Using a VPN only protects your IP address. It does not stop Google or UA-cam from your search results or locations. You have to choose to Sable all of those settings, which 90% of people won't due to ease of the apps in the first place.
I have a pick-up with a utility body ( built in tool boxes, like you might expect to see an electrician or plumber driving ). So, I am wondering if the Cops could go into each of the locked compartments. The issue being that many of my tools could be misconstrued as weapons, especially my two machetes. Many other cutting implements, you could stab someone with a screwdriver. Hammers could be bludgeons. And so forth.
@misteranonomous7717 Qualified Immunity for law enforcement, is only applicable if civillians can claim immunity for doing the same thing, for the same/similar reasons under the Constitution and 14th ammendment.
"policy,"... " police ... y". Somebody brought that to my attention recently, lol. The enforcers of policy. Drop the "y" and add the "e". Police, the policy enforcers.
@@The-KP Which side you talking about, as that statement can work with people on both sides. Hunter Biden due to his Drug issues, or Trump because of the 'lost prescriptions' of the white house pharmacy?
@@The-KP Or sleep with the Sheriff's wife. Or flip off an off duty cop who cuts you off in traffic. Or own land and be unwilling to sell it to the local police department for their new training location. Or do any number of other things that people *have* been wrongfully prosecuted and persecuted for. "First they came for the drug dealers, and I did not speak out -- because I was not a drug dealer."
@@The-KP You're right....because people NEVER get wrongfully accused, arrested, tried, and convicted. We don't have crooked police, prosecutors and judges.
Ironic, the police do exactly what they want whenever they want. It's a little late after they've already violated your rights. They investigate themselves and find no wrongdoing then the public picks up the tab.
Who justify the wicked for a bribe, And take away the rights of the ones who are in the right! those who turn justice into wormwood And cast righteousness down to the earth. They hate him who reproves in the Court, And they abhor him who speaks with integrity.
Not to mention break your stuff or keep it until YOU can prove that it wasn't used/procured in a criminal manner. "If you don't give us a key, we'll take whatever steps we see fit to get into it, and if we don't want it anymore, we MIGHT give it back to you in it's destroyed state. And no, we won't pay for its replacement, it's your fault for looking suspicious."
My “welcome” mat says “come back with a warrant or leve 4 plates”. And I’m the steel screen door is anther sign that says “come back with a warrant”. We also have that little “what’s the password door” in our heavy solid wood door.
You DID NOT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION. “Can they make you open the sage in your home” Whether they have a legal basis or not to access it, the question is can they force YOU to open it (for them).
@@OpenCarryUSMC It depends on the circumstances. I suggest you check out his video on police accessing your phones. If the safe uses finger prints, face recognition, or other biometrics. They can always push your finger to the touch pad for example. Otherwise they can't make you give them a code, combination or password. That requires you to choose telling them. Outside of that, they'll have to get in using other means if they really want inside.
@@MrPingn yeah I absolutely will not use biometrics for access to anything. Phone, tablet, safe, nothing. Nor will I use any safe that has a key. I’m strictly manually applied combination to a security locking device. If it’s just to “keep honest people honest” then a cheap lock with a key or biometric is fine. But if it’s for actual security from bad actors (including police) then it’s manual only and a locking device known for its security such as Sergeant and Greenleaf. I’ve see officer force a finger print or facial recognition unlock as well as taking the keys off an illegally cuffed citizen to open the gun safe in their home. And keeping the key somewhere else isn’t helpful as picking a keyed lock is quite easy. And it’s for exactly those reasons.
Maybe we need to change things. Perhaps cops should no longer be allowed to do searches. Instead they must report their suspicion's to detectives and in turn obtain a warrant from a judge within a certain reasonable time frame. .Asset forfeiture should be illegal and only used after a trial as part of a conviction. Highway police robbery and searches are terrorism. This must stop.
We could radically restrict these opportunities for illegal searches by outlawing police from searching during victimless crimes. Most of these violations occur during accusations of loitering, "being suspicious", unlawful driving, walking too fast or too slow, and so on. Require an actual, tangible victim before (i.e. murder, rape, robbery, etc.) an arrest is permitted; Government can't be a victim without actual damage to persons or property.
@abn82dmp We have had Common Law and, if 14th century throw backs like Qatar can implement Common Law, then the united States can regain it. We need only repeal our excessive legislation.
It's too late for that, because they have no ears to hear, and no eyes to see, and no covering for their nakedness though they claim otherwise just like before.
Laws, rights, etc., exist, but will THEY recognize it to be so. Kind of like, you're NOT recognized, even, if you're stating, proper laws in court, but you didn't pass or take the bar, most of what you say, WON'T be recognized, even if it's true, simply because you're not a "legitimate" attorney in their eyes. It's a way to monopolize and control with tyranny. Remember the U.S. CONSTITUTION limits the power of the government, do you think they want to adhere to and recognize that.
Everything is about THEIR discretion and recognition of existing laws. Remember, the U.S. CONSTITUTION limits the power of the government. Do you, really think, they want to adhere to and recognize that?
If you didn't pass or take the bar exam, you're not recognized, as a "legitimate" attorney, even if the laws you're stating are legitimate, they'll pretend, said laws don't exist and not recognize it because it doesn't benefit THEM.
Your missing one big thing that to fight just one of these charges you will be pay ten's of thousands of dollars. That's why there is so many convicted innocent people.
No, not innocent. If they found contraband during but there was a technicality that should "invalidate" it as evidence doesn't automatically make a person "innocent" given the correct defense. The person still committed the crime, they just aren't convicted of it.
@@Panchinator90 Absolutely correct! Note that at the end of the trial, the verdict is ‘guilty’ or ‘not guilty’. There is no verdict of ‘innocent’ as far as I’m aware.
He covered this explicitly: If the safe is on the specified property, and anything they specified they are searching for could reasonably fit in the safe, they do NOT need to specifically specify a safe.
@@thailine75 And then they will have to act like the criminals they are & break into the safe since I won’t help criminals enter anything of mine regardless of one persons opinion
It will specify what they hope to find, not individual things they can search. As this attorney said, if their warrant orders them to search for a thing, then they can search any place where that thing could be found. If they’re ordered to search for something that fits in your safe then they can search it, and they will force it open if you don’t open it.
@@shannonobrien9922If they are ordered to search for a thing, and they find something else that’s illegal, that’s ok. If they’re looking for documents and there’s your murder victim in the room and 10 kilos, that’s valid evidence. They might have to update the warrant or get an additional one from the judge.
If the search was performed by a department which has a written policy then SCOTUS says it IS authorized. I think their mojo is greater than yours and you will lose that battle if you choose to challenge it.
obstruction is a physical act, withholding information (4th and 5th amendment) isn’t obstruction. And please don’t have biometrics like face or fingerprint as locks, that can be forced
Cop come up to my door and knocks. I am sitting at my desk, facing the front door, reading. Cop can clearly see me and, if willing, can speak through the door to me. (Screen door, no glass*) If I want them to go away, all I need to do is continue reading?
Cops are nothing if not spiteful and vindictive though, so weigh your options carefully. Pedestrians have right of way, but if they carelessly walk into traffic, they are still roadkill.
An easy way to prevent police abuses of Impound Inventory is that anything found during that inventory cannot be used as evidence, or the basis to get a warrant. If you want to search the vehicle for impound and use anything found as evidence, you must get a warrant. Watch how quickly the numbers of these inventories plummets.
Also there's the difficulty of getting your property back. If that happens a lawsuit claiming property was stolen by law enforcement, sue for financial compensation and the arrest and prison for them.
A cop was towing my car for no insurance. He said he was going to inventory my car. It was full of tools and supplies for remodeling. I told him it would take him hours. He then declined to do inventory.
So Cal Deputy here. No proof of insurance is a ticket. Cars are impounded/ stored when the driver is arrested, the registration is expired over six months or for excessive parking tickets. So what were you doing because your statement is a flat out lie. Thanks
@JB-mo8rs The rest of the country is not your CA district. Most states will impound an uninsured or unregistered vehicle. Does not necessarily entail arrest of the driver. But the vehicle is not legal for road use.
