Somewhere on the net I saw a short video about the first ride of the original Daimler: Mrs. Daimler drove it (not Mr. ) with her kids & stuff to visit granma, so if you apply purpose as classification rule, the first car was a minivan.
It's funny to me that automakers are currently shoehorning 3rd row seating into every crossover. The 3-row crossover is the vehicle people buy when they say, "But I don't want a minivan!" The crossover wants to be a minivan, but is worse in every measurable metric.
Your absolutely right here even worse if someone buys just a front wheel drive crossover. It's like what's the point? Sure ok, by default the minivan isn't a sports car or anything sexy... but how many SUVs fit that bill let alone look unique? Nearly every SUV just kinda looks the same. At least the minivan market is unique enough that you can easily tell the difference between a Honda and a Chrysler with different ride dynamics to boot. Most SUVs just kinda look and drive the same. I think that will only get worse once everything is electric. They'll all share the same platforms and drivetrains. You watch and some call the minivan boring... lol.
@@EdsAutoReviews Some automakers keep trying to make their minivans more "Crossover-like" in an attempt to make them appeal to the CUV crowd. I don't think it ever really works though. GM tried it when they stapled a new longer "truck-like" nose onto their Venture and Montana vans and changed the names.
@@EdsAutoReviews Well the 2005 Chevy uplander definitely tries. It's got a long snout, and c pillar but that thing ain't fooling anyone. It's a face lifted Chevy Venture with less amenities. Think of simple things like cup holders in the doors, the Uplander doesn't even have that. Just an optional tray and two in dash cup holders. That's it. Believe it or not. Even the Venture gave you one in each door and if you want to talk about the lack of power the 3500 v6 that unfortunately graced these things runs out of steam almost as fast a Yugo. Rides like one too. Even in it's high end, heated leather seat configuration the thing absolutely rides like a drunken horse. Having that huge snout doesn't help parking any either. GM basically gave it the worst features of a minivan with the worst features of an SUV.. to make matters worse it doesn't add anything to the package. Even the Ford Freestar offered fold down to the floor seats! The Chevy Uplander? Nope. You can't even easily enter the 3rd row without snagging your clothing on some metal seat frame! Some might knock the Mercedes Benz vans for It's flaws, but that thing was designed to be a cargo van, not a passenger van so of course it lacks the features one might expect of one. Again this was a 2005 model, it was almost laughable that GM tried selling this. Clearly they didn't put much effort or time to consider what the market wanted out of a family hauler. The only good point I can say about it is the overhead DVD rail system is fairly nifty if you can get beyond the silly 6 inch screen and cheap plastics. It might have been GM at its worst, but this couldn't even pull off being a cargo van let alone some cushy crossover. It's clear to see why GM doesn't bother making minivans anymore. It's best attempt was as boring as unpainted dry wall and it's worst was an laughable pot belly pig or a dust buster.
I worked at a Dodge dealership in the 1980s, and our Dodge Caravan out sold everything and I still think it is the best vehicle ever made. Chrysler quality was unbeatable
We recently rented a new Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid to drive across the US twice. We first balked at having to drive a minivan thousands of miles. We were pleasantly surprised at how well it was appointed, how incredibly practical is was, how fuel efficient it was and how well it drove at nearly triple digit speeds for hours on end. It really had us rethinking the while minivan proposition.
There are new, imported Japanese minivans here in Australia, because some come from the factory with a wheelchair lift or ramp. Cars can be imported here no matter their age if there is no similar vehicle sold domestically, its often cheaper than doing conversions too.
There are plenty of grey import vans here. I love the look of the Nissan and Toyota's, low, fat & wide with tinted windows, too much chrome and alloy wheels to match...
Interesting! There are a few companies in the U.S. that do minivan conversions for ramps or lifts, but no vans are sold from the factory that way. I think the conversion companies work with the automakers to develop a standard process for the conversions, though.
So much of NZ and Australia's second hand car market are just grey imports from Japan. It's kinda crazy if you stop and think about the ammount of vehicles.
The way I understood Chrysler’s development of the minivan came from Lee Iococca during his tenure at Ford. They were working on the minivan concept for the US market which was shot down by upper management. There was tension between Lee and the CEO of Ford and when Lee was fired he took the concept with him. That and the K car saved Chrysler with government supported bailout funds.
That's true. Lee and Henry Ford II didn't get along well. So Lee got fired in the late 70s and took some of the talent behind the Ford Carrousel concept back to Chrysler. Not only Chrysler paid their debt in advance, they got so much money reserves they were able to purchase AMC, Lamborghini and release new platforms and powertrains after a decade of solely developing K-Car based vehicles. Some people may still think Chrysler Corporation's best era was the 60s to early 70s, but financially speaking the mid 80s to mid 90s were even better. Unfortunately, we all know what happened after that...
@@luisinhoens90 Not so in the 70's oil crisis. They only had V8 gas guzzlers, dated cars. They then slapped together the ominious Dodge Omni (!) and sold rebadged Diamond Star cute but crappy cars.
11:52 It is a sad commontary on the way that Peugeot had damaged Citroen that the latter found anything "too risky". I mean this was the company that gambled on front wheel drive in the 1930s, that started engineering work on the French answer to the Ford Model T in the 1930s, and created the spaceship like DS with hydropneumatic suspension. The idea that they could consider any concept "too risky" is sad.
I get that but on the other hand it was exactly this behaviour which nearly resulted in the collapse of Citroën in the form of the SM. Without Peugeot we wouldn’t have Citroën…
Thank you so much for mentioning the Scout Scarab. Most people just completely ignore the earlier parts of history that later had a comeback. Early electric cars, for example where almost completely forgotten. At the start of the video I was talking to my screen saying, "Please mention the Scarab," Thank you again. Great video.
I just watched a 20 minute video on minivans and I don't regret it one bit. Eds ability to tell a story is so good I'm sure he can make a story about paint drying
One, to me, interesting aspect of the minivan when it first arrived in the United States. For regulatory reasons, which is a nice way of saying the automotive industry got what they wanted, they were considered light trucks and not as passenger vehicles even though the Chrysler was built on a front wheel drive passenger car platform. This not only let them have a higher fuel consumption allowance, but, also meant they did not have to meet the more stringent passenger car crash and safety standards. So, you have a vehicle specifically designed and marketed to carry families with young children that did not meet the more stringent, even then, safety standards of the time. If you can find me something more screwed up than that I'd like to hear it. This definitely cost lives.
@@jimjamauto you are quite wrong. School buses have been crash tested all the way back into the 1930s. Despite your uninformed opinion, they are extremely safe. Very hard to find an example of a child being killed while on one
We owned a steady progression of Dodge and Plymouth minivans for our growing, young family throughout the 2000’s and 2010’s. They were just what we needed.
I am currently still using my parent's old 2002 Chrysler Voyager as a commuter. It's decent on gas, fits in most parking spaces, plenty of room for my tools, and I don't care if it gets dinged up in a crowded parking garage.
@@henryfleischer404 (update) Just after posting the original comment I had an accident with it and had to retire it. 😀 I just replaced it with a 2015 Grand Caravan. All the newer minivans regardless of brand are the same length. About a foot and a half longer than the ol' Voyager. I'd prefer the more compact size.
11:19 that looks fairly similar to the Land Rover Discovery, excluding the front end. The cars were decades apart, but it's still interesting, seeing the similarities.
Great Episode, absolutely love the 1980s part! From European perspective, one might want to add two significant compact minivans which i was kind of missing in this video: The Volkswagen Touran, a compact version of the Sharan, being continously successful in Europe, more than 2.5 million units being sold since 2003 The Dacia Jogger, a budget 7seater minivan introduced in 2022, a clear sign this segment is not dead
Ahh, the Caravan. The perfect family driving pod. My son is still using our 2005. Stow-and-go seating, a sliding door on each side, and 300,000 km on the odometer. Starting to rust now but still going strong.
