To see subtitles in other languages: Click on the gear symbol under the video, then click on "subtitles." Then select the language (You may need to scroll up and down to see all the languages available). --To change subtitle appearance: Scroll to the top of the language selection window and click "options." In the options window you can, for example, choose a different font color and background color, and set the "background opacity" to 100% to help make the subtitles more readable. --To turn the subtitles "on" or "off" altogether: Click the "CC" button under the video. --If you believe that the translation in the subtitles can be improved, please send me an email.
UNDERSTANDING TIME (AND TIME DILATION) PURSUANT TO THE BALANCED, THEORETICAL, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL PROOF THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA (OF NECESSITY): Stellar clustering ALSO proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy, AS E=MC2 is clearly F=ma IN BALANCE !!! This explains the fourth dimension AND the term c4 (from Einstein's field equations). Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE; AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Accordingly, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. So, it makes perfect sense that the planets will move away from WHAT IS THE SUN very, very, very SLIGHTLY. Carefully consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE !!! (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. (Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS clearly F=ma IN BALANCE.) Carefully consider what is the speed of light (c). A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light (c); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS clearly F=ma ON BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky !!! Indeed, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Carefully consider what is THE EARTH/ground AND what is THE EYE ON BALANCE !!! The sky is BLUE, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. THE EARTH is a BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE form in relation to the speed of light (c) AND what is THE SUN (AS what is a linked AND BALANCED opposite) pursuant to the universal (and CLEAR) fact that E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=MC2 IS clearly proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE. Carefully consider what is THE EARTH/ground !!! Great. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Accordingly, objects (AND WHAT IS the falling MAN) fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE. Gravity is clearly ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy, AS E=MC2 is clearly F=ma IN BALANCE !!! It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense, AS BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 is clearly F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE !!! (Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental.) I have mathematically unified physics/physical experience, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE !!! GREAT !!! ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! By Frank DiMeglio
Batteries have both positive and negative charges in equal amounts. They are therefore electrically neutral, and this is not the reason batteries create a voltage. The reason is because the two terminals are made out of different metals, which attract electrons with different strength. Inside the battery, the two metals are connected through a salt bridge, which allows electrically charged ions to flow, keeping both terminals electrically neutral as they chemically interact with these ions.
If the battery is neutral, where is it getting the extra energy to create a current flow? And surely the metal terminals have way more resistance than the atoms themselves so any available charges would flow from atom to atom and short out due to there being both positive and negative charge in the same place! And opposites attract! So technically, the battery should not work but we know that it does! So something is wrong with your explanation!
@@PeterMilanovski I think part of what makes it work is the physical separation of the different chemicals inside the battery across a gradient, which creates the potential energy to induce the flow of charged particles through the wire outside the battery, since it's a redox reaction and the electrons need some way to travel across the gradient to release the potential energy of the system. The wire is the path of least resistance for that to occur, so the current travels through the wire instead of through the battery itself. Also, I think electrically neutral means something different than 'no potential energy available'. A box full of an equal quantity of positively and negatively charged particles that have been separated by a barrier has potential energy because the particles are trying to move back towards each other. The entire box as a whole has a net charge of zero, but the individual charges themselves still have potential energy to move.
@@icarus313 yes, what you are saying is what is being taught in school but it's not the only way to look at it! Let's take a look at another form of energy storage, let's take a hydroelectric power station. What we have is a dam of water as a means of energy storage, there's water on both sides of the dam wall! The only difference between the two water's is the difference in potential, it's not that the water on one side is positively charged and negative on the other! How would that work if in fact that were the true case? What would happen if the two water's should come in contact with each other? But we both know that this isn't the case with water, it's the same no matter where it is. The idea that there's a positive charge and a negative charge is wrong! The person who coined the term positive and negative didn't mean that there are two charges of opposite polarity! He actually meant that you have to understand it as credit and debit! When he said plus and minus, he ment that one side is in credit of electons while the other side is in debit, as in negative! It was George Washington himself that coined those terms and everyone else misunderstood it. Every time you see the plus and minus signs, look at it as if it's all the same charge but in a difference of potential! This is the original and true theory as discovered by George Washington and the theory works perfectly, you can use the one that everyone is using today but it only goes so far until things don't make sense, whereas the original theory can be applied to explain anything! If you haven't already read anything from Benjamin Franklin and his experiments with electricity and lightning, then you are missing out big time! But the catch is, pay close attention to his description of what is happening with electricity and try to look at it with fresh eyes! Otherwise you just might miss it just like everyone else has. Now that that's out of the way, let's go back to the hydroelectric power station! We have a serious problem here! While we know that water has an electric charge, it's not where we derive our electricity from, you might say that the only reason why we use the water to begin with is because it naturally falls on higher land and due to the other great unknown that we call gravity, it wants to flow to the lowest point where it can equalise itself in relation to the other water. So the electricity must be coming from somewhere inside the generator! But where? Is it coming from the magnet? If so, why hasn't the magnet run out of electricity? Or maybe the electricity is already in the copper coils and is only being moved back and forth by the magnet? Or maybe as the magnet passed the coil if copper, it pushed the electricity out of the way and more electricity is pulled out of the atmosphere (think of how a switch mode power supply works by creating a magnetic field around an inductor in one direction but by switching the direction and applying more electricity, you get the combined voltages to double at the output at the expense of current at the input! That's fair enough, but we are powering a complete city with electricity and it has to come from somewhere! Energy can't be created nor destroyed so that means that it can only come from somewhere else! So does that mean that the magnet is actually making electricity out of nothing? The electric charge has to exist somewhere for the humble generator to take it and send it to you! But the ultimate question still remains, where? There's no answer to this question so far, we know that a generator works and we know that if we move a magnet across a coil of wire it will produce a current, but where did the current come from to begin with and does it go back to where it originated from to equalise itself just like the water from the mountain to the sea? If you can answer this question, then you will be the smartest person to ever walk the earth 🌎. This is what I'm working on...
Everyone, if you enjoyed this video, you can help more people find it in their UA-cam Searches by clicking the like button under the video and writing a comment. Links to some of my other physics videos are available at the end of the video up above at 11:22. Thanks.
