Dont lie . BANTU were never ever indeginious to South Africa lets get that straight! dont write your own history . BANTU expansion was colonization. I hate when other races wants to tell our story
South Africa isnt our land vele. We hate this land. This is the land of our enemies. We despise this land and we pray daily that The Most High judges this land with Thermal Nuclear Destruction. This is Sodom and Gomorrah 2.0. Why the hell would one wanna claim a land defiled by Blood and mass Sodomy. This land is filthy!
The central African Bantu dessimated whole clans of KHOI and SAN , before the whites atrocities . This often told romanticized Bantu narrative is false . The Bantu were the first colonisers in the land of the KHOI and SAN .
This is not our land. This is the land of our enemy. The land of our Captivity. The Most High sent us to South Africa in order to punish us. This is not our Homeland. Israel is our Homeland. Not this evil, wicked land called South Africa.
So true girl and white stil 1410 was great as you set 1652 shame ne and den the 30 year's black for got the koi san Africacoloured shame ne God is watching as 2024 / 1955 NP and ANC so set all af as💎💎💎💎💎💎
The Bantu did similar things to the indigenous first nation of SA . Khoi and San men were killed and women rped . The woman and children were taken into the bantu tribes and kept as servants/ slaves . These forced assimilations resulted in language adaptations and also lighter skin tones among the Bantu . The bushmen SAN had to eventually escape to undesirable desert regions , while the KHOI herders migrated away south westerly to avoid further loses .
From my reading of publications there is no historical or anthropological evidence of Bantu people enslaving "Khoisan" people. Which studies are you quoting? There was significant interaction and conflict between these groups.
@Gerrardboss-v2g this is a falacy. I am someone of Khoi descent classified as Coloured and I have made a point of studying relations between Khoikhoi and amaXhosa and there is clear evidence that though there were sometimes skirmishes, there is no evidence of pre-colonial or colonial era enslavement of Khoikhoi & San by Xhosa people. During the colonial era there was in fact more cooperation between Khoikhoi and Xhosa than there was fighting between them. A huge example is the Cape Frontier Wars between Khoikhoi and Xhosa joining forces againsts the Brits and the Boers. There are various clans among the amaXhosa and they do not all descend from one tribe/clan. Among those are also a few clans that originate from Khoikhoi / Kwe. It is of course a lot more complicated than I am explaining here, but your insinuation of the Xhosa enslaving Khoi & San is ahistorical and malicious.
@@ryanswano the earliest skirmishes between the stone age Khoi clans did result in deaths , with the women and children being taken captive . As I indicated their position in the Bantu tribe would have equalled servant hood status and that can be a form of slavery but not in the conventional understanding of the term . This present pro black historical narrative overly romanticizes and distorts reality to support a particular agenda . I would encourage you to get a further historical perspective from the earliest maps of the time . Google maps by Isaak Tirion and Pieter van der Aa .
My comment is servant / slave not slave in the conventional understanding. Earliest encounters between the nomadic Khoi and San and the iron age Bantu resulted in deaths . The foreign culture , ethnicity, language, religion and permanent villages lifestyles of the central Africans could never be easily accepted or accommodated . The Bantu have ALWAYS held the smaller browned skinned strange speaking people in contempt . History shows and even today the bantu still seperate themselves in matters of power , land and resources , nothing has changed . Old maps of 1713 and 1740 indicated SA as the land of the Hottentots . Gonaqua KHOI were present in Natal . Portuguese sailors recorded a tribe of Gorinqua Khoi in Tete Mozambique . Those were still times of few Bantu in southern Africa . The nomadic Khoi and San roamed unhindered back then . This overly romanticized pro black Bantu version of history is incorrect and distorted .
You are stupid. How can slaves influence language so much?!? Slaves are stripped from their language and identity they dont get the privilege to impose their language on their masters. So dont be stupid. Bantu people are the Chosen people of God and we dont carry the spirit of wickedness and Colonisation. We embrace everyone and we are hated by everyone. Infact the role of the COLOURED people conducting slave raids on the Bantu tribes (selling us to the Boere your real Fathers who made you Bastards), will have to be addressed one day. You will pay for your sins together with the Europeans. Your day of judgement is nigh.
All of africas seacoast countries and cities have high mixed populations. So whenever invaders came into africa rape was always a weapon of conquest. ie East africa high mixture of Indian/Arab mixture in Ethiopia called Habesha.
