I always knew the models looked more colourful in the films but I don't think I'd realised quite how much more weathered they looked in the original series, which definitely looks better. I feel like the sequences themselves both have merit, and they certainly felt more cinematic for the film versions, which is partly down to the filming (I think the small detail of the cameras actually moving rather than being static contributes to that), but also the slightly more impactful version of the theme tune as well. I also liked that they fixed the rotation of TB1 in the first film, and always found it odd that they then refilmed it again for Thunderbird 6 and had it back around the original "wrong" way! Let's face it though, it all looks and sounds awesome whichever version it is! Nothing will ever beat it in my eyes.
Pretty sure neither are the correct way as the vertical Tunderbird faces away from the launch bay at the top of the elevator and is suddenly 180° round at the end facing the launch bay.
Not gonna lie, but I actually prefer Thunderbird 1 facing the "wrong" way when taking off. Mainly cuz of how they usually show her taking off from that camera angle, which I assume was why they show Thunderbird 1 suddenly rotated that way.
That's actually something that was addressed in the cutaway drawing books. It rotates on its way down the tunnel in order to orient itself with an evacuation gantry in case something goes wrong with the launch
The launches from the movie and show have equal advantages and disadvantages. In the movie version you get a sense of scale and detail you'd won't get on show versions but the slower pace allowed you to take in the glory of the models more. Either way both are gorgeous.
The TB2 TV version is by far my favorite. for the other ones: althought I understand the fact that while going down the ramp TB1 did an unexpected 1/4 turn in the TV version, I prefer this one because the "1" is clearly visible, something not clear on the movie version.
That's actually something that was addressed in the cutaway drawing books. It rotates on its way down the tunnel in order to orient itself with an evacuation gantry in case something goes wrong with the launch
Forget CGI, I wish the original series was still being shown on TV here in the UK. My grandson would love to see them. I can only show him short clips on UA-cam. He is approaching his 3rd birthday and he’s tiring of Paw Patrol. He can even mimic the theme tune. That’s my boy!! 😄
@@oliverconway6960 - thank you for that Oliver. My grandson is now enjoying the original Thunderbirds, full episodes, that I found on UA-cam channels. But I will certainly look up Talking Pictures also. He is so mad about the show now that three of his Christmas presents are all Thunderbirds related!! His Mum had them delivered to our home, so it will be great to see his reaction on Christmas morning when they are all over from England for the holidays. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you and yours.
@@magnificentmuttley2084 That's so heartwarming. Many years ago I got a Thunderbirds Tracy Island playset for Christmas. I hope your grandson enjoys his presents the same way I did. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you too.
The original sequences for me every time. Mind you, in the movies, they did add a second floor to get the proportions of the roundhouse closer to that of TB3. No such attention to detail on the palm trees that pivot out of the way for TB2's launch - those must be nearly as tall as your average sequoia in comparison to the craft?
I agree with other comments that the models feel too clean in the movie version. But one thing to note, crews that man fire trucks, tanks, planes, etc. actually take very good care of their vehicles. They wash them all the time. I have some friends that were fire fighters and a person that was a tank driver and all indicated how much time they dedicated to cleaning and maintenance.
I always prefered the original series shots. On average they have more drama and are grittier. Especially TB 1 and 2 look more toylike to me in the movies. Never did the TB2 look as good as in the original launch sequence. One could however mix a best of takes version if the sharpness and colour of both versions could be matched.
I watched it here in Brazil in the 70s on the now defunct TV Tupi, I loved the original version with a passion, but I also watched the cinema version and was very satisfied, and it was great to satisfy that nostalgia. Congratulations on the post
I've always prefered the original launches and the original TV series 1 sets and models over the films and series 2 sets, models and launches. The film Thuderbird models have less character. As they're too clean and look less realistic and like models, because they haven't been slightly weathered and dirtied like the TV series models were. The film and series 2 cockpits and Tracy Lounge sets also look less pleasing than the original series 1 sets. They gave all the decor a much darker tone. The walls, floors and furniture were changed from colourful warm and light shades of whites, yellows, oranges, reds, and greens. To much darker, drab and dull monotone shades of blacks, darkish browns and darkish greys. That dull colour tone made the set spaces look more closed in and smaller, dull and boring, and less warm and inviting. I think the Andersons' and set designers realised that themselves, because for Captain Scarlet and Joe 90 they returned the decor or the sets back to a lighter, warmer and more colourful design.
