Off-Road Truck Shootout! 2024 Chevy Colorado ZR2 Bison vs Ford Ranger Raptor
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 вер 2024
- Which is the better choice for your driveway? We compare features and functions of the two hottest mid-sized trucks you can buy today: the 2024 Chevrolet Colorado ZR2 Bison edition and the all-new Ford Ranger Raptor!
#offroad #ford #chevrolet
Get a VIP Pass for Driving Sports TV on UA-cam:
/ @drivingsports
Driving Sports produces exclusive automotive reviews, news and motor sports for broadcast, web, mobile and set-top boxes. Do not use our video content without permission. All rights are reserved.
Equipment used to make this video:
Canon R5: amzn.to/2KcwacW
Canon R6: amzn.to/33xLpUa
Canon 24-105mm f/4: amzn.to/2Jx0I8e
BlackMagic Ursa 4.6k G2: amzn.to/37poIm6
Sony RX0II (in-car camera) amzn.to/2NCfWbp
Rode Go Wireless mic amzn.to/364zLP5
GoPro amzn.to/2RrdNjT
Aputure Amaran AL-MW LED amzn.to/3lZHbfP
Follow us:
Facebook: / drivingsports
Twitter: / drivingsports
Official Site: www.drivingspor...
That lift and 35s just make such a big difference.
but for 10+g's extra, you take 5-6 and put it on the raptor and it's for sure equal if not better, except for the under carriage cameras
Unless someone is doing heavy rock crawling or heavy swamp overlanding, I think the Ranger is better in basically every other situation (including on road to drive to your destinations or as a daily, which can’t be overlooked). Think the Bison is amazing absolutely perfect for a select niche crew, those looking for a great super mid size truck though the Raptor is the one.
Great review!
I don't know, those multimatic shocks are unbelievable on-road from what I have read.
@@paulelledge8977 - we love the multimatics on our ZR2. But the Ranger is excellent from what I have heard.
I’ll take the 3.0 v6 vs the 2.7 v4
What I will say is that a better comparison between the two in regards to equipment is the regular ZR two because the payload is at between 14 and 1500 pounds towing capacity is 6500 pounds you get less skid plates and you don't get the 35s but It's a better comparison although the ZR2 regularly is around 46,000 start out
@@AnonDogeInline 4 not V4
Going by looks alone the Bison beats every manufacturer mid size
💯 And it's not close.
0- 60? 60- 80? Fuel efficiency? Turning circle? 60- 0 braking? Brake feel? Transmissions? Transfer cases? Switchable ABS? Different levels of traction control? Towing capacity? How are they in emergency maneuvers? (left right transitions, etc)
Is the $10k delta significant when you consider the AEV upgrades, superior DSSV shocks, 35 inch tires, superior camera system, physical buttons, increased suspension flex, rear vents, etc etc etc.
Does either have a heads up display? Does the sun reflect off the dash and cause glare for the driver?
So many unanswered questions. So much unsaid. So little actually said. You reviewed these like you had 10 minutes with both of them
Most people only care about Rock crawling.
Enough said to pick the winner that was locked in when this comparison was first announced.
Yikes, really not showing the bias with this one ay Bowties ?
@@ryanb8736 Actually, I think most people only care about Mall Crawling...and driving over those scary-high curbs/parking-lot divides (let's admit they ARE pretty challenging!) to be found there as well.
In that case, either of these tucks will do.
As for me, I was also looking for a mid-size "Top Dog/off-road-focused/serious 4x4" truck (back in 2021)...got a Jeep Gladiator Rubicon. Only the ZR2 was out then -- "technically" available but in reality NOT available due to the chip-shortage) -- there were no Broncos of any kind (just Ford advertising hype/vaporware for almost 2 years) or Ranger Raptor.
Looking at these two trucks, were I buying today I'd still go with a Jeep Gladiator. So far, it's been fine -- no regrets, disappointments or buyer's remorse -- and WAY cheaper in early 2021 than they are now. I'll be keeping it for quite some time...
-- BR
@@leofhr2966 The tester owns a Ranger Raptor, no bias there.
