Breaking The One Inch Barrier
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 сер 2024
- With the world’s current volatility and market instability I highly recommend you get some storable food for yourself and your family. It never hurts to be prepared for an emergency before it comes. I get mine from the largest and most trusted source in the market. Click the link below and take a look for yourself.
mypatriotsuppl...
Breaking past the 360-degree rotational cycle barrier to building a magnetic motor.
The 10 Most Famous Magnetic Motors:
• Top 10 Most Famous Mag...
Here are a couple of the best places to pick up a Creality 3D Printer, like the one I use:
Amazon:
amzn.to/2zXS2CX
Ebay:
ebay.to/2L8PCnH
Years ago I too was trying to do this. I wanted to create a similar effect as you described when you wobbled the rotor. I wanted to create a mechanical wobble that would be forced out of the opposing force to stop rotation, then reenter during pushing or attracting motion depending on the design. I regret that life has moved on and I have not gone back to my experiments for at least 10 years. I hope you find success and look forward to seeing more from you.
Thank you. I hope that life affords you more free time. I like knowing that there are others out there working on the solution.
@@Motionmagnetics Where do you get such lovely aluminum disc platters
@@Motionmagneticsdo you have any knowledge toroidal magnetic field?
@@Motionmagnetics It is physically impossible without a _dynamic_ magnetic field, of which permanent magnets and stable metals only use static magnetic fields.
I have a firm faith that someday somebody will come up with a prototype powerful enough to do work.
Great work! Thank you for openly sharing your progress.
Thank you, and thanks for watching!
Thank you.
We're waiting for better results and are supporting you. 👍💗🙏📌
Thank you. I appreciate that.
Excellent video. I like people that challenge the limits of conventional possible, trying to do what is considered impossible.
Never stop doing it, you give inspiration and delight to so many people.
Many inventions/breakthroughs were done by technical people. The deed preceeded the scientific explanation.
Just do it. Keep doing it.
Thank you. I appreciate your kind words.
I agree on not making test jigs so 'tight' - I often saw promising results with loosy goosy setups - maybe have springy bouncy jigs - it's just with PM's - especially super strong Neo's they just take advantage of springs and pull so hard as to lock things up - so you end up either trying to make a mechanical limit or just lock it solid again - man you must have a TON of magnets around with all those setups - I tend not to cannibalize my motor renditions (works or art - paper weights) and just buy more magnets - so I've got a ton also
There is no electron spin... The torsion field flows in a vortex.... In at the N out and the S...
use more than one planar dimension to take advantage of the complete field
Good work getting the full rotation. You are stepping it up on the 3D printing. Another person suggested Fusion360 I would second that. Way easier and free as well
Thank you! And thanks for the suggestion. Since you both suggested it I'll check it out.
@@Motionmagnetics I can second their suggestion on Fusion360. I've been using it as a hobbyist for a number of years and LOVE it.
Maybe this can keep charging a supercapacitor while it also returns a tiny fraction back to bypass each bandgap?
even running this setup on an electric motor will reduce energy consumption because of the pull push magnetic forces on the disc
An idea to make the rocking motion happen for a rough idea is to add half a marble under the spinning magnet table. And the other half of the marble in the opposing direction so that the half marble rubs over the other half causing a rocking motion. Try moving the marble half to see where the rocking motion gives you a favorable result.
As soon as I see your new video , I get a very good feeling ... thx bro.
Thanks! That's good to hear.
inspiring indeed!
I think it would be interesting to see magnets configured in a vortex-like shape, similar to how water looks as it drains down a bathtub. There would be more magnets on the outside, then fewer and fewer as they curve down to the center.
Fibbinocci spiral?
I think that's what Muammer Yilditz was going for in his motor?
@@Motionmagnetics My reasoning is that water travels much like electricity, and Howard Johnson said that the magnets have vortices in them, so maybe shaping magnets like a water vortex might do something. I've noticed small things build up bigger things with the same pattern, like how the solar system looks like a vortex, and so does the galaxy.
I reckon one way one can look at magnetic fields is sorta like tornadoes or whirlpools. Differing configurations can cause "blowouts" where it throws an object out of the field, but there's always the risk that for every action there's an equal but opposite reaction where a "blow-in" occurs doing the exact opposite that you want. Hence why, in my view, just a pure magnetic motor cannot work. You need a combination of things: Shielding, Gravity Spots, Imbalance, as well as Counter Motion. Then again, it was a few years ago that a university managed to create a magnetic "black hole" where a particular configuration of permanent magnets absolutely cancelled out all fields. If that's possible then certainly it's possible to generate continual growth patterns with a particular configuration. But for the home builder I think it's not quite doable unless you built around each magnet configuration materials that are either diamagnetic, etc--- to essentially cancel out different things. For example, glass believe it or not has magnetic properties, as does bismuth crystals, and as you shown aluminum. Everything to one degree or another has a magnetic attraction. I wonder, too, whether a temperature decrease (extreme cold) wouldn't supe up the magnetic fields too. Maybe the answer to the 1" barrier problem would be a small chamber of strong magnets in liquid nitrogen, forcing the object to pass through. Anyways, I'm just spitballing here, keep up the good work, Jesus Christ Almighty God bless you and Jesus Christ Almighty God bless your family 😊
Thank you. I enjoyed your thought process on that.