I love the video. As an American of a certain age I live through all of this. Couple of bits of trivia. In the mid 80s the Japanese also saw this phenomenon and decided to compete in the United States. Toyota first, then Nissan and Mitsubishi, brought over there Japanese vans to the US. Both passenger and cargo versions. These were one box Cabover real wheel drive designs. I think the Toyota version sold OK for a while but then interest disappeared. They really weren't competitive in the US market because of their size and power. Not to mention they looked like complete death traps in the front. These days Chrysler sells a minivan in the United States, along with Honda, Kia and of course, Toyota. The new sienna is a complete re-design and only sold as a hybrid. It cells pretty well
I remember those 1980s mid-engined Japanese vans...friend of mine in college had the Toyota Van. I also recall the Nissan Van was prone to engine fires and eventually Nissan bought all of them back from customers
@@chrisfreemesser5707 A guy I knew with a Toyota van used to drive it like Dan Gurney at the Indy 500. The bumper only being a foot in front of the driver always worried me.
I was a parts driver for a So. CA Toyota dealership in 89-90, Had this van as one of our delivery vehicles. Fun to drive as I recall, but in the cargo van configuration it had poor visibility to the rear and large blind spots.
The Nissan Prairie (sold as the "Multi" in Canada and the Stanza Wagon in the US) was the first vehicle sold here that had sliding doors on both sides. The follow up "Axxess" also had sliding doors on both sides. It would be a while longer before any of the US made minivans got sliding doors on both sides - I don't know why considering that it's a pretty obvious idea. I think these could both be considered minivans, but neither had a real third row option (just side or rear facing jump seats in the back).
@@bobroberts2371 which makes perfect sense for a cargo van or large passenger van. But for minivans two sliding doors makes more sense - note that they all have them now.
The Prairie not only offered a real third row seat, but also a front 3 seat option, so you could buy an 8 seater Prairie. In fact that was their development principle, being able to sit 8 adults inside. But those models weren't offered in the US or Canada, or many other countries... They only sold in Japan, Australia and other bunch of countries. And to be fair, the third row may be for Japanese adults, but not for taller people overseas. I own an 8 seater Prairie and it's great, I don't get why it couldn't be considered a minivan as well as the Chariot that was a 7 seater... And both Prairie and Chariot released before the Voyager and so...
@@rogersmith7396 I have no experience with the powered sliding doors, but my grandparents' minivan doors never leaked. After all, they don't just slide -- when closing, they push in too, much like a regular swinging door.
I grew up in a family that always had a minivan. We still have two! But with most of the kids now adults, myself included, my mom will probably get an SUV or crossover in the near future since she likes the higher ride height
Interesting. I also grew up in a minivan family and have one for my own family. My elderly parents actually perfect the seat height of the minivan but drives a crossover bc my mom prefers smaller vehicles. My dad usually drives my minivan to shuttle my kids even tho his suv is much fancier. He (as do I) love the versatility and functionality of the minivan.
@@Wasabi9111 mom had a chevy 2004~ blazer before this but it was costing to much to fuel/running costs ect and before that was a Oldsmobile hard-top/4-door cuttly but her excuse was is it didn't fit her single party/drunk moms needs but she's more historically a GT car buyer and would likely go back to that or a sports car or mini truck aka something like the ford ranger but all electric as now days she loves gardening something about being therapeutic and or keeping her out of trouble with the law ect
I recently bought a new Pacifica hybrid for my family and love it. I traded in a 2013 Mercedes ML 550 for it and honestly, the Pacifica is so much better to live with. Who cares that it's not "cool".
My first car was a misubishi expo lrv, a usdm short wheelbase chariot. It was awesome. Good to see it referenced anywhere, even briefly! Great job as always Ed.
When the Chrysler minivan came out I had a wife, daughter, son, dog,and cat. I was conciering a station wagon but did not want to feed the fuel consuption they were noted for. It lasted for 13 years and I concider it the best automotive investment I ever made.
I've owned a number - Caravan..Voyager..Silhouette..GMC Safari (Same as Chev Astro). I loved the Safari. It was built on the S10 pickup platform and as such had a full frame. Really great tow capacity.
My parents got a Dodge Grand Caravan when I was young. It really was just like a tall spacious car. I remember liking the wedge look of the Transport but my dad went with the Dodge which was a good call in hindsight. Had friend whose parents had a Ford Aerostar. What a hunk of junk. It definitely felt like a van: tall and wobbly; felt like you were in a metal box as opposed to a car.
Don’t tell anyone, but my Town and Country is the most practical vehicle I have ever owned. Other than being made as cheap as possible, it have been very reliable and good for everything from getting wood, going camping, hauling kids and people.
When my wife and I were expecting child #4 in 2006 it was decided to -upgrade- buy a minivan, a 06 Grand Caravan. For all the fun I poke at it, it's been good. Still have it. In fact, yesterday it turned over 299K miles. From Texas, it's taken us as far south as Monterey Mexico and as far north as Indianapolis Indiana.
As an aging life-long American car guy, I've really enjoyed your videos. One quibble with the last bit of this one, though. I've lived and worked in China off and on for a long time (decades). China is *NOT* undergoing a new baby boom. But the minivan is definitely a thriving car type there. One of it's primary applications is short-haul business transport (to and from meetings in the same city, between nearby cities, picking people up from the airport, etc.). Upscale (even "tuner") customized minivans are part of the stable of personal cars maintained by wealthy Chinese for moving their large entourages of lackeys, yes-men and mistresses around. But no baby boom.
My friends mom had a Dodge Caravan Turbo Manual 5-speed back in the day. We used to borrow it a lot to cruise around town in. What she didn't know is that before we would leave, we would take out all the seats except the front two seats. The van was a total sleeper. Even the cops were surprised when we would pull away from Mustangs from stoplight to stoplight. The van became sort of a thing that summer. Beige with wood panel and a little Turbo badge on the side.
Bravo on this, Mr. Ed! It really is kind of sad to see the minivan fade away into history. My parents had a handful of them while I was growing up.. a ‘92 Previa, ‘00 Ford Windstar, ‘04 Honda Odyssey and a couple Mid ‘00’s Caravans that faithfully carted us around and tolerated my first-time-driver antics 😆🙈 Don’t know if it’s been done already, but you should look into the history of the small pickup with all of its ups/downs!
To add to the story. The Ford Aerostar and GM Astro minivans were front engine/rear drive vehicles based on small/mid-sized car platforms. The Ford version had terrible problems with weak automatic transmissions. Ford later shifted their minivan to the FWD Taurus car platform and named it the Windstar. GM also offered a second generation minivan, like with Ford's Windstar with FWD and based on mid-sized/large size car platforms. Sadly too the Chrysler/Dodge/Plymouth minivans have had problems with their automatic transmissions during much of their run until the last 10 years or so. Chrysler/Dodge, Honda and Toyota minivans are still sold here in the USA and Canada, mainly to large families.
The Astro and Safari were Mid Size Vans not mini vans, they were 18% smaller than the full size G Series vans of the time and shared much of their under pinnings with the S10 and S10 Blazer. The big difference with the Astro and Safari besides their size is that at the end of the day, they were designed to be a smaller G Series with creature comforts not found in a van, the Caravan, Lumina MPV, Winstar, Venture/Transport/Montana, and Uplander/Montana SV6 were from day one MPVs, meant to be people haulers with extra cargo space. Basically Astros are at the end of the day still light trucks and based on a commercial vehicle platform, where as the Caravan was a K Car with a Van body
I remember my mom buying one of the first Plymouth caravans that came out. People (mainly adults with children) were constantly wanting to see what this new vehicle was all about. I was starting to drive and I’d load up friends on the weekends for fishing, football games, and heading toward the beach. There wasn’t a stigma attached to it when it first came out.
The Previa was offered in the US with AWD, a turbo and a manual. The Aerostar and Caravan were also available with manuals. The Caravan could also be bought with a turbo.
The minivan is a very useful vehicle for those who are handicapped. The sliding driver side door can hold wheelchairs or other mobility aids while the owner can still use the driver entrance. The scarcity of these models will make it harder for the disabled to get adequate transportation.
