They do put biases in their videos, in their video on the Battle of Bosworth Field they literally portray Richard III as a demon. But then there's nothing wrong with bias to tell a story if it is done intelligently.
I like Kings & Generals more as they even question the ancient sources biases more indepth whilst also having better graphics and in general more content.
Always felt Harold would’ve won had he not battled with the Vikings in the north and then marched all the way south to meet William’s forces. William had it easy.
It was probably a mix of that and William's patience. Looking through the details of the battle it's almost hard to believe that William took the engagement, but he bided his time and allowed the English to grow frustrated and impatient with constant charges and withdrawals. It was a gamble, the English lines easily could have held their discipline and probably won by standing still, but it paid off in the end.
@@FlashPointHx Does this mean you will be starting on a project about the history of Normans? Tosney, Byzantine Empire, Tacred's sons, grandsons, great grandsons... Awesome.
it's like you've put all your art works into one master piece . There's something extraordinary about these feats throughout history i just can't explain sometimes but wow .
Oh can you imagine a big budget (historically accurate) telling of William I ‘the Conqueror’ in a movie trilogy 😍 such a fascinating man and his story.
The main issue is that you need time to tell the story of a man of this calibre's life. Second biggest issue is directors and funding not swaying the story to make it "for modern audiences" so william would end up a gay black trans man
Amazing video like usually, but I’m really looking forward for the next parts of Hannibal barca story looking forward to see new videos about it sooner ❤
I do have to give William his respect for being so young and having to come of age fighting his way through betrayal and he did become a great warrior leader and King 👑❤️💯💪
Too bad much like Qin Shi Huang's successors in the Qin Dynasty of China, William's own successors didnt amount to much and the Dynasty died out after a few short successors or within a hundred years or so. Why is it always like that that great leaders are almost never succeeded by good rulers? Most are piss poor rulers. History....tends to repeat itself regardless where you go in the world.
Thank you for creating these long videos. Much appreciation from a fan of you from Sri Lanka. William the conqueror born as a illegitimate child of Robert of Normandy. After securing his rule in Normandy after lengthy battles he focused on war ravaged and fractured England. One of the greatest conquerors in history. Brilliant documentary. Thanks History Marche for creating this documentary🔥🔥🔥🔥 a son of France ♥️🔥 .my fav country in Europe 🌍 Vive la France. 🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵 . I ve also read a comic book which is set in this period. one of the best comics I ever read.
Hardly a son of France. He had twice defeated the French in battle at Mortemer (1054) and Varaville (1057) which would embolden him to move on securing what he saw as his rightful place at the head of the Kingdom of England.
If Harold, after the previous battle, had not marched quite so fast, and given his men time to recuperate, and not decided to rush off into his final battle but instead take the time to raise a larger army he probably survives and wins.
The problem Is that Harold technically usurped the Throne ,so he could had some enemy that see William as a lessen danger,as. well the fighting against Harald didn't did well for the strenght of Harold army..but he could had won this Battle if he was able to control his troops.. However,in a flat terrain his army was no Match for the heavy cavalry of William
@@alessandrogini5283 there are several ways to beat Calvary charges. The most simple was dig pits as the horses charge their legs with step into the pit and snap the horses leg, causing the horse to fall to the ground the rider to fly off and the Thrashing horse was an obstacle to the cavalry charge. Then there’s those spikes I forget what they’re called. There are two pieces of metal welded together with sharpened ends that are bent out so that when you drop them three of the points will be on the ground as a base and the fourth prong will be sticking straight up, so if the horse steps on it, it will cripple the horse. Thirdly, there’s the most famous probably of all the defenses, The pike. The big long pointy stick, and whether it’s driven into the ground is a more permanent, defensive line or just a long sharp pole held by soldiers. It is very effective, because no horse will run onto a wall of sharp pointy sticks. So if Harold find some more defensible area to stop that will not be so advantageous to Williams Calvary, and waits for his reinforcements, while letting his own men recover from the battle and forced march. It puts William in the position of either attacking Harold before all his reinforcements get to him, which means William hast to March thus sapping his troops of some of their strength, when they arrive to do battle, putting both sides on a more even keel in regards to exhaustion. Williams, fine Calvary is no longer a major player, so William is in trouble. William will have to attack Harold’s much more defendable location or sit and wait until Herald out numbers his men to where he can no longer have a chance at winning possibly meaning that William would have to leave England and be harassed all the way out. Let us not forget William was not exactly loved in Normandy. There have been people trying to usurp his power since he was just a child, and his father died, because he was technically an illegitimate child, which means he should not have been able to inherit Control of Normandy let alone England.