Eugene Khutoryansky nice job brother! you should teach in out reach programs with all these visuals. I'm sure it will be a hit. Another request if you may take one, can you make a video about PV devices? A similar video like this explaining the phenomenon will make it so much easier to understand. Hope all is well!
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. Eugene Khutoryansky understands it well enough, that's why this was explained so well and elegantly. Very simple, yet powerful explanation. Thank You
that's what I was thinking about.. delivering information to people more important than discoverting it.. it gives a chance for upgrading the old legacy info
@@RHINO41153 We can describe it as a field like with gravity can be tought as bodies with mass attracting each other than curvature of space time. My point is that it's just an analogy to get our head around something than (taking the example of gravity) calculating the einstein field equation for calculating the orbit of earth, Newtonian gravity is a better for this. Same as for a field.
@@rektlzz7808 I stand by comment. From the very start you said "Describe", a description is not an explanation! A Field is not a thing in and of itself. The same goes for gravity, gravity is an effect. And as for Einstein, he has contributed absolutely nothing! If you want to use analogies gravity is just like a shadow, a shadow has no properties, it's an effect of the absence of light nothing more. Many things can be described, but that tells you nothing about what is going on, it's not an Explanation. Just like people using "a wave" as if it is a thing in and of itself, using it as if it is something traveling in a direction, such as away or towards something else...it is not! For instance, say we are standing at the opposite sides of a pond of clear still calm water and I threw a rock into it, it would produce ripples, or waves, are they traveling? As in moving towards you or I, or anything else...NO! The water is merely oscillating up and down until it comes to rest after losing the energy of the rocks disturbance, same water molecules ending right where they started, that holds true for any type of wave, be it sound and even Light! Perturbations in a medium, nothing more, nothing less, nothing is traveling. Things can be described very easily, but try to explain what is really going on, that is why a "description is Not an explanation! I'm sure I hit a nerve in the mention of Einstein, but every one of his theories have no merit when it comes to Physics and have been debunked numerous times. Einsteins Space/Time is absolutely absurd and ludicrous! As if you can bend Space and Time which are not 'Things'...they have No Properties, and cannot be Quantified. And as to Light, Light has No Speed, and nothing Emits Light such as a Photon...which by "Definition" is a "Virtual Particle" with no Mass! Anyone who believes that Light is being emitted from, and I don't care what the source, be it a candle, a Light bulb or the Sun needs to rethink it...how can light from a candle and light from the Sun travel at the exact same speed, they can't given the so called light particle the photon. It is a rate of induction by way of perturbation in a medium, same as my analogy of a wave in a pond, a wave is what something does, not what it is! So as to "a Field", a Field has no properties, none! It's where things are observed and take place, and then described. I'm writing this reply on my phone which is difficult, otherwise, if I was on a computer I would have probably done a better job in my wording. You can respond, or Not. I'm pretty sure I know your model of the universe, it's the bumping particles universe of mainstream...and I once thought that way, until there were too many things that didn't make sense and have taken on a completely different model, much simpler but not simplex. There are many physicists in the mainstream that share this model but not willing to speak up because their very livelihoods and careers would be on the line.
@@Snoo29293 That's very true! To fully understand how electricity and magnetism work, it's necessary to know the equations behind them. It's similar to general relativity: an analogy like geodesics is a useful visual tool, but it never tells the full story. Knowledge of Einstein's field equations is required to truly understand what's going on.
You can help translate this video by adding subtitles in other languages. To add a translation, click on the following link: ua-cam.com/users/timedtext_video?v=XiHVe8U5PhU&ref=share You will then be able to add translations for all the subtitles. You will also be able to provide a translation for the title of the video. Please remember to hit the submit button for both the title and for the subtitles, as they are submitted separately. Details about adding translations is available at support.google.com/youtube/answer/6054623?hl=en Thanks.
Look at it from Einstein's Theory of Relativity: Each charged particle can believe that it is standing still, and not creating a magnetic field. An observer who thinks the charge is moving will see the charge as shorter and having a higher charge density, and therefore having a stronger electric field in the direction perpendicular to the movement. Moving charges need to create magnetic fields that cancel out this effect, so that it will not be possible to tell which observer is moving.
I maybe silly but can we make a magnetic field from a stationary charge, observed with a moving observer. Due to relativity from the observer's perspective the charge is moving and hence has a magnetic field? correct me if I am wrong.
this video is great. detailed information. that is what learning people need. especially those who are doing it on there own. with no instructor to ask. you can only get so much from books. the animation helps you realise what you think is being told. some people may need this to understand what is being said. thank you for all the effort put in to the making of these videos. they really help me. I am self taught from reading and videos like these. thanks again.
Yes, what you wrote is correct. I stated in the video that all the electrons are already present in the wires, even without a battery or other source of voltage. The voltage just provides a force to the electrons, to push them along.
I am just amazed at this video. It is simple yet it explains concepts that I had been confused about for the longest time. OMG, you have hit a home run here. Thank you Mr. Khutoryansky!!!
I thought this sounded like a Sega style song. It's a good track and kind of funny that the precursor videos had classical music with this video coming along and casually adding Sonic midi tracks in with the greats of Bach of Beethoven.
Displaying those waves with a chain reaction of circular arrows is novel and clever 👍 I was looking for that animation of yours just to explain it to kids that had trouble to interpret those common sin and cos graphs. They understood it thanks to your explanation 💪🧠👍 Thank you so much for your videos and keep up that awesome work!!!
This video accomplished more than the last 20 videos I’ve spent hours watching, trying to just understand al these concepts and how they correlate. Thank you!
The chemical reaction inside the battery involves the creation of ions. However, the electrons that move through the wires are present inside the wires even without any battery connected. The battery creates a voltage because the two different metals of the two terminals hold on to their electrons with different strength. The ions need to be generated inside the battery so that they can migrate from one side of the battery to the other, to keep the terminals electrically neutral.
