Very good point. It makes so much sense that, of the three secrets revealed to the children, the most mysterious of them did not have any accompanying encouraging and enlightening words from Our Lady? I highly doubt that. She is our Heavenly Mother who comforts and warns her children on earth. What does that say about the church hierarchy to silence the very Queen of heaven and earth? Lord have mercy!
We are an IMPOSBIBLE and stubborn people. Our poor Lady. Imagine how she must feel when we don't listen to her. We're lucky she comes here at all. She loves us with all her heart. We need to do the same for her. Love is a two way street. Our Lady is trying to save our souls, she's not here to lull us. It's unfair to ask our beautiful Lady for comfort. We need to ask and implore for help to OBEY God. We need help with that. Strength to do the right thing in the face of danger and evil, even unto death.
According to Fr Malachi, you can only understand the silence in the top of the Church when you view it, this way. The one to share the secret have lost their faith. They don't believe. They don't fear and obey. There main agenda is themselves and not the Lord's. I heard that John XXIII and Paul VI were part of freemasons. And when you don't fear the Lord, they don't fear to disobey.
What V2 is is the estates general equivalent Louise called in France wich led to him being dethroned,he was warned if he did not consecrate France to the sacred heart and put it in the french flag ,a revolt would occur,wich happened he tried to do the consecration but it was too late ,now the popes refused to consecrate Russia to the immaculate heart ,and the tiara or the Monarchy was abolished for colegeality ,wich is democratic spirit of lawlessness fortold ,it's the french Revolution inside ,the bishop's have the same power as the pope in alot of cases ,both jp2 and especially benadict 16 held on to sovereignty wich they hated , collegiality wich is Gallicanism yes that herasay we must war with , the Church was poisened it seems look at Paul 6 audience hall ,the pope needs 5 signetures to do certain things and change things wich is error , summorum pontificum concerning the Latin mass was exclusive for the Latin mass faithful and Sspx so the pope was free to speak as sovereign as they would.not put such an abomination on the pope as he is sovereign ,so thank God for sspx because if it was just for Novo's ordo he would need signatures,...bros it seems the chains of Peter in the Vatican reliquary have taken significance profound hear this council is unbinding , meaning we don't have to follow it ,yet they took advantage of poor Catholics who didn't know any better , replacing the wording from holy oblation to fruits of the earth work of human hands says it all ,able ...and Jane ...for able offered the first born and Jane the fruits of the earth ,this comes from a Rosicrucian rite of deicide see defeat modernism the diabolical secret of the new mass part 1-2 wow this will chill you to the core honour to father villa who got the info commanded by Pius XII and padre pio , study this video on defeat modernism
A few facts about Fatima: - The first time Sr Lucia mentioned a consecration of Russia was 1929, by which time the Soviet Union had been established for 7 years and communist groups were already entrenched all over the world. - When she said this (in 1929) she said by Our Lady had been requesting a consecration since 1925. Later (in 1940) she wrote a letter to The Pope, in which she started saying that Our Lady had been requesting a consecration since 1917. - The first time Sr Lucia mentioned "a night illumed" was in 1941, three years after the solar storm of 1938. - The first time Sr Lucia mentioned "secrets" was also in 1941. - The first time Sr Lucia ever told the public to do a First Saturday devotion to prevent "a worse war" was 1941, two years after WW2 had already begun. Also, have you ever heard of Maria Dolores Inglese? In 1889 (8 years before Sr Lucia was born) Maria Dolores Inglese began the practice of reparations to the Immaculate Heart of Mary on First Saturdays. The practice was approved by the local bishop, and it spread throughout Europe.
