daddy of WEF founder Klaus Martin Schwab is: Eugen Wilhelm Schwab (1899 - 1982), Director of the Escher Wyss mechanical factory, specializing in the manufacture of turbines and equipment for the Wehrmacht during WW2. his factory may have used slave labor under the Good N@zi, Al Speer...
@@JoseFernandez-qt8hm pretty much all German companies did work for the active government during that time. I'm always amazed that people pulling this out, Bayer, Pfizer, Volkswagen, Mercedes, Krupp, aso....
What's your opinion on the plethora of Tories who profiteered from the destruction of our country and miilions of people while they gaslit the public endlessly for years?
As BBB notes, this has been going on for some time, anyone who thinks AI has not been being used on the NHS data the last government sold to private industry is misleading themselves. It doesn't appear that Starmer is doing anything new, the last government sold us down the river yet again.
Cant wait to see all of Starmer's data available, like where he gets his money from and where he banks it, possibly how much tax he paid on his £107K of gifts. If he is classed as being medically sane etc.
Bill Gates and BlackRock have given him money recently, one to experiment on our cattle the other to buy up all the farm land, probably slot more than we will ever know.
@@vallytine You really need to expand your world view and thinking. Your narrow focus simply can't encapsulate the far broader issues at stake... that you don't even know who the WEF are and what they represent is mind-boggling! And frankly - dangerously ignorant. Sorry, I don't mean to offend but its true. Ignorance is not bliss is damn right dangerous.
@MrReubenTishkoff Have you opted out of organ donation after you have kicked the bucket, because that's how that works as well. They know people are too damn lazy to bother opting out and take advantage of it.
Yea, Ive said this, they do this on purpose because they compel YOU to make the effort and make you pay for it in effort to not be violated by default. Grotty cheeky stinking c**ts.
I cant access the NHS to get an appointment, but random face-less tech firms can access the NHS to impersonally mine it for all my most personal and intimate information, against my will. Classic modern Britain.
There was an option to opt out of that which had a cut off/deadline to terminate your details from being shared with other outside agencies think it twas 2022...i managed to opt out what that actual means and amounts to though are probably twisted knowing this lot.
@@Ezakhunt I opted out too and have since found out my information is being shared to lots of medical, research & govt bodies 😡. (by mistake they say) 😡
@tonyevic It's opt in that is the default. I personally don't mind if something good can come of all the research but I think all it will do is boost the profits of the pharmaceutical companies and health industry.
@@seanh1661Are we witnessing the inception of George Orwell's 1984? In time we will learn to love Big Brother. Remember this and keep it in your mind - We are the dead!
We are slowly going Chinese, the younger generation laugh but when the DVLA started selling your car details to dodgy parking companies I wasn't allowed to opt out. Why?
Stung recently for £60. You'd think a hotel would have sufficient parking, but part of it was private. Dark, early hours of morning, I was tired from driving. Were there signs? I don't know, I expect so, far away from home, then I received the notice some weeks later. Car park probably owned by the hotel anyway.
I might be wrong but a vote of no confidence can only be brought by MP's. So with Labours majority there will be no chance. I would imagine if the public had that power, we would go through 50 PM's a year.
You vote for the dictators you deserve. If we were a real democracy, we the people would have the power to remove a government we didn't like, want OR deserve. Instead we vote for those we like the sound of and then they do whatever the hell they want, regardless of the fact if it's ACTUALLY in their policy propaganda or not. Thus all democracies eventually descend into dictatorships during their time in office. With the Tories they were verging on the edge of a Corporate Autocracy. I'm not sure what the Labour Party are at the moment but it's very closely linked to Zionism. In fact going on Keith Lukewarmer's early Labour Party leadership acts of purging the left balance and Jewish party members informing on other Jewish party members for "Party Perks" - it's a mix of Zionism and Mesirah. A strange combination considering the historical antipodal origins of the two.
Vote of no confidence in the pm must be from liebour, if they win with a majority the pm can either opt for a national election or stand down and liebour find a replacement. If the whole of parliament do a no confidence in the government unlikely as liebour have a massive majority, then the pm would ask the king to dissolve the government and the people would be asked to vote again. Looks like four years to go then. 😢
This is where ‘ NHS’ money is going to! This and DEI jobs, NHS X , NHS corporate and Chief Executives, Trust Board salaries and perks. Oh, add in their teams of managers and PA’s
I’ve never been keen on the concept of AI. In the past there have been too many breaches with so called secure systems. This is just another government attempt to corral everybody into useful catagories to control every aspect of their lives. Another page out of the WEF hand book.
