A good interviewer allows the interviewee to answer the questions that they ask. A bad interviewer keeps interrupting the interviewee. Just like a rude person will interrupt a person.
I give this a thumbs down because the woman was so busy interrupting to propound the "nothing to see here" notion, it robs all the worth of what the man is trying to say. The truth is given no platform. What a total tool this woman is. And you know she's there for that reason, because of her actions, and because she is a-typically unattractive. They know how she knows the tune....
That’s pretty easily explainable being that the bags were in a fucking explosion that more than likely would burn and blacked the bags they’d be covered in soot
At the end of the interview when Russ Baker mentions the far-fetched notion of Dzhokhar scrawling out a note on the side of the boat, this woman says "Well, we've seen pictures of that...we've seen pictures." What is she talking about? Does anyone know? Was she actually saying there were pictures of this alleged note released? If so--where? And when? I certainly have not seen a single picture of any alleged note, and I don't know a single person that has. Is this another case of people thinking they have seen something simply because they were told over and over again of it's existence, like in the case of the supposed "chilling" video of Dzhokhar dropping his backpack and slowly walking away before it exploded, or is she saying that she has actually SEEN these pictures with her own eyes? I wish Russ Baker would have had more time to call her out on that and get her to clarify.
I recently started researching all the conflicting accounts and weird stuff surrounding the narrative of this bombing. Disturbing to think of what might have actually gone on
I think it was an effort to frame Chetnans so that we can start a war with them since they have ties to the Russians. The US military is pushing propaganda against NK right now as we speak as they did with Iraq.
A few months after it II saw online images (pics or stills) of 'victtims' with wounds & bandages etc sitting around with paper cups & smoking, including some 'dead' ones', like extras relaxing whilst awaiting action on a film set. Which is exactly what the 'story' said they were! I couldn't persuade anyone to look/see for themselves the evidence it was staged - and now I can't find those images again. I only know what I saw & read. I am not American, I don't live in Ameriça & have no axe to grind. But that is what I saw. 🇮🇪
There were several videos online where you could see the laughable explosions (which didn´t fit to the reported injuries and body count), the fake injuries and all that stuff...all this has been wiped off from YT, or if those clips still exist, you´re just not able to find them, any more.
Truth is always stranger than fiction! Ask yourself this! Why so many version of events? Is it some strategy to make this a messy subject, in order to keep the conscious ones away from the scent?
It would be great to see the videos of the Tsarnaevs placing down their backpacks and leaving the scene but supposedly Dzhokhar's defense team has viewed them. As they are evidence they should not be discoled to the public yet. They are reputable attorneys so one would hope that if there is a good defense to the accusations they will present it.
There is no video footage of either of them placing down their backpack. There is also no courtroom footage of Tsarnaev admitting he was guilty. All we are shown are sketches of him and what he supposedly said. It's all hearsay
Jamie Fox and his colleague Levine-- made a 180 at northwestern in the late 90's. They went from being leading criminologists focussed on the social/economic models of crime-- they were making powerful work and people were paying attention-- lots of people-- it was changing the traditional approach to criminology and then very suddenly-- they turned on all of that. I think by the early 2000's one or both of them were making 150k to appear as expert witnesses to testify in court cases on those traditional psychological models of 'the criminal mind'. I assume there was more money to spend that way after the Clinton administration's inhuman crime bills. Any case that includes their input is highly suspicious.
Just create a floating timeline and story then it fits anywhere. If you’re a reporter just say it happened in thr green room with a candlestick by colonel mustard snd if that’s wrong? Chsnge it. Nobody’s paying attention. These brothers killed people but not Fanny. They liked Danny
A decade later and this guy is right. It just gets stranger.
A good interviewer allows the interviewee to answer the questions that they ask. A bad interviewer keeps interrupting the interviewee. Just like a rude person will interrupt a person.
Great job, Russ. It must be frustrating to converse with someone who is obviously insincere in her argument.
Why was Dave McGowan's expose on this removed from UA-cam? I think we all know the answer.
Do you know the title or somewhere else I might be able to find that video?
I’m reading McGowans Laurel Canyon book and took a break to find his BMB video… can’t find it anywhere.
Let the guy talk. What a lousy interviewer.
Bless her heart. She wants that new house really bad.
I give this a thumbs down because the woman was so busy interrupting to propound the "nothing to see here" notion, it robs all the worth of what the man is trying to say. The truth is given no platform.
What a total tool this woman is. And you know she's there for that reason, because of her actions, and because she is a-typically unattractive. They know how she knows the tune....
And 10 years later, the censorship has tightened even further. Surprised this video is still up in 2023...
Typical MSM hit job. Let the guest speak just long enough to make it look good and then talk over him and cut him off.