Can you please explain what is the speed of an electron at rest or in the motion (at applied electric field),and speed in a wire, material with change in energy, temperature,electric field
Think of the magnetic field around a wire carrying a constant DC current. Now insert a capacitor in the wire, so that the charge on the capacitor continues to increase as the current continues to flow. The magnetic field around the capacitor is the same is before, but now there are no charged particles flowing in the area between the two capacitor plates. Therefore, the only thing that can be responsible for the magnetic field is the increasing electric field between the two capacitor plates.
+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky Use music that has a rythm but no abrupt jazzy fluctuations. It should have a mild and pleasant presence like the pattering of rain when you're reading a book.
The video was very informative, but I agree with the fact that the music does not enhance the experience. Please keep the videos coming, (perhaps the music could be an optional addition). Thank you.
The electrons need a path to return to where they started, so that they can flow continuously in a loop. Otherwise, they will all pile up in one area, as was shown 2 minutes and 40 seconds into the video. Since particles with the same charge repel one another, these electrons, which have nowhere to go, will repel any new electrons from coming. Hence all the current flow will stop.
I'm sure You are joking about what is shown at 2:40. After the lamp burns out, the electrons naturally stay where they are. They no longer see any tension that could drive them. But above all, they have no desire to stay tightly crowded on the right. And where are the electrons in the upper part of the conductor? This line part would now have to be freshly flooded with electrons from the battery when the current was switched on. Drift speed of the electrons 0.7 mm / sec .... >>> more than 15 minutes to light up the lamps with only one meter of cable length. Your videos are really so outstanding that I want to apologize for my ironic tone.
Amazing Video, I learned a lot and theres so much more to learn, I already learnd the concept of electric field and has yet to learn the magnetic field and electromagnetic wave, ive kinda understand a little bit from the last but I am very fascinated. Thank you soo much for teaching us.
Light is an electromagnetic wave in the sense that light consists of oscillating electric and magnetic fields moving through space. The changing electric fields are creating the magnetic fields, and the changing magnetic fields are creating the electric fields.
After watching all your videos to date, I tried to find another physics channel I could get into, but I quickly realized that they all pale in comparison with yours. So I came back to your first video, and it's just as awesome as it was the first time I watched it.
I was one of your first subscribers, when your first vid had only a few hundred views or something. I thought you'd be bigger by now, this stuff is brilliantly educative.
Wow I am impressed!!!!! Now I understand everything! I won't lie but even if I see lectures of MIT professors ,they don't appeal me cause they are very long and I start to get bored but in this short video is everything that someone needed to know . please continue making more videos on physics. Thank u so much.this video was very very useful!!!❤
Do most people listen to music when they try to focus and learn something that is cognitive? The voice over, concept and the animation are put together well, but to be honest, the music is very unprofessional. Think about all the best science documentaries you've seen. Do they have dance music playing in the background fight for the viewers attention with the voice-over AND the graphics? It appears you think the subject matter is boring, so you have to add life to it with this 90s disco music. Let the subject shine on its own.
I have an identical copy of this video on my channel, with the music removed. Virtually no one watches that version. Many people complain about the music, but when it comes down to it, the version with the music is the version that most people end up watching, and which is therefore popular in the UA-cam search engine.
Hmmm...so the BBC, Disney (in the 40s and 50s), the Discovery Channel and many countless others, today and through the past, all these professional learning and documentary producers - they're all wrong?
surearrow Hey next time you watch a documentary....one that was made in the 21st century please, listen well, and you'll find background music!!! I dare you to give me ONE, good one, that doesn't have background music. Maybe this was true back in the 50s, but come on, times have changed!!!
Maybe I need to clarify. TO ME, the background "music" in this video was distracting - like an ugly, grotesque frame around a beautiful painting. Music is fine, frames are fine, but I'm here to experience the art within, and if the music or the frame adds to that - wonderful.
+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky I would watch it. I hate the music distraction. It seems as though you are trying to make the video more entertain because the topic isn't entertaining enough....
It seems that the complainers don't read the other comments otherwise they would quickly see they are outvoted by fans and would maybe STFU. Or just go somethwere else. That would work too. But the rest of us like what EK is doing here. We're quite satisfied with his methods.
THIS IS THE FUNNIEST AND MOST HELPFUL VIDEO I HAVE EVER SEEN. IT'S 242 AM AND I'M CRY LAUGHING ABOUT ALL OF THIS WHILE FEELING SO MUCH BETTER ABOUT MY FINAL TOMORROW THANK YOU EUGENE KHUTORYANSKY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
QUESTION: At 3:05 you say ”more batteries (in series) will give more voltage. And this will cause more current to flow.” To go back to the rock/mountain analogy. That is like saying if you increase the height of the mountain more rocks will fall.
If you push one rock of the mountain and it takes ten seconds to land, then there would be ten rocks in the air. If you go to a higher mountain where it takes thirty seconds for the rock to fall, there would be thirty rocks in the air!
It's cause charged particles are different from non charged particles . He used it to explain the energy force . Increasing voltage means the circuit will produce more force ...... and this happens when more current flows . Like how the force of the rock increases if the height increases . The height increase doesn't mean more rocks will fall . It determines the force .
I try to show this to everyone I know, even if they didn't ask. I think I understand a tiny fraction of what Galileo felt trying to convince people about Jupiter's moons! Amazing video!!!
Would u pl explain how the changing electric field creates a magnetic field ?where this iconic conversion secret lies ? Why electric field and magnetic field has a phase difference of 90 degrees?
@@savagegirl6318 they don't, they're in-phase. This explanation is not correct. They propagate together, two parts to one thing the electromagnetic field. (like if you throw a coin, heads and tails move together in phase.)
Question, can two or more waves like Light and Radio occupy the exact same point in space? or are they just ever so slightly in different spots in space?
