PHILOSOPHY - Language: Conventional Implicature [HD]

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 тра 2013
  • William Salmon (University of Minnesota-Duluth) introduces us to different aspects of meaning, as studied by linguists and philosophers. He tells us about the difference between the literal meaning of a sentence someone says, and what they intend to convey by using that sentence at that particular time.
    Help us caption & translate this video!
    amara.org/v/EpiY/

КОМЕНТАРІ • 45

  • @sundasmalik8588
    @sundasmalik8588 6 років тому +6

    I was unable to understand conventional Implicature before. Thankyou so much, you made it so easy for me to understand. 😃

  • @lucyjones6047
    @lucyjones6047 6 років тому +1

    My head was fried with this part of pragmatics. Your video is fab and I cannot thank you enough for putting this into simple terminology. Cheers dude

  • @anonimiti
    @anonimiti 10 днів тому

    I've been looking for the term for God knows how long!!! It was hard to look up because not many professionals know the term and it was hard to search up when I didn't know the term to look it up with. Thank you! (Third world country btw, not many are english speakers and not manh know the proper terms used)

  • @ammerahalmehdawi2080
    @ammerahalmehdawi2080 7 років тому +25

    You brought me headache .

  • @winkielee3038
    @winkielee3038 8 років тому

    Thank you. You make everything simplier to understand.

  • @malikakbar95
    @malikakbar95 5 років тому

    This is an elaborate way of explaining the difference between connotative and denotative.

  • @sujinujin
    @sujinujin 7 років тому +3

    It's really great. Thank you so much!
    what program did you use to edit this video?

  • @Mr01125499
    @Mr01125499 8 років тому

    Very well explained ! thank you so much :)

  • @aprilliawijiningtias5893
    @aprilliawijiningtias5893 4 роки тому

    Thank you sir you explain it in a simple way.

  • @magicaznkidz
    @magicaznkidz 11 років тому

    Hey Tshiung,
    I'm on the same boat as you! There are quite a few steps to get to before conventional implicature comes. For me, I had to revisit the beginning to clearly see the connection.

  • @Avadonia
    @Avadonia 5 років тому

    very helpful! thank you.

  • @aileenfowler3967
    @aileenfowler3967 2 роки тому

    I understand some and I need more information. Thank you for this video

  • @qldps
    @qldps 10 років тому

    Great Video. I found implicature and speech acts easy to understand in what I had read before,but I struggled with conventional implicature. Now I get it, thanks for sharing.

  • @DapperAF
    @DapperAF 10 років тому

    Thanks for this video. I was finding conventional implicature hard to understand and now I totally get it!

  • @rashshawn779
    @rashshawn779 9 років тому +2

    I want hit the like a million times. This was very useful to me. Thanks!!!

    • @WirelessPhilosophy
      @WirelessPhilosophy  9 років тому

      Thanks! You might want to check out this video by Karen Lewis on Gricean Pragmatics as well: ua-cam.com/video/we6uSVf4qss/v-deo.html

    • @rashshawn779
      @rashshawn779 9 років тому

      Wireless Philosophy I just watched it, and it was like a fruit juice. Mix of different fruits, but nutritious all the way. Thank you!

  • @ayaawamleh1299
    @ayaawamleh1299 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much!

  • @magicaznkidz
    @magicaznkidz 11 років тому

    Hi Darque,
    Is there something linguistically significant in your statement "I lost the game"?

  • @muhammedqasmallahabdulrahm4832
    @muhammedqasmallahabdulrahm4832 10 років тому

    THAT IS IT. THANK YOU. YOU DID A GREAT JOP BOTH AUDIO AND VID. AWSOME
    THANKS AGAIN

  • @sarahmuhamad8433
    @sarahmuhamad8433 7 років тому

    Thank you so much! It's crystal!

  • @Tshiunghan
    @Tshiunghan 11 років тому

    I'll have to watch this video a few times to understand the conversational implicature of it.

  • @sohailrazzaq3706
    @sohailrazzaq3706 4 роки тому

    Good, Sir.

  • @TobyKral007
    @TobyKral007 10 років тому +5

    thank you, sir. You did a good job explaining this

  • @babe720
    @babe720 10 років тому

    thanks for sharing. that's helpful

  • @kristinaanugerahaji9220
    @kristinaanugerahaji9220 4 місяці тому

    Good afternoon, Sir. Can I use this video as a supplement to my learning? Thank you in advance.

  • @meeyraalkhan2486
    @meeyraalkhan2486 2 роки тому

    clapping! well explained

  • @nelMB95
    @nelMB95 8 років тому +2

    so quick .I don't get any idea :'

  • @RAzMEy
    @RAzMEy 9 років тому +1

    MANY THANKS!!!!! Can I hit the like for more ten times? hahahahaha

  • @josespecial7579
    @josespecial7579 5 років тому +1

    I did not understand🙃🙃

  • @souadamar9505
    @souadamar9505 5 років тому +2

    U too fastttttt

  • @samar2416
    @samar2416 3 роки тому

    Why is he talk so fast !!

  • @desimunthe8595
    @desimunthe8595 4 роки тому

    It is to fast

  • @LoveChipbreak
    @LoveChipbreak 11 років тому

    It's a psychological game in which, when you think about 'the game', you must state that you have lost it. Once introduced to this, you are instantly playing 'the game'.
    There's some images around the internet that allow you to finish the game.
    I've heard that having sex and saying "I won the game" = game won, finished. Though I am not sure.
    Really, it's just a cultural play-toy kind of thing. It holds no value apart from relating to other people who play it, which excites people.

  • @futureDK1
    @futureDK1 8 років тому +1

    Vikings suck! Haha