@@tailsneon556 ofc California doesn’t tow for zero insurance, uninsured motorist the one type of driver that screws families more often than a drunk in a ram pickup.
We need to stand our ground regardless and be prepared to fight badge or no badge, you violate my rights when no crime has been committed or you are illegally trespassing, illegal entry, you might as well be a career criminal breaking in cuz you won't leave like you came in.
Cops can do whatever they want these days. Cops don't care about rights. Need proof? Read about Civil Asset Forfeiture. Now tell me all about your rights.
The officer teaching my gun class said he took the key to a locked box in the truck of a pulled over person and opened the box without permission. He found drugs inside. The person got off because he didn’t have permission and no warrant. Lucky for the person the cop didn’t lie when asked if he had permission.
@@gregfarnsley3851The warrant has to specifically mention the lock box/safe, and specifically what they are looking for in it. No different than a warrant to search you home, must specifically state what rooms they intended to search, what applicable objects in that room they intend to search(dresser/cabinets/storage tote/etc). Basically, if the warrant doesn't specifically say what is to be searched, it is off limits to law enforcement. Under just the plain text of the 4th ammendment.
@@James-t6q8x If the warrant is to search building A for an item that that is the size of a shoe box. They can search anything inside building A a shoe box could fit inside. On the other hand if they are searching for a stolen 55" tv they could not search the oven because it won't fit.
Sorry, they're not searching my vehicle without other non officers present with cameras filming everything. Maybe 6 or 7 years ago or here in Florida there was a sheriff's deputy by the name of Zach Wester that went to prison for planting drugs and ruining people's lives.
@@glasshalffull2930 well it's very difficult however I now have several dash cams and cameras placed throughout my vehicle that's about all you can do at this point
They already have it in their possession and so your ‘reasonable expectation of privacy’ is already gone. If you had a Rolex in the glove compartment, wouldn’t you want that inventoried just to make sure it doesn’t disappear. Supreme Court has ruled it for everyone’s protection.
Basically, when you are driving you have little to no civil rights which explains why cops concentrate most of their time and effort on roads and drivers
There are still limits, but a lot of frauditors and SovCits end up in jail through their own stupidity and their vehicle seized. You do have to produce license, registration, proof of insurance on demand, there are no exceptions to that in any state, and you have to have all 3 to legally drive on a public road the whole "traveling not driving" line that SovCits use is bullshit. Beyond that you do not have to answer any questions and for a legal search the officer has to have a warrant or PC that a crime was committed. A mere traffic violation is not sufficient grounds for a search incident to arrest unless it's something criminal like DUI or Reckless driving.
I see an issue with what he said. He said that you should say that you do t consentvto any search beyond the scopebof the warrant. Im concerned tgat if the warrant is later found to inproper, they will argue that you consented voluntarily to the search of as listed on the warrant. Because thatswhat you said. I would say "i do not consent to any searches, but i cant stop you from executing the warrant. So do what your legally entitled to do by the warrant, but understand that im not in any way giving my consent to anything you do. Make sure you dont say or imply that you consent to anything. Period.
Yup, just checked the Nevada statutes. All the cops here have to say is they're looking for an explosive device. Loophole crap that that can be used indiscriminately.
@PaulCavendish I see my answer was removed. I mentioned about police dogs and their credibility. I mentioned the false indicators and triggered indicators. That gunpowder is, itself, an explosive and if the dog indicates on a gun safe, or any container in a car, that gives cops grounds for opening the container. That the articuable situation can be falsely contrived. And has in innumerable situations. So, even if it's an illegal search, it's buried in the legal linguistics.
@@wisnermedia same with Colorado! There’s been a noticeable improvement in quality of life, aside from the equally noticeable Venezuelan impact.. Difficult to infer if our glorified hall monitors would’ve ever done anything about it, even with QI.
I work on safes and vaults for a living, and I've assisted law enforcement with warrant searches on a number of occasions. One particular case, I was asked to open two safes in a bedroom closet. (the warrant was for documents) Right before I started, the wife gave up the combinations. Don't know what the outcome was, but the defendant lost the ability to contest the validity of the search. Recently I helped execute a warrant in connection with a murder investigation. The warrant specifically called for a search of the gun safe for guns, rifles, shotguns, ammunition, holsters, and any mail with the suspect's name on it. I think they were most interested in a holster associated with what they suspected was the murder weapon. Got it open without any damage, and one of the detectives thanked me for ruining the confidence he had in his safe's security.
Policy != law. Institute for Justice of similar org needs to challenge this in supreme court, this is ridiculous. Write a policy that allows whatever and your rights are lost? Screw that.
police will handcuff you and put you in a patrol car for "interfering with the search" if you record them and there has been multiple times when officers went through a home with security cameras and "knocked over" the server rack or DVR where the cameras record to causing the drives to receive a major shock and be destroyed that's why only cloud-based recording ever survive, and now some police units are bringing wireless jammers so "suspects cant use remote tools or alert other people via wireless means" that also just so happens to jam the cloud-based services like nest and ring
Yeah, on the side of the road if you’re ‘not’ under arrest, you might be able to record, but cops aren’t going to let you wander around the house while they are searching. It’s an officer safety issue.
@@Zwischy I agree which in my opinion the government should be forced to pay all legal costs regardless of income, maybe they would think twice before arbitrarily going after people.
@@Tankeryanker339they wouldn’t. It’s the taxpayers footing the bill anyway. The only way to actually make them think twice is to take away qualified immunity and make the individual workers be held liable for their actions. Then no one would conduct these illegal searches to begin with because they don’t want to get sued
No entrance to Safe or House without a warrant. Not "stepping outside" to talk. Not consenting to a vehicle search. I want to call my Attorney...not saying anything more...
@ :57-(dont think this doesn't apply to the first :56 of the vid)- the vid shown was made on 9/24/2022. Stretch wrap became available in the 1950's. Crime scene tape became available in the 1960's. Writing on plastic was definitely possible in the '60's and printing on plastic was possible in the early 2000's. The police (all jurisdictions, Everywhere) have, and have had for decades, the ability to fulfill the requirements of the burger court procedures of 1976 without violating the 4th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America. The cars (with a nominal cost compared to law enforcement budgets) can be secured using numbered, printed wrap on the vehicles that would secure said vehicle to 1-protect the owners property while in police custody. 2- protect the police against claims/disputes over lost/stolen property and 3- if the police are worried about the danger of the car driving off on its own or blowing up they wouldn't be searching the car pursuant to arrest. They would be calling the special tactics unit. Bottom line. The police have the ability to secure a vehicle WITHOUT the need to search it, and WITHOUT violating the 4th Amendment to Our Constitution.
@@mrvwbug4423 which is to "inventory" the vehicle to protect the owner and the police against negative outcomes. What I said is true, lawful, and Constitutional. Unlike the 48 Years of illegal searches and seizures that the courts have allowed to happen. At no time was a warrant obtained (much less evidence presented-even to the courts) for the evidentiary procurement of the property the police could not legally possess. And by the by, the police have seized vehicles and not taken some people to jail. It was only After the (warrentless) "inventory search" that enough evidence was available to arrest said individuals. In violation of the 4th Amendment. By the by...
So you highlight a comment and then highlight a reply but when I respond it disappears? Is it you, the "tube" or the one that replied to me that has such thin skin they can't handle the truth?
My son had an accident in my truck, I was unaware his license had been suspended. They were going to tow the truck and i insisted on an inventory search since i had thousands in tools in the truck. The cop told me to get everything i wanted out of the truck.
I don’t know about you. As far as I am concerned a search is a search regardless. The police was able to convince the SCOTUS to allow this kind of loophole. There’s just too many leeway for the cops to find excuses and too many gray areas. Assuming the inventory search was done in good faith and they discovered drugs or illegal contraband in the vehicle. What do you think they’re going to do? Look the other way and pretend it never happened.
