Why didn't you baneling bust? Also, this is my playstyle, but I do it off 1-2 base. I deny their natural with aggro and tech/expand behind it. Counter what I see from my attack, as you did. The goal is to just keep them from being 2 base comfortable and always be a step ahead. You did that here but stopped their third instead of their second and you threw away a lot to do it, which is fine. Point this out because you used to say that was gg or bad or all in if you lost units early. It isn't, as you seen, it works if you do it right. Also, the whole "defenders advantage" wasn't showing up too well. Another thing I disagreed with once I heard the claims about it a long time ago. Most people you beat that do this style of play never tech/expand behind the attack, which is why they eventually lose once they run out of cash. Probably where you got the idea that it was bad in the first place. Its why I said, waaaay back when, "all ins are just attacks not perfected yet." Fine tune it, you can come back from a booboo. Everything works and is fair, minus cheating. All ins are just attacks needing work and cheese doesn't exist. Anyway, gg, hope to see more aggro.
the definition of an all in is attacking without the option of coming back if you do not do significant damage, obviously if you do significant damage you can come back you just wrote a paragraph to sound smart.
@@artemn1 "without the option of coming back." That is called suic!de, not an all in. If you don't do damage, you did it wrong. If writing a paragraph makes someone smart, yikes.
@@NinjaOnANinja i would say he is right, all in is giving everything, its an all in after all xD you cant comeback after because you either loose or win and put all your resource in the all in
@@BroccoliBrigardist that logic is based on bad players though. I am currently working on a video to sum all this stuff up. Had this talk about cheese already and all in is basically the same mentality. If you know better, the terms fall apart in meaning.
@@NinjaOnANinja okay so you are the judge of those meanings because you are good or something? :D in a cheese you can do stuff and tech up, cheesy is a little bit more of a wide term than all in, all in has no comeback but anyway who cares
The way you distracted his mutas and kept them on his side of the map was very impressive.
That connect at 10:30 was sweet
Parasitic Bombas
He gave up so easily
He was down a base the entire game
What’s the mix he was listening to?
BBC Radio 1 Essential Mix - ua-cam.com/video/7mM03G5kJTg/v-deo.html
soo deny bases and tech up to vipers and ultras
Why didn't you baneling bust?
Also, this is my playstyle, but I do it off 1-2 base. I deny their natural with aggro and tech/expand behind it. Counter what I see from my attack, as you did. The goal is to just keep them from being 2 base comfortable and always be a step ahead.
You did that here but stopped their third instead of their second and you threw away a lot to do it, which is fine. Point this out because you used to say that was gg or bad or all in if you lost units early. It isn't, as you seen, it works if you do it right. Also, the whole "defenders advantage" wasn't showing up too well. Another thing I disagreed with once I heard the claims about it a long time ago.
Most people you beat that do this style of play never tech/expand behind the attack, which is why they eventually lose once they run out of cash. Probably where you got the idea that it was bad in the first place. Its why I said, waaaay back when, "all ins are just attacks not perfected yet." Fine tune it, you can come back from a booboo.
Everything works and is fair, minus cheating. All ins are just attacks needing work and cheese doesn't exist.
Anyway, gg, hope to see more aggro.
the definition of an all in is attacking without the option of coming back if you do not do significant damage, obviously if you do significant damage you can come back you just wrote a paragraph to sound smart.
@@artemn1 "without the option of coming back." That is called suic!de, not an all in.
If you don't do damage, you did it wrong.
If writing a paragraph makes someone smart, yikes.
@@NinjaOnANinja i would say he is right, all in is giving everything, its an all in after all xD you cant comeback after because you either loose or win and put all your resource in the all in
@@BroccoliBrigardist that logic is based on bad players though.
I am currently working on a video to sum all this stuff up. Had this talk about cheese already and all in is basically the same mentality. If you know better, the terms fall apart in meaning.
@@NinjaOnANinja okay so you are the judge of those meanings because you are good or something? :D
in a cheese you can do stuff and tech up, cheesy is a little bit more of a wide term than all in, all in has no comeback
but anyway who cares