I believe the key is magnetic shielding / blocking the field in certain areas… Open up a mechanical hard drive and you’ll find material in there that does exactly that.
The aluminum plate is creating eddy effects on the magnets that are mounted on the white brackets. That's why the motor wobbles.
your problem is conservation of energy and losses due to friction, the only energy going is is your push, if you want it to spin further, you need superconductors and a vacuum to eliminate air and electrical resistance
Funny thing is you could, or at least you used to be able to, go to the Tesla museum in Serbia and see magnet motors run. Therefore we know for a fact it is possible. I wonder did you try these steps on a vertical wheel?
I'd never heard of that one before. I have tried a rotor with multiple levels/sections, that sounds like what you're suggesting.
When changing the magnet configuration on the circle, you change the friction on it's base. That causes it to spin differently far.
Yes. Every time you alter the configuration it changes the results.
@@Motionmagnetics That is because the friction on the axis changes, making it run differently far. You might have also started it on points of higher/lower magnetic potential points, giving it a bigger or smaller initial energy.
what i have learned from trying to build a magnetic motor which runs forever is that there is a
flaw in the assumption that a static field can maintain oscillation. I think there has to be some sort of
regulator (mechanic leverage or electromagneticnic or booth).
Think of it like en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell's_demon
I like your thinking on that.
@@Motionmagnetics thx, some more ideas for you, think about magnetic shielding (Mu-Metal, can be found fo free in 3,5" Harddrives from PC's) , also similar but not the same, "Monopole-magnet" configuration (Wikipedia once had it explained, now they claim its jsut "theoretical again xD, ah found it under the original name there en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halbach_array
@@Motionmagnetics i want to share this good video i found today
ua-cam.com/video/uQWHjj6ofwo/v-deo.html
HALBACH ARRAY, how to build + showing the effects
Hi. Try increasing the mass of the flywheel.
Well done Great work... Also try to put coils around the magnet and switch them open and shorted out and have a capacitor across the coils.. this could give the right pulses to accelerate them...and turn the disc into acceleration...
Perhaps I'll try something like that at some point? My goal has always been to achieve continuous rotation without an electromagnetic assist though.
@@Motionmagnetics Yes, but will be hard to achieve...
I guess the Russians have already got it to work in the infinitysav.com motor, if it is not a scam...but looks pretty good...They also switch and shortout coils in their machine, that approach the permanent magnets..
@@Motionmagnetics that's like trying to hit a golf ball without a club. The B-field is only one portion of the equation factoring into forces at play here. With the right stator configuration, a few well placed coils, and the right resonant capacitance to give the directionally biased oscillating E-field match your desired rotor motion and you can get the anomalous modes of operation you are seeking. I think some thoughtfully arranged electrets would also help this along quite nicely.
The only thing your idea is missing is some coated copper wire and a battery. Only then will such a device ever break past the "inch barrier".
Basically, without them (ie - copper and a battery) you will perpetually get a 50% pushing force, along with an equal 50% braking force (at BEST), which equals 0% output.
I know Howard Johnson pulled it off, and there are people who have talked about seeing rotary devices he built, so I believe it's possible. He was after the exchange force pulse though, which is why I mentioned that in the video. I've never seen anyone else use his methods for mapping and photographing magnetic spins though, so he had the added advantage of being able to see exactly which magnetic arrangements he built were tapping into this effect. The rest of us are trying to use math and/or experimentation to figure it out.
@@Motionmagnetics Hi, you say: "I know Howard Johnson pulled it off, and there are people who have talked about seeing rotary devices he built, so I believe it's possible"...
How do you "know" Howard Johnson puled it off? I know some people say this and that, but the proof is always in the pudding ("belief" isn't quite the same as "knowing") :)
Can you show me a working Howard Johnson model? Why have I not seen it? I've been researching this for a few years now and I've pretty much 'seen them all' (well, nearly I guess). I've tested a number of ideas myself, but I soon realized why it isn't possible (yes, I've lost much sleep in thinking this or that gizmo will 'solve it'). It is, as you say, the "one inch barrier". It goes with all such devices (eg - gravity wheels, where the exact same principle applies).
I think you are a talented dude, but I feel you might want to put those talents/efforts into making a better (ie - More efficient? More powerful?) DC motor, or something like that! This is what I'm 'trying' to do :)
@@jsouthern3838 ты парень не знаешь о чем пишешь! Что ты знаешь о Говарде Джонсоне? Ты хоть видел все видео с его участием? Знаешь, что он не собирался никого посвящать в суть своей работы?
Будь ты умнее, не писал бы подобный комментарий.