keeping my eye out for anything odd happening in 2025 or 2029 with respect to the 100 year timeline that the King of France was given for the consecration to the Sacred Heart
Great video, even though I do disagree a bit. On a technical point, Lucia dos Santos did not initially join the Carmel. She first became a Dorothean nun and that's what she was when she was ordered to write the Third Secret down. The photo you show of her at 1:53 is her in a Dorothean habit. That is _not_ a Carmelite habit. She only became a Carmelite later. This is purely my own personal opinion, but I am one who does not believe any of what we got in 2000 is genuine. As you mentioned, it was supposed to be released in 1960. The alleged vision is interesting, but there is nothing in it that has anything in particular to do with that year. I believe the whole thing was a pure fabrication. If some of it seems to correspond to other prophecies, what of it? Text can be crafted to give that impression. I believe the real Third Secret is a clear, concise warning about an evil council and changes to the faith caused by corrupt men at the top of the Church. Also, Lucia wrote the Third Secret down but did not originally send it to Rome. For a time it was in the possession of her bishop. Only later did Pius XII ask for it to be brought to him. I've read Pius XII, after the war, began preparatory work on a council in the late 1940's. After a couple years, maybe less, he cancelled it. Why? Was it because he read the true Third Secret and realized the mistake he was making? Speculation? Yes. But I think this is more plausible than what we've been lead to believe. The 2000 "Third Secret" was an attempt to make Fatima go away and shut people up about it. It hasn't worked. In fact, it seems to have had the opposite effect. Nobody believes it because there is simply nothing there that relates to anything happening in 1960, so it doesn't make sense. It's purposefully ambiguous, like 'plausible deniability'. You can't actually pin anything down to 1960. You can't prove it and you can't disprove it. The real Third Secret wouldn't be like that. It's a serious warning about real events and real people. It wouldn't mince words. If the Secret was supposed to be revealed in 1960 because by then it would be "clear", then it must be concretely relatable to things people would've recognized immediately. And if the Secret is what I think it is, it would also have been painful for John XXIII to read, realizing to go forward with his council meant defying the Mother of God and plunging the Church into chaos because he preferred his own agenda.
"In Portugal, the dogmas of the faith will always be kept etcetra etcetra..." The answer lies in that "etcetra etcetra" I reckon. the faith will be kept in the children? In a remnant? In a particular county? Who knows?
Of course it was, Portugal is no longer a catholic country and 99% of Portuguese are either atheist or non praticing chatolics, meaning they are not really catholics. However i live in Fatima and i see how people from all over the world flock over here, theres an FSSPX and a FSSP parish here, so its a religious center and alot can grow from here.
There's no such thing as "our Lady of Mount Carmel", "our Lady of GuadaLupe", "our Lady of Good Success", "our Lady of LaSalette", "our Lady of "fátima"", et cetera. EXAMPLE 1! The apostate Peter the Hermit started the invention of the rosary. The apostate AntiSaint Domingo Félix de Guzmán invented the scapular. The apostate AntiSaint Simon Stock never even existed. The apostate Dominic of Prussia completed the invention of the rosary in a dream he allegedly had in the 14th century. EXAMPLE 2! The apostate Juan Diego never even existed. I don't know exactly who invented Juan Diego and the "our Lady of GuadaLupe" pseudoapparition. I, however, studied the "our Lady of GuadaLupe" pseudoapparition. I beseech you to closely examine the "our Lady of GuadaLupe" image. The background is lit with scarlet red which represents both the fires and blood of Hell. The woman rise from Mexico apparently in victory after converting the Mexicans not to Christianity but to "pornocratism" which is Latin uncatholicism. There's nothing Queenly or beautiful about the horns which signify AntiKingShip all around the AntiTheoTokos which resemble the horns of wild beasts which are actually attached to her feet as the infant AntiChrist or new AntiChristians lifts her up to signify that the AntiTheoTokos has the diabolical "power" to convert souls to her diabolical AntiQueenShip via diabolical "signs" and "wonders" and pseudomiracles. EXAMPLE 3! Mariana de Jesús Torres claimed TheoTokos Blessedly Saintly Virgin Mother Maria appeared in Quito and said "The Catholic spirit will rapidly decay." which TheoTokos Blessedly Saintly Virgin Mother Maria would've known is a lie because the Christian spirit started to decline when Pope Formosus was assassinated for political reasons in 896. EXAMPLE 