@lurdesdias3249 So long as it creates jobs and innovation in health care and if it creates profits and they can't avoid paying their fair share, I don't mind. Unfortunately we know that it wont happen in at least one of my three suggested benefits.
The NHS data sharing website says 'We never sell patient data or share it with insurance or marketing companies.' If it was found that this was not the case, they would be sued. As far as i am aware, there are zero allegations of them ever having breached patients data by sharing it with insurance or marketing companies. Saying that, BetterHelp said they weren't doing it and it turned out they were.
It’s no coincidence for anyone who’s made a hospital visit that they start to receive calls from litigation companies ‘about your accident’. Our data is likely sold every day on the internet by some IT geek who has access to NHS servers.
Blair has been an advocate for all this when he gave all our data to Google. They had to return it. This is to assist the transfer to American insurance companies about to take over the nhs when Starmer privatises it. In my opinion.
Thanks for bringing this sort of thing to our attention. It's difficult, as "an oldie", to accept everything that is going on around us. A lot of it is beyond my ageing brain - but it still concerns me for the like of our grandchildren. Keep up the good work!
I can't think of any circumstance where it would be necessary to provide researchers with data which isn't anonymised. Why would they need to know WHO the data is from? Very concerning.
Perhaps they don’t have ethnicity data, and names could be used to help identify with a degree of certainty, not saying that’s for sure, or i agree with it, but it could be a reason.
It is as impossible to "anonymise" data, as it is to generate a random number on a computer. As you're probably aware, there are only 6 degrees of separation that make you unique. Go create a new LinkedIn account. Tell it a couple of "anonymised" things about yourself. Within minutes it'll begin to identify who you really are. Using AI technology to un-anonymise us isn't that difficult.
@ Yes, but surely that information needs to be out there in the first place. I know it IS for most people, but if your very careful about your online security, and what information you give out to companies etc.
yes see this is the joke of it all.. theoretically human rights and social justice go hand in hand and they don't involve taking rights from others.. but .. i can see why people would say this.. something has gone incredibly 'wrong'.. i'm a social worker.. I'm so disgusted with my own profession as well. we are all ruled by lunatics. When i was younger people tried to talk me out of a degree "all brains and no commonsense'' and then as i hit forty i thought' no its okay'.. well now i'm back to i have a massive uni debt, i think the professors are totally detached and the syllabus have been so dumbed down to accommodate stupid people the world is going backwards.
Problem is that once your in the system, even if you share with a hospital because of an appointment, that data is then shared elsewhere, all smoke and mirrors.
My instant thought/fear on starmers announcement regarding AI was I Really really hope this has nothing to do with Rachel reaves new deal with china. I pray our government hasn't exposed us to the CCP like this.
It's just an assumption I don't want to trust my instincts because the idea of this is absolutely terrifying. I dunno about you guys but I've worked as a developer most of my working life and I truly understand the importance of the security and integrity of people's personal data. I repeat it is fucking terrifying.
Because Labour don't drag out enquiries like the Tories do. And in this case it's not even clear if she did anything wrong, whereas we can't say the same for the previous Tory ministers, some of whom were employed with full knowledge of them engaging in criminal behaviour.
I, for one, see this as the first step, the second, or third even, on the slippery slope to Big Brother. 1984, and other similar books of this genre, were written as a warning. Starmer, and his ilk view them as handbooks to obtain ever more control.
I am female but my hospital notes have me down as male twice. A lot of the information on my file was wrong. The old saying Garbage In, Garbage Out relies on correct data to extrapolate for good research. Any conclusions would therefore be questionable at best.
I and my children opted out in 2021 in writing delivered personally by hand to the receptionist (photographed) who said she'd never heard of selling data???? # I'm wide awake always have been, thanks to my dear old grandad who taught me well from a very young age!
The last desperate actions of an evil that can never win... Know This evil vs The Divine and Humanity, only ever one outcome... and May Gods Pure Love Bless Us All..
FYI, this is a huge data mining exercise which will be one of the core algorithms underpinning your social credit score pushed via a digital ID ultimately ending with a CBDC rolled out. You won't get a choice as we have seen with this government and the last as it'll just get approved and legislated.
Do you know about the following UK Government & Parliament Petition? Its title is: “Review how to turn the MHRA into a fully transparent, patient first regulator” _"We believe the The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) should be independently reviewed. This should cover approval and surveillance processes, funding & accountability. It should consider how to ensure the transparency of decisions, prioritisation of patient safety, and how to ensure there aren’t conflict of interests."_
The thoughts of the next 4 years under a Labour government literally fills me with massive anxiety & dread! I don’t know if they know exactly what they’re doing and are just plain evil or, are they actually just this incompetent?!
