I honestly didn’t know you could go below 4. I have 700 hours and after my first two games ever I was in 4. I just assumed 1-3 was for brand new or something
@@DisTYM Seems the hipfire spread is much better post-1896. Like the fight you had a Kingfisher it seemed to be pretty good, but you were moving a lot more in the fight at Machine Gorge. Even then it seemed to be more tight grouping.
Ever since they made the changes to MMR, I'm usually stuck in 6 star hell. I think I've been 5 star once since the change, but immediately got thrown back into the pit. My games are rarely like this video anymore. I always get toxic TTV sweatlords, long ammo Andys, or sometimes the semi-rare "pro gamer" (blatant cheater). At this point I'm starting to wonder if HUNT would benefit from a casual and ranked system. Who knows. Good shootin'.
im in the same boat, i was 4-5 before the update now im 5-6. I cant say i've ever seen a blatent cheater, all i find are campers or Patient Andys. idk if a casual mode is the way, but a 5v5 or some kinda short quick team game would be ideal. It would help all the unconfident players learn the guns and movement faster.
I was 2.5 star before the update, after 3 games (1 kill, 3 kills, 3 kills) and dying each one, I got stuck in 6 for 5 matches until I just decided to solo queue and purposely die, hoping to get killed by the less skilled of the duo to derank. It took me about 16 games of just shooting around enemies and getting myself killed to hit 3 stars
@@DisTYM This. Also used to average 4-5 star. I got to 6 star about 3 times pre-change, and it only lasted one round. 😆 I've only encountered a couple cheaters since the big update. I've always said at the very least that quads would be cool: More of your friends could group up, you'd have 3 teams of 4 on a map, which would provide bigger battles that would last longer and have more of that wild west shootout feel. There's lots of amazing ideas and opportunities to be had. Hopefully Crytec learns from their past and takes more risks/creative freedom going forward.
They just need to increase the limit to 10 stars. This way you don't have 5k elo with 3k eloin the same lobby. If you are a 5* for example, you could be placed in a lobby with only 4,5 and 6*. Ez fix
Maybe, the elo isn't the problem it's the matchmaking. Counterstrike makes you wait up to 5 minutes sometimes for a match and it's over a million people on that game. They either need to make you wait 5-10 minutes in que to get an even game or remove the stars and go off of straight elo But tbh I don't think it's terrible ATM. It's pretty good for the amount of people it's dealing with.
That’s just adding extra steps , and it addressing any real issues . Because people will then complain about having to fight more than 2 different MMR in a lobby
@@DisTYMI think a good way to fix it would be to determine rank by win rate, accuracy, and kills with equipment (dynamite, red barrels etc.) the current system of ‘oh you’re 3 star a killed a single 5 star? you must at least be 4.5 star!’ is awful. anyone can get a lucky kill and then get stuck in elo hell
Nope it’s not. They completely redid how ranks work. How long you’ve been playing hunt for and your average ranking are factors now that prevent you from going down in rank easily
30s in and i see a bow.... I am in pain... I hate bows.. if a 7.62mm (or 7.44? I forgot the older round used by the mosen) to the heart does not kill (not that i want it to god no) a sharp stick should not oneshot to the chest.
If videogames were 100% realistic we wouldnt be playing them. The whole point is to not be realistic as we all are using them to escape from reality. But i get what you're saying.
They could've atleast give one shot to high caliber upclose, but most high caliber guns oneshot if you have less than 1 hp bar, so it keeps it "balanced".
The thumbnail should be a weapon inspect
If only it was 😂
The sky should be blue….
My 6 star experience can be most accurately represented by the clip of Joseph seed yelling "RELEASE ME!" at the top of his lungs
😂😂
ngl, 4 star and up is the most miserable way to experience hunt.
I honestly didn’t know you could go below 4. I have 700 hours and after my first two games ever I was in 4. I just assumed 1-3 was for brand new or something
@@roe__jogan What does this mean?
@@roe__jogan it depends if you've have a lot of fps experience before, I have almost 5,000 hours combined in other fps games and I started at 3 star
@@chriskotzenberg1261I think 4 star is a good spot to be, I had the most fun in 4star. The game is always rough, but I love how unforgivable it is.
Forgot they increased the special ammo for the Bow. Poison arrows look like fun!
Poison arrows are amazing now, no need for an ammo box with them anymore
@@DisTYM Seems the hipfire spread is much better post-1896. Like the fight you had a Kingfisher it seemed to be pretty good, but you were moving a lot more in the fight at Machine Gorge. Even then it seemed to be more tight grouping.