Please take my answer with a grain of salt because I'm also just trying to understand EM waves so I'm not confident :) My understanding is that EM waves aren't individual masses and therefore can't occupy space in the same way as mass do. Rather it's just one field that encompass the entirety of space-time, and EM waves are disturbances im that field. Imagine something like wind. When two wind of different directions/velocities meet, they don't pass thru each other, they "combine" to form another wind with a different velocity/direction. But instead of mechanical waves like pressure disturbances in wind, EM waves are disturbances in the force (heh). Maxwell's equation defines how the waves interact with one another. But in order to bring the combined waves back to the individual waves that formed it and therefore make it useful, we can use Fourier Transform. 3Blue1Brown had a very visual approach on both topics, I suggest watching his videos as well. Also, if anyone out there more qualified is actually reading my comment, please correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks :)
@EugeneKhuthoryansky your explanations are on another level of intuitiveness. I've been on here for +12yrs and this easily is one of the most valuable channels on UA-cam.
My experience says :all Russian books(with special ref to MIR publications) and the videos by Eugene Khutoryansky well explain the basics without complicated formulas. The narrators voice is simply superb. I love all your video presentations.Well explained to a layman.
Its amazing how you can show so easily what takes youmore than 3 hours to read out of a textbook, and still get the big picture. Professors and universities make learning so cumbersome by complicating things as they go, before explaining all the concepts. If only theyd focus more on the fundamentals. I for one remember and retain things much better when I understand them at their most basic level. After that complicated things can be broken down in chunks, and more easily digested.
No, the battery does not create the charged particles. However, moving the charged particles requires energy, and there is a limited amount of energy stored in the battery. This is what the amp-hours of a battery is referring to.
Very good, although I don't like the misleading graphics that suggest all the electrons carry on moving as if nothing has happened when a circuit is broken and all pile up at the broken end of the wire. The mutual electrostatic repulsion that gets them moving almost simultaneously in the first place also stops them almost instantaneously. It would be lovely to see this dynamic braking, where the break in the circuit causes a momentarily higher concentration of electrons at the break, causing a backwards force on the electrons and stops the rest all piling in.
To see subtitles in other languages: Click on the gear symbol under the video, then click on "subtitles." Then select the language (You may need to scroll up and down to see all the languages available).
--To change subtitle appearance: Scroll to the top of the language selection window and click "options." In the options window you can, for example, choose a different font color and background color, and set the "background opacity" to 100% to help make the subtitles more readable.
--To turn the subtitles "on" or "off" altogether: Click the "CC" button under the video.
--If you believe that the translation in the subtitles can be improved, please send me an email.
THOSE ARE AMAZING VIDEOS i don't know how you don't have more than 10M subs :(
Could you make a video on EMI? or Ionizing Radiation effects on electrical circuits ?
@@atrophysicist These videos are good now，but there may be better ones in the future
isme to gear symbol nhi h
What song did you use for this video
Physics repels,
Physics attracts,
But most importantly,
Physics has Sonic songs as backing tracks.
Loved it!
This is such an underrated comment! Thanks, you made my day ;)
UNDERSTANDING TIME (AND TIME DILATION) PURSUANT TO THE BALANCED, THEORETICAL, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL PROOF THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA (OF NECESSITY):
Stellar clustering ALSO proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy, AS E=MC2 is clearly F=ma IN BALANCE !!! This explains the fourth dimension AND the term c4 (from Einstein's field equations). Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE; AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Accordingly, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. So, it makes perfect sense that the planets will move away from WHAT IS THE SUN very, very, very SLIGHTLY. Carefully consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE !!! (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. (Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS clearly F=ma IN BALANCE.) Carefully consider what is the speed of light (c). A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light (c); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS clearly F=ma ON BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky !!! Indeed, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Carefully consider what is THE EARTH/ground AND what is THE EYE ON BALANCE !!! The sky is BLUE, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. THE EARTH is a BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE form in relation to the speed of light (c) AND what is THE SUN (AS what is a linked AND BALANCED opposite) pursuant to the universal (and CLEAR) fact that E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=MC2 IS clearly proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE. Carefully consider what is THE EARTH/ground !!! Great. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Accordingly, objects (AND WHAT IS the falling MAN) fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE. Gravity is clearly ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy, AS E=MC2 is clearly F=ma IN BALANCE !!! It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense, AS BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 is clearly F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE !!! (Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental.) I have mathematically unified physics/physical experience, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE !!! GREAT !!! ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!!
By Frank DiMeglio
Im here for the music
Batteries have both positive and negative charges in equal amounts. They are therefore electrically neutral, and this is not the reason batteries create a voltage. The reason is because the two terminals are made out of different metals, which attract electrons with different strength. Inside the battery, the two metals are connected through a salt bridge, which allows electrically charged ions to flow, keeping both terminals electrically neutral as they chemically interact with these ions.
Nice explanation:3
If the battery is neutral, where is it getting the extra energy to create a current flow?
And surely the metal terminals have way more resistance than the atoms themselves so any available charges would flow from atom to atom and short out due to there being both positive and negative charge in the same place! And opposites attract! So technically, the battery should not work but we know that it does! So something is wrong with your explanation!
@@PeterMilanovski I think part of what makes it work is the physical separation of the different chemicals inside the battery across a gradient, which creates the potential energy to induce the flow of charged particles through the wire outside the battery, since it's a redox reaction and the electrons need some way to travel across the gradient to release the potential energy of the system. The wire is the path of least resistance for that to occur, so the current travels through the wire instead of through the battery itself. Also, I think electrically neutral means something different than 'no potential energy available'.
A box full of an equal quantity of positively and negatively charged particles that have been separated by a barrier has potential energy because the particles are trying to move back towards each other. The entire box as a whole has a net charge of zero, but the individual charges themselves still have potential energy to move.
@@icarus313 yes, what you are saying is what is being taught in school but it's not the only way to look at it! Let's take a look at another form of energy storage, let's take a hydroelectric power station. What we have is a dam of water as a means of energy storage, there's water on both sides of the dam wall! The only difference between the two water's is the difference in potential, it's not that the water on one side is positively charged and negative on the other! How would that work if in fact that were the true case? What would happen if the two water's should come in contact with each other? But we both know that this isn't the case with water, it's the same no matter where it is. The idea that there's a positive charge and a negative charge is wrong! The person who coined the term positive and negative didn't mean that there are two charges of opposite polarity! He actually meant that you have to understand it as credit and debit! When he said plus and minus, he ment that one side is in credit of electons while the other side is in debit, as in negative! It was George Washington himself that coined those terms and everyone else misunderstood it. Every time you see the plus and minus signs, look at it as if it's all the same charge but in a difference of potential! This is the original and true theory as discovered by George Washington and the theory works perfectly, you can use the one that everyone is using today but it only goes so far until things don't make sense, whereas the original theory can be applied to explain anything!