Your first instincts are correct, they know exactly what they're doing. 'Incompetent' people would make mistakes that harm THEMSELVES and benefit others, but Labour's policies ALWAYS give them more power and make them richer, whilst only WE suffer. Every single time! It's very VERY deliberate.
I thank the people who discover all the untoward situations that are going on. I opt out of everything these days. Google, mobile phone setup, i take the time every time to refuse cookies. literally everything.
wasn't there a contract, some time ago, where Google offered to manage all NHS data for them, where, in fact, Google did NOT have to abide with UK privacy laws ?
You have hit the nail on the head. It will start with your medical, soon, the Goverment will start to track your spending etc for taxation. The big issue, is we haven’t got enough power generation in the UK. This will means all our electricity cost keep rising. The AI data centres consume huge amounts of electricity and FRESH WATER. We don’t have loads of that, plus we need to work out how to disperse the heat.
People really need to understand that no allopathic medicine is ever designed to find CURES. It’s all designed to treat SYMPTOMS and ensure that you are a customer for life.
Opting out!!.....I opted out , moved GPs and the NHS lost my medical records ., I have complex health conditions and for 12 months 5 years of my most current medical history was in accessible, I've currently been waiting nearly 5 years for an appointment with a specialist due to moving , the data loss and having to start from scratch in a new area
I went straight to NHS Scotland website with a view to “opting out” too. sadly there is no NHS contact point for making such an inquiry. any suggestions?
They've been charged with various offences. Kind of inline with what the CPS said at the outset, they were waiting for the IOPC to conclude their investigation before making a charging decision.
Diagnosis relying on analytical & statistical data (in any field) is hugely negligent. One would assume it would be used along-side real time diagnostic procedures to build a true picture of the fault cause to accurately address the clients complaint however, with growing workloads & ultimately less time per case, I feel this correct approach may become less and less. I have seen corners being cut for many years (without Ai) resulting in treatments / rectifications akin to playing 'Diagnostic Darts'.
I remember opting out. And part of the opting out meant data would not shared with ANY department or partner services. That means the TRE service should not even have access to the data of those that opted out.
Hence the whole new encompass system we have here in N.Ireland not sure what the mainland hospital use....it all sounds wonderful....you can get the app on your phone so you can see your test results, appointments etc....but is it also an indirect form of a digital passport
I'll be reading further into this and then off to a solicitor to see if i can get a letter sent to my nhs forbidding them to share my information with anyone. If they do this then they should stop pretending there is such this as doctor patient confidentiality. Ai will be all through our bank accounts, in our cars, they'll be nothing they won't know. Mind you when you hear a few years ago regarding WhatsApp and priti patel saying there should be nothing sent electronically that the government can't see... different party same shit. Fuck this country is a hole.
Just opted out after searching for nhs opt out. Chose the second opt out option. Hopefully this will stop my gp surgery from constantly asking me to fill in stupid questionnaires, like what my ethnicity is. Never answered them, but found it funny that i was always prompted to answer before the ever shifting deadline ended.
On _Tony Blair Foundation for Global Change_ web site there is an article: _"Tony Blair and William Hague: The New AI Action Plan Offers the UK a Way to Get Back on Track"_
No explanation as to how I suppose? This is extremely unlikely, but then neither Blair or Hague have any notion as to the nature of AI. Basically it pulls consensus from the input data, which could be a serious snag to politics in general.
Having gone to the trouble of opting out of NHS data sharing, has my directive been ignored? I take umbrage with anything but compliance with my clear directive,
Starmer is working for the WEF.
That's his priority.
Not the British people.
🎯
Stakeholder Capitalist.
daddy of WEF founder Klaus Martin Schwab is: Eugen Wilhelm Schwab (1899 - 1982), Director of the Escher Wyss mechanical factory, specializing in the manufacture of turbines and equipment for the Wehrmacht during WW2. his factory may have used slave labor under the Good N@zi, Al Speer...
What’s Starmer got to do with this?
@@JoseFernandez-qt8hm
pretty much all German companies did work for the active government during that time.
I'm always amazed that people pulling this out, Bayer, Pfizer, Volkswagen, Mercedes, Krupp, aso....
Anything that Starmer shows an interest in should automatically alarm us!!!!
Tats how I feel about bill gates too
@@Cheky_gal Starmer's mate Bill?
What's your opinion on the plethora of Tories who profiteered from the destruction of our country and miilions of people while they gaslit the public endlessly for years?
If people can remember, this is the man who said he would support Davos rather than Westminster. He is working for the global elitists - not us.
