Goodness, this is going to take a few goes to get through. Niqab's self aggrandising, pretentious manner is like fingernails on a chalkboard. Thank you for reposting, though, it's necessary research.
From analyzing this discussion and from someone who has looked into the nature of the qirat/preservation of the quran, here are my thoughts: i gotta say that you guys cannot comprehend the discussion at all probably due to you lack of understanding of the science of the qirat as Sheikh Yasir mentioned!! Firsltly, it is clear that Dr Yasir Qahdi holds that the quran is preserved!! He stated this multiple times throughout the interview. Espicially the last part of the discussion where he says that he holds that the quran we have is munazal (revelaed) and is preserved!! But now there are ambigious statements which must be understood in light of the context and clear statements where he expressed his view that the quran is preserved!! * Btw this exact skill of analyzing statements through a methedology to arrive at a ruling is another science in islam called usul al fiqh !! Therefore by logical necessity, these other ambigious statements cannot imply that he holds that the quran is not preserved!! Secondly, let us understand his statements in light and context of a deeper understanding of the quranic sciences. - Regarding "the standard narrative have holes in it" Dr Yasir was clearly refering to a deeper discussion regarding the various opinions on the nature and whateness of the ahruf!! There are at least 40 opinions/viewpoints on this matter as recorded and stated by imam suyuti (15th century) in Al-Itqan fi `Ulum al-Qur'an (Precision and Mastery in the Sciences of the Qur'an). There are certain opinions of what constitutes an ahruf which are more "mainstream/standard" than others. But in Sheikh Yasir Qahdi's view, these opinions do not have the best explanatory scope!! Many opinions exist on the spectrum off the top of my head like the ahruf are dialects of the arabs or the ahruf or The ahruf are seven types of verses in the Qur'an: apparent, command, recommendation, specific, particular, general and parable, or Differences in pronunciation etc. It seems one of the strongest out of the various opinions would be that the differences of the ahruf refer to "categories of difference" like one ahruf maybe about different ways to pronounce, or another harf is a different grammatical state, or another harf is a dialectual difference, or change in word etc. thirdly, why Dr Qahdi took down the video is not to bring confusion to people as the statements made were very nuanced and complex which could confuse those not fammiliar with the discussion or some pre-requisite knowledge!! - Also other statements like regarding the blank quran by Sheikh Qadi is also a nuanced point where if one understands the pre-requisite of the question, he would not be confused at all!! To put it simply, we cannot in one full sitting get the "exact" order of variants that the prophet (saw) read as the ahruf that exist (in the ten qirat standardized later) are all mixed!! We do not have 1 exact ahruf in a pure form!! Maybe this question is nonsensical if we take the above view of what the essence of the ahruf are. Therefore the end off, I feel that all these islamaphobes just were too desperate to just hit islam with something!! I feel that my explanation is rationally justified as I took both the clear/explicit statements and the ambigious statements into factor unlike the contrary view!!
@@KevinSmile No, the claim of Yasir Qadhi just strenghtened the authencity of the Quran. In other hand, your NT is in every point, every sphere an anonimous, corrupt and contradiction book.
From analyzing this discussion and from someone who has looked into the nature of the qirat/preservation of the quran, here are my thoughts: i gotta say that you guys cannot comprehend the discussion at all probably due to you lack of understanding of the science of the qirat as Sheikh Yasir mentioned!! Firsltly, it is clear that Dr Yasir Qahdi holds that the quran is preserved!! He stated this multiple times throughout the interview. Espicially the last part of the discussion where he says that he holds that the quran we have is munazal (revelaed) and is preserved!! But now there are ambigious statements which must be understood in light of the context and clear statements where he expressed his view that the quran is preserved!! * Btw this exact skill of analyzing statements through a methedology to arrive at a ruling is another science in islam called usul al fiqh !! Therefore by logical necessity, these other ambigious statements cannot imply that he holds that the quran is not preserved!! Secondly, let us understand his statements in light and context of a deeper understanding of the quranic sciences. - Regarding "the standard narrative have holes in it" Dr Yasir was clearly refering to a deeper discussion regarding the various opinions on the nature and whateness of the ahruf!! There are at least 40 opinions/viewpoints on this matter as recorded and stated by imam suyuti (15th century) in Al-Itqan fi `Ulum al-Qur'an (Precision and Mastery in the Sciences of the Qur'an). There are certain opinions of what constitutes an ahruf which are more "mainstream/standard" than others. But in Sheikh Yasir Qahdi's view, these opinions do not have the best explanatory scope!! Many opinions exist on the spectrum off the top of my head like the ahruf are dialects of the arabs or the ahruf or The ahruf are seven types of verses in the Qur'an: apparent, command, recommendation, specific, particular, general and parable, or Differences in pronunciation etc. It seems one of the strongest out of the various opinions would be that the differences of the ahruf refer to "categories of difference" like one ahruf maybe about different ways to pronounce, or another harf is a different grammatical state, or another harf is a dialectual difference, or change in word etc. thirdly, why Dr Qahdi took down the video is not to bring confusion to people as the statements made were very nuanced and complex which could confuse those not fammiliar with the discussion or some pre-requisite knowledge!! - Also other statements like regarding the blank quran by Sheikh Qadi is also a nuanced point where if one understands the pre-requisite of the question, he would not be confused at all!! To put it simply, we cannot in one full sitting get the "exact" order of variants that the prophet (saw) read as the ahruf that exist (in the ten qirat standardized later) are all mixed!! We do not have 1 exact ahruf in a pure form!! Maybe this question is nonsensical if we take the above view of what the essence of the ahruf are. Therefore the end off, I feel that all these islamaphobes just were too desperate to just hit islam with something!! I feel that my explanation is rationally justified as I took both the clear/explicit statements and the ambigious statements into factor unlike the contrary view!!
From analyzing this discussion and from someone who has looked into the nature of the qirat/preservation of the quran, here are my thoughts: i gotta say that you guys cannot comprehend the discussion at all probably due to you lack of understanding of the science of the qirat as Sheikh Yasir mentioned!! Firsltly, it is clear that Dr Yasir Qahdi holds that the quran is preserved!! He stated this multiple times throughout the interview. Espicially the last part of the discussion where he says that he holds that the quran we have is munazal (revelaed) and is preserved!! But now there are ambigious statements which must be understood in light of the context and clear statements where he expressed his view that the quran is preserved!! * Btw this exact skill of analyzing statements through a methedology to arrive at a ruling is another science in islam called usul al fiqh !! Therefore by logical necessity, these other ambigious statements cannot imply that he holds that the quran is not preserved!! Secondly, let us understand his statements in light and context of a deeper understanding of the quranic sciences. - Regarding "the standard narrative have holes in it" Dr Yasir was clearly refering to a deeper discussion regarding the various opinions on the nature and whateness of the ahruf!! There are at least 40 opinions/viewpoints on this matter as recorded and stated by imam suyuti (15th century) in Al-Itqan fi `Ulum al-Qur'an (Precision and Mastery in the Sciences of the Qur'an). There are certain opinions of what constitutes an ahruf which are more "mainstream/standard" than others. But in Sheikh Yasir Qahdi's view, these opinions do not have the best explanatory scope!! Many opinions exist on the spectrum off the top of my head like the ahruf are dialects of the arabs or the ahruf or The ahruf are seven types of verses in the Qur'an: apparent, command, recommendation, specific, particular, general and parable, or Differences in pronunciation etc. It seems one of the strongest out of the various opinions would be that the differences of the ahruf refer to "categories of difference" like one ahruf maybe about different ways to pronounce, or another harf is a different grammatical state, or another harf is a dialectual difference, or change in word etc. thirdly, why Dr Qahdi took down the video is not to bring confusion to people as the statements made were very nuanced and complex which could confuse those not fammiliar with the discussion or some pre-requisite knowledge!! - Also other statements like regarding the blank quran by Sheikh Qadi is also a nuanced point where if one understands the pre-requisite of the question, he would not be confused at all!! To put it simply, we cannot in one full sitting get the "exact" order of variants that the prophet (saw) read as the ahruf that exist (in the ten qirat standardized later) are all mixed!! We do not have 1 exact ahruf in a pure form!! Maybe this question is nonsensical if we take the above view of what the essence of the ahruf are. Therefore the end off, I feel that all these islamaphobes just were too desperate to just hit islam with something!! I feel that my explanation is rationally justified as I took both the clear/explicit statements and the ambigious statements into factor unlike the contrary view!!