I found that with the film models. They seem too clean to be these big rescue machines. The series 1 set designs do have alot more character in the compered to the series 2/film sets 😊
The originals will always hold more nostalgia for me but the scale correction to make the roundhouse into a two storey building instead of a one storey building was badly needed. It’s just a pity that they dropped the ball with the relative scales of Thunderbird 2 and Zero-X later in the film! (FAB1 shouldn’t be able to drive through the windows of Zero-X. Also, it’s never a good look to overshadow your hero vehicles.)
Personally I think the original telly versions looked better but what I love is the fact that someone (ie you Joe mate) has just made such a fun YT vid. Ta. 😀
I'd have to say that I prefer the original version of the launches. Mostly because some of the Thunderbird ships look to new to be real. The ones in the original look like they've seen action and are a bit weathered as opposed to the look brand new ships of the movie.
It's kind of endearing that when making the films, someone clearly thought "Aha. We've made some continuuity goofs with the launches", especially with regard to which way round TB1 sits on it's cradle (always so it's facing the camera) and decided to fix that in the movie. And STILL messed it up by rotating the model 180 degrees as it slips down! They always seemed to mix up the TB3 crew on the couch. Taken as a whole though, the weathering of the craft in the TV series is much the superior so gets my vote.
The film ones are impressive, but they seem to have more errors than the originals, such as one of thunderbird 3’s sides being blank, the rockets on thunderbird 1 changing position midway through launch, a couple of minor things that slightly dampen the spectacle. Thunderbird 2 running into the camera is sweet, and thunderbird 5 looks lovely in the few scenes it appears. Poor thunderbird 4 got robbed despite being on the movie poster
Honestly the original is just so much better. The movies may be more accurate but the problem for me is they actually look like models while the original I could be fooled to think they are real ships.
@@SeriousJoe And then on the second mission we get it all over again but a shortened version. Out of the two of them Thunderbird 6 was better but there was enough script material for either movie to get through 90 minutes. You can see why they were a failure at the box office. There are times when they are utterly boring to watch.
Still can't get over how horrible thunderbird 1 looked in the films. From the missing black rings, the missing TBs on the tail section, or the rear fins being too far forwards. Thunderbird 2 just looks wrong. I read somewhere once that the wrong dimensions were used when making the model for the film, although I'm not sure how true that is.
Hands down I prefer the film version. We _are_ talking about the sofa, aren't we? Seriously though, for the actual lift off moments the film Thunderbird 3 lift off seems more convincing as a massive, heavy craft blasting off, and the actual ramp departure a 1:16 is so much better than the ones where Thunderbird 2 dips as it leaves the ramp. The ship lifting off before the end if the ramp again looks so much more powerful. But the latter has me stumped, the trees look like the TV version but TB2 itself looks like the film version.
Did you notice they fixed the rotation issue? Around 1.00 you can see the film TB1 is side-on and the series TB1 is front-on, having mysteriously pivoted as it came down the ramp!
That's actually something that was addressed in the cutaway drawing books. It rotates on its way down the tunnel in order to orient itself with an evacuation gantry in case something goes wrong with the launch
Film version looks great for the big screen, but definitely prefer the TV version, especially as I've always preferred the TV series over the films anyway. Plus I prefer the Series 1 marionettes and interior sets of the Thunderbird machines and Tracy Island than the Series 2/film look. And also David Holliday voicing Virgil than Jeremy Wilkin (though Wilkin was good too). What I did find disappointing about both films though was they never included the middle segment of the Thunderbirds theme tune, which was heard a lot throughout the series. If you listen to Barry Gray's full recording of the film version of the theme tune, it can be heard, but was cut from both films.
In general I prefer the original TV launches over the film….I tend to think they had more dynamic angles on the ships, whereas in the film they were shot face on most of the time.