Starmer?
@@PiOfficialyes Starmer
I think that us taken out of context
@johnsevern739 you think wrong 🤷
@@WEF-APOPHIS-2029 It would have helped if you had given a link to the item than tried to play the smart ar$e.
If Starmer is excited, it must be because he's going to get some more control or curtail our freedom.
Or a bung
Probably the latter🏴
We need more control over him, he's out of control
Stammer can dream on
Stammer selling us and personal information for scammers to see
I don't think we can trust the government or private business on this .
Can you trust them on anything else?
As BBB notes, this has been going on for some time, anyone who thinks AI has not been being used on the NHS data the last government sold to private industry is misleading themselves. It doesn't appear that Starmer is doing anything new, the last government sold us down the river yet again.
GOD AND THE UNIVERSE WATCHING THEM,WHILST THEY ARE WATCHING US , DONT WORRY HAVE FAITH.
THEY ARE WATCHING THEM
I’m amazed you trust the government on anything..:
It just gets worse every day
You haven't seen any thing yet 🙈
@@ruebencover5795 yep
Yeh and its scares the life out of me!!!
@@becky9334
Why?
I know. I think it's actually making us all depressed.
Cant wait to see all of Starmer's data available, like where he gets his money from and where he banks it, possibly how much tax he paid on his £107K of gifts. If he is classed as being medically sane etc.
If he can opt out of paying tax on his pension then we will not see anything on kweer starmalin
Bill Gates and BlackRock have given him money recently, one to experiment on our cattle the other to buy up all the farm land, probably slot more than we will ever know.
He pays no tax on his gifts, although he legally should, the IR don't bother to pursue it.
Doesn't need a sanity test nor an IQ test- he's a retarded looney😂
If insurance companies gain accessvto this type of data, it could lead to some people losing their health cover...
WEF government
What's a WEF?
@@vallytine World Economic Forum
@@amandaj2461 what does that mean in the context of labour AI maximalism?
@@vallytine You really need to expand your world view and thinking. Your narrow focus simply can't encapsulate the far broader issues at stake... that you don't even know who the WEF are and what they represent is mind-boggling! And frankly - dangerously ignorant. Sorry, I don't mean to offend but its true. Ignorance is not bliss is damn right dangerous.
@StevenWilkins-y9t That's exactly why I'm asking my friend! I want to learn about and understand perspectives unfamiliar to me.
We should be Opted Out by default and be allowed to choose to Opt In.
They did the same thing for organising donations
@MrReubenTishkoff
Have you opted out of organ donation after you have kicked the bucket, because that's how that works as well.
They know people are too damn lazy to bother opting out and take advantage of it.
@@wjf0ne You have to opt IN for organ donation in the UK.
Yea, Ive said this, they do this on purpose because they compel YOU to make the effort and make you pay for it in effort to not be violated by default. Grotty cheeky stinking c**ts.
@@wjf0neyes I did.
I cant access the NHS to get an appointment, but random face-less tech firms can access the NHS to impersonally mine it for all my most personal and intimate information, against my will.
Classic modern Britain.
And sell you stuff via that being passed onto other companies.
There was an option to opt out of that which had a cut off/deadline to terminate your details from being shared with other outside agencies think it twas 2022...i managed to opt out what that actual means and amounts to though are probably twisted knowing this lot.
@@Ezakhunt Felt the same, a P R exercise?
@@Ezakhunt I opted out too and have since found out my information is being shared to lots of medical, research & govt bodies 😡. (by mistake they say) 😡
Information is Worth Billions!
Never Ever Give ir to Them!
Protect Your Information at all Costs! It Belongs to you!
I hate living in a society, and sick to death where ‘opt in’ is the default…
They create the problem, people react to it then they give a solution you don't want or need.
The CON TROLL is getting out of control.
@tonyevic
It's opt in that is the default. I personally don't mind if something good can come of all the research but I think all it will do is boost the profits of the pharmaceutical companies and health industry.
@@wjf0ne 👍 of course it is, amended. Ta
@@seanh1661Are we witnessing the inception of George Orwell's 1984?
In time we will learn to love Big Brother.
Remember this and keep it in your mind - We are the dead!
We are slowly going Chinese, the younger generation laugh but when the DVLA started selling your car details to dodgy parking companies I wasn't allowed to opt out. Why?
Register your vehicle to someone else...
So that's the real reason to why Rachel went to China! I wonder what deal she made with them??
I just sold my car.
Stung recently for £60. You'd think a hotel would have sufficient parking, but part of it was private. Dark, early hours of morning, I was tired from driving. Were there signs? I don't know, I expect so, far away from home, then I received the notice some weeks later. Car park probably owned by the hotel anyway.