@@Jayty676yes there are 7 ahruf out of which the harf of quraysh is used in the uthman codex. And when uthman codified Qur'an he removed the dots in the Qur'an so that the rest of the recitation styles could be used to read the Qur'an
@@Jayty676 From analyzing this discussion and from someone who has looked into the nature of the qirat/preservation of the quran, here are my thoughts: i gotta say that you guys cannot comprehend the discussion at all probably due to you lack of understanding of the science of the qirat as Sheikh Yasir mentioned!! Firsltly, it is clear that Dr Yasir Qahdi holds that the quran is preserved!! He stated this multiple times throughout the interview. Espicially the last part of the discussion where he says that he holds that the quran we have is munazal (revelaed) and is preserved!! But now there are ambigious statements which must be understood in light of the context and clear statements where he expressed his view that the quran is preserved!! * Btw this exact skill of analyzing statements through a methedology to arrive at a ruling is another science in islam called usul al fiqh !! Therefore by logical necessity, these other ambigious statements cannot imply that he holds that the quran is not preserved!! Secondly, let us understand his statements in light and context of a deeper understanding of the quranic sciences. - Regarding "the standard narrative have holes in it" Dr Yasir was clearly refering to a deeper discussion regarding the various opinions on the nature and whateness of the ahruf!! There are at least 40 opinions/viewpoints on this matter as recorded and stated by imam suyuti (15th century) in Al-Itqan fi `Ulum al-Qur'an (Precision and Mastery in the Sciences of the Qur'an). There are certain opinions of what constitutes an ahruf which are more "mainstream/standard" than others. But in Sheikh Yasir Qahdi's view, these opinions do not have the best explanatory scope!! Many opinions exist on the spectrum off the top of my head like the ahruf are dialects of the arabs or the ahruf or The ahruf are seven types of verses in the Qur'an: apparent, command, recommendation, specific, particular, general and parable, or Differences in pronunciation etc. It seems one of the strongest out of the various opinions would be that the differences of the ahruf refer to "categories of difference" like one ahruf maybe about different ways to pronounce, or another harf is a different grammatical state, or another harf is a dialectual difference, or change in word etc. thirdly, why Dr Qahdi took down the video is not to bring confusion to people as the statements made were very nuanced and complex which could confuse those not fammiliar with the discussion or some pre-requisite knowledge!! - Also other statements like regarding the blank quran by Sheikh Qadi is also a nuanced point where if one understands the pre-requisite of the question, he would not be confused at all!! To put it simply, we cannot in one full sitting get the "exact" order of variants that the prophet (saw) read as the ahruf that exist (in the ten qirat standardized later) are all mixed!! We do not have 1 exact ahruf in a pure form!! Maybe this question is nonsensical if we take the above view of what the essence of the ahruf are. Therefore the end off, I feel that all these islamaphobes just were too desperate to just hit islam with something!! I feel that my explanation is rationally justified as I took both the clear/explicit statements and the ambigious statements into factor unlike the contrary view!!
What I find objectionable, is how he mentions people ‘memorise and regurgitate’ in his description of oral recitation. As if to simply toe the line and not question, and to leave it to the real ‘students of knowledge’ to understand it. The level of flagrant deception that goes on in Islam is really quite shocking. And that an established scholar of Islam would both proclaim the Quran’s unedited and eternally uncreated content while simultaneously discussing how there are enormous holes in it and not one preserved copy or recitation “but shhh we don’t talk about that” is frankly embarrassing and disingenuous. This is about truth.
You obviously know nothing about the hundreds of millions of Sunday school reciters of the Quran. Walk into any mosque, after school, and you will see kids there and adults that only "memorise and regurgitate" without understanding the Arabic or Tafseer. This is normal. Walk into any mosque if you don't believe me. I'm a grown man from England who does not speak Arabic but have memorised the parts of the Quran without understanding, as 90% of Muslims people do. Very few Muslims learn about the Tafseer and details of the Qirat (styles of reciting) and Ahruf ( the 7 dialects the Quran was revealed in. A complete Quran can have a mix of the 7 dialects). No one learns that because it's not necessary for them and very few people have an interst in the dialects of tribes in Arabia.
@@redx11xEvidently. I certainly understand now. Islam isn’t a pillar of truth at all. It’s a political system, the relevance of which is kept by indoctrinating children into it from birth and deliberately concealing its fallibility. Probably why it is so violent in the world today. Desperately trying to remain relevant in an age where the entire planet is networked and where truth and information can be instantly accessed.
From analyzing this discussion and from someone who has looked into the nature of the qirat/preservation of the quran, here are my thoughts: i gotta say that you guys cannot comprehend the discussion at all probably due to you lack of understanding of the science of the qirat as Sheikh Yasir mentioned!! Firsltly, it is clear that Dr Yasir Qahdi holds that the quran is preserved!! He stated this multiple times throughout the interview. Espicially the last part of the discussion where he says that he holds that the quran we have is munazal (revelaed) and is preserved!! But now there are ambigious statements which must be understood in light of the context and clear statements where he expressed his view that the quran is preserved!! * Btw this exact skill of analyzing statements through a methedology to arrive at a ruling is another science in islam called usul al fiqh !! Therefore by logical necessity, these other ambigious statements cannot imply that he holds that the quran is not preserved!! Secondly, let us understand his statements in light and context of a deeper understanding of the quranic sciences. - Regarding "the standard narrative have holes in it" Dr Yasir was clearly refering to a deeper discussion regarding the various opinions on the nature and whateness of the ahruf!! There are at least 40 opinions/viewpoints on this matter as recorded and stated by imam suyuti (15th century) in Al-Itqan fi `Ulum al-Qur'an (Precision and Mastery in the Sciences of the Qur'an). There are certain opinions of what constitutes an ahruf which are more "mainstream/standard" than others. But in Sheikh Yasir Qahdi's view, these opinions do not have the best explanatory scope!! Many opinions exist on the spectrum off the top of my head like the ahruf are dialects of the arabs or the ahruf or The ahruf are seven types of verses in the Qur'an: apparent, command, recommendation, specific, particular, general and parable, or Differences in pronunciation etc. It seems one of the strongest out of the various opinions would be that the differences of the ahruf refer to "categories of difference" like one ahruf maybe about different ways to pronounce, or another harf is a different grammatical state, or another harf is a dialectual difference, or change in word etc. thirdly, why Dr Qahdi took down the video is not to bring confusion to people as the statements made were very nuanced and complex which could confuse those not fammiliar with the discussion or some pre-requisite knowledge!! - Also other statements like regarding the blank quran by Sheikh Qadi is also a nuanced point where if one understands the pre-requisite of the question, he would not be confused at all!! To put it simply, we cannot in one full sitting get the "exact" order of variants that the prophet (saw) read as the ahruf that exist (in the ten qirat standardized later) are all mixed!! We do not have 1 exact ahruf in a pure form!! Maybe this question is nonsensical if we take the above view of what the essence of the ahruf are. Therefore the end off, I feel that all these islamaphobes just were too desperate to just hit islam with something!! I feel that my explanation is rationally justified as I took both the clear/explicit statements and the ambigious statements into factor unlike the contrary view!!