@@skippylippy547 we haven’t operated as designed in a century so no, & that is to all documents including the bill of rights. We the People got collectively fat & lazy together & We the People have to collectively start saying NO! First we have to self govern again. We can also research “Jury Nullification” which will dismantle the core power of the corrupt system since most laws are bs. We can collect hundreds of thousands of signatures or millions preferably & serve congress a redress of grievances & WHEN NOT if they ignore We the People, we can & MUST change or ABOLISH this form of fake government, which has been tyrannical for far to long. Also we can STOP allowing SO MANY to unquestionably state we are a democracy when in FACT we are NOT, we are FACTUALLY a Constitutional Republic! When most understand what we justly fought, died & killed to have & be a constitutional republic, then we can go down the correct path & operate as designed.
I wonder how often the police err on the side of civil liberties. They appear to err on the side of intrusion a lot more often based upon the number of court cases that have challenged their authority.
Actually, I know a prosecutor and we’ve discussed search warrants and he said he gets calls all the time for vehicle search warrants when the cops could use the ‘motor vehicle exception’ to the search warrant requirement. He has no problem getting one because he doesn’t want any evidence being suppressed.
They did this to my friend. They had a Warrant for his wife who had committed fraud at work. They arrested her on the side of the road. They went to their home and broke into his gun safes while he was at work. He had no idea it happened until he was on his way home and turned his cell phone on. They Ransacked his house and took all of his firearms and ammo. He finally got his guns back with one box of ammo per fire arm. They kept all of his accessories. Scopes, vest, extra mags, cleaning kits.
This is why you don't have a key on your person Forcing them to break the safe Which is highly illegal The best lock i have ever seen you got biolock protecting the key lock Cause government has automatic lock picks I had someone keep getting my trunk and was going to get safe I was told safe need be secured to frame, so I decided on cam and alarm poof no more
0:01 - Deputy Frank Sloup, a Brady listed officer, twice fired from previous departments. Once he lied about how a computer was damaged, leading to his removal as a Maricopa Co Sheriff's deputy. If you get stopped by him, IMMEDIATELY ask for a supervisor, and refuse to answer any questions. (I'm not a lawyer, and this isn't legal advice.)
These days, you won't get a supervisor, you'll just get arrested as a SovCit. The SovCidiots ruined that for everyone. You can ask for a supervisor, but you at a minimum need to provide license, registration, insurance then demand the supervisor.
Yes, a "troll safe" sounds like a fun idea, have a safe in plain view with nothing but either a funny note or random comical stuff in it to bait out an illegal search. If you have something you maybe shouldn't don't keep it in something as obvious as a gun safe.
In Tampa they don't need a search warrant to search anything you own .i had a judge tell me cops do not lie so no warrent is ever needed to search your home .
SCOTUS has said that cops can legally lie to perform their job. So, judge, if cops don't lie why would SCOTUS have said that? Every human lies to some extent. A badge does not change that fact Mr. I can't believe you are a judge.
Local police searched my friend's house because the door was open. They broke into his gun safe because "Presence of a gun safe is probable cause to search."
I have never heard of anyone being allowed to take video of the police conducting a search warrant. Most of the time they are either held outside, or locked up in a police cruiser. If there is any court cases specifying it is allowed, please get it out here for all of us to have.
The law should say that the inventory MUST be done in FULL VIEW of the Owner of the property and they MUST sign off on the list of inventoried items. Any dispute or failure to do so will be seen as a violation of the law by the police.
Thankfully I do not have much experience in this.... But your advise to record the police while they conduct the search.... I can see that going only one way..... The officers order you out of your own home while they conduct the search. Twice in my life did I deny Law enforcement entry into my home. and both times I had 6 or 8 officers stacked up on my stoop. They absolutely do not like being denied,,, and made multiple veiled threats (like... we will remember this next time you need help) So I can easily see your demands to video them (how do you video when there are a dozen officers all searching and tearing apart your home) your demands ending with you face down hogtied in your front lawn.
I look at it like this. My gun safe was literally purchased with the sole idea of keeping anyone that I dont want having access to my stuff from getting my stuff. I want them to have to work REALLY hard to get whatever is in it, so if that means them destroying my safe then GREAT, thats the whole idea behind locking something up in a safe. So if the cops want access to my safe then they will have to destroy it to get inside. I absolutely will not just give them the combination. My safe is not digital either so they cant just easily bypass it with a phone call to the manufacturer. Warrant or not, they are going to have to do it the hard way.
My neighbor where I live went through a similar situation. He was pulled over for a plate light being out ( plate lights make plate visable at night) the officer after running license registration and insurance wrote a ticket for the light. When the officer returned he had my neighbor step out of the car then asked to do a search of the car. My neighbor let the officer search as there was nothing illegal in the car. The officer during his search found a receipt for a store that sells archery supplies such as bows arrows and parts for bows and fletching supplies. The officer returned to his vehicle wrote some notes down on a pad then spoke to someone on the radio for a few minutes. The officer then exited his car handed my neighbor a warning/fix it ticket told my neighbor to get the light fixed then got in his car and left. Two days later the same cop now with 5 other cops show up at my neighbors house at 6 am with a search warrant to look for illegal "Ghost Guns" since buying a new bow string and arrow rest and 6 arrow shafts is apparently suspicious and means you are making ghost guns. They found nothing since the reciept was not his but was mine. He gave me a ride to the shop to get my things one day we also went to Cabela's for some new fishing gear. and stopped at LL Bean as well. The reciept must have fallen out of the bag. My neighbor does not own any guns or bows only fishing rods and fishing gear. My lawyer is dealing with the situation since a reciept for archery supplies is nowhere near making "Ghost guns" But the real kicker is I live 50 feet away from my neighbor and have guns ammo bows crossbows and all of it is legal including the guns that were made from parts kits and the ones with 3d printed parts all legal in my state. Maine has very few gun laws.
What happens if your wife gets in a wreck with your ranch truck totals it with 3 passengers and the local pd decides to take your rifle that was under the seat while everyone else is on there way to the hospital then you go to your truck the following day to collect your things but they refuse to give it back and tell you you need to get a lawyer if you want to get my crime report
I’m a retired cop. When I first started it was standard operating procedure to search all cars incident to arrest. The laws changed on that because it was based on a pretty stupid officer safety justification. However, after we were no longer able to search incident to arrest we just started doing inventory searches. They are pretty easy to justify. It’s just stupid bureaucracy.
I've seen videos where the cops say they have a search Warrent but refuse to show the Warrent to the homeowner. Some said they'll show it after they're done. Some also had lied and never had a Warrent. Others showed the cops saying its on its way but they don't have to wait. My point is the Warrent let's us know if indeed they truly do have a Warrent AND importantly tells us SPECIFICALLY where they can search and WHAT they're searching for. So my question is do the cops have to show us the Warrent prior to begin searching if we request it?
Sue safe companies who give LE “backdoor” codes to their customers safes. 4th Amendment violations. Also, warrants need to be issued followed per the warrant in the search.
@@soloflight75He tried to get the workers at Mar Largo to destroy the hard drives showing his buddy going into the rooms that the Secret documents were kept. That is no BS....
Jesus you fuqs. I'm here to watch a video about trying to protect rights, not read campaigns ish. I get enough if that stuff.. when we (the government) fight! The people loose.
I consider my vehicle an extension of my home. If you need a warrent to search my home, you better damm 3well have one for my vehicle as well or your ass out. I have the same expectation of privacy for both locations. The cop will be told 3 time that he/she cannot search my vehicle. If they insist things will get aggressive fadt.
Tell them with or without a warrant they aren't going into your safe. With or without a warrant they are not going into your house. If the judge wants to see inside he can come see for himself, he just needs to leave the cops outside.
This is stupid. They’ll just write a “policy” where they can search your house, place of work and by “policy” you now have no right to remain silent and oh yea hand over your banking records per “policy”.
