Limit of a rational exponential function

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 44

  • @CroneoRegion
    @CroneoRegion 7 місяців тому +18

    when you got 6+6t, shouldn't it be 6+9t? the answer would still be the same, but I thought that would be the right step

    • @ounaogot
      @ounaogot 7 місяців тому

      Why 9t? Understood why it was 6t

    • @dutchie265
      @dutchie265 7 місяців тому

      Doubling 3 will give 6, so why would it be 9?

    • @TheLukeLsd
      @TheLukeLsd 7 місяців тому

      Isso mesmo. Eu estava indo comentar sobre essa parte.

    • @TheLukeLsd
      @TheLukeLsd 7 місяців тому +2

      @@dutchie265 não é o dobro. quando se iguala as bases fica 3(1+3t)+3= 3+9t+3=6+9t. ele se confundiu porque por coincidência 2*2= 2². mas a generalização de d/dt [ ln(1+at) + at/(1+at)] = (2a+a²t)/(1+at)². ele pensou em (2a+2at)/(1+at)² erroneamente.

    • @muhammadridholatif8817
      @muhammadridholatif8817 7 місяців тому +5

      Yes its 6+9t i notice abkut it also from (3(1+3t)+3)/(1+3t)²

  • @JourneyThroughMath
    @JourneyThroughMath 7 місяців тому +11

    This is one of those "oh yeah!" Problems. I was never assigned anything like this in my calculus days. Nor have I assigned anything like this. So I looked at this problem and didnt even know where to start. But every step of the way, my response was "oh yeah"..."oh yeah"...and so on.

  • @BetaLoversYT
    @BetaLoversYT 7 місяців тому +5

    I have to do multiple variable analysis in university, but this videos really help in dealing with hard problems, thanks for the video!

  • @nothingbutmathproofs7150
    @nothingbutmathproofs7150 7 місяців тому +1

    That problem was completely crazy. It seemed to be a battle between you and the limit the whole time. As always, in the end, you won!

  • @juv7026
    @juv7026 7 місяців тому +3

    (1+ax)^x-1=(x/1!)*(ax)^1+((x)(x-1)/2!)*(ax)^2+…
    Lowest exponent possible x^2 is only given by first term, so neglect other powers (a=2,3)
    So given limit is a1/a2=2/3
    Took 10 seconds

  • @cameronspalding9792
    @cameronspalding9792 7 місяців тому +2

    The way I would approach it is to work out (1+2t)^t = exp(ln(1+2t)*t). For small values of t:
    ln(1+2t)*t = t*(2t + O(t^2))
    = 2*t^2 + O(t^3). This implies
    (1+2t)^t = 1 + 2 t^2 + O(t^3). Using a similar argument: we have that
    (1+3t)^t = 1 + 3 t^2 + O(t^3) for small values of t.
    Using the above approximations: we see that the expression we want to take limits for can be written as
    ((1+2t)^t-1)/((1+3t)^t-1)
    = (2 t^2 + O(t^3))/(3 t^2 + O(t^3))
    = (2 + O(t))/(3 + O(t)) for small values of t. This expression tends to 2/3 as t tends to 0.

  • @saarike
    @saarike 5 місяців тому

    This is like magic!!! Thank you.

  • @muhammadridholatif8817
    @muhammadridholatif8817 7 місяців тому +9

    For the last bottom it should be 6+9t from (3(1+3t)+3)/(1+3t)²
    The answer is just the same tho cus it will just 0 at the end 😂😂

  • @Viesto1980
    @Viesto1980 7 місяців тому +1

    You are great! Regards from Poland!

