studying through your amazing videos since 3 weeks!
    My exam is on Monday and I hope to do well!
    Wish me luckkk🤞🏻

    • @PunmasterSTP
      @PunmasterSTP 3 роки тому

      I know it's been awhile, but how did your exam go?

  • @giulialanza-billetta8133
    @giulialanza-billetta8133 8 років тому +3

    You're honestly the greatest! Thank you :)

  • @shaikhfirdousmuskanR
    @shaikhfirdousmuskanR 8 років тому +2

    awesome teaching ...thanku so much professor u have helped me alot for my xams.

  • @Kittendu18
    @Kittendu18 7 років тому +2

    OMG thank you so much ! This video is very useful, and it's short, effecient. Thank you Prof

  • @Emma-js7ui
    @Emma-js7ui 9 років тому +3

    Thanks! This was super helpful

  • @mshisha
    @mshisha 9 років тому +3

    This is wonderful. Thank you so much for your time!

  • @momijidoll13
    @momijidoll13 9 років тому +1

    WHERE were your videos when I was in first year?? Your videos are so effective and your style of simplifying complicated concepts is beyond brilliant. Would it be possible for you to make some videos on retrosynthesis? and maybe the organic chemistry of palladium?
    Thank you

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  9 років тому +1

      momijidoll13 I will absolutely add retrosynthesis to the list of next topics! Thanks for watching!

  • @omayma3542
    @omayma3542 8 років тому +2

    Thank you for that simple explanation !

  • @kacubemember3077
    @kacubemember3077 3 місяці тому

    Damn the exact question came in my exam, thanks prof!

  • @simonbedenbender3087
    @simonbedenbender3087 5 років тому +1

    Just watched two of your videos. They are very good and well explained. I was looking for some explanation for some name reactions during studying for my organic chemistry II examn. The script was very bad but just spending five minutes on your video gave me all explanation i needed thanks!!
    Just giving the links of your vids to the students would be better than reading the scrpit ;)
    Thanks from Germany!

    • @PunmasterSTP
      @PunmasterSTP 3 роки тому

      I know it's been a long time, but how did your exam go and how have your studies gone since then?

    • @simonbedenbender3087
      @simonbedenbender3087 3 роки тому +1

      The exam went well, I got a pretty good mark in the oral exam.
      But I havent got much contact with OC since then because I actually studied biochemistry, OC was just a subject we had to do

    • @PunmasterSTP
      @PunmasterSTP 3 роки тому

      @@simonbedenbender3087 I'm glad it went well! How did the rest of biochem go, and where did you end up career or academic-wise?

  • @Hauskkia
    @Hauskkia 7 років тому +2

    Awesome tutorial! It is a very cool reaction indeed.

  • @nouryassin7721
    @nouryassin7721 7 років тому +1

    Thank you professor 🤓

  • @alaanader9913
    @alaanader9913 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks so much you really helped me 🖤

  • @suhaibaziz4597
    @suhaibaziz4597 Рік тому

    Thank you Pro.

  • @elifacet3809
    @elifacet3809 6 років тому +1

    Thank you very much for your effort

  • @drgracional
    @drgracional 9 років тому +7

    Thanks from Brasil. Great job, Professor.

  • @youssefnaitlaarbi922
    @youssefnaitlaarbi922 6 років тому

    thanks from morocco ... great professor

  • @KoolViking3
    @KoolViking3 9 років тому +2

    Brilliant! Thanks!

  • @chemicalscience2445
    @chemicalscience2445 3 роки тому

    Really so helpful

  • @lyzzts
    @lyzzts 9 років тому +1

    Hi, sir. In regards to your mechanism at around 3:51 , I was wondering if there should be an arrow showing the movement of the bonding pair of electrons to the oxygen that will later have the negative charge?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  9 років тому +2

      +Alyaa Hakim ah yes, you're right, it seems i've omitted an arrow!

  • @heshamnasher4997
    @heshamnasher4997 2 роки тому

    Thank you very much for the good and clear effort :)

  • @Thaumius
    @Thaumius 2 роки тому

    4:35, isn't OH- typically a bad leaving group?

  • @kirubabowneeth3928
    @kirubabowneeth3928 7 років тому +2

    thank you sir.

  • @joanad1246
    @joanad1246 4 місяці тому

    Thank youuuuuu❤❤

  • @mrscience2314
    @mrscience2314 Місяць тому

    thank you sir

  • @buckyrx7
    @buckyrx7 8 місяців тому

    So this is kind of similar to a Dieckmann condensation being an intramolecular version of Claisen condensation?

  • @AlexzandriaL
    @AlexzandriaL 4 роки тому +2

    What is the overall reaction? I mean what do we write as the reagents for this rxn?