Had a real good laugh about the Fiat Useless, love it xD. Ford and VW discontinuing their mv's is not quiet right. Here in Europe VW still offers the Sharan and the smaller Touran while Ford still offers the Galaxy, S-Max and C-Max (Edit: and even the B-Max). Same thing with the Focus and Fiesta.
@@danielpassigmailcom Yes thats right. Thats because its allways about that type of "big" cars in the U.S. There seems to be not enough demand/ profit margin for "small cars" except when there are crises and/ or you can't effort to buy anything but small fuel efficient cars. While here in Europe the trend is going towards SUV's and Crossovers too they are even smaller than what you guys would consider "compact" or "small". Just look at the 2014 EcoSport or 2019 Puma from Ford or the 2017 T-Roc, 2018 T-Cross and 2021 Taigo from VW. They are offered alongside the Fiesta/Focus and UP/Polo/Golf .
A coworker bought a Dodge Caravan in early 84, with wood paneling on the sides. We all came out to look at this strange creature. After only a few minutes we were convinced that despite its shortcomings (sliding door only on one side and lackadaisical power) it was a true game changer.
Thanks for another brilliantly well thought out and edited video. You’ve temporarily made minivans ‘cool’… well maybe not cool … but rather ‘interesting’ again. Cheers!
I think as a precursor you should also consider the "so much obscure you didn't noticed it existed" 1914 A.L.F.A. (later Alfa-Romeo) 40/60 HP Aerodinamica which is more aerodynamic than the CGV and very much a monovolume
Nice to see you include the old British Commer, always thought it was a cute and friendly shape (also liked the Bedford van). Would like more songs in future videos! ;)
The fact you recalled the Lancia Megagamma is pretty much remarkable And by the way, it is the FIAT Ulysse, not useless. And the Zafira still exists, even if it called Zafira Life and it is just the passenger version of the Vivaro, related to the Citroen Jumpy and its twins.
I don't like the way Stellantis is going. It seems all of their vans and some other cars are suddenly replaced by Peugeots, while both Opel and FIAT had nicer platforms and more innovative engineering. You can recognise the Peugeot platform very quickly from one of the symptoms of its idiotic budget design: a noticeable pause after you press the horn. You can almost get out the calendar, count the weeks until impact, have the collision and only then the horn will warn the other traffic. I haven't tested the latest Peugeot or Opel Astra for the way they drive but I severely disliked the handling of some modernish mid range Peugeots. Let's hope they at least improved on that.
I recently traded my Dodge Grand Caravan for a Ram 1500 crew cab. Essentially I sacrificed the 3rd row seat for a truck bed, but both vehicles have the same engine (albeit the truck has been tuned to 305 hp vs 285 hp in the van). Overall where I live in the US, a truck is much more versatile for what my needs are than a minivan now.
Great video, Ed. I was once the proud owner of a Dodge Grand Caravan... and adorned with genuine imitation woodgrain siding. Oh, those were the days. Really enjoy your videos and thanks for all the work you put into these videos for us.
I had a '92 Aerostar that was perfect for my family of four kids and at least one dog. When the SUV's came out, my thoughts were (and still are), "What -- we're going back to the station wagons we grew up with in the 60's and 70's?"
The question is are they really innovative these days? Apart from the Chrysler Airflow Concept and the Pacifica and Pacifica PHEV, they're not doing much. The Voyager is a Pacifica with less options at a cheaper price, and the 300 is outsold by the Dodge Charger and Challenger because they decided to drop the SRT8 for the North American market. I really hope they get innovative again so they don't go bankrupt again.
Its what they do. The 50s tailfin cars rusted out in about two years and no one would be caught dead in one after 4 years. Their muscle cars were completely over the top.
@@rogersmith7396 And you should just enjoy it. But personally i wouldn't keep a fiat/chrysler product for too many miles. I think its common knowledge by now most of their engines dont reach toyota mileages without problems.
I really enjoyed that! I have been an owner of a 1996 and 2003 Astrovan (currently), and I love em. Arguably the largest mini-van available. I have put considerable money into upkeep. I use it for both family AND business -- the making and delivery of doors. The Astro is irreplaceable. It is the perfect, perfect size for me. I wish somebody else would make something like it! If my Astro blew up, I wouldn't know what to replace it with. And its looks are incredible. What originally inspired my van-love was without question the VW van. I always wanted one. But I don't think you can get a 4x8 sheet of plywood into a Vanagon. You CAN do it with the Astro. One of the film clips that blew me away near the end was the van front seats that rotated completely around and the drop down table and suddenly -- INSTANT CONFERENCE! That was REALLY cool!
I've always really liked them Dustbusters and have owned more than one. The initial crappy engine/tranny choice ruined the car, but introduction of the 3800 engine with 4-speed OD tranny in 1992 made it a very decent vehicle. And when you look at what the "weird" things were about the Dustbuster: * Massive windshield far away from the driver. Many manufacturers have used similar design - just years later. * Taillights up on the pillars. Haven't we seen a lot of that too? Later, of course. * Glass fibre body. What's wrong with that? It wouldn't dent. It wouldn't rust. It's good enough for sports cars. And it wouldn't let heat through nowhere near as fast as metal. I live in the north, there are real winters here, and when I switch off the engine in a normal car at -20C, i can feel the temperature drop very fast. The Dustbusters body material slows this process down a lot. Same thing happens in reverse on a hot summers day - the Dustbusters are never too hot to enter, even with that black roof... If I could get my hands on a decent 3800 Dustbuster today, I'd buy it in a heartbeat and drive it daily. *** Rant over - thanks for another brilliant episode! 👍
Pontiac version was briefly sold in Europe too, my granny's bro still owns one to this very day and uses it to pull a boat trailer. Even more interestingly, the european spec one comes with a 5-speed manual and a 4 cylinder (likely Opel?) engine.
I ran service calls for a major corporation and used my own vehicles for the first 26 years. In the first 13 of those years I went through 6 vehicles that I bought used. For the next 13 years I drove a 1994 Pontiac Trans Sport with the 3800 that I also bought used. Wonderful vehicle. Small outside but huge amount of interior space. When I finally stopped using it, it had 382 thousand miles on and the engine was still running fine. The transmission was slipping and even though I really would have liked to keep driving it, I couldn't justify the price of a new transmission on a vehicle that old and with as many miles as it had. Since my company paid me for driving it and with it being so reliable, I made money driving it for all those years. It broke my heart when I finally had to let it go. Oh, and with the plastic body, when cleaned up, it still looked new the whole time...
I had a dodge caravan as a company car for years. And owned a Plymouth voyager. Drove it Alaska from Georgia and back… there was no better thing for long trips. Easy to get in and out…comfortable and lots of room. Better than an SUV and much more comfortable and lots of room for kids camping etc. also more affordable
My parents had a Nissan Livina (Brazilian Nissan Note) based on a Renault based on a Dacia (that was the worst 0 km car we had). Before that we always had Station Wagons, Fiat Palio Weekend and Fiat Marea Weekend. Now we have a T-Cross long-wheelbase made in Brazil. #SAVETHEWAGONS
We owned several minivans when our two boys were at home. Seeing one reminds me of practicality, utilitarian, and adventurous. They were all of these things for us.
Peter Lynch said in one of his books that he loaded up on Chrysler stock in the early 80s as they could not lose. They got low interest loans and contract with the government to sell millions of K Cars along with concession from the unions.
The crossover is less space efficient I find, the lack of interior height is the big issue - so the q7 may seat many people but as a car for sticking bikes in and stuff - the floor to ceiling height is so little. It amazes me that fashion can kill a genre that in every way surpassed the utility of its predecessor
Between Minivans and Crossovers/SUV, I much prefer minivans for their practicality, especially if it's a model with 3 rows of seats. Also, minivans have much better ingress in the rear, making them perfect for young families. Fun fact also: many of the Canadian broadcasters, like CBC, use minivans to transport their video equipment to go film on site.
In my opinon you should have mentioned the first mazda mpv, They came out only 2 or so years after the Chrysler's very first Minivan. Aaaand the 4x4 Version is a true Offroader.