If you haven't already read anything from Benjamin Franklin and his experiments with electricity and lightning, then you are missing out big time! But the catch is, pay close attention to his description of what is happening with electricity and try to look at it with fresh eyes! Otherwise you just might miss it just like everyone else has.
Now that that's out of the way, let's go back to the hydroelectric power station! We have a serious problem here! While we know that water has an electric charge, it's not where we derive our electricity from, you might say that the only reason why we use the water to begin with is because it naturally falls on higher land and due to the other great unknown that we call gravity, it wants to flow to the lowest point where it can equalise itself in relation to the other water. So the electricity must be coming from somewhere inside the generator! But where? Is it coming from the magnet? If so, why hasn't the magnet run out of electricity? Or maybe the electricity is already in the copper coils and is only being moved back and forth by the magnet? Or maybe as the magnet passed the coil if copper, it pushed the electricity out of the way and more electricity is pulled out of the atmosphere (think of how a switch mode power supply works by creating a magnetic field around an inductor in one direction but by switching the direction and applying more electricity, you get the combined voltages to double at the output at the expense of current at the input! That's fair enough, but we are powering a complete city with electricity and it has to come from somewhere! Energy can't be created nor destroyed so that means that it can only come from somewhere else! So does that mean that the magnet is actually making electricity out of nothing? The electric charge has to exist somewhere for the humble generator to take it and send it to you! But the ultimate question still remains, where? There's no answer to this question so far, we know that a generator works and we know that if we move a magnet across a coil of wire it will produce a current, but where did the current come from to begin with and does it go back to where it originated from to equalise itself just like the water from the mountain to the sea?
If you can answer this question, then you will be the smartest person to ever walk the earth 🌎. This is what I'm working on...
@@PeterMilanovski you should study about the topic in the chapter of electrochemistry of class 12th😂
Everyone, if you enjoyed this video, you can help more people find it in their UA-cam Searches by clicking the like button under the video and writing a comment. Links to some of my other physics videos are available at the end of the video up above at 11:22. Thanks.
Eugene Khutoryansky please remove the background music
it is very irritating
Eugene Khutoryansky nice job brother! you should teach in out reach programs with all these visuals. I'm sure it will be a hit.
Another request if you may take one, can you make a video about PV devices? A similar video like this explaining the phenomenon will make it so much easier to understand.
Hope all is well!
+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky Great Video
Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky This video had Sonic the hedgehog music!
Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky vidios posted are very understand ing and helpful please carry on . thanks.
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
Eugene Khutoryansky understands it well enough, that's why this was explained so well and elegantly.
Very simple, yet powerful explanation.
Thank You
Thanks for the compliment.
THIS VIDEO WAS AMAZING!!! Holy crap you explained EVERYTHING. This deserves a noble prize!!!!
Thanks. It is nice to hear that you liked it that much.
that's what I was thinking about.. delivering information to people more important than discoverting it.. it gives a chance for upgrading the old legacy info
"Explained" absolutely nothing! The term Field is bandied about throughout..."Explain" a "Field"! Description is "Not" an explanation!
@@RHINO41153 We can describe it as a field like with gravity can be tought as bodies with mass attracting each other than curvature of space time. My point is that it's just an analogy to get our head around something than (taking the example of gravity) calculating the einstein field equation for calculating the orbit of earth, Newtonian gravity is a better for this. Same as for a field.
@@rektlzz7808 I stand by comment. From the very start you said "Describe", a description is not an explanation! A Field is not a thing in and of itself. The same goes for gravity, gravity is an effect. And as for Einstein, he has contributed absolutely nothing! If you want to use analogies gravity is just like a shadow, a shadow has no properties, it's an effect of the absence of light nothing more. Many things can be described, but that tells you nothing about what is going on, it's not an Explanation. Just like people using "a wave" as if it is a thing in and of itself, using it as if it is something traveling in a direction, such as away or towards something else...it is not!
For instance, say we are standing at the opposite sides of a pond of clear still calm water and I threw a rock into it, it would produce ripples, or waves, are they traveling? As in moving towards you or I, or anything else...NO! The water is merely oscillating up and down until it comes to rest after losing the energy of the rocks disturbance, same water molecules ending right where they started, that holds true for any type of wave, be it sound and even Light! Perturbations in a medium, nothing more, nothing less, nothing is traveling. Things can be described very easily, but try to explain what is really going on, that is why a "description is Not an explanation!
I'm sure I hit a nerve in the mention of Einstein, but every one of his theories have no merit when it comes to Physics and have been debunked numerous times. Einsteins Space/Time is absolutely absurd and ludicrous! As if you can bend Space and Time which are not 'Things'...they have No Properties, and cannot be Quantified. And as to Light, Light has No Speed, and nothing Emits Light such as a Photon...which by "Definition" is a "Virtual Particle" with no Mass! Anyone who believes that Light is being emitted from, and I don't care what the source, be it a candle, a Light bulb or the Sun needs to rethink it...how can light from a candle and light from the Sun travel at the exact same speed, they can't given the so called light particle the photon. It is a rate of induction by way of perturbation in a medium, same as my analogy of a wave in a pond, a wave is what something does, not what it is!
So as to "a Field", a Field has no properties, none! It's where things are observed and take place, and then described.
I'm writing this reply on my phone which is difficult, otherwise, if I was on a computer I would have probably done a better job in my wording. You can respond, or Not. I'm pretty sure I know your model of the universe, it's the bumping particles universe of mainstream...and I once thought that way, until there were too many things that didn't make sense and have taken on a completely different model, much simpler but not simplex. There are many physicists in the mainstream that share this model but not willing to speak up because their very livelihoods and careers would be on the line.