Raptor for me, a nice balance of everything & 65k for the chev 😳
Ive found the bison for well under that for 55k
@@LibertyorDeath1787 Sorry but that's not common, 9/10 times you won't find that kind of pricing.
A nice balance of everything? Have you seen it? The Ford doesn’t compare to the Colorado’s design. Lol. I’ll take the noticeably more capable truck at this end of the spectrum. The “Raptor” treatment seems like it was phoned in.
You can get a regular zr2 for 48k and still very capable with front/rear lockers
How do you not point out the lack of a rear a.c vent or heated/cooled seats on the Ranger? It just seems weird to knock the Chevy for a lack of powered seats but the Ranger gets a pass.
8:12
I didn’t know the Colorado has rear air vents. That is a big plus because most mid sized trucks have nada for the rear passengers. That a huge deal to me!
this guy is partial to the Ranger because that’s his…..
The ranger has a vent under the driver and passenger seats for the rear and heated seats. I wish it had cooled seats but for everything else it gives and the price difference, I'd pick the Ford over the Chevy any day.
@@supralyfe1206 I had to get a couple big packages to get the few things I wanted (heated steering wheel, cameras, etc.), and thought the cooled/heated seats were a gimmick (I live where we have winter, and go over a 9,300ft pass to work) because my hands get cold on the wheel in winter but my ass really doesn't, but man, after doing a recent trip to Moab last month for 3 days wheeling, and up to CO for 1 day, on long trips, those cooled seats REALLY make a difference in keeping you from getting swampsack and swampcrack! In fact, most of the things I thought were gimmicks, I really like, so, I'm glad I bought them. I think the only real option I don't have is the Bose audio. Not a real fan of Bose, and the base system sounds pretty decent, but I would have paid the extra $500. I would have PREFERRED to have a factory upgrade to B&O (like I think the Raptor has - I have an '80's Beogram 5500 turntable I love), or maybe Focal speakers (like in my home theater), but it's ok. I'll probably keep the stock head unit and upgrade to Focals if possible. If price is an issue, get a regular ZR2. With the exception of the extra 95hp, it's the Raptor's equal, for $6k (similarly equipped)-$16k (w/dealer markup) less.
Now we need another similar comparison by someone who owns Bison for a change :-)
Always been a Ford fan but the Bison is beautiful
Next up Ranger Raptor VS Taco TRD PRO VS ZR2 Bison 🔥🔥🔥🔥
Spoiler, taco loses
If you’ve already bought a Ford the test is tainted
I chose the Ranger Raptor and actually ordered one
Big factor for me was the physical headlight switch, something I need where I work. The other big factor was payload capacity. I also really like the comfort of the Raptor... smoothest driving truck I've been in. Can't wait to take delivery
Hopefully you don't need the locking differentials that often.
Locker switches on the touch screen are not an issue for me but thanks for your concern
they charge you a market adjustment?
@@davidd8892 no
I like the comparison, though I think the regular ZR2 is more compareable because moving up to the Bison comes with some compromise and is a VERY expensive package
Yep exactly 💯.
#whyIgota"regular"2024ZR2
Agreed...and when you compare the two trucks then, no contest. At 51K, the ZR2 is a no brainer compared to a 65K plus dealer markup Ranger.
This is a bad comparison when it comes to price. I just got my 2024 ZR2 ($54K) ALL the bells and whistles. You get a little bit more armure and bigger tires at a very high price with the Bison. Sure the Raptor has more HP... Fine, IMO... I want the off-road capability and I think that is were the ZR2 shines above the Raptor. And it looks WAY more beautiful. Raptor has NO personality in looks. Just opinion, both bad A!@ trucks. Turds just got a slap in the arse. :)
Although I do like the 35s on the Chevy, and the look of the exterior, I like everything else about the Ford. I’m not a Ford guy or a Chevy guy, as I have a Toyota 4Runner and Lexus IS, but I think compared to the upcoming Tacoma trail hunter, I’d go for the Ford
Same here, When Elon Musk said Ford was ahead of everyone..... Say Less Elon, I'm going with Elon word, so Ford it is
This review was clearly biased towards the Ford. That interior is nowhere near as nice as the ZR2 Bison nor is Ford’s technology anywhere near what *gm* has been offering. Where are the quality materials in the Ford? It’s literally the same plastics, the plastics do look cheaper in the Ford though.
