Tim is the only guy of your three who actually understands that there is a huge difference between math and physics. The physical universe constrains math. Not the other way around. It boggles the mind to hear a physicist say something like "The strength of gravity is controlled by the gravitational constant." The truth is that the magnitude of the gravitational constant is determined by the structure and content of the universe. In just the same way as Scientology exploits ignorance, there are physicists who do the same.
This is why I like to study math because it is not burdened with emerging into the physical realm out of its own abstraction. Physics on the other hand needs to hold this emergence as its motivating force and ultimate responsibility.
@@alephnull7410 & Jack, you might really like a video in releasing on Halloween, "the actual, physical, reason why time slows at the speed of light". Bookmark me for later this week.
@christian babis By changing your perception about it. Example: you break a bone and expect some time before it can heal. However, someone else may break a same bone and heal themself instantaneously. The difference would be that deep down inside you you believe it should take time before you can heal anything in your body, while the other person does not hold the same idea and belief about _(linear)_ time within their ability to heal themself.
You've been creating the perception that you are traveling thru time _(that's what time is....perception which we experience)_ and thusly creating that reality for yourself where you experience aging, and such other things relative to your belief and perception about linear time, which also includes the idea and belief of cause & effect.
Absolutely. But the first law is inverted in the enclosed region of a black hole. In fact negative temperature is abundant inside a black hole. This means that as you add heat to the system it gets colder and one particle of this negative temperature would boil all the galaxies in the universe.
I honestly just had an epiphany while watching this. It doesn't really make any sense to say that time has a direction at all. To reverse time is a fallacy. What we are experiencing as time is a movement of objects and in our perspective, to reverse time would be the perfect reversal of the movement of objects in the exact coordination with which they arrived here from where they came.. so really, time isn't about time at all. It's about the movement of objects in relation to each other. We notice the year as a rotation of the earth around the sun. Several of those and you've got a century. We notice a minute as a rotation of a watch hand around the dial. If we turn the dial backwards does that reverse time? If we made the earth rotate opposite around the sun would time be reversed then? If we could make everyone age backwards would that be time reversal? If time seemed to be moving in reverse and everything was going backwards would that be time reversal? Or would we still experience it as time moving forward but everything is just happening differently.. I think time is really just our experience of objects and their movement and tracking them and following their patterns. To say time could be reversed is pretty much nonsense. Even if it was reversed, time is not happening in reverse. You always experience it as moving forward, it's just an alternate movement of objects. If time does start moving in reverse that throws out the idea of free will definitely as now time is on a track going backwards.. does this mean free will is impossible just the idea that if time started moving backwards it would be on a track? Or could we effect the past in reverse? Does it mean it's on a track moving forward?
The time never actually comes to a stop it forms closed loops. However these closed loops are extremely short.. they are within the planck length. They are the basis for extra dimensions in string theory.
I think of time as a plane. So, therefore it can travel in all directions, hence different "time lines", but it may also be fluid where theres one line that can be transformed into something else at any given point and since all we have are our memories, we would never realize it because our memories would also conform to the time line as it changes. Also,it may just be us that tries to understand time by saying theres a reverse or forward. OR maybe Im putting too much thought into it.
I am very happy to hear when he said'No, i disgree, time is time, space is space'. i hate ppl say the word 'spacetime', as if they know what it is. Time is the vibraration of the 3D web of the universe, it is the cause of the change of everything in the universe, with this change, we feel time. with this high frequency trembling of the web, the smallest scale becomes wierd, jiggling, jumping -- the quantum world.
Public comments on this topic are funny. I like some of the “philosophers” of physics, like Prof. Mauldin, for being transparent & common-sensical as well as knowledgeable. Another such colleague, Dean Rickles, provided maybe my favorite interview of all I’ve seen in this series when addressing the question, “Why is there Something rather than Nothing?”
APPARANTLY IF A DOZEN OR MORE PEOPLE FART DIRECTLY IN YOUR FACE ALL BACK TO BACK, ITS POSSIBLE THAT PERSON CAN GO BACK IN TIME, BUT ONLY TO GET REVENGE ON THE POOPIE HEADS THAT FARTED IN YOUR FACE. ITS THE LAW OF QUANTUM FACE FARTING.
I don't know if this guy is right, but I love that he defends the plain sense of things. Fussing over exotic theories can take us away from the awe that surrounds us at every moment.
Sadly, he's probably right. Perhaps the best reason to believe time travel isn't possible other than the conspicuous deficiency of tourists from the future, is that if time travel was possible, probably there would be no Fermi Paradox because every planet in the universe would be colonized, or at least every one that didn't have an enormous impending catastrophe (you wouldn't colonize a planet around a star that's about to explode for instance), they'd have probably colonized the universe, not just the observable universe but the whole universe, by 100 million years after the big bang if you could go back as early as desired.
First scientist I've heard say, what I always thought, that Time and Space is not absolutely linked. Time is Time, Space is Space. Keep it simple people.
Paul, you might really like a video in releasing on Halloween, "the actual, physical, reason why time slows at the speed of light". Bookmark me for later this week!
But in the center of a black hole, spacetime is warped so drastically that space and time swap and the center of a black hole becomes the future rather than a spot in space. If time and space were really that independent, there wouldn't be examples like that where they interact so fluidly. He never said they weren't linked. He said they're not exactly the same thing. He, in fact, nodded twice, agreeing with the concept of spacetime.
Time travel to future is possible It’s already been done Iss astronauts who come down to earth are a miniscule fraction of a second ‘younger’ than the rest of earth Now in the future with even faster propulsion etc they can come back to earth having aged 6 months while earthlings aged 60 yrs for example
The only way I see time travel as being possible is by reversing the flow (vectors) of particles and their physical interactions so that everything in existence interacts backwards to a certain cosmic particles-orientation (with the time traveler being the only particles separate from this rewind). But this doesn't mean that we're actually time traveling - as we'd still be in the same universe with the current now, but in a different (old) arrangement of atoms. Such a feat seems impossible, though. You'd have to know the exact position and momentum of every atom in the universe, and ACTUALLY have the technology to reverse them. On the other hand, if the universe is a simulation, all you'd need is access to the code. This would require you to get outside the simulation, though, because it would only be able to be done from the outside.
Exactly! Brad, you might really like a video in releasing on Halloween, "the actual, physical, reason why time slows at the speed of light". Bookmark me for later this week.
Dark matter is wormholes. We can’t see them, but they are detected because of the materials traveling within the structures. This is due to the secondary detection responds of the time delays.
It takes sunlight (the present travelling at speed of light) eight minutes to travel to earth; the present sunlight is eight minutes behind when it hits earth; the earth is eight minutes in the future and we are always living eight minutes in the future.
