Supreme Court to decide meaning of sex | Fiona McAnena on TalkTV

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 207

  • @benaberry578
    @benaberry578 2 місяці тому +81

    Awesome Scotland!!! Normal people fighting this ridiculousness

  • @jillraymond2394
    @jillraymond2394 2 місяці тому +99

    I am a woman and l have a certificate to prove it, it's called a birth certificate

    • @MAGNUM2F
      @MAGNUM2F 2 місяці тому +3

      That's not relevant at all.

    • @ronachadwick7908
      @ronachadwick7908 2 місяці тому +2

      Well said! X

    • @pinxtownington4645
      @pinxtownington4645 2 місяці тому

      Yes but dear now a days women gives birth to atleast twenty different gender I will have you known ( speaking from mentally ill Asylum)

    • @pollyparrot9447
      @pollyparrot9447 2 місяці тому +1

      Women don't need pieces of paper to prove we're women. Only men need pieces of paper to 'prove' they're women.

    • @sophiejameson428
      @sophiejameson428 2 місяці тому +4

      If a man gets a GRC (gender reassignment certificate) he can change the sex on his birth certificate.

  • @beatatz
    @beatatz 2 місяці тому +46

    Can't change sex, not even if you feel like it and not with a piece of paper. Insulting to both sexes.

  • @danielhaddon5499
    @danielhaddon5499 2 місяці тому +47

    Fiona you’re a force! Bravo!

  • @aitchemjay4520
    @aitchemjay4520 2 місяці тому +49

    Self ID was passed in Australia under stealth, no discussion, with the first State, Victoria having it passed during Covid. It’s now in every state. Australia has become the most captured country with no sex based rights.

    • @9395gb
      @9395gb 2 місяці тому

      Wow. The US finally got its sanity back and it was literally the number 1 issue that decided the election. Majority of america is against trans. It's nonsense.

    • @susandavorn3249
      @susandavorn3249 2 місяці тому +1

      I know 😢

  • @Wendyj55
    @Wendyj55 2 місяці тому +10

    Well done, For Women Scotland, for bringing this action in spite of all the barriers put in your way. We thank you for pushing on with this. We know you won't give up, and neither will the rest of us.

  • @hariseldon3786
    @hariseldon3786 2 місяці тому +22

    Conflating the word SEX with the concept of GENDER has been one of the Biggest CONS in recently legislative, legal and social history.

    • @roberta6220
      @roberta6220 2 місяці тому +2

      The funniest thing is that very recently the Scottish Govt put out 'guidance' to councils etc that they should keep data on 24 genders. And then on Tuesday their KC stated that sex and gender are the same, they're 'interchangeable' and that there are only TWO!!! And they talk about "becoming the sex of their gender" which is quite nonsensical!

  • @scotswumin5502
    @scotswumin5502 2 місяці тому +18

    Living 'as a woman' for 5 mins or 5 years does not make them a woman. Having a GRC Does not make them a woman and that law needs changing. Being selective about which men pass or have a fetish or a GRC confuses matters cos Sex Matters!

  • @chrisharwood5456
    @chrisharwood5456 2 місяці тому +46

    We need a petition to assert biological sex in our country 👍

    • @suzannelipscombe589
      @suzannelipscombe589 2 місяці тому +3

      Put it forward and I will sign

    • @chrisharwood5456
      @chrisharwood5456 2 місяці тому +1

      @ I think it needs someone who has loads of followers on FB or X to get it started (which I don’t)
      I have one currently running for electoral reform and it only has 35 signatures😞

    • @roberta6220
      @roberta6220 2 місяці тому

      What would the petition say? Change the law? That's what the Supreme Court case was all about! It's been and gone, we're just waiting for the verdict. If it doesn't go our way then lots of people will be up in arms and will sign a petition. But there's no point right now.

  • @stephenjarvis8420
    @stephenjarvis8420 2 місяці тому +24

    Thanks for keeping on keeping on Fiona.