@@G-Rated well tell that to Elon Musk, because he would tell you , you don't know the hell you're talking about
@@BruceDragon-sf1tr And I’m telling you he doesn’t know what the hell he’s talking about. Elon being a shill for Ford doesn’t change physics nor sales figures. Nobody sells more premium trucks than *gm* and that’s for a reason. Similar to how Elon wants respect for Model Y being a best seller. Lol 🤡
4-cylinder on a performance truck is not acceptable. It might be ok for regular daily driving but to consider it performance at that price of $65K? Again, not acceptable.
I got a Colorado ZR2 because in Canada we get screwed on the ranger Raptor that cost 90k I paid 60k for my Zr2 I find it funny that you also complain about the lights being on the screen something that you will barely touch just leave it in auto but you don't talk about the lockers being stuck behind two screens on the ranger Raptor
A lot of moron freaking out about the headlight switch. I never even touched mine in my truck for the 4 years I owned it
Ford fanboi disguised as balanced & fair.
These trucks make the new TRD Pro look like a thing of the past ! 💀
For the same price and similar engines, Id choose the ZR2 !
(I own a 3rd gen TRD Pro btw)
Especially when reliability isn't a factor anymore with Toyotas. Any of these new trucks will eventually break, so why not just get the truck that gets you the most for your money. Definitely not the new Tacoma's
@@code_xj lol if all of them are shite I'll pick Tacoma
Even though the Ranger, beats it almost every category?
@@ha-kh7ef have fun overpaying for a midsize truck. Hope you don't grenade ur front diff like TFL did ☠️
@@code_xj Everything seems overpriced these days...
They are not mud terrains. They are maximum traction.
Yup, misbranding.
I like the Raptor butTONS of great stuff on the Bison too.
The roots of these trucks are the powertrain and suspension. And after driving both, the raptor won handedly.
Yeah, this was a very Ford biased review. He really lost me when he said Ford does software and digital instrument clusters more reconfigurable and better to use. What a joke.
More like a very obvious choice considering the powertrain and price; the only negative on the R. Raptor are the tires; but that can easily upgraded to a 35" considering it's about 8-10K less than Bison. Exterior aesthetic, the Bison wins for me; however it's negated by it's 4 cylinder powertrain and at this point for a truck, I can't compromise. So, is it really biased or just common sense.... well maybe I'm a bit biased since I daily drive the full-size Raptor.
@@alexmar1382 Yea it’s bias. Ford evidently didn’t go the same lengths as GMC to make it a true all-terrain truck. The Ford is quicker but it can’t go places the GMC or Bison can from the factory. It doesn’t have the same rock crawling capabilities nor luxury, or tech (AT4x).
Ford Raptor’s negatives also include a weak & dated exterior, underwhelming and cheap interior aesthetic, and the tech also does not compete with GMC. Nobody in the real world is spending $60k on a Ranger and then happily paying another $10,000 to make it as capable from the factory as the Canyon AT4x it competes with. You’re drunk off the Ford cool-aid. The 4-cylinder is a positive for Canyon buyers who wanted a weaker V6.
@@G-Rated obviously a biased opinion; not facts.
@@alexmar1382 you’re obviously biased as you’ve admitted, but we both know there were people who felt a 6-cylinder wasn’t enough for a high performance full-size F-150 either yet you bought one and allegedly love it. No different from the guy with the better designed AT4x and a powerful 4-banger. Truth hurts. 🤷🏽♂️
@@G-Rated I was honest; you were of it... shit that is.