  • @kainatshaikh5781
    @kainatshaikh5781 7 років тому +1

    you're so amazing!

  • @celinekim432
    @celinekim432 9 місяців тому

    For the step after the tautomerism step, would the base used not have to be an LDA or stronger base to give the kinetic/less substituted product?

  • @ruger51995
    @ruger51995 3 роки тому +1

    Isnt OH a bad leaving group though?

  • @shanemichael9404
    @shanemichael9404 6 років тому

    Hey Prof. Dave. Me again. Pestering you by now probably. But, will be happy to donate by next month hopefully as I do deeply appreciate you answering my ridiculous questions. On the tauteromerization part (probably spelled it wrong) why does the OH grab that hydrogen on Carbon 4 shortly before the ring is made? I believe it's Carbon 4, it appears to be primary with 3 hydrogens. Anyway why that Carbon and not any on the other Carbons? Not surprised that curiosity hasn't killed me yet !

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  6 років тому

      so it's the pi bond that grabs the hydroxyl proton, whereas the OH sigma bond because a CO pi bond. check out my tutorial on michael addition, i more thoroughly discuss tautomerization!

  • @ismailsarenkapic485
    @ismailsarenkapic485 5 років тому

    Very helpfull tnx, can u pls next time film tje whole rection when u are done so we can see it

  • @claudiafeola9215
    @claudiafeola9215 6 років тому +1

    In the first step the enolization happens on the more substituted carbon. Why isn't the reaction controlled by a kinetik mechanism in basic conditions? (why not an attac on less substituted carbon?)

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  6 років тому +1

      Like I say in the video it's just because that proton is the most acidic! The conjugate base has resonance across two carbonyls.

  • @DarlinaLiu
    @DarlinaLiu 8 років тому +4

    How do you know which carbon to deprotonate (which enolate to form) during the intramolecular aldol condensation step?
    Also, at the end, do we really have hydroxide as a leaving group? Not water?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  8 років тому +2

      +Darlina Liu good questions! first, it's absolutely true that you could enolize on either side of the carbonyl for the second step, but a four-membered ring is much less likely to form, so enolization on the inside of the carbonyl might just be reversed to reform the carbonyl until enolization occurs on the other side, at which point the ring might snap shut to get the six-membered ring. and yes hydroxide is a reasonable leaving group in strong basic conditions, if there's a bunch of hydroxide swimming around in solution one more won't hurt.

    • @DarlinaLiu
      @DarlinaLiu 8 років тому +1

      +Professor Dave Explains Thanks for the thoughtful replies, Professor Dave!! Your videos are so so helpful, wish I discovered them earlier!

    • @Cobenski4
      @Cobenski4 Місяць тому

      Holy cow, thanks !

  • @christina24_12
    @christina24_12 6 років тому +1

    sir how do we know whether the product will form ring or not. why can't it remain linear sir.

    • @christina24_12
      @christina24_12 6 років тому

      sir I mean that how do we know for given two reagents, Robinson annulation will take place.

  • @a1738k
    @a1738k 5 років тому +1

    Will you get a racemic micture? The methyl group can be a wedge or a dash correct?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  5 років тому +1

      oh good question, i suppose so, i would probably have to draw it out with chairs to know for sure

    • @a1738k
      @a1738k 5 років тому +1

      @@ProfessorDaveExplains Alright, I was thinking the enolate can attack the Michael acceptor from any face (re so si) so you'd get a racemic mixture.

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  5 років тому

      well at that stage the molecule would be achiral because its meso, but the product is chiral, so i'm actually not positive if there is anything that would favor one isomer over another, there may be information in the chairs

    • @a1738k
      @a1738k 5 років тому

      @@ProfessorDaveExplains Yeah exactly, thanks!

  • @korangalalita1229
    @korangalalita1229 6 років тому

    Thanks sir

  • @GingerRootss
    @GingerRootss 9 років тому

    Why doesn't the Robinson Annulation always happen because the product of a michael addition creates two carbonyl groups that could react as such?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  9 років тому +1

      Eva C well it depends on the structure of the electrophile, it needs to be able to form a six-membered ring in the transition state of the second step, so if there is a phenyl or tert-butyl group alpha to the carbonyl it won't work. there could also be issues due to sterics. but fundamentally you are correct that many michael additions could result in subsequent robinson annulation.

  • @niranjanpradhan1252
    @niranjanpradhan1252 7 років тому

    nice video sir

  • @mariamejaz3429
    @mariamejaz3429 Рік тому

    JazaqAllah Sir

  • @sukainaalherz3554
    @sukainaalherz3554 10 років тому +1

    I like your way in explanation Is there any video in this account about (syn) and (anti) or (Si/ Ri).

