I don't wanna be that guy, but this is a false comparison as Forspoken is an open world game and should not be compared to small map games like: DOOM, RE, Dead Space Etc. I don't mean it doesn't run like shit, but optimizing open world game is a whole different beast.
@@VIRT22 even then 3300x and 5600xt can run ac Valhalla at 75fps in high setting consider game has tons of NPC running around Compared.forsporken openworld basically you and enemies and empty lol
wait, how does it run better on FSR quality on 1440p than 1080p without FSR, both on Ultra settings??? maybe FSR is an insane performance boost for AMD, who knows
This is a common practice found in many games. The fact is that input resolution = 1706x960 when FSR 2.0: Quality and output resolution = 2560x1440. However 1440p with FSR 2: Quality looks better than 1080p.
How the hell are you getting these framerates when it runs at 30-50 frames for me with my RX 6600 XT and Ryzen 7 5700X 3.4GHz? I'm getting a refund, what a joke. AMD FX Super Resolution 2.0 helps a ton, but it still won't achieve the 75 frames I need to make it look and feel good on my 75hz 1920x1080 monitor. It's a FreeSync monitor, but I have it turned off because the ghosting gets really bad and FreeSync disables the Overdrive setting on the monitor.
I also get less than 60 fps in the opening scene (essentially a cutscene). But after getting the weapon, Dead Space works well enough with high fps, although patches to improve stability would be nice. Considering that the whole game takes place in a closed space and small corridors, the fps will stay above 60 most of the time.
Timestamps:
0:00 Ray Tracing + FSR: Off + Custom + 1080p
1:40 Ultra + RT: Off + 1080p
3:20 Ultra + RT: Off + FSR: Quality + 1440p
looks better and runs better than Forespoken even tho they share similar requirements. Perfect example on how to actually optimize a game.
I don't wanna be that guy, but this is a false comparison as Forspoken is an open world game and should not be compared to small map games like: DOOM, RE, Dead Space Etc.
I don't mean it doesn't run like shit, but optimizing open world game is a whole different beast.
@@VIRT22 even then 3300x and 5600xt can run ac Valhalla at 75fps in high setting consider game has tons of NPC running around
Compared.forsporken openworld basically you and enemies and empty lol
1440p ultra FSR Quality best setting for me. nice video
Thanks for the benchmark, I'll now buy the game ✌
this is 100% fake, im getting over 40fps less than you with nearly identical specs
Wonderful, so the game will also run ultra on my RX 6600.
No ultra + rt :(
Can you upload your msi afterburner profile? It looks awesome
IF you don't mind me asking, What is the software you are using for the fps visuals. Never saw this style before. thanks.
Msi Afterburner + RTSS. I made the style myself. Not suitable for general use as I have to do a lot of changes for every game and every resolution.
@@GT_Benchmarks that’s fine. Great work and programming. I really like the look.
What are the best settings for image quality in your opinion? Utra without RT or mixed with RT ?
the difference between ultra and high is negligable. so i would go with high+rt
If you have an amd graphics card, it would be best to play without RT since when it is activated the FPS becomes very unstable and produces STUTTERING
So this card is capable of playing every recent title at ultra @ 60 fps in 1080p?
Why not ultra+ RT??
what kind of monitoring program is this?
wait, how does it run better on FSR quality on 1440p than 1080p without FSR, both on Ultra settings??? maybe FSR is an insane performance boost for AMD, who knows
This is a common practice found in many games. The fact is that input resolution = 1706x960 when FSR 2.0: Quality and output resolution = 2560x1440. However 1440p with FSR 2: Quality looks better than 1080p.
@@stanlee4628 oh that's crazy, I didn't know FSR 2.0 on 1440p on Quality still uses a resolution lower than 1080p, thanks for the info!
How the hell are you getting these framerates when it runs at 30-50 frames for me with my RX 6600 XT and Ryzen 7 5700X 3.4GHz? I'm getting a refund, what a joke. AMD FX Super Resolution 2.0 helps a ton, but it still won't achieve the 75 frames I need to make it look and feel good on my 75hz 1920x1080 monitor. It's a FreeSync monitor, but I have it turned off because the ghosting gets really bad and FreeSync disables the Overdrive setting on the monitor.
I also get less than 60 fps in the opening scene (essentially a cutscene). But after getting the weapon, Dead Space works well enough with high fps, although patches to improve stability would be nice. Considering that the whole game takes place in a closed space and small corridors, the fps will stay above 60 most of the time.
The extra cores can really help fps in some games. Not exactly sure why.
simple, the guy who posted the video is lying about the specs. He's a lying clown