I simply think Starfield needs the NMS treatment. Remember what a mess THAT game was when it originally came out? Now look at it. It didn't happen over night, it took a bunch of patches/updates, but it IS what it was originally intended to be, possibly a bit more. Where Bethesda should start is with UI fixes, like an actual mini-map, & a land vehicle for planets & dresses for the female characters. For the land vehicle I'd suggest a 2 seater dune buggy type thing, just big enough for you & a companion. I'd also say that only B or C class ships should be able to carry it, as well as your outposts, depending on the build. Starfield can still be a more human centric story; leave the intelligent aliens for a 2nd Starfield game. Will Bethesda do these things which I feel MUST be done, or will they be lazy & let the modders do it? As for as the Creation Engine goes, I get that they want to keep it since it's proprietary, but it's obviously past time to retire it. Make a new engine, using the current one as the foundation of it, if they like.
That won't work. The "NMS treatment" only works if your game is good at it's core, and it's problems are that it is unfinished and buggy. Same with Cyberpunk, there was always a good story driven action game at it's core, it's problem was that it wasen't finished, and very buggy. Over time you can fix bugs, you can add missing content, polish up some features, but if the game wasen't good at it's core, that's not going to save the project. Starfield, at it's very core, is an incredibly niche game. It does have it's audience, it's niche, but nomatter how much you fix and tweak it, it will never be anything but niche. It will never see the popularity of the Elder Scrolls and Fallout games.
Reaction Stated at 7:31 if any one impatient to want to hear context of this video.🙃
Fun fact:
Starfield has right now as many active players as Skyrim SE
スターフィールドはオブリビオンと同じくらい大きなミームだが、それよりもはるかに悪い
そもそもゲームエンジンは同じだしな
ただオブリビオンより15年古い。。
I simply think Starfield needs the NMS treatment. Remember what a mess THAT game was when it originally came out? Now look at it. It didn't happen over night, it took a bunch of patches/updates, but it IS what it was originally intended to be, possibly a bit more. Where Bethesda should start is with UI fixes, like an actual mini-map, & a land vehicle for planets & dresses for the female characters. For the land vehicle I'd suggest a 2 seater dune buggy type thing, just big enough for you & a companion. I'd also say that only B or C class ships should be able to carry it, as well as your outposts, depending on the build. Starfield can still be a more human centric story; leave the intelligent aliens for a 2nd Starfield game.
Will Bethesda do these things which I feel MUST be done, or will they be lazy & let the modders do it?
As for as the Creation Engine goes, I get that they want to keep it since it's proprietary, but it's obviously past time to retire it. Make a new engine, using the current one as the foundation of it, if they like.
That won't work.
The "NMS treatment" only works if your game is good at it's core, and it's problems are that it is unfinished and buggy. Same with Cyberpunk, there was always a good story driven action game at it's core, it's problem was that it wasen't finished, and very buggy.
Over time you can fix bugs, you can add missing content, polish up some features, but if the game wasen't good at it's core, that's not going to save the project.
Starfield, at it's very core, is an incredibly niche game. It does have it's audience, it's niche, but nomatter how much you fix and tweak it, it will never be anything but niche. It will never see the popularity of the Elder Scrolls and Fallout games.
Twenty minutes? Not worth.