Over ten years later, and this video remains a classic educational tool! Even I would've been able to understand these concepts back in the day. 😉
except it is not voltage that kills
@@jyvben1520 Yeah, that's true.
Don't believe it can be used alone to understand these concepts but it can give you a bigger picture and help reference things you already learned
@@Snoo29293 That's very true! To fully understand how electricity and magnetism work, it's necessary to know the equations behind them.
It's similar to general relativity: an analogy like geodesics is a useful visual tool, but it never tells the full story. Knowledge of Einstein's field equations is required to truly understand what's going on.
You can help translate this video by adding subtitles in other languages. To add a translation, click on the following link:
ua-cam.com/users/timedtext_video?v=XiHVe8U5PhU&ref=share
You will then be able to add translations for all the subtitles. You will also be able to provide a translation for the title of the video. Please remember to hit the submit button for both the title and for the subtitles, as they are submitted separately.
Details about adding translations is available at
support.google.com/youtube/answer/6054623?hl=en
Thanks.
если свет это эм волны то почему он не влияет на метелл и не создаёт в нём ток как радиоволны?
My God this video is INCREDIBLE. Its so simple yet so complete!!! Also, i loved sonic the hedgehog theme
Glad you liked my video. Thanks.
I almost instantly noticed too. A remix of Scrap Brain, from Sonic The Hedgehog.
You did a good job Eugene. The repetitions during the video are a very useful tool. It refreshes the information. Thanks a lot
Look at it from Einstein's Theory of Relativity: Each charged particle can believe that it is standing still, and not creating a magnetic field. An observer who thinks the charge is moving will see the charge as shorter and having a higher charge density, and therefore having a stronger electric field in the direction perpendicular to the movement. Moving charges need to create magnetic fields that cancel out this effect, so that it will not be possible to tell which observer is moving.
I maybe silly but can we make a magnetic field from a stationary charge, observed with a moving observer. Due to relativity from the observer's perspective the charge is moving and hence has a magnetic field?
correct me if I am wrong.
@@kavinbharathi Yes! I think that's what Derek Muller from Veritasium was referring to in this video here:
ua-cam.com/video/1TKSfAkWWN0/v-deo.html
@@icarus313 That was really helpful. Thank you for linking the video too.
Wow... electrostatics, electrodynamics and magnetism explained simply in 10 minutes- spent almost 4 months in a class learning this. LOL
Within electro music haha.
Can you justify the use of LOL here??? btw lol!!
And you think it easy because you already learned it. After studying we can grasp it by watching these animations
@@umairm.5662 yep u have a point there haha
The truth is that I found it less boring with music good job Eugene
at first i was like "seriously?" but then i started jamming to it.
This channel deserves 100 times more subscribers than it has
Thanks.
Yes, that is correct. I use always used blue balls to represent negative charges, and I always used red balls to represent positive charges.
I am glad you liked my explanations. Thanks.
I wish I knew as much about electricity as I did old video games. The music is space harrier and scrap brain zone from sonic 1
Great video! And the music makes me want to bust out my old Sega and defeat Dr. Robotnik!
DAAAAAYUUUM !!! I spent six months looking for something awesome like this !
I am glad you liked my video that much. Thanks.
this video is great. detailed information. that is what learning people need. especially those who are doing it on there own. with no instructor to ask. you can only get so much from books. the animation helps you realise what you think is being told. some people may need this to understand what is being said. thank you for all the effort put in to the making of these videos. they really help me. I am self taught from reading and videos like these. thanks again.
It can't be possible, you've explained it better than my university professors, pretty much better! I'm beginning to love you!
+shannon, thanks. I am glad you liked it. I also have lots of other videos on this topic.
if only more people like you would take this kind of intuitive approach
Thanks. I am glad to hear that you liked it that much.
3:42 I really like the sonic the hedgehog music lol. thank you for the upload
Thanks. I am glad you liked it.
Yes, what you wrote is correct. I stated in the video that all the electrons are already present in the wires, even without a battery or other source of voltage. The voltage just provides a force to the electrons, to push them along.
Very good explanation
This video made my jaw drop, I never had any real concept/idea or image of an EM wave, THANK YOU!
I am just amazed at this video. It is simple yet it explains concepts that I had been confused about for the longest time. OMG, you have hit a home run here. Thank you Mr. Khutoryansky!!!
Why are you using Sonic the Hedgehog songs for the background music?
Why not really
Scrap Brain Zone :D
cause we...
Gotta go Fast~!
-Sanic
I thought this sounded like a Sega style song.
It's a good track and kind of funny that the precursor videos had classical music with this video coming along and casually adding Sonic midi tracks in with the greats of Bach of Beethoven.
Isn't this the Space Harrier theme?
Thanks for the feedback. It is great to hear that my video was helpful.
Simple graphics, simple words, simple animations, interval between statements & classic video game sound makes this video perfect for education .
Thank you for making these videos! These are so wonderful, I can't believe they exist.
Thanks for the compliment. I am glad you like my videos.
Displaying those waves with a chain reaction of circular arrows is novel and clever 👍
I was looking for that animation of yours just to explain it to kids that had trouble to interpret those common sin and cos graphs.
They understood it thanks to your explanation
💪🧠👍
Thank you so much for your videos and keep up that awesome work!!!
Thanks. I am glad my video was helpful.
This video accomplished more than the last 20 videos I’ve spent hours watching, trying to just understand al these concepts and how they correlate.
Thank you!
I am glad my video was helpful.
10 minutes video is more useful than hours of self-study or college study the same material... thanks
The chemical reaction inside the battery involves the creation of ions. However, the electrons that move through the wires are present inside the wires even without any battery connected. The battery creates a voltage because the two different metals of the two terminals hold on to their electrons with different strength. The ions need to be generated inside the battery so that they can migrate from one side of the battery to the other, to keep the terminals electrically neutral.
Can you please explain what is the speed of an electron at rest or in the motion (at applied electric field),and speed in a wire, material with change in energy, temperature,electric field
sonic the hedghog music exelent
I knew that music was from sonic!
Not Sonic but Space Harrier. Agree it was excellent. :)
Very informative, difficult thing made easy to understand.
