Go for quality over quantity in your stories, repeating a sentence/idea with minor variations just ads quantity of words and ruined what could have been a good story.
It's better than most on all metrics, grammar, vocabulary, etc. However, though the story drives forward with power and precision, there is a large plot hole that is covered up by action and indomitable verbiage.
@@ianmccardle330 I've been reading SF since my childhood. Sometimes the outrageous use of vocabulary seems reminiscent of classics [that are mostly unreadable today] or comic books [that I stopped reading before high school]. Then there are the plots and plot holes that resemble the worst of the A.A. "Doc" Smith genre, an SF version of "Perils of Pauline." Many of these SF videos are, or seem to be, inept rewrites of previous stories. Sometimes, if well done, they can be appreciated, but usually they are too bad to even continue with after the first few minutes. Your point about inexact vocabulary is telling. English relies on context more than dictionary definition, and many times the same word has opposite meanings in American and British dialects. A single word may have a dozen meanings. also spelling is a problem even for native speakers. In order to handle just these issues, an AI would have to be far more advanced than anything available now and for the foreseeable future.
Gotta say there was a lot of words salad in there. Dozens of small to major plot holes. Really should have had somebody that had some knowledge of naval combat, proof read it before publishing it.
@@pagansavage5267 That's true, but using a naval template is the source of some plot holes. Ships have to stay in the water, planes have more maneuverability but must stay in the air. In a space battle you can't "encircle" as in a sea battle, you have to "englobe." "Dogfights" are possible in space, but large ships built like naval ships have a huge blindspot.
Surely stealth vessels should be able to move without notice in brightest area of space? Darkest areas of space i would have thought easy. Pedantic i guess but thought struck me when listening
It should be the other way around. In a dark room a light is easier to detect then in broad daylight. "Stealth" just means that no signals like waves of different lenghts (light, radio, heat) are emitted. If there is much around you it is easier to hide. So it is correct, it is much harder to hide in the darkest areas compared to the brightest areas based on our physics.
Look, im sure it's cheaper and easier to use an A.I. to write and read your stories, be to be home, you'll never get the views or interaction of a human operated channel. At the very least, get a human reader, and get a proofreader to go through the A.I. stories and clean them up.
I would never want to have those human admirals in command of my fleets. It's pure bad tactics to go after fuel tenders and supply ships when you have the most important targets that can destroy your fleet not getting attacked.
Right? What fool goes after unarmed supply vessels when you have active threats that can be eliminated. A fuel tender or supply ship is worthless without a warship to resupply, but a warship can still fight in a limited capacity without resupply, and thus is still a threat.
It's useful in an extended conflict. But not this for sure I'm comparing to modern sea warship. 6-8 months without resupply, can go a year but that'd be with alot of rationing. Unsure of more complicated things like ammo/fuel.
arrrrrrrr when are these channels going to stop generating and using AI stories. They are logicaly and gramaticaly bad. Soulless is the best way I can describe it. Just more trash. Sigh
Go for quality over quantity in your stories, repeating a sentence/idea with minor variations just ads quantity of words and ruined what could have been a good story.
Better AI as well heard one today that had "ma'am", as "ma am" in a military esk story no less. XD
It's all AI and poorly written and structured
@15:23 The humans fleet used North Vietnam guerrilla "hit and run" tactics...in space.
The council fleet muct have been totally distroyed five times or more in the story ?
There's no such thing as "overkill".
I'm gonna check out the blind swordsman. He strikes with "Precision" 😮😅😊😂
@@jeffhall4228 precisely ha ha
It's almost like us humans are superhuman. 😁👌
The counsel had way too many realizations they were loosing. Over and over and over. Once they realized once that was enough. Otherwise ok.
Can I get a link/copy of the background image? It looks really cool, but it seems to be a custom AI image not posted on the interwebs
It's better than most on all metrics, grammar, vocabulary, etc. However, though the story drives forward with power and precision, there is a large plot hole that is covered up by action and indomitable verbiage.
One would have thought AI would at least be accurate with words meanings. Accuracy and clarity I would honestly have expected , sadly not to be
@@ianmccardle330 I've been reading SF since my childhood. Sometimes the outrageous use of vocabulary seems reminiscent of classics [that are mostly unreadable today] or comic books [that I stopped reading before high school].
Then there are the plots and plot holes that resemble the worst of the A.A. "Doc" Smith genre, an SF version of "Perils of Pauline." Many of these SF videos are, or seem to be, inept rewrites of previous stories. Sometimes, if well done, they can be appreciated, but usually they are too bad to even continue with after the first few minutes.
Your point about inexact vocabulary is telling. English relies on context more than dictionary definition, and many times the same word has opposite meanings in American and British dialects. A single word may have a dozen meanings. also spelling is a problem even for native speakers. In order to handle just these issues, an AI would have to be far more advanced than anything available now and for the foreseeable future.
Gotta say there was a lot of words salad in there. Dozens of small to major plot holes. Really should have had somebody that had some knowledge of naval combat, proof read it before publishing it.
@@pagansavage5267 That's true, but using a naval template is the source of some plot holes. Ships have to stay in the water, planes have more maneuverability but must stay in the air. In a space battle you can't "encircle" as in a sea battle, you have to "englobe." "Dogfights" are possible in space, but large ships built like naval ships have a huge blindspot.
The only good part about this endlessly repeated story is the AI artwork
Broadcast needs to be: “RUN”
HERE GO HUMANS ! HERE WE GO! DONT SCREW WITH EARTH. Haha.
Surely stealth vessels should be able to move without notice in brightest area of space? Darkest areas of space i would have thought easy. Pedantic i guess but thought struck me when listening
It should be the other way around. In a dark room a light is easier to detect then in broad daylight. "Stealth" just means that no signals like waves of different lenghts (light, radio, heat) are emitted. If there is much around you it is easier to hide.
So it is correct, it is much harder to hide in the darkest areas compared to the brightest areas based on our physics.
Great video 🙂
Even the comments were made by an AI you can always tell when the AI uses palpable at least twice😂😂😂😂
Not bad for a 5th grader.
Or an AI
Too wordy!
Look, im sure it's cheaper and easier to use an A.I. to write and read your stories, be to be home, you'll never get the views or interaction of a human operated channel. At the very least, get a human reader, and get a proofreader to go through the A.I. stories and clean them up.
I would never want to have those human admirals in command of my fleets. It's pure bad tactics to go after fuel tenders and supply ships when you have the most important targets that can destroy your fleet not getting attacked.
Right? What fool goes after unarmed supply vessels when you have active threats that can be eliminated. A fuel tender or supply ship is worthless without a warship to resupply, but a warship can still fight in a limited capacity without resupply, and thus is still a threat.
It's useful in an extended conflict. But not this for sure
I'm comparing to modern sea warship. 6-8 months without resupply, can go a year but that'd be with alot of rationing. Unsure of more complicated things like ammo/fuel.
How many fleets did the empire bring?
The author (A.I.?) needs to learn the economy of words.
Voice actor gets paid by the word.
You really can't even use spell-check ?!?
How does a ship list in space
Solid point🤣🤣🤣🤣👍👍
Excessive verbage.
arrrrrrrr when are these channels going to stop generating and using AI stories. They are logicaly and gramaticaly bad. Soulless is the best way I can describe it. Just more trash. Sigh
Really bad writing
Your A.I. is bland.
Just lazy. No signs of upgrade or complexity.