Ты и тебе подобные думают, что знают все на свете.
Побыл бы ты в шкуре Говарда, когда его гнобили за его выступления, может тогда бы понял чего-нибудь. Понял почему он не рассказал все, что знал о магнитных полях.
Таких героев как ты - пруд пруди. Это русская поговорка, тебе не понять. Были бы все такие как Говард, человечество находилось бы на более продвинутом уровне.
@@user-kv1wz9qq5q Покажите мне работающий мотор Говарда Джонсона, тогда я буду есть свои слова;)
@@jsouthern3838 не люблю повторятся. Если строить магнитный двигатель по потентам Говарда - он не будет работать. Понимаешь? В патентах нет нужной информации. Если ты не понимаешь что Говард подарил миру, я тебе обьясню. Он открыл Квантово-Механическую Молекулярную Энергию. Знаешь что это и как получить? Раз у нас идет такая беседа, значит ты не знаешь. Посмотри хорошо на изображения магнитных полей Говарда, может что поймешь.
Раз ты интересуешься подобной темой, хочу задать вопрос.
Возможно ли получить движение в замкнутой магнитной системе или нет? И конечно точки "входа" и "выхода" тоже пропадут.
Если ты думаешь, что возможно движение, тогда обьясни почему. Если ты думаешь, что не возможно движение, тогда обьясни почему.
Или не знаешь что ответить?
im really curious what kind of results youve had by placing the magnets that are on the disk so they're length ways instead of being placed facing the edge? i only ask because wouldnt that technically force the two magnetic fields to push away in the direction you're attempting instead of pushing away from eachother and pushing that one side of the disk toward the floor, which im guessing why its rocking when it works?
Mungkin permasalahannya adalah GRAVITASI. bayangkan jika piringan itu terbang diatas balok magnet, kemudian piringan itu diberikan nitrogen cair agar melawan gravitasi sehingga beban : 0,- kg
I must be missing something in your demonstration. The eddy current effect of the changing magnetic field inside the piece of aluminum would create drag that would slow the plate down. In other words if you use a non magnetic base plate in place of the aluminum your effects of eddy current drag would be vastly reduced plastic wood Maybe?
It very well could. That's why I rarely use that rotor, but I wanted to try something different and that was an easy way to try implementing a flywheel effect.
If you are sooo close to make them fully rotate,then why on earth we still don’t have seen a completed version from you in all these years???
It just can’t take forever,it’s 2022 so it’s time to show us a new and working one rightnow!
I really think a flywheel would give momentum to break the 1", also consider a set up whereas the magnet is attracted, it moves the above magnet (stationary one) in the same direction away, but not as fast, so that the bottom magnets are slowly catching up. So i assume gears would be needed, and here you can include an extra fly wheel. Though the momentum is lost from the high speed it used to have, it should still be enough force behind it from the fly wheel to break through the 1" barrier, and at least it guarantees that it moves a farther distance and if that farther distance includes getting past any of the 1" barriers then, it might be considered as progress.
Great video. Please provide some theoretical background and what you achieved in the beginning through animations perhaps.
Thank you for your effort to support who likes magnet systems
Imagine a bed with repelling magnets underneat along with repelling magnets on the ground , now you can literally sleep in the air.
Eh.. I'll never end up making it so heres my idea based upon the crop circles involving centrifugal force:
Place the magnets or windings in a fibonacci sequence as related to spacing/ grouping. First space has 1 magnet, next one 2, next one 3, next one 5, 8,13,21 etc
The counter-rotating magnetic array of the motor would be arranged in the reverse fibonacci sequence of the first one.
when you spin the magnet array it creates a whip like momentum effect for half a turn. when you have an opposite array spinning on the same axis the revving effect should be constant.
Ironically, I was just looking at something like that the other day, and there is a gentleman attempting to build magnetic motors based on crop circles designs.
why dont you avoid friction by making the wheel hover in air from a megnetic levitation system made from wireless power transmission or just permanent magnetism?
MYLOW TRIED. HAVE A GREAT ADVENTURE GOOD LUCK.
Love your work, thank you for sharing.
2 things I noticed..
1- do you take into account the flex of your gates? Motion is up and down while magnets pass.
2- as you say in the video about nature isn’t always or generally isn’t linear.. have you had experiments with Fibonacci sequence in mind?
Cheers
Along that line, I was thinking of an elliptical wheel or offset rotational center.
Thank you. I have done things to stabilize the gates before, to see if they worked better without the flex, as you called it. It's definitely a factor. I have not tried incorporating the Fibonacci sequence into my work, but it's interesting that you brought that up, because I just watched a video discussing that the other day.
@@Motionmagnetics Feynman's claim that "magnetic effects cannot be understood in an honest way, they are purely quantum mechanical" reflects a 'scientific cultural momentum' of discounting the presence of constituents of the Vacuum. "The Vacuum - space - is empty" is the convention.