From analyzing this discussion and from someone who has looked into the nature of the qirat/preservation of the quran, here are my thoughts: i gotta say that you guys cannot comprehend the discussion at all probably due to you lack of understanding of the science of the qirat as Sheikh Yasir mentioned!! Firsltly, it is clear that Dr Yasir Qahdi holds that the quran is preserved!! He stated this multiple times throughout the interview. Espicially the last part of the discussion where he says that he holds that the quran we have is munazal (revelaed) and is preserved!! But now there are ambigious statements which must be understood in light of the context and clear statements where he expressed his view that the quran is preserved!! * Btw this exact skill of analyzing statements through a methedology to arrive at a ruling is another science in islam called usul al fiqh !! Therefore by logical necessity, these other ambigious statements cannot imply that he holds that the quran is not preserved!! Secondly, let us understand his statements in light and context of a deeper understanding of the quranic sciences. - Regarding "the standard narrative have holes in it" Dr Yasir was clearly refering to a deeper discussion regarding the various opinions on the nature and whateness of the ahruf!! There are at least 40 opinions/viewpoints on this matter as recorded and stated by imam suyuti (15th century) in Al-Itqan fi `Ulum al-Qur'an (Precision and Mastery in the Sciences of the Qur'an). There are certain opinions of what constitutes an ahruf which are more "mainstream/standard" than others. But in Sheikh Yasir Qahdi's view, these opinions do not have the best explanatory scope!! Many opinions exist on the spectrum off the top of my head like the ahruf are dialects of the arabs or the ahruf or The ahruf are seven types of verses in the Qur'an: apparent, command, recommendation, specific, particular, general and parable, or Differences in pronunciation etc. It seems one of the strongest out of the various opinions would be that the differences of the ahruf refer to "categories of difference" like one ahruf maybe about different ways to pronounce, or another harf is a different grammatical state, or another harf is a dialectual difference, or change in word etc. thirdly, why Dr Qahdi took down the video is not to bring confusion to people as the statements made were very nuanced and complex which could confuse those not fammiliar with the discussion or some pre-requisite knowledge!! - Also other statements like regarding the blank quran by Sheikh Qadi is also a nuanced point where if one understands the pre-requisite of the question, he would not be confused at all!! To put it simply, we cannot in one full sitting get the "exact" order of variants that the prophet (saw) read as the ahruf that exist (in the ten qirat standardized later) are all mixed!! We do not have 1 exact ahruf in a pure form!! Maybe this question is nonsensical if we take the above view of what the essence of the ahruf are. Therefore the end off, I feel that all these islamaphobes just were too desperate to just hit islam with something!! I feel that my explanation is rationally justified as I took both the clear/explicit statements and the ambigious statements into factor unlike the contrary view!!
Jazakallah kher to Doc Qadhi and M Hijab uhibukum fii laah. 1st time to listen to the whole interview and I have one word, Respect 👊🏽! May Allah preserve you and give you more wisdom. The Orientalists have, and will always, come up with so-called academic questions and even if they are given a proper explanation or answer they have always got another question. The Devils advocate only sought to prove doubt and it is enough for him to win followers by confusion. They, the devils, have existed from time beginning, even in the Garden, the original “advocate of confusion” did his work, least we forget! So, read read and read in the name of your Rabb in order to get closer to His shade on the day there will be no shade but His shade. May Allah guide us towards His light and lighten the guidance towards Him 🤲🏾😊
Holey holes in the narrative. Even Muhammad has holes. Merciful prophet who murdered 700-900 Jews in a single day. What a merciful prophet. It takes a genius to be a Muslim.
@dark_mode From analyzing this discussion and from someone who has looked into the nature of the qirat/preservation of the quran, here are my thoughts: i gotta say that you guys cannot comprehend the discussion at all probably due to you lack of understanding of the science of the qirat as Sheikh Yasir mentioned!! Firsltly, it is clear that Dr Yasir Qahdi holds that the quran is preserved!! He stated this multiple times throughout the interview. Espicially the last part of the discussion where he says that he holds that the quran we have is munazal (revelaed) and is preserved!! But now there are ambigious statements which must be understood in light of the context and clear statements where he expressed his view that the quran is preserved!! * Btw this exact skill of analyzing statements through a methedology to arrive at a ruling is another science in islam called usul al fiqh !! Therefore by logical necessity, these other ambigious statements cannot imply that he holds that the quran is not preserved!! Secondly, let us understand his statements in light and context of a deeper understanding of the quranic sciences. - Regarding "the standard narrative have holes in it" Dr Yasir was clearly refering to a deeper discussion regarding the various opinions on the nature and whateness of the ahruf!! There are at least 40 opinions/viewpoints on this matter as recorded and stated by imam suyuti (15th century) in Al-Itqan fi `Ulum al-Qur'an (Precision and Mastery in the Sciences of the Qur'an). There are certain opinions of what constitutes an ahruf which are more "mainstream/standard" than others. But in Sheikh Yasir Qahdi's view, these opinions do not have the best explanatory scope!! Many opinions exist on the spectrum off the top of my head like the ahruf are dialects of the arabs or the ahruf or The ahruf are seven types of verses in the Qur'an: apparent, command, recommendation, specific, particular, general and parable, or Differences in pronunciation etc. It seems one of the strongest out of the various opinions would be that the differences of the ahruf refer to "categories of difference" like one ahruf maybe about different ways to pronounce, or another harf is a different grammatical state, or another harf is a dialectual difference, or change in word etc. thirdly, why Dr Qahdi took down the video is not to bring confusion to people as the statements made were very nuanced and complex which could confuse those not fammiliar with the discussion or some pre-requisite knowledge!! - Also other statements like regarding the blank quran by Sheikh Qadi is also a nuanced point where if one understands the pre-requisite of the question, he would not be confused at all!! To put it simply, we cannot in one full sitting get the "exact" order of variants that the prophet (saw) read as the ahruf that exist (in the ten qirat standardized later) are all mixed!! We do not have 1 exact ahruf in a pure form!! Maybe this question is nonsensical if we take the above view of what the essence of the ahruf are. Therefore the end off, I feel that all these islamaphobes just were too desperate to just hit islam with something!! I feel that my explanation is rationally justified as I took both the clear/explicit statements and the ambigious statements into factor unlike the contrary view!!
As an ex-muslim 😮Yasir truly admitted the koran has holes in 2o2o and I believe him' now I know why I found it strange not to question the koran all my life🤔 So after extensive research ' historically there are 3o korans📙 and in 192o in Cairo a high school koran test couldn't be graded because students were using different korans so in order to situate the issue a German scholar took pages out of each koran and created one koran which is falsely claimed to be the "eternal book that came from allah"
Thanks to Hijab & Yasir Qadhi for pointing out the holes in Standard Islamic Narratives that have been told for years. The Quran is preserved, yet there are 26 versions of the Quran with 96,000 contradictions. My question: Which one is the REAL Quran?
there are not 26 versions of the quran, there never has been and there will never be the quran has 6300 odd words, how can it have 96000 contradictions?
You do realize when you make claims where no other scholar or respected academic researcher has made these same claims it makes you seem less credible ?
@@hz1056you realise there's a red line yasir qadhi said muslims scholars must not cross? And yasir Gandhi said their are western scholars who are crossing the red line muslims are told not to cross and are asking questions and are writing about it today(4 years ago)?
So basically he got mad cause a fellow muslim had a valid question that they know they cant answer convincingly, if at all. Thats just hilarious. Imagine that, a scholar being scared of answering a question. His degrees shouldve been revoked 🤣🤣
You hear this! It's the Ulama-nati of Islam exposed. Telling us how deceitful Islam is. While we know that Jesus Christ the son of God is the way, the truth and the light and IS the straight path. What does Islam say about the straight path fellow Muslims? We pray you follow the straight path who is our Lord Jesus Christ whom I'm not worthy of either YET He prepares a way for those he calls.
Wow, Yasir was saying to Muhammad Hijab not to push him in Oder preventing him not to lie, because he has been lying to Western audiences for very long time saying Quran was preserved NO WORD NO LETTER NO DOT. my question is simple where is the Quran verses talking about breastfeeding 10 times as well as stoning idolatry?
