@@myautochannelbyjohnmike563 Nice. Their claims 0-100 is much slower, like 8.4 sec only, maybe imporved ecu parameters, like some c180k or 200k, have the same HP, but much better torque then claimed. It is very strange thing with this w204 models. Mine c200k stock has 270 nm when dynoed and 8.0 secs 0-100 secs, but claimed only 8.6 sec and 250 nm
Nice 👍🏽 with the Manual it launches really well.
I got a w203 C230 with manual transmission and is an excellent car to drive. Not very fast but it runs smoothly
Yes, you're right
I got a w204 c200 it runs smoothly that's for sure
Can i ask a Question where is the Rev Limiter Cutoff of this car is it 6700 Rpm?
Yes
@@myautochannelbyjohnmike563 nice
It's modified?
No, is stok car
@@myautochannelbyjohnmike563 Nice. Their claims 0-100 is much slower, like 8.4 sec only, maybe imporved ecu parameters, like some c180k or 200k, have the same HP, but much better torque then claimed. It is very strange thing with this w204 models. Mine c200k stock has 270 nm when dynoed and 8.0 secs 0-100 secs, but claimed only 8.6 sec and 250 nm
slow
Yes 😂😂