  • @mars9953
    @mars9953 2 місяці тому +48

    I suggest the Trans movement is a misogynistic movement. Trans men are eroding women’s identity and safety, not to mention eroding the differences for impressionable children , who are being led to the trough of mental health confusion in later life. This upends our societal structure!

    • @ktwashere5637
      @ktwashere5637 2 місяці тому +1

      Trans ideology is open misogyny. Throughout history men have tried to claim women's bodies, this is just the current manifestation. Predatory men are pretending to be trans in order to attack women. If trans women really were women with the lived experience of being in a body that's female they would understand that and this would not be an issue.

    • @MetalGearsOfThought
      @MetalGearsOfThought 2 місяці тому

      If you don't even know that a male to female is a trans woman and a female to male is a trans man, then you literally have no idea what you're talking about. You don't know any trans people, you just watch sensationalist news shows designed to make you afraid. I swear to god, people who don't know Jack are making all the rules for everyone else in today's world, since there are so many uneducated people with big opinions spouting nonsense from rooftops. You need to get a sense of the real world outside your bubble. Trans people have always existed, will always exist, and you denying that is why so many trans kids take their lives, including female (sex) born trans men.

    • @mht5875
      @mht5875 2 місяці тому +1

      It really is destructive to the social fabric

    • @TheQuixoticRambler
      @TheQuixoticRambler 2 місяці тому +1

      I suggest we wouldn't even be having this conversation, were it not for contemporary Feminism.

    • @lornocford6482
      @lornocford6482 2 місяці тому

      ​@@MetalGearsOfThought why aren't 'trans'people campaigning for their own spaces? Why do those men want access to female spaces? I think that's very telling.

  • @TheSapphire51
    @TheSapphire51 2 місяці тому +57

    And to think that so many women have colluded with this nonsense. Biological sex we do not get to choose. Get over it.

  • @Leoviliti1
    @Leoviliti1 2 місяці тому +18

    It shouldnt have even needed a supreme court to tell us that!!!

  • @Wintersnowfall8
    @Wintersnowfall8 2 місяці тому +13

    Why is it that we are expected to respect their words to avoid upsetting them, while we accept the labels they assign to us to spare their feelings?

    • @susandavorn3249
      @susandavorn3249 2 місяці тому

      Because many or most of them are misogynists. The ones who are not are brainwashed, gullible, uneducated/ignorant, or just plain stupid. Or a combination of the aforementioned.

  • @shanksre6186
    @shanksre6186 2 місяці тому +23

    Thank you for all the hard work.

  • @jeantaylor9908
    @jeantaylor9908 2 місяці тому +8

    Finally!!!! Thank goodness, truth prevails!!

  • @lindsaywalton3254
    @lindsaywalton3254 2 місяці тому +24

    🙏🤞🏻🙏🙏🙏🙏🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻 the ruling reflects biological logic.

  • @Wintersnowfall8
    @Wintersnowfall8 2 місяці тому +12

    The women's movement was centered on ensuring that women would not have to sacrifice their needs, ambitions, or well-being to conform to patriarchal structures. Yet today, some argue that these hard-fought principles are being compromised when women are expected to step aside for men presenting as women.

  • @StephenODonnellx
    @StephenODonnellx 2 місяці тому +11

    Whose decision was it to allow birth certificates to be retrospectively changed? An official record which can be amended years later, is not an official record at all.

    • @roberta6220
      @roberta6220 2 місяці тому

      That was done by Tony Blair and David Lammy in 2004 in the Gender Recognition Act. And you're right, a birth certificate should only be changed if they got the sex wrong at birth, not for any 'identity' reasons. People have died because hospitals have treated people as the wrong sex, and the stupid patient hasn't put them right. Eg a patient with severe abdominal pain in ER was treated as an obese man and then suddenly had a baby, which didn't survive.