From analyzing this discussion and from someone who has looked into the nature of the qirat/preservation of the quran, here are my thoughts: i gotta say that you guys cannot comprehend the discussion at all probably due to you lack of understanding of the science of the qirat as Sheikh Yasir mentioned!! Firsltly, it is clear that Dr Yasir Qahdi holds that the quran is preserved!! He stated this multiple times throughout the interview. Espicially the last part of the discussion where he says that he holds that the quran we have is munazal (revelaed) and is preserved!! But now there are ambigious statements which must be understood in light of the context and clear statements where he expressed his view that the quran is preserved!! * Btw this exact skill of analyzing statements through a methedology to arrive at a ruling is another science in islam called usul al fiqh !! Therefore by logical necessity, these other ambigious statements cannot imply that he holds that the quran is not preserved!! Secondly, let us understand his statements in light and context of a deeper understanding of the quranic sciences. - Regarding "the standard narrative have holes in it" Dr Yasir was clearly refering to a deeper discussion regarding the various opinions on the nature and whateness of the ahruf!! There are at least 40 opinions/viewpoints on this matter as recorded and stated by imam suyuti (15th century) in Al-Itqan fi `Ulum al-Qur'an (Precision and Mastery in the Sciences of the Qur'an). There are certain opinions of what constitutes an ahruf which are more "mainstream/standard" than others. But in Sheikh Yasir Qahdi's view, these opinions do not have the best explanatory scope!! Many opinions exist on the spectrum off the top of my head like the ahruf are dialects of the arabs or the ahruf or The ahruf are seven types of verses in the Qur'an: apparent, command, recommendation, specific, particular, general and parable, or Differences in pronunciation etc. It seems one of the strongest out of the various opinions would be that the differences of the ahruf refer to "categories of difference" like one ahruf maybe about different ways to pronounce, or another harf is a different grammatical state, or another harf is a dialectual difference, or change in word etc. thirdly, why Dr Qahdi took down the video is not to bring confusion to people as the statements made were very nuanced and complex which could confuse those not fammiliar with the discussion or some pre-requisite knowledge!! - Also other statements like regarding the blank quran by Sheikh Qadi is also a nuanced point where if one understands the pre-requisite of the question, he would not be confused at all!! To put it simply, we cannot in one full sitting get the "exact" order of variants that the prophet (saw) read as the ahruf that exist (in the ten qirat standardized later) are all mixed!! We do not have 1 exact ahruf in a pure form!! Maybe this question is nonsensical if we take the above view of what the essence of the ahruf are. Therefore the end off, I feel that all these islamaphobes just were too desperate to just hit islam with something!! I feel that my explanation is rationally justified as I took both the clear/explicit statements and the ambigious statements into factor unlike the contrary view!!
The topic requires background knowledge to understand. It was removed because people with no knowledge use it in a way thay does not actually apply. For example liberals use this tactic to declare something is racist when race is not in any way involved. In this case the argument is applied to a topic that is completely unrelated.
@ He just challenged the orthodox position that the Quran is divinely protected. Non-Muslims are just posting what he said. No editing whatsoever. He could have just clarified his position, but he decided to take it down. Just shows how a big deal this is. Plus, why did other LEARNED Muslims, like Farid, Abu Mussab Wajdi Akkari, Sheikh Karim Abuzayd, and many more attack YQ over this issue, if it was not a big deal?
@@richarddeleon2860 He did clarify it in another video. Some Muslims, just like in all other groups, love to make drama where none exists because people with low knowledge do not understand what they are talking about to begin with so they follow along with whatever makes them feel good.
If the Quran wasnt preserved then how would it be a miracle today, how would there be mathematical miracles, linguistic miracles, Historical Miracles, Scientific… how would there a balance of words, how would there be a checksum , .. Alhamdullilah for Islam!
There is no mathematical miracle, it's just feeding Quran into computer and finding words or numbers using formulas and then presenting them as miracles. You can find atleast 10 mathematical miracles in in every story book. There is no scientific miracle as well bcoz it's all about twisting words to match with science after scientist invent it. Just like Quran, Bible has miracles, Hindu scriptures has miracles. Nothing unique in Quran. Just do research about miracles in other scriptures and then u will understand what I'm talking about. Untill then u will keep believing that only Quran has miracles.
Ali Dawah even mentioned all these miracles were debunked/false😂 a few weeks ago When Muslims are claiming on the one hand the miracles are real and on the other hand other Muslims are saying no it is not real you have to question what you are believing and how did he come to the conclusion that the miracles in the quran are debunked?
@@kay07949 Instead of researching my claims you just accuse me of lying. This is Muslims logic and is also the reason why I will not be continuing this conversation because no matter what facts I would bring you would make baseless accusations against me without looking into what I am saying, but here is the link to the video from his channel. God bless you ua-cam.com/video/kUZeMcdlQYk/v-deo.html
You’re reading into it. You should publicize your sins as it normalizes them. If I smoke cigarettes or weed I shouldn’t tell my friends or family even if I did it in the past. Don’t try to play games
@@Vektordeformacio What does those things have to do with not publicizing your sins to the world? I think I know more about those considering Allah SwT does not need a human god sacrifice to forgive his creation. Thanks try again buddy.
@@hz1056 You can expiate for your sins through repentance, by acting against your sins, renouncing them and being a better person while you understand your misdeeds. As others accept this, you will be socially redeemed. But if you "protect your sins" by concealing them, letting them rot in you, you just become a worse person. Even worse if you lie about them. You muslims do not understand the words you use.
@@Vektordeformacio This is hilarious to me, the act of not showing others our sins is not to say pretend you don’t sin. The idea is not normalize a sin. Whatever someone is struggling with they should not nonchalantly talk about these things as it normalizes them. Lastly, we actually have Hadiths and verses that tackle this problem of people not sinning in public and then going into private settings to sin without shame that their lord can see them. I could waste my time by giving a full lecture with EVERYTHING we say about sinning but you are here to try to nitpick everything Islam related instead of actually learn so you can find real faults. You Christian’s don’t understand that you guys know 0 have this narrow view that does not encompass our beliefs and then try to put your own insecurities onto us. Sorry buddy, it’s not gonna work.
The controversy starts at 1:17:00
He's cleared his name. Watch his video he made regarding this
@@mustafizkhan6030 Then, why did both of them take down this video?
@@mustafizkhan6030 hahaha maybe because he was getting called a kufr by a load of madmen
@@mustafizkhan6030 u mean hole in the head instead of narrative?
You can have both though if you start questioning the Quran@@trinitymatrix9719
Goodness, this is going to take a few goes to get through. Niqab's self aggrandising, pretentious manner is like fingernails on a chalkboard.
Thank you for reposting, though, it's necessary research.
"No question about it now here are the questions". - Yasir Qadhi
Thank you mr Hijab for forcing your Sheikh to expose the holes in the narrative lol
From analyzing this discussion and from someone who has looked into the nature of the qirat/preservation of the quran, here are my thoughts:
i gotta say that you guys cannot comprehend the discussion at all probably due to you lack of understanding of the science of the qirat as Sheikh Yasir mentioned!!
Firsltly, it is clear that Dr Yasir Qahdi holds that the quran is preserved!! He stated this multiple times throughout the interview. Espicially the last part of the discussion where he says that he holds that the quran we have is munazal (revelaed) and is preserved!!
But now there are ambigious statements which must be understood in light of the context and clear statements where he expressed his view that the quran is preserved!! * Btw this exact skill of analyzing statements through a methedology to arrive at a ruling is another science in islam called usul al fiqh !!
Therefore by logical necessity, these other ambigious statements cannot imply that he holds that the quran is not preserved!!
Secondly, let us understand his statements in light and context of a deeper understanding of the quranic sciences.
- Regarding "the standard narrative have holes in it" Dr Yasir was clearly refering to a deeper discussion regarding the various opinions on the nature and whateness of the ahruf!! There are at least 40 opinions/viewpoints on this matter as recorded and stated by imam suyuti (15th century) in Al-Itqan fi `Ulum al-Qur'an (Precision and Mastery in the Sciences of the Qur'an).