Because that's BS.
Hello Black Belt…could we have a vote of no confidence in labour?
You would need all the creeps that voted against a national enquiry to call it and vote against him I believe.
I might be wrong but a vote of no confidence can only be brought by MP's. So with Labours majority there will be no chance. I would imagine if the public had that power, we would go through 50 PM's a year.
No.dont do it again.
You vote for the dictators you deserve.
If we were a real democracy, we the people would have the power to remove a government we didn't like, want OR deserve.
Instead we vote for those we like the sound of and then they do whatever the hell they want, regardless of the fact if it's ACTUALLY in their policy propaganda or not. Thus all democracies eventually descend into dictatorships during their time in office. With the Tories they were verging on the edge of a Corporate Autocracy. I'm not sure what the Labour Party are at the moment but it's very closely linked to Zionism. In fact going on Keith Lukewarmer's early Labour Party leadership acts of purging the left balance and Jewish party members informing on other Jewish party members for "Party Perks" - it's a mix of Zionism and Mesirah. A strange combination considering the historical antipodal origins of the two.
Vote of no confidence in the pm must be from liebour, if they win with a majority the pm can either opt for a national election or stand down and liebour find a replacement. If the whole of parliament do a no confidence in the government unlikely as liebour have a massive majority, then the pm would ask the king to dissolve the government and the people would be asked to vote again. Looks like four years to go then. 😢
This is where ‘ NHS’ money is going to! This and DEI jobs, NHS X , NHS corporate and Chief Executives, Trust Board salaries and perks. Oh, add in their teams of managers and PA’s
MAJORITY IF NOT ALL NET ZERO PROJECTS HAVE TO BE HEAVILY SUBSIDISED 🤔
...and a whole load of penpushers working "from home" in the Bahamas 😂😮😂😮😂😮😂
These people never wanted privacy and liberty from day one.
I’ve never been keen on the concept of AI. In the past there have been too many breaches with so called secure systems. This is just another government attempt to corral everybody into useful catagories to control every aspect of their lives. Another page out of the WEF hand book.
UK never had first amendment.
@@n0b0d1-rc6dz We could do with the second amendment too
Socialists never do.
Unless its his privacy, then he uses the courts to get an injunction.
This Starmer bloke is power hungry and cold cold hearted.
It's the lawyer in him
What do you expect he defends Jimmy Saville in 2009 and pedos in 2024
@@gam9063 aye, he's another level, the globalists have never openly weilded power so brazenly, we got your 6 brother 🇮🇪🙏🇬🇧
Look at his eyes, no light in them, just pure darkness
Reptilian.
When the government says trust us or trusted, we had better run a mile.
Unless we can stop all these crimes I'm starting to not want to know about them. Every day seems like a personal violation.
yeah mate, i feel you, im starting to just do nothing because its so depressing, we know whats coming the control etc and its just making us miserable
@kerryprice-u2v exactly this.😪
No guys. There is still hope. Trump. !
Fight the good fight, do not go quietly into the night...
Speak truth, keep speaking.
@@russellcrosby8175 You are right, do not go quietly, but Trump is not going to save us. We ourselves are going to do this by keeping on speaking.
Insurance companies and banks will salivate over that AI info....
@lurdesdias3249
So long as it creates jobs and innovation in health care and if it creates profits and they can't avoid paying their fair share, I don't mind.
Unfortunately we know that it wont happen in at least one of my three suggested benefits.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The NHS data sharing website says 'We never sell patient data or share it with insurance or marketing companies.'
If it was found that this was not the case, they would be sued. As far as i am aware, there are zero allegations of them ever having breached patients data by sharing it with insurance or marketing companies.
Saying that, BetterHelp said they weren't doing it and it turned out they were.
It’s no coincidence for anyone who’s made a hospital visit that they start to receive calls from litigation companies ‘about your accident’. Our data is likely sold every day on the internet by some IT geek who has access to NHS servers.
@@MadDog_Rules Never! You mean to say that N H S managers were selling information about patients on, but they said they would not do so
Blair has been an advocate for all this when he gave all our data to Google. They had to return it. This is to assist the transfer to American insurance companies about to take over the nhs when Starmer privatises it. In my opinion.
It’s been said for decades that we will end up having to have health insurance
Hancock did but yes I agree Blair has pushed it for years
@@DitchUK only because he will make big bucks from it same as the rest of them
Thanks for bringing this sort of thing to our attention. It's difficult, as "an oldie", to accept everything that is going on around us. A lot of it is beyond my ageing brain - but it still concerns me for the like of our grandchildren. Keep up the good work!