One thing that never seems to be mentioned is Saxon archers and the Saxon warbow. Norman archers are mentioned,obviously. But nothing about Saxon archers
He was King. And they were in the heartland of his supporters so he had to do something. But the Queen Mother (his mom) was trying very much to get her sons to stay and wait for more troops. Harald even asked his own younger brothers to stay in case he died but they told him no, we fight too.
Hadrada was in the north, let him raid England freely and he would lose the support of many nobles, hence why his forces were exhausted or fresh recruits.
I love Hadrada’s life story, but I think Goodwinson surprise him with that force March from London. I mean he knew they were in the south coast waiting for Billy and in 7 days they were on his face. Big credit to Goodwinson for that, he tried to replicate it coming down south and even managed to get a good defensive position, however he should have bid his time and regroup better and maybe replenish his housecarls. You cannot win HH and Billy the Conqueror b2b without rest. Anyways, just making my point that Goodwinson is a little bit underrated for all he achieved tho.
Harold could won if he control more the troops,but in a flat terrain and not Mountains,his army was Simply too light to defeat the heavy cavalry of William..instead,he should' had ally with harald against William
he must have give nurthumbria to his brother and made peace with hadrada he lost his fouces from william and we must agree godwin wa not goood commonder @@alessandrogini5283
HistoryMarche, there are more videos that can combine into one video such as: Renaissance (4 Parts) Attack on Moscow ⚔ Napoleon's Strategy in Russia, 1812 (2 Parts) ⚔ DOCUMENTARY First Battle of Tarain, 1191 AD ⚔ The First Islamic Conquest of India and Second Battle of Tarain, 1192 AD ⚔ Muhammad of Ghor Returns.
Better late than never: A Huge (even a "Yuge") thanks for making the series! Many of us peons forget what, as Paul Harvey put it, the Rest Of The Story as to do with the main event.
(History Marche) channel proven its excellence working in previous videos and such as this amazing ,informative & long documentary about skilled William conquerors to ward's deep France 🇫🇷 launched from Normandie & after that launched his invention assaults to ward's England 1066 AD ..😲..what was remarkable he used several political methods besides his men swords powers & struggled his foes successfully...it was magnificent documentary coverage..allot thanks
@@Inkognito-ts4to Hadrada was also a renowned commander. Godwinson managing to win at stamford bridge should be considered a marvellous victory in it’s own right.
@@jamesson1154 Ah yeah. Maybe Instead of “Marvellous”, i should’ve said it was simply a significant victory and a shock since many would expect Hadrada to win over Godwinsson who was comparatively inexperienced as a commander. I think had Harald’s forces been prepared and in their positions, it could’ve ended the other way.
Proud direct descendant to Willam the Conquer🇫🇷🏴 My Grandfather was a proud Anglo Norman. He knew French as well as English sometimes better, and I remember him and my two great aunts would speak to each other in fluent French over English sometimes. I miss them
family back in the day fought at hastings they were thanes..after the battle there lands were taken off them..and the refugees ..most went to to welch marshes and area to live after the battle.. I traced them back further to 996 AD west saxons.. its not in the history books as to what happened after the battle but thats where they went ( wonder if they used boats to cross the bristal channel into wales ) looks like history repeats itself though not as wide as the english channel today ..
More like Aegon in regards to English history leading up towards the War of the Roses. Daenerys was supposed to be like Henry VII, who successfully reconquer his rightful throne after the Civil War
The idea of Harold being hit by an arrow of friendly fire doesn't seem too far fetched after all. Although why,I couldn't guess. But, if you think about it, why would the Norman archers fire their arrows into the air while their own troops were intermixed with the English? Does anyone have some input on that?
Maybe it was a lone archer who seized an opportunity to kill the leader of an opposing army. How Harold died is a legend after all so the details will always be unclear.