About 1:11: Or, it was a deliberate search for civil asset forfeiture. That allows for seizing cash. After all, I've heard that at least one precinct (possibly in Kansas?) they needed a new frozen daiquiri machine...
what if i have like 200 boxes of jewelery, just metal and silver, but they all in individual boxes on loose, some closed and some opened, they have to inventory each one? and write whats written outside in case its closed and if open describe it? or what, in case someen complains the items are missing, changed or somethiong, they so lazy and dont care they wont do anything of that, someone may do that in case a weapon or drugs inside, they cant just describe to the book what they interest and leave the other 200 boxes aside because its a lot of work, that might prive they just wanted to search for weapons and drugs, cause they are lazy af
Whats your point ? so they come in your house and you had 200 boxes of cheap junk jewry and they didnt count them or list the invetory properly that now you get away with some crime you commited because the cops are lazy af The judge going to say your defence is dumb af LOL
@@jeffreyplumber1975 in the backseat of your car, that was the case cause they didnt search the car for the inventory, just for the drugs and weapons, so they dismissed the case against him, they dont make inventory of your whole house hahahaha but like he says, they do for a car, with certain procedure, guess thats not open toi the public, to avoid exploits
It depends on the infraction. DUI, Reckless driving, driving with a suspended license, speeding beyond a certain threshold are criminal not mere infractions. The usual way a traffic stop turns into an arrest other than DUI is people refusing to provide license, registration, insurance, though the people who do that usually have a suspended license.
In some state they made failing to use turn signal a arrestable offense and those laws are enforced until challenged and overturned by people that usually do not have the $$ to challenge. I don't recall which state the video was made but was verified by the on scene Supervisor but told the cop to not arrest the woman as the cop had a history of harassing her.
Some states class all traffic violations as misdemeanors instead of civil infractions. Any misdemeanor is generally considered "arrestable" if the cop "feels" like the person won't pay the fine or show up to a trial. There are so many loopholes intentionally included on the lawbooks that We really need to start over.
so posting prior to watching the video: short answer is NO, no warrant is no search, if you have a warrant, them you are free to do whatever necessary to complete said warrant, either way I'm not obligated to help you Mr . cop
New subscriber here... It is good than qualified professionals such as Mr. Hampton are willing to do this on the web for the benefit of everyone. I am hoping to see this channel grow and become the most successful one on UA-cam.
NordVPN: 🌏 Get NordVPN 2Y plan + 4 months extra here ➼ nordvpn.com/hamptonlaw It’s risk-free with Nord’s 30-day money-back guarantee! ✌
Would the "single container exception" apply for a locked gun safe in a vehicle?
What do you think about Indiana and it's laws regarding 2A rights? Any holes to worry about?
Using a VPN only protects your IP address. It does not stop Google or UA-cam from your search results or locations. You have to choose to Sable all of those settings, which 90% of people won't due to ease of the apps in the first place.
I have a pick-up with a utility body ( built in tool boxes, like you might expect to see an electrician or plumber driving ). So, I am wondering if the Cops could go into each of the locked compartments. The issue being that many of my tools could be misconstrued as weapons, especially my two machetes. Many other cutting implements, you could stab someone with a screwdriver. Hammers could be bludgeons. And so forth.
What if cops make you wait outside your home while they conduct search? How do you observe and video them from outside?
Opening my safe for strangers violates the safe storage policy😛
When cops violate the law and rights, they get to claim immunity.
@misteranonomous7717 Qualified Immunity for law enforcement, is only applicable if civillians can claim immunity for doing the same thing, for the same/similar reasons under the Constitution and 14th ammendment.
@@misteranonomous7717 I don't think the worms care.
@@James-t6q8x
Yet cops can break laws
Violate your rights and receive zero punishment
When did “policy” become law?
I completely agree - the irony is that the Supreme Court claims the inventory search is for YOUR benefit to protect your property!
If they find contraband, and I am charged, then how is that to my benefit?
If the search harms me, it is not to my benefit.
@@hamptonlawfirm
"policy,"... " police ... y". Somebody brought that to my attention recently, lol. The enforcers of policy. Drop the "y" and add the "e".
Police, the policy enforcers.
Nothing like the black robe tyrants creating loopholes to deny us of our rights @@hamptonlawfirm
When We the People started tolerating this conduct.
So what I got out of this: Breaking the constitution is a 'low bar', protecting your constitutional rights is a 'very high bar'.
and heaven help you if you EVER decide to actually protect yourself from these fucking Tyrants.
Maybe just don't be a drug dealer.
@@The-KP Which side you talking about, as that statement can work with people on both sides. Hunter Biden due to his Drug issues, or Trump because of the 'lost prescriptions' of the white house pharmacy?
@@The-KP Or sleep with the Sheriff's wife. Or flip off an off duty cop who cuts you off in traffic. Or own land and be unwilling to sell it to the local police department for their new training location. Or do any number of other things that people *have* been wrongfully prosecuted and persecuted for.
"First they came for the drug dealers, and I did not speak out -- because I was not a drug dealer."
@@The-KP You're right....because people NEVER get wrongfully accused, arrested, tried, and convicted. We don't have crooked police, prosecutors and judges.
Ironic, the police do exactly what they want whenever they want. It's a little late after they've already violated your rights. They investigate themselves and find no wrongdoing then the public picks up the tab.
Who justify the wicked for a bribe, And take away the rights of the ones who are in the right!
those who turn justice into wormwood And cast righteousness down to the earth.
They hate him who reproves in the Court, And they abhor him who speaks with integrity.
Not to mention break your stuff or keep it until YOU can prove that it wasn't used/procured in a criminal manner.
"If you don't give us a key, we'll take whatever steps we see fit to get into it, and if we don't want it anymore, we MIGHT give it back to you in it's destroyed state. And no, we won't pay for its replacement, it's your fault for looking suspicious."
@@benwagner5089; By definition they look very sus to me by their actions
I've had cops at my door wanting to come in and search a gun safe. I told them to f**k off. They f**ked off.
My “welcome” mat says “come back with a warrant or leve 4 plates”.
And I’m the steel screen door is anther sign that says “come back with a warrant”.
We also have that little “what’s the password door” in our heavy solid wood door.
You DID NOT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION.
“Can they make you open the sage in your home”
Whether they have a legal basis or not to access it, the question is can they force YOU to open it (for them).
I tell them to come back unarmed. When I can carry on their property, they may carry on mine. Never had one come back.
@@OpenCarryUSMC It depends on the circumstances. I suggest you check out his video on police accessing your phones. If the safe uses finger prints, face recognition, or other biometrics. They can always push your finger to the touch pad for example.
Otherwise they can't make you give them a code, combination or password. That requires you to choose telling them. Outside of that, they'll have to get in using other means if they really want inside.
@@MrPingn yeah I absolutely will not use biometrics for access to anything. Phone, tablet, safe, nothing.
Nor will I use any safe that has a key. I’m strictly manually applied combination to a security locking device. If it’s just to “keep honest people honest” then a cheap lock with a key or biometric is fine. But if it’s for actual security from bad actors (including police) then it’s manual only and a locking device known for its security such as Sergeant and Greenleaf.
I’ve see officer force a finger print or facial recognition unlock as well as taking the keys off an illegally cuffed citizen to open the gun safe in their home. And keeping the key somewhere else isn’t helpful as picking a keyed lock is quite easy.
And it’s for exactly those reasons.
Maybe we need to change things. Perhaps cops should no longer be allowed to do searches. Instead they must report their suspicion's to detectives and in turn obtain a warrant from a judge within a certain reasonable time frame. .Asset forfeiture should be illegal and only used after a trial as part of a conviction. Highway police robbery and searches are terrorism. This must stop.
We could radically restrict these opportunities for illegal searches by outlawing police from searching during victimless crimes. Most of these violations occur during accusations of loitering, "being suspicious", unlawful driving, walking too fast or too slow, and so on. Require an actual, tangible victim before (i.e. murder, rape, robbery, etc.) an arrest is permitted; Government can't be a victim without actual damage to persons or property.