I chose a 2024 "regular", fully-loaded w/moonroof, paint protection, window tint, wheel locks blue ZR2, for the $53k MSRP I paid. The moonroof was over $1k and the Raptor doesn't offer one. Not a deal-breaker for me, but I love them. The $6k difference equally equipped plus the inevitable absurd markup ($10k or so) for us that are NOT UA-cam famous, made that my choice. Yes, the Ranger Raptor is badass, and I considered one....until I got wind of the markups. Hard nope. For the money I saved, I'll put 285/75/17's (34's) on it because that oem width on the OEM rims should fit in the OEM spare location, and maybe I'll get a mild 1-2" lift, a gas tank and an aluminum rear diff skidplate and maybe a mild engine tune, and I'll have 99% of the Bison at a fraction of the cost. I find the power very adequate, especially at elevation, but I figure a mild tune (performance airbox/filter and cat-back exhaust, maybe a slight ECU re-map) will get me closer to the Raptor (which REQUIRES premium if I remember) and I consider the suspension equal. I'm very much a noob wheeler, and after 3 days in Moab and another in Colorado, it handled everything I threw at it (couple steep bumpy climbs) like it was nothing. WAY more capable than I am, and I plan to get better and grow into it. Nice vid as always, keep 'em coming!
I didn't realize the raptor does not offer a moonroof. I used to not care for them but have had several and also like them
@@planoman0935 Once you have one, it's tough to go back without one.
@@kx8960 I don’t even use mine all that much but when I want to use it, it is there!
@@planoman0935 Yup! And even when I don't open it, it's nice to just let the light in, or shut the shade if the sun is beating on your head.
Paid msrp for my Raptor. Most dealerships were wanting $5k over tho. Drove 2.5 hours to get it. Also, can’t stand moon roofs. Too hot here and extra weight not needed.
Chevy looks awesome...too bad they're garbage. I'd pick the Ranger any day. Hell...I'd pick a Frontier Pro4X over a Chevy.
What Chevy have you owned?
Drop the Bison package. Put the 12K in your pocket. Game over. ZR2 all day, every day.
Yup, and I did, loaded '24
I can't get over the wheel in the bed.
@bananarobotoverlord Another reason why the base ZR2 is a better option IMO.
@@bananarobotoverlord Climb in the bed on the passenger side or from the tailgate then...🤣
I4....NO Thanks !!
The points the Chevy won - rock rails and 35s are an easy addition. But you are not going to change the better powertrain and interior. The Ford blows the Chevy out of the water.
Ranger has a better interior?? The Chevy’s is miles nicer. Ford still hasn’t even fixed the uneven panels throughout the interior
@@BIGGIEBAG-XL there is no fixing the cramped rear seat in the Chevy. The Ford is superior
And the extra $8k difference would easily cover the cost of rock rails and 35's.
I felt that these two trucks have different missions. The ZR2 is trying to be an all around great off road truck. While the raptor isn’t going to be crawling over rocks, but sure will shine in any baja terrain.
The Bison or ZR2 works great, just as well in the desert, that's what the DSSV's are made for. I bought a '24 "regular" ZR2.
The ZR2 is better off road than the Raptor.
@@bostonaviation2010 I'd say equal (regular ZR2), better in some areas, not as good in others. The Raptor has a lower crawl ratio, but the ZR2 has a significantly better approach angle with essentially equal breakover and departure angles and better armor and cameras. The regular ZR2 has better payload and towing than the Bison too, probably equal to the Ranger.
Zr2 is slow. How many people take these off road ? 1-2 out of 10 ? 4 banger won’t even beat a civic off a red light in the city. Embarrassing
@@gunsmokezz LOL You're the byproduct of the union of brother and sister, aren't you? I have one, and it's plenty quick enough, 0-60 in 6.8. Too high for you to count to since that would mean using the fingers on BOTH hands....🤣 Oh, and I got it muddy and snowy with less than 200mi on the odo, and took it to Moab for 3 full days of offroading with 700mi on the odo. So, while YOU may be a mall crawler, I'm not, and there are plenty of others like me that have them. Enjoy your little Hyundai Santa Cruz there Cleetus...
The reason the Ford has such better payload than the Chevy is due to all of the off-road specific AEV items on the Bison. Add 35s, heavy duty bumpers, rock rails, underbody armor, etc, to the Ford and the weight will go up quickly, eating into its payload numbers. I realize this is a comparison of off the showroom vehicles, & it’s fair, but if anyone’s planning on adding that stuff to the ford (I know I’d at least want to replace its plastic “skidplates” with metal), it’s worth noting that the payload number can tumble quickly. Good overall comparison though, as usual man.
agreed. that weight took away the payload
Well, yeah..that’s why Ford won on payload and Chevy won on the off road tech or whatever he called that category.