The Normans of France were 95% French.. 10-15,000 Scandinavian people were mixed with 200-300,000 natives.. they were mixed for 2 centuries.. there was no longer any taste of Viking blood,2/3 of William's army came from all over France. Scandinavian Normandy is a myth invented by the English
The talk of "unlicensed" cables towards the start of this video has me interested. How exactly did this "licencing" of castles work? Who had the authority (I imagine centrally it would have been the king but it also could have a system for devolution im not sure). If anyone can point me in the right direction to do some research that would be much appreciated
Its like you think it is. It is the same with cities allowed to having walls and such, that practice is as old as time itself and was granted by rulers especially if they had a foreign ruler. Its inverse is also time tested: city walls were often broken down or gaps were created when you were conquered to prevent the region from becoming too strong of an opposing force. While effective in subdueing, it leaves a region unprotected so it was often accompanied with granting rights to other (often minorities/counter balancing) powers in the region. However the best strategy is to have a stable political alliance, because then you could have both, and that is exactly what people found in William and thus flocked to his will.
Hey Buddy can you start making a series on How Marathas defeated mughals in India. There were many battles which happened and a lot of guerilla tacticts which were used by Marathas to defeat mughals. This IMO is Indian Game of Thrones and would take 1 whole series where you can cover different battles such as Battle of Pratapgard, Battle of Pawankind etc. I think you can attract a lot of Indian Audiences from this. Thanks!
“Hinduism and its gods,” says Sir Alfred Lyall: “are a troubled sea, without shore or visible horizon, driven to and fro by the winds of boundless credulity and grotesque invention. A tangled jungle of disorderly superstitions, ghosts and demons, demi-gods and deified saints, household gods, tribe gods, local gods, universal gods, with their countless shrines and temples, and din of their discordant rites, deities who abhor a fly’s death, those who delight still in human victims, and those who would not either sacrifice or make offerings, such religious chaos.” [Asiatic Studies, Vol 1, pp 2, 3]
My family, the Raymond family came across with the Army. Our family seat was just 20 miles east of Norman’s bay at Rye Castle. Raymond (middle and modern English), Reginmund (Old Germanic) or Raimund (old French) is a Germanic name so it’s hard to tell if the name came from the Norse, Danes or the Franks originally.
nice I had two grandfathers at the Battle of Hastings, one Norman and one Anglo-Saxon but both were nobles in the area of Kent. The Anglo-Saxon was the nobleman before the battle (he died in the battle) while the Norman grandfather took his place when William installed his own vassals and two generations later their grandchildren married tying the two families together. the Anglo-Saxon grandfather was named Ethelwolf which means Noble Wolf and is my online persona in medieval games. The Norman was named something far too Frenchy for me to remember or pronounce lol
@@ImpeachObamaASAP2010how in the world would you be able to know all this? This was almost a thousand years ago,its quite hard to believe that this could have been research for (forgive me for this) a family, even if they were small nobles.😮
Norman dynasty died literally within 100 years and got replaced by the French Plantagenet dynasty. Genetically speaking it survived but by through the female line of Empress Matilda. This was also the same case of the Wessex dynasty as it survived through the female line when Matilda of Scotland married Henry the 1st.
"And Ardant du Picq points out that in all his years of conquest, Alexander the Great lost only seven hundred men to the sword. His enemy lost many, many more, but almost all of this occurred after the battle (which appears to have been an almost bloodless pushing match), when the enemy soldiers had turned their backs and begun to run. Carl von Clausewitz makes the same point when he notes that the vast majority of combat losses historically occurred in the pursuit after one side or the other had won the battle. (Why this occurs is a subject that will be looked at in detail in the section "Killing and Physical Distance.")" [Lt. Col. Dave Grossman, On Killing, Revised Edition, 2009]
23:12 in 1882 Arques was renamed Arques-la-bataille to avoid confusion with an homonym town in Picardy. It’s strange to watch your superb video while knowing a lot of the places mentionned 😉
Going from "the Bastard" to "the Conqueror" is a pretty good way to never be questioned again so long as you live.