It was actually more like four or five years after the Chryslers and, I would argue, it was the first modern crossover. Think about it: -Modified passenger car platform (the HC-series 929/Luce) -Relatively long and flat hood (by minivan standards), something that became even more apparent with the 1995 facelift -Conventionally hinged rear door(s) (not a novelty in Europe or Asia, but very rare in the North American market) -The aforementioned 4WD option (and it was a true 4WD system with a locking center diff)
I remember the Trans Sport had the impact resistant doors. They worked but could still got scratches and gouges. Back then, plastics were still new to the autobody industry and a means to make repairs to them from local shops ranged from " leave it alone," to " It won't last." A lot of catching up and self learning was done. Which reminds me: the plastics used back then were below par to begin with. Dashboards always cracked. Now they are more resistant.
@@Michelle-Eden ffs, different english dialects have different spellings for certain words, "tire" being one. the above commenter is probably from a commonwealth country ("tyre" = british spelling) , let them be
@@Michelle-Eden Tires? become fatigued? , hehehe. Herb has a "H" at the beginning and there is a "L" in solder..... but lets not get bogged down with who knows how to English language better eh?
The story of Chinese matket Buick GL8 minivan deserves its own episode. It's fascinating how the Chevy Venture escaped the American minivan extinction and continued its life till today across the pacific.
I went to Tokyo on business in 1982 and saw Toyota and Mitsubishi minis everywhere. When I got home I told my wife about them and how I thought they'd be really popular over here. Voila, 1983 Chrysler changed the industry. Drove a Pontiac TranSport while our kids were young and thought it was a pretty good vehicle. The 3 liter six was responsive and gave pretty good fuel economy and the seats were all individual and removable for amazing flexibility
My family has owned two Honda Odyssey over my lifetime, still got 2016 going strong, I learned to drive in it and it's actually quite fun, that V6 is no slouch. Gonna miss minivans when they eventually die out in the North America
I've owned 2 minivans. 1998 Caravan $18,000 (same as a mid-priced sedan), lasted over 200,000 miles and traded in for a 2015 Grand Caravan $21,000. A lot of vehicle for the money and very comfortable. Not a great driving experience, per se, but I don't worry about it like I would some fancy car or expensive SUV or pickup.
I always heard that it was Mitsubishi that actually invented the minivan and sold that concept Chrysler from which the rest of the world gained its knowledge and experience!!! 🤠👍
As someone who has owned a 1999 Grand Espace and drove it for nearly 200,000 km, I'll go for a Minivan again, but not for a SUV. SUVs are Minivans with skin cancer, having completely useless swellings, chrome atrocities and a surface that lets a rocky coast look like a smooth landscape in comparison.
Thankfully I did not spend my youth in the back of a minivan. I had my license by 1985. My youth was spent in late 60's muscle and mid 70's personal luxury.
I’ve been in love with minivans and wagons sense I was a kid and I’ve owned a few of each. Always economical and practical and what most people don’t realize is with the right make model and trim are a blast to drive.
I had a Lumina APV for a few years. I don't know where you heard the engine was "lackluster". Mine had the 3.8, making the whole thing surprisingly fast. 10.6 sec 0-60 from what I found online.
I have a 2006 Sienna and it is still our daily driver. It has been the most reliable vehicle I’ve ever had but it is starting to succumb to the harsh climate and road salt here in Canada. I didn’t want to get a minivan but after our second child was born my wife insisted we needed one. Shortly after we bought it I was convinced because not only is it practical but also very comfortable for long road trips.
Ed that was excellent!!! I love these videos. I watch them over and over! Last night for example, i watched, the muscle car, rise and fall of cadillac (which i believe will drag on for years to come) and the edsel episode. I was totally thrilled to wake up to the mini can today! Thank you again, Dustbusters!
My Father owned two VW Kombis! The First Brand new in 1973! That Vehicle took ! Two adults, Two children, Two dogs, one cat, Two rabbits and two Hamster from Long Island New York to Pittsburgh PA! He Owned IT Till 1990! Ok! Ok! He put an electric heater on the dash and kept a hand ice scraper nearby! My Dream Vehicle is Still A Type 2 In any Variant! I Remember when Chrysler came out with the Dual Sliding doors!? Saying how they Invented the Easy access? VS Did it in the 1940-1950's! Also the AWD! VW had it with the Syncro Versions in Early 1980's! Just in Looks Alone! The Chevy Astro wAs a Mini Van?! Looked just like it's bigger version! Thanks For Sharing This Video
Hahaha I like how the beginning shot with the van pulling out of the garage.. and the wood paneling on the van looks like it matches the house.. like you're just driving part of your house around
Shoutout to my boy DKW for making the Schnellaster, which is also a contender for a game of 'Who was the first?'
Somewhere on the net I saw a short video about the first ride of the original Daimler: Mrs. Daimler drove it (not Mr. ) with her kids & stuff to visit granma, so if you apply purpose as classification rule, the first car was a minivan.
@@foreyfriend145 @Forey Friend
@@foreyfriend145 Uhmmmm actually it was Mrs Benz.
HELLO EAR 🦻
It's funny to me that automakers are currently shoehorning 3rd row seating into every crossover. The 3-row crossover is the vehicle people buy when they say, "But I don't want a minivan!" The crossover wants to be a minivan, but is worse in every measurable metric.
Correct. VANity is a terrible thing!
Your absolutely right here even worse if someone buys just a front wheel drive crossover. It's like what's the point? Sure ok, by default the minivan isn't a sports car or anything sexy... but how many SUVs fit that bill let alone look unique? Nearly every SUV just kinda looks the same. At least the minivan market is unique enough that you can easily tell the difference between a Honda and a Chrysler with different ride dynamics to boot. Most SUVs just kinda look and drive the same. I think that will only get worse once everything is electric. They'll all share the same platforms and drivetrains. You watch and some call the minivan boring... lol.
Or is it the other way around? That Minivans want to be crossovers or SUVS first chanche they get?
@@EdsAutoReviews Some automakers keep trying to make their minivans more "Crossover-like" in an attempt to make them appeal to the CUV crowd. I don't think it ever really works though. GM tried it when they stapled a new longer "truck-like" nose onto their Venture and Montana vans and changed the names.
@@EdsAutoReviews Well the 2005 Chevy uplander definitely tries. It's got a long snout, and c pillar but that thing ain't fooling anyone. It's a face lifted Chevy Venture with less amenities. Think of simple things like cup holders in the doors, the Uplander doesn't even have that. Just an optional tray and two in dash cup holders. That's it. Believe it or not. Even the Venture gave you one in each door and if you want to talk about the lack of power the 3500 v6 that unfortunately graced these things runs out of steam almost as fast a Yugo. Rides like one too. Even in it's high end, heated leather seat configuration the thing absolutely rides like a drunken horse. Having that huge snout doesn't help parking any either. GM basically gave it the worst features of a minivan with the worst features of an SUV.. to make matters worse it doesn't add anything to the package. Even the Ford Freestar offered fold down to the floor seats! The Chevy Uplander? Nope. You can't even easily enter the 3rd row without snagging your clothing on some metal seat frame! Some might knock the Mercedes Benz vans for It's flaws, but that thing was designed to be a cargo van, not a passenger van so of course it lacks the features one might expect of one. Again this was a 2005 model, it was almost laughable that GM tried selling this. Clearly they didn't put much effort or time to consider what the market wanted out of a family hauler. The only good point I can say about it is the overhead DVD rail system is fairly nifty if you can get beyond the silly 6 inch screen and cheap plastics. It might have been GM at its worst, but this couldn't even pull off being a cargo van let alone some cushy crossover. It's clear to see why GM doesn't bother making minivans anymore. It's best attempt was as boring as unpainted dry wall and it's worst was an laughable pot belly pig or a dust buster.
Still driving an almost 18 year old Toyota Sienna. More practical and economical than any similar size SUV. Best vehicle I have ever owned.
My mom has hers and honestly that thing is probably the single most practical car my family has ever owned
I worked at a Dodge dealership in the 1980s, and our Dodge Caravan out sold everything and I still think it is the best vehicle ever made.
Chrysler quality was unbeatable
I drive a '95 Chrysler minivan. It can haul longer items than most pickup trucks - which often require the use of a trailer.
