Mr. Justice (Retd.) S. Nagamuthu, Topic: Principles of Judicial Evidence - Part 2
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 чер 2019
- Friday Group:
Topic: Principles of Judicial Evidence - Part 2
Speaker: Mr. Justice (Retd.) S. Nagamuthu, Sr. Advocate. Supreme Court of India
Organizer : G.Seshagiri Rao, Advocate Supreme Court of India.
Please subscribe to our channel Friday Group : / @fridaygroupseshagirirao
Great explaination sir, every words from precious to every lawyer
It's a great honour for me to be part of the Friday group, Supreme court of India
Sr.Lawyer Shri Nagamuthu Sir is Always Excellent. Thank you very much.
very good sir... Iam learning so much from this lecture... thanks to sheshu sir...
Hon'ble Sir really all lecture are excellent. Helpful to improve our knowldge.Thank you very much our Lordship.
I never found such a beautiful explanation. Thanks a lot sir for sharing your wonderful knowledge on the subject.
Just wonderful! Crystal clear
Wah.... What a simple way of explaining the tough sections... Great Sir.. Always grateful... To justice Nagamuttu Sir.
Thanks a lot Seshagiri sir for putting these lectures on you tube channel,so that other people can access.
Thank you Nagamuthu sir. The concepts were explained in such a lucid manner by giving examples,which are easy to understand and remember. A humble request to sir, of he can conduct online lectures on Evidence, IPC ,CrPC .
A humble request to the channel to upload other videos as well.
The Best One to Ample Clear
Wonderful lecture sir which is very useful for upcoming Advocate and all our legal fatarnity
Thanks to our eminent jurist
Very good learning form a very learned judge
Most enlightening! Kindly speak also on why Uttar Pradesh which tops in the State list of having maximum number of pending cases and here too it is West UP which owes for more than half of the total number of pending cases and still Centre does not want to create even a single HC Bench in any nook and corner of Uttar Pradesh except at Lucknow also known as the Nawab City way back in 1948 and what is worst is that the litigants of West UP comprising of 30 districts have been attached not with Lucknow which is 230 km earlier but right uptill Allahabad to seek justice which is nothing but stupidity of the highest order! Why Maharashtra which is the home state of incumbent CJI Dr Dhananjay Yashwant Chandrachud which tops in the latest justice index ranking list and where women are totally safe even in night all alone and still has maximum number of Benches and Bihar which is the home state of incumbent Chairman of Supreme Court Bar Association of India Mr Vikas Singh and which is notorious for lawlessness has not even a single HC Bench? Why Karnataka which is such a peaceful State and yet Centre created two more HC Benches for Gulbarga and Dharwad respectively for just four and eight districts in 2008 but for 30 districts of West UP not a single HC Bench created even though Justice Jaswant Singh Commission headed by former Supreme Court Judge recommended Bench at Agra in West UP yet not created till now? Why such blatant and worst discrimination is going on unhindered, unchecked and unaccounted for? Kindly speak on this also! My best wishes and best regards, Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate
What a fantastic lecture!!
Mastery on evidence act.Genious Sir.
Exllent lecture🙏🙏
thank you Sir for sharing beautiful knowledge acquired in your judicial journey...
Wonderful lectures sir thank you sir.
I understand today section 10 sir even after so many years of my completion of law .I don't have words but wana express my gratitude to u sir🙏
Wonderful session... Veryuseful 🙏thanx a lot Sir🙏
Brilliant teacher, thanks Sir. From Pakistan.
Really helpful to all the junior advocates.
Great man legend of India
Excellent session sir
Great lecture. An inspiration for us.
Q
Sir please conduct more meetings.its very helpful for us
Great session👍please carry on sir
GREAT LECTURE THANK YOU SIR!
It is very nice to understand
Your lectures are amazing. Please complete the lectures on evidence act.
What an excellent class
Jai🇮🇳Hind Sir.
Sir it was inspiration talk but let us argue in class
Superb lecture.
Excellent
Incredible
Nice
Super sir
Sir, if no evidence is added by prosecution during trial can we say the accused is prosecuted, if not then how presumption is possible.
🙏🙏🙏
Sir evidence act sec120 ?
Excellent session
Why the home state of incumbent Chairman of Supreme Court that is Bihar has not even a single HC Bench and why the most peaceful State like Maharashtra which tops in the latest justice index ranking list has maximum number of Benches and why Uttar Pradesh which tops in the maximum number of pending cases has just one Bench and that too so near to Allahabad at Lucknow and nowhere else and why the litigants of 30 districts of West UP have been attached not with Lucknow but with Allahabad which is 230 km away from Lucknow due to which litigants have to waste whole night and half day in just travelling alone from one side? Kindly speak on this? Why Centre in one go created two High Court Bench at Dharwad and Gulbarga respectively in Karnataka for just four and eight districts but for 30 districts of West UP Centre is not ready to create even a single HC Bench and this despite the irrefutable fact that it is West UP which owes for more than half of the total number of pending cases of UP? Kindly speak on this also! My best wishes and best regards, Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate
Confession is a direct admission of his guilt by a person who has committed a crime.
Sir I love idli☺️👌💐
Thank you Honourable Sir, the lecture is very very helpful to those who take the legal profession seriously 🙏🙏
My humble submission to Honourable justice that, as you mentioned the Section 112 IEA, and said that by DNA evidence an husband can prove non accessibility of his wife and can prevent the court from presuming that he is legitimate father of child
My humble submission is that, it is not totally correct. Because, DNA evidence will prove that whether he is biological father or not, that's all, It doesn't mean that he had no access with his wife, Hence by DNA evidence he cannot rebut the presumption of court that he is not legitimate father of the child.
I.e. biological father is different from legitimate father.
Unless he prove non accessibility with his during begotten period, he is legitimate father, though he is proved that he is not biological father by proving DNA evidence
I am Dy SP serving in Tamilnadu Police, It is my opinion with regard to Section 112 IEA
President of India Supreme authority can revoke authorization granted in favor of Supreme to deal with British colonial legislation judiciary anti India Indian rule of democratic standards and judicial accountability subject to control of preamble of constitution to serve people. Outcome of deliberations of actions and reactions of opinions of delegates of people representing parliament. People need abolition of colonialism judiciary Independency unbridled power unaccompanied by liability anti India disloyality and disaffection dealt with Supreme Court alien rules of laws not acceptable to people and government of India.
Excellent