If time travel were possible we would have had visitors from the future. As some physicists are beginning to understand, there is no "thing" called time. It is a construct of the mind.
Time has no direction. Change has direction and always forward. We confuse it as direction of time. Change is irreversible. No past, no future. The Universe is changing at Present line giving us a false sense of past and future. Past is record. Future is next change state of present line with elapse of time. So time is elapsing, not moving forward or backward.
When you think about it, all records of the past could be false. And so maybe there is no true record.. no true past.. maybe the past is open to interpretation just like the future.. think how many times you argued with people over something that happened in the past. What is the truth?
If some equations allow for impossible solutions, then there are only three possibilities: 1. The criterion on which we select plausible and unfeasible solutions is arbitrary, or 2. The equations are wrong, or 3. Both 1 and 2 simultaneously.
No, that's not true at all. For instance, it is well known that if there are 2 cosmic strings (1 dimensional gravitational singularities, an infinitely long string rather than a point as in a black hole - it's a different type of singularity than a black hole) that pass each other by at high speed and you flew figure 8s around them fast enough in the right direction, you'd go back in time. That is neither 1 nor 2 so not 3. The problem there is that cosmic strings likely don't exist.
Maths is a tool to understand reality and quantify, but is not necessarily the nature itself. I could put some examples from my field, engineering. Sometimes, I have discovered empirical models which works really well in predicting an output variable, based on several inputs. I used PLS method (partial least square), which is a multivariate regression method. It essentially works by projecting input variables that have a high correlation into a vectorial space with less variables (=less dimensions), therefore reducing the dimensionality of the input. The point here is that it is doing the same projection with the output. Hence, I have worked with examples where input dimensions have been reduced from tens to 3 or four, but the single output variable has been transformed into a four dimension vector. It works really well with 99% of certainty, but it is clear that it is only a mathematical apparatus since it makes sense with the input, but the nature of the output is one dimension. In this example, maths are not describing the reality, but are very useful.
I feel if we could travel back in time, it would be like viewing a movie. Do we want to travel back in time to change it? Perhaps it depends on our intentions. Probability: there to change or to observe? It depends on that moment....
Look, this business of "reversing the arrow of time" would accomplish nothing even if we could do it. The way I see it only one of two things could happen. Either a) everything continues to evolve, just as it evolves now, only in the direction of decreasing time coordinate. There would be no difference - it's the same evolution. That amounts to nothing but a "labeling change." Or, b) everything begins evolving backward. If that happens, how would we know? How do we know it's NOT happening on a regular basis? Our memories would unwind - we'd re-experience the same set of instants we previously experienced, except we wouldn't know it because the memories we had of it "later" in time would have devolved out. Time might reverse all the time - our progress through time may always be two steps forward one step back, but we still only have one continuous stream of actual experiences that create the memories we have at some point in time. In neither case do we get anything other than exactly what we're getting. All this is is people who have watched too much science fiction having fantasies.
About the possibility of time travel into the past my heart says yes and my brain says no. In the sense that I would love so fucking much for it to be possible but I also realize it most probably isn't.
Time travel may be encoded in our DNA. The DNA interacts with the universal consiouness to allow us to travel through the reallity matrix of time and space. But somehow our DNA's ability to propagate through the conscious time andspace is locked.
Panagiotis Papadimitriou i understood that basically time is in our Dna as in our body made the concept and is something that we were born, made or kind of blueprinted to understand. If our brain didnt work a certain way time would seem different we made up the concept of time because of how we think and our minds understand it. Thats what i got from it I might be far off
When something travel at speed of light no time is experienced and stays in the present; when the sun gives off sunlight it is the present and when light hits the earth feels like the present.
The only way to reverse the direction of time is to entangle every particle in the universe and then set off the process of the big bang and make sure that all the features of the emerging universe remain constant. This is impossible as time itself does not begin at the big bang but evolves from the spacetime structure. It is an organic and dynamic force and hints at infinite parallel universes. Each one closed from the others.
Are we living in the present, or the future? Maybe time feels like its moving forward because we are moving from the past to the future, and the present is an infinitesimally small slice of time on the way from past to future.
Travel in time also seems to necessitate travel in space. Even if it were possible, there's no point in travelling in time if you find yourself out of reach of anything you actually know. The point of this almost primal urge to travel in time is to experience events in the past or future that have meaning. To travel into the past only to be unable to participate in that time frame would be futile. Which is a shame considering the enormous effort and energy that would be involved.
If space is expanding faster than the speed the speed of light, and the earth, sun and galaxy along with space, would this mean the universe is travelling backward in time?
I still don't understand what people mean by saying mechanics can run "in either direction in time". That's just nonsense. If a machine turns X's into Y's, and can be run backward to turn Y's into X's, what on Earth does that have to do with time??
Understanding time is simple. The SOL is the refreshment of reality at the Planck length. The Past is a record, the future is potential. All that is relevant is 'now'.
The fact is i can locate a point in space, that corresponds to an exact time , at that location, i cannot factor the past locations of space/time by a single particle? If i try to send a particle to travel back in time, there has to be an event location, of spacetime, for the returning particle to interact with, thus you cannot determine past present from future present? Betwixt any two points in space, there is but one time, betwixt any two points in time there is one space?
7:26 - Space and time are NOT the same thing. That sign difference in the metric signature MATTERS. It makes a huge difference. We've just found a way to carry space and time along together in a math framework - that's all. They are not "equivalent." That's only "meaningful" in science fiction.
Robert and Tim , I do not know non locality well enough , I am still studying it , but is there some aspect of time travel happening in non - locality?
It could be that earth is travelling backward in time, that if we travel at speed of light the backward travel in time is slowed to the present, while reality is travelling towards the future through quantum or somehow; giving the feeling that we are moving from past to future. In a sense time travel could be going on to past, present and future all the time as the regular natural course of things.
Not only is time travel in both directions possible, it is actually going on. Look it up. It is self centered to say that something is impossible merely because you do not know how to do it. Time travel requires transdimensional technology, which has been kept secret from the general public.
Time is the truth about reality, but truth is entire universe as a whole and from all existing points of view at once, at given moment. We better stick to math, shut up and calculate, we will never understand time even if we could experience everything.
If you look at the clock for time and also have travel experience, it doesn't mean you understand the physics of matter and frequencies. Anyone who's trying to explain this subject using word "time" are on the wrong path right from the beginning.
He didn't consider quantum mechanics which proves the existence of multiple realities simultatiously existing at the same time and can onlye be collapsed by observation.