It should concern you, your 70yrs of data has value, not simply for research but for selling to companies.
"Trust me I'm a Doctor." Yeh right! Regards
What's a Doctor ! ?
I'm from the government, I'm here to help....
Trust me I am "AI" ...
Doctoring the Nation.
I can't think of any circumstance where it would be necessary to provide researchers with data which isn't anonymised. Why would they need to know WHO the data is from? Very concerning.
Perhaps they don’t have ethnicity data, and names could be used to help identify with a degree of certainty, not saying that’s for sure, or i agree with it, but it could be a reason.
It is as impossible to "anonymise" data, as it is to generate a random number on a computer. As you're probably aware, there are only 6 degrees of separation that make you unique. Go create a new LinkedIn account. Tell it a couple of "anonymised" things about yourself. Within minutes it'll begin to identify who you really are. Using AI technology to un-anonymise us isn't that difficult.
@ Yes, but surely that information needs to be out there in the first place. I know it IS for most people, but if your very careful about your online security, and what information you give out to companies etc.
My dad was a lefty barrister.
I see the danger of voting in a human rights lawyer.
He'll certainly take away your rights.
It's all he thinks about.
yes see this is the joke of it all.. theoretically human rights and social justice go hand in hand and they don't involve taking rights from others.. but .. i can see why people would say this.. something has gone incredibly 'wrong'.. i'm a social worker.. I'm so disgusted with my own profession as well. we are all ruled by lunatics. When i was younger people tried to talk me out of a degree "all brains and no commonsense'' and then as i hit forty i thought' no its okay'.. well now i'm back to i have a massive uni debt, i think the professors are totally detached and the syllabus have been so dumbed down to accommodate stupid people the world is going backwards.
Despite OPTING OUT of the NHS data issue My Information/Data was still used even after I received an apology from the NHS.
Problem is that once your in the system, even if you share with a hospital because of an appointment, that data is then shared elsewhere, all smoke and mirrors.
@R-bobo Not all hospitals use the same systems to be able to share data.
@@briantyler689 agreed, however it'll probably not be long until they jump on the bandwagon.
How did you find out it was used
There is no reason for anyone else to have your medical data apart from doctors treating you.
Thanks Dan for all you do. No consent for this to happen
My local hospital gave google access to 1.6 million patient year's ago.
Whatever.. the anti corruption minister have fled 😂
Government is becoming hollowed out
And because she was involved in corruption, and government seeking to hide it
My instant thought/fear on starmers announcement regarding AI was I Really really hope this has nothing to do with Rachel reaves new deal with china. I pray our government hasn't exposed us to the CCP like this.
Of course they have. It's what they do.
💯 they have
It's just an assumption I don't want to trust my instincts because the idea of this is absolutely terrifying. I dunno about you guys but I've worked as a developer most of my working life and I truly understand the importance of the security and integrity of people's personal data. I repeat it is fucking terrifying.
My thoughts exactly.. why did she go to China….
XI is a stakeholder and China is the model
Yep the Anti corruption minister has resigned 👏👏👏 but our SLIME MINISTER ,thanked her and says ,you've done nothing wrong 😉, 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
He still accepted her resignation.
Prime sinister
And sell our info for huge amounts of cash. They are louts Thankyou for exposing again 💐
And TwoLips Siddiq has gone
Because Labour don't drag out enquiries like the Tories do. And in this case it's not even clear if she did anything wrong, whereas we can't say the same for the previous Tory ministers, some of whom were employed with full knowledge of them engaging in criminal behaviour.
@@mhtbfecsq1ahh a labour loon
She just misread her job title..Auntie Corruption Minister.
…it’s a cultural thing…🤗
Corruption with her as the anti corruption minister
More availability of personal data then more access to criminality. Criminals are rubbing their hands in glee😢
I, for one, see this as the first step, the second, or third even, on the slippery slope to Big Brother. 1984, and other similar books of this genre, were written as a warning. Starmer, and his ilk view them as handbooks to obtain ever more control.
I am female but my hospital notes have me down as male twice. A lot of the information on my file was wrong. The old saying Garbage In, Garbage Out relies on correct data to extrapolate for good research. Any conclusions would therefore be questionable at best.
Same I was down as diabetic, two of us same name . Think her details were put on my notes.
When records are summarised mistakes do happen.
If you have enough data, it is not possible to anonymize data. This is well know amongst those who data analysis.
BBB, Spot on !
I and my children opted out in 2021 in writing delivered personally by hand to the receptionist (photographed) who said she'd never heard of selling data???? # I'm wide awake always have been, thanks to my dear old grandad who taught me well from a very young age!