I believe that the plastic toys I had way back in the 60's were based on the films rather than the TV show, hence the wide variation in TB1 and 2 particularly although in fairness they were pretty true to the film. Wasn't till I saw the side by side comparison shots here that I realised the full extent of the variations however. For the Dinky metal toys the Captain Scarlet ones were reasonably accurate but I was told that Dinky high-ups felt that the UFO series models of the interceptors and SHADO mobiles would benefit from a more military looking paint job (ie green) so as to make them acceptable to "regular" toy collectors who would maybe be fooled into thinking they were weird army vehicles. Dunno if that's true but the first version of the eagle from space 1999 was green as well (possibly the same paint job as the UFO toys). Speculating here but I know Space 1999 was originally developed as the second season of UFO before last minute alterations to that plan but given how far ahead these merchandising tie-ins are planned it mat be that Dinky were keeping the green military look consistent for the eagles and interceptors to be on screen together in UFO season 2 ? Bit of guesswork there but who knows? There was a later eagle dinky model - a white version used as a cargo vessel so if you bought both then you could swap the white people carrying pod from the green version with the transport pod and have a reasonably TV accurate white eagle model. If you are interested the best models are IMHO the Product Enterprise range which pop up on ebay a lot - they are from Japan and horrendously expensive (at least on my budget) but I managed to get a good few of them over the years and they are brilliantly accurate and faithful to the shows.
Thanks for the video. F A B. JEFF TRACY: "Well boys this is our first assignment so make it look good. Boys, I think we're in business." Thunderbird 2, The Big Green Bug. Thunderbird 4, International Rescue's Yellow Submarine. Where are the toilets on Tracy Villa?
In the film the continuity error was removed in respect of the Thunderbird 1 launch. The aircraft doesn't appear to rotate through 90 degrees whilst descending as shown in the original
That's actually something that was addressed in the cutaway drawing books. It rotates on its way down the tunnel in order to orient itself with an evacuation gantry in case something goes wrong with the launch
I liked the originals because the models looked more worn down, like they've seen action for real. The movie versions are too polished, most notably Thunderbird 1. It just doesn't look the same. I'm sure the Tracys have cleaning done on the vehicles, but a vehicle that has been used a lot will show signs of wear and tear after many uses. Plus the show had the amazing launch sequences down already.
No: I think too much people realised that too. For me the most "perfect" model of TB2 is the one were the letters and number have the same size, however the markings of this model are incorrect as the "2" must have been larger.
Yes, they obviously must've modified it after "Trapped in the Sky" as we immediately see the larger "2" in the second episode "Pit of Peril". I personally prefer the larger "2".
The original is far better than the film version, mostly becasue it moves through all the angles. I suspect with the film, they didn't want to repeat everything and probably knew which cuts were harder the first time around.
That's actually something that was addressed in the cutaway drawing books. It rotates on its way down the tunnel in order to orient itself with an evacuation gantry in case something goes wrong with the launch
I always knew the models looked more colourful in the films but I don't think I'd realised quite how much more weathered they looked in the original series, which definitely looks better. I feel like the sequences themselves both have merit, and they certainly felt more cinematic for the film versions, which is partly down to the filming (I think the small detail of the cameras actually moving rather than being static contributes to that), but also the slightly more impactful version of the theme tune as well. I also liked that they fixed the rotation of TB1 in the first film, and always found it odd that they then refilmed it again for Thunderbird 6 and had it back around the original "wrong" way!
Let's face it though, it all looks and sounds awesome whichever version it is! Nothing will ever beat it in my eyes.
Pretty sure neither are the correct way as the vertical Tunderbird faces away from the launch bay at the top of the elevator and is suddenly 180° round at the end facing the launch bay.
@@jasoncp3257 I think they explain it as the pad itself being on a turntable that turns TB1 in whatever direction it need to launch in
Not gonna lie, but I actually prefer Thunderbird 1 facing the "wrong" way when taking off. Mainly cuz of how they usually show her taking off from that camera angle, which I assume was why they show Thunderbird 1 suddenly rotated that way.
That's actually something that was addressed in the cutaway drawing books. It rotates on its way down the tunnel in order to orient itself with an evacuation gantry in case something goes wrong with the launch
The launches from the movie and show have equal advantages and disadvantages.
In the movie version you get a sense of scale and detail you'd won't get on show versions but the slower pace allowed you to take in the glory of the models more.
Either way both are gorgeous.
the Original TV Launch Squences Hands Down.
Yep!
I like the original version best because it’s got amazing scenes and excellent experience
The TB2 TV version is by far my favorite. for the other ones: althought I understand the fact that while going down the ramp TB1 did an unexpected 1/4 turn in the TV version, I prefer this one because the "1" is clearly visible, something not clear on the movie version.