Still a bastard🙂
This is probably the least biased channel that makes this type of content. I feel like its pure education and no propaganda. Great content
Dont forget there's two sides to a story
They do put biases in their videos, in their video on the Battle of Bosworth Field they literally portray Richard III as a demon. But then there's nothing wrong with bias to tell a story if it is done intelligently.
I like Kings & Generals more as they even question the ancient sources biases more indepth whilst also having better graphics and in general more content.
William was skilled and determined.
But he also got very lucky on multiple occasions.
As most succesful conquers through history, life is usually 99% effort and 1% luck, and to get a large place on history that 1% is quite important
In my experience there is no such thing as luck.
@@daguroswaldson257 nonsense percentages are a fact of life
@@daguroswaldson257 Then you dont have enough experience
it takes skill to capitalize on luck
Legends says that Harold's huscarls, having watching their king's demise, close ranks and fought to the last
I bow to the story telling ability of yours guys, simply amazing to watch. I can sit here all day and it would still feel amazing.
rectangles and squares have never been so exciting
Always felt Harold would’ve won had he not battled with the Vikings in the north and then marched all the way south to meet William’s forces. William had it easy.
It was probably a mix of that and William's patience. Looking through the details of the battle it's almost hard to believe that William took the engagement, but he bided his time and allowed the English to grow frustrated and impatient with constant charges and withdrawals. It was a gamble, the English lines easily could have held their discipline and probably won by standing still, but it paid off in the end.
If the fyrd had not broken their own formation and shield wall at Hastings, Harold would certainly have prevailed.
😛 Coming from Normandy, England is mine now ahahah
@@93200Jonas and luckily for you, had it not been for the English, we Germans would have conquered you 1914 ;)
@@Falkenhayn.Hamburg20 you mean canada
Thank you for putting these together! William was one tough Bastard!!!!
Well put together! Need to review this a few times - hoping to hit up Normandy later this year - Love the detail in your maps
🔥 FPH
@FlashPointHx your content is amazing
love your stuff bro, got me into being more interested in history a couple years ago
@@JuTakii that is awesome to hear!
@@FlashPointHx Does this mean you will be starting on a project about the history of Normans? Tosney, Byzantine Empire, Tacred's sons, grandsons, great grandsons...
Awesome.
it's like you've put all your art works into one master piece . There's something extraordinary about these feats throughout history i just can't explain sometimes but wow .
Little fact- 7:38 The town of Isigny is the origin of the name "Disney". An ancestor of Walt must certainly have been a "Seigneur D'Isigny".
There was a Disney in the battle.
and mickey mouse was their banner
@@HikerBikerMoter Yeah the Death Star with Mickey's ears ^^
Sir Disney a knight in shining armor charges the enemy in battle M-I-C-K-E-Y M-O-U-S-E
@Booz2010The Family probably moved in Ireland after.
Oh can you imagine a big budget (historically accurate) telling of William I ‘the Conqueror’ in a movie trilogy 😍 such a fascinating man and his story.
Most likely be a good tv series much like how Vikings was done up or HBO's Rome.
A trilogy wouldn't be enough IMHO, a serie would be better. William the Conqueror completely changed the destiny of what will be France and England.
They'd make him black with braids. "William the Conqueror was black!!!"
The main issue is that you need time to tell the story of a man of this calibre's life. Second biggest issue is directors and funding not swaying the story to make it "for modern audiences" so william would end up a gay black trans man
Kings and conqueror is releasing soon. Look it up. Super hyped for it hope its good.
It will be a tv show btw not a movie.
That whole series together was great.
Great job! I reall enjoy David's narration he is cool to listen to and not monotone .
He could get with Kings and Generals narrator for a video or two. Both make similar styling videos.
So nice to see these battles put together. One or 2 I had never even heard of.
Thank you again, HistoryMarche!
Amazing video like usually, but I’m really looking forward for the next parts of Hannibal barca story looking forward to see new videos about it sooner ❤
Yes the Hannibal series has been my favourite, i may rewatch it from the start
yea i've been waiting for them to finish that one for a while
I second that
it’s a looong story but yes we want it
37:39 - incweasing :)
This is such a epically brilliant video. The long form allows for real insights into medieval politics
I do have to give William his respect for being so young and having to come of age fighting his way through betrayal and he did become a great warrior leader and King 👑❤️💯💪
Too bad much like Qin Shi Huang's successors in the Qin Dynasty of China, William's own successors didnt amount to much and the Dynasty died out after a few short successors or within a hundred years or so. Why is it always like that that great leaders are almost never succeeded by good rulers? Most are piss poor rulers. History....tends to repeat itself regardless where you go in the world.