From the start of my elecengr education I wondered why, if a primary of a transformer is fed a DC (not AC) voltage, the secondary of the transformer will exhibit a pulse of current due to electromagnetic induction. Then nothing in the secondary, even if the DC is still present in the primary.
In other words, the DC current in the primary is still present and the magnetic field around the primary that caused the spike of current flow in the secondary is also still present.
I reasoned
1) there was a 'shock wave' effect on the constituents of the Vacuum that originated around the primary and interacted with the electron spins in the secondary
2) so why did the electron spin alignment in the secondary go back to random orientation? You could say "thermal effects" but again the DC is still in the primary, with its fully established magnetic field, still present
3) something else quenched the electron spin alignment in the secondary, after the initial turn-on spike of DC, after that shock wave effect
4) the constituents of the Vacuum are randomly oriented and the vast bulk of them overcome the momentary alignment of spins in the secondary. This is why electromagnetic induction 'requires a changing magnetic field'
A physical analogy: a torch is fired underwater. A heat sensor is placed nearby. An initial shock wave of boiled water spreads out from the flame. The nearby heat sensor detects boiling water temperature. But the ocean's vast bulk of water is cold and rapidly quenches the boiling water shock wave. And the heat sensor detects cold water again. The shock wave is gone, only the very close proximity to the flame exhibits heat.
I work with a small team on artificial gravity devices and we absolutely needed to understand how the primary winding of the transformer was able to couple through 'empty space' to the secondary winding. And "magnetic lines of force" did not move the needle for us.
its funny how every one keeps trying to use the attraction and repulsion of magnets in a rotor stator set up and nobody but I, have used it roto-linear arrangement... just 50% of the magnets holding force linearily to separate two magnets... start thinking out side of the box folks.
It's funny also that different altititude and temp can also make properties with different probabilities
Yet you won’t do it. Easy to type on a keyboard and act like a know it all
I am impressed. I seen your video about the 3 magnet motors but I didn't know you did personal testing in the same field. I myself have not thought of designing a perm. magnet motor of some kind but I do plenty of labor on electric motors all shapes and sizes. I'm very new to thinking in this concept of motor but what would happen if you put the magnets that are stationary (the gate magnets I think you called them) onto another spinning rotor that moves opposite to the main one. could you design one that used 2 spinning rotors with magnets that spin opposite to each other. I'm thinking by not having stationary magnets in this type of motor would cause less drag in the magnetic field reaction for acceleration....Good Luck
That's actually one of the ways Howard Johnson suggested doing it. So your thinking is sound.
Best of luck, but why the horrible intrusive music? This makes your video look like a junior high school project.
It might be interesting to put some magnetic film close to the magnets to see the field changing.
I should probably do that more often.
A lot of ppl trying to build a “magnetic motor” but very few acknowledge the first and second law of thermodynamics. At quantum level ANYTIME a particle move from point A to point B generates heat, and that’s the first energy loss that governs our Universe
This entire assembly reminds me of Otis T Carr’s magnetodynamic propulsion blueprints and also the Graviflyer, a design of note and currently being studied on APEC.
Always a pleasure to watch your experiments. The wobble was most intriguing, and how you thought it improved your chances for a rotation. I wonder if a built in slight Vibration would increase success...
It was something I hadn't given a lot of thought to before. I didn't secure the rotor to anything, and the magnetic field interactions between the rotor and stators were causing the rotor to wobble quite a bit in some of the setups I tried. I was really disappointed that I didn't have the camera running a couple of times when it happened.
Looks real good. Thanks.
Thank you.
wait nevermind thats literally what youve done hahahaha
My brother mylow made a motor just like the one discussed here. And it was very close to Howard's
Try magnetic bearing for it to spin on
Try it with a pointy hat with "dunce" written on it.
@@andreasschmitt2307 ROFLMAO!
Love it man! I too fascinated by magnets and most interested in John Searl Effect Generator even thought a lot of people don’t believe in his design but its very interesting and I believe there’s evolution in these magnets.
Thanks. I find his work interesting as well.
With such technology , you can scare the shit out of those oil companys😁
Why use a complete aluminium disc? Try fingers individually in circle pattern or connected fingers on a ring so that individual fingers are affected by the eddy currents
Around 4:52 consider using horizontally and vertically protruding towers if you want to create wobble. Also, light leverage versus short-distance mass may be worth investigating with or without magnets. I have seen results similsr to one natural cycle without magnets.
can you break the one-inch barrier by using a vertical rotation and using a nonmagnetic counterweight in the right position to use gravity to pull it through the one-inch barrier personally I prefire a more solid state approach of feeding the emf back feed into another coil and stacking up the voltage by using a series of coils and using a timer controlled pulse I can eve dial it into 60 cycles per second which we need for setting up 220V in america
I recommend also using Fusion 360 for 3D designing. It has much greater designing capability and I started on Tinkercad and then started using Fusion 360 and it’s a good step up.
Thanks. That's a good idea. Tinkercad is nice but definitely has its limitations.
try the 3/3 method on the aluminium wheel, you`ll have the movement more smooth.