If you have a 2003 Toyota Sienna, you’re lucky, it’s a large minivan. Siennas now are huge!
A happy customer!
We recently rented a new Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid to drive across the US twice. We first balked at having to drive a minivan thousands of miles. We were pleasantly surprised at how well it was appointed, how incredibly practical is was, how fuel efficient it was and how well it drove at nearly triple digit speeds for hours on end. It really had us rethinking the while minivan proposition.
“Easy on the marketing there chief!” 😂 Fantastic episode.
Thanks!
There are new, imported Japanese minivans here in Australia, because some come from the factory with a wheelchair lift or ramp. Cars can be imported here no matter their age if there is no similar vehicle sold domestically, its often cheaper than doing conversions too.
There are plenty of grey import vans here. I love the look of the Nissan and Toyota's, low, fat & wide with tinted windows, too much chrome and alloy wheels to match...
Interesting! There are a few companies in the U.S. that do minivan conversions for ramps or lifts, but no vans are sold from the factory that way. I think the conversion companies work with the automakers to develop a standard process for the conversions, though.
Also in the Uk we have imported previas etc
@@DrJatzCrackers Nissan nomad?
So much of NZ and Australia's second hand car market are just grey imports from Japan. It's kinda crazy if you stop and think about the ammount of vehicles.
The way I understood Chrysler’s development of the minivan came from Lee Iococca during his tenure at Ford. They were working on the minivan concept for the US market which was shot down by upper management. There was tension between Lee and the CEO of Ford and when Lee was fired he took the concept with him. That and the K car saved Chrysler with government supported bailout funds.
K car allowed them to pay them back hella early.
That's true. Lee and Henry Ford II didn't get along well.
So Lee got fired in the late 70s and took some of the talent behind the Ford Carrousel concept back to Chrysler.
Not only Chrysler paid their debt in advance, they got so much money reserves they were able to purchase AMC, Lamborghini and release new platforms and powertrains after a decade of solely developing K-Car based vehicles.
Some people may still think Chrysler Corporation's best era was the 60s to early 70s, but financially speaking the mid 80s to mid 90s were even better. Unfortunately, we all know what happened after that...
Lee had the scope of how important modular design and platform sharing was in a soft market
@@duncandmcgrath6290 To a ridiculous point. Remember the Le Baron charriot ? With "Corynthian" leather ? 🤣
@@luisinhoens90 Not so in the 70's oil crisis. They only had V8 gas guzzlers, dated cars. They then slapped together the ominious Dodge Omni (!) and sold rebadged Diamond Star cute but crappy cars.
11:52 It is a sad commontary on the way that Peugeot had damaged Citroen that the latter found anything "too risky". I mean this was the company that gambled on front wheel drive in the 1930s, that started engineering work on the French answer to the Ford Model T in the 1930s, and created the spaceship like DS with hydropneumatic suspension. The idea that they could consider any concept "too risky" is sad.
I get that but on the other hand it was exactly this behaviour which nearly resulted in the collapse of Citroën in the form of the SM. Without Peugeot we wouldn’t have Citroën…
Thank you so much for mentioning the Scout Scarab. Most people just completely ignore the earlier parts of history that later had a comeback. Early electric cars, for example where almost completely forgotten. At the start of the video I was talking to my screen saying, "Please mention the Scarab," Thank you again. Great video.
Most car designers and design historians would say that the Scarab was the first Minivan.
I love the Scarab. What a completely awesome and unique design.
I just watched a 20 minute video on minivans and I don't regret it one bit. Eds ability to tell a story is so good I'm sure he can make a story about paint drying
"On the next episode of Ed's Auto Reviews... watch me watching paint dry!"
@@EdsAutoReviews like I said, I will gladly watch
One, to me, interesting aspect of the minivan when it first arrived in the United States. For regulatory reasons, which is a nice way of saying the automotive industry got what they wanted, they were considered light trucks and not as passenger vehicles even though the Chrysler was built on a front wheel drive passenger car platform. This not only let them have a higher fuel consumption allowance, but, also meant they did not have to meet the more stringent passenger car crash and safety standards. So, you have a vehicle specifically designed and marketed to carry families with young children that did not meet the more stringent, even then, safety standards of the time. If you can find me something more screwed up than that I'd like to hear it. This definitely cost lives.
@Kirk Wolfe i'm sorry who suggested something like that? Certainly not me. I think perhaps you're projecting. Or perhaps something else
@Kirk Wolfe Go to any SCCA event. You'd be surprised what gets raced.
School buses? Hard walls and floors, no seatbelts or safety devices of any kind.
@@jimjamauto you are quite wrong. School buses have been crash tested all the way back into the 1930s. Despite your uninformed opinion, they are extremely safe. Very hard to find an example of a child being killed while on one
@Kirk Wolfe Chrysler offered a turbo manual trans mini van for a while.
We owned a steady progression of Dodge and Plymouth minivans for our growing, young family throughout the 2000’s and 2010’s. They were just what we needed.
I am currently still using my parent's old 2002 Chrysler Voyager as a commuter. It's decent on gas, fits in most parking spaces, plenty of room for my tools, and I don't care if it gets dinged up in a crowded parking garage.
My mom uses a late 90's plymouth voyager. It's on its last legs, but considering how she treats it, it's doing well.
@@henryfleischer404 (update) Just after posting the original comment I had an accident with it and had to retire it. 😀 I just replaced it with a 2015 Grand Caravan. All the newer minivans regardless of brand are the same length. About a foot and a half longer than the ol' Voyager. I'd prefer the more compact size.
“Especially their mother, well.. because family”
Dominic toretto would be proud.
11:19 that looks fairly similar to the Land Rover Discovery, excluding the front end. The cars were decades apart, but it's still interesting, seeing the similarities.
Yep, it looks nice. We never had those in Canada.
Indeed. Always it looks like some kind of land to to rover
Great Episode, absolutely love the 1980s part! From European perspective, one might want to add two significant compact minivans which i was kind of missing in this video:
The Volkswagen Touran, a compact version of the Sharan, being continously successful in Europe, more than 2.5 million units being sold since 2003
The Dacia Jogger, a budget 7seater minivan introduced in 2022, a clear sign this segment is not dead
Ahh, the Caravan. The perfect family driving pod. My son is still using our 2005. Stow-and-go seating, a sliding door on each side, and 300,000 km on the odometer. Starting to rust now but still going strong.
I love the video. As an American of a certain age I live through all of this. Couple of bits of trivia. In the mid 80s the Japanese also saw this phenomenon and decided to compete in the United States. Toyota first, then Nissan and Mitsubishi, brought over there Japanese vans to the US. Both passenger and cargo versions. These were one box Cabover real wheel drive designs. I think the Toyota version sold OK for a while but then interest disappeared. They really weren't competitive in the US market because of their size and power. Not to mention they looked like complete death traps in the front.
These days Chrysler sells a minivan in the United States, along with Honda, Kia and of course, Toyota. The new sienna is a complete re-design and only sold as a hybrid. It cells pretty well
I remember those 1980s mid-engined Japanese vans...friend of mine in college had the Toyota Van. I also recall the Nissan Van was prone to engine fires and eventually Nissan bought all of them back from customers
And the Plymouth vans and K cars were CHEAP!
@@chrisfreemesser5707 A guy I knew with a Toyota van used to drive it like Dan Gurney at the Indy 500. The bumper only being a foot in front of the driver always worried me.
Knew a guy who bought the Chrysler van with every option. Nothing worked right. Don't know what he did with it.
I was a parts driver for a So. CA Toyota dealership in 89-90, Had this van as one of our delivery vehicles. Fun to drive as I recall, but in the cargo van configuration it had poor visibility to the rear and large blind spots.
The Nissan Prairie (sold as the "Multi" in Canada and the Stanza Wagon in the US) was the first vehicle sold here that had sliding doors on both sides. The follow up "Axxess" also had sliding doors on both sides. It would be a while longer before any of the US made minivans got sliding doors on both sides - I don't know why considering that it's a pretty obvious idea. I think these could both be considered minivans, but neither had a real third row option (just side or rear facing jump seats in the back).