4! Melanie Calvat and Maximin Giraud claimed TheoTokos Blessedly Saintly Virgin Mother Maria appeared in LaSalette and said Marseille would crumble into the ground and Paris would burn in 1865 and no such thing ever happened and Rome would lose the Faith and become the Seat of the AntiChrist when TheoTokos Blessedly Saintly Virgin Mother Maria would've known Rome lost the Faith and became the Seat of the AntiChrist when Pope Formosus was assassinated for political reasons in 896. EXAMPLE 5! Lúcia Santos and her cousins Jacinta and Francisco Marto claimed TheoTokos Blessedly Saintly Virgin Mother Maria appeared in "fátima" and claimed the Dogma of the Faith would always be PreServed in Portugal and world war 2 would start under the apostate AntiPope "Pius XI" and pointed the finger at only Russia as if Russia was the only biggest baddest guy and said nothing about post-schism apostate AntiPopes and conciliabulas and all their heresies and apostasies, nothing about apostate Western "europe" eversince 1014, nothing about simony eversince 1012, nothing about desecrations with jew-masonic-Satanic, Egyptian-Greco-Latin pagan, otherwise mythological, otherwise idolatrous, pornographic, otherwise immodest, secular, attempted "representations" of the Father [John 6:46], immodest attempted "representations" of the Son Who Is Risen not Dead [1 Corinthians 15:1-4] e.g. any false ""Christ" "Jesus"" e.g. Cesare Borgia half-naked on a Cross, inaccurate attempted "representations" of the TheoTokos, the Angels, and/or the Saints e.g. a false "Maria" e.g. Giovanna "Vannozza" (dei) Cattanei or white guys in robes passed off "as" the Fathers or artwork of AntiFathers or other AntiSaints, otherwise grotesque images, accurate representations made by unorthodox hands, and other unorthodox images against Churches and Romanesque and Gothic pagan meetinghouses alike eversince 1014, nothing about apostate Rome "corrupting" TheoLogy eversince 1075 and Canon Law eversince 1140, nothing about the jew-masonic-Satanic Divided States of ZombieLand and all her war crimes against humanity eversince 1776, nothing about the jews' inventions of both capitalism and communism, nothing about the United Nations and all her crimes against humanity eversince 1945, nothing about the jew-masonic-Satanic state of PseudoIsrael and all her crimes against humanity eversince 1948, when TheoTokos Blessedly Saintly Virgin Mother Maria would've known Portugal would apostatize even further at "VatiCan 2", the jews were behind all the revolutions, world war 2 would start; not under the apostate AntiPope "Pius XI" whom the AntiMary called a "Pope"; but under the apostate AntiPope "Pius XII", and postmodern Russia's 1 of the least of all the evils in the whole world, all of which TheoTokos Blessedly Saintly Virgin Mother Maria would've known and mentioned and pointed the finger at the jews instead of Russia which leads me to believe Russia will have a big positive thing to do with everything and TheoTokos Blessedly Saintly Virgin Mother Maria would've known the "our Lady of "fatima"" psyop's solar pseudomiracles were nothing more than what scientists call sundogs comparable to the "our Lady of BaySide" pseudoapparition's pseudo pseudomiracles. Show me where in Portugal the Dogma of the Faith Is AlWays Being PreServed. Tell me who. Gimme his name. Gimme his address. Show me what he believes in. This' why Christians don't go outside (Traditional/)Biblical ParaMeters.
You are the one who is deceived. Satan wants you isolated from God, His mother and His Saints. If you are alone then you believe yourself to be good enough to talk directly to God. By denying The Blessed Mother you deny Christ and have chosen Hell.
Mary appeared by way and allowance of Christ himself and His permission. If Christ did not want Mary to appear and give these messages then the Holy Mother would not have appeared. It was all because of Christ. Those who deny and confuse the Mary events seem to be blinded even more so than what they claim us Catholics are.
One of my favorite channels.
Me too!
Very good point. It makes so much sense that, of the three secrets revealed to the children, the most mysterious of them did not have any accompanying encouraging and enlightening words from Our Lady? I highly doubt that. She is our Heavenly Mother who comforts and warns her children on earth. What does that say about the church hierarchy to silence the very Queen of heaven and earth? Lord have mercy!
We are an IMPOSBIBLE and stubborn people. Our poor Lady. Imagine how she must feel when we don't listen to her. We're lucky she comes here at all. She loves us with all her heart. We need to do the same for her. Love is a two way street. Our Lady is trying to save our souls, she's not here to lull us. It's unfair to ask our beautiful Lady for comfort. We need to ask and implore for help to OBEY God. We need help with that. Strength to do the right thing in the face of danger and evil, even unto death.