Wow this is extremely well done. Definitely will be watching more of this channel
Thank you for creating these long videos. Much appreciation from a fan of you from Sri Lanka. William the conqueror born as a illegitimate child of Robert of Normandy. After securing his rule in Normandy after lengthy battles he focused on war ravaged and fractured England. One of the greatest conquerors in history. Brilliant documentary. Thanks History Marche for creating this documentary🔥🔥🔥🔥 a son of France ♥️🔥 .my fav country in Europe 🌍 Vive la France. 🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵 . I ve also read a comic book which is set in this period. one of the best comics I ever read.
Hardly a son of France.
He had twice defeated the French in battle at Mortemer (1054) and Varaville (1057) which would embolden him to move on securing what he saw as his rightful place at the head of the Kingdom of England.
@@doug6500 yes so I think we should consider him as a norman and a Englishman.
Victory for Norman France!
My last name is a testament of Norman English supremacy
The Duchy of Normandy was part of France. He should paid tribute to the French King every year. He was French, French dad is language.
If Harold, after the previous battle, had not marched quite so fast, and given his men time to recuperate, and not decided to rush off into his final battle but instead take the time to raise a larger army he probably survives and wins.
The problem Is that Harold technically usurped the Throne ,so he could had some enemy that see William as a lessen danger,as. well the fighting against Harald didn't did well for the strenght of Harold army..but he could had won this Battle if he was able to control his troops.. However,in a flat terrain his army was no Match for the heavy cavalry of William
@@alessandrogini5283 there are several ways to beat Calvary charges. The most simple was dig pits as the horses charge their legs with step into the pit and snap the horses leg, causing the horse to fall to the ground the rider to fly off and the Thrashing horse was an obstacle to the cavalry charge. Then there’s those spikes I forget what they’re called. There are two pieces of metal welded together with sharpened ends that are bent out so that when you drop them three of the points will be on the ground as a base and the fourth prong will be sticking straight up, so if the horse steps on it, it will cripple the horse. Thirdly, there’s the most famous probably of all the defenses, The pike. The big long pointy stick, and whether it’s driven into the ground is a more permanent, defensive line or just a long sharp pole held by soldiers. It is very effective, because no horse will run onto a wall of sharp pointy sticks. So if Harold find some more defensible area to stop that will not be so advantageous to Williams Calvary, and waits for his reinforcements, while letting his own men recover from the battle and forced march. It puts William in the position of either attacking Harold before all his reinforcements get to him, which means William hast to March thus sapping his troops of some of their strength, when they arrive to do battle, putting both sides on a more even keel in regards to exhaustion. Williams, fine Calvary is no longer a major player, so William is in trouble. William will have to attack Harold’s much more defendable location or sit and wait until Herald out numbers his men to where he can no longer have a chance at winning possibly meaning that William would have to leave England and be harassed all the way out. Let us not forget William was not exactly loved in Normandy. There have been people trying to usurp his power since he was just a child, and his father died, because he was technically an illegitimate child, which means he should not have been able to inherit Control of Normandy let alone England.
Amazeballs. History En Marche is truly a gift to the aspiring war lord. 🤣
One thing that never seems to be mentioned is Saxon archers and the Saxon warbow. Norman archers are mentioned,obviously. But nothing about Saxon archers
Maybe they weren't present?
“I died-Yours truly, Robert” Now that’s a guy who doesn’t beat around the bush
Harold so unlucky, damn. Why he just didn't wait in London and fortify? He just entered the battle with fresh peasants and some man at arms...
He was King. And they were in the heartland of his supporters so he had to do something. But the Queen Mother (his mom) was trying very much to get her sons to stay and wait for more troops. Harald even asked his own younger brothers to stay in case he died but they told him no, we fight too.
His mother urged him to take immediate action. He followed her advice or admonition.
Hadrada was in the north, let him raid England freely and he would lose the support of many nobles, hence why his forces were exhausted or fresh recruits.