Quantum mechanics proves no such thing. That's just one interpretation of the mathematical formalism. Maudlin is well aware of that possible model. In any case, time travel is no more possible with Many Worlds than without it.
Hearing that under the terms of quantum physics, apparently if time-travel were possible, it’d be something more akin to *Avengers* than *Looper*. Was interesting to me; I confess I thought time-travel and inter-dimensional travel weren’t the same thing. I always assumed that it would be possible to change the past. So basically, I watched and beloved too many movies.
You travel in time everytime you climb in your car and drive to the store, I would have thought these two would mention that. Very few nuggets of gold in this tiresome discussion.
You are *not* traveling *in* time... you are always in the present moment, and time is your measurement of how everything has changed relationships. You use countable cycling events to essentially document these changes. You never find yourself in anything but the present moment.
@@samuelmendoza9561 Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity tells us that the passage of Time is not a constant, it does not pass by at a constant rate. The passage of time is influenced by (1) the speed that you are traveling and (2) Gravity. If you are moving, the rate at which your time passes by is SLOWER than the rate at which time passes by for someone standing still. Obviously at the speed of an automobile the difference is very small, but it IS different. But if you travel at near the speed of light, your time passes by much more slowly than a person standing still. If you were in a rocket ship traveling to Alpha Centauri (a neighboring star of our sun) it would take you approximately 4 years to get there (as measured by your wristwatch) because Alpha Centauri is 4.243 light years away. If you turned around when you got there and flew back to earth at the same speed the total elapsed time for you would be about 8 years. But, when you got back to earth you'd find that THEIR time had elapsed by several hundred years. You not only traveled in space, you also traveled in time! Time is also altered by gravity. The higher the gravity, the slower time passes by. Scientists have actually measured the difference in the passage of time for an Atomic clock located at the top of the Empire State Building compared to an Atomic Clock at ground level in the Empire State Building-because the clock at the top is farther away from the center of the earth and is thereby experiencing lower gravity than the clock at ground level. The passage of time is not a constant, it is influenced by velocity and by gravity. Einstein proved that.
I have done time Travel in future , Really I have many experiences of Time Travel in future, it's not a hypothetical... If you interested in me then I will be share my experience and secret of time travel...
I guess Mr Tim didn't hear about Dr. Ronald Mallet. He not only know time travel back in time is possible and he solved Einstein equation for that, but he even has a blue print for first time machine. At least practically we will be able to send information back in time to earliest point which will be when the device was first powered up. The machine involves circular lasers that in the middle will deform time and space by swirling due to circulating beam of light, likely very high power special lasers and also the circumference must be sufficiently small else the power needed grows exponentially. So first time travel to back will be sending information. His idea he discovered slowing Einstein equation is based on idea that if gravity can affect matter and light can affect gravity, then light can affect time. So it's funny I know this and the scientist not. I guess they are l are so deep digged in their own tranches they become to a degree blind to what others are doing. Time travel into future is nothing special. It's done every time you move relative to something, just you would have to move very close to speed of light to truly see it. Else the slowing of your time relative to others is negligible small. And traveling back it time out there is space you could try black holes entering under a special angle so you come out before you entered. Else practical we need to wait to Dr. Mallet to design a working model and we need to be content by simply just sending at best information back in time which also can also be send back only to the point machine will be make and powered on and no further. So a lot of limitations, but that is where we are at least which is far further then Mr. Tom claim we can't even travel back in time. Pls.
@Donald Piniach I have to confess... This is way over my head. But very fun mental gymnastics. Which I did before. Before the future. But I guess I'll have to go back to the past, stop at the present moment, which really is the past but for the one reading this, the past, present and the future. I guess only time will tell. If its not too slow?!? 🤔 😅But time is a great song from pink floyd. Made in the past 😊
I don't like such certainty that time travel isn't possible any more than I would like such certainty that time travel is possible. Experimentation is where its at. We might never be able to prove time travel isn't possible, we might never be able to devise an experiment that shuts down once and for all every possible theorized method of time travel. But we can devise experiments for specific theorized methods of time travel that we may one day actually be able to build and run, one theorized method at a time. At which point we might be able to disprove a specific theorized method of time travel, but always leaving open the possibility that there may be methods that could work that haven't even been theorized or that are as of yet untested. A better format for arguing the subject would be to discuss specific proposed methods individually. To just say time travel isn't possible is to not only dismiss current theorized methods, which there may well be reason to dismiss, but also time travelling methods that have yet to even have been theorized. Some scientist who is trying to come up w/a method of time travel, even in his failure, might accidentally discover something else useful completely unrelated to that goal. Many failed experiments have led to great discoveries unrelated to the stated goals of said experiments after all. Until it is known one way or the other, via experimentation that is, it can still be profitable to have less certainty on the subject. If we think we already know the answer, then we'll stop searching for the answer and that would be sad, even if it turned out after all the searching that time travel wasn't possible - the failed search for the possibility could still be fruitful. Or to put it another way, lets not poo poo the people eager to prove time travel a possibility, even if we foresee failure in their future, for even if they are wrong, their failed attempts at proving so could lead to beneficial results for us all, or who knows, maybe they could even succeed.
He just said there is an opposite direction, which makes a symmetrical cone, of time. Then he states, he as no clue what going backwards in time would mean. In effect, he is saying there are two Universes going forward in time from one point. Is this implying the other Universe would be back in time? I wouldn't think so from what he said. I still fail to see how that denies a timeless beginning. If space & time comes in at a point, what is beyond that point? If the point is infinite, but timeless, why did it happen at that specific moment in time. Why not twice as long ago, or last week? He deflected the question with his timeless time question. He knew what the statement was intended to question. Still, if I put them on a graph, with the future to the left, he is saying both Universes would be headed left. Therefore, their common origin is incidental, not a description of a time before the Big Bang for us. So their might be two Universes, but the other Universe might also be like time travel.
This is how I see it. The universe is not ruled by time. Rather, time is ruiled by the universe. Why? Simply because we created time. Therefore, it is no surprise that the universe has many different spots that will be able to dilate the time on your clock.
APPARANTLY IF A DOZEN OR MORE PEOPLE FART DIRECTLY IN YOUR FACE ALL BACK TO BACK, ITS POSSIBLE THAT PERSON CAN GO BACK IN TIME, BUT ONLY TO GET REVENGE ON THE POOPIE HEADS THAT FARTED IN YOUR FACE. ITS THE LAW OF QUANTUM FACE FARTING.
kvnmcinturff1 nice... but excuse me, how has the universe expanded and cooled and given rise to sentient life that needed millennia to evolve to the point where you could type a statement like that on the internet?!