According to Fr Malachi, you can only understand the silence in the top of the Church when you view it, this way. The one to share the secret have lost their faith. They don't believe. They don't fear and obey. There main agenda is themselves and not the Lord's. I heard that John XXIII and Paul VI were part of freemasons. And when you don't fear the Lord, they don't fear to disobey.
I agree with you. I believe Our Beloved Mother was warning of Vatican ll. From Ireland ☘️
Great presentation and insight.💗 Your channel!
Happy New Year! Thank you for the excellent videos.
Excellent presentation.
What V2 is is the estates general equivalent Louise called in France wich led to him being dethroned,he was warned if he did not consecrate France to the sacred heart and put it in the french flag ,a revolt would occur,wich happened he tried to do the consecration but it was too late ,now the popes refused to consecrate Russia to the immaculate heart ,and the tiara or the Monarchy was abolished for colegeality ,wich is democratic spirit of lawlessness fortold ,it's the french Revolution inside ,the bishop's have the same power as the pope in alot of cases ,both jp2 and especially benadict 16 held on to sovereignty wich they hated , collegiality wich is Gallicanism yes that herasay we must war with , the Church was poisened it seems look at Paul 6 audience hall ,the pope needs 5 signetures to do certain things and change things wich is error , summorum pontificum concerning the Latin mass was exclusive for the Latin mass faithful and Sspx so the pope was free to speak as sovereign as they would.not put such an abomination on the pope as he is sovereign ,so thank God for sspx because if it was just for Novo's ordo he would need signatures,...bros it seems the chains of Peter in the Vatican reliquary have taken significance profound hear this council is unbinding , meaning we don't have to follow it ,yet they took advantage of poor Catholics who didn't know any better , replacing the wording from holy oblation to fruits of the earth work of human hands says it all ,able ...and Jane ...for able offered the first born and Jane the fruits of the earth ,this comes from a Rosicrucian rite of deicide see defeat modernism the diabolical secret of the new mass part 1-2 wow this will chill you to the core honour to father villa who got the info commanded by Pius XII and padre pio , study this video on defeat modernism
how long is Vatican 2 holding the full Third Secret of Fatima?
Great video, just wondering why you used the fake sister Lucy in your pic?
Sister Lucia JPII fulfilled the consecration of Russia to Mary in 1984
No he didn't
No
A few facts about Fatima:
- The first time Sr Lucia mentioned a consecration of Russia was 1929, by which time the Soviet Union had been established for 7 years and communist groups were already entrenched all over the world.
- When she said this (in 1929) she said by Our Lady had been requesting a consecration since 1925. Later (in 1940) she wrote a letter to The Pope, in which she started saying that Our Lady had been requesting a consecration since 1917.
- The first time Sr Lucia mentioned "a night illumed" was in 1941, three years after the solar storm of 1938.
- The first time Sr Lucia mentioned "secrets" was also in 1941.
- The first time Sr Lucia ever told the public to do a First Saturday devotion to prevent "a worse war" was 1941, two years after WW2 had already begun.
Also, have you ever heard of Maria Dolores Inglese?
In 1889 (8 years before Sr Lucia was born) Maria Dolores Inglese began the practice of reparations to the Immaculate Heart of Mary on First Saturdays. The practice was approved by the local bishop, and it spread throughout Europe.
keeping my eye out for anything odd happening in 2025 or 2029 with respect to the 100 year timeline that the King of France was given for the consecration to the Sacred Heart
Akita happened just half way to 2029!
Why would a universal system with no secrets though suddenly have secrets?
I can get mysteries such as the Trinity and all, but secrets?
Thank you
Are you going to talk about the recent passing of Benedict XVI because a lot of people are saying is the truth pope?
Great video, even though I do disagree a bit. On a technical point, Lucia dos Santos did not initially join the Carmel. She first became a Dorothean nun and that's what she was when she was ordered to write the Third Secret down. The photo you show of her at 1:53 is her in a Dorothean habit. That is _not_ a Carmelite habit. She only became a Carmelite later.
This is purely my own personal opinion, but I am one who does not believe any of what we got in 2000 is genuine. As you mentioned, it was supposed to be released in 1960. The alleged vision is interesting, but there is nothing in it that has anything in particular to do with that year. I believe the whole thing was a pure fabrication. If some of it seems to correspond to other prophecies, what of it? Text can be crafted to give that impression. I believe the real Third Secret is a clear, concise warning about an evil council and changes to the faith caused by corrupt men at the top of the Church.