  • @nc5337
    @nc5337 2 місяці тому +17

    Needing a hashing out in court to be able to recognize and speak straight facts.

  • @Ratryggva1090
    @Ratryggva1090 2 місяці тому +7

    The fact that it had to get this far is a condemnation of the legal profession.

    • @roberta6220
      @roberta6220 2 місяці тому

      Blame it on Tony Blair and David Lammy, they pushed it through, mainly because Catholic TB didn't want same sex marriages. Questioned on the plight of wives whose husband might decide he's a woman DL just said they have a choice, no one is forcing them to transition and they will only do it after discussion with their wives. What an ignoramus!

  • @TracyPicabia
    @TracyPicabia 2 місяці тому +15

    @9:00 she's not only doing 'great things for women and girls' she and sex matters are doing great things for men and boys too.

  • @sn4rff
    @sn4rff 2 місяці тому +14

    thanks for this.

  • @moodyonroody5313
    @moodyonroody5313 2 місяці тому +23

    I'm still worried about the judgment.

    • @ktwashere5637
      @ktwashere5637 2 місяці тому +12

      me too, its terrifying to think about what might happen.

    • @suzannelipscombe589
      @suzannelipscombe589 2 місяці тому +7

      If the supreme Court doesn't get this right for all women and girls first(yes , first ) they will no longer be supreme in many peoples eyes and would massively loose respect from many...let's hope they think long and hard about this.

    • @roberta6220
      @roberta6220 2 місяці тому +1

      It was scary to hear some of the questions the judges were asking! One kept getting her sexes and genders muddled up, asking about natal women becoming women....

    • @roberta6220
      @roberta6220 2 місяці тому +1

      @@suzannelipscombe589 The problem is that the Supreme Court isn't ruling on what is sensible, or what the vast majority of people want. They're ruling on what various laws say and mean, and how they impact on other laws.

  • @Andrea19750
    @Andrea19750 2 місяці тому +5

    Well done Scotland 👏
    And spot on Alex

  • @pamelaroyce5285
    @pamelaroyce5285 2 місяці тому +5

    Birth certificates should not be changed. They are historical records. There should be a new form called a Birth Record Amendment that records *subsequent* data such as a name change or “gender” designation that is appended to that original, unchanged birth certificate.

  • @Zeebs1
    @Zeebs1 2 місяці тому +8

    🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿❤Alex

  • @hippophile
    @hippophile 2 місяці тому +21

    I am hereby coming out as a transvestite trans butch lesbian. This means I am a bloke who claims to be a woman but crossdresses as a man, prefers women, and carries on like a bloke. I am of course having NO operations, but I will be joining one or two local women's teams in sports which I really didn't get very far with as a, um, whatsit, er, cis man.

    • @Leoviliti1
      @Leoviliti1 2 місяці тому +2

      And your pronouns are ? 😂😅😂..
      No need..
      I'd be absolutely lost and sitting in the corner rocking to and fro repeating peanuts from my mouth
      Well done for implementing that list ..
      Not that I'd ever be able to make head nor tail from it . 😂 ❤

    • @hippophile
      @hippophile 2 місяці тому +2

      @@Leoviliti1 Oh, cripes! I'd forgotten about the pronoun thing! Oops!

    • @Leoviliti1
      @Leoviliti1 2 місяці тому

      @@hippophile 😂🤣😅😀👍🏻💐

  • @lornacarlos
    @lornacarlos 2 місяці тому +4

    Something is wrong in the world when what a woman is needs to be defined by the Supreme Court. A 5 year old child can tell one instantly.

  • @merridybenton7028
    @merridybenton7028 2 місяці тому +9

    A birth certificate is historical and should never be changed. Anyone who wants to be recognised as a different sex should have a new form to fill out just like a person who wants to change their name when they get married.

    • @ronachadwick7908
      @ronachadwick7908 2 місяці тому +1

      No certificates. No changes. Trans women are men. Get over it.