@@GriuGriu64 nonsense. familiar attempt to shoehorn quantum physics into vedantic idealism... still nonsense. so you're saying modern science is still far away from grasping what ancient yogis knew? nonsense.
@@GriuGriu64 i am familiar with the argument. he rebuttal is simple: 1) as far as we know, quantum physics has absolutely zero implications for our experience of everyday reality at the macro level. 2) quantum physics is not a justification for any forms of religious or magical thinking. it has likewise zero implications on kitsch spiritual assertions about reality, consciousness and the divine. in short, the two have simply nothing to do with one another -but i understand the appeal of the argument because it has been promoted and sold to the new age demographic incredibly successfully since the 80's but peaking at total saturation about 10 years ago...
I think in order in for time travel to be possible, reality would conditions we which we don't know of yet, from our current understandings and assumptions, no it's not possible
Technically you travel to the past when you travel at extremely fast velocities, it's just not your past, it's someone else's, I dont think the concept of traveling back to a point in time is that far fetched, just as space seems to be transverseable, time should also be since the two are intertwined
How can you go back or forward of your life by time travel because at every moments of past and future of your life there is a version of you already. So if you go back 10 years, you will only see what your 10 years younger version was doing. you can only watch but can not be active because you are already there. Two same person can not exist at the same time. So time travel is not possible.
😂😂😂😂 lol.. seems like you speak like Parrot, but have no wisdom... Two same person present can exist at same time, only if somebody is not observing us. (Both person) at a same time!! You need to learn quantum physics..😂😂😂😂😂
Time travel to the future is quite real and even to the past but u could never go back before the tech or phenomenon is invented on a practical lvl is a diff story
OK, so you hold events that invites time travelers to go back in time and attend, and no one shows up. So, what? Why would they? Why give away time travel to those not worthy to understand it? Huh?
..I believe it could be possible to look into the future but not move your person to the future...I think that time is infused with geometry on a macro level but on a quantum level time is separated from the geometry...and I believe we are also infused with the geometry on a macro level, but on a fundamental level, say in the neurons of our brain,.... not...
*Anything* within the laws of physics is possible in this universe...but in 13.8 billion years since the big bang began there has been *_no_* sign of an advanced civilization but us. *We are alone, folks....* 💕 ☮ 🌎 🌌
We only search a small amount of the universe, there likely are intelligence specie like us on difference planet, we has to keep on looking through all those radio wave
Time is erased as time passes ..memories of time exist but not the time itself ..you cant actually recreate the time that existed...so as future time has not been created by movement of the sun and moon ..only one could actually be able to control time would be the creater of time itself ..the clock maker you could say ..we would only have to step out of our existance in time to realize what time is ..we are a blink in existance in infinity ..now say we could jump into alternate universes and if they exist then we could assume we move into it and live out what we want to happen ...my theory
You are so right. In other words: Tme is just an illusion, it doesnt exist, never existed and never will, Time is just physical stuff changing positions. Days are not passing becasue of time and Sun is not rising up every day because of time ...
Isn’t time the entropy of the universe and the local here and now is part of observing a relative localized part of this entropy? Relatively renders a universal moment of now as a meaningless endeavor to speculate.
R A Feller understood, but subtracting the observer out, eliminating the “you” that you mentioned, it is important to notice that the way “time”, or the entropy of the universe unfolds is different in different locations such as near a black hole or the “experience” of a photon, which is without time. We may be arguing different points but I’m just drawing attention to the fact that what we consider time is just entropy and relativity is important to consider when speaking about the “now” of any one experience.
unless i got a brain tumor or something...when we understand dreams and consciousness the answer to this will get more grey. maybe even change in some ways. even if consciousness is physical maybe dreams are not. maybe by manipulating one you can sorta steer the other.
So, it's not traversable in the normal sense of travel. There's no way to move in a direction of negative time. But we can go to a lesser positive time. There was never a time when time did not exist and, there is no place that space does not exist.
Tim is the only guy of your three who actually understands that there is a huge difference between math and physics. The physical universe constrains math. Not the other way around. It boggles the mind to hear a physicist say something like "The strength of gravity is controlled by the gravitational constant." The truth is that the magnitude of the gravitational constant is determined by the structure and content of the universe.
In just the same way as Scientology exploits ignorance, there are physicists who do the same.
This is why I like to study math because it is not burdened with emerging into the physical realm out of its own abstraction. Physics on the other hand needs to hold this emergence as its motivating force and ultimate responsibility.
Physics is a pretty shoddy discipline overall..
See you in the past, loser 🤙
@@alephnull7410 & Jack, you might really like a video in releasing on Halloween, "the actual, physical, reason why time slows at the speed of light". Bookmark me for later this week.
I have been traveling forward in time, into the future for 54 years.😎
52 years
50
24 i think i'm in the past compare to you guys lol
@christian babis By changing your perception about it. Example: you break a bone and expect some time before it can heal. However, someone else may break a same bone and heal themself instantaneously. The difference would be that deep down inside you you believe it should take time before you can heal anything in your body, while the other person does not hold the same idea and belief about _(linear)_ time within their ability to heal themself.
You've been creating the perception that you are traveling thru time _(that's what time is....perception which we experience)_ and thusly creating that reality for yourself where you experience aging, and such other things relative to your belief and perception about linear time, which also includes the idea and belief of cause & effect.
I have been travelling backward in time. Unfortunately I can't remember the future.
How
The First Law of Thermodynamics prevent time travel.
On the other hand, Time Dilation by speed or gravity is allowed by relativity.
Absolutely. But the first law is inverted in the enclosed region of a black hole. In fact negative temperature is abundant inside a black hole. This means that as you add heat to the system it gets colder and one particle of this negative temperature would boil all the galaxies in the universe.
Will your not a physicist so i don't see how your possibly know that time travel can be prevented
I wish I could go back in time to wish that I could go forward in time to my initial wish.
DID IT!
I honestly just had an epiphany while watching this. It doesn't really make any sense to say that time has a direction at all. To reverse time is a fallacy. What we are experiencing as time is a movement of objects and in our perspective, to reverse time would be the perfect reversal of the movement of objects in the exact coordination with which they arrived here from where they came.. so really, time isn't about time at all. It's about the movement of objects in relation to each other. We notice the year as a rotation of the earth around the sun. Several of those and you've got a century. We notice a minute as a rotation of a watch hand around the dial. If we turn the dial backwards does that reverse time? If we made the earth rotate opposite around the sun would time be reversed then? If we could make everyone age backwards would that be time reversal? If time seemed to be moving in reverse and everything was going backwards would that be time reversal? Or would we still experience it as time moving forward but everything is just happening differently.. I think time is really just our experience of objects and their movement and tracking them and following their patterns. To say time could be reversed is pretty much nonsense. Even if it was reversed, time is not happening in reverse. You always experience it as moving forward, it's just an alternate movement of objects. If time does start moving in reverse that throws out the idea of free will definitely as now time is on a track going backwards.. does this mean free will is impossible just the idea that if time started moving backwards it would be on a track? Or could we effect the past in reverse? Does it mean it's on a track moving forward?
