Kodak ColorPlus 200 | ROLL REVIEW
Вставка
- Опубліковано 13 жов 2024
- Kodak ColorPlus 200 is a 35mm color negative film that's super cheap! This film is warm, fun and easy to get good shots from. I'm taking a closer look at some examples and breaking down the characteristics you might see when shooting this type of film and what it's best for.
- - SUPPORT ANALOG RESURGENCE & SEE MORE FILM EXAMPLES - - -
/ analogresurgence
- - For New Analog Content Every Week - - -
SUBSCRIBE & HIT THE BELL 🔔 ➡️ analog.watch/su...
- - Buy Kodak ColorPlus 200 35mm - - -
B&H Photo
www.bhphotovid...
Film Photography Project
filmphotograph...
- - Follow Me on Instagram & Twitter - - -
/ noahender2000
/ analogresurge
Colour plus is SEVERELY UNDERRATED.
I do love Portra and Ektar but Colour plus just gets it RIGHT for my eyes
Totally agree
Just shot my first roll of ColorPlus, at the box speed, and I think the color and saturation are rich, warm, and close to perfect. I prefer it to Portra... but just don’t zoom in or heavily crop it, the grain is abundant and very noisy (color noise). Up close it looks a bit like a digital camera shot at high ISO.
Those rich greens really remind me of classic Kodachrome. I might look to shooting this in my WWII era cameras!
Color plus is hands down my favourite 35mm film
I like this film, I give away a ton of it as its great to give someone a roll that kinda wants to use their old camera in storage, give them a roll of this to push them into sbootint film again. I also buy a lot of this for my wife who is perfectly happy with cheap film. Its very close to 200 gold.
I love colorplus, it's one of the films I use all the time when I'm shooting photos
Also, I really wish they made this film in 120
Some say it lacks some silver which influences the films look.
However, as with most color films it plays nicely when being shot at Iso 100 and processed normally. Shifts the colours and gives a pastel look.
So you mean setting the camera to 100 iso and then not telling them to push/pull when developing? Wouldn't that cause bad exposures? I'm a total newbie :)
@@AnchorTH that would overexpose it. But from what i've read and seen, it results into a soft and pastel-ish look --- which i personally like. It depends on lighting conditions though i believe. About to shoot my first colorplus 200 in the coming weeks. this pandemic is delaying the arrival of my films and it sucks tss
OOOOOOOOOH YEAH, bought a roll of it last week cant wait to shoot with it!
r u satisfied
Colorplus 200 and Fujicolor C200 are amazing low budget films that never fail. I saw many beautiful shots on C200 or Colorplus 200 that looked more like Portra stuff!
I’d be really curious to hear your thoughts on TMAX 400. For my photography class in university, we’re shooting on various types of black and white 35mm film, and that’s the one I’ve settled into the most, I just love how tight the grain is while giving me a pretty good range with my exposures
It's a wonderful film! Really loved the results, when pushed +1 stop: an overcast day gave pleasing pastel colors, while in the night the different colored lights had nice contrast and deep colors. I liked the results of pushed ColorPlus 200 a bit more than the Kodak Ultramax 400.
Did you have it processed normally or did you asked your lab to have it pushed +1?
@@DrunkMessi Yes, I asked the lab to push it +1 for processing
Its a fun pharmacy film, I like the warmer tones but the grain is sometimes a bit too obvious.
Nicos Photography Show, isn’t grain one of the reasons why we shoot film instead of digital?
Im so glad i found your channel! You have great content very informative for beginners like meee
Love your vids, man. Great info 👍
My favourite film stock!
Great video, i recently found a bunch of negatives from my fathers childhood, that were in fact all shot on either this, or Agfa Chrome! Super cool!
But i was thinking, next time you could maybe do an APS roll? ;D
If you mean Advantix film, it doesn’t exist anymore
Great video. I use this film with great results. Keep up the good work Noah 😀
I love ColorPlus , Lomography 800 is my second favorite film and i really like their B&W films , especially Lady Gray!
Love these roll reviews! Please do more!
Hi, Noah
I need your invaluable advice: I found a 120 roll film, Kodak Verichrome PAN, ISO 125 [june 1977!!!...].
What I do? I load it into the camera, or I keep it as a collector's item?...
Which chemical development is suitable?
I hope in your precious answer!
Infinitely thanks!
Greetings
My local photo developing and printing lab has this filmstock and fujis c200 on the counter as well as Tri-X and Tmax
I just bought 10 rolls of ColorPlus because of the low price, but for me at least, I'd rather spend that extra dollar and get something like Gold 200, Ultramax 400 or Fujicolor C200. This film is grainy AF (and AF is not autofocus in this context). It also shifts alot to green in indoor situations, which is where I shoot most of my pictures at the moment as Norway is in it's darkest part of the year. I haven't tried it outdoor in daylight yet, but unless that works out completely different I won't be ordering any more ColorPlus. Out of the consumer films I've tried this is the one I liked the least, so I would rather spend the small extra cost for a roll which produces colors I actually likes :)
"It's so cheap" Currently $44 a 24 exp roll at Walmart.
Always keep a stock of film on hand for when shortages and price gouging starts.