Why is the brothers carrying grey and white backpacks and the bombs being found in black backpacks never mentioned??? URBAN SHIELD FEMA TRAINING DRILL
That’s pretty easily explainable being that the bags were in a fucking explosion that more than likely would burn and blacked the bags they’d be covered in soot
@@johnscanlon2598 found one.
At the end of the interview when Russ Baker mentions the far-fetched notion of Dzhokhar scrawling out a note on the side of the boat, this woman says "Well, we've seen pictures of that...we've seen pictures." What is she talking about? Does anyone know? Was she actually saying there were pictures of this alleged note released? If so--where? And when? I certainly have not seen a single picture of any alleged note, and I don't know a single person that has. Is this another case of people thinking they have seen something simply because they were told over and over again of it's existence, like in the case of the supposed "chilling" video of Dzhokhar dropping his backpack and slowly walking away before it exploded, or is she saying that she has actually SEEN these pictures with her own eyes? I wish Russ Baker would have had more time to call her out on that and get her to clarify.
Me, too. I haven't seen any pictures of this supposed "confession" on the side of the boat. Has anyone else?
SNL did a video skit on it. Itcs called "I'm on a boat." Came out just before the event. Wonderful timing.
Great to see some real questions asked! This whole story stinks. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is innocent.
I recently started researching all the conflicting accounts and weird stuff surrounding the narrative of this bombing. Disturbing to think of what might have actually gone on
I think it was an effort to frame Chetnans so that we can start a war with them since they have ties to the Russians. The US military is pushing propaganda against NK right now as we speak as they did with Iraq.
You're kidding right? Had his damn car. And the innocent guy apologized to his victims. Dumb stuff.
I feel like Jahar was innocent and his brother forced him to do what they did or he probably didn't have a clue what was in the back packs
A few months after it II saw online images (pics or stills) of 'victtims' with wounds & bandages etc sitting around with paper cups & smoking, including some 'dead' ones', like extras relaxing whilst awaiting action on a film set. Which is exactly what the 'story' said they were! I couldn't persuade anyone to look/see for themselves the evidence it was staged - and now I can't find those images again. I only know what I saw & read. I am not American, I don't live in Ameriça & have no axe to grind. But that is what I saw. 🇮🇪
There were several videos online where you could see the laughable explosions (which didn´t fit to the reported injuries and body count), the fake injuries and all that stuff...all this has been wiped off from YT, or if those clips still exist, you´re just not able to find them, any more.
excellent work, Russ. Don't let the shills talk you down.
Emily Rooney - your chuckling throughout the interview outs you as a media shill. Shame on you.
scrutinize and question EVERY mainstream media story... because its a great propaganda machine...
Show the photo of dzhokhar and tamerlan leaving shell that is photo proof that contradicts Danny's final story .
Truth is always stranger than fiction!
Ask yourself this!
Why so many version of events? Is it some strategy to make this a messy subject, in order to keep the conscious ones away from the scent?
Not a good interviewer.
She wants to keep her job.
It would be great to see the videos of the Tsarnaevs placing down their backpacks and leaving the scene but supposedly Dzhokhar's defense team has viewed them. As they are evidence they should not be discoled to the public yet. They are reputable attorneys so one would hope that if there is a good defense to the accusations they will present it.
There is no video footage of either of them placing down their backpack. There is also no courtroom footage of Tsarnaev admitting he was guilty. All we are shown are sketches of him and what he supposedly said. It's all hearsay
She was awful
what would be his motive to screw up ? um, it's hard to keep lies straight.
When you lie, it's hard to keep up with all the lies. Danny, you got some splainin' to do
"Danny" = book of daniel
Naked man= symbolism of humanity's "shame"
Jamie Fox and his colleague Levine-- made a 180 at northwestern in the late 90's. They went from being leading criminologists focussed on the social/economic models of crime-- they were making powerful work and people were paying attention-- lots of people-- it was changing the traditional approach to criminology and then very suddenly-- they turned on all of that. I think by the early 2000's one or both of them were making 150k to appear as expert witnesses to testify in court cases on those traditional psychological models of 'the criminal mind'. I assume there was more money to spend that way after the Clinton administration's inhuman crime bills. Any case that includes their input is highly suspicious.
YT: Nullification is the Rightful Remedy google: Jury Nullification..... you hav ethe power in the courts.....learn it and use it
Police did not fire real bullets. They wanted to get him out
Just create a floating timeline and story then it fits anywhere. If you’re a reporter just say it happened in thr green room with a candlestick by colonel mustard snd if that’s wrong? Chsnge it. Nobody’s paying attention. These brothers killed people but not Fanny. They liked Danny
This guy is so insulting. Law enforcement got it right this time. Let's just be grateful those losers didn't kill more people.