I like the perspective you put this to!
The time never actually comes to a stop it forms closed loops. However these closed loops are extremely short.. they are within the planck length. They are the basis for extra dimensions in string theory.
I think of time as a plane. So, therefore it can travel in all directions, hence different "time lines", but it may also be fluid where theres one line that can be transformed into something else at any given point and since all we have are our memories, we would never realize it because our memories would also conform to the time line as it changes. Also,it may just be us that tries to understand time by saying theres a reverse or forward. OR maybe Im putting too much thought into it.
Time is the moving image of eternity said Plato.
I hope time travel isn't possible. I don't want my far future descendants looking back to see me wackin it all the time.
It's Too late Granddad!! I've seen you wack off in all forms of times
This guy^
The person 3 replies above me is crazy
Foley Yayo 😂😂😂😂😂
It's August 8th my birthday ....I traveled back in time to watch this video , which was published July 9th
I am very happy to hear when he said'No, i disgree, time is time, space is space'.
i hate ppl say the word 'spacetime', as if they know what it is.
Time is the vibraration of the 3D web of the universe, it is the cause of the change of everything in the universe, with this change, we feel time. with this high frequency trembling of the web, the smallest scale becomes wierd, jiggling, jumping -- the quantum world.
Time is simply change relative to change. Time travel is pure BS.
Public comments on this topic are funny. I like some of the “philosophers” of physics, like Prof. Mauldin, for being transparent & common-sensical as well as knowledgeable.
Another such colleague, Dean Rickles, provided maybe my favorite interview of all I’ve seen in this series when addressing the question, “Why is there Something rather than Nothing?”
APPARANTLY IF A DOZEN OR MORE PEOPLE FART DIRECTLY IN YOUR FACE ALL BACK TO BACK, ITS POSSIBLE THAT PERSON CAN GO BACK IN TIME, BUT ONLY TO GET REVENGE ON THE POOPIE HEADS THAT FARTED IN YOUR FACE. ITS THE LAW OF QUANTUM FACE FARTING.
I don't know if this guy is right, but I love that he defends the plain sense of things. Fussing over exotic theories can take us away from the awe that surrounds us at every moment.
I love listening to super smart people talk. #clueless I always feel smarter.
Sadly, he's probably right. Perhaps the best reason to believe time travel isn't possible other than the conspicuous deficiency of tourists from the future, is that if time travel was possible, probably there would be no Fermi Paradox because every planet in the universe would be colonized, or at least every one that didn't have an enormous impending catastrophe (you wouldn't colonize a planet around a star that's about to explode for instance), they'd have probably colonized the universe, not just the observable universe but the whole universe, by 100 million years after the big bang if you could go back as early as desired.
First scientist I've heard say, what I always thought, that Time and Space is not absolutely linked. Time is Time, Space is Space. Keep it simple people.
Why should it be simple? Do you think the universe exists and operates with your level of understanding in mind?
@@b.m.c.2601 It certainly doesn't operate with your understanding in mind.
Paul, you might really like a video in releasing on Halloween, "the actual, physical, reason why time slows at the speed of light". Bookmark me for later this week!
But in the center of a black hole, spacetime is warped so drastically that space and time swap and the center of a black hole becomes the future rather than a spot in space. If time and space were really that independent, there wouldn't be examples like that where they interact so fluidly. He never said they weren't linked. He said they're not exactly the same thing. He, in fact, nodded twice, agreeing with the concept of spacetime.
I was late for a meeting AGAIN, argh. This is like the third time this month I failed to hear my hourglass stop.
Time travel to future is possible
It’s already been done
Iss astronauts who come down to earth are a miniscule fraction of a second ‘younger’ than the rest of earth
Now in the future with even faster propulsion etc they can come back to earth having aged 6 months while earthlings aged 60 yrs for example
Eli T wha- my 12 year old mine is blown and confused but also consumed on what your saying if that make sense
Never mind the consumer I mean interested
I don't know what they said but i agree
The only way I see time travel as being possible is by reversing the flow (vectors) of particles and their physical interactions so that everything in existence interacts backwards to a certain cosmic particles-orientation (with the time traveler being the only particles separate from this rewind). But this doesn't mean that we're actually time traveling - as we'd still be in the same universe with the current now, but in a different (old) arrangement of atoms. Such a feat seems impossible, though.
You'd have to know the exact position and momentum of every atom in the universe, and ACTUALLY have the technology to reverse them. On the other hand, if the universe is a simulation, all you'd need is access to the code. This would require you to get outside the simulation, though, because it would only be able to be done from the outside.
Exactly! Brad, you might really like a video in releasing on Halloween, "the actual, physical, reason why time slows at the speed of light". Bookmark me for later this week.
Who else watching this on WA (Worl Archives) year 2364?
The best answer I ever heard
Dark matter is wormholes. We can’t see them, but they are detected because of the materials traveling within the structures. This is due to the secondary detection responds of the time delays.
It takes sunlight (the present travelling at speed of light) eight minutes to travel to earth; the present sunlight is eight minutes behind when it hits earth; the earth is eight minutes in the future and we are always living eight minutes in the future.
If time travel were possible we would have had visitors from the future. As some physicists are beginning to understand, there is no "thing" called time. It is a construct of the mind.
DONT GIVE UP ON TIME TRAVEL
Agreed
When I went to bed last night it was yesterday. When I woke up this morning it was a new day so I’ve time travelled from yesterday
If you COULD travel back in time, it would start a different path for the future. You could never return to the exact same future you came from.
Time has no direction. Change has direction and always forward. We confuse it as direction of time. Change is irreversible.
No past, no future. The Universe is changing at Present line giving us a false sense of past and future. Past is record. Future is next change state of present line with elapse of time. So time is elapsing, not moving forward or backward.
100% wrong
When you think about it, all records of the past could be false. And so maybe there is no true record.. no true past.. maybe the past is open to interpretation just like the future.. think how many times you argued with people over something that happened in the past. What is the truth?