Doors on one side assume that parking will be along a street so the door is opposite the drivers position.
@@bobroberts2371 which makes perfect sense for a cargo van or large passenger van. But for minivans two sliding doors makes more sense - note that they all have them now.
Always looked leaky and faulty to me, especially the powered ones.
The Prairie not only offered a real third row seat, but also a front 3 seat option, so you could buy an 8 seater Prairie. In fact that was their development principle, being able to sit 8 adults inside. But those models weren't offered in the US or Canada, or many other countries... They only sold in Japan, Australia and other bunch of countries. And to be fair, the third row may be for Japanese adults, but not for taller people overseas.
I own an 8 seater Prairie and it's great, I don't get why it couldn't be considered a minivan as well as the Chariot that was a 7 seater... And both Prairie and Chariot released before the Voyager and so...
@@rogersmith7396 I have no experience with the powered sliding doors, but my grandparents' minivan doors never leaked. After all, they don't just slide -- when closing, they push in too, much like a regular swinging door.
Great way to start my Sunday
Gold star for including the Scarab, still waiting for Mr. Leno to drive one on his channel.
Good morning Eds! Cheers to the best growing car channel 🙂
I've been driving a Chevy Astro for the last decade and have no plans of replacing it. Great little van!
I grew up in a family that always had a minivan. We still have two! But with most of the kids now adults, myself included, my mom will probably get an SUV or crossover in the near future since she likes the higher ride height
Get her a thick seat cushion.
And the horrific gas milage too...
mine wants to downsize and get a BEV so its cheaper and easier to live with
Interesting. I also grew up in a minivan family and have one for my own family. My elderly parents actually perfect the seat height of the minivan but drives a crossover bc my mom prefers smaller vehicles. My dad usually drives my minivan to shuttle my kids even tho his suv is much fancier. He (as do I) love the versatility and functionality of the minivan.
@@Wasabi9111 mom had a chevy 2004~ blazer before this but it was costing to much to fuel/running costs ect and before that was a Oldsmobile hard-top/4-door cuttly but her excuse was is it didn't fit her single party/drunk moms needs but she's more historically a GT car buyer and would likely go back to that or a sports car or mini truck aka something like the ford ranger but all electric as now days she loves gardening something about being therapeutic and or keeping her out of trouble with the law ect
We loved our minivans. we put on lots of miles on family road trips and vacation. First a Chrysler caravan, then a ford windstar. Loved them both.
I recently bought a new Pacifica hybrid for my family and love it. I traded in a 2013 Mercedes ML 550 for it and honestly, the Pacifica is so much better to live with. Who cares that it's not "cool".
Most people.
The right attitude makes any car cool, well almost
POOR Chrysler american quality sell it fast
@@juansanchez-rm6wc I think he'll be fine. He's gotten used to poor quality. I mean, M-B ML...
My first car was a misubishi expo lrv, a usdm short wheelbase chariot. It was awesome. Good to see it referenced anywhere, even briefly! Great job as always Ed.
When the Chrysler minivan came out I had a wife, daughter, son, dog,and cat. I was conciering a station wagon but did not want to feed the fuel consuption they were noted for. It lasted for 13 years and I concider it the best automotive investment I ever made.
I've owned a number - Caravan..Voyager..Silhouette..GMC Safari (Same as Chev Astro). I loved the Safari. It was built on the S10 pickup platform and as such had a full frame. Really great tow capacity.
My parents got a Dodge Grand Caravan when I was young. It really was just like a tall spacious car. I remember liking the wedge look of the Transport but my dad went with the Dodge which was a good call in hindsight.
Had friend whose parents had a Ford Aerostar. What a hunk of junk. It definitely felt like a van: tall and wobbly; felt like you were in a metal box as opposed to a car.
Don’t tell anyone, but my Town and Country is the most practical vehicle I have ever owned. Other than being made as cheap as possible, it have been very reliable and good for everything from getting wood, going camping, hauling kids and people.
When my wife and I were expecting child #4 in 2006 it was decided to -upgrade- buy a minivan, a 06 Grand Caravan. For all the fun I poke at it, it's been good. Still have it. In fact, yesterday it turned over 299K miles. From Texas, it's taken us as far south as Monterey Mexico and as far north as Indianapolis Indiana.
My most memorable as a child minivan in my family is the Plymouth Grand Voyager, Ford Aerostar and the Ford Windstar
I think the GM W platform has an interesting story behind it, lost a lot of money. Would be an interesting topic some time.
yes, The Buick GL8 is a rather fascinating extension of it for example.
As an aging life-long American car guy, I've really enjoyed your videos. One quibble with the last bit of this one, though. I've lived and worked in China off and on for a long time (decades). China is *NOT* undergoing a new baby boom. But the minivan is definitely a thriving car type there. One of it's primary applications is short-haul business transport (to and from meetings in the same city, between nearby cities, picking people up from the airport, etc.). Upscale (even "tuner") customized minivans are part of the stable of personal cars maintained by wealthy Chinese for moving their large entourages of lackeys, yes-men and mistresses around. But no baby boom.
Instant like))
Ed, I’m always waiting your new videos so much!
My friends mom had a Dodge Caravan Turbo Manual 5-speed back in the day.
We used to borrow it a lot to cruise around town in. What she didn't know is that before we would leave, we would take out all the seats except the front two seats.
The van was a total sleeper. Even the cops were surprised when we would pull away from Mustangs from stoplight to stoplight.
The van became sort of a thing that summer. Beige with wood panel and a little Turbo badge on the side.
Bravo on this, Mr. Ed! It really is kind of sad to see the minivan fade away into history. My parents had a handful of them while I was growing up.. a ‘92 Previa, ‘00 Ford Windstar, ‘04 Honda Odyssey and a couple Mid ‘00’s Caravans that faithfully carted us around and tolerated my first-time-driver antics 😆🙈 Don’t know if it’s been done already, but you should look into the history of the small pickup with all of its ups/downs!
Alphard/Vellfire and the Lexus LM...
Looks hideous from outside but damn the interior is like Rolls Royce living room on wheels.
Needs a British butler serving tea.
In my country, you will be mocked if you drive those car, you had to have a driver
To add to the story. The Ford Aerostar and GM Astro minivans were front engine/rear drive vehicles based on small/mid-sized car platforms. The Ford version had terrible problems with weak automatic transmissions. Ford later shifted their minivan to the FWD Taurus car platform and named it the Windstar. GM also offered a second generation minivan, like with Ford's Windstar with FWD and based on mid-sized/large size car platforms. Sadly too the Chrysler/Dodge/Plymouth minivans have had problems with their automatic transmissions during much of their run until the last 10 years or so. Chrysler/Dodge, Honda and Toyota minivans are still sold here in the USA and Canada, mainly to large families.
The Astro and Safari were Mid Size Vans not mini vans, they were 18% smaller than the full size G Series vans of the time and shared much of their under pinnings with the S10 and S10 Blazer. The big difference with the Astro and Safari besides their size is that at the end of the day, they were designed to be a smaller G Series with creature comforts not found in a van, the Caravan, Lumina MPV, Winstar, Venture/Transport/Montana, and Uplander/Montana SV6 were from day one MPVs, meant to be people haulers with extra cargo space. Basically Astros are at the end of the day still light trucks and based on a commercial vehicle platform, where as the Caravan was a K Car with a Van body
I see lots of Japanese minivans.
My parents were given their cousin’s Aerostar. Yo me it was the most MPV like Espace style American vehicle.
We had an 86 Astro in blue and later mom traded it in and got a 2000 Astro in dark grey. They were excellent vehicles. Wish they still made them now!
I remember my mom buying one of the first Plymouth caravans that came out. People (mainly adults with children) were constantly wanting to see what this new vehicle was all about. I was starting to drive and I’d load up friends on the weekends for fishing, football games, and heading toward the beach. There wasn’t a stigma attached to it when it first came out.
The Previa was offered in the US with AWD, a turbo and a manual. The Aerostar and Caravan were also available with manuals. The Caravan could also be bought with a turbo.