There are certain opinions of what constitutes an ahruf which are more "mainstream/standard" than others. But in Sheikh Yasir Qahdi's view, these opinions do not have the best explanatory scope!! Many opinions exist on the spectrum off the top of my head like the ahruf are dialects of the arabs or the ahruf or The ahruf are seven types of verses in the Qur'an: apparent, command, recommendation, specific, particular, general and parable, or Differences in pronunciation etc.
It seems one of the strongest out of the various opinions would be that the differences of the ahruf refer to "categories of difference" like one ahruf maybe about different ways to pronounce, or another harf is a different grammatical state, or another harf is a dialectual difference, or change in word etc.
thirdly, why Dr Qahdi took down the video is not to bring confusion to people as the statements made were very nuanced and complex which could confuse those not fammiliar with the discussion or some pre-requisite knowledge!!
- Also other statements like regarding the blank quran by Sheikh Qadi is also a nuanced point where if one understands the pre-requisite of the question, he would not be confused at all!! To put it simply, we cannot in one full sitting get the "exact" order of variants that the prophet (saw) read as the ahruf that exist (in the ten qirat standardized later) are all mixed!! We do not have 1 exact ahruf in a pure form!! Maybe this question is nonsensical if we take the above view of what the essence of the ahruf are.
Therefore the end off, I feel that all these islamaphobes just were too desperate to just hit islam with something!!
I feel that my explanation is rationally justified as I took both the clear/explicit statements and the ambigious statements into factor unlike the contrary view!!
Just in case this video gets a copyright strike by Yasir Qadhi, please download this video.
Downloading it now
You 3 is 1 theology, you can't demage Quranic preservation, you just strengthen its authenticy.
@B.Y.A We didn't even have to do anything lol Yasir Qadhi said it.
@@KevinSmile No, the claim of Yasir Qadhi just strenghtened the authencity of the Quran.
In other hand, your NT is in every point, every sphere an anonimous, corrupt and contradiction book.
@@B.Y.A It did the exact opposite and that's why they scrubbed the internet of interview and Yasir Qadhi has been all but cancelled.
From analyzing this discussion and from someone who has looked into the nature of the qirat/preservation of the quran, here are my thoughts:
i gotta say that you guys cannot comprehend the discussion at all probably due to you lack of understanding of the science of the qirat as Sheikh Yasir mentioned!!
Firsltly, it is clear that Dr Yasir Qahdi holds that the quran is preserved!! He stated this multiple times throughout the interview. Espicially the last part of the discussion where he says that he holds that the quran we have is munazal (revelaed) and is preserved!!
But now there are ambigious statements which must be understood in light of the context and clear statements where he expressed his view that the quran is preserved!! * Btw this exact skill of analyzing statements through a methedology to arrive at a ruling is another science in islam called usul al fiqh !!
Therefore by logical necessity, these other ambigious statements cannot imply that he holds that the quran is not preserved!!
Secondly, let us understand his statements in light and context of a deeper understanding of the quranic sciences.
- Regarding "the standard narrative have holes in it" Dr Yasir was clearly refering to a deeper discussion regarding the various opinions on the nature and whateness of the ahruf!! There are at least 40 opinions/viewpoints on this matter as recorded and stated by imam suyuti (15th century) in Al-Itqan fi `Ulum al-Qur'an (Precision and Mastery in the Sciences of the Qur'an).
There are certain opinions of what constitutes an ahruf which are more "mainstream/standard" than others. But in Sheikh Yasir Qahdi's view, these opinions do not have the best explanatory scope!! Many opinions exist on the spectrum off the top of my head like the ahruf are dialects of the arabs or the ahruf or The ahruf are seven types of verses in the Qur'an: apparent, command, recommendation, specific, particular, general and parable, or Differences in pronunciation etc.
It seems one of the strongest out of the various opinions would be that the differences of the ahruf refer to "categories of difference" like one ahruf maybe about different ways to pronounce, or another harf is a different grammatical state, or another harf is a dialectual difference, or change in word etc.
thirdly, why Dr Qahdi took down the video is not to bring confusion to people as the statements made were very nuanced and complex which could confuse those not fammiliar with the discussion or some pre-requisite knowledge!!
- Also other statements like regarding the blank quran by Sheikh Qadi is also a nuanced point where if one understands the pre-requisite of the question, he would not be confused at all!! To put it simply, we cannot in one full sitting get the "exact" order of variants that the prophet (saw) read as the ahruf that exist (in the ten qirat standardized later) are all mixed!! We do not have 1 exact ahruf in a pure form!! Maybe this question is nonsensical if we take the above view of what the essence of the ahruf are.
Therefore the end off, I feel that all these islamaphobes just were too desperate to just hit islam with something!!
I feel that my explanation is rationally justified as I took both the clear/explicit statements and the ambigious statements into factor unlike the contrary view!!
Yasir qadi i respect your honesty.
From analyzing this discussion and from someone who has looked into the nature of the qirat/preservation of the quran, here are my thoughts:
i gotta say that you guys cannot comprehend the discussion at all probably due to you lack of understanding of the science of the qirat as Sheikh Yasir mentioned!!
Firsltly, it is clear that Dr Yasir Qahdi holds that the quran is preserved!! He stated this multiple times throughout the interview. Espicially the last part of the discussion where he says that he holds that the quran we have is munazal (revelaed) and is preserved!!
But now there are ambigious statements which must be understood in light of the context and clear statements where he expressed his view that the quran is preserved!! * Btw this exact skill of analyzing statements through a methedology to arrive at a ruling is another science in islam called usul al fiqh !!
Therefore by logical necessity, these other ambigious statements cannot imply that he holds that the quran is not preserved!!
Secondly, let us understand his statements in light and context of a deeper understanding of the quranic sciences.
- Regarding "the standard narrative have holes in it" Dr Yasir was clearly refering to a deeper discussion regarding the various opinions on the nature and whateness of the ahruf!! There are at least 40 opinions/viewpoints on this matter as recorded and stated by imam suyuti (15th century) in Al-Itqan fi `Ulum al-Qur'an (Precision and Mastery in the Sciences of the Qur'an).
There are certain opinions of what constitutes an ahruf which are more "mainstream/standard" than others. But in Sheikh Yasir Qahdi's view, these opinions do not have the best explanatory scope!! Many opinions exist on the spectrum off the top of my head like the ahruf are dialects of the arabs or the ahruf or The ahruf are seven types of verses in the Qur'an: apparent, command, recommendation, specific, particular, general and parable, or Differences in pronunciation etc.
It seems one of the strongest out of the various opinions would be that the differences of the ahruf refer to "categories of difference" like one ahruf maybe about different ways to pronounce, or another harf is a different grammatical state, or another harf is a dialectual difference, or change in word etc.
thirdly, why Dr Qahdi took down the video is not to bring confusion to people as the statements made were very nuanced and complex which could confuse those not fammiliar with the discussion or some pre-requisite knowledge!!
- Also other statements like regarding the blank quran by Sheikh Qadi is also a nuanced point where if one understands the pre-requisite of the question, he would not be confused at all!! To put it simply, we cannot in one full sitting get the "exact" order of variants that the prophet (saw) read as the ahruf that exist (in the ten qirat standardized later) are all mixed!! We do not have 1 exact ahruf in a pure form!! Maybe this question is nonsensical if we take the above view of what the essence of the ahruf are.
Therefore the end off, I feel that all these islamaphobes just were too desperate to just hit islam with something!!
I feel that my explanation is rationally justified as I took both the clear/explicit statements and the ambigious statements into factor unlike the contrary view!!
Have u even watch the whole video? There is no contradiction
Amazing what qualifies as a scholar in Islam.
Was the interview perfectly preserved?