Also, Lucia wrote the Third Secret down but did not originally send it to Rome. For a time it was in the possession of her bishop. Only later did Pius XII ask for it to be brought to him. I've read Pius XII, after the war, began preparatory work on a council in the late 1940's. After a couple years, maybe less, he cancelled it. Why? Was it because he read the true Third Secret and realized the mistake he was making? Speculation? Yes. But I think this is more plausible than what we've been lead to believe.
The 2000 "Third Secret" was an attempt to make Fatima go away and shut people up about it. It hasn't worked. In fact, it seems to have had the opposite effect. Nobody believes it because there is simply nothing there that relates to anything happening in 1960, so it doesn't make sense. It's purposefully ambiguous, like 'plausible deniability'. You can't actually pin anything down to 1960. You can't prove it and you can't disprove it. The real Third Secret wouldn't be like that. It's a serious warning about real events and real people. It wouldn't mince words. If the Secret was supposed to be revealed in 1960 because by then it would be "clear", then it must be concretely relatable to things people would've recognized immediately. And if the Secret is what I think it is, it would also have been painful for John XXIII to read, realizing to go forward with his council meant defying the Mother of God and plunging the Church into chaos because he preferred his own agenda.
What does it mean to consecrate Russia?
Secret can be told later or can't
How to learn if it is a secret
How was portugal not affected by vatican 2?
"In Portugal, the dogmas of the faith will always be kept etcetra etcetra..."
The answer lies in that "etcetra etcetra" I reckon. the faith will be kept in the children? In a remnant? In a particular county? Who knows?
Of course it was, Portugal is no longer a catholic country and 99% of Portuguese are either atheist or non praticing chatolics, meaning they are not really catholics. However i live in Fatima and i see how people from all over the world flock over here, theres an FSSPX and a FSSP parish here, so its a religious center and alot can grow from here.
I recently watched the video that said Pope will release the full Third Secret of Fatima during WW3. I skeptic it 🤔🤨
The 3rd secret was about apostacy in the Vatican and the false mass.... The novus ordo.
who destroyed Toronto?
Are you a sedevacantist by any chance?
If not how do you believe that V2 lost the faith?
@@SolarSiege he isn't
There's no such thing as "our Lady of Mount Carmel", "our Lady of GuadaLupe", "our Lady of Good Success", "our Lady of LaSalette", "our Lady of "fátima"", et cetera.
EXAMPLE 1!
The apostate Peter the Hermit started the invention of the rosary. The apostate AntiSaint Domingo Félix de Guzmán invented the scapular. The apostate AntiSaint Simon Stock never even existed. The apostate Dominic of Prussia completed the invention of the rosary in a dream he allegedly had in the 14th century.
EXAMPLE 2!
The apostate Juan Diego never even existed. I don't know exactly who invented Juan Diego and the "our Lady of GuadaLupe" pseudoapparition. I, however, studied the "our Lady of GuadaLupe" pseudoapparition. I beseech you to closely examine the "our Lady of GuadaLupe" image. The background is lit with scarlet red which represents both the fires and blood of Hell. The woman rise from Mexico apparently in victory after converting the Mexicans not to Christianity but to "pornocratism" which is Latin uncatholicism. There's nothing Queenly or beautiful about the horns which signify AntiKingShip all around the AntiTheoTokos which resemble the horns of wild beasts which are actually attached to her feet as the infant AntiChrist or new AntiChristians lifts her up to signify that the AntiTheoTokos has the diabolical "power" to convert souls to her diabolical AntiQueenShip via diabolical "signs" and "wonders" and pseudomiracles.
EXAMPLE 3!
Mariana de Jesús Torres claimed TheoTokos Blessedly Saintly Virgin Mother Maria appeared in Quito and said "The Catholic spirit will rapidly decay." which TheoTokos Blessedly Saintly Virgin Mother Maria would've known is a lie because the Christian spirit started to decline when Pope Formosus was assassinated for political reasons in 896.
EXAMPLE 4!