@@draighodge6039 That is what "common law" is all about. Unfortunately we don't have that....
@abn82dmp We have had Common Law and, if 14th century throw backs like Qatar can implement Common Law, then the united States can regain it. We need only repeal our excessive legislation.
It's too late for that, because they have no ears to hear, and no eyes to see, and no covering for their nakedness though they claim otherwise just like before.
Everyone is scared of a 2nd revolution! This is why government keeps treading on us!
The Constitution of the United States supercedes any "policies" the police officers may have or comment on
No Charlie. That's not how cops work anymore.
Cops don't care about rights.
I doubt anyone in government cares about the bill of rights anymore.
That's a "recognition" issue, which is a, constant issue with the kangaroo 🦘 courts and corrupt system.
Laws, rights, etc., exist, but will THEY recognize it to be so. Kind of like, you're NOT recognized, even, if you're stating, proper laws in court, but you didn't pass or take the bar, most of what you say, WON'T be recognized, even if it's true, simply because you're not a "legitimate" attorney in their eyes. It's a way to monopolize and control with tyranny. Remember the U.S. CONSTITUTION limits the power of the government, do you think they want to adhere to and recognize that.
Everything is about THEIR discretion and recognition of existing laws. Remember, the U.S. CONSTITUTION limits the power of the government. Do you, really think, they want to adhere to and recognize that?
If you didn't pass or take the bar exam, you're not recognized, as a "legitimate" attorney, even if the laws you're stating are legitimate, they'll pretend, said laws don't exist and not recognize it because it doesn't benefit THEM.
Your missing one big thing that to fight just one of these charges you will be pay ten's of thousands of dollars. That's why there is so many convicted innocent people.
No, not innocent. If they found contraband during but there was a technicality that should "invalidate" it as evidence doesn't automatically make a person "innocent" given the correct defense. The person still committed the crime, they just aren't convicted of it.
@@Panchinator90 Absolutely correct! Note that at the end of the trial, the verdict is ‘guilty’ or ‘not guilty’. There is no verdict of ‘innocent’ as far as I’m aware.
@@Panchinator90exactly! Ur never innocent if arrested, unless ur a cop or judge! System is rigged and big brother is getting bigger
I wrote a POLICY... It said the Government can KMA!
I'd trust your writings over gov writings as any native American would...
I adopt this policy, support it becoming an Amendment to the constitution.
@@U8poxcoxin English please, word salads are ignored for the most part.
@@Hanibul_Lecktor
Ignore it and stfu then . duh
@@Hanibul_LecktorGet your lipstick.💄
The warrant would have to specify to check things like a safe
He covered this explicitly: If the safe is on the specified property, and anything they specified they are searching for could reasonably fit in the safe, they do NOT need to specifically specify a safe.
Warrants ALWAYS have to specify EXACTLY what they're searching for
@@thailine75 And then they will have to act like the criminals they are & break into the safe since I won’t help criminals enter anything of mine regardless of one persons opinion
It will specify what they hope to find, not individual things they can search. As this attorney said, if their warrant orders them to search for a thing, then they can search any place where that thing could be found. If they’re ordered to search for something that fits in your safe then they can search it, and they will force it open if you don’t open it.
@@shannonobrien9922If they are ordered to search for a thing, and they find something else that’s illegal, that’s ok.
If they’re looking for documents and there’s your murder victim in the room and 10 kilos, that’s valid evidence. They might have to update the warrant or get an additional one from the judge.
An inventory search, is an unauthorized search.
Exactly. Fourth amendment. Article two second amendment, no warrant can bypass our privacy rights and freedoms.
There's also castle doctrine.
@@PaulCavendish What does that have to do with the two previous comments?
I guess you weren’t listening to what the attorney said.
If the search was performed by a department which has a written policy then SCOTUS says it IS authorized. I think their mojo is greater than yours and you will lose that battle if you choose to challenge it.
I’ll risk obstruction charges I have nothing to hide but it’s principal of the matter.
obstruction is a physical act, withholding information (4th and 5th amendment) isn’t obstruction.
And please don’t have biometrics like face or fingerprint as locks, that can be forced
@@maxgorden499 I’m not an expert by any means , but ya I don’t use biometrics.
@@maxgorden499 Close your eyes if you have face lock. It doesnt unlock
@@maxgorden499 forgetting a code is my alzheimer's human right
That all depends on how a state defines "obstruction" not to mention the supreme Court said 4th and 5th must be invoked.
Cop come up to my door and knocks.
I am sitting at my desk, facing the front door, reading.
Cop can clearly see me and, if willing, can speak through the door to me. (Screen door, no glass*)
If I want them to go away, all I need to do is continue reading?
Yes. You can completely ignore them.
Cops are nothing if not spiteful and vindictive though, so weigh your options carefully. Pedestrians have right of way, but if they carelessly walk into traffic, they are still roadkill.
An easy way to prevent police abuses of Impound Inventory is that anything found during that inventory cannot be used as evidence, or the basis to get a warrant. If you want to search the vehicle for impound and use anything found as evidence, you must get a warrant.
Watch how quickly the numbers of these inventories plummets.
Also there's the difficulty of getting your property back. If that happens a lawsuit claiming property was stolen by law enforcement, sue for financial compensation and the arrest and prison for them.
Too bad the Supreme Court has a different opinion.
No Warrant, no way.
A cop was towing my car for no insurance. He said he was going to inventory my car. It was full of tools and supplies for remodeling. I told him it would take him hours. He then declined to do inventory.
So Cal Deputy here. No proof of insurance is a ticket. Cars are impounded/ stored when the driver is arrested, the registration is expired over six months or for excessive parking tickets. So what were you doing because your statement is a flat out lie. Thanks
@JB-mo8rs The rest of the country is not your CA district. Most states will impound an uninsured or unregistered vehicle. Does not necessarily entail arrest of the driver. But the vehicle is not legal for road use.
@@tailsneon556 ofc California doesn’t tow for zero insurance, uninsured motorist the one type of driver that screws families more often than a drunk in a ram pickup.
@@JB-mo8rs California doesn't rule over the entire USA, tyrant.
this is called a fishing expedition
So what?
That's not going to stop cops from doing what they want.
You live in a bubble these days?
I’m sick and tired of hearing how cops can screw over the public’s rights!
Get rid of qualified immunity and you got it!
We need to stand our ground regardless and be prepared to fight badge or no badge, you violate my rights when no crime has been committed or you are illegally trespassing, illegal entry, you might as well be a career criminal breaking in cuz you won't leave like you came in.
That’s why I never mourn their loss when I see a black band over the badge.
Just say NO!! They have no right to see what's in your safe without a warrant!! And they WILL lie to you. But stand your ground!!!!
The short answer is that absent a warrant specifically mentioning the gun safe, they cannot.
Cops can do whatever they want these days.
Cops don't care about rights.
Need proof?
Read about Civil Asset Forfeiture. Now tell me all about your rights.
If the gun safe is inside the location specified in the warrant and the items specified in the warrant can fit in the gun safe , they can search it.
The officer teaching my gun class said he took the key to a locked box in the truck of a pulled over person and opened the box without permission. He found drugs inside. The person got off because he didn’t have permission and no warrant. Lucky for the person the cop didn’t lie when asked if he had permission.
@@gregfarnsley3851The warrant has to specifically mention the lock box/safe, and specifically what they are looking for in it. No different than a warrant to search you home, must specifically state what rooms they intended to search, what applicable objects in that room they intend to search(dresser/cabinets/storage tote/etc).
Basically, if the warrant doesn't specifically say what is to be searched, it is off limits to law enforcement. Under just the plain text of the 4th ammendment.
@@James-t6q8x If the warrant is to search building A for an item that that is the size of a shoe box. They can search anything inside building A a shoe box could fit inside. On the other hand if they are searching for a stolen 55" tv they could not search the oven because it won't fit.