  • @TinnyDee
    @TinnyDee 2 місяці тому +10

    I am a woman. I have xx chromosomes. If you do not have xx chromosomes you are not a woman. Even if you hormonally or surgically transition. Your chromosomes do not change.

    • @sarahainscough6264
      @sarahainscough6264 2 місяці тому +3

      👍🎯 EXCACTLY! I don't get it 😢 makes no sense🤯

  • @kevinkheroux3438
    @kevinkheroux3438 2 місяці тому +5

    Alex: This ruling is great news.
    Fiona: There hasn't been a ruling yet.

  • @DavesFootballChannel
    @DavesFootballChannel 2 місяці тому +5

    people who define themselves by what THEY are and how people should treat THEM over and above how they treat others are narcissistic!

  • @andyforbes5553
    @andyforbes5553 2 місяці тому +7

    A lot in the gay community have been worried about the influence of Trans activists on their world.

  • @danielnigel6920
    @danielnigel6920 2 місяці тому +7

    And we need court to tell us? Modern society is lost

  • @Beautycomesoutofashes
    @Beautycomesoutofashes 2 місяці тому +3

    I’m Scottish and this is absolutely nonsensical! And why aren’t people bothered about what men are defined as 🤔

  • @herbiehopkins
    @herbiehopkins 2 місяці тому +4

    Finally some common sense 😊

  • @unitysprings3631
    @unitysprings3631 2 місяці тому +26

    I don't have gender dysphoria. Why am I compelled to acquiesce and deny biology?

    • @Sharetheroad3333
      @Sharetheroad3333 2 місяці тому

      @@unitysprings3631 what is your point

    • @Sharetheroad3333
      @Sharetheroad3333 2 місяці тому +1

      @@unitysprings3631 what is your point?

    • @unitysprings3631
      @unitysprings3631 2 місяці тому +1

      @@Sharetheroad3333 My point is, my reality is rooted in biology. I have no question or doubt about gender. Those who do, are pushing for us all to have gender dysphoria by denying biological reality and making gender a psychological condition.

    • @suzannelipscombe589
      @suzannelipscombe589 2 місяці тому +2

      Gaslighted rather than compelled I hope you mean

    • @unitysprings3631
      @unitysprings3631 2 місяці тому +2

      @suzannelipscombe589 That works too Suzanne. It's bonkers.

  • @cindyfaulkner5725
    @cindyfaulkner5725 2 місяці тому +9

    No one should be able to change anything on their birth certificate it is a document that states the facts of your birth, date you were born, your parents and what sex you were born, ie whether you were born with a vagina or penis, these facts can not be changed just because of your state of mind.
    You can call yourself whatever you want, wear what you like but you can not change your date of birth, parentage so why should you to change the sex you were born as on a legal document which states facts.
    Why can't they jusy change their ndme through deed pole to reflect who they think they are because no matter what you do you can not change your biological sex because you van not change the Chromosomes you were born with even if you can turn your penis inside out to make an assimilation of a vagina or have a cosmetic penis added to your body
    A woman is a woman and a man is a man and that can never be changed

    • @sarahainscough6264
      @sarahainscough6264 2 місяці тому

      I just don't understand😢🤯🤯🤯 how is it possible!??

  • @marieparker3822
    @marieparker3822 2 місяці тому +8

    The Gender Recognition Act (GRA), 2004, HAS TO BE REPEALED. Can this even be done without our escaping from the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR)?
    At the moment the Gender Recognition Act (GRA), and the Equality Act (2010) contradict each other.😖

    • @MAGNUM2F
      @MAGNUM2F 2 місяці тому +4

      Repeal, then change the laws.

  • @sarahainscough6264
    @sarahainscough6264 2 місяці тому +4

    🤯 there's only 2!! ♀️♂️ the world is mad!😩🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @louiseparker1915
    @louiseparker1915 2 місяці тому +6

    Aren’t fetishes recognised as being an exclusively male predilection?

