Opinionpalooza: This SCOTUS Decision Is Actually Even More Devastating Than We First Thought |...
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 лип 2024
- Administrative law may not sound sexy. And maybe that’s because it truly isn’t sexy. But it is at the very center of the biggest decisions this past Supreme Court term, and also widely misunderstood. In this week’s show, we asked Georgetown Law School’s Professor Lisa Heinzerling to come back to help hack through the thorny thicket of administrative law so we can more fully understand the ramifications of a clutch of cases handed down this term that - taken together - rearrange the whole project of modern government. The Supreme Court’s biggest power grab for a generation isn’t just about bestowing new and huge powers upon itself, it’s also about shifting power from agencies established in the public interest to corporations, industry and billionaires.
This is part of Opinionpalooza, Slate’s coverage of the major decisions from the Supreme Court this June. We kicked things off this year by explaining How Originalism Ate the Law. The best way to support our work is by joining Slate Plus. (If you are already a member, consider a donation or merch!)
Want more Amicus? Subscribe to Slate Plus to immediately unlock exclusive SCOTUS analysis and weekly extended episodes. Plus, you’ll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Or, visit slate.com/amicusplus to get access wherever you listen.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Note: Captions are auto-generated by UA-cam.
Follow Amicus on UA-cam: • The Trump Indictment |...
Subscribe to Slate: / slate
Learn more: slate.com/podcasts/amicus
Follow Slate on Social:
Host Dahlia Lithwick on Twitter: / dahlialithwick
Slate on Twitter - / slate
Slate Podcasts on Twitter - / slatepodcasts
Slate on Facebook: / slate
Slate on Instagram: / slate
The court is prepping for Heritage Foundation's agenda.
Setting the table...
If you are going to pump us with ads, you could at least get some decent microphones, SLATE!
I practice law and work with federal agencies all the time. I am not a conservative and don’t like the current court. The Chevron Doctrine was always wrong and it’s demise is a correction, not a tragedy. It gave far, far, far too much power to unelected bureaucrats. Bureaucrats who can be and often are lazy, crazy, foolish, arrogant or deeply flawed in any number of ways, yet mostly unaccountable because of Chevron. Further, agencies are often staffed by one side or the other’s activists, ideologues or other sundry zealots. Not neutral experts. Further still, under Chevron, Congress could and did pass vague laws that basically said, “agency, you figure out what the law should be” thus passing no law at all but merely delegating the legislative power to the Executive Branch, which is very destructive of our constitutional system of government. No, good riddance to Chevron. As they say, even a broken clock is right twice a day.
SMFH
Hope you do not get e-coli or salmonella, you are about as much a genius as Nazi 'Spray the lungs with Lysol" TrumpVirus.
At least those people were acting on behalf of the ELECTED president. Now the court has relegated the powers to A COMPLETELY UNELECTED BODY -- themselves.
Now kinged judges who have ZERO EXPERIENCE will make decisions. Luckily they legalized BRIBERY so that SOMEONE will tell them how to rule our lives and kill us with pollution
So, get rid of a bad system and replace it with worse?