Sorry, they're not searching my vehicle without other non officers present with cameras filming everything. Maybe 6 or 7 years ago or here in Florida there was a sheriff's deputy by the name of Zach Wester that went to prison for planting drugs and ruining people's lives.
Exactly, how are you going to force the police to do this? Asking for a friend 🤔
I saw that shit too. Crazy
@@glasshalffull2930 well it's very difficult however I now have several dash cams and cameras placed throughout my vehicle that's about all you can do at this point
@@lpd1snipe 👍
Why should a police department have the right to make a policy to violate out 4th amendment
*The* 4th amendment, that explicitly prevents a governing body from violating your natural rights.
🤔
They already have it in their possession and so your ‘reasonable expectation of privacy’ is already gone. If you had a Rolex in the glove compartment, wouldn’t you want that inventoried just to make sure it doesn’t disappear. Supreme Court has ruled it for everyone’s protection.
@@glasshalffull2930 The vechicle is not in the state's possession if you're not in the state's possession...
@@zacharybennett3249 Darn, I wish all the folks who’ve had their car towed knew that!
Basically, when you are driving you have little to no civil rights which explains why cops concentrate most of their time and effort on roads and drivers
There are still limits, but a lot of frauditors and SovCits end up in jail through their own stupidity and their vehicle seized. You do have to produce license, registration, proof of insurance on demand, there are no exceptions to that in any state, and you have to have all 3 to legally drive on a public road the whole "traveling not driving" line that SovCits use is bullshit. Beyond that you do not have to answer any questions and for a legal search the officer has to have a warrant or PC that a crime was committed. A mere traffic violation is not sufficient grounds for a search incident to arrest unless it's something criminal like DUI or Reckless driving.
I see an issue with what he said. He said that you should say that you do t consentvto any search beyond the scopebof the warrant. Im concerned tgat if the warrant is later found to inproper, they will argue that you consented voluntarily to the search of as listed on the warrant. Because thatswhat you said. I would say "i do not consent to any searches, but i cant stop you from executing the warrant. So do what your legally entitled to do by the warrant, but understand that im not in any way giving my consent to anything you do.
Make sure you dont say or imply that you consent to anything. Period.
Yup, just checked the Nevada statutes. All the cops here have to say is they're looking for an explosive device. Loophole crap that that can be used indiscriminately.
Great 😑
That would be a false allegation, entrapment, illegal search and more
@PaulCavendish I see my answer was removed.
I mentioned about police dogs and their credibility. I mentioned the false indicators and triggered indicators. That gunpowder is, itself, an explosive and if the dog indicates on a gun safe, or any container in a car, that gives cops grounds for opening the container. That the articuable situation can be falsely contrived. And has in innumerable situations. So, even if it's an illegal search, it's buried in the legal linguistics.
@@alanrobinson4318 Metro will never skip a beat lol. Then again I don't do nefarious things
@@StanKing-k6c Hendertucky used to be horrible.
*I lost my safe while deep diving into a volcanoes lava. Tragic.*
How did your 200m lava safe diving watch hold up? Lol!
If the warrant doesn't say gun safe, kick rocks.
New Mexico also abolished 'Qualified Immunity'
Probably the only thing NM has done correctly, in a long while.
Which means the cop has no protection from liability from an illegal search, time to seize a cops house and pension.
As should every state in the country
@@wisnermedia same with Colorado! There’s been a noticeable improvement in quality of life, aside from the equally noticeable Venezuelan impact.. Difficult to infer if our glorified hall monitors would’ve ever done anything about it, even with QI.
Court is jist as bad as bad cops
I work on safes and vaults for a living, and I've assisted law enforcement with warrant searches on a number of occasions. One particular case, I was asked to open two safes in a bedroom closet. (the warrant was for documents) Right before I started, the wife gave up the combinations. Don't know what the outcome was, but the defendant lost the ability to contest the validity of the search.
Recently I helped execute a warrant in connection with a murder investigation. The warrant specifically called for a search of the gun safe for guns, rifles, shotguns, ammunition, holsters, and any mail with the suspect's name on it. I think they were most interested in a holster associated with what they suspected was the murder weapon. Got it open without any damage, and one of the detectives thanked me for ruining the confidence he had in his safe's security.
"Inventory" is a slick way to circumvent the 4th Amendment.
Cops shall NEVER search my GunSafe....!
Policy should not supercede the law or constitution
It never should, state and federal ruling that infringe on your constitutional rights are arguably illegal. Oath breakers the lot of them
Policy != law. Institute for Justice of similar org needs to challenge this in supreme court, this is ridiculous.
Write a policy that allows whatever and your rights are lost? Screw that.
I know that on tv police shows the homeowner is told to wait outside while they search. It's nice to know I can record everything.
not when you are hand cuffed and in the backseat of a patrol car .
police will handcuff you and put you in a patrol car for "interfering with the search" if you record them and there has been multiple times when officers went through a home with security cameras and "knocked over" the server rack or DVR where the cameras record to causing the drives to receive a major shock and be destroyed that's why only cloud-based recording ever survive, and now some police units are bringing wireless jammers so "suspects cant use remote tools or alert other people via wireless means" that also just so happens to jam the cloud-based services like nest and ring
Yeah, on the side of the road if you’re ‘not’ under arrest, you might be able to record, but cops aren’t going to let you wander around the house while they are searching. It’s an officer safety issue.
NEVER CONSENT TO SEARCH YOUR PROPERTY !...
Unless it’s booby trapped 🪤 with a grenade! 😮
I thought the burden of proof was supposed to be on the government? They should always have to prove why they did something.
Sure, presumption of innocence. But you can still have to expend a lot of resources defending yourself.
@@Zwischy I agree which in my opinion the government should be forced to pay all legal costs regardless of income, maybe they would think twice before arbitrarily going after people.
If you can't afford a good lawyer you have no rights. Rights are only for rich people.
@@Tankeryanker339they wouldn’t. It’s the taxpayers footing the bill anyway. The only way to actually make them think twice is to take away qualified immunity and make the individual workers be held liable for their actions. Then no one would conduct these illegal searches to begin with because they don’t want to get sued
No entrance to Safe or House without a warrant. Not "stepping outside" to talk. Not consenting to a vehicle search. I want to call my Attorney...not saying anything more...
So an outright fishing expedition, if appropriately written as a police procedure, circumvents the entirety of the 4th amendment. Thanks.
Protects your property.
@ :57-(dont think this doesn't apply to the first :56 of the vid)- the vid shown was made on 9/24/2022. Stretch wrap became available in the 1950's. Crime scene tape became available in the 1960's. Writing on plastic was definitely possible in the '60's and printing on plastic was possible in the early 2000's. The police (all jurisdictions, Everywhere) have, and have had for decades, the ability to fulfill the requirements of the burger court procedures of 1976 without violating the 4th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America. The cars (with a nominal cost compared to law enforcement budgets) can be secured using numbered, printed wrap on the vehicles that would secure said vehicle to 1-protect the owners property while in police custody. 2- protect the police against claims/disputes over lost/stolen property and 3- if the police are worried about the danger of the car driving off on its own or blowing up they wouldn't be searching the car pursuant to arrest. They would be calling the special tactics unit. Bottom line. The police have the ability to secure a vehicle WITHOUT the need to search it, and WITHOUT violating the 4th Amendment to Our Constitution.
The "inventory search" if they're seizing a vehicle is a search incident to arrest.
@@mrvwbug4423 which is to "inventory" the vehicle to protect the owner and the police against negative outcomes. What I said is true, lawful, and Constitutional. Unlike the 48 Years of illegal searches and seizures that the courts have allowed to happen. At no time was a warrant obtained (much less evidence presented-even to the courts) for the evidentiary procurement of the property the police could not legally possess. And by the by, the police have seized vehicles and not taken some people to jail. It was only After the (warrentless) "inventory search" that enough evidence was available to arrest said individuals. In violation of the 4th Amendment. By the by...
So you highlight a comment and then highlight a reply but when I respond it disappears? Is it you, the "tube" or the one that replied to me that has such thin skin they can't handle the truth?
