Finally someone data mined the reports! This is awesome. I suspect what is happening is some sort of space warping going on. They are not traveling the speed of light, but they travel light years distance in a few seconds. There's no sonic boom or heating up for the same reason. This could explain why some are seen, but radar doesn't detect them. Space is warped around them, you see them close but not normally at a distance. Depending on the degree of warping. But then maybe I watched too much Star Trek.
I applaud the SCU in their effort to collate and analyze UAP data from these multiple reporting sources which have different data collection protocols and formats making for a difficult to impossible task. I would like to suggest that SCU undertake the creation of a 'best practices' data collection protocol and liaise with MUFON and similar organizations world wide in this process so that we can more robust data collection which will allow for more nuanced and detailed data analysis.
Re ~ 57:00 to ~ 1:08:00 discussing the "How?" I suggest that you search for "Light Pumping For An "Anti-Gravity" & Inertial Mass Reduction Effect" to find out. The answer is so completely within the "known laws of physics" as to be properly described as mundane. 👍🏻
Everyone so focused on the bright white spots but never what’s around those spots. In every pic or video, you can see cube shaped objects usually very subtle although in videos they can be seen sporadically circling the bright spot almost as if they are projecting the bright object. Which would explain a lot physics wise. These orbs and spheres (the bright spots) also can be seen with an opaque cube/hexagon/square at times if you watch these videos at an extremely slow playback and simply pause the playback every couple of seconds. You’ll see what I’m saying about both the bright spot and the smaller cubes anywhere in a 360 degree area around the bright spot. Hope you take this sincerely and re-examine a few of your videos to confirm.
I love these podcasts, but was quite disappointed at the amount of time spent on speculation, given that the study looked at so many well documented cases and found clear patterns.
Are there any physicists in the comments who can fact-check Powell’s statements? Specifically, his claim (around 1:03:00) that reducing the inertial mass of a space vehicle traveling at relativistic speeds would allow it to circumvent (or avoid) collisions in interstellar space. From my (non-physicist) understanding, at relativistic speeds, even a small particle’s impact could produce enough energy to vaporize parts of the spacecraft. Wouldn’t lowering the inertial mass primarily aid in maneuverability-helping the craft steer around particles-rather than directly avoiding collisions? Also, Powell mentioned that reducing inertial mass might allow a spacecraft to travel through a mountain. That seems counterintuitive, but I’d love to hear an expert’s take on whether and how that could work in principle. Thanks in advance.
All the investigations that have proved that these craft are at least capable of interstellar travel. And have been deemed as having a probability of near 100% of originating from another star system since the 1950”s. The reports must of been put in one of those old pneumatic capsules and conveyed into a river never to been looked at. Just like in that Simpson episode. Consensus in the USA won’t be reached until there is a craft sitting above every church, synagogue, mosque, temple, military base and football ground during the whole month of December. Until such an undeniable event all those in control of these places will continue preaching their same rhetoric maintaining the status quo.
With the amount of our air traffic cluttering. the sky at all hours of the day and knowing the effect a close encounter had with that Iranian fighter. These things must be making a concerted effort to keep at a safe distance from all our aircraft.
This is false. You just said these were in databases. I could have wrote a program in 10 minutes to analyze this, and he says it took two years? That can't be right, unless they're incompetent.
Hey Michael what is the assessment of the mess going on now?
Finally someone data mined the reports! This is awesome.
I suspect what is happening is some sort of space warping going on. They are not traveling the speed of light, but they travel light years distance in a few seconds. There's no sonic boom or heating up for the same reason. This could explain why some are seen, but radar doesn't detect them. Space is warped around them, you see them close but not normally at a distance. Depending on the degree of warping. But then maybe I watched too much Star Trek.
I applaud the SCU in their effort to collate and analyze UAP data from these multiple reporting sources which have different data collection protocols and formats making for a difficult to impossible task. I would like to suggest that SCU undertake the creation of a 'best practices' data collection protocol and liaise with MUFON and similar organizations world wide in this process so that we can more robust data collection which will allow for more nuanced and detailed data analysis.
Re ~ 57:00 to ~ 1:08:00 discussing the "How?"
I suggest that you search for "Light Pumping For An "Anti-Gravity" & Inertial Mass Reduction Effect" to find out.
The answer is so completely within the "known laws of physics" as to be properly described as mundane.
👍🏻
Everyone so focused on the bright white spots but never what’s around those spots. In every pic or video, you can see cube shaped objects usually very subtle although in videos they can be seen sporadically circling the bright spot almost as if they are projecting the bright object. Which would explain a lot physics wise. These orbs and spheres (the bright spots) also can be seen with an opaque cube/hexagon/square at times if you watch these videos at an extremely slow playback and simply pause the playback every couple of seconds. You’ll see what I’m saying about both the bright spot and the smaller cubes anywhere in a 360 degree area around the bright spot. Hope you take this sincerely and re-examine a few of your videos to confirm.
I would go a head and look at NUFORC's data anyway. Look at it in the same way, then compare the results. It should have similar results.
I love these podcasts, but was quite disappointed at the amount of time spent on speculation, given that the study looked at so many well documented cases and found clear patterns.
Are there any physicists in the comments who can fact-check Powell’s statements? Specifically, his claim (around 1:03:00) that reducing the inertial mass of a space vehicle traveling at relativistic speeds would allow it to circumvent (or avoid) collisions in interstellar space.
From my (non-physicist) understanding, at relativistic speeds, even a small particle’s impact could produce enough energy to vaporize parts of the spacecraft. Wouldn’t lowering the inertial mass primarily aid in maneuverability-helping the craft steer around particles-rather than directly avoiding collisions?
Also, Powell mentioned that reducing inertial mass might allow a spacecraft to travel through a mountain. That seems counterintuitive, but I’d love to hear an expert’s take on whether and how that could work in principle.
Thanks in advance.
All the investigations that have proved that these craft are at least capable of interstellar travel. And have been deemed as having a probability of near 100% of originating from another star system since the 1950”s. The reports must of been put in one of those old pneumatic capsules and conveyed into a river never to been looked at. Just like in that Simpson episode. Consensus in the USA won’t be reached until there is a craft sitting above every church, synagogue, mosque, temple, military base and football ground during the whole month of December. Until such an undeniable event all those in control of these places will continue preaching their same rhetoric maintaining the status quo.
With the amount of our air traffic cluttering. the sky at all hours of the day and knowing the effect a close encounter had with that Iranian fighter. These things must be making a concerted effort to keep at a safe distance from all our aircraft.
This is false. You just said these were in databases. I could have wrote a program in 10 minutes to analyze this, and he says it took two years? That can't be right, unless they're incompetent.