Correct
Already has all of that stuff except the 35s. Still weighs less, won’t snap in half on a desert run, and is better to drive. Plus it has better everything else with the exception of rear seat vents.
@@The-fs5wn as long as you don't have to replace the engine.
Ranger raptor starts at 80k in Canada. I think the raptor is only cheaper than the bison, in USA.
It's not unless you're a UA-camr. I tried to buy one and with dealer markups in Denver the best price I was offered was $70,000 U.S.
Bought a raptor. So im bias. But there is a reason I bought it. Its cheaper, and better than the zr2 bison.
Subjective pal, the raptor is not equipped to rock crawl, the Colorado is. The raptor is better at high speed desert driving, the Colorado isn’t. But let’s be honest, neither of you buyers are gonna use it for its intended purpose.
@@braddenr.4778 The ZR2 I think does just as well in the high speed stuff, my "regular" '24 ZR2 ripped over the roads I took it on. Not AS good as a Bison with the extra tire and jounce dampers, but more than good for my purposes AND a LOT cheaper than either. I literally have desert a block from my house, any number of different rutted roads.
@@kx8960 Oh absolutely I’m not knocking the dssv dampers, they’re fantastic. I just mean 1v1, the raptor is definitely designed to take on Baja running a little better. That being said I strongly believe that the Zr2 is much more likely to wheel with my wranglers. Which I value 110% more, I’d have about 1300 miles of driving to touch any sand dunes lol.
@@braddenr.4778 Admittedly I'm a total noob to serious offroading (I "softwheeled my 2010 V6 AWD RAV4 for years, going places I probably shouldn't...), but it handled 3 days offroad in Moab about a month ago and 1 day this last weekend in CO like everything I threw at it was nothing, steep semi-loose and rutted/ledged hills. LOVED bombing at arounf 55mph on the dirt roads in the Valley of The Gods. I'm not good enough to try REALLY challenging stuff, but man, it was WAY better at everything I did than my buddy's 'Taco TRD Offroad on the similar stuff we did.
I bought the Raptor and I will say this, it is by far the best overall truck I've ever owned period
Nothing comes close
Did you pay markup?
Don't say that; Xrated... I mean G-rated will get triggered.
If you would have purchased the ZR2 it would be best overall truck . It's called bias . I just drove both the Raptor/Bison . Raptor feels like a sport truck and Bison feels like a real man's truck . OTD both $62k . Raptors are all marked up . If your a serious off roader the Bison is hard to beat .
@@waynejewell-sw8qg yal are both bias. It's ok to have different opinions because yal can both buy different trucks and be happy.
I don’t have a dog in this fight nor do I favor one company over the other. However, the choice is pretty clear. For the difference in price, add the 35 inch tires to the Raptor and you will have an all around better vehicle than the Bison. There is simply no comparison between the Raptor’s power plant and the Bison’s.
I’ll take the Chevy
Exterior looks are much better on the Chevy. This should have been included. With that said the Ranger is the clear winner.
When it comes to looks, I think the FORD is understated or "SAFE"!, but the Chevy I think is too flashy to the level of may be "obnoxious". Its 35 inch wheels/tires look too oversized and disproportionate to the truck. Its loverall looks can steer away many "main stream" drivers.
Looks are subjective
Absolutely subjective. I think the ford looks better but not by much.
@@ebnhahn1993safe looking? That’s a weird statement. Not sure why some are afraid of a great looking vehicle.
GM looks way better. Looks meaner and wider.
So many have already said it, but the ZR2 is literally a straight up competitor. Not sure why the Bison was used. Throw the TRD Pro in the mix as well.
I'd take the Bison. Looks better and more capable off-road. I like the interior of the Ford better, but everything else I prefer on the Chevy. Although the price is INSANE. Also, it wouldn't take much effort to simply remove the spare from the bed to gain full access.