If some equations allow for impossible solutions, then there are only three possibilities:
1. The criterion on which we select plausible and unfeasible solutions is arbitrary, or
2. The equations are wrong, or
3. Both 1 and 2 simultaneously.
No, that's not true at all. For instance, it is well known that if there are 2 cosmic strings (1 dimensional gravitational singularities, an infinitely long string rather than a point as in a black hole - it's a different type of singularity than a black hole) that pass each other by at high speed and you flew figure 8s around them fast enough in the right direction, you'd go back in time. That is neither 1 nor 2 so not 3. The problem there is that cosmic strings likely don't exist.
@@medexamtoolscom I'm not entirely sure that I understand your explanation, and its relevance.
You can’t. There are too many realities and you would never get back home. You also can’t make the whole universe move backwards through time either.
Maths is a tool to understand reality and quantify, but is not necessarily the nature itself. I could put some examples from my field, engineering. Sometimes, I have discovered empirical models which works really well in predicting an output variable, based on several inputs. I used PLS method (partial least square), which is a multivariate regression method. It essentially works by projecting input variables that have a high correlation into a vectorial space with less variables (=less dimensions), therefore reducing the dimensionality of the input. The point here is that it is doing the same projection with the output. Hence, I have worked with examples where input dimensions have been reduced from tens to 3 or four, but the single output variable has been transformed into a four dimension vector. It works really well with 99% of certainty, but it is clear that it is only a mathematical apparatus since it makes sense with the input, but the nature of the output is one dimension. In this example, maths are not describing the reality, but are very useful.
I feel if we could travel back in time, it would be like viewing a movie. Do we want to travel back in time to change it? Perhaps it depends on our intentions. Probability: there to change or to observe? It depends on that moment....
The very act of travelling back to a particular point in time would change the future. This notion of "being careful not to disturb future" is silly.
Robert Kuhn is living in a fantasy world.. He's like a kids looking for bedtime stories
Look, this business of "reversing the arrow of time" would accomplish nothing even if we could do it. The way I see it only one of two things could happen. Either a) everything continues to evolve, just as it evolves now, only in the direction of decreasing time coordinate. There would be no difference - it's the same evolution. That amounts to nothing but a "labeling change." Or, b) everything begins evolving backward. If that happens, how would we know? How do we know it's NOT happening on a regular basis? Our memories would unwind - we'd re-experience the same set of instants we previously experienced, except we wouldn't know it because the memories we had of it "later" in time would have devolved out. Time might reverse all the time - our progress through time may always be two steps forward one step back, but we still only have one continuous stream of actual experiences that create the memories we have at some point in time. In neither case do we get anything other than exactly what we're getting.
All this is is people who have watched too much science fiction having fantasies.
It's better to let people answer question...
About the possibility of time travel into the past my heart says yes and my brain says no. In the sense that I would love so fucking much for it to be possible but I also realize it most probably isn't.
Me too. I would like to travel back time
Currently traveling through time at a rate of 1 second per second.
Thank you so much for this channel. It is frickin’ fantastic. :)
Serendipity defies science. But, to someone who has experienced it, it is as real as gravity. It is also time independent in it's mechansim.
Time travel may be encoded in our DNA.
The DNA interacts with the universal consiouness to allow us to travel through the reallity matrix of time and space.
But somehow our DNA's ability to propagate through the conscious time andspace is locked.
Panagiotis Papadimitriou i understood that basically time is in our Dna as in our body made the concept and is something that we were born, made or kind of blueprinted to understand. If our brain didnt work a certain way time would seem different we made up the concept of time because of how we think and our minds understand it. Thats what i got from it I might be far off
When something travel at speed of light no time is experienced and stays in the present; when the sun gives off sunlight it is the present and when light hits the earth feels like the present.
Time travel is possible but we don’t have access to it at this time. Our theory of relativity and quantum mechanics is just too primitive..........
Understanding and quantum mechanics are oxymorons.
The only way to reverse the direction of time is to entangle every particle in the universe and then set off the process of the big bang and make sure that all the features of the emerging universe remain constant. This is impossible as time itself does not begin at the big bang but evolves from the spacetime structure. It is an organic and dynamic force and hints at infinite parallel universes. Each one closed from the others.
Are we living in the present, or the future? Maybe time feels like its moving forward because we are moving from the past to the future, and the present is an infinitesimally small slice of time on the way from past to future.
I wish I could go back in time back to her
Travel in time also seems to necessitate travel in space. Even if it were possible, there's no point in travelling in time if you find yourself out of reach of anything you actually know. The point of this almost primal urge to travel in time is to experience events in the past or future that have meaning. To travel into the past only to be unable to participate in that time frame would be futile. Which is a shame considering the enormous effort and energy that would be involved.
If space is expanding faster than the speed the speed of light, and the earth, sun and galaxy along with space, would this mean the universe is travelling backward in time?
I still don't understand what people mean by saying mechanics can run "in either direction in time". That's just nonsense. If a machine turns X's into Y's, and can be run backward to turn Y's into X's, what on Earth does that have to do with time??
Understanding time is simple. The SOL is the refreshment of reality at the Planck length. The Past is a record, the future is potential. All that is relevant is 'now'.
So basically, your comment is no longer relative? :P
@@CrazyBrick30 Now is always now. So it is always relevant. Relativity is subjective.
The fact is i can locate a point in space, that corresponds to an exact time , at that location, i cannot factor the past locations of space/time by a single particle? If i try to send a particle to travel back in time, there has to be an event location, of spacetime, for the returning particle to interact with, thus you cannot determine past present from future present? Betwixt any two points in space, there is but one time, betwixt any two points in time there is one space?
7:26 - Space and time are NOT the same thing. That sign difference in the metric signature MATTERS. It makes a huge difference. We've just found a way to carry space and time along together in a math framework - that's all. They are not "equivalent." That's only "meaningful" in science fiction.
Yes
Didn't Kurt Godel design a time machine? But the catch was you needed a god like technology and a ring the size of the solar system.
Robert and Tim , I do not know non locality well enough , I am still studying it , but is there some aspect of time travel happening in non - locality?
It could be that earth is travelling backward in time, that if we travel at speed of light the backward travel in time is slowed to the present, while reality is travelling towards the future through quantum or somehow; giving the feeling that we are moving from past to future. In a sense time travel could be going on to past, present and future all the time as the regular natural course of things.
*I GOT ABSOLUTELY NOTHING OUT OF THIS LUNCH TABLE CONVERSATION. 🤔*
Andre Jones time travel isn’t possible.
@@FoleyYayo *I HOPE NOT I WOULD LOVE TO GO BACK IN TIME AND BULLY MYSELF WHEN I WAS A KID*
Scientists in the19th century were convinced that heavier than air flying machines couldn't fly. ..
Not only is time travel in both directions possible, it is actually going on. Look it up. It is self centered to say that something is impossible merely because you do not know how to do it. Time travel requires transdimensional technology, which has been kept secret from the general public.