Melanie Calvat and Maximin Giraud claimed TheoTokos Blessedly Saintly Virgin Mother Maria appeared in LaSalette and said Marseille would crumble into the ground and Paris would burn in 1865 and no such thing ever happened and Rome would lose the Faith and become the Seat of the AntiChrist when TheoTokos Blessedly Saintly Virgin Mother Maria would've known Rome lost the Faith and became the Seat of the AntiChrist when Pope Formosus was assassinated for political reasons in 896.
EXAMPLE 5!
Lúcia Santos and her cousins Jacinta and Francisco Marto claimed TheoTokos Blessedly Saintly Virgin Mother Maria appeared in "fátima" and claimed the Dogma of the Faith would always be PreServed in Portugal and world war 2 would start under the apostate AntiPope "Pius XI" and pointed the finger at only Russia as if Russia was the only biggest baddest guy and said nothing about post-schism apostate AntiPopes and conciliabulas and all their heresies and apostasies, nothing about apostate Western "europe" eversince 1014, nothing about simony eversince 1012, nothing about desecrations with jew-masonic-Satanic, Egyptian-Greco-Latin pagan, otherwise mythological, otherwise idolatrous, pornographic, otherwise immodest, secular, attempted "representations" of the Father [John 6:46], immodest attempted "representations" of the Son Who Is Risen not Dead [1 Corinthians 15:1-4] e.g. any false ""Christ" "Jesus"" e.g. Cesare Borgia half-naked on a Cross, inaccurate attempted "representations" of the TheoTokos, the Angels, and/or the Saints e.g. a false "Maria" e.g. Giovanna "Vannozza" (dei) Cattanei or white guys in robes passed off "as" the Fathers or artwork of AntiFathers or other AntiSaints, otherwise grotesque images, accurate representations made by unorthodox hands, and other unorthodox images against Churches and Romanesque and Gothic pagan meetinghouses alike eversince 1014, nothing about apostate Rome "corrupting" TheoLogy eversince 1075 and Canon Law eversince 1140, nothing about the jew-masonic-Satanic Divided States of ZombieLand and all her war crimes against humanity eversince 1776, nothing about the jews' inventions of both capitalism and communism, nothing about the United Nations and all her crimes against humanity eversince 1945, nothing about the jew-masonic-Satanic state of PseudoIsrael and all her crimes against humanity eversince 1948, when TheoTokos Blessedly Saintly Virgin Mother Maria would've known Portugal would apostatize even further at "VatiCan 2", the jews were behind all the revolutions, world war 2 would start; not under the apostate AntiPope "Pius XI" whom the AntiMary called a "Pope"; but under the apostate AntiPope "Pius XII", and postmodern Russia's 1 of the least of all the evils in the whole world, all of which TheoTokos Blessedly Saintly Virgin Mother Maria would've known and mentioned and pointed the finger at the jews instead of Russia which leads me to believe Russia will have a big positive thing to do with everything and TheoTokos Blessedly Saintly Virgin Mother Maria would've known the "our Lady of "fatima"" psyop's solar pseudomiracles were nothing more than what scientists call sundogs comparable to the "our Lady of BaySide" pseudoapparition's pseudo pseudomiracles. Show me where in Portugal the Dogma of the Faith Is AlWays Being PreServed. Tell me who. Gimme his name. Gimme his address. Show me what he believes in.
This' why Christians don't go outside (Traditional/)Biblical ParaMeters.
Dear one, this has nothing to do with Christianity. I know you won't agree, but you've been greatly deceived. Apparitions of Mary, are not of God.
You are the one who is deceived. Satan wants you isolated from God, His mother and His Saints. If you are alone then you believe yourself to be good enough to talk directly to God. By denying The Blessed Mother you deny Christ and have chosen Hell.
Apparitions of Mary ARE from God because Mary is the Mother of God, "But why am I so favored, that the mother of my Lord should come to me?" Luke 1:43
Mary appeared by way and allowance of Christ himself and His permission. If Christ did not want Mary to appear and give these messages then the Holy Mother would not have appeared. It was all because of Christ.
Those who deny and confuse the Mary events seem to be blinded even more so than what they claim us Catholics are.
@@BruceWayne-rb1mb "And I saw a Woman clothed with the sun and on her head a crown of twelve stars"
Christianity is about tithing 10% to your pastor, we know about that, yes.