    • @lornocford6482
      @lornocford6482 2 місяці тому

      I don't think they are. It's just more rare in females.

  • @pinxtownington4645
    @pinxtownington4645 2 місяці тому +3

    It must be the biggest debate since Adam and Eve

  • @russellkeates962
    @russellkeates962 2 місяці тому +2

    SPECIES MAN ... COMPRISES OF MAN AND WOMB MAN .... WHATS SO BLOODY DIFFICULT 😕

  • @valariesusan52
    @valariesusan52 2 місяці тому +8

    A woman has a womb. The name woman comes from womb man.A woman is life. What is a man??????

  • @BANKO007
    @BANKO007 2 місяці тому +2

    The supreme court can only confirm what we know from science, it cannot have freedom to decide this. If it could, it could rule that unicorns exist. I hope they recognise this in their ruling. The supreme court has no jurisdiction to pronounce against reality, it has an absolute duty to acknowledge reality.

    • @roberta6220
      @roberta6220 2 місяці тому +1

      The Supreme Court are ruling on what existing laws say and mean and how they interact. Unfortunately they're not going to be looking at what is sensible.

  • @Juniper-d5b
    @Juniper-d5b 2 місяці тому +1

    The Law of Nature is supreme

  • @Wintersnowfall8
    @Wintersnowfall8 2 місяці тому +6

    Women need to wake up and see how one-sided this is. It is all focused on men wanting into women spaces, changing terminology that women specific.

    • @lornocford6482
      @lornocford6482 2 місяці тому +2

      Do you think that there aren't men who need to wake up to what's going on?

    • @Wintersnowfall8
      @Wintersnowfall8 2 місяці тому

      @lornocford6482 I'm talking about women like AOC who are fighting to allow it to happen

    • @roberta6220
      @roberta6220 2 місяці тому

      But why DO so many women go along with it? I can't fathom it. Do they think that we're just making up the loss of rights? Or that 'being kind' to fetishy men is the right thing to do? Why do women's organisations, that exist to educate and empower women and girls include men in the category of women? UNWomen I'm thinking of you and your talk of 'all women', diversity and 'being inclusive'. Why would you?? One of the answers is that Biden is a big funder of the UN and they have imposed their ideals on them in exchange for money. So everyone has to go along with it. In Scotland only refuges that admit men get govt funding so most go along with it for the money and jobs.

    • @CrystalShadow
      @CrystalShadow Місяць тому

      Yes but some only wake up when they are directly affected 😢

  • @PeterHolman-xt4fb
    @PeterHolman-xt4fb 2 місяці тому +3

    This is common sense over absurd ideology.
    The fact that some authorities need s court judgement to ratify this reality defies belief but, these are the days we are living through under activist led socialism.

  • @darksoul479
    @darksoul479 12 днів тому

    Bravo!❤

  • @suzannelipscombe589
    @suzannelipscombe589 2 місяці тому +5

    I would call it political incorrectness.....

  • @ObiePaddles
    @ObiePaddles 2 місяці тому +6

    What about giggle vs tickle?

    • @gryphc3860
      @gryphc3860 2 місяці тому +9

      Sal is taking the case to the next level and rightly so.

    • @suzannelipscombe589
      @suzannelipscombe589 2 місяці тому +5

      I might have the mind police after me with that one!!

    • @lornocford6482
      @lornocford6482 2 місяці тому

      That's in Australia. They're talking about UK law.

  • @jlm3124
    @jlm3124 2 місяці тому +2

    It is femphobic to say it isn't biological.

  • @lanarkcd
    @lanarkcd 2 місяці тому +3

    I thought the case was utterly ridiculous. However, considering the nonsense Starmer and his clown show are likely to bring in at some point, the Scottish government-through their sheer stupidity in pursuing such cases and getting humiliated all the way to the Supreme Court-has exposed itself as utterly incompetent. Ironically, they’ve inadvertently created a judgment that will serve as a benchmark, making it far harder for future idiocy from Starmer to be imposed.