Back in the padded cell for you, I think.
Time is the truth about reality, but truth is entire universe as a whole and from all existing points of view at once, at given moment. We better stick to math, shut up and calculate, we will never understand time even if we could experience everything.
If you look at the clock for time and also have travel experience, it doesn't mean you understand the physics of matter and frequencies. Anyone who's trying to explain this subject using word "time" are on the wrong path right from the beginning.
He didn't consider quantum mechanics which proves the existence of multiple realities simultatiously existing at the same time and can onlye be collapsed by observation.
not exactly lol
Quantum mechanics proves no such thing. That's just one interpretation of the mathematical formalism. Maudlin is well aware of that possible model. In any case, time travel is no more possible with Many Worlds than without it.
I wish I want to travel back in time back to my age of 6 years old.
Hearing that under the terms of quantum physics, apparently if time-travel were possible, it’d be something more akin to *Avengers* than *Looper*. Was interesting to me; I confess I thought time-travel and inter-dimensional travel weren’t the same thing. I always assumed that it would be possible to change the past. So basically, I watched and beloved too many movies.
We travel through time at the speed of light (minus our motion through the unviverse) that'spretty cool.
If you calculate all the motion of all objects which your nestled within. Your moving way faster then light
I just stumbles upon your channel and i love it!
You travel in time everytime you climb in your car and drive to the store, I would have thought these two would mention that. Very few nuggets of gold in this tiresome discussion.
How ? Can u explain me please?! Please
lol c'mon. You remain in your own timeline. There's nothing profound in your comment.
You are *not* traveling *in* time... you are always in the present moment, and time is your measurement of how everything has changed relationships. You use countable cycling events to essentially document these changes. You never find yourself in anything but the present moment.
jiohdi 1960 hence why meditation calms you down, less counting
@@samuelmendoza9561 Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity tells us that the passage of Time is not a constant, it does not pass by at a constant rate. The passage of time is influenced by (1) the speed that you are traveling and (2) Gravity. If you are moving, the rate at which your time passes by is SLOWER than the rate at which time passes by for someone standing still. Obviously at the speed of an automobile the difference is very small, but it IS different. But if you travel at near the speed of light, your time passes by much more slowly than a person standing still. If you were in a rocket ship traveling to Alpha Centauri (a neighboring star of our sun) it would take you approximately 4 years to get there (as measured by your wristwatch) because Alpha Centauri is 4.243 light years away. If you turned around when you got there and flew back to earth at the same speed the total elapsed time for you would be about 8 years. But, when you got back to earth you'd find that THEIR time had elapsed by several hundred years. You not only traveled in space, you also traveled in time!
Time is also altered by gravity. The higher the gravity, the slower time passes by. Scientists have actually measured the difference in the passage of time for an Atomic clock located at the top of the Empire State Building compared to an Atomic Clock at ground level in the Empire State Building-because the clock at the top is farther away from the center of the earth and is thereby experiencing lower gravity than the clock at ground level.
The passage of time is not a constant, it is influenced by velocity and by gravity. Einstein proved that.
Of course it is possible ! I do it all the time...
I have done time Travel in future , Really I have many experiences of Time Travel in future, it's not a hypothetical... If you interested in me then I will be share my experience and secret of time travel...
Glad to see some new content.
I guess Mr Tim didn't hear about Dr. Ronald Mallet. He not only know time travel back in time is possible and he solved Einstein equation for that, but he even has a blue print for first time machine. At least practically we will be able to send information back in time to earliest point which will be when the device was first powered up. The machine involves circular lasers that in the middle will deform time and space by swirling due to circulating beam of light, likely very high power special lasers and also the circumference must be sufficiently small else the power needed grows exponentially. So first time travel to back will be sending information. His idea he discovered slowing Einstein equation is based on idea that if gravity can affect matter and light can affect gravity, then light can affect time. So it's funny I know this and the scientist not. I guess they are l are so deep digged in their own tranches they become to a degree blind to what others are doing. Time travel into future is nothing special. It's done every time you move relative to something, just you would have to move very close to speed of light to truly see it. Else the slowing of your time relative to others is negligible small. And traveling back it time out there is space you could try black holes entering under a special angle so you come out before you entered. Else practical we need to wait to Dr. Mallet to design a working model and we need to be content by simply just sending at best information back in time which also can also be send back only to the point machine will be make and powered on and no further. So a lot of limitations, but that is where we are at least which is far further then Mr. Tom claim we can't even travel back in time. Pls.
I WANT to go back to 31st October 2009!
The time you read this I'm already in the future... Hehehe
heavy meddle read this a year in the future haha
@Donald Piniach that was in the past. What I'm writing now is in... The past😊
@Donald Piniach I have to confess... This is way over my head. But very fun mental gymnastics. Which I did before. Before the future. But I guess I'll have to go back to the past, stop at the present moment, which really is the past but for the one reading this, the past, present and the future. I guess only time will tell. If its not too slow?!? 🤔 😅But time is a great song from pink floyd. Made in the past 😊
I don't like such certainty that time travel isn't possible any more than I would like such certainty that time travel is possible.
Experimentation is where its at.
We might never be able to prove time travel isn't possible, we might never be able to devise an experiment that shuts down once and for all every possible theorized method of time travel. But we can devise experiments for specific theorized methods of time travel that we may one day actually be able to build and run, one theorized method at a time. At which point we might be able to disprove a specific theorized method of time travel, but always leaving open the possibility that there may be methods that could work that haven't even been theorized or that are as of yet untested.
A better format for arguing the subject would be to discuss specific proposed methods individually. To just say time travel isn't possible is to not only dismiss current theorized methods, which there may well be reason to dismiss, but also time travelling methods that have yet to even have been theorized.
Some scientist who is trying to come up w/a method of time travel, even in his failure, might accidentally discover something else useful completely unrelated to that goal. Many failed experiments have led to great discoveries unrelated to the stated goals of said experiments after all.
Until it is known one way or the other, via experimentation that is, it can still be profitable to have less certainty on the subject. If we think we already know the answer, then we'll stop searching for the answer and that would be sad, even if it turned out after all the searching that time travel wasn't possible - the failed search for the possibility could still be fruitful.
Or to put it another way, lets not poo poo the people eager to prove time travel a possibility, even if we foresee failure in their future, for even if they are wrong, their failed attempts at proving so could lead to beneficial results for us all, or who knows, maybe they could even succeed.
He just said there is an opposite direction, which makes a symmetrical cone, of time. Then he states, he as no clue what going backwards in time would mean. In effect, he is saying there are two Universes going forward in time from one point. Is this implying the other Universe would be back in time? I wouldn't think so from what he said. I still fail to see how that denies a timeless beginning.