Well done. Well presented.
Thank you.
2 Static systems and one of them shall move without additional energy. Good luck. BTW an aluminum disk in a magnetic field is a disk brake.
People still trying to convert forces to energy...
Check out Coral Castle in Florida. The design at 2:24 I feel could function the same way. Edward Leedskalnin would hand crank his turbine to max power, and then the magnetic array was sufficient to provide the power he needed for “a day of levitating 10 ton blocks of coral”. : Getting gradually slower each time it passes the barrier
Pretty neat experiment, I can’t help but wonder though, if you used an aluminum ring instead of a disc, would that increase the effect your going for? Of course you’d have to have spikes of some kind leading to your axis of rotation, otherwise you couldn’t get it to spin.
I don't know? Interesting thought though.
Motionmagnetics years ago, was fall of 98 I think, I remember seeing a demonstration in my electronics class where a ring of aluminum was placed over the extended core of an electro magnet. When the magnet was turned on the ring was sent flying. I seem to recall that it had something to do with how a field would be generated in the ring of aluminum.
Good news...not only can I get a FULL 360 rotation it can run for about 3 minutes without any power. been working on this since i was 23 im 61 lots of proto types. I won't give up my secrets...but I will say...you're going to need some instruments so you can get specific readings on magnets. here's another hint...try ...and dammit I shouldn't say this...but...ok...try different angles thats all im going to say...theres also a lot more to it...but..you're getting there. I have definately achieved over unity...but...im working on something special. I have 2 3d printers and a laser cutter a big machine...my office is dedicated to this motor. pay close attention to whats happening and where it is happening...and keep tweeking. Im not giving my ideas away...i worked to hard on this....but...you're on the right track.
You worked so hard on this. Don't let it go to waste. Share your ideas and let someone with a different mind "run with the baton" possibly in a direction that will work. If you tried many things and are "stuck", share your accomplishments.
Does the ball bearing cause any drag? In trying to reduce variables, I have been using ceramic bearings that are not attracted by magnetism.
I always wondered if you switched from steel to copper bearings if it would produce a small electric charge this coupled with a Aluminum Housing to hold the bearings...
Steve-o that’s another variable that I have thought about too. I’m not that far along to add that. Maybe later. Lenz law causes problems.
You will ALWAYS have drag using ball-bearings (or any bearings). Even if one could escape this, even the surrounding air is a drag. I know... what a drag!
Using ceramic isn't a bad idea. The aluminum disc I used in the video is 18 inches in diameter which kept the magnets far enough away from the bearing that it should have minimal effect on the overall mechanism.
Why not make a near frictionless bearing using magnetic levitation or suspension?
My crazy thoughts are if you're spinning something and having that magnetic gate to get through what if you had a second layer of the whole thing with the gate in a different position from each other attached at the rotors
And they can each break the others magnetic gate with their magnetic push
Crazy thought. ??
I mirror your thoughts on that. One of my first experiments was based on that idea. I wish I had some video of it. That was back before I was recording my work. Perhaps I'll revisit the idea at some point, now that you have me thinking about it?
clean the flux off of your magnets by making a u shape aluminum foil covers for a small section of your spin after your last magnet and before your 1st see is losing that flux through the aluminum will keep your apparatus spinning continuous until of course friction wears you down
It usually slows the device down. I don't usually use aluminum for that reason, but I wanted to try something different in these experiments. I wanted to try a flywheel effect and thought the weight might balance things out.
Use an insulator so when the magnet passes due to repulsion the immediate attraction is reduced or negated
You talk a little bit about Howard Johnson. I've wondered if his successful motor design did something he didn't realize that you may be able to work out. I suspect that his use of the aluminum in his design set up eddy currents in such a way that they resonated. That resonance then ended up pushing the rotor through his "1 inch barrier" allowing it to complete the revolution. It would have been very hard for Howard, at that time, to measure electricity flows and accompanying resonance within that aluminum. I would suspect one would need an oscilloscope to measure this. I'm not sure if your knowledge/skills would allow you to explore this aspect in your designs, but it might be worth looking in to if you can.
I don't believe he used aluminum in any of his designs. He used metal shielding material but usually angled the magnets in such a way as to filter out any unwanted magnetic effects. And I'm certain he would have had no problem measuring the way that aluminum would alter the electron spins of magnets. He figured out a way to alter a radar device and developed one of the most sophisticated magnetic field mapping technologies ever created way back in the 80s. He was years ahead of his time, and way beyond the conventional understanding of laws of thermodynamics.
@@Motionmagnetics When I read through the patent the plate is described with the following. I assumed it was an aluminum alloy since it has a high magnetic permeability. Do you know more about what this material is? "The stator magnets are mounted upon a supporting plate 20, which is preferably of a metal material having a high permeability to magnetic fields and magnetic flux such as that available under the trademark Netic CoNetic sold by the Perfection Mica Company of Chicago, Illinois."