  • @sunyata4974
    @sunyata4974 2 місяці тому +3

    Court to decide? I thought it was a biologist's job.

  • @mak7587
    @mak7587 2 місяці тому

    Go Scottie’s 👏👍😄

  • @johnpatmos1722
    @johnpatmos1722 2 місяці тому +2

    I'm surprised. Nevetheless, it doesn't sound like it goes far enough.

  • @normsky5504
    @normsky5504 2 місяці тому

    A judge is no more a biologist, than an ex-lawyer is a prime minister.

  • @peteypops
    @peteypops 2 місяці тому +1

    Why should someone wearing a false wig be qualified to decide which biological facts are truly facts

  • @jonathanmcstay
    @jonathanmcstay 2 місяці тому

    🎉

  • @i_kissed_a_pixie1537
    @i_kissed_a_pixie1537 2 місяці тому +1

    I am pleased with the Courts decision. I still care how people are treated despite their self identification, but it is fair to have single sex spaces.

    • @roberta6220
      @roberta6220 2 місяці тому

      There is NO court decision and there won't be until the spring.

  • @JohnCatto
    @JohnCatto Місяць тому

    Please God let the court decide on reality and then perhaps this nonsense can be brought under control.

  • @roblewisjr2
    @roblewisjr2 Місяць тому

    So courts decide if science is science? Not…. science?

  • @Scoops-q4c
    @Scoops-q4c 2 місяці тому +3

    THEY ARE NOT WOMEN it’s simple im sorry but thats biology.

  • @MarinaE-mo2wy
    @MarinaE-mo2wy 2 місяці тому +1

    I have no idea why Fioana is yelling that there is some kind of win.
    Its NOT decided yet. She strikes me as not very bright and why doesnt she look her guest in the eye and engage with her? its so rude.

  • @hospitalsgivingpatientsdan8894
    @hospitalsgivingpatientsdan8894 29 днів тому

    Femininity in biological males and masculinity in biological females Transsexuality genuine cases extremely rare

  • @janebennetto5655
    @janebennetto5655 2 місяці тому +1

    ❤️🇬🇧❌❌

  • @janwhite6038
    @janwhite6038 2 місяці тому

    Why waste Court time on this issues? Midwives used to decide this at birth, alledgly.

    • @roberta6220
      @roberta6220 2 місяці тому

      Yes but now some people want to change it for various reasons so someone has to sort it out.

  • @russellkeates962
    @russellkeates962 2 місяці тому

    BUY YOURSELF AN 18TH CENTURY DICTIONARY AND THEN YOU MIGHT UNDERSTAND LANGUAGE AND THE USE OF , INSTEAD OF ARGUING ABOUT MEANING AND INTERPRETATION.... SIMPLE

  • @Anna-fw7lm
    @Anna-fw7lm 2 місяці тому +11

    So if I have a tiger and on the documents it's stated that's a dog... can I walk around the city with the -tiger- dog on a leash?

  • @berniefynn6623
    @berniefynn6623 2 місяці тому +4

    Court has juristiction,this is biology,we just need to make officials observe basic biology

  • @davidedgar7338
    @davidedgar7338 2 місяці тому +15

    mutated man ≠ woman

  •  2 місяці тому +1

    REMOVE MEN FROM LAWMAK8NG WHO FORCE THIS ABUSE N RAPECULTURE ON WOMEN!

  • @asabache2k
    @asabache2k 2 місяці тому +2

    👗👗 Does anyone know if this organization (LG:::) has ever held a private party for children to attend?

  • @JC-ut4oi
    @JC-ut4oi 2 місяці тому +1

    What a waste of money. That is general knowledge ffs