Did you opt out of using your organs too?
*donating
The last desperate actions of an evil that can never win... Know This evil vs The Divine and Humanity, only ever one outcome... and May Gods Pure Love Bless Us All..
Amen 🙌🙏 sweet brother
Another excellent report. Thanks
We knew eventually this would come. AI will be used to control every facet of the human being.
FYI, this is a huge data mining exercise which will be one of the core algorithms underpinning your social credit score pushed via a digital ID ultimately ending with a CBDC rolled out.
You won't get a choice as we have seen with this government and the last as it'll just get approved and legislated.
I recently uncovered corruption/deception in my local labour run council and my mp blocked me and looks like it's been covered up.. any advice please
Vote Reform
Or move
Disclose, as allegedly perhapsq, works on most comments.
Move along. The hivemind will take you down and you won't see it coming. Been there, done that, got the T-Shirt.
Gather a file. Contact and hand it to the local media and the BBB
I don't trust many people Daniel, but I trust you. Thanks for shining light on this situation.
Nah, he's already said he's a Barista.
I couldn't trust him to do anything except make me a cup of coffee.
I would vote for Daniel if he stood for election. Very impressed with his perspective and attitude..
You'd trust a Lawyer?
@@257ian Ha, that raised a smile from the gloom.
@@257ian ? A lawyer is a ‘job’
@@crystalawen I didn't say a lawyer wasn't a job, did I?
I said would you trust one!?
Do you know about the following UK Government & Parliament Petition? Its title is:
“Review how to turn the MHRA into a fully transparent, patient first regulator”
_"We believe the The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) should be independently reviewed. This should cover approval and surveillance processes, funding & accountability. It should consider how to ensure the transparency of decisions, prioritisation of patient safety, and how to ensure there aren’t conflict of interests."_
Thanks so much for alerting us all
Hello I'm AI and from the Government. I'm here to help....
🤪
Labour's AI generated advert the other day was a roaring success
😂😂😂😂😂 that's true plagiarised animal farm idea
Im surprised we haven't heard more about that video
@@invisibleman1459 indeed
@@user-Katie019 it was the music... That's why they cancelled it.
@@russellcrosby8175
You mean the lyrics.
Absolutely disgusting.
A certain group of Germans in the 1930’s and ‘40’s would have absolutely loved to have had AI available to them. ‘nough said!
Someone's personality is very like those evil people.
I think some had descendents. I think Klaus had a father in the nazis I think.
The thoughts of the next 4 years under a Labour government literally fills me with massive anxiety & dread! I don’t know if they know exactly what they’re doing and are just plain evil or, are they actually just this incompetent?!
Your first instincts are correct, they know exactly what they're doing. 'Incompetent' people would make mistakes that harm THEMSELVES and benefit others, but Labour's policies ALWAYS give them more power and make them richer, whilst only WE suffer. Every single time! It's very VERY deliberate.
I thank the people who discover all the untoward situations that are going on. I opt out of everything these days. Google, mobile phone setup, i take the time every time to refuse cookies. literally everything.
Further, given the energy demands of data storage centres, net zero becomes suicidal…
wasn't there a contract, some time ago, where Google offered to manage all NHS data for them, where, in fact, Google did NOT have to abide with UK privacy laws ?
I handed in my opt out letter to my doctors some time ago in 2021. How do i know they actioned it and opted me out, is there anyway to check?
put themselves above country. a re-run of "Yes, Minister" episode 4, "Big Brother"
Sir Kier wants to control and watch all of us!
He is doing a great job on behalf of those whose interests he represents. Sadly that is not the law abiding UK tax payer
Can’t we opt out again. This government really are the worst kind of humans 😡
Opting "out" was outrageous as i knew nothing about it until it was done... Is there any way to opt out now because i feel blindsided and conned?...
You have hit the nail on the head. It will start with your medical, soon, the Goverment will start to track your spending etc for taxation.
The big issue, is we haven’t got enough power generation in the UK. This will means all our electricity cost keep rising. The AI data centres consume huge amounts of electricity and FRESH WATER. We don’t have loads of that, plus we need to work out how to disperse the heat.
People really need to understand that no allopathic medicine is ever designed to find CURES. It’s all designed to treat SYMPTOMS and ensure that you are a customer for life.
There is no profit from a healthy patient
Exactly.