Magnets have force, not energy to move continuously anything. It's like a compressed spring- once extended, no more energy except if you use another energy to compress it again. To produce energy from magnets need other energy. Simple, isn't it?
Very good demonstration like the doorway method
wow i think its only a matter of time before you get self propulsion secrets from the magnetic arrangements..
.men in black entered the chat...
Thanks. I don't think they'd be interested in me. I'm not exactly hiding secrets. If you copied and studied my videos, I've literally shared everything I know about magnetics sprinkled throughout all of my videos.
the laws of thermodynamics and conservation of energy have entered the chat
Congrats on earning your
place as the next "Jean Louis Naudin" of free energy magnet motors.
Naudin is basically parendev. The principle is 'sliding over' which, if ever successful, has no leftover energy except that from the rotor momentum.
@@edsantos6627 Naudin was a prolific replicator and tester of other people's supposedly 'free energy' devices.
@@techstuf4637 .... correct... thats when I myself was keen on his dense vids on parendev and separately on bedini. I also explored kapanadze and jln improvement on the circuit. Well those are years ago. Glad to find somebody in this lonely road. How are you buddy?👴👴
@@edsantos6627 I could write a book, but you wouldn't believe the title, much less what's inside. It has truly been a Wild Ride.
@@techstuf4637 ... try me... unless that's a 120 proof shot.. 😎😎🤣🤣
Have you thought about two sides. Top and a bottom? Spaced far enough apart to not interfere with one another. Thus pushing each other thru the "one inch barrier"
I've tried things like that actually. The interaction between the assemblies usually creates more problems than it solves.
Gracias por compartir amigo, yo quiero trabajar en un proyecto que acumule inercia para romper la barrera de una pulgada como usted dice, el movimiento no tendría que ser solo rotatorio sino lineal combinado, un afectuoso saludo! Los imanes esconden algo
Gracias por ver. Eso suena como un proyecto interesante. Te deseo éxito.
i can’t help thinking aluminium in rotors or stators or frames can only have a detrimental braking effect and reduce efficiency.
I wonder if there is some critical mass of videos of guys sticking a bunch of magnets on a wheel and trying to make it spin that can be reached, whereupon the ghost of Isaac Newton will appear screaming.."Enough with the stupid magnets already! I figured out three hundred and fifty years ago that IT DOESN'T FREAKIN' WORK!"
;)
Every magnetic motor needs a human hand, based on the videos.😂😂😂
Well, that would certainly be one way to make them work. lol
Everything you showed has exterior magnets together, add 1 and space them out.
Armchair Scientist
An idea is that the rocking motion is a wave like Tesla speaks of.
Also try various sizes. Maybe half a shooter marble or half a beebee. Also take into consideration what the half sphere is made of.
Half a bb? Hmm. Hadn't thought of that one.
Have you ever tried putting magnet wire around your rotor magnets in a manner that negates the opposite rotor magnet
My observation : in my experiment I found a rocking disc gives you wrong results ... meaning , if you stop the rocking by fixing it hard , the results later are opposite to what we get when it rocks... you are getting 2 or 3 rotations because of rocking ... stop the rocking of disc and getting one full rotation would be difficult.
Yes, but I'm not sure the rocking is necessarily a bad thing. That's what I was saying in the video about always thinking in a linear fashion. Sometimes it might be better to do what seems unconventional. Howard Johnson once suggested making the rotor and stator assemblies both rotate around each other, rather than have the stators fixed in one location. I thought of this when I noticed the wabbling increasing the number of rotations.
@@Motionmagnetics I understand your thinking here, but there are other frictional effects of the rocking that make the rocking worse overall. Taking advantage of the 3d effects of the magnetic fields is likely an important aspect (probably necessary to succeed), but the disk rocking like that is not going to be the answer IMO. I made another comment on this video talking about resonance and electrical currents. The rocking you are looking for, IMO, to help overcome the 1-inch barrier is going to come in the form or resonance. A little will build up during each cycle (and there are several cycles/ways I can see it building up) and at a peak of one of these cycles it then gives you the push you need. That resonance, I believe, came from the electron from from eddy currents (in Howard's motor), but I can see other ways in which resonance can be used to break the 1-inch barrier.
Mount it vertically and use gravity to assist and or have a separate mechanism that is "charged" from the disk for stored momentum.
That's partly why I was using a flywheel effect in this video. I've already tried a lot of things with gravity in my last two videos.
@@Motionmagnetics yes point taken, what about stacking 3 or 4 disks on the same spindle and spacing the effect to pull it over the gate?
@@Motionmagnetics perhaps a sort of teeter totter system could be made?
When you can switch the field on and off, you will have your solution.
Couldn't you overcome the magnetic "wall" by placing magnets at the bottom of the plate where the wall occurs? Basically, you would want enough magnetic force to zero out the repulsive effect.
Hard disc dries contain the best magnetic shielding material known to man. I'm almost sure you know that, but just in case you were missing out on such a cheap resource, it seemed worth mentioning it.