Think of the magnetic field around a wire carrying a constant DC current. Now insert a capacitor in the wire, so that the charge on the capacitor continues to increase as the current continues to flow. The magnetic field around the capacitor is the same is before, but now there are no charged particles flowing in the area between the two capacitor plates. Therefore, the only thing that can be responsible for the magnetic field is the increasing electric field between the two capacitor plates.
Here is some constructive criticism; the music is very distracting.
+IbanezV70CE, I have another version of this video on my channel without any music. Almost no one watches that version.
+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky
Use music that has a rythm but no abrupt jazzy fluctuations.
It should have a mild and pleasant presence like the pattering of rain when you're reading a book.
+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky can u send me the link for that video without music.
+Shazia Malik, the version of this video without the music is at ua-cam.com/video/EzVEDdRjgXU/v-deo.html
The video was very informative, but I agree with the fact that the music does not enhance the experience. Please keep the videos coming, (perhaps the music could be an optional addition). Thank you.
R.I.P for the person who fell a huge rock to his/her head 😭🤣
this is wonderful. back when uploaders had standards for high quality content.
Thanks.
Да уж, дружара, мало того что на пальцах объяснил сложнейшую тему, так ещё и мультипликатор прекраснейший.
Спасибо за труды.
Excellent video thank you!
+yellow6ird, thanks. Glad you liked it.
One thing I learned from this "AC current" really means "Alternating Current-current".
Electricians love redundancy
The electrons need a path to return to where they started, so that they can flow continuously in a loop. Otherwise, they will all pile up in one area, as was shown 2 minutes and 40 seconds into the video. Since particles with the same charge repel one another, these electrons, which have nowhere to go, will repel any new electrons from coming. Hence all the current flow will stop.
I'm sure You are joking about what is shown at 2:40. After the lamp burns out, the electrons naturally stay where they are. They no longer see any tension that could drive them. But above all, they have no desire to stay tightly crowded on the right. And where are the electrons in the upper part of the conductor? This line part would now have to be freshly flooded with electrons from the battery when the current was switched on. Drift speed of the electrons 0.7 mm / sec .... >>> more than 15 minutes to light up the lamps with only one meter of cable length.
Your videos are really so outstanding that I want to apologize for my ironic tone.
Thanks. Yes, it is nice to hear that. I am glad it was helpful.
Amazing Video, I learned a lot and theres so much more to learn, I already learnd the concept of electric field and has yet to learn the magnetic field and electromagnetic wave, ive kinda understand a little bit from the last but I am very fascinated. Thank you soo much for teaching us.
Light is an electromagnetic wave in the sense that light consists of oscillating electric and magnetic fields moving through space. The changing electric fields are creating the magnetic fields, and the changing magnetic fields are creating the electric fields.
After watching all your videos to date, I tried to find another physics channel I could get into, but I quickly realized that they all pale in comparison with yours. So I came back to your first video, and it's just as awesome as it was the first time I watched it.
+Sean Wiesen, thanks for the compliment about my channel and my videos.
Another nicely done video Eugene. I'm indifferent to the music. Your video, you pick the tunes. You keep on being you !
I was one of your first subscribers, when your first vid had only a few hundred views or something. I thought you'd be bigger by now, this stuff is brilliantly educative.
The music put me in a trance
A kind word for the brave illustrative figure who was willing to stand under the falling rocks - for science.
I love the music and I’m about to binge every electrical video. This is truly great content
Thanks!
Awesome video. Cleared doubts held for ages, in few minutes,
Piyush Saklani Glad I was able to help. And thanks for the compliment on the video.
absolutely amazing
dude you really need to make an album for the sweet background music
Thanks for the compliment. I am glad you liked my explanations.
I hope you are ultra fat, because you're worth your weight in gold my friend!!! Awesome videos!
+1 for sexy girls at the end.
Science videos + Sonic music is perfect for me.
Wow I am impressed!!!!! Now I understand everything! I won't lie but even if I see lectures of MIT professors ,they don't appeal me cause they are very long and I start to get bored but in this short video is everything that someone needed to know . please continue making more videos on physics. Thank u so much.this video was very very useful!!!❤
This is good but would be a lot better without the annoying music, I cant focus on what you are saying
I have another version of this video without any music. Almost no one watches that version.
Do most people listen to music when they try to focus and learn something that is cognitive? The voice over, concept and the animation are put together well, but to be honest, the music is very unprofessional. Think about all the best science documentaries you've seen. Do they have dance music playing in the background fight for the viewers attention with the voice-over AND the graphics? It appears you think the subject matter is boring, so you have to add life to it with this 90s disco music. Let the subject shine on its own.
I have an identical copy of this video on my channel, with the music removed. Virtually no one watches that version. Many people complain about the music, but when it comes down to it, the version with the music is the version that most people end up watching, and which is therefore popular in the UA-cam search engine.
Hmmm...so the BBC, Disney (in the 40s and 50s), the Discovery Channel and many countless others, today and through the past, all these professional learning and documentary producers - they're all wrong?
Music of that sort (entertainment and/or propaganda) is to draw targeted emotions from the viewer, not cognitive, critical thinking.
surearrow Hey next time you watch a documentary....one that was made in the 21st century please, listen well, and you'll find background music!!! I dare you to give me ONE, good one, that doesn't have background music. Maybe this was true back in the 50s, but come on, times have changed!!!
Maybe I need to clarify. TO ME, the background "music" in this video was distracting - like an ugly, grotesque frame around a beautiful painting. Music is fine, frames are fine, but I'm here to experience the art within, and if the music or the frame adds to that - wonderful.
Sonic theme was icing on my enlightenment cake
i watched that video and then all of a sudden at the 4th minute that music triggered instant nostalgia. Is that the music from sonic1 on megadrive ?
Nice concept! Bad music***
please remove dat bckground music
+Vrushal Naik, I have another version of this video on my channel with the music removed. Almost no one watches that version.
+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky There are many soothing appropriate sounds out there. This music choice is really irritating.