That's actually something that was addressed in the cutaway drawing books. It rotates on its way down the tunnel in order to orient itself with an evacuation gantry in case something goes wrong with the launch
Forget CGI, I wish the original series was still being shown on TV here in the UK. My grandson would love to see them. I can only show him short clips on UA-cam. He is approaching his 3rd birthday and he’s tiring of Paw Patrol. He can even mimic the theme tune. That’s my boy!! 😄
That's so sweet! I think they have all the episodes on BritBox or you can find some on daily motion 😊
@@SeriousJoe They're on ITVX too.
They're on TalkingPictures right now too.
@@oliverconway6960 - thank you for that Oliver. My grandson is now enjoying the original Thunderbirds, full episodes, that I found on UA-cam channels. But I will certainly look up Talking Pictures also. He is so mad about the show now that three of his Christmas presents are all Thunderbirds related!! His Mum had them delivered to our home, so it will be great to see his reaction on Christmas morning when they are all over from England for the holidays. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you and yours.
@@magnificentmuttley2084 That's so heartwarming. Many years ago I got a Thunderbirds Tracy Island playset for Christmas. I hope your grandson enjoys his presents the same way I did. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you too.
The original sequences for me every time. Mind you, in the movies, they did add a second floor to get the proportions of the roundhouse closer to that of TB3. No such attention to detail on the palm trees that pivot out of the way for TB2's launch - those must be nearly as tall as your average sequoia in comparison to the craft?
I agree with other comments that the models feel too clean in the movie version. But one thing to note, crews that man fire trucks, tanks, planes, etc. actually take very good care of their vehicles. They wash them all the time. I have some friends that were fire fighters and a person that was a tank driver and all indicated how much time they dedicated to cleaning and maintenance.
Love how Grouge Lucas and ILM spoke about dirtying the models. Gerty did it a decade befote anyone
I always prefered the original series shots. On average they have more drama and are grittier. Especially TB 1 and 2 look more toylike to me in the movies. Never did the TB2 look as good as in the original launch sequence. One could however mix a best of takes version if the sharpness and colour of both versions could be matched.
I watched it here in Brazil in the 70s on the now defunct TV Tupi, I loved the original version with a passion, but I also watched the cinema version and was very satisfied, and it was great to satisfy that nostalgia. Congratulations on the post
Still love this program
I've always prefered the original launches and the original TV series 1 sets and models over the films and series 2 sets, models and launches. The film Thuderbird models have less character. As they're too clean and look less realistic and like models, because they haven't been slightly weathered and dirtied like the TV series models were.
The film and series 2 cockpits and Tracy Lounge sets also look less pleasing than the original series 1 sets. They gave all the decor a much darker tone. The walls, floors and furniture were changed from colourful warm and light shades of whites, yellows, oranges, reds, and greens. To much darker, drab and dull monotone shades of blacks, darkish browns and darkish greys. That dull colour tone made the set spaces look more closed in and smaller, dull and boring, and less warm and inviting.
I think the Andersons' and set designers realised that themselves, because for Captain Scarlet and Joe 90 they returned the decor or the sets back to a lighter, warmer and more colourful design.
I found that with the film models. They seem too clean to be these big rescue machines. The series 1 set designs do have alot more character in the compered to the series 2/film sets 😊
Andy, was that typo deliberate? I love "Thuderbirds"!
Las dos versiones son excelentes, pero como desde que era niño veía la secuencia original, votaría por la original..... Son FABulosos
The originals will always hold more nostalgia for me but the scale correction to make the roundhouse into a two storey building instead of a one storey building was badly needed. It’s just a pity that they dropped the ball with the relative scales of Thunderbird 2 and Zero-X later in the film! (FAB1 shouldn’t be able to drive through the windows of Zero-X. Also, it’s never a good look to overshadow your hero vehicles.)
There is nothing, nothing better than the original
Personally I think the original telly versions looked better but what I love is the fact that someone (ie you Joe mate) has just made such a fun YT vid. Ta. 😀
Thank you very much! I'm glad you liked it! ☺
I'd have to say that I prefer the original version of the launches. Mostly because some of the Thunderbird ships look to new to be real. The ones in the original look like they've seen action and are a bit weathered as opposed to the look brand new ships of the movie.