Wasn't his style. His idea of campaigns were speedy marches, as evidenced by his earlier actions versus the Welsh.
He wanted to take William by surprise, like he did the Vikings at Stamford Bridge. Good scouting by the Norman's foiled that plan tho.
I love Hadrada’s life story, but I think Goodwinson surprise him with that force March from London. I mean he knew they were in the south coast waiting for Billy and in 7 days they were on his face. Big credit to Goodwinson for that, he tried to replicate it coming down south and even managed to get a good defensive position, however he should have bid his time and regroup better and maybe replenish his housecarls. You cannot win HH and Billy the Conqueror b2b without rest. Anyways, just making my point that Goodwinson is a little bit underrated for all he achieved tho.
Harold could won if he control more the troops,but in a flat terrain and not Mountains,his army was Simply too light to defeat the heavy cavalry of William..instead,he should' had ally with harald against William
he must have give nurthumbria to his brother and made peace with hadrada he lost his fouces from william and we must agree godwin wa not goood commonder @@alessandrogini5283
HistoryMarche, there are more videos that can combine into one video such as:
Renaissance (4 Parts)
Attack on Moscow ⚔ Napoleon's Strategy in Russia, 1812 (2 Parts) ⚔ DOCUMENTARY
First Battle of Tarain, 1191 AD ⚔ The First Islamic Conquest of India and Second Battle of Tarain, 1192 AD ⚔ Muhammad of Ghor Returns.
Thanks fpr for your hard work HM! Love the series
Another awesome video thanks!
This is the greatest video of this event I've ever seen! Very very cool. Kudos to you dude!
World class animation and sounds ♥️🙏 thank you
Better late than never: A Huge (even a "Yuge") thanks for making the series! Many of us peons forget what, as Paul Harvey put it, the Rest Of The Story as to do with the main event.
I yugely approve you use of yuge.
@@ImpeachObamaASAP2010 Slow Clap! 🤙🤙🤙
3:40 SHEEESH
He must've done something HEINOUS to be attacked like that at a wedding feast.
50:00 The king pointed at the killer, but they all acted like he pointed at next king lol
(History Marche) channel proven its excellence working in previous videos and such as this amazing ,informative & long documentary about skilled William conquerors to ward's deep France 🇫🇷 launched from Normandie & after that launched his invention assaults to ward's England 1066 AD ..😲..what was remarkable he used several political methods besides his men swords powers & struggled his foes successfully...it was magnificent documentary coverage..allot thanks
Amazing content as always!
very informative and well narrated. many thanks and godspeed!
Who would win in a battle Harold hardrada and his Viking Army vs William the Conqueror and his Norman Army
hadrada his army was a better version of the Anglo Saxon army at Hastings and the Anglo Saxons almost won
@@Inkognito-ts4to Hadrada was also a renowned commander. Godwinson managing to win at stamford bridge should be considered a marvellous victory in it’s own right.
@@ecaeas4439 not really, most of Haralds men were unarmored but they still went into battle. Godwinson literally caught them with their pants down.
@@ecaeas4439 harald lost only because he couldn't gather all his forces quick enough since he was disembarking still
@@jamesson1154 Ah yeah. Maybe Instead of “Marvellous”, i should’ve said it was simply a significant victory and a shock since many would expect Hadrada to win over Godwinsson who was comparatively inexperienced as a commander. I think had Harald’s forces been prepared and in their positions, it could’ve ended the other way.
Very good. Thanks for putting this together
Very good job indeed! Bravo! Music, video, plus information! A++
Thank you! Loved this series! William the Conqueror is one of history's greatest kings!
This is my favorite war history channel.
Look at how small Normandy is.... Just blows my mind. How do you mess around and decide and make england your's.
This program is awesome. I love the production and narration. I have no idea how I haven’t seen this page before.
Proud direct descendant to Willam the Conquer🇫🇷🏴
My Grandfather was a proud Anglo Norman. He knew French as well as English sometimes better, and I remember him and my two great aunts would speak to each other in fluent French over English sometimes. I miss them
I'd always heard the famous stuff, but now I know the full story. Thank you.
