This model has an advantage few other speakers possess. The drivers are all made from the same material. You cannot separate the drivers with your ear. Ultra high end is festooned with exotic tweeters but they are in no way similar to their bass drivers. You have to live with the incongruity. These play in harmony across their 26-40khz response. They are dissected in a display at Yamaha's amazing Innovation Road Museum in Hammamatsu, Japan. If you can then you must.
These are the speakers of my dreams! 😍 But since I can’t afford them I had to go for some Indiana line dj 310 and a yamaha a-s301. Still these sounds really good!!
Here we have another snob who disregard Yamaha just for the same of be a Yamaha, but drool over overpriced snob speakers which don't sound nearly as good as these. Plenty of good reviews around. Even better than some more expensive Wilson.
@@JohnDoe-rn3jy I agree John, I've got these speaker at home, very sound amazing, their very reasonably priced considering the sound stage, highs , mid's, extended bass and build quality, but as always their only as good as what you feed them with
@@corvette820 I believe him. We visited the Yamaha Innovation Road museum in Hamamatsu, Japan. They have grand pianos costing multiples of NS 5000. But there is also a display of NS 5000 cut open and disassembled. Signage says the speaker was by a team of young engineers. It also displays the zylon (carbon fiber) driver material in different manufacturing stages. The woofer coil is literally one pound of copper. The back wave dampers look like tumble generators. As you peruse the museum vou notice the exhaustive research (world's largest musical instrument maker) in resonance with wood in violins, guitars, pianos, etc. Hence NS 5000's mitered joint plywood construction is deliberate. Few names at any price point can match the research, resources, buying power, and pro audio ubiquity behind this speaker with its drivers all of the same material. It is not for flea watt amps. $15K is real money. Do your own research.
I have had a Yamaha YSP-4000 soundbar for over 10 years. Probably have it running over 5 hours a day. You can tweet it to your hearts content and it runs like it's brand new out of the box. Yamaha electronics are basically very good.. Good video. I like it.
Well done again sir! I would like to hear some more of this setup with a few other recordings. It seemed a little on the bright side with little in the bass region. To me it would be tiring after a while! But that’s my personal opinion an like I say, that’s why they make chocolate, strawberry an vanilla! Thanks again for your Friday wonders! It’s definitely a weekly treat!!!
That Accuphase gear OMG! TBH, I bet any speaker would sound great in that room! Great treatments. But for 60,000-100,000 dollars, I doubt that would be my choice. The amp alone is 30,000!
Для космоса материал от динамиков наверное и хороший,но вот здесь явно не туда.По сравнению со старыми 1000ми и 2000ми в пользу старых без каких либо проб.Но на моё ухо,как остальным их дело.
How do you hear them on your PC ?? I have my sound card going through Krell amp and Soundlab electrostatic speakers and still can't tell how Accuphase and Yamaha sounds like. What am I missing or doing wrong? I see the comments and I wonder. Please advise... Thank you. Do you understand that even if you had identical equipment at home listening to UA-cam is 330 kbps. This is MP3 . Even crappy CD is 1.411 kbps not mentioning SACD or high definition files. So please How do you taste and smell your ice cream from your monitors??? You want to be even more silly? Than you should demonstrate this with Orange fuses and than $200.00 Purple fuses please. Also I have to mention that you are NOT really listening to Accuphase and Yamaha speakers at all. You are listening to the microphones that captured this event. Even if it was AKG C24 or Neumann SM69 mics used with Sound Devices recorder and I seriously doubt it, you are still listening to the microphones and MP3 resolution.
They almost sounded honky with that recording. Or maybe it was your mic or the recording. Impossible to really tell. Not worth the price they're asking though.
Hmm, not sure why, but these don't sound very good to me, compared to a lot of the videos on this channel. The instruments don't sound authentic at all, it's like it's just a bunch of noise, not music. Maybe my ears are just having an "off" day!
I think that it’s a problem with the camera that he is using because in reality these do sound real good! But yh I agree that in this recording the sound is overwhelmed.
@@baabdesigns9179 I listen to all of this guy's video recordings and am familiar with his sound quality. I guess it's possible this recording was worse than the others, but I doubt it.