  • @dancingdodo2768
    @dancingdodo2768 7 років тому +4

    If I pass my organic chemistry exam on Monday, I'll have you to thank!

    • @PunmasterSTP
      @PunmasterSTP 3 роки тому

      I know it's been a while, but did you pass?

    • @dancingdodo2768
      @dancingdodo2768 3 роки тому

      @@PunmasterSTP to be honest, I can't remember if it came up on whatever exam it was for, but I sit here waiting to start a PhD in polymer chemistry in April so I can say the video is at least good enough not to have you fail

    • @PunmasterSTP
      @PunmasterSTP 3 роки тому

      @@dancingdodo2768 That's amazing, and that sounds like an awesome field to do research in! Is your ultimate goal to go into industry, stay in academia, or do something else?

    • @dancingdodo2768
      @dancingdodo2768 3 роки тому +1

      @@PunmasterSTP the PhD is sponsored by the company I work for but afterwards, I don't really have a preference. I just want to do research. I haven't got the patience for the stupidity of commercialisation

    • @PunmasterSTP
      @PunmasterSTP 3 роки тому

      @@dancingdodo2768 I gotcha. Please forgive my ignorance, but what type (or subtypes) of polymer chemistry are there? Which one(s) would you hope to conduct?

  • @msathishkumar1159
    @msathishkumar1159 7 років тому

    Sir, it's very useful learns organic chemistry mechanism sir. I have one question about the Robinson annulation reaction sir. That is what is the stereo chemistry behind in the last water molecule elimination step sir

  • @caseyhagg2657
    @caseyhagg2657 7 років тому

    Thanks for the clear explanation! I am curious what the significance of your tattoo is?

  • @jasonhowe5006
    @jasonhowe5006 5 років тому

    beast.

  • @patmahgroyn6868
    @patmahgroyn6868 9 років тому

    can you do a robinson annulation without a di-carbonyl reagent?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  9 років тому

      steven schulster I wouldn't think so, as you need one carbonyl to enolize for the first step, and the other to act as the electrophile in the second step.

  • @sciencenerd7639
    @sciencenerd7639 3 роки тому

    fascinating

  • @kusalseven3563
    @kusalseven3563 6 років тому

    i think it doesnt stop there

  • @SkudzYNBuddies
    @SkudzYNBuddies 8 років тому

    how come you use hydroxide as a base? i've been taught to always use sodium ethoxide for these mechanisms and michael addition itself

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  8 років тому

      +its Skudzy hydroxide is the classic, that's what i typically see. methoxide or ethoxide are fine too. kind of arbitrary i think.

    • @SkudzYNBuddies
      @SkudzYNBuddies 8 років тому

      okay thank you for the answer!

  • @ayoub4144
    @ayoub4144 6 років тому

    merci beaucoup

  • @abdulbasit-qf7bb
    @abdulbasit-qf7bb 10 років тому

    nice sir

  • @annagmg230
    @annagmg230 3 роки тому

    J'adore merci beaucoup

  • @Sundernayno
    @Sundernayno 5 років тому

    Nice

  • @claudiafeola9215
    @claudiafeola9215 6 років тому +1

    sei un mago

  • @n.s.1496
    @n.s.1496 9 років тому

    I gotta tell my university about you...

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  9 років тому +1

      +Nickolai indeed you must! spread the good word.

    • @n.s.1496
      @n.s.1496 9 років тому

      Any chance you could post organic chem videos on phenols, amines to amide conversion and Mass spect? :)

    • @n.s.1496
      @n.s.1496 9 років тому

      Oh and you are absolutely wonderful. The text book is way to thick in its terminology to understand

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  9 років тому

      +Nickolai i will add to the list! i definitely plan to do all forms of spectroscopy/spectrometry.

  • @minakshibanerjee3732
    @minakshibanerjee3732 5 років тому

    sir i love chemistry and also you

  • @kaustavdas6829
    @kaustavdas6829 8 років тому

    hi, i really like your videos and i am having a hard time understanding Hofmann exhaustive methylation . Could you please upload a video explaining it's mechanism and everything.

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  8 років тому

      +Kaustav Das nitrogen lone pair does SN2 on methyl iodide until no more methyls can be accommodated!

    • @kaustavdas6829
      @kaustavdas6829 8 років тому +1

      +Professor Dave Explains if the nitrogen lone pair is in resonance with the ring then what happens?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  8 років тому +1

      +Kaustav Das it can still be methylated, it will just probably be less kinetically favorable and also bear a formal positive charge in the product.

  • @ruger51995
    @ruger51995 3 роки тому

    Moves a bit fast

  • @pavanivishnoi5851
    @pavanivishnoi5851 3 роки тому

    Hindi please🙏