The base ZR2 is just an unbeatable price. The Ranger Raptor is just a LOT of money in comparison. The payload and bed would be more comparable as well as the Bison has that big tire in there. That said -- ultimately these are two of the best pickup trucks ever made in this segment of offroad mid-size pickup trucks and blow Toyota's offerings away (at least on paper) for the price. Too bad EVERYTHING is very expensive now. I chose the ZR2 (non-Bison) just due to the price point and its great looks. Loving it so far. The Ranger Raptor's powerplant (and paddle shifters) are what I would love to have. But I'm happy with saving over $12k!
Yup, I just got a loaded w/moonroof, blue, '24 ZR2 as well, and with 34's (still fits under the bed) and maybe a 2" lift, it's 99% of the Bison for thousands cheaper than either.
I picked the "regular" ZR2. There's no Ford dealership around here selling Ranger Raptors at MSRP... so the price comparison in the video is academic, at best. I don't dislike the Raptor (it was on my shortlist)... and the Bison is overkill... so the REAL winner is the standard ZR2 - you get 95% the capability of the Bison at 88% the cost of the Raptor (even cheaper if you factor in dealer markups). It's a no-brainer unless one has a particular itch for something else. In that case, you do you.
I have the extra 95hp itch that the R/R scratches rather nicely !!
as a toyota fan i just don’t get how they priced their trd pro tacoma the same as these. For that price, I’d go with these 2 options. ZR2 bison is also the most appealing exterior styling wise in my opinion. So tempting but just got my 4runner paid off and hate to have car payments again so soon but I’d definitely think of the ZR2 in my future purchase.
they priced the trd tacoma almost 15% more. Crazy.
Toyota has lost their mind. Not to mention, it doesn’t even have a front locker. You get those “cool” seats though that only an infant can sit behind
They overestimated(?) their brand loyalty and sales dominance. That may have worked in the past, but not in this market.
@@MarkPharaoh yup. I drive a 2023 tacoma off-road, but there isn’t a snow balls chance I’d buy the new pro for more money and less features over the ranger raptor
I love how the tacoma wasn't in this video but is living in your heads rent free! 🤣
Love this direct comparison video! You did a phenomenal job on covering all the essential information in such a brief format, great job Ryan!
It is not a direct comparison. Base ZR2 would be direct comparison.
@@frick-n-frack4191 I just meant the side by side comparison of 2 vehicles of similar offerings. I understand the ZR2 would’ve been closer but, I appreciate videos with vehicles that do to some degree cross compete.
I dig the standard ZR2 over either of these two!
If money was not a problem I would get the ZR2 bison and if trying to save money I’ll get the regular ZR2 it’s a beautiful truck all the way around!!
Get the regular ZR2, put 34's (285/75/17's) on it so the spare fits under the bed, add a couple NON-boron-steel aluminum skidplates for the tank and rear diff, maybe an extra 1-2" of lift, and you've got 95% of the Bison at huge savings. The lack of an engine upgrade from the standard ZR2 yet with a Raptor price makes the Bison not worth it to me. That's my plan with my '24.
Seriously, if money was not a problem; it would be the Raptor...The Raptor R.
@@alexmar1382 If money wasn't a problem I'd buy a full-on trophy truck....to sit in my air-conditioned garage next to my Ferrari FXX K Evo.
Man Chevy really nailed the look of the new Colorado’s
You said the key word, Look... Looks ain't going to make that truck better than a Ford truck bro
@@BruceDragon-sf1tr You don’t even realize how stupid you sound. If *looks* can’t move the needle for what makes one of two comparably equipped vehicles “better” than the other, what does? These are $60k+ premium trucks and you’re trying to convince people their designs and looks don’t matter?
Am I missing something or is this Ford fanboyism cope mechanism as you dance around the fact that Ford can’t compete with *gm’s* architectural designs? The Chevrolet is already mechanically and technologically superior to that Ford truck, the better looks are just the icing on that Bison cake.🤷🏽♂️
I just can’t buy a Ford again with all the issues.
If one of those was with N/A engine I would choose it. But with those engines which we have here I would choose Ford. Great review as always. Greetings
Wouldn't be possible to have an N/A engine in this class of truck. To make these power numbers it would need to be a larger v8 which wouldn't fit in this class.
