Demystifying Differential Pairs: 5 Common Myths Debunked!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 тра 2024
- Dive deep into the world of differential pairs with Tech Consultant Zach Peterson in this enlightening episode of Altium Academy! Zach addresses and debunks five common myths surrounding the design of differential pairs, using Altium Designer. From the misconception of tight coupling to the truth about vias and the importance of length matching, Zach provides valuable insights and examples using Altium's tools.
Follow along in Altium Designer as Zach explores real-world examples, dispelling myths and emphasizing the crucial considerations in designing differential pairs. Gain a deeper understanding of issues like ground placement, crosstalk, and the role of vias.
Zach also examines simulation results to showcase how to evaluate differential crosstalk and impedance matching. Learn about the impact of length-tuning sections on mode conversion and discover best practices to optimize your PCB design for high-frequency interfaces.
If you're passionate about PCB design, Altium Designer, or simply expanding your knowledge in differential pair design, hit the subscribe button, give the video a thumbs up, and leave your comments and questions below. Stay tuned for more insightful videos on mode conversion and differential crosstalk!
0:00 Intro
0:43 #1: Differential Pairs & Tight Coupling
3:29 #2: Differential Pairs & Ground
7:33 #3: Differential Pairs & Crosstalk
10:57 #4: Differential Pairs & Vias
13:20 #5: Differential Pairs & Length Matching
For more PCB Layout videos, click here: • PCB Layout
For more PCB Design for Beginners videos, click here: • PCB Design for Beginners
For more Tech Consultant Zach Peterson videos, click here: • Technical Consultant Z...
👉 What Are Differential Pairs?: • What Are Differential ...
👉 Stubs and Backdrilling in High-Speed Design - Part One: • Stubs and Backdrilling...
👉 S-Parameters Explained Part One | Signal Integrity: • S-Parameters Explained...
👉 Differential Pair Impedance: Using a Calculator to Design Your PCB: resources.altium.com/p/differ...
👉 15 Days Free Altium Designer Access: www.altium.com/promotions/alt...
Don't forget to follow us on social to stay up-to-date on the latest Altium Academy content.
👉 Follow Altium on TikTok: / altiumdesigner
👉 Follow Altium on Twitter: / altium
👉 Follow Altium on Linkedin: / altium
👉 Follow Altium on Facebook: / altiumofficial
👉 Ready to try the industry's best-in-class design experience yourself? Download it today and get started! www.altium.com/downloads?utm_...
The Altium Academy is an online experience created to bring modern education to PCB Designers and Engineers all across the world. Here you can access a vast library of free training and educational content covering everything from basic design to advanced principles and step-by-step walkthroughs. Join industry legends as they share their career knowledge, review real-life design projects, or learn how to leverage one of Altium's leading design tools. No matter your level of experience, the Altium Academy can help you become a better Designer and Engineer!
About Altium LLC
Altium LLC (ASX:ALU), a global software company based in San Diego, California, is accelerating the pace of innovation through electronics. From individual inventors to multinational corporations, more PCB designers and engineers choose Altium software to design and realize electronics-based products.
#AltiumDesigner #PCBdesign #ElectronicsEngineering - Наука та технологія
My short version has always been: "tightly coupled" = as close to each other as realistically possible while keeping the characteristic impedance of the line. no breaks in the ground plane under the pair.
Informative as always
This should be good. My guesses: Myth 1 - differential pairs need to be routed close together, Myth 2 - return path "doesn't matter", Myth 3 - it doesn't matter where you match lengths so long as the full run is length matched, Myth 4 - you *need* to match lengths *exactly*, Myth 5 - there's something magical about 100 Ohms
Actually myth 2 is "You always/never need ground"
@@Zachariah-Peterson so close!
@@Zachariah-Peterson from definition the differential pair do not need any reference plane but here we can see if we apply some reference plane then track width and space are easier to build. I hope Eric Bogatin explain this problems correctly.
For point 2, I hear so many different things on this topic. Rick Hartley says to treat Differential Pairs as 2 single ended lines, but you say otherwise. Which guru do I listen to? Thanks.
Rick Hartley and I are saying the exact same thing. What I am telling you is that in order to set one trace's impedance to a target value when there is no ground plane, you need to have the other trace close by because there is mutual inductance and mutual capacitance between the two traces. Once you do this, the signal on one trace will still be treated as its own signal. In the case where you have the ground plane, the odd-mode impedance of a single trace is what matters and what determines reflection from an individual pin as well as the propagation delay. The difference is that you do not need to have the 2nd trace close by just to get the impedance to a target value. The other differences between the two situations are radiation of common mode noise and creation/reception of differential crosstalk.
EDIT: Rick Hartley sat in an audience of a PCB East presentation I gave earlier this year and affirmed everything I stated in my comment.
Can you make video, how to make library componen
Is simbior included in an Altium product?
The Layer Stack Manager in Altium Designer uses the Simbeor 2D solver to calculate trace impedance and propagation constant without losses and dispesion. In frequency ranges where the dielectric constant is stable and losses are low, the results are very accurate the engine and runs in the backend of Altium Designer.
Engaging video! Most of these seem like "oversimplifications" rather than "myths" per se. One point of interest is in juxtaposing #2 "Differential pairs and ground" versus #5 "Differential pairs and length matching". In the latter, there's a subsidiary point about placing the length-tuning sections near to the inhomogeneity, so that we avoid "mode conversion". Mode conversion appears where the pair has been designed to achieve the target impedance through coupling of the two conductors (instead of proximity to ground plane) and the signals on the two wires get substantially out-of-step (one is delayed relative to the other). Now the two out-of-step signals just function more like two independent signals, with the coupling providing crosstalk between the two wires. Aka unwanted common-mode signal.
OK, but that problem would not arise (or be far less) where the target impedance has been achieved primarily through proximity to ground plane (as described in #2), and not through interaction of the two conductors with each other. In that case, presumably one could place the tuning sections wherever one wanted with no ill effects. All that matters is that the total travel time along each path is a good match. I'm not saying that is something to try to do unnecessarily, just pointing out this interesting interaction between two of these "myths".
USB is easy. Try routing 4 pairs of ethernet, from one RJ45 port to another RJ45 port that is turned 180 degrees....