Questo genere di diffusori ha un errore di progetto di base a mio modesto parere. Nello specifico il midtweeter a cupola non potrà mai scendere di frequenza per riprodurre la voce in fase con il woofer, pertanto il suono sarà sempre scollato o smaterializzato nell frequenze centrali. Certamente con musica strumentale il problema è ridumensionato, tuttavia non esisterà mai un crossover in grado di gestire al meglio questo 3 vie, generando grosse perdite qualitative a causa del taglio di frequenza.(ipotizzo tra 500-1500 Hz) Poi vogliamo parlare della velocità del midtweeter abbinato al woofer con sospensione in gomma ad alta escursione ? suvvia è palese l’assurdità 🤭
Ovvia, giu'! Scendi in ulteriori dettagli! 🤣BTW Il taglio e' a 750Hz. Ma si, il diffusore sembra complicato, costoso, $15k, e non molto 'musicale'. La riproduzione e' dettagliata ma non mi non spinge a soffermarsi e acoltare. Con il prezzo siamo a livello WVL SON che sono un' altra cosa. 😉
@@interesting7906 non risulta “musicale” per colpa del crossover, delle rotazioni di fase, e della velocità di risposta del woofer nelle frequenze standard in cui l’orecchio umano è più sensibile. Più il woofer (che rammento è lento) sale di frequenza, più “sporca” e toglie naturalezza, pertanto se il taglio è 750hz, è una vera e propria martellata sui OO. Poi se vogliamo parlare di MyFi e registrazioni multitraccia sintetizzata digitale, dove la fase è un optional del DJ di turno, alzo le mani e ognuno può buttare i propri soldi dove gli pare 😁
@@stefanotoi4025 Grazie del commento classico, stile Aloia. Roba da Suono anni 80'.🤣 Anche se daccordo che sonicamente i diffusori son morti, e' difficile giudicare le regioni senza avere i dati in mano, risposta, impedenza e fase. Per non parlare di misure di intermodulazione e lo schema xover.
@@interesting7906 non servono avere in mano misure, quando è palese l’inerzia meccanica di un woofer rispetto all’inerzia meccanica di un midtweeter. Estremizzando è come abbinare un tweeter di Heil con woofer: stesso concetto, le misure le dovresti calcolare con la fase corretta che ti arriva all’orecchio. Impossibile se non con celle di ritardo che uccidono il suono sia attive o passive. Per farti capire: se tu emetti un impulso sonoro registrato come premere tutti i tasti di un pianoforte contemporaneamente, quali note sentiresti arrivare per prima alle tue orecchie ad un determinato istante temporale con questi diffusori ? le note emesse dal woofer arriveranno sempre moolto dopo causando sfasamenti. E non serve disturbare Aloia o il feedback zero o altri concetti tecnici. È l’esperienza che ti permette di comprendere quanto da me esposto. Spero di aver chiarito il mio pensiero.
@@stefanotoi4025 Sono confuso. Ma di che esperienza parli? Passi da parlare di impressioni soggettive perfettamente valide a concetti 'pseudo tecnici' che non hanno senso. Tutte queste esperienze possono essere provate o disprovate con una serie di semplici misure. Non sono un esperto di misure ma i dati che ho visto sono molto chiari e riflettono le qualita' soniche. Le misure sono misure, simulazioni e calcoli sono un'altra cose. Tutti i woofer hanno la massa x100 la massa del tweeter. Stai dicendo che tutti i diffusori con woofer e tweeter sono 'sbagliati'? Per chiarezza, forse dovresti partire con un esempio di tuo diffusore ideale.
The bass sounds really loose on the speaker definitely not as good as the monitor audio platinum or gold and way overpriced at $15,000, what a joke that is, Yamaha has never been regarded world-class at anything mid-fi at best, nowhere near as three-dimensional and open as the monitor audio gold and platinum so for that price I'd rather buy the platinum which is a much better speaker. The sound stage does not envelop the room like the monitor audios do.
![GREAT JAZZ on JBL S4700 Loudspeakers [4Kᵁᴴᴰ] | with McIntosh MC3500 Tube Amplifiers](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RsAA2XauraY/mqdefault.jpg)
The speakers are very special and the look is timeless.
Track is "Elena's Bossa" performed by Accordi Disaccordi (composed by Gonzalo Bergara.... You have to give both credit for such a nice demo
yes! lovely video and great sound with the accuphase!
True successor to the legend of NS-1000M and family and its been paired to the best compliment, Accuphase P-7500.