It's kind of endearing that when making the films, someone clearly thought "Aha. We've made some continuuity goofs with the launches", especially with regard to which way round TB1 sits on it's cradle (always so it's facing the camera) and decided to fix that in the movie. And STILL messed it up by rotating the model 180 degrees as it slips down! They always seemed to mix up the TB3 crew on the couch.
Taken as a whole though, the weathering of the craft in the TV series is much the superior so gets my vote.
Take a look at TB1 moving down to the launch pad. They used a sophisticated crane shot - Derek Meddings was a class act
The film ones are impressive, but they seem to have more errors than the originals, such as one of thunderbird 3’s sides being blank, the rockets on thunderbird 1 changing position midway through launch, a couple of minor things that slightly dampen the spectacle.
Thunderbird 2 running into the camera is sweet, and thunderbird 5 looks lovely in the few scenes it appears.
Poor thunderbird 4 got robbed despite being on the movie poster
Honestly the original is just so much better. The movies may be more accurate but the problem for me is they actually look like models while the original I could be fooled to think they are real ships.
Yes, there's just something about the TV series they got perfectly spot on which they couldn't quite recapture in the movies.
@@AndrewChapman I think it’s the lighting and the film versions weren’t dirty enough.
@@jameskingman1227 Yes, exactly.
@@AndrewChapman kind of my issue with season 2 aswell. Except for the Atlantic Inferno I don’t think it quite had the same charm.
The originals win in every sequence. The new models are too shiny and you see all the studio lights reflected on them, too..
Tv versions still look amazing. But film versions looks like done at large4 scale for big screen
I'd have sat through 10 minutes of thunderbird 2 and the pods than 10 minutes of watching that bloody zero x fitting together. Talk about padding out.
The Zero X assembly although Iconic does tend to drag alot.
@@SeriousJoe And then on the second mission we get it all over again but a shortened version. Out of the two of them Thunderbird 6 was better but there was enough script material for either movie to get through 90 minutes. You can see why they were a failure at the box office. There are times when they are utterly boring to watch.
Still can't get over how horrible thunderbird 1 looked in the films. From the missing black rings, the missing TBs on the tail section, or the rear fins being too far forwards. Thunderbird 2 just looks wrong. I read somewhere once that the wrong dimensions were used when making the model for the film, although I'm not sure how true that is.
It's got to be the original for me without a question of doubt... FAB
Thank You for Sharing This it's Facinating
Ngl I thought when I saw the Century 21 logo, I thought I clicked on a Captain Scarlet video!
They use it in the film so thought it fitted 😊
I think the Original TV Launch Sequences actually look more realistic, the film models look more toy like with less grime on them.
Hands down I prefer the film version.
We _are_ talking about the sofa, aren't we?
Seriously though, for the actual lift off moments the film Thunderbird 3 lift off seems more convincing as a massive, heavy craft blasting off, and the actual ramp departure a 1:16 is so much better than the ones where Thunderbird 2 dips as it leaves the ramp. The ship lifting off before the end if the ramp again looks so much more powerful. But the latter has me stumped, the trees look like the TV version but TB2 itself looks like the film version.
Original everything.
Did you notice they fixed the rotation issue? Around 1.00 you can see the film TB1 is side-on and the series TB1 is front-on, having mysteriously pivoted as it came down the ramp!
That's actually something that was addressed in the cutaway drawing books. It rotates on its way down the tunnel in order to orient itself with an evacuation gantry in case something goes wrong with the launch
Film version looks great for the big screen, but definitely prefer the TV version, especially as I've always preferred the TV series over the films anyway. Plus I prefer the Series 1 marionettes and interior sets of the Thunderbird machines and Tracy Island than the Series 2/film look. And also David Holliday voicing Virgil than Jeremy Wilkin (though Wilkin was good too). What I did find disappointing about both films though was they never included the middle segment of the Thunderbirds theme tune, which was heard a lot throughout the series. If you listen to Barry Gray's full recording of the film version of the theme tune, it can be heard, but was cut from both films.
Well they were BOTH pretty good. And close to 👍👍👍👍 ,,,,,,but the ORIGINAL is always. Great. 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
In general I prefer the original TV launches over the film….I tend to think they had more dynamic angles on the ships, whereas in the film they were shot face on most of the time.
Why were the Dinky die cast of so many of the Anderson vehicles colored incorrectly?