Reminds me of the search and subsequent civil asset forfeiture of property from the U.S. Private Vaults store in Beverly Hills by the FBI.
Policy isn't law.. TOTAL bs.
I bet the cops will replace any property that goes missing after an inventory search with the utmost priority. Any day now.
They will almost never replace missing items unless it's court ordered
Can you imagine the number of issues if there were NO inventory searches?
My son had an accident in my truck, I was unaware his license had been suspended.
They were going to tow the truck and i insisted on an inventory search since i had thousands in tools in the truck. The cop told me to get everything i wanted out of the truck.
I don’t know about you. As far as I am concerned a search is a search regardless. The police was able to convince the SCOTUS to allow this kind of loophole. There’s just too many leeway for the cops to find excuses and too many gray areas.
Assuming the inventory search was done in good faith and they discovered drugs or illegal contraband in the vehicle. What do you think they’re going to do? Look the other way and pretend it never happened.
Cops, according to the Supreme Court, had every right to inventory in the vehicle, and therefore any evidence found can be used against you.
So w/out even watching this entire video which is a great video to do btw. It would be a NO without a warrant.
Do you think we still have a bill of rights?
@@skippylippy547 we haven’t operated as designed in a century so no, & that is to all documents including the bill of rights. We the People got collectively fat & lazy together & We the People have to collectively start saying NO! First we have to self govern again. We can also research “Jury Nullification” which will dismantle the core power of the corrupt system since most laws are bs. We can collect hundreds of thousands of signatures or millions preferably & serve congress a redress of grievances & WHEN NOT if they ignore We the People, we can & MUST change or ABOLISH this form of fake government, which has been tyrannical for far to long. Also we can STOP allowing SO MANY to unquestionably state we are a democracy when in FACT we are NOT, we are FACTUALLY a Constitutional Republic! When most understand what we justly fought, died & killed to have & be a constitutional republic, then we can go down the correct path & operate as designed.
Not even stepping in the door.
@@PaulCavendish
How do you think you can keep them out if they have decided to come in?
See US Constitution, Bill of Rights, item 2.
It will cost you, but somebody has to fight for freedom.
I wonder how often the police err on the side of civil liberties. They appear to err on the side of intrusion a lot more often based upon the number of court cases that have challenged their authority.
I'd bet on never
@@U8poxcox Same.
Actually, I know a prosecutor and we’ve discussed search warrants and he said he gets calls all the time for vehicle search warrants when the cops could use the ‘motor vehicle exception’ to the search warrant requirement. He has no problem getting one because he doesn’t want any evidence being suppressed.
Bottom line police can do anything, you have to prove they were wrong.
I think them looking at death in your hands would change things..
Get a warrant.
They did this to my friend. They had a Warrant for his wife who had committed fraud at work. They arrested her on the side of the road. They went to their home and broke into his gun safes while he was at work. He had no idea it happened until he was on his way home and turned his cell phone on. They Ransacked his house and took all of his firearms and ammo. He finally got his guns back with one box of ammo per fire arm. They kept all of his accessories. Scopes, vest, extra mags, cleaning kits.
Where was this??!
I’m
Speechless 🤯
Bullshit get them back
A person doesn't have any rights....some people haven't figured it out yet.
Unless your the police. Then you have all the rights.
Rich people can afford the lawyers to ensure that they have rights.
This is why you don't have a key on your person
Forcing them to break the safe
Which is highly illegal
The best lock i have ever seen you got biolock protecting the key lock
Cause government has automatic lock picks
I had someone keep getting my trunk and was going to get safe
I was told safe need be secured to frame, so I decided on cam and alarm poof no more
Kinda renders the gun and safe pointless now doesn’t it. Or you could just leave the gun at home. Both render the 2a pointless.
@oldjarhead386 no you get emailed pin when you get to your destination
Forcing them to break lock easy
0:01 - Deputy Frank Sloup, a Brady listed officer, twice fired from previous departments. Once he lied about how a computer was damaged, leading to his removal as a Maricopa Co Sheriff's deputy.
If you get stopped by him, IMMEDIATELY ask for a supervisor, and refuse to answer any questions.
(I'm not a lawyer, and this isn't legal advice.)
These days, you won't get a supervisor, you'll just get arrested as a SovCit. The SovCidiots ruined that for everyone. You can ask for a supervisor, but you at a minimum need to provide license, registration, insurance then demand the supervisor.
Florida law provides more protection on issuance of search warrants than the Federal Constitution does. Good video
I'm tempted to keep a locked gun safe in my car with just a note that says "Oh noes. Where is da pew pew? Ask my lawyer when they talk to you.".
Yes, a "troll safe" sounds like a fun idea, have a safe in plain view with nothing but either a funny note or random comical stuff in it to bait out an illegal search. If you have something you maybe shouldn't don't keep it in something as obvious as a gun safe.
In Tampa they don't need a search warrant to search anything you own .i had a judge tell me cops do not lie so no warrent is ever needed to search your home .
And it's possible he truly believes that, but he could also have been lying intentionally to you to see if you'd fold on that point.
SCOTUS has said that cops can legally lie to perform their job. So, judge, if cops don't lie why would SCOTUS have said that? Every human lies to some extent. A badge does not change that fact Mr. I can't believe you are a judge.
#2 The protection of police against claims or disputes over lost or stolen property? Cops don't inventory what they "lose" or steal.
Local police searched my friend's house because the door was open. They broke into his gun safe because "Presence of a gun safe is probable cause to search."
Looks like we live in a Police State, not the land of the Free anymore
I have never heard of anyone being allowed to take video of the police conducting a search warrant. Most of the time they are either held outside, or locked up in a police cruiser. If there is any court cases specifying it is allowed, please get it out here for all of us to have.
Guess it would n be time to remind them what it means to be a free man.
Definitely. Old time street justice works.
The law should say that the inventory MUST be done in FULL VIEW of the Owner of the property and they MUST sign off on the list of inventoried items. Any dispute or failure to do so will be seen as a violation of the law by the police.
Thankfully I do not have much experience in this.... But your advise to record the police while they conduct the search....
I can see that going only one way..... The officers order you out of your own home while they conduct the search.
Twice in my life did I deny Law enforcement entry into my home. and both times I had 6 or 8 officers stacked up on my stoop.
They absolutely do not like being denied,,, and made multiple veiled threats (like... we will remember this next time you need help)
So I can easily see your demands to video them (how do you video when there are a dozen officers all searching and tearing apart your home)
your demands ending with you face down hogtied in your front lawn.
I look at it like this. My gun safe was literally purchased with the sole idea of keeping anyone that I dont want having access to my stuff from getting my stuff. I want them to have to work REALLY hard to get whatever is in it, so if that means them destroying my safe then GREAT, thats the whole idea behind locking something up in a safe. So if the cops want access to my safe then they will have to destroy it to get inside. I absolutely will not just give them the combination. My safe is not digital either so they cant just easily bypass it with a phone call to the manufacturer. Warrant or not, they are going to have to do it the hard way.
I know guys who love drilling the crap out of safes. No recourse for damaged caused.
Policy is not law.
But the law is you must have a policy. 😂
My neighbor where I live went through a similar situation. He was pulled over for a plate light being out ( plate lights make plate visable at night) the officer after running license registration and insurance wrote a ticket for the light. When the officer returned he had my neighbor step out of the car then asked to do a search of the car. My neighbor let the officer search as there was nothing illegal in the car. The officer during his search found a receipt for a store that sells archery supplies such as bows arrows and parts for bows and fletching supplies. The officer returned to his vehicle wrote some notes down on a pad then spoke to someone on the radio for a few minutes. The officer then exited his car handed my neighbor a warning/fix it ticket told my neighbor to get the light fixed then got in his car and left. Two days later the same cop now with 5 other cops show up at my neighbors house at 6 am with a search warrant to look for illegal "Ghost Guns" since buying a new bow string and arrow rest and 6 arrow shafts is apparently suspicious and means you are making ghost guns. They found nothing since the reciept was not his but was mine. He gave me a ride to the shop to get my things one day we also went to Cabela's for some new fishing gear. and stopped at LL Bean as well. The reciept must have fallen out of the bag. My neighbor does not own any guns or bows only fishing rods and fishing gear. My lawyer is dealing with the situation since a reciept for archery supplies is nowhere near making "Ghost guns" But the real kicker is I live 50 feet away from my neighbor and have guns ammo bows crossbows and all of it is legal including the guns that were made from parts kits and the ones with 3d printed parts all legal in my state. Maine has very few gun laws.
