I am super psyched for EU5 specifically for the economic overhaul. I LOVE building buildings and developing my nation. I’m a finance/econ major who is a lifelong scholar of history, and I love the idea of reforming a backward medieval fiefdom, into a modernized economic state!
Misconception, the aral sea had water level drops mostly after 1991 (end of soviet union) yes due to agriculture, in soviet rule they avoided or at least heavily regulated water drain from the sea due to its fishing importance to the region, wich today is almost inexistent.
I recently saw a video by another youtuber that his video had been demonetized because youtube mistook him saying "Samarkand" as a swear word and that the manual(!) review upheld that decision.
12:52 Yep, the Ural Hills. Paradox just hate mountains now. Just check on CK3, it's all hills, barely any mountains (i think they fixed some of that in byzantium in recent update but other places still are just HILLS)
Well the Urals are among the oldest mountains there is, and therefor erosion has made them very gentle, just look at some pictures, they really do t give the same vibes as the alps
Saying this I'm also very curious to see how these (proabably) "supposed-to-disdipate-factions" are going to work. I hope its not like "civil war countries" in HoI IV where you have the ability to just built up the provinces you keep and generally prepare for the dissolution war, which you then win super easily.
The split comment is weird, because the splits in the south Slavs is not dialectical for the most part except at its extremities, it is a split religion. If they were doing dialect splits it would not map onto modern ethnic groups
like with how english culture should start more divided but then unite I think russia would seriously benefit from some kind of cultural unification/genesis system to be able to unite the various cultures into one Russian over time
I don’t mind the markets. Not very intuitive for how it works, I didn’t know until this guy told me. Definitely some issues because of the differing sizes of areas
25:15 Strong disagree. Look at what they did to low saxon, it's one language, and every one of the speakers would either consider themselves saxon or germans. Paradox split it into 6 cultures.
Probably best to split up that detail in the trade map. As in the trade map is more like the previous tinto talks but clicking on a trade node shows the gradual access inside of it, which shows the data they offer in this Tinto Talk (preferably not stained glass style and/or thicc borders) for reference the culture group map mode in EU4 works similar like this.
The Erzya are represented, but not the Moksha. These two groups were (and still are) mislabled by Russian governments under the exonym "mordvin" and conflated to be the same people for almost a century, when in fact they are different peoples with similar but different languages and culture. It strikes me as odd that paradox would represent one but not the other. I think it's important for both of them to be represented, not just because both of them exist but to emphasize that these groups are not the same and can't be conflated.
In iberia leones could be a diferent culture but andalusian should not be. The start date is very close to the conquest of andalusia by the crown of castille, during that conquest a lot of the population was resettled people from farther North.
Tip for next week: Xinjiang sounds like "sheen-jyahng." (That said... Not sure it feels great to use the Chinese name given what's happening there these days, hopefully they'll use more neutral names or endonyms for the region instead)
Finally. My city Kherson is on correct Dnipro bank. I hate the fact that in EU4 Province Kherson don't include place where city is located.
🇺🇦🇺🇦
I bet people in Oleshky were glad though, that their location was the capital of Kherson 😆
they should remane it though. Wasn't Kherson build(or renamed) in XVIIth century after the Kherson/Chersonesum/Sevastopol?
I think the stained glass is more legible when zoomed in than previously but hard to read zoomed out.
I am super psyched for EU5 specifically for the economic overhaul. I LOVE building buildings and developing my nation. I’m a finance/econ major who is a lifelong scholar of history, and I love the idea of reforming a backward medieval fiefdom, into a modernized economic state!
The Aral Sea indeed used to be a lot bigger but was massively drained under the Soviets because of overintense use for agriculture.
Cotton moment
Misconception, the aral sea had water level drops mostly after 1991 (end of soviet union) yes due to agriculture, in soviet rule they avoided or at least heavily regulated water drain from the sea due to its fishing importance to the region, wich today is almost inexistent.