Not too sure? The plastic toys always seemed to have much more accurate colours to them over the die casts
I believe that the plastic toys I had way back in the 60's were based on the films rather than the TV show, hence the wide variation in TB1 and 2 particularly although in fairness they were pretty true to the film. Wasn't till I saw the side by side comparison shots here that I realised the full extent of the variations however. For the Dinky metal toys the Captain Scarlet ones were reasonably accurate but I was told that Dinky high-ups felt that the UFO series models of the interceptors and SHADO mobiles would benefit from a more military looking paint job (ie green) so as to make them acceptable to "regular" toy collectors who would maybe be fooled into thinking they were weird army vehicles. Dunno if that's true but the first version of the eagle from space 1999 was green as well (possibly the same paint job as the UFO toys). Speculating here but I know Space 1999 was originally developed as the second season of UFO before last minute alterations to that plan but given how far ahead these merchandising tie-ins are planned it mat be that Dinky were keeping the green military look consistent for the eagles and interceptors to be on screen together in UFO season 2 ? Bit of guesswork there but who knows? There was a later eagle dinky model - a white version used as a cargo vessel so if you bought both then you could swap the white people carrying pod from the green version with the transport pod and have a reasonably TV accurate white eagle model. If you are interested the best models are IMHO the Product Enterprise range which pop up on ebay a lot - they are from Japan and horrendously expensive (at least on my budget) but I managed to get a good few of them over the years and they are brilliantly accurate and faithful to the shows.
Thanks for the video. F A B. JEFF TRACY: "Well boys this is our first assignment so make it look good. Boys, I think we're in business." Thunderbird 2, The Big Green Bug. Thunderbird 4, International Rescue's Yellow Submarine. Where are the toilets on Tracy Villa?
In the film the continuity error was removed in respect of the Thunderbird 1 launch. The aircraft doesn't appear to rotate through 90 degrees whilst descending as shown in the original
That's actually something that was addressed in the cutaway drawing books. It rotates on its way down the tunnel in order to orient itself with an evacuation gantry in case something goes wrong with the launch
Original 100% looks metal and well used
I liked the originals because the models looked more worn down, like they've seen action for real. The movie versions are too polished, most notably Thunderbird 1. It just doesn't look the same. I'm sure the Tracys have cleaning done on the vehicles, but a vehicle that has been used a lot will show signs of wear and tear after many uses.
Plus the show had the amazing launch sequences down already.
I want to know why launch of Thunderbird 2 from its base needs the complex ramp system, and yet when it's on a mission, it takes off vertically.
That's a good point. I haven't really thought about that 🤔
I like the original version best
Loved them both, but something doesn't sit well with me with TB3, that hydraulic couch, who else has spotted it?😉
Am I the only one that noticed, that the "2" on the side of Thunderbird 2 varied in size from shot to shot, in the programme?
I noticed that too recently! Always thought it was just me seeing things.
No: I think too much people realised that too. For me the most "perfect" model of TB2 is the one were the letters and number have the same size, however the markings of this model are incorrect as the "2" must have been larger.
Yes, they obviously must've modified it after "Trapped in the Sky" as we immediately see the larger "2" in the second episode "Pit of Peril". I personally prefer the larger "2".
Did anyone notice Scott changes position on sofa in launch of TB3?
Original, without doubt!
Don't worry about it both are fine
Indeed, the original is better!!
２号のポッドを選択する場面で、２号の伸縮脚の間をポッドは通過出来ないと思うのですが…？
The original is far better than the film version, mostly becasue it moves through all the angles. I suspect with the film, they didn't want to repeat everything and probably knew which cuts were harder the first time around.
In the film sequence, TB 1 doesn’t do a strange, unseen 90 degree turn before launching.
That's actually something that was addressed in the cutaway drawing books. It rotates on its way down the tunnel in order to orient itself with an evacuation gantry in case something goes wrong with the launch
@@tracytron7162 thank you.
Je préfère la version originale de la série de 1965.
Not really a lot of differences which shows the genius of the original
They nailed the launches with the originals, and TB2 never looked good after they trashed the original.
😊😊
I think just the tv
Mostly original. But a little of this and a little of that, the longer the better.
Original
For me the originals are way better, why do they have to of messed with them 🤷♂️
Isto queria efeitos especiais
the originals are so much better...
I have to say the film launches are far worse in my view.. am I the only one?
Original