You are right about the first two points, but there is a significant error regarding the Habesha people. The Habesha, representing ethnic groups like the Tigray, Tigrinya, and Amhara within the ancient Northern Abyssinian Christian Orthodox Empire, who read scriptures in Ge'ez, but they are not a mix of Indians and Bedouin Arabs. Unlike the Swahili Coast Bantu tribes, who are primarily agricultural Bantu people that migrated to the coast and intermingled with Arab, Persian merchants, seamen, and slave traders, the Habesha are ancient Cushitic people with historical Sabean admixture (the Sabeans being an extinct group). Additionally, it is important to mention that Bantu agriculturalists are not indigenous to the Horn of Africa, East Africa, or the Great Lakes region. These areas were originally inhabited by hunter-gatherers in tropical forests and by Nilotic and Cushitic pastoralists in what is now South Sudan, Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, Burundi, Rwanda, the Northern Frontier District (NFD), Somalia, and Ethiopia long before the Bantu migration. Every Tutsi, Kalenjin, Maasai, Somali, Bahima, Turkana and so on are aware of this.
@@nassergabriel4778 Well what are they a mixture of ? Many of you love to deny mixture but the early dna tests showed many Horn of African people with mixtures of Middle East, mainly Yemen ancestry. Even one of the Somali clans is said to come from an Arab or Yemeni guy.
@@fredbantu3694 rape also occurred when the central African Bantu invaded South Africa . The small brown people of strange language were forever displaced by the war like Bantu . Skirmishes occurred and Khoi -San men were killed, the woman rped and together with the children taken captive. This resulted in language adaptations and lighter skin tones among the newcomers.
@@Gerrardboss-v2g Where did you get that information ? Any reference that dont have European ancetory please. Amazing a settler wanting to teach me African history.
Enjoyed the video😊❤️Thank you for handling this conversation with care.
Great job...quite informative
Thank you for your video. Coming from Bermuda this is very helpful background for my upcoming trip to South Africa.
I am so happy an African is speaking about slavery or mentioned slavery on the African continent. Many Africans deny they are slave descendants
Because many of them are not slave descendants.
Thanks for the excellent explanation. Very edictional.
Khoi and San people was not started through colonization we were here years before they came here first indigenous people of South Africa
Dont lie . BANTU were never ever indeginious to South Africa lets get that straight! dont write your own history . BANTU expansion was colonization. I hate when other races wants to tell our story
South Africa isnt our land vele. We hate this land. This is the land of our enemies. We despise this land and we pray daily that The Most High judges this land with Thermal Nuclear Destruction. This is Sodom and Gomorrah 2.0. Why the hell would one wanna claim a land defiled by Blood and mass Sodomy. This land is filthy!
There's no such thing as a bantu, the bantu expansion is a theory not a fact
The central African Bantu dessimated whole clans of KHOI and SAN , before the whites atrocities .
This often told romanticized Bantu narrative is false .
The Bantu were the first colonisers in the land of the KHOI and SAN .
Bantu are indigenous in South Africa. They are admixture of Khoi son.
This is not our land. This is the land of our enemy. The land of our Captivity. The Most High sent us to South Africa in order to punish us. This is not our Homeland. Israel is our Homeland. Not this evil, wicked land called South Africa.
False
Trevor is not coloured and don't him want to identify as one.
dom poes🤣🤣🤣
So true girl and white stil 1410 was great as you set 1652 shame ne and den the 30 year's black for got the koi san Africacoloured shame ne God is watching as 2024 / 1955 NP and ANC so set all af as💎💎💎💎💎💎
You lying. Brazilians have the most diverse mixed DNA not your so called "Coloureds".
False.
The Bantu did similar things to the indigenous first nation of SA .
Khoi and San men were killed and women rped . The woman and children were taken into the bantu tribes and kept as servants/ slaves .
These forced assimilations resulted in language adaptations and also lighter skin tones among the Bantu .
The bushmen SAN had to eventually escape to undesirable desert regions , while the KHOI herders migrated away south westerly to avoid further loses .
From my reading of publications there is no historical or anthropological evidence of Bantu people enslaving "Khoisan" people. Which studies are you quoting? There was significant interaction and conflict between these groups.
@Gerrardboss-v2g this is a falacy. I am someone of Khoi descent classified as Coloured and I have made a point of studying relations between Khoikhoi and amaXhosa and there is clear evidence that though there were sometimes skirmishes, there is no evidence of pre-colonial or colonial era enslavement of Khoikhoi & San by Xhosa people.