The talk Larry Fink did about depopulation and Ai was very revelling (WEF channel )
Opting out!!.....I opted out , moved GPs and the NHS lost my medical records ., I have complex health conditions and for 12 months 5 years of my most current medical history was in accessible, I've currently been waiting nearly 5 years for an appointment with a specialist due to moving , the data loss and having to start from scratch in a new area
Probably "lost " on purpose. Sorry to hear about your problem . Either incompetence or deliberately moves from them .
Wine rack looks useful. Bookshelf also. Excellent combination.
Opted out already in advance ,we knew this was coming
Ditto! opted out in 2020
Same here
I went straight to NHS Scotland website with a view to “opting out” too. sadly there is no NHS contact point for making such an inquiry. any suggestions?
I've now opted out. Thanks for the heads up.
Where has data protection gone?
I’m in Wales and did opt out but, have since discovered that I am on the database.
Thanks ❤🎉❤
What is happening with regards to the 3 violent thugs who assaulted police officers at Manchester Airport...Any news?
They've been charged with various offences.
Kind of inline with what the CPS said at the outset, they were waiting for the IOPC to conclude their investigation before making a charging decision.
Oi Starmer NO.
Absolutely no frigging way, my data is my personal identity, get lost, not going to share, and no smart phone either!
Good example! 😂 google tried to 'translate' your post!!
@BacchanalLady1 🤣🤣
If you've already opted out of the data share, would they still be allowed to add your date to the ai computer for research?
Am convinced someone is pulling the strings on Starmer and their not Christian British.
Seriously love you, Dan.
Thank you so much.
Find the Uniparty behind the Uniparties.
No more state control
Thanks for letting us know this scary little detail. I’ve just gone online and opted out for me and my kids 👍🏻
Where do we go?
…don’t forget, if AI is utilised as intended, 85% of civil servants become redundant!
Social credit system where your whole life is monitored by AI coming to a town near you.
Diagnosis relying on analytical & statistical data (in any field) is hugely negligent. One would assume it would be used along-side real time diagnostic procedures to build a true picture of the fault cause to accurately address the clients complaint however, with growing workloads & ultimately less time per case, I feel this correct approach may become less and less. I have seen corners being cut for many years (without Ai) resulting in treatments / rectifications akin to playing 'Diagnostic Darts'.
is it a coincidence that we just received a generous offer from the nhs to have a whole bunch of tests done to establish our medical status ?
I remember opting out. And part of the opting out meant data would not shared with ANY department or partner services. That means the TRE service should not even have access to the data of those that opted out.
Boom 💥
Thank you Daniel. 👍👍👍
I opted out this morning you will need your NHS number.
Thank you
Where do we do that?
just opted out too
@@TheB1nary - search for "nhs national data opt out"
@@TheB1naryon your online Drs account.. where you request meds or an appointment x
Hence the whole new encompass system we have here in N.Ireland not sure what the mainland hospital use....it all sounds wonderful....you can get the app on your phone so you can see your test results, appointments etc....but is it also an indirect form of a digital passport
Give Keir the spear ?
AND the IK GDPR rules will be changed to permit the NHS to have access to, use at its discretion and sell off the data
I'll be reading further into this and then off to a solicitor to see if i can get a letter sent to my nhs forbidding them to share my information with anyone. If they do this then they should stop pretending there is such this as doctor patient confidentiality. Ai will be all through our bank accounts, in our cars, they'll be nothing they won't know. Mind you when you hear a few years ago regarding WhatsApp and priti patel saying there should be nothing sent electronically that the government can't see... different party same shit. Fuck this country is a hole.
Just opted out after searching for nhs opt out. Chose the second opt out option. Hopefully this will stop my gp surgery from constantly asking me to fill in stupid questionnaires, like what my ethnicity is. Never answered them, but found it funny that i was always prompted to answer before the ever shifting deadline ended.
Can i opt out of the UK ?
Thanks for the alert.
Anything in this vein should be by default opt IN
Thank you.
So much for your records being confidential. Is anything we were told actually true?
A big NO
Absolutely outrageous.
I and my husband opted out of the medical stuff a few years back. knew what they would do, rogish lot
👍🏻
My parents never believed in n h s. We always used the private system
The private system relies heavily on the NHS.
It's one of the sectors I work in.
On _Tony Blair Foundation for Global Change_ web site there is an article: _"Tony Blair and William Hague: The New AI Action Plan Offers the UK a Way to Get Back on Track"_
It won't of course 😂
No explanation as to how I suppose? This is extremely unlikely, but then neither Blair or Hague have any notion as to the nature of AI. Basically it pulls consensus from the input data, which could be a serious snag to politics in general.
Having gone to the trouble of opting out of NHS data sharing, has my directive been ignored? I take umbrage with anything but compliance with my clear directive,