50:00 That skull with the tongue out was funny as hell
family back in the day fought at hastings they were thanes..after the battle there lands were taken off them..and the refugees ..most went to to welch marshes and area to live after the battle..
I traced them back further to 996 AD west saxons..
its not in the history books as to what happened after the battle but thats where they went ( wonder if they used boats to cross the bristal channel into wales ) looks like history repeats itself
though not as wide as the english channel today ..
King William I the Conqueror was a direct male line descendant of Antiochus II Theos. 👑💍🇬🇧
THanks, I was thinking about this the other day
the talk bubbles are hilarious. @47:24 " Normans Suck!" xD
This is awesome. HBO needs the rights to this
Eagerly awaiting the next hannibal upload.
He is like Robert Baratheon in France and Aegon conquer in England.
More like Aegon in regards to English history leading up towards the War of the Roses. Daenerys was supposed to be like Henry VII, who successfully reconquer his rightful throne after the Civil War
The idea of Harold being hit by an arrow of friendly fire doesn't seem too far fetched after all. Although why,I couldn't guess. But, if you think about it, why would the Norman archers fire their arrows into the air while their own troops were intermixed with the English? Does anyone have some input on that?
Maybe it was a lone archer who seized an opportunity to kill the leader of an opposing army. How Harold died is a legend after all so the details will always be unclear.
Great job, thank you for sharing your excellence.
Real life game of thrones. Awesome episode, great channel !!
Love your content!!!!
Vikings from France and Norway competing each other for crown of England
The Normans of France were 95% French.. 10-15,000 Scandinavian people were mixed with 200-300,000 natives.. they were mixed for 2 centuries.. there was no longer any taste of Viking blood,2/3 of William's army came from all over France. Scandinavian Normandy is a myth invented by the English
3:19 Oi! You gotta loisense fo' that cahsol mate?
Did I read that right? Emma of Normandy was 104 when she died? That's an amazingly long life for that time 😳
No she died at the age of 68. Guess it was a typo by them.
The talk of "unlicensed" cables towards the start of this video has me interested. How exactly did this "licencing" of castles work? Who had the authority (I imagine centrally it would have been the king but it also could have a system for devolution im not sure). If anyone can point me in the right direction to do some research that would be much appreciated
Its like you think it is. It is the same with cities allowed to having walls and such, that practice is as old as time itself and was granted by rulers especially if they had a foreign ruler. Its inverse is also time tested: city walls were often broken down or gaps were created when you were conquered to prevent the region from becoming too strong of an opposing force.
While effective in subdueing, it leaves a region unprotected so it was often accompanied with granting rights to other (often minorities/counter balancing) powers in the region. However the best strategy is to have a stable political alliance, because then you could have both, and that is exactly what people found in William and thus flocked to his will.
Hey Buddy can you start making a series on How Marathas defeated mughals in India. There were many battles which happened and a lot of guerilla tacticts which were used by Marathas to defeat mughals. This IMO is Indian Game of Thrones and would take 1 whole series where you can cover different battles such as Battle of Pratapgard, Battle of Pawankind etc. I think you can attract a lot of Indian Audiences from this. Thanks!
“Hinduism and its gods,” says Sir Alfred Lyall:
“are a troubled sea, without shore or visible horizon, driven to and fro by the winds of boundless credulity and grotesque invention. A tangled jungle of disorderly superstitions, ghosts and demons, demi-gods and deified saints, household gods, tribe gods, local gods, universal gods, with their countless shrines and temples, and din of their discordant rites, deities who abhor a fly’s death, those who delight still in human victims, and those who would not either sacrifice or make offerings, such religious chaos.” [Asiatic Studies, Vol 1, pp 2, 3]
@@youwhat491 Cool
Great production as always.
Excellent video!
*"You're not that Guy pal"* - William
YESS I WANTED THIS, THANK YOUU
I live in York and Stamford bridge is really cool there are Viking ships around it it’s pretty cool
I’ve been to the battle of Hastings hill it’s very steep !!
It has been a while since you last posted a video about the Second Punic War, you know.
Looks like I'm playing age of empire with document, amazing style of presenting history.