The minivan is a very useful vehicle for those who are handicapped. The sliding driver side door can hold wheelchairs or other mobility aids while the owner can still use the driver entrance. The scarcity of these models will make it harder for the disabled to get adequate transportation.
Had a real good laugh about the Fiat Useless, love it xD. Ford and VW discontinuing their mv's is not quiet right. Here in Europe VW still offers the Sharan and the smaller Touran while Ford still offers the Galaxy, S-Max and C-Max (Edit: and even the B-Max). Same thing with the Focus and Fiesta.
Ford is selling those in Europe? They don't currently sell any of those models in the U.S. here Only SUV's, trucks, the Mustang, and SUV Mustang
@@danielpassigmailcom Yes thats right. Thats because its allways about that type of "big" cars in the U.S. There seems to be not enough demand/ profit margin for "small cars" except when there are crises and/ or you can't effort to buy anything but small fuel efficient cars.
While here in Europe the trend is going towards SUV's and Crossovers too they are even smaller than what you guys would consider "compact" or "small". Just look at the 2014 EcoSport or 2019 Puma from Ford or the 2017 T-Roc, 2018 T-Cross and 2021 Taigo from VW. They are offered alongside the Fiesta/Focus and UP/Polo/Golf .
A coworker bought a Dodge Caravan in early 84, with wood paneling on the sides. We all came out to look at this strange creature. After only a few minutes we were convinced that despite its shortcomings (sliding door only on one side and lackadaisical power) it was a true game changer.
Thank you Ed, for the Wagoneer nod! They're quite the item... currently.
Thanks for another brilliantly well thought out and edited video. You’ve temporarily made minivans ‘cool’… well maybe not cool … but rather ‘interesting’ again. Cheers!
I owned a 96 Caravan, loved it, perfect family car. ...
I think as a precursor you should also consider the "so much obscure you didn't noticed it existed" 1914 A.L.F.A. (later Alfa-Romeo) 40/60 HP Aerodinamica which is more aerodynamic than the CGV and very much a monovolume
Thanks! I will touch on this in a future video about the early aerodynamic cars.
@@EdsAutoReviewsgotta love some early aero
Nice to see you include the old British Commer, always thought it was a cute and friendly shape (also liked the Bedford van). Would like more songs in future videos! ;)
The fact you recalled the Lancia Megagamma is pretty much remarkable
And by the way, it is the FIAT Ulysse, not useless.
And the Zafira still exists, even if it called Zafira Life and it is just the passenger version of the Vivaro, related to the Citroen Jumpy and its twins.
I don't like the way Stellantis is going. It seems all of their vans and some other cars are suddenly replaced by Peugeots, while both Opel and FIAT had nicer platforms and more innovative engineering. You can recognise the Peugeot platform very quickly from one of the symptoms of its idiotic budget design: a noticeable pause after you press the horn. You can almost get out the calendar, count the weeks until impact, have the collision and only then the horn will warn the other traffic. I haven't tested the latest Peugeot or Opel Astra for the way they drive but I severely disliked the handling of some modernish mid range Peugeots. Let's hope they at least improved on that.
The DustBusters bit was awesome and singing was great!
I recently traded my Dodge Grand Caravan for a Ram 1500 crew cab. Essentially I sacrificed the 3rd row seat for a truck bed, but both vehicles have the same engine (albeit the truck has been tuned to 305 hp vs 285 hp in the van). Overall where I live in the US, a truck is much more versatile for what my needs are than a minivan now.
& always a bitch trying to find a pick up truck when you need one, better to own one.
Aaaah, the same engine ?? A 5 liter Hemi in a mini van ? I doubt that...
@@marcryvon 3.6L V6 in both
@@marcryvon never heard of a V6 RAM?
@@mental_modeler2952you could get a pen to star V6 in the base model RAM until this year I believe
Great video, Ed. I was once the proud owner of a Dodge Grand Caravan... and adorned with genuine imitation woodgrain siding. Oh, those were the days. Really enjoy your videos and thanks for all the work you put into these videos for us.
Good News.
A new video from Ed!!!!
I love my Caravan. Smooth ride and lots of cargo space. Especially going to the lumber yard for picking up 4 x 8 sheets of plywood
Yup, luv that most pick ups can’t claim that.
Great video mate! Always love your content, Ed!
I had a '92 Aerostar that was perfect for my family of four kids and at least one dog. When the SUV's came out, my thoughts were (and still are), "What -- we're going back to the station wagons we grew up with in the 60's and 70's?"
Trends are cyclic
How can Chrysler be so inventive yet always dying
Because in general their cars don't last as long as some other brands
The question is are they really innovative these days? Apart from the Chrysler Airflow Concept and the Pacifica and Pacifica PHEV, they're not doing much. The Voyager is a Pacifica with less options at a cheaper price, and the 300 is outsold by the Dodge Charger and Challenger because they decided to drop the SRT8 for the North American market. I really hope they get innovative again so they don't go bankrupt again.
Its what they do. The 50s tailfin cars rusted out in about two years and no one would be caught dead in one after 4 years. Their muscle cars were completely over the top.
@@alphatrion100 So far my Jeep appears to be very good quality. Fingers crossed.
@@rogersmith7396
And you should just enjoy it.
But personally i wouldn't keep a fiat/chrysler product for too many miles. I think its common knowledge by now most of their engines dont reach toyota mileages without problems.
I really enjoyed that! I have been an owner of a 1996 and 2003 Astrovan (currently), and I love em. Arguably the largest mini-van available. I have put considerable money into upkeep. I use it for both family AND business -- the making and delivery of doors. The Astro is irreplaceable. It is the perfect, perfect size for me. I wish somebody else would make something like it! If my Astro blew up, I wouldn't know what to replace it with. And its looks are incredible.
What originally inspired my van-love was without question the VW van. I always wanted one. But I don't think you can get a 4x8 sheet of plywood into a Vanagon. You CAN do it with the Astro.
One of the film clips that blew me away near the end was the van front seats that rotated completely around and the drop down table and suddenly -- INSTANT CONFERENCE! That was REALLY cool!
Sooooo wish they still made Astros! growing up we had an 86 and then a 2000.
I've always really liked them Dustbusters and have owned more than one.
The initial crappy engine/tranny choice ruined the car, but introduction of the 3800 engine with 4-speed OD tranny in 1992 made it a very decent vehicle.
And when you look at what the "weird" things were about the Dustbuster:
* Massive windshield far away from the driver. Many manufacturers have used similar design - just years later.
* Taillights up on the pillars. Haven't we seen a lot of that too? Later, of course.
* Glass fibre body. What's wrong with that? It wouldn't dent. It wouldn't rust. It's good enough for sports cars. And it wouldn't let heat through nowhere near as fast as metal.
I live in the north, there are real winters here, and when I switch off the engine in a normal car at -20C, i can feel the temperature drop very fast. The Dustbusters body material slows this process down a lot. Same thing happens in reverse on a hot summers day - the Dustbusters are never too hot to enter, even with that black roof...
If I could get my hands on a decent 3800 Dustbuster today, I'd buy it in a heartbeat and drive it daily.
***
Rant over - thanks for another brilliant episode! 👍
Pontiac version was briefly sold in Europe too, my granny's bro still owns one to this very day and uses it to pull a boat trailer. Even more interestingly, the european spec one comes with a 5-speed manual and a 4 cylinder (likely Opel?) engine.
I ran service calls for a major corporation and used my own vehicles for the first 26 years. In the first 13 of those years I went through 6 vehicles that I bought used. For the next 13 years I drove a 1994 Pontiac Trans Sport with the 3800 that I also bought used. Wonderful vehicle. Small outside but huge amount of interior space. When I finally stopped using it, it had 382 thousand miles on and the engine was still running fine. The transmission was slipping and even though I really would have liked to keep driving it, I couldn't justify the price of a new transmission on a vehicle that old and with as many miles as it had. Since my company paid me for driving it and with it being so reliable, I made money driving it for all those years. It broke my heart when I finally had to let it go. Oh, and with the plastic body, when cleaned up, it still looked new the whole time...