What happens if your wife gets in a wreck with your ranch truck totals it with 3 passengers and the local pd decides to take your rifle that was under the seat while everyone else is on there way to the hospital then you go to your truck the following day to collect your things but they refuse to give it back and tell you you need to get a lawyer if you want to get my crime report
Where do those LEOs relax at the end of the day?
I need to see a warrant.
End of video
I’m a retired cop. When I first started it was standard operating procedure to search all cars incident to arrest. The laws changed on that because it was based on a pretty stupid officer safety justification. However, after we were no longer able to search incident to arrest we just started doing inventory searches. They are pretty easy to justify. It’s just stupid bureaucracy.
I've seen videos where the cops say they have a search Warrent but refuse to show the Warrent to the homeowner. Some said they'll show it after they're done. Some also had lied and never had a Warrent. Others showed the cops saying its on its way but they don't have to wait.
My point is the Warrent let's us know if indeed they truly do have a Warrent AND importantly tells us SPECIFICALLY where they can search and WHAT they're searching for.
So my question is do the cops have to show us the Warrent prior to begin searching if we request it?
I cannot recall the court case, but there was a ruling that the police ‘have to’ show you the warrant at the beginning of the search.
Do I have to open it for them, or is the expectation that they need to get into it themselves? Am I legally required to remember the code?
30 years ago, I was taught that when in doubt, get a warrant. When pulled over, park legally
never allow them to search a safe, make them get a locksmith.
They will cut it open if they have a warrant, then you’re out a safe! Smh…
or the bomb squad. Depends on the person.
Sue safe companies who give LE “backdoor” codes to their customers safes. 4th Amendment violations. Also, warrants need to be issued followed per the warrant in the search.
Liberty…
@@princessmarlena1359 💯
Soo cops just add this line to the policy, can search EVERYTHING if they feel they should.. Then nothing u can do...this is absurd..
That's when CLICK CLICK BANG BANG, comes in.
No warrant = no search, but, if warrant, does warrant list gun safe as a topic for search? If no = no search
As the attorney said, if the evidence can fit in the safe, then it can be searched. (Basically the same if a room in your house was locked.
"Open your safe" "Get a warrant. I ain't opening shit. And if you try stupid shit, I'll have your qualified immunity and your ass in a sling."
Keep $100 if pennies in your car at all time just spread around you vehicle. See if they are really taking inventory of all property.
Though I 100% support Law Enforcement, I 100% DO NOT support anyones Constitutional Rights being violated.
You have the right to record the search unless you are Donald Trump.
I call bullshit. He has cameras all over his place.
Pretty sure they were turning off his cameras.@@soloflight75
@@soloflight75He tried to get the workers at Mar Largo to destroy the hard drives showing his buddy going into the rooms that the Secret documents were kept. That is no BS....
Jesus you fuqs. I'm here to watch a video about trying to protect rights, not read campaigns ish. I get enough if that stuff.. when we (the government) fight! The people loose.
@@Omar_X292 Is that the bullshit lies y'all are trying to put out there now?
The door mat at my front door literally says "Come Back With A Warrant" on it.
I consider my vehicle an extension of my home. If you need a warrent to search my home, you better damm 3well have one for my vehicle as well or your ass out. I have the same expectation of privacy for both locations. The cop will be told 3 time that he/she cannot search my vehicle. If they insist things will get aggressive fadt.
No, just record the illegal search and get a lawyer. If you "get aggressive" you'll just be shot.
Tell them with or without a warrant they aren't going into your safe. With or without a warrant they are not going into your house. If the judge wants to see inside he can come see for himself, he just needs to leave the cops outside.
This is stupid. They’ll just write a “policy” where they can search your house, place of work and by “policy” you now have no right to remain silent and oh yea hand over your banking records per “policy”.
My friends and I have a few 'policies' of our own. Oath breakers won't like them.
@@ZekeRivers Have fun when the FBI kicks in your door.
@mrbugshit - We will enjoy meeting them.
Even if they had a warrant, I would never, ever open it for them, never.
No problem, they have crow bars and drills.
"Fuck off. Get a warrant."
About 1:11: Or, it was a deliberate search for civil asset forfeiture. That allows for seizing cash. After all, I've heard that at least one precinct (possibly in Kansas?) they needed a new frozen daiquiri machine...
what if i have like 200 boxes of jewelery, just metal and silver, but they all in individual boxes on loose, some closed and some opened, they have to inventory each one? and write whats written outside in case its closed and if open describe it? or what, in case someen complains the items are missing, changed or somethiong, they so lazy and dont care they wont do anything of that, someone may do that in case a weapon or drugs inside, they cant just describe to the book what they interest and leave the other 200 boxes aside because its a lot of work, that might prive they just wanted to search for weapons and drugs, cause they are lazy af
Whats your point ? so they come in your house and you had 200 boxes of cheap junk jewry and they didnt count them or list the invetory properly that now you get away with some crime you commited because the cops are lazy af The judge going to say your defence is dumb af LOL
@@jeffreyplumber1975 in the backseat of your car, that was the case cause they didnt search the car for the inventory, just for the drugs and weapons, so they dismissed the case against him, they dont make inventory of your whole house hahahaha but like he says, they do for a car, with certain procedure, guess thats not open toi the public, to avoid exploits
why isn't "(1) Locked Safe, condition: locked" the entry on the Inventory list? Sounds to me like they have no right and no reason to open it.
We've had far too many shitty SCOTUS opinions!
In England (sic) a request or question from a police officer can be seen as a threat of force, and may be ultra vires.
Except there's zero protection from unreasonable search and seizure in the UK, they can search anytime for any reason in the UK.
Traffic infractions are not probable cause for an arrest. WTF kind of shit are you spewing?
It depends on the infraction. DUI, Reckless driving, driving with a suspended license, speeding beyond a certain threshold are criminal not mere infractions. The usual way a traffic stop turns into an arrest other than DUI is people refusing to provide license, registration, insurance, though the people who do that usually have a suspended license.
In some state they made failing to use turn signal a arrestable offense and those laws are enforced until challenged and overturned by people that usually do not have the $$ to challenge.
I don't recall which state the video was made but was verified by the on scene Supervisor but told the cop to not arrest the woman as the cop had a history of harassing her.
Some states class all traffic violations as misdemeanors instead of civil infractions. Any misdemeanor is generally considered "arrestable" if the cop "feels" like the person won't pay the fine or show up to a trial.
There are so many loopholes intentionally included on the lawbooks that We really need to start over.
We have written our policy and it allows us to do anything we want.
so posting prior to watching the video: short answer is NO, no warrant is no search, if you have a warrant, them you are free to do whatever necessary to complete said warrant, either way I'm not obligated to help you Mr . cop
New subscriber here... It is good than qualified professionals such as Mr. Hampton are willing to do this on the web for the benefit of everyone. I am hoping to see this channel grow and become the most successful one on UA-cam.
Well if it’s a liberty safe they just have to put in the programmed back door code
Only if it has a digital lock. Some Liberty safes have the S&G mechanical lock.
Maybe find someone who can build you a safe. My grandfather built his own, it was very heavy.
simple awnser to the question you asked before the video even plays, GO GET A WARRENT AND TALK TO MY LAWYER.
I remember an "inventory" that was upheld. They found contraband in the air filter in the engine.
WTF does anyone need a lawyer for? We have no rights.