😅😅😂😂
The recitation is preserved
@@mcchris5524there are 7 recitation(aruf) and which one is preserved and where are the other 9 recitation?🤦♂️
@@Jayty676yes there are 7 ahruf out of which the harf of quraysh is used in the uthman codex. And when uthman codified Qur'an he removed the dots in the Qur'an so that the rest of the recitation styles could be used to read the Qur'an
@@Jayty676 From analyzing this discussion and from someone who has looked into the nature of the qirat/preservation of the quran, here are my thoughts:
i gotta say that you guys cannot comprehend the discussion at all probably due to you lack of understanding of the science of the qirat as Sheikh Yasir mentioned!!
Firsltly, it is clear that Dr Yasir Qahdi holds that the quran is preserved!! He stated this multiple times throughout the interview. Espicially the last part of the discussion where he says that he holds that the quran we have is munazal (revelaed) and is preserved!!
But now there are ambigious statements which must be understood in light of the context and clear statements where he expressed his view that the quran is preserved!! * Btw this exact skill of analyzing statements through a methedology to arrive at a ruling is another science in islam called usul al fiqh !!
Therefore by logical necessity, these other ambigious statements cannot imply that he holds that the quran is not preserved!!
Secondly, let us understand his statements in light and context of a deeper understanding of the quranic sciences.
- Regarding "the standard narrative have holes in it" Dr Yasir was clearly refering to a deeper discussion regarding the various opinions on the nature and whateness of the ahruf!! There are at least 40 opinions/viewpoints on this matter as recorded and stated by imam suyuti (15th century) in Al-Itqan fi `Ulum al-Qur'an (Precision and Mastery in the Sciences of the Qur'an).
There are certain opinions of what constitutes an ahruf which are more "mainstream/standard" than others. But in Sheikh Yasir Qahdi's view, these opinions do not have the best explanatory scope!! Many opinions exist on the spectrum off the top of my head like the ahruf are dialects of the arabs or the ahruf or The ahruf are seven types of verses in the Qur'an: apparent, command, recommendation, specific, particular, general and parable, or Differences in pronunciation etc.
It seems one of the strongest out of the various opinions would be that the differences of the ahruf refer to "categories of difference" like one ahruf maybe about different ways to pronounce, or another harf is a different grammatical state, or another harf is a dialectual difference, or change in word etc.
thirdly, why Dr Qahdi took down the video is not to bring confusion to people as the statements made were very nuanced and complex which could confuse those not fammiliar with the discussion or some pre-requisite knowledge!!
- Also other statements like regarding the blank quran by Sheikh Qadi is also a nuanced point where if one understands the pre-requisite of the question, he would not be confused at all!! To put it simply, we cannot in one full sitting get the "exact" order of variants that the prophet (saw) read as the ahruf that exist (in the ten qirat standardized later) are all mixed!! We do not have 1 exact ahruf in a pure form!! Maybe this question is nonsensical if we take the above view of what the essence of the ahruf are.
Therefore the end off, I feel that all these islamaphobes just were too desperate to just hit islam with something!!
I feel that my explanation is rationally justified as I took both the clear/explicit statements and the ambigious statements into factor unlike the contrary view!!
What I find objectionable, is how he mentions people ‘memorise and regurgitate’ in his description of oral recitation. As if to simply toe the line and not question, and to leave it to the real ‘students of knowledge’ to understand it.
The level of flagrant deception that goes on in Islam is really quite shocking.
And that an established scholar of Islam would both proclaim the Quran’s unedited and eternally uncreated content while simultaneously discussing how there are enormous holes in it and not one preserved copy or recitation “but shhh we don’t talk about that” is frankly embarrassing and disingenuous.
This is about truth.
You obviously know nothing about the hundreds of millions of Sunday school reciters of the Quran.
Walk into any mosque, after school, and you will see kids there and adults that only "memorise and regurgitate" without understanding the Arabic or Tafseer.
This is normal.
Walk into any mosque if you don't believe me.
I'm a grown man from England who does not speak Arabic but have memorised the parts of the Quran without understanding, as 90% of Muslims people do.
Very few Muslims learn about the Tafseer and details of the Qirat (styles of reciting) and Ahruf ( the 7 dialects the Quran was revealed in. A complete Quran can have a mix of the 7 dialects).
No one learns that because it's not necessary for them and very few people have an interst in the dialects of tribes in Arabia.
@@redx11xEvidently. I certainly understand now. Islam isn’t a pillar of truth at all. It’s a political system, the relevance of which is kept by indoctrinating children into it from birth and deliberately concealing its fallibility.
Probably why it is so violent in the world today. Desperately trying to remain relevant in an age where the entire planet is networked and where truth and information can be instantly accessed.
I memorized in Islamic way 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
🤣🤣🤣
Get a life
From analyzing this discussion and from someone who has looked into the nature of the qirat/preservation of the quran, here are my thoughts:
i gotta say that you guys cannot comprehend the discussion at all probably due to you lack of understanding of the science of the qirat as Sheikh Yasir mentioned!!
Firsltly, it is clear that Dr Yasir Qahdi holds that the quran is preserved!! He stated this multiple times throughout the interview. Espicially the last part of the discussion where he says that he holds that the quran we have is munazal (revelaed) and is preserved!!
But now there are ambigious statements which must be understood in light of the context and clear statements where he expressed his view that the quran is preserved!! * Btw this exact skill of analyzing statements through a methedology to arrive at a ruling is another science in islam called usul al fiqh !!
Therefore by logical necessity, these other ambigious statements cannot imply that he holds that the quran is not preserved!!
Secondly, let us understand his statements in light and context of a deeper understanding of the quranic sciences.
- Regarding "the standard narrative have holes in it" Dr Yasir was clearly refering to a deeper discussion regarding the various opinions on the nature and whateness of the ahruf!! There are at least 40 opinions/viewpoints on this matter as recorded and stated by imam suyuti (15th century) in Al-Itqan fi `Ulum al-Qur'an (Precision and Mastery in the Sciences of the Qur'an).
There are certain opinions of what constitutes an ahruf which are more "mainstream/standard" than others. But in Sheikh Yasir Qahdi's view, these opinions do not have the best explanatory scope!! Many opinions exist on the spectrum off the top of my head like the ahruf are dialects of the arabs or the ahruf or The ahruf are seven types of verses in the Qur'an: apparent, command, recommendation, specific, particular, general and parable, or Differences in pronunciation etc.
It seems one of the strongest out of the various opinions would be that the differences of the ahruf refer to "categories of difference" like one ahruf maybe about different ways to pronounce, or another harf is a different grammatical state, or another harf is a dialectual difference, or change in word etc.
thirdly, why Dr Qahdi took down the video is not to bring confusion to people as the statements made were very nuanced and complex which could confuse those not fammiliar with the discussion or some pre-requisite knowledge!!
- Also other statements like regarding the blank quran by Sheikh Qadi is also a nuanced point where if one understands the pre-requisite of the question, he would not be confused at all!! To put it simply, we cannot in one full sitting get the "exact" order of variants that the prophet (saw) read as the ahruf that exist (in the ten qirat standardized later) are all mixed!! We do not have 1 exact ahruf in a pure form!! Maybe this question is nonsensical if we take the above view of what the essence of the ahruf are.
Therefore the end off, I feel that all these islamaphobes just were too desperate to just hit islam with something!!
I feel that my explanation is rationally justified as I took both the clear/explicit statements and the ambigious statements into factor unlike the contrary view!!
Good job. Thank you.
Grabbed as a WAV file if anyone wants it.
The best of constant Islamic inconstancy.
Gosh i missed that holes-in-the-narrative voice of Yasir Qadhi 😂😂🤣🤣
He's lying and is covering his track like a crooked cop. Now he's opening explaining it was a misunderstanding. I smelled spoil garbage
From analyzing this discussion and from someone who has looked into the nature of the qirat/preservation of the quran, here are my thoughts:
i gotta say that you guys cannot comprehend the discussion at all probably due to you lack of understanding of the science of the qirat as Sheikh Yasir mentioned!!
Firsltly, it is clear that Dr Yasir Qahdi holds that the quran is preserved!! He stated this multiple times throughout the interview. Espicially the last part of the discussion where he says that he holds that the quran we have is munazal (revelaed) and is preserved!!