+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky I would watch it. I hate the music distraction. It seems as though you are trying to make the video more entertain because the topic isn't entertaining enough....
The background sound is good. If 100 not like it then millions like it.....
and this is how how you teach science. Really sir hats off. This should be the textbook of evry school
Thanks.
I love these Videos. They are so simple to Understand. Better than High School
I hate how I only discovered your videos the night before my exam :(
It seems that the complainers don't read the other comments otherwise they would quickly see they are outvoted by fans and would maybe STFU. Or just go somethwere else. That would work too. But the rest of us like what EK is doing here. We're quite satisfied with his methods.
The sound effects of that poor guy gettin' hit in the head with all that stuff are killin' me! rofl!
It's nice to see my entire phys 222 class condensed into a video which lasts less than 12 minutes!
Thanks.
THIS IS THE FUNNIEST AND MOST HELPFUL VIDEO I HAVE EVER SEEN. IT'S 242 AM AND I'M CRY LAUGHING ABOUT ALL OF THIS WHILE FEELING SO MUCH BETTER ABOUT MY FINAL TOMORROW THANK YOU EUGENE KHUTORYANSKY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Glad to hear that my video was helpful. Good luck on your final.
Saw this channel's name on crash course ... really worth it !
thanks for making this! your understanding and explanation are great! by the way, the theme of this video animation reminds me of 90's video game :P
Thanks.
QUESTION:
At 3:05 you say ”more batteries (in series) will give more voltage. And this will cause more current to flow.” To go back to the rock/mountain analogy. That is like saying if you increase the height of the mountain more rocks will fall.
If you push one rock of the mountain and it takes ten seconds to land, then there would be ten rocks in the air. If you go to a higher mountain where it takes thirty seconds for the rock to fall, there would be thirty rocks in the air!
It's cause charged particles are different from non charged particles . He used it to explain the energy force . Increasing voltage means the circuit will produce more force ...... and this happens when more current flows . Like how the force of the rock increases if the height increases . The height increase doesn't mean more rocks will fall . It determines the force .
@@davepook6031 If we push one rock *per second then you're right...I like your analogy :)
This has got to be the best video on UA-cam the music from a video game with important information
I try to show this to everyone I know, even if they didn't ask. I think I understand a tiny fraction of what Galileo felt trying to convince people about Jupiter's moons! Amazing video!!!
Thanks. I am glad that you liked my video that much.
This is because a constant magnetic field will not create an electric field, but a changing magnetic field will create an electric field.
Would u pl explain how the changing electric field creates a magnetic field ?where this iconic conversion secret lies ? Why electric field and magnetic field has a phase difference of 90 degrees?
@@savagegirl6318 they don't, they're in-phase. This explanation is not correct. They propagate together, two parts to one thing the electromagnetic field. (like if you throw a coin, heads and tails move together in phase.)
mind blowing job. You are great
this is very nostalgic for me because i used to play flash games when i was very young that had the same or similar sound effects
Love the video, the MarioKart playlist is crazy
Question, can two or more waves like Light and Radio occupy the exact same point in space? or are they just ever so slightly in different spots in space?
Please take my answer with a grain of salt because I'm also just trying to understand EM waves so I'm not confident :)
My understanding is that EM waves aren't individual masses and therefore can't occupy space in the same way as mass do. Rather it's just one field that encompass the entirety of space-time, and EM waves are disturbances im that field.
Imagine something like wind. When two wind of different directions/velocities meet, they don't pass thru each other, they "combine" to form another wind with a different velocity/direction. But instead of mechanical waves like pressure disturbances in wind, EM waves are disturbances in the force (heh).
Maxwell's equation defines how the waves interact with one another. But in order to bring the combined waves back to the individual waves that formed it and therefore make it useful, we can use Fourier Transform. 3Blue1Brown had a very visual approach on both topics, I suggest watching his videos as well.
Also, if anyone out there more qualified is actually reading my comment, please correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks :)
An excellent video covering all basics of ELECTROMAGNETISM.
Highly recommended.
@EugeneKhuthoryansky your explanations are on another level of intuitiveness. I've been on here for +12yrs and this easily is one of the most valuable channels on UA-cam.
Thanks for the compliments.
Thanks for awesome video l am now understand these 😃👌👏👍
Thanks for offering people a chance at an intuitive understanding of physics
Thanks.
I learned more from this video than a month of lectures at my school!
I am glad my video was helpful. Thanks.
What an excellent video.
This is the next generation teaching .
Thanks for the compliment.
My experience says :all Russian books(with special ref to MIR publications) and the videos by Eugene Khutoryansky well explain the basics without complicated formulas.
The narrators voice is simply superb. I love all your video presentations.Well explained to a layman.
Its amazing how you can show so easily what takes youmore than 3 hours to read out of a textbook, and still get the big picture. Professors and universities make learning so cumbersome by complicating things as they go, before explaining all the concepts. If only theyd focus more on the fundamentals. I for one remember and retain things much better when I understand them at their most basic level. After that complicated things can be broken down in chunks, and more easily digested.
Thanks.
No, the battery does not create the charged particles. However, moving the charged particles requires energy, and there is a limited amount of energy stored in the battery. This is what the amp-hours of a battery is referring to.
Very good, although I don't like the misleading graphics that suggest all the electrons carry on moving as if nothing has happened when a circuit is broken and all pile up at the broken end of the wire. The mutual electrostatic repulsion that gets them moving almost simultaneously in the first place also stops them almost instantaneously. It would be lovely to see this dynamic braking, where the break in the circuit causes a momentarily higher concentration of electrons at the break, causing a backwards force on the electrons and stops the rest all piling in.
I cover that fact, and animate it, in my video on electric circuits at the following link.
ua-cam.com/video/m4jzgqZu-4s/v-deo.html
Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky very very very great Jobe sir,animations makes it easy to understand
Wow awesome science with classic nintento music, love it !!
Thanks. Though, this is classic Sega music, not Nintendo.
AYE THE SONIC MUSIC I AM FLIPPING OUT RIGHTNOW
These videos should be standard for all kids from 7 years tow 12 years old
Your 3d explanation is so nice and clear and simple as well