@@SkullyXboxthe hip fire is ideal in most spots, unless you're moving. Hopping around in hip fire is basically the only way to move
Love that Cyclone.
Why does this dude not have 1 mill subs? Ggs timbojimbombo
Because people are jealous of how hot and sexy I am 🥵
Ever since they made the changes to MMR, I'm usually stuck in 6 star hell. I think I've been 5 star once since the change, but immediately got thrown back into the pit. My games are rarely like this video anymore. I always get toxic TTV sweatlords, long ammo Andys, or sometimes the semi-rare "pro gamer" (blatant cheater). At this point I'm starting to wonder if HUNT would benefit from a casual and ranked system. Who knows. Good shootin'.
Facts, my third game ever i was placed against all 6's with p2w skins
im in the same boat, i was 4-5 before the update now im 5-6. I cant say i've ever seen a blatent cheater, all i find are campers or Patient Andys.
idk if a casual mode is the way, but a 5v5 or some kinda short quick team game would be ideal. It would help all the unconfident players learn the guns and movement faster.
I was 2.5 star before the update, after 3 games (1 kill, 3 kills, 3 kills) and dying each one, I got stuck in 6 for 5 matches until I just decided to solo queue and purposely die, hoping to get killed by the less skilled of the duo to derank. It took me about 16 games of just shooting around enemies and getting myself killed to hit 3 stars
@@DisTYM This. Also used to average 4-5 star. I got to 6 star about 3 times pre-change, and it only lasted one round. 😆 I've only encountered a couple cheaters since the big update.
I've always said at the very least that quads would be cool: More of your friends could group up, you'd have 3 teams of 4 on a map, which would provide bigger battles that would last longer and have more of that wild west shootout feel. There's lots of amazing ideas and opportunities to be had. Hopefully Crytec learns from their past and takes more risks/creative freedom going forward.
They just need to increase the limit to 10 stars.
This way you don't have 5k elo with 3k eloin the same lobby.
If you are a 5* for example, you could be placed in a lobby with only 4,5 and 6*.
Ez fix
Maybe, the elo isn't the problem it's the matchmaking.
Counterstrike makes you wait up to 5 minutes sometimes for a match and it's over a million people on that game.
They either need to make you wait 5-10 minutes in que to get an even game or remove the stars and go off of straight elo
But tbh I don't think it's terrible ATM.
It's pretty good for the amount of people it's dealing with.
That’s just adding extra steps , and it addressing any real issues . Because people will then complain about having to fight more than 2 different MMR in a lobby
@@drugsarebad97people complain about everything. Can't please people that don't wanna be pleased.
@@DisTYMI think a good way to fix it would be to determine rank by win rate, accuracy, and kills with equipment (dynamite, red barrels etc.) the current system of ‘oh you’re 3 star a killed a single 5 star? you must at least be 4.5 star!’ is awful. anyone can get a lucky kill and then get stuck in elo hell
I don’t play nearly as well as you and I’ve been stuck in 6 stars since 1886 launched. MMR is broken
These are highlight games, I die in horrible ways most of my games. We prolly are about the same.
Nope it’s not. They completely redid how ranks work. How long you’ve been playing hunt for and your average ranking are factors now that prevent you from going down in rank easily
Dat barb wire arrow be killing
Yoo I cant even get past a 3 star fr fk 6star lobbys I'll just enjoy my 2 star middle 3 star lobbys
Enjoy it while it lasts, I'm stuck near the "no fun zone" aka 6star
30s in and i see a bow.... I am in pain... I hate bows.. if a 7.62mm (or 7.44? I forgot the older round used by the mosen) to the heart does not kill (not that i want it to god no) a sharp stick should not oneshot to the chest.
If videogames were 100% realistic we wouldnt be playing them. The whole point is to not be realistic as we all are using them to escape from reality.
But i get what you're saying.
They could've atleast give one shot to high caliber upclose, but most high caliber guns oneshot if you have less than 1 hp bar, so it keeps it "balanced".
@@Happy_Sailor639 I think it's pretty balanced, just gotta hit headshots.
yeah this is obviously not 6 star. these dudes are all so terrible.
6star elo is from 2950-5000, I'm clearly not the top of 6star but im in there.
@@DisTYM The range of 6 star is insane. They really need to add 2-3 ranks in the 6 star elo range