If space & time comes in at a point, what is beyond that point? If the point is infinite, but timeless, why did it happen at that specific moment in time. Why not twice as long ago, or last week? He deflected the question with his timeless time question. He knew what the statement was intended to question.
Still, if I put them on a graph, with the future to the left, he is saying both Universes would be headed left. Therefore, their common origin is incidental, not a description of a time before the Big Bang for us. So their might be two Universes, but the other Universe might also be like time travel.
what do u get when u mix two motza balls togeather in a bowl? motza ball soup
This is how I see it. The universe is not ruled by time. Rather, time is ruiled by the universe. Why? Simply because we created time. Therefore, it is no surprise that the universe has many different spots that will be able to dilate the time on your clock.
If time travel can't happen in this universe, was that out of the universe's creation program for to happen?
Yes, everyone is time traveling in the chronological direction.
APPARANTLY IF A DOZEN OR MORE PEOPLE FART DIRECTLY IN YOUR FACE ALL BACK TO BACK, ITS POSSIBLE THAT PERSON CAN GO BACK IN TIME, BUT ONLY TO GET REVENGE ON THE POOPIE HEADS THAT FARTED IN YOUR FACE. ITS THE LAW OF QUANTUM FACE FARTING.
"Time is emergent"?? Surely time is emergence itself???
Time travel is something you do with your mind. Everything exists in the eternal "now".
kvnmcinturff1 nice... but excuse me, how has the universe expanded and cooled and given rise to sentient life that needed millennia to evolve to the point where you could type a statement like that on the internet?!
@@GriuGriu64 nonsense. familiar attempt to shoehorn quantum physics into vedantic idealism... still nonsense. so you're saying modern science is still far away from grasping what ancient yogis knew? nonsense.
@@GriuGriu64 i am familiar with the argument. he rebuttal is simple: 1) as far as we know, quantum physics has absolutely zero implications for our experience of everyday reality at the macro level. 2) quantum physics is not a justification for any forms of religious or magical thinking. it has likewise zero implications on kitsch spiritual assertions about reality, consciousness and the divine.
in short, the two have simply nothing to do with one another -but i understand the appeal of the argument because it has been promoted and sold to the new age demographic incredibly successfully since the 80's but peaking at total saturation about 10 years ago...
@@GriuGriu64 sure thing ;)
@@GriuGriu64 awww you're a generous conversationalist!
Anyone know where David Anderson went? Anderson institute. Worked on time control and time warp feilds.
Soon I figure out how to do it.
We**
I think in order in for time travel to be possible, reality would conditions we which we don't know of yet, from our current understandings and assumptions, no it's not possible
In other words is Back to the Future possible?
Technically you travel to the past when you travel at extremely fast velocities, it's just not your past, it's someone else's, I dont think the concept of traveling back to a point in time is that far fetched, just as space seems to be transverseable, time should also be since the two are intertwined
At last - a physicist who believes in the physical world rather than a mathematical one.
What is it when you go back in time in your memory?
a flashback?
How can you go back or forward of your life by time travel because at
every moments of past and future of your life there is a version of you
already. So if you go back 10 years, you will only see what your 10
years younger version was doing. you can only watch but can not be
active because you are already there. Two same person can not exist at
the same time. So time travel is not possible.
😂😂😂😂 lol.. seems like you speak like Parrot, but have no wisdom...
Two same person present can exist at same time, only if somebody is not observing us. (Both person) at a same time!!
You need to learn quantum physics..😂😂😂😂😂
He is nothing but illuminati's d**********!!
Time travel to the future is quite real and even to the past but u could never go back before the tech or phenomenon is invented on a practical lvl is a diff story
This guy is the old clear eyes commercial guy
OK, so you hold events that invites time travelers to go back in time and attend, and no one shows up. So, what? Why would they? Why give away time travel to those not worthy to understand it? Huh?
..I believe it could be possible to look into the future but not move your person to the future...I think that time is infused with geometry on a macro level but on a quantum level time is separated from the geometry...and I believe we are also infused with the geometry on a macro level, but on a fundamental level, say in the neurons of our brain,.... not...
How come all these time travelers from another era can never talk about what will happen in present or near future?
You could go check out your place of birth after you become old but it does not mean you will become a child when you reach there.
*Anything* within the laws of physics is possible in this universe...but in 13.8 billion years since the big bang began there has been *_no_* sign of an advanced civilization but us. *We are alone, folks....* 💕 ☮ 🌎 🌌
... and trapped.
@@chrisc1257 ...in cave of light.
In platos closet.
@@fatass4985 310
We only search a small amount of the universe, there likely are intelligence specie like us on difference planet, we has to keep on looking through all those radio wave
Time is erased as time passes ..memories of time exist but not the time itself ..you cant actually recreate the time that existed...so as future time has not been created by movement of the sun and moon ..only one could actually be able to control time would be the creater of time itself ..the clock maker you could say ..we would only have to step out of our existance in time to realize what time is ..we are a blink in existance in infinity ..now say we could jump into alternate universes and if they exist then we could assume we move into it and live out what we want to happen ...my theory
Time is a human construct. There is only the local Here and Now, memory and prediction.
You are so right. In other words: Tme is just an illusion, it doesnt exist, never existed and never will, Time is just physical stuff changing positions. Days are not passing becasue of time and Sun is not rising up every day because of time ...
R A Feller how to explain the Lake Michigan Triangle?
Isn’t time the entropy of the universe and the local here and now is part of observing a relative localized part of this entropy? Relatively renders a universal moment of now as a meaningless endeavor to speculate.
@@alephnull7410 yes, but wherever you go in the universe, there you are.
R A Feller understood, but subtracting the observer out, eliminating the “you” that you mentioned, it is important to notice that the way “time”, or the entropy of the universe unfolds is different in different locations such as near a black hole or the “experience” of a photon, which is without time. We may be arguing different points but I’m just drawing attention to the fact that what we consider time is just entropy and relativity is important to consider when speaking about the “now” of any one experience.
unless i got a brain tumor or something...when we understand dreams and consciousness the answer to this will get more grey. maybe even change in some ways.
even if consciousness is physical maybe dreams are not. maybe by manipulating one you can sorta steer the other.
GreensOplenty methinks brain tumor.
It's TRUE! The proof is the Ingersoll Lockwood books about Baron Trump adventures. Look it up!
So, it's not traversable in the normal sense of travel. There's no way to move in a direction of negative time. But we can go to a lesser positive time. There was never a time when time did not exist and, there is no place that space does not exist.
if it were true, where are the travelers?