I had some thoughts about that.
The energy needed to move the disk that extra one inch, especially while the motor is moving, is minimal compared to the energy needed to move the entire disk. To keep things going all the energy that need be added is that tiny delta. There are some fairly famous "charlitan" devices the included a hidden source of extra energy to give their device that extra kick and make the device to appear to be perpetual motion.
But what's the real goal? Is the goal to achieve perpetual motion or is the goal to produce continuous spin? If your goal is continuous spin, these devices are no longer charlitan devices as they greatly reduce the amount of energy needed from the mains or other secondary power source in order to obtain continuous spin. Isn't that a net win?
I'm going for continual motion, not perpetual. An added device would certainly do it, but I'd prefer to accomplish the task using permanent magnets alone.
Even though you admit you are aware your aluminum plate is experiencing eddy current resistance, you continue to use it - - - - rather than clear polycarbonate
Try casting your own alloys in a field, bismuth and iodine supposedly makes a strong diamagnetic field that you may be able to put to use.
I've done some work with diamagnetics, including bismuth and pyrolitic graphite. The diamagnetic effect is quite minimal, and I haven't seen favorable enough results to spend a lot of time with it. Good thinking though.
Have you tried several Hallbach arrangements, to make sure that the exposed magnetic field increases gradually as the wheel turns? Or possitioning them in spiral?
To help bypass that 1 in gap do you think it would be helpful to add a secondary flywheel? I would think that when the magnets are being pulled through the field it will move the second fly will so when you’re coming towards that 1 inch gap then the momentum of the second flywheel will force the magnets back into the field to be pulled again.
Great work ..........
Man, I dislike being the only one that mentions the laws of thermodynamics, but there is no way possible to accomplish this feat. Even if you think you had a flywheel effect, or eddy currents (which do not resonate with permanent magnets, and, introduce drag -- you wouldn't want attractive forces either due to a myriad of reasons -- so why not just use plastic?) or laughably spintronics, it stands to reason that your perpetual motion machine would accelerate, and keep accelerating, therefore accommodating useful work besides just spinning. What would be the source of that acceleration force? F=MA. So throwing pseudoscience at the fundamental laws of thermodynamics, doesn't break them. Lastly, your one inch barrier always reaches the same conclusion. it slows down. Even if you had a frictionless magnetic bearing, and put this rig inside a vacuum chamber, it will still stop. One more thing -- if you take a thick disk of copper or aluminum, mount it on a motor, spin that motor up, then bring a powerful permanent magnet near it, it will slow the motor down significantly due to eddy currents. Once you play with that, guess what happens to that torsional energy? I mean you were putting a lot of load on that motor. Well, like all wasted energy, it heated the aluminum spinning disk -- considerably. So all of these designs are easily proven to not work, either by fundamental physics, known applicable formulas (basic math), or just understanding the laws of thermodynamics, which are plain English, and have never been broken.
Now for the good news: I too, had ideas about magnetic rotary devices -- but a completely different approach. I would never call it a permanent magnetic motor; but not because any real scientists would immediately label me as an uneducated fool. But because it wasn't a magnetic motor. It was a mass orbiting in a magnetic, rather than gravitational field. It was a magnet, levitated on a type 2 superconductor orbiting an iron rod
normal to the plane of the superconductor. Launched by a very simple adjustable trajectory and velocity "gun", the magnet should be able to perform elliptical or circular orbits. Pinning causes drag; air causes drag. The superconductor requires refrigeration. Plus, since it is purely inertial, it would never accelerate by some invisible force you believe exists. If it were dragged by doing some kind of work, like generating electricity with a set of coils around its orbital path, it would slow down, and the orbit would decay; conservation of angular momentum would make it accelerate its orbital velocity, but move further away from the coils reducing the electrical output, also reducing the drag, still, stopping by losing the orbital velocity required to keep from just slamming and sticking to the centroid rod (or rods). So mine was not to break unity gain or any other sci-fi. Mine was just an interesting paperweight that required liquid nitrogen to be vented to continuously cool the superconductor, and, even a room-temperature superconductor would fail. Lastly, the orbit has already been demonstrated on a special magnetic circular track, and having the superconductor stay pinned levitating over the track. That does not need a launcher, and can accommodate variable speeds -- but again, still inertial, and even in a vacuum chamber, would stop from eddy currents.
So I am not at all trying to judge or belittle your fun. I love playing with magnets. But simply a little physics under your belt, and you will see that they are springs. FOR EXAMPLE: Why do magnets not get warm when you keep them apart, or force them together against the attractive or repelling magnetic fields, respectively? Shouldn't they? I mean you are putting a lot of torque on the atoms. Why does that not turn into heat? Again -- read the laws of thermodynamics. There is no work accomplished.