Thank you for learning this
great England that shaped the world
France conquered England and all of Europe
@@adelaidesngan604
it did not only conquer it also colonized
My family, the Raymond family came across with the Army. Our family seat was just 20 miles east of Norman’s bay at Rye Castle. Raymond (middle and modern English), Reginmund (Old Germanic) or Raimund (old French) is a Germanic name so it’s hard to tell if the name came from the Norse, Danes or the Franks originally.
Amazing story!
nice I had two grandfathers at the Battle of Hastings, one Norman and one Anglo-Saxon but both were nobles in the area of Kent. The Anglo-Saxon was the nobleman before the battle (he died in the battle) while the Norman grandfather took his place when William installed his own vassals and two generations later their grandchildren married tying the two families together.
the Anglo-Saxon grandfather was named Ethelwolf which means Noble Wolf and is my online persona in medieval games. The Norman was named something far too Frenchy for me to remember or pronounce lol
@@ImpeachObamaASAP2010how in the world would you be able to know all this? This was almost a thousand years ago,its quite hard to believe that this could have been research for (forgive me for this) a family, even if they were small nobles.😮
The Counts of Toulouse were often called Raymond, so it's probably more Frankish.
@thibaultsardet7399 No it comes from the old Germanic Reginmumd or Regin meaning council or wise and Mund meaning protector or hand.
Can you please do the dacian wars
Great stuff, thanks
This channel is soooooo DAMN GOOD
Awesome video love it
good, very good video...congrats
love this, fantastic vid. cant say that enough
Great work.
french cavarly made huge impacte in this battle
Outstanding thanks
From Rollo to William the Conqueror.
What potential there is (TV show)
What an amazing journey.
Hi love your videos, an idea for another one the Campaign by Robert the Bruce into Northern England 1314- 1322. Two battles at least
I was wondering what happened to Hannibal series. Did you guys abandoned it or are you going to finish it some day?
I'll be finishing part 19 soon.
@@HistoryMarche oh that's awesome. Thank you very much guys, I love your videos, really ❤️❤️❤️
Harold at hastings is what describes as exhausted due to war... Unlike the wrongly excuse given to both roman and persian against arabs
Isn't William of Normandy's dynasty still in existence? I mean sure his house only lasted about 88 years but his dynasty lives on
He continued indirectly with the Plantagenets.
Norman dynasty died literally within 100 years and got replaced by the French Plantagenet dynasty. Genetically speaking it survived but by through the female line of Empress Matilda. This was also the same case of the Wessex dynasty as it survived through the female line when Matilda of Scotland married Henry the 1st.
"And Ardant du Picq points out that in all his years of conquest, Alexander the Great lost only seven hundred men to the sword. His enemy lost many, many more, but almost all of this occurred after the battle (which appears to have been an almost bloodless pushing match), when the enemy soldiers had turned their backs and begun to run. Carl von Clausewitz makes the same point when he notes that the vast majority of combat losses historically occurred in the pursuit after one side or the other had won the battle. (Why this occurs is a subject that will be looked at in detail in the section "Killing and Physical Distance.")"
[Lt. Col. Dave Grossman, On Killing, Revised Edition, 2009]
23:12 in 1882 Arques was renamed Arques-la-bataille to avoid confusion with an homonym town in Picardy.
It’s strange to watch your superb video while knowing a lot of the places mentionned 😉
Much better channel than Kings and Shills.
Is this about Ukraine?
@@jarogniewtheconqueror2804 Something like that.
@@homelessjesse9453 He is biased but I saw him change number of casualties for the Russians from 90k to 10k so he lowkey admitted to false reporting
@@jarogniewtheconqueror2804 I just wish they would admit this whole thing started in 2014 and not 2022 like the media has been lying about.
@@jarogniewtheconqueror2804 Above all, it is still much too early to talk about it fully.
Awesome!
Thanks! I've been an enthusiast of this battle since the strategy game Empire Earth British Campaign.
Great, another video about William, England and anglo-saxons. Next Azincourt or Crecy plese. Or war of the roses, never enough of that😅
Your videos are currently the life blood of my breaks at work
I hope one day he covers the batter of He fei.
Thanks
Thank you so much for the support. Very kind of you!
I played this in the new Age of Empire game 😄😄
Well, he was not the only one to conquer England.
Nor was he first!