Nowadays, well at my country, "cheap film" is currently a kodak vision, and color plus / gold costs twice as that...
despite being cheap consumer film, i look at colorplus as something kinda premium)
Really nice to see a film photography youtuber based in Toronto! I recently stocked up at Downtown Camera on colorplus and ultramax. I'm hoping to shoot some winter scenes, but I'm not sure which film stock out of the two would be best. I'm afraid that colorplus is too warm and might not render the snow well. I also have some fuji susperia. Basically, I'm wondering which drugstore grade film would be best for snow and winter
Well they've both got some specific looks to them for sure! Snow can be something that throws things off a little bit because you can see the color shift so clearly, but if your exposure is good then you can get do some editing and get things looking a little better. I'm partial to ColorPlus overall but it is warmer then Superia for sure and you may have better luck with that. If you're going by a light meter for your exposures with heavy snow scenes it's good to over-expose the film by 1 or 2 stops as well!
@@AnalogResurgence That's really helpful thanks so much for the reply! I've had less experience with ColorPlus, so I think I'm going to go with that in order to try something new and see how it goes
honestly, great review.
Sounds wonderful and very different from Superia 400. I've long had an aversion to buying 200 films because I felt whatever the situation, 100 or 400 could do it better, but I may have to try some if it's the only Kodak film I can afford at the moment.
do a video about the KODAK M35 Film Camera
I used to buy ten rolls at once so that it worked out as cheaply as possible (£2.70 for a 36exp roll). Good stuff
lol same!
What's the best shutter speed for this film??
you should dabble in VHS camcording. from what ive heard its inexpensive to get into and formatting it to digital can be done easily at home.
Midnight Chaser I already do this. It’s so much fun. Plus you are doing your thing for the planet by recycling 😀
Some would say that it's more of a 100 speed film. However, what is not in doubt is that it looks absolutely fantastic. Better than Portra 400, for sure. Though you can't beat Portra for low light these days.
Killer info thanks! Slow them hands chief :)
ColorPlus is King
Could you theoretically create a adapter for a 120 Kodak brownie like a newer no.2 to allow you to hold something in the range of 50 ft of 120 film and that would also automatically allow you to hold down the shutter and advance the film at the same time using batteries, to create something like a continuous exposure video camera, therefore creating one giant frame of film.
I'm having a hard time choosing between gold and color plus. They are so similar.
I’d say get whatever is cheaper atm. The real standouts in this category are Ultramax 400 and Proimage 100.
What shutter speed did you use for this? Or what would you recommend
I have an Olympus mju II which is like 15 years old. Will it work if I insert a reel into it?
Being used to the look of Kodak GOLD from all my childhood photos the grain of Kodak ColorPlus feels like a punch in the eyes.
Gold is hardly grainless.
Man there is nothing like CHEAP FILM anymore!!
Can you do a review of Kodak vs ILFORD black and white films
Agree, totally a good idea! :)
A really good idea 👍
That red and yellow box is a Kodachrome teaser. If only...
Hello Noah! how are you? please could you help me? I set up an analog animation studio, we let's do everything as before.....from hand painted acetates to filming, let's do everything in super 8, I have a canon 814 with single frame remote that is working perfectly. my doubt is about the negative film....I dont know which would be the best film for this project, I bought some Kodak 500t cartridges, but they are for low light, the capture will be in a dark room, but my capture rostrum has two orange lamps that will do the lighting, i'm honestly lost, i think i bought the wrong negative .... what do you think?
thank you
Sonny
How does it compare to Kodak gold 200?
It's essentially an older form of gold. It's super warm and less saturated than gold, a little more grainy too
next fuji c200 please
I really like the real film look - to me it’s much better than Porta or ektar.
Can you do a review of CineStill in both 35mm and 120 film?
I shot Colorplus 200 at 100 iso on a pretty clear sky sunny day . Should I tell them to pull a stop or leave it at that ?
It's likely okay! 1 stop over-exposure is fine
Analog Resurgence Thanks man !! Appreciate it
Test Ilford Black and White film
Gold costs just a tiny bit more and is actually a very decent film.
Same with Fuji 200C quite a bit better and almost the same price.
So I’d only shoot CC if I really, really wanted that 70s - 80s cheap ass family vacation look.
So I tried shooting 100 iso on 200 colorplus should I tell the ppl at labs to develop normally or tell them I pulled a stop
HardLine did you accidentally do 100 iso or was it purposeful? Also is this roll important or like experimental with the film?
Just have them dev it normally. By shooting at ISO 100 on a 200 ISO film, you've actually overexposed the film by a stop. Colour negative film tends to quite like a little bit of overexposure so your shots should turn out okay for the most part.
Thanks for the Tip Noah! Great assessment.
How do you scan your film?
I think It would be great if you could review another cheap film - Fujicolor C200 🤗
I actually shoot this in a studio...back idea
hi i am from the future. this film now cost 16.99 Dollars a Roll. this didn't age well
lomo metropolis?
Just picked up a roll!
Please make it in 120 kodak!
Not likely, they only do that for their professional films
“Cheap and charming”. Sounds like me
u r jay baruchel
"It's cheap!"...8.50 a roll...might as well spend the 1.50 at this point and just buy portra.
Keep in mind I was speaking in Canadian prices. 9.50 now for colorplus vs $18 for Portra here definitely makes it cheaper by comparison. Even in USD colorplus will run like $6 usually with portra closer to $10.
@@AnalogResurgence JESUSSSSS I feel bad for you Maple drinkers. :( 18 bucks for portra?!?!?! Colorplus at local shop here is about 8.50.
Colourplus just gets the works done, wich is not an obvious thing.
parkinson?
No downsides ? No analysis of any kind ? ...
I usually love your videos because you go the extra mile, but here...
you move too much