During the colonial era there was in fact more cooperation between Khoikhoi and Xhosa than there was fighting between them. A huge example is the Cape Frontier Wars between Khoikhoi and Xhosa joining forces againsts the Brits and the Boers.
There are various clans among the amaXhosa and they do not all descend from one tribe/clan. Among those are also a few clans that originate from Khoikhoi / Kwe.
It is of course a lot more complicated than I am explaining here, but your insinuation of the Xhosa enslaving Khoi & San is ahistorical and malicious.
@@ryanswano the earliest skirmishes between the stone age Khoi clans did result in deaths , with the women and children being taken captive . As I indicated their position in the Bantu tribe would have equalled servant hood status and that can be a form of slavery but not in the conventional understanding of the term .
This present pro black historical narrative overly romanticizes and distorts reality to support a particular agenda .
I would encourage you to get a further historical perspective from the earliest maps of the time .
Google maps by Isaak Tirion and Pieter van der Aa .
My comment is servant / slave not slave in the conventional understanding.
Earliest encounters between the nomadic Khoi and San and the iron age Bantu resulted in deaths .
The foreign culture , ethnicity, language, religion and permanent villages lifestyles of the central Africans could never be easily accepted or accommodated .
The Bantu have ALWAYS held the smaller browned skinned strange speaking people in contempt .
History shows and even today the bantu still seperate themselves in matters of power , land and resources , nothing has changed .
Old maps of 1713 and 1740 indicated SA as the land of the Hottentots .
Gonaqua KHOI were present in Natal .
Portuguese sailors recorded a tribe of Gorinqua Khoi in Tete Mozambique .
Those were still times of few Bantu in southern Africa .
The nomadic Khoi and San roamed unhindered back then . This overly romanticized pro black Bantu version of history is incorrect and distorted .
You are stupid. How can slaves influence language so much?!? Slaves are stripped from their language and identity they dont get the privilege to impose their language on their masters. So dont be stupid. Bantu people are the Chosen people of God and we dont carry the spirit of wickedness and Colonisation. We embrace everyone and we are hated by everyone. Infact the role of the COLOURED people conducting slave raids on the Bantu tribes (selling us to the Boere your real Fathers who made you Bastards), will have to be addressed one day. You will pay for your sins together with the Europeans. Your day of judgement is nigh.
All of africas seacoast countries and cities have high mixed populations. So whenever invaders came into africa rape was always a weapon of conquest. ie East africa high mixture of Indian/Arab mixture in Ethiopia called Habesha.
You are right about the first two points, but there is a significant error regarding the Habesha people. The Habesha, representing ethnic groups like the Tigray, Tigrinya, and Amhara within the ancient Northern Abyssinian Christian Orthodox Empire, who read scriptures in Ge'ez, but they are not a mix of Indians and Bedouin Arabs.
Unlike the Swahili Coast Bantu tribes, who are primarily agricultural Bantu people that migrated to the coast and intermingled with Arab, Persian merchants, seamen, and slave traders, the Habesha are ancient Cushitic people with historical Sabean admixture (the Sabeans being an extinct group).
Additionally, it is important to mention that Bantu agriculturalists are not indigenous to the Horn of Africa, East Africa, or the Great Lakes region. These areas were originally inhabited by hunter-gatherers in tropical forests and by Nilotic and Cushitic pastoralists in what is now South Sudan, Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, Burundi, Rwanda, the Northern Frontier District (NFD), Somalia, and Ethiopia long before the Bantu migration. Every Tutsi, Kalenjin, Maasai, Somali, Bahima, Turkana and so on are aware of this.
@@nassergabriel4778 Well what are they a mixture of ? Many of you love to deny mixture but the early dna tests showed many Horn of African people with mixtures of Middle East, mainly Yemen ancestry. Even one of the Somali clans is said to come from an Arab or Yemeni guy.
@@fredbantu3694 rape also occurred when the central African Bantu invaded South Africa . The small brown people of strange language were forever displaced by the war like Bantu .
Skirmishes occurred and Khoi -San men were killed, the woman rped and together with the children taken captive.
This resulted in language adaptations and lighter skin tones among the newcomers.
@@Gerrardboss-v2g Where did you get that information ? Any reference that dont have European ancetory please. Amazing a settler wanting to teach me African history.
@@fredbantu3694 you getting the facts from the first nation now