But now there are ambigious statements which must be understood in light of the context and clear statements where he expressed his view that the quran is preserved!! * Btw this exact skill of analyzing statements through a methedology to arrive at a ruling is another science in islam called usul al fiqh !!
Therefore by logical necessity, these other ambigious statements cannot imply that he holds that the quran is not preserved!!
Secondly, let us understand his statements in light and context of a deeper understanding of the quranic sciences.
- Regarding "the standard narrative have holes in it" Dr Yasir was clearly refering to a deeper discussion regarding the various opinions on the nature and whateness of the ahruf!! There are at least 40 opinions/viewpoints on this matter as recorded and stated by imam suyuti (15th century) in Al-Itqan fi `Ulum al-Qur'an (Precision and Mastery in the Sciences of the Qur'an).
There are certain opinions of what constitutes an ahruf which are more "mainstream/standard" than others. But in Sheikh Yasir Qahdi's view, these opinions do not have the best explanatory scope!! Many opinions exist on the spectrum off the top of my head like the ahruf are dialects of the arabs or the ahruf or The ahruf are seven types of verses in the Qur'an: apparent, command, recommendation, specific, particular, general and parable, or Differences in pronunciation etc.
It seems one of the strongest out of the various opinions would be that the differences of the ahruf refer to "categories of difference" like one ahruf maybe about different ways to pronounce, or another harf is a different grammatical state, or another harf is a dialectual difference, or change in word etc.
thirdly, why Dr Qahdi took down the video is not to bring confusion to people as the statements made were very nuanced and complex which could confuse those not fammiliar with the discussion or some pre-requisite knowledge!!
- Also other statements like regarding the blank quran by Sheikh Qadi is also a nuanced point where if one understands the pre-requisite of the question, he would not be confused at all!! To put it simply, we cannot in one full sitting get the "exact" order of variants that the prophet (saw) read as the ahruf that exist (in the ten qirat standardized later) are all mixed!! We do not have 1 exact ahruf in a pure form!! Maybe this question is nonsensical if we take the above view of what the essence of the ahruf are.
Therefore the end off, I feel that all these islamaphobes just were too desperate to just hit islam with something!!
I feel that my explanation is rationally justified as I took both the clear/explicit statements and the ambigious statements into factor unlike the contrary view!!
Jazakallah kher to Doc Qadhi and M Hijab uhibukum fii laah.
1st time to listen to the whole interview and I have one word, Respect 👊🏽!
May Allah preserve you and give you more wisdom.
The Orientalists have, and will always, come up with so-called academic questions and even if they are given a proper explanation or answer they have always got another question. The Devils advocate only sought to prove doubt and it is enough for him to win followers by confusion. They, the devils, have existed from time beginning, even in the Garden, the original “advocate of confusion” did his work, least we forget!
So, read read and read in the name of your Rabb in order to get closer to His shade on the day there will be no shade but His shade.
May Allah guide us towards His light and lighten the guidance towards Him 🤲🏾😊
So, why did he take down this video?
Holey holes in the narrative. Even Muhammad has holes. Merciful prophet who murdered 700-900 Jews in a single day. What a merciful prophet. It takes a genius to be a Muslim.
Brother I have doubts..
In what?
What doubts man!? 😂
@@karlosjeffers4791 get the hell outta here!!!! 😂
@@j.era424 Be a Man! 😅
@dark_mode From analyzing this discussion and from someone who has looked into the nature of the qirat/preservation of the quran, here are my thoughts:
i gotta say that you guys cannot comprehend the discussion at all probably due to you lack of understanding of the science of the qirat as Sheikh Yasir mentioned!!
Firsltly, it is clear that Dr Yasir Qahdi holds that the quran is preserved!! He stated this multiple times throughout the interview. Espicially the last part of the discussion where he says that he holds that the quran we have is munazal (revelaed) and is preserved!!
But now there are ambigious statements which must be understood in light of the context and clear statements where he expressed his view that the quran is preserved!! * Btw this exact skill of analyzing statements through a methedology to arrive at a ruling is another science in islam called usul al fiqh !!
Therefore by logical necessity, these other ambigious statements cannot imply that he holds that the quran is not preserved!!
Secondly, let us understand his statements in light and context of a deeper understanding of the quranic sciences.
- Regarding "the standard narrative have holes in it" Dr Yasir was clearly refering to a deeper discussion regarding the various opinions on the nature and whateness of the ahruf!! There are at least 40 opinions/viewpoints on this matter as recorded and stated by imam suyuti (15th century) in Al-Itqan fi `Ulum al-Qur'an (Precision and Mastery in the Sciences of the Qur'an).
There are certain opinions of what constitutes an ahruf which are more "mainstream/standard" than others. But in Sheikh Yasir Qahdi's view, these opinions do not have the best explanatory scope!! Many opinions exist on the spectrum off the top of my head like the ahruf are dialects of the arabs or the ahruf or The ahruf are seven types of verses in the Qur'an: apparent, command, recommendation, specific, particular, general and parable, or Differences in pronunciation etc.
It seems one of the strongest out of the various opinions would be that the differences of the ahruf refer to "categories of difference" like one ahruf maybe about different ways to pronounce, or another harf is a different grammatical state, or another harf is a dialectual difference, or change in word etc.
thirdly, why Dr Qahdi took down the video is not to bring confusion to people as the statements made were very nuanced and complex which could confuse those not fammiliar with the discussion or some pre-requisite knowledge!!
- Also other statements like regarding the blank quran by Sheikh Qadi is also a nuanced point where if one understands the pre-requisite of the question, he would not be confused at all!! To put it simply, we cannot in one full sitting get the "exact" order of variants that the prophet (saw) read as the ahruf that exist (in the ten qirat standardized later) are all mixed!! We do not have 1 exact ahruf in a pure form!! Maybe this question is nonsensical if we take the above view of what the essence of the ahruf are.
Therefore the end off, I feel that all these islamaphobes just were too desperate to just hit islam with something!!
I feel that my explanation is rationally justified as I took both the clear/explicit statements and the ambigious statements into factor unlike the contrary view!!
Yes The Standard Narrative Has Holes
As an ex-muslim 😮Yasir truly admitted the koran has holes in 2o2o and I believe him' now I know why I found it strange not to question the koran all my life🤔 So after extensive research ' historically there are 3o korans📙 and in 192o in Cairo a high school koran test couldn't be graded because students were using different korans so in order to situate the issue a German scholar took pages out of each koran and created one koran which is falsely claimed to be the "eternal book that came from allah"
It was edited by Azhar in 20s they chose Hafs because it was what the Ottomans popularized.
Can you recall which German scholar you're referring to?
Even western academics dont agree with the things your making up
@@hz1056 they do
@@C120. Great, send a list of these scholars.
"Koran" Ahhh an ex muslim i see....
This guy Yasir, is dodgy as heck
But what he said is true or not?
There is no controversy, House of Batil
😂😅🤤
Thanks to Hijab & Yasir Qadhi for pointing out the holes in Standard Islamic Narratives that have been told for years. The Quran is preserved, yet there are 26 versions of the Quran with 96,000 contradictions. My question: Which one is the REAL Quran?
there are not 26 versions of the quran, there never has been and there will never be
the quran has 6300 odd words, how can it have 96000 contradictions?
You do realize when you make claims where no other scholar or respected academic researcher has made these same claims it makes you seem less credible ?
Just see by yourself : en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warsh
@@hz1056you realise there's a red line yasir qadhi said muslims scholars must not cross? And yasir Gandhi said their are western scholars who are crossing the red line muslims are told not to cross and are asking questions and are writing about it today(4 years ago)?
Will The Real Koran please stand 🆙 ..?
Ahamdulilah
With his Yale Phd YQ still doesn't know that the word "Crises" is plural, the singular being "Crisis." He says "...it was a crises..." Face palm.
Maybe the a crisis which lead to mutliple crises?