I had a dodge caravan as a company car for years. And owned a Plymouth voyager. Drove it Alaska from Georgia and back… there was no better thing for long trips. Easy to get in and out…comfortable and lots of room. Better than an SUV and much more comfortable and lots of room for kids camping etc. also more affordable
My parents had a Nissan Livina (Brazilian Nissan Note) based on a Renault based on a Dacia (that was the worst 0 km car we had). Before that we always had Station Wagons, Fiat Palio Weekend and Fiat Marea Weekend. Now we have a T-Cross long-wheelbase made in Brazil. #SAVETHEWAGONS
Back with another great video! Thanks ed!
"based on the Fiat 600"
Shows Fiat 500
Everything fine
We owned several minivans when our two boys were at home. Seeing one reminds me of practicality, utilitarian, and adventurous. They were all of these things for us.
As a gay man, I enjoyed calling minivans "Hetero Haulers" because no gay man with any dignity would have been caught dead in one. 😉
😂
Prius huh?
🤣
wtf that's hilarious
Отличный рассказчик,очень интересно. Огромное спасибо за выпуск! :)
Peter Lynch said in one of his books that he loaded up on Chrysler stock in the early 80s as they could not lose. They got low interest loans and contract with the government to sell millions of K Cars along with concession from the unions.
Remember when minivans came with optional tvs in the head rests? That was luxury. And in a van!
The crossover is less space efficient I find, the lack of interior height is the big issue - so the q7 may seat many people but as a car for sticking bikes in and stuff - the floor to ceiling height is so little. It amazes me that fashion can kill a genre that in every way surpassed the utility of its predecessor
Between Minivans and Crossovers/SUV, I much prefer minivans for their practicality, especially if it's a model with 3 rows of seats. Also, minivans have much better ingress in the rear, making them perfect for young families. Fun fact also: many of the Canadian broadcasters, like CBC, use minivans to transport their video equipment to go film on site.
In my opinon you should have mentioned the first mazda mpv,
They came out only 2 or so years after the Chrysler's very first Minivan.
Aaaand the 4x4 Version is a true Offroader.
It was actually more like four or five years after the Chryslers and, I would argue, it was the first modern crossover.
Think about it:
-Modified passenger car platform (the HC-series 929/Luce)
-Relatively long and flat hood (by minivan standards), something that became even more apparent with the 1995 facelift
-Conventionally hinged rear door(s) (not a novelty in Europe or Asia, but very rare in the North American market)
-The aforementioned 4WD option (and it was a true 4WD system with a locking center diff)
I remember the Trans Sport had the impact resistant doors. They worked but could still got scratches and gouges. Back then, plastics were still new to the autobody industry and a means to make repairs to them from local shops ranged from " leave it alone," to " It won't last." A lot of catching up and self learning was done. Which reminds me: the plastics used back then were below par to begin with. Dashboards always cracked. Now they are more resistant.
We Need A Video On The History Of Tyres
BAH-zil and to-MAH-to rather than BA-zil and to-MA-to, yes, but I draw the line at misspelling tires.
@@Michelle-Eden ffs, different english dialects have different spellings for certain words, "tire" being one. the above commenter is probably from a commonwealth country ("tyre" = british spelling) , let them be
@@Michelle-Eden Tires? become fatigued? , hehehe. Herb has a "H" at the beginning and there is a "L" in solder..... but lets not get bogged down with who knows how to English language better eh?
Fascinating story of the minivan!!! 🙂
The story of Chinese matket Buick GL8 minivan deserves its own episode. It's fascinating how the Chevy Venture escaped the American minivan extinction and continued its life till today across the pacific.
I went to Tokyo on business in 1982 and saw Toyota and Mitsubishi minis everywhere. When I got home I told my wife about them and how I thought they'd be really popular over here. Voila, 1983 Chrysler changed the industry. Drove a Pontiac TranSport while our kids were young and thought it was a pretty good vehicle. The 3 liter six was responsive and gave pretty good fuel economy and the seats were all individual and removable for amazing flexibility
Nice to create something entertaining out of boring cars. 👍🏻
I'll trade you a microphone for a Mount Prospect police car.
As long as the lighter works…
My family has owned two Honda Odyssey over my lifetime, still got 2016 going strong, I learned to drive in it and it's actually quite fun, that V6 is no slouch. Gonna miss minivans when they eventually die out in the North America
The homeless will inhabit them for years to come.
I submit for consideration the unique Dymaxion car a non-production 3 wheeled aerodynamic concept designed by futurist Buckminster Fuller.
I've owned 2 minivans. 1998 Caravan $18,000 (same as a mid-priced sedan), lasted over 200,000 miles and traded in for a 2015 Grand Caravan $21,000. A lot of vehicle for the money and very comfortable. Not a great driving experience, per se, but I don't worry about it like I would some fancy car or expensive SUV or pickup.
“But it’s a Renault, so they got rid of it fast. Good for them.” That made me laugh!
Yeah my mom had one, total pos, bought it new too. I hated it
I always heard that it was Mitsubishi that actually invented the minivan and sold that concept Chrysler from which the rest of the world gained its knowledge and experience!!! 🤠👍
As someone who has owned a 1999 Grand Espace and drove it for nearly 200,000 km, I'll go for a Minivan again, but not for a SUV. SUVs are Minivans with skin cancer, having completely useless swellings, chrome atrocities and a surface that lets a rocky coast look like a smooth landscape in comparison.
And I like this channel a lot. The Dutch no nonsense approach to story telling with some humor. Nice going!
make a episode The History of the SUV
The Aerostar and the 2000s something Grand Caravan were my childhood road trip homes for sure. Spacious and reliable.
Thankfully I did not spend my youth in the back of a minivan. I had my license by 1985.
My youth was spent in late 60's muscle and mid 70's personal luxury.
Mercedes 250 with half a million miles on it for me.
I’ve been in love with minivans and wagons sense I was a kid and I’ve owned a few of each. Always economical and practical and what most people don’t realize is with the right make model and trim are a blast to drive.
I had a Lumina APV for a few years. I don't know where you heard the engine was "lackluster". Mine had the 3.8, making the whole thing surprisingly fast. 10.6 sec 0-60 from what I found online.
We've owned them for decades now. They're perfect for things like hauling kids but also camping.
Many people live in a minivan year round.
@@timothykeith1367 Yeah this is true. They're a lot more roomy and comfortable given the same size compared to an SUV..
Thanks for making these videos man I really enjoy them... You do a great job!
Our 1994 Previa still going strong. Glad we have it, and it is a good little hauler like our previous Subaru Legacy wagons.
I have a 2006 Sienna and it is still our daily driver. It has been the most reliable vehicle I’ve ever had but it is starting to succumb to the harsh climate and road salt here in Canada. I didn’t want to get a minivan but after our second child was born my wife insisted we needed one. Shortly after we bought it I was convinced because not only is it practical but also very comfortable for long road trips.
another great breakdown of automotive history per usual
Ed that was excellent!!! I love these videos. I watch them over and over! Last night for example, i watched, the muscle car, rise and fall of cadillac (which i believe will drag on for years to come) and the edsel episode. I was totally thrilled to wake up to the mini can today! Thank you again, Dustbusters!
Who knew? The boy can sing!!
Thanks for very interesting and very informative videos.
My Father owned two VW Kombis! The First Brand new in 1973! That Vehicle took ! Two adults, Two children, Two dogs, one cat, Two rabbits and two Hamster from Long Island New York to Pittsburgh PA! He Owned IT Till 1990! Ok! Ok! He put an electric heater on the dash and kept a hand ice scraper nearby! My Dream Vehicle is Still A Type 2 In any Variant! I Remember when Chrysler came out with the Dual Sliding doors!? Saying how they Invented the Easy access? VS Did it in the 1940-1950's! Also the AWD! VW had it with the Syncro Versions in Early 1980's! Just in Looks Alone! The Chevy Astro wAs a Mini Van?! Looked just like it's bigger version! Thanks For Sharing This Video
Hahaha
I like how the beginning shot with the van pulling out of the garage.. and the wood paneling on the van looks like it matches the house.. like you're just driving part of your house around