  • @lukaskamin755
    @lukaskamin755 7 місяців тому +3

    Wow that's kinda a tricky one, it looks terrifying and it appeared to be quite tough at the end🎉. But interesting.
    I just would recommend to everyone for future , if you see the alike expressions and you have to do some complex stuff with them, like differentiation, simply substitute that number which is different with some letter constant, say a, and at the end you can calculate what it would be if a=2 and a=3, just to be on the safe side. I'm also lazy, but if it comes to passing some exam , that error could cost too much, so I would definitely do that. Luckily that didn't effected the result😊

  • @michaelbaum6796
    @michaelbaum6796 7 місяців тому +2

    Very nice limit👍

  • @LORDLDUQ
    @LORDLDUQ 7 місяців тому

    The best math channel 👍

  • @surendrakverma555
    @surendrakverma555 6 місяців тому

    Very good lecture Sir. Thanks 👍

  • @AshokKumar-ul6dg
    @AshokKumar-ul6dg 6 місяців тому

    For applying L'Hospital:a rule, why use substitution?
    By directly differentiating, and substitution, (nr. Treated as u^t-1, we get 2/3.

  • @davidcroft95
    @davidcroft95 7 місяців тому +3

    At 6:16 could we use binomial expansion? Since t goes to zero you can neglect "high" power of t (like t cubed) and, more importantly, the undetermined form vanish

    • @abhishankpaul
      @abhishankpaul 7 місяців тому +1

      We can do it. But binomial would be unnecessary here

    • @davidcroft95
      @davidcroft95 7 місяців тому

      @@abhishankpaul of course you don't need the whole expansion, you just need the first term (like when you use the Taylor series' trick)

    • @abhishankpaul
      @abhishankpaul 7 місяців тому

      @@davidcroft95 I got you, but what I meant to say is that binomial expansion will work, but that would be an overkill in this question

  • @mirzatayerejepbayev8367
    @mirzatayerejepbayev8367 7 місяців тому

    Thank you. It is very well done

  • @dan-florinchereches4892
    @dan-florinchereches4892 8 днів тому

    Can't we use the following definition if exponential:
    Lim(n->inf)= (1+1/n)^(n)=e then if we have the limit (1+a/n)^n=(1+1/(n/a))^(n/a×a)=((1+1/(n/a))^(n/a))^a=e^a in the limit
    Then by forcing out X as common factor from the parenthesis we get ( e^2-1)/(e^3-1)

  • @highestintheroom-mn7lt
    @highestintheroom-mn7lt 7 місяців тому

    This one was a banger 🔥

  • @Edsonrsmtm
    @Edsonrsmtm 7 місяців тому

    Beatifull lim!!!

  • @Subham-Kun
    @Subham-Kun 6 місяців тому

    Girls : Taylor Swift & Billie Eillish are the best
    Boys : Lil Nas X & Jason Derulo are the best
    Mathematicians : PRIME NEWTONS' INTRO IS THE BEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @artdeheer6115
    @artdeheer6115 7 місяців тому

    2t(1+2t)^(t-1)

  • @lukaskamin755
    @lukaskamin755 7 місяців тому

    I didn't got the idea about infinite root of infinity, from where can one derive it to be zero?

    • @PrimeNewtons
      @PrimeNewtons  7 місяців тому +1

      It's 1 not zero

    • @lukaskamin755
      @lukaskamin755 7 місяців тому

      @@PrimeNewtons oops, a typo, you know, thinking about one thing and typing something different Lol. Anyways I don't know that limit, why it's 1? Is it some known limit? Give me a hint, thanks

  • @Moj94
    @Moj94 7 місяців тому

    nice

  • @mustaphaballaji4628
    @mustaphaballaji4628 7 місяців тому

    You are gorgeous.

  • @downrightcyw
    @downrightcyw 3 місяці тому

    Giant 1

  • @vitalytolochanov4475
    @vitalytolochanov4475 7 місяців тому

    we found t, not x

  • @comdo777
    @comdo777 7 місяців тому +1

    asnwer=1+2/5 isit

    • @comdo777
      @comdo777 7 місяців тому

      ah ah asnwer=2/3 isit

    • @lukaskamin755
      @lukaskamin755 7 місяців тому

      aNSwer , anyways wrong 😅