So basically he got mad cause a fellow muslim had a valid question that they know they cant answer convincingly, if at all. Thats just hilarious. Imagine that, a scholar being scared of answering a question. His degrees shouldve been revoked 🤣🤣
You hear this! It's the Ulama-nati of Islam exposed. Telling us how deceitful Islam is. While we know that Jesus Christ the son of God is the way, the truth and the light and IS the straight path. What does Islam say about the straight path fellow Muslims? We pray you follow the straight path who is our Lord Jesus Christ whom I'm not worthy of either YET He prepares a way for those he calls.
Wow, Yasir was saying to Muhammad Hijab not to push him in Oder preventing him not to lie, because he has been lying to Western audiences for very long time saying Quran was preserved NO WORD NO LETTER NO DOT.
my question is simple where is the Quran verses talking about breastfeeding 10 times as well as stoning idolatry?
From analyzing this discussion and from someone who has looked into the nature of the qirat/preservation of the quran, here are my thoughts:
i gotta say that you guys cannot comprehend the discussion at all probably due to you lack of understanding of the science of the qirat as Sheikh Yasir mentioned!!
Firsltly, it is clear that Dr Yasir Qahdi holds that the quran is preserved!! He stated this multiple times throughout the interview. Espicially the last part of the discussion where he says that he holds that the quran we have is munazal (revelaed) and is preserved!!
But now there are ambigious statements which must be understood in light of the context and clear statements where he expressed his view that the quran is preserved!! * Btw this exact skill of analyzing statements through a methedology to arrive at a ruling is another science in islam called usul al fiqh !!
Therefore by logical necessity, these other ambigious statements cannot imply that he holds that the quran is not preserved!!
Secondly, let us understand his statements in light and context of a deeper understanding of the quranic sciences.
- Regarding "the standard narrative have holes in it" Dr Yasir was clearly refering to a deeper discussion regarding the various opinions on the nature and whateness of the ahruf!! There are at least 40 opinions/viewpoints on this matter as recorded and stated by imam suyuti (15th century) in Al-Itqan fi `Ulum al-Qur'an (Precision and Mastery in the Sciences of the Qur'an).
There are certain opinions of what constitutes an ahruf which are more "mainstream/standard" than others. But in Sheikh Yasir Qahdi's view, these opinions do not have the best explanatory scope!! Many opinions exist on the spectrum off the top of my head like the ahruf are dialects of the arabs or the ahruf or The ahruf are seven types of verses in the Qur'an: apparent, command, recommendation, specific, particular, general and parable, or Differences in pronunciation etc.
It seems one of the strongest out of the various opinions would be that the differences of the ahruf refer to "categories of difference" like one ahruf maybe about different ways to pronounce, or another harf is a different grammatical state, or another harf is a dialectual difference, or change in word etc.
thirdly, why Dr Qahdi took down the video is not to bring confusion to people as the statements made were very nuanced and complex which could confuse those not fammiliar with the discussion or some pre-requisite knowledge!!
- Also other statements like regarding the blank quran by Sheikh Qadi is also a nuanced point where if one understands the pre-requisite of the question, he would not be confused at all!! To put it simply, we cannot in one full sitting get the "exact" order of variants that the prophet (saw) read as the ahruf that exist (in the ten qirat standardized later) are all mixed!! We do not have 1 exact ahruf in a pure form!! Maybe this question is nonsensical if we take the above view of what the essence of the ahruf are.
Therefore the end off, I feel that all these islamaphobes just were too desperate to just hit islam with something!!
I feel that my explanation is rationally justified as I took both the clear/explicit statements and the ambigious statements into factor unlike the contrary view!!
These two Muslims they let the cat out of the bag 😂😂😂”SIN”has BIG HOLES IN IT.
Huh. Not really a big deal.
So, why did YQ take his video down?
They scrubbed it from the internet because it was such a big deal. You're coping.
The topic requires background knowledge to understand. It was removed because people with no knowledge use it in a way thay does not actually apply. For example liberals use this tactic to declare something is racist when race is not in any way involved. In this case the argument is applied to a topic that is completely unrelated.
@ He just challenged the orthodox position that the Quran is divinely protected. Non-Muslims are just posting what he said. No editing whatsoever. He could have just clarified his position, but he decided to take it down. Just shows how a big deal this is.
Plus, why did other LEARNED Muslims, like Farid, Abu Mussab Wajdi Akkari, Sheikh Karim Abuzayd, and many more attack YQ over this issue, if it was not a big deal?
@@richarddeleon2860 He did clarify it in another video. Some Muslims, just like in all other groups, love to make drama where none exists because people with low knowledge do not understand what they are talking about to begin with so they follow along with whatever makes them feel good.
Legacy which is filled with lies. Congratulation
1:18:00
Yasir talks some shit
Yes the shits of momo
There is no controversy what’s so ever
Why did Yasir Qadhi try to scrub this interview from the internet?
@@houseofhikmah because they took it out of context
@@houseofhikmah bc his teacher told him to
@@mr3zezw215 Who took it out of context?
Of course, just like kissing a pagan black stone like d pagans used to, is pure monotheism
If the Quran wasnt preserved then how would it be a miracle today, how would there be mathematical miracles, linguistic miracles, Historical Miracles, Scientific… how would there a balance of words, how would there be a checksum , .. Alhamdullilah for Islam!
There is no mathematical miracle, it's just feeding Quran into computer and finding words or numbers using formulas and then presenting them as miracles. You can find atleast 10 mathematical miracles in in every story book.
There is no scientific miracle as well bcoz it's all about twisting words to match with science after scientist invent it.
Just like Quran, Bible has miracles, Hindu scriptures has miracles. Nothing unique in Quran. Just do research about miracles in other scriptures and then u will understand what I'm talking about. Untill then u will keep believing that only Quran has miracles.
Ali Dawah even mentioned all these miracles were debunked/false😂 a few weeks ago
When Muslims are claiming on the one hand the miracles are real and on the other hand other Muslims are saying no it is not real you have to question what you are believing and how did he come to the conclusion that the miracles in the quran are debunked?
@@devanne3 your lying , Ali Dawah will never say something absurd like this
@@kay07949 Instead of researching my claims you just accuse me of lying. This is Muslims logic and is also the reason why I will not be continuing this conversation because no matter what facts I would bring you would make baseless accusations against me without looking into what I am saying, but here is the link to the video from his channel.
God bless you
ua-cam.com/video/kUZeMcdlQYk/v-deo.html
@@devanne3 this was also mentioned by hamza tzortzis years ago! 😂
Fraudian slip at 1:40:00
"Protect our sins"
You’re reading into it.
You should publicize your sins as it normalizes them.
If I smoke cigarettes or weed I shouldn’t tell my friends or family even if I did it in the past. Don’t try to play games
@@hz1056 I think you do not know what redemption and repentance or expiation is.
@@Vektordeformacio What does those things have to do with not publicizing your sins to the world?
I think I know more about those considering Allah SwT does not need a human god sacrifice to forgive his creation. Thanks try again buddy.
@@hz1056
You can expiate for your sins through repentance, by acting against your sins, renouncing them and being a better person while you understand your misdeeds.
As others accept this, you will be socially redeemed. But if you "protect your sins" by concealing them, letting them rot in you, you just become a worse person. Even worse if you lie about them.
You muslims do not understand the words you use.
@@Vektordeformacio This is hilarious to me,
the act of not showing others our sins is not to say pretend you don’t sin. The idea is not normalize a sin. Whatever someone is struggling with they should not nonchalantly talk about these things as it normalizes them.
Lastly, we actually have Hadiths and verses that tackle this problem of people not sinning in public and then going into private settings to sin without shame that their lord can see them.
I could waste my time by giving a full lecture with EVERYTHING we say about sinning but you are here to try to nitpick everything Islam related instead of actually learn so you can find real faults.
You Christian’s don’t understand that you guys know 0 have this narrow view that does not encompass our beliefs and then try to put your own insecurities onto us.
Sorry buddy, it’s not gonna work.
No mention of G.d. It's all about politics and their hunger for power.