Defending Europe - what do we need Nato to do? | Sitrep podcast

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 лип 2024
  • 75 years since Nato was created to defend Europe, Sitrep asks what’s needed to do that job properly today.
    From organising hundreds of thousands of troops, to digging ditches and ensuring bridges can carry tanks, the challenges are explained by Professor Michael Clarke and Oana Lungescu, a former senior advisor to the Nato Secretary General.
    Part of the jigsaw is the new Alliance Reaction Force. Its commander, Lieutenant General Lorenzo D’Addario, tells Sitrep how the ARF plans to pack more punch more quickly.
    And former Royal Navy Commander Tom Sharpe chooses his ‘moment that made me’, when an engineering mistake flooded and threatened to sink his ship.
    Kate Gerbeau presents, with expert analysis from Professor Michael Clarke.
    00:00 - On Sitrep
    01:14 - Nato at 75 - A bigger team with a bigger job
    06:08 - The new Allied Reaction Force explained
    13:43 - Digging ditches and setting traps - defending Nato’s land
    26:02 - Defending Nato’s seas and skies
    31:18 - The moment that made me: A devastating flood
    #forcesnews #podcast #uk #navy #nato #europe #army
    Subscribe to Forces News: bit.ly/1OraazC
    Check out our website: www.forces.net/
    Facebook: / forcestv
    Instagram: forcesnews...
    X: / forcesnews

КОМЕНТАРІ • 38

  • @Вивсівідстій
    @Вивсівідстій 22 дні тому +13

    What Britain needs to do is stop cutting defence. A 75,000 strong army, 20 warship navy, an air force that can’t protect its own airspace without USAF assistance, doesn’t cut it.

    • @danandbaggyshow
      @danandbaggyshow 22 дні тому +2

      So true

    • @Wavy_Gravy
      @Wavy_Gravy 22 дні тому +1

      Your name sound oh so British, lmao.

    • @JuniorJuni070
      @JuniorJuni070 16 днів тому

      @@Wavy_Gravy
      doesn’t matter..
      europeans know warfare.
      british should know… warfare.
      75k… most standard land forces are well over a 150K manpower

  • @jej3451
    @jej3451 22 дні тому +2

    41:00 This guy is a bit confused about naval history. The first sea captain to circumnavigate the world was not Sir Francis Drake. It was the guy the Strait of Magellan was named after: Ferdinand Magellan.

    • @derekowens1817
      @derekowens1817 15 днів тому

      @@jej3451 wasn't Magellan, as he died en route in the Philippines.
      Juan Sebastian Elcano circumnavigated the globe, with the remnant of Magellan's expedition. D

    • @jej3451
      @jej3451 15 днів тому

      @@derekowens1817 I stand corrected

    • @derekowens1817
      @derekowens1817 15 днів тому

      @@jej3451 not at all. It's one of those widely held beliefs, and it was, of course Magellan's expedition which succeeded in the task. D

  • @veryhappychappy12
    @veryhappychappy12 22 дні тому +1

    In UK we need to restore the War Maintenance Reserve which has been decimated to levels previously unseen. Restore the RAF lift, Maritime Patrol and fighter capability to pre 1997 levels. Restore the Armoured Brigades to pre 2000 levels, particularly tanks. Restore our surface fleet to pre 1997 levels. An increase to 5% wouldn't scratch that.

    • @td6460
      @td6460 22 дні тому

      UK does not need an armoured force. Britain can do naval and airpower and a mechanized infantry core and that's plenty enough. Tanks don't offer anything over lighter vehicles but more cost.

  • @jimphillippi616
    @jimphillippi616 22 дні тому

    A delegation of authority is NOT the same as a "transfer of power". That distinction is VERY important!!
    In a delegation of authority, the body that delegated the authority STILL has the ultimate authority. In a transfer of power, the ultimate authority now resides with the body to which power was transferred.
    THIS is a delegation of authority NOT a transfer of power.

  • @8731Cordova
    @8731Cordova 22 дні тому +2

    Lol

  • @hourbee5535
    @hourbee5535 22 дні тому

    Conscription

  • @columbus7950
    @columbus7950 22 дні тому +5

    Prepare for a NATO in Trump 2.0. Raise the defence budget to 4.0% by 2030.
    Reform MoD procurement. Plug each other’s gaps. Build a proper ammunition resilience. Learn how to fight the “grey war”. Practice, practice, practice.

  • @user-xc4nu9lh6t
    @user-xc4nu9lh6t 18 днів тому

    Sleep and dream that nothing will happen

  • @jb5993
    @jb5993 21 день тому

    No to the UK in a EU army.

  • @richbattaglia5350
    @richbattaglia5350 17 днів тому

    Screams corruption.
    Keep it simple and have a plan for EU spending.

  • @JOHNDOE2K13
    @JOHNDOE2K13 22 дні тому

    How do you feel knowing your best commander isnt even currently in the military or deployed ima show the world when my time comes

  • @Ef554rgcc
    @Ef554rgcc 22 дні тому +1

    I'd like to see them learn from history and get on with defending themselves. Russia and their friends are biding their time as well.
    I see it as a game of spades.

  • @MrNeunauge
    @MrNeunauge 21 день тому

    What we need Nato really to do ... keep sending Vintage to Ukraine , start protecting the borders against illegal migration and start relocating those inside europe without legal status.

  • @SteveInsidious
    @SteveInsidious 22 дні тому +1

    😂😂😂

  • @goranmacakjovanovic1965
    @goranmacakjovanovic1965 22 дні тому +2

    Defence from ho??????

  • @basedglennuk
    @basedglennuk 20 днів тому

    NATO 🌈

  • @davidarchie2370
    @davidarchie2370 22 дні тому

    NATO,,. Ensure weaponry, as Russia via Putin is.. kdagPlymouthUK

  • @roblloyd1879
    @roblloyd1879 22 дні тому +5

    Stop poking the bear!!!!

  • @MrErnestsKarlsons
    @MrErnestsKarlsons 22 дні тому +1

    Need to stop existence of NATO and with all those money can make huge step in better future supporting economies of pure NATO members

  • @seanhayes9769
    @seanhayes9769 22 дні тому +1

    By some tanks ?
    Stop giving our reserve ammo to the Ukrainie
    Oh and wake up to the threats facing us……zzzzzzxzx