One more thing -- why do springs, when compressed or extended not increase in temperature? Because they are static. The heat when you extend or compress them, but once held in that position, they don't continue to heat. Why should they? Same reason magnetic fields statically kept in repelling or attracting positions exert a constant push or pull, but they do not get warm. Now if you oscillate push-pull, both springs and magnets would heat up. That's why motors require a constantly switched magnetic field, or an oscillating one. And that heat, is why they can never break unity gain. Period. Same with transformers. They do not work with DC, even though DC maintains a magnetic flux. Only a change in flux, like wires cutting through a magnetic flux, or vice versa, incurs and inductive connection.
My friend, look at it this way -- there are no monopoles. You keep cutting a magnet in half until you get to a couple of atoms, and you still have a dipole magnet. Further, when you cut a magnet, the two pieces do not just stick back together. So in a 3way all atoms in qa magnet are repelling each other. Constantly. So that's no different that two magnets being statically prevented from attracting or repelling each other, In other words, if that created useful over unity gain, magnets would naturally keep heating up as soon as they're magnetized, up until their composition's Curie point. It would be clean uranium lol. You are not understanding what a magnet is.
Well, you won't be the only one to bring up the laws of thermodynamics. Someone does in virtually every video I make. So don't feel bad. I hear echos of your thoughts constantly, and I appreciate you taking the time to write all of that out. I am not a scientist. In fact, I'd consider myself more of a tinkerer. I have read a bit on the laws of thermodynamics though. So I'm not at all unfamiliar with what you're saying. I am not attempting to build a perpetual motion device. Nothing man-made that I'm aware of runs forever.
I am always curious, considering just how old the laws of thermodynamics are, how the splitting of an atom fits into the conventional understanding of the second law? When you split an atom do you not get more energy out of the resulting explosion that you put into splitting it?
If you really want to understand what I'm attempting, read everything you can on Howard Johnson. Obviously not the one that owned the hotel chain. Johnson managed to come up with the most accurate way to measure and map a magnetic field that I've ever seen. Magnets are nothing like springs, and what I'm really after is the exchange force pulse.
Would it be worthwhile to try moving the now fixed magnets in order to make a slight unbalance to ease the rotor overcome the slowest part of the turn?
Have you perhaps considered the outer magnets to be able to rotate to create a sort of cog effect?
I have, actually.
wow very good work
Thanks.
Get on with it mate, my electrickery bills are getting higher
Am I wrong in thinking that putting the magnets (gates & table magnets) on a diagonal angle (opposing each other) , so as to push the table away constantly?
There are so many variables that could be attempted.
@@Motionmagnetics Have you ever tried it? I've always been fascinated with magnets & wondered why we don't use magnets to make perpetual motors...
I think the problem is that you're trying to get it to spin by using the gate method. If the top magnets (gate magnets) were free of other magnets influencing them, & you put them on an angle, then put the table magnets the opposite way (diagonally) on the table, you should get a more pronounced spin, shouldn't you?
Everything seeks its own BALANCE. Any action requires an opposite reaction in order to exist. However you configure the magnets and seem to get motion, gravity will come to play and balance everything out. It will never work unless you put in energy into it somehow. UNLESS, you work within the quantum level and change the internal properties of the materials being used. OR you work in sync with the internal forces of the material and gravity and get a more efficient system. BUT this requires UNDERSTANDING which maybe lacking and contrary to what is actually happening. IMHO.
sorry i just realized i didnt complete my comment, i meant why didnt you provide the 3d printer files for the c-shaped stator pieces you use in this experiment
What do you mean when you said: "Magnets are not static"? What feature of a magnet are you referring to...the field? The field of a magnet is static. You can, of course, apply heat or cold and affect the field strength.
I was referring to the spin of the magnet. Most people that are unfamiliar with Howard Johnson's work have no idea that magnets emit a spin pattern that looks more like corkscrews spinning in different directions.
@@Motionmagnetics
The spin you are talking about is just a distortion of the magnetic field and the field still remains static. Movement of the field distorts as the moving magnet goes by. Please correct me if I got it wrong.
There is always that barrier that prevents magnets from rotating endlessly. Did Johnson figure it out? No one has been able to replicate a fully functioning Johnson motor as far as I am aware.
IDK...very suspicious no one has been able to successfully create a working magnetic motor as described in Johnson's US Patent 4151431.
You seem to enjoy researching this so keep investigating.
Stay safe😷
Cool, nobody will get perpetual motion.
However if someone could make something that reliably rotated for a month or 2 and used no energy that would be a game changer.
Why not make a near frictionless bearing using magnetic levitation or suspension?
I've fiddled with that to some extent. There are people doing some interesting things in that area.
Design is important
One thing to note. You are fighting a few things the metal you have the magnetics on the magnetics you use and diameter of the wheel you might want to go with some plexiglass for the wheel some N52 NEO MAGNETICS and make it smaller so you can test just a few.
cut out the middle of the disc as much as you can to reduce weight?
I was going for more weight in this design to add a flywheel effect. I used a plexiglass rotor in my newest video. It just depends on which process I'm experimenting with at the time.
@@Motionmagnetics cheers