It was smaller until 16th century though
3:43 now I noticed you can see the lake baikal
Algorithm, bless this man today!
The algorithmn only accepts requests when sacrifices are included
I recently saw a video by another youtuber that his video had been demonetized because youtube mistook him saying "Samarkand" as a swear word and that the manual(!) review upheld that decision.
That's wild. Who was that?
@@Lord_Lambert Gamerzakh. The video is from 4 days ago.
12:52 Yep, the Ural Hills. Paradox just hate mountains now. Just check on CK3, it's all hills, barely any mountains (i think they fixed some of that in byzantium in recent update but other places still are just HILLS)
At 1.8k meters ita barely a mountain
Dinarids in balkans are up to that hight, wouldnt call it a mountain
Most of urals are hills with literally 4 peaks over 1500 meters, they are not steep though
Well the Urals are among the oldest mountains there is, and therefor erosion has made them very gentle, just look at some pictures, they really do t give the same vibes as the alps
The Ural Mountains in the north are more like the Alps, and in the south they are more like hills than mountains.
Ah I didnt know that, cool
I hope I will be able to change to the Crimean Khanate at some point when playing as the Golden Horde.
Saying this I'm also very curious to see how these (proabably) "supposed-to-disdipate-factions" are going to work.
I hope its not like "civil war countries" in HoI IV where you have the ability to just built up the provinces you keep and generally prepare for the dissolution war, which you then win super easily.
There are also should be mountains in Crimea. Mountain kingdom of Theodoro you know.
The split comment is weird, because the splits in the south Slavs is not dialectical for the most part except at its extremities, it is a split religion. If they were doing dialect splits it would not map onto modern ethnic groups
Nice video dude!
like with how english culture should start more divided but then unite I think russia would seriously benefit from some kind of cultural unification/genesis system to be able to unite the various cultures into one Russian over time
I don’t mind the markets. Not very intuitive for how it works, I didn’t know until this guy told me. Definitely some issues because of the differing sizes of areas
25:15 Strong disagree. Look at what they did to low saxon, it's one language, and every one of the speakers would either consider themselves saxon or germans. Paradox split it into 6 cultures.
it's a misstype, they meant "horde lovers"
Probably best to split up that detail in the trade map. As in the trade map is more like the previous tinto talks but clicking on a trade node shows the gradual access inside of it, which shows the data they offer in this Tinto Talk (preferably not stained glass style and/or thicc borders) for reference the culture group map mode in EU4 works similar like this.
The Erzya are represented, but not the Moksha. These two groups were (and still are) mislabled by Russian governments under the exonym "mordvin" and conflated to be the same people for almost a century, when in fact they are different peoples with similar but different languages and culture. It strikes me as odd that paradox would represent one but not the other. I think it's important for both of them to be represented, not just because both of them exist but to emphasize that these groups are not the same and can't be conflated.
In iberia leones could be a diferent culture but andalusian should not be. The start date is very close to the conquest of andalusia by the crown of castille, during that conquest a lot of the population was resettled people from farther North.
🤩
27:05 😎 wait...
WHERE ARE THE MEDICAMENTS MAN!?!?!😡
Wow.
@@Old_Sealand no way, no freaking way...😮 just...wow
ua-cam.com/video/PnpA7q1g6uQ/v-deo.html
Tip for next week: Xinjiang sounds like "sheen-jyahng."
(That said... Not sure it feels great to use the Chinese name given what's happening there these days, hopefully they'll use more neutral names or endonyms for the region instead)
It’s the name that has been non-Han for centuries as well. Tibet is not called Tibet in Tibetan for example.
Kazakhs💀💀💀
They still didn’t exist
Horse lovers 🤔
I do not like the watercolour
Hopefully you will like the terrain when that is finally shown off
I hope so too
lake baikal
That body of water in the societies of pops map is Gulf of Ob.