Perfection!
This model has an advantage few other speakers possess. The drivers are all made from the same material. You cannot separate the drivers with your ear. Ultra high end is festooned with exotic tweeters but they are in no way similar to their bass drivers. You have to live with the incongruity. These play in harmony across their 26-40khz response. They are dissected in a display at Yamaha's amazing Innovation Road Museum in Hammamatsu, Japan. If you can then you must.
26hz - 40khz is -10db value
I wish yamaha had stated -3db value.
Beautiful set up,great sound,thank's for uploading this.👍
These are the speakers of my dreams! 😍 But since I can’t afford them I had to go for some Indiana line dj 310 and a yamaha a-s301. Still these sounds really good!!
Indiana Line? Yamaha? I think you need to revise your dreams. If you need to dream you might as well dream BIG. These are total duds.
Edifier R2855db Cheaper than this but sounds better.
You don't know anything. These speakers are really good, much better than some other boutique brands snob stuff
Here we have another snob who disregard Yamaha just for the same of be a Yamaha, but drool over overpriced snob speakers which don't sound nearly as good as these. Plenty of good reviews around. Even better than some more expensive Wilson.
@@JohnDoe-rn3jy I agree John, I've got these speaker at home, very sound amazing, their very reasonably priced considering the sound stage, highs , mid's, extended bass and build quality, but as always their only as good as what you feed them with
Gran sonido, muy capaces de dejar en alto la valla estos yamaha
Epic and sublime...Thank you for showing it...Greetings from here...Argentina.
Thank you!
ottimo suono... caldo e presente zero colore, basso veloce ma generoso....
Shouldn't the speakers be reversed to minimise tweeter and midrange to cabinet reflections to the listening position?
Truly excellent sound and setup.
Dream system, tweeters should be on the inside surely
Really wonderful speakers. Do you prefer the speakers with the tweeters out or in?
Wow!
Buenas noches a todos 🙋♂️🎼🎶💖👍. Una exelente combinación, son pura sangre 👌
magnifico.💯💯💯💯💯💯
Yamaha put a lot of effort in those !
Heard this yamaha against a more expensive magico & the yamaha made the magico sound nasal, constricted & simply unnatural.
And the price is absurdly Magic....
God knows why I don’ t believe you.
@@corvette820 I believe him. We visited the Yamaha Innovation Road museum in Hamamatsu, Japan. They have grand pianos costing multiples of NS 5000. But there is also a display of NS 5000 cut open and disassembled. Signage says the speaker was by a team of young engineers. It also displays the zylon (carbon fiber) driver material in different manufacturing stages. The woofer coil is literally one pound of copper. The back wave dampers look like tumble generators.
As you peruse the museum vou notice the exhaustive research (world's largest musical instrument maker) in resonance with wood in violins, guitars, pianos, etc. Hence NS 5000's mitered joint plywood construction is deliberate. Few names at any price point can match the research, resources, buying power, and pro audio ubiquity behind this speaker with its drivers all of the same material. It is not for flea watt amps. $15K is real money. Do your own research.
not a hard feat
These should be placed with tweeters in (according to Yamaha recommendation)
Would love to hear the Yamaha against the Focal Sopra 3 with the same Accuphase electronics.
Very nice room isolation 👍
Yamaha.... !
Тоесть согласовать средне и низко частотник так и не смогли...
What are you using to record the sound in this video with?
Topissime !!👍👍
I have had a Yamaha YSP-4000 soundbar for over 10 years. Probably have it running over 5 hours a day. You can tweet it to your hearts content and it runs like it's brand new out of the box. Yamaha electronics are basically very good.. Good video. I like it.
Damn - I didn't know they were that big!
Un super duo Yamaha Accuphase 😉
Well done again sir!
I would like to hear some more of this setup with a few other recordings.
It seemed a little on the bright side with little in the bass region. To me it would be tiring after a while!
But that’s my personal opinion an like I say, that’s why they make chocolate, strawberry an vanilla!
Thanks again for your Friday wonders!
It’s definitely a weekly treat!!!
THE BEST..👏👏👏🇧🇷
Do you have a Spotify playlist, I would like to follow you!
Красота
Где?)
Clarity!
For those commenting on bad sounds... its honestly the room. This is a very small room and although treated is not ideal.
Plus the speakers are placed backwards.
@@stonecoldcustoms Yup you are 100% right. Tweeters should be in.
That Accuphase gear OMG! TBH, I bet any speaker would sound great in that room! Great treatments. But for 60,000-100,000 dollars, I doubt that would be my choice. The amp alone is 30,000!
Just get Yamaha separates. You don't need Accuphase separates.
these sound awesome through my $25 Skullcandy earbuds
Waiting for Yamaha amplifiers to become as powerful as Accuphase but those prices
😄😄😍😍
I would pair the accuphase with something tonally darker, probably a uk speaker.
初めて１０００Ｍを聴いた時の衝撃的な素材ベリリウムの音、あれから４０年、(綾小路きみまろさんのコントでは無いですが)またも衝撃的な素材ザイロン、とうとうウーハーにまで新素材で統一してしまったヤマハの技術。約１０倍近い価格も決して高額では無いと思わせる音、さすが楽器メーカーの底力を見た気がします。エンクロージャ内部もこれまた、バイクメーカーでも有るヤマハのマフラーの消音技術を駆使して、吸音材を使わない吸音方法など現在考えられる技術をふんだんに使って作られたスピーカーですね。実際に聴いた事が無いので音の評価は出来ませんが、凄いリアルな音がするのでしょうね。
🥰👏👏👏
It would cost less to invite the artist and play for one month every day from your living room. They’d even do the cleaning and cook 😅
It sounds marvelous whith my beats
Match my piano 👍🎹🎹🎹🎹🎹🎹🎹🎹🎌
Для космоса материал от динамиков наверное и хороший,но вот здесь явно не туда.По сравнению со старыми 1000ми и 2000ми в пользу старых без каких либо проб.Но на моё ухо,как остальным их дело.
The sound is OK, but I can't see the guitarist on the video 😊
Bowie were are wey now please
You can buy use car with these!
Man these are an expensive pair.
How do you hear them on your PC ?? I have my sound card going through Krell amp and Soundlab electrostatic speakers and still can't tell how Accuphase and Yamaha sounds like. What am I missing or doing wrong? I see the comments and I wonder. Please advise... Thank you. Do you understand that even if you had identical equipment at home listening to UA-cam is 330 kbps. This is MP3 . Even crappy CD is 1.411 kbps not mentioning SACD or high definition files. So please How do you taste and smell your ice cream from your monitors??? You want to be even more silly? Than you should demonstrate this with Orange fuses and than $200.00 Purple fuses please. Also I have to mention that you are NOT really listening to Accuphase and Yamaha speakers at all. You are listening to the microphones that captured this event. Even if it was AKG C24 or Neumann SM69 mics used with Sound Devices recorder and I seriously doubt it, you are still listening to the microphones and MP3 resolution.
I’ ve never been a fan of berillium tweeters… Too cold in my opinion… Maybe this is better…?
Ear Ache Central
The speakers must be swopped around
Even the best stereo does not play good for me if the tones settings are at zero. Sorry you guys are wrong
Ok Mr I Am Right.
Ummm, they're backwards R and L ...
It’s always the same. Super setup for 50k and one guitar music. Wtf.
They almost sounded honky with that recording. Or maybe it was your mic or the recording. Impossible to really tell. Not worth the price they're asking though.
Слушал в связке с 5000 серией Ямахи (винил и усиление). Резкий, режущий, неприятный звук. Не понравилось.
Love yamahas musicians instruments, but speakers not my sound.
Nice and cheap
Hmm, not sure why, but these don't sound very good to me, compared to a lot of the videos on this channel. The instruments don't sound authentic at all, it's like it's just a bunch of noise, not music. Maybe my ears are just having an "off" day!
The recorded classical guitar is noisey for sure. Strings may have been beaten/ worn. I think it’s a nylon which can sound flat…
I think that it’s a problem with the camera that he is using because in reality these do sound real good! But yh I agree that in this recording the sound is overwhelmed.
@@o_o-_-8639 Maybe, but his other videos usually sound great.
you are listening to a recording on youtube
@@baabdesigns9179 I listen to all of this guy's video recordings and am familiar with his sound quality. I guess it's possible this recording was worse than the others, but I doubt it.
Questo genere di diffusori ha un errore di progetto di base a mio modesto parere.
Nello specifico il midtweeter a cupola non potrà mai scendere di frequenza per riprodurre la voce in fase con il woofer, pertanto il suono sarà sempre scollato o smaterializzato nell frequenze centrali.
Certamente con musica strumentale il problema è ridumensionato, tuttavia non esisterà mai un crossover in grado di gestire al meglio questo 3 vie, generando grosse perdite qualitative a causa del taglio di frequenza.(ipotizzo tra 500-1500 Hz)
Poi vogliamo parlare della velocità del midtweeter abbinato al woofer con sospensione in gomma ad alta escursione ? suvvia è palese l’assurdità 🤭
Ovvia, giu'! Scendi in ulteriori dettagli! 🤣BTW Il taglio e' a 750Hz. Ma si, il diffusore sembra complicato, costoso, $15k, e non molto 'musicale'. La riproduzione e' dettagliata ma non mi non spinge a soffermarsi e acoltare. Con il prezzo siamo a livello WVL SON che sono un' altra cosa. 😉
@@interesting7906 non risulta “musicale” per colpa del crossover, delle rotazioni di fase, e della velocità di risposta del woofer nelle frequenze standard in cui l’orecchio umano è più sensibile. Più il woofer (che rammento è lento) sale di frequenza, più “sporca” e toglie naturalezza, pertanto se il taglio è 750hz, è una vera e propria martellata sui OO.
Poi se vogliamo parlare di MyFi e registrazioni multitraccia sintetizzata digitale, dove la fase è un optional del DJ di turno, alzo le mani e ognuno può buttare i propri soldi dove gli pare 😁
@@stefanotoi4025 Grazie del commento classico, stile Aloia. Roba da Suono anni 80'.🤣 Anche se daccordo che sonicamente i diffusori son morti, e' difficile giudicare le regioni senza avere i dati in mano, risposta, impedenza e fase. Per non parlare di misure di intermodulazione e lo schema xover.
@@interesting7906 non servono avere in mano misure, quando è palese l’inerzia meccanica di un woofer rispetto all’inerzia meccanica di un midtweeter. Estremizzando è come abbinare un tweeter di Heil con woofer: stesso concetto, le misure le dovresti calcolare con la fase corretta che ti arriva all’orecchio. Impossibile se non con celle di ritardo che uccidono il suono sia attive o passive. Per farti capire: se tu emetti un impulso sonoro registrato come premere tutti i tasti di un pianoforte contemporaneamente, quali note sentiresti arrivare per prima alle tue orecchie ad un determinato istante temporale con questi diffusori ? le note emesse dal woofer arriveranno sempre moolto dopo causando sfasamenti. E non serve disturbare Aloia o il feedback zero o altri concetti tecnici.
È l’esperienza che ti permette di comprendere quanto da me esposto. Spero di aver chiarito il mio pensiero.
@@stefanotoi4025 Sono confuso. Ma di che esperienza parli? Passi da parlare di impressioni soggettive perfettamente valide a concetti 'pseudo tecnici' che non hanno senso. Tutte queste esperienze possono essere provate o disprovate con una serie di semplici misure. Non sono un esperto di misure ma i dati che ho visto sono molto chiari e riflettono le qualita' soniche. Le misure sono misure, simulazioni e calcoli sono un'altra cose.
Tutti i woofer hanno la massa x100 la massa del tweeter. Stai dicendo che tutti i diffusori con woofer e tweeter sono 'sbagliati'? Per chiarezza, forse dovresti partire con un esempio di tuo diffusore ideale.
Why are the speakers placed backwards? Terrible demo.
sounds good but articifial. paper cone is the way to go. this has a digital glare, nothing special.
Прекрасная композиция! 👍😍
С однообразным окрасом все инструменты воспроизводятся...
Ok, i think Edifier R2850db is better and overwhelmingly Cheaper.
Great Speakers, but auwful sound! Just a mess and noise.
These speakers are terrible. Incoherent. Noise. Terrible! I can't undo what I just heard!
Отвратительный звук!
The bass sounds really loose on the speaker definitely not as good as the monitor audio platinum or gold and way overpriced at $15,000, what a joke that is, Yamaha has never been regarded world-class at anything mid-fi at best, nowhere near as three-dimensional and open as the monitor audio gold and platinum so for that price I'd rather buy the platinum which is a much better speaker. The sound stage does not envelop the room like the monitor audios do.
Sound bad
Too bright