The jeep gladiator and Nissan frontier both have N/A V6s still. 👍🏼 but I would say these new turbo engines even in the form of a 4 cylinder are making very good torque unlike the N/A v6s
@@blacktrucksfly I think a Coyote or especially the L83 pushrod could fit within their respective frames. Remember that the V6 Ecoboosts are pretty wide when taking into account the exhaust manifolds and turbos. Length shouldn’t be an issue either.
@@ALMX5DP I meant more along the lines of fit in the midsize class of trucks. Not that it wouldn’t physically fit.
@@blacktrucksfly ah, though there have been cases where midsize trucks in the past have had V8s. Most recently was the late 00's Colorado with the 5.3, before that I think the last was the Dakota with 4.7, 5.2 and 5.9 magnum V8s. I know many were hoping a Hemi was going to make it into the Gladiator which is similar to the Wrangler which got the venerable 6.4. Nissan was similar where many were hoping the Frontier got the 5.6 Endurance, which made it into the platform mate Pathfinder back in the late 00's as well. I think there is a lot of precedence for putting V8's in smaller vehicles if there werent emissions and such to consider.
Chevy Colorado Bison looks better but Ford Ranger Raptor seems like a better daily driver; adding 35s to the Ranger Raptor should be a factory upgrade.
The most surprising part is finding out the Ranger Raptor is actually $74,000 after dealer markups for those of us that aren't UA-camrs. At which point it loses everything.
We got ours at MSRP.($58k)
I see people on the FB forums buying them all the time at MSRP.
EXACTLY.
Most of the markups I've seen is $5K. There are dealers selling them at MSRP, you just might have to call around to find one. Otherwise, just wait a few months for production to ramp up and the dealer markups should go away.
@@tboneforreal Even then, I'd already be paying $11k more for a comparably-equipped ZR2, and I've seen markups a lot bigger than that. Nope.
I paid MSRP for my ranger raptor. Traded in a 22 Colorado ZR2 for it.
Test drove the 23 ZR2 and it was super nice. However, the main deciding factor for me was the power the raptor has. The ZR2 feels very sluggish when compared to the twin turbo v6.
It just comes down to my dislike of Ford in general, Colorado all damn day.
Finally a real comparison instead of 2 vehicles and reading specs, well done sir!!!! I wish more reviewers would do this format without reading specs. I agree both are bad ass but edge to Raptor for sure.
Bison All Day
Lulz
Neither. I was at this cross road, and I ended up ordering a 2024 Chevy Colorado Trail Boss. it comes standard with the Turbo Max engine (430 torque), 7,700 towing, 1,610 payload, and a factory 2" lift and starts at $39K. Granted, it doesn't have a manual rear locker, but the standard G80 does a good job in most situation. I have been to MOAB twice and have done a few trails there. I spend 99% of my time driving around town and hauling my Jetski/bass boat/trailer. The Colorado offers 4x4 AUTO in the Trail Boss trim for bad weather driving, whereas the FORD only offer that in the upper Raptor trim. Also, only the Colorado is flat towable behind a motorhome. FORD Ranger is NOT flat towable. That was the deal breaker for me. I owned FORDs my entire life and currently drives an F150. IMO, the Trail Boss is the best value in the line up. However, if I had to pick from these 2 trucks, I would go with the regular ZR2 for a lot less money and no FORD dealer markups.
Chevy did a great job at making a Colorado for everyone. The TB is fantastic.
It still blows my mind that both trucks have prop rods for the hoods
I’ll take the ford no matter what
There are aftermarket strut kits on Amazon for the Colorado’s $50-$55 range
Chevy is fine with being the only vehicle approaching affordable. Ford and TRD have their slick tricks, but for those of us with mortgages, kids, electric bills, etc….the Chevy is the only real option. Leading with value still moves cars off dealer lots - it’s good GM still knows that.
So basically the Bison is better, but because you bought a raptor, raptor won lol nice video…
Obvi
That's exactly why the Raptor won he's not going have his own vehicle loose.
You guys sound like Democrats, facts do not matter to you, only emotions.
I'd take the Colorado by far.
the bison was the wrong choice for the test. A regular zr2 would have been more appropriate
It would lose even more…
@@marklihsu Um, not really. The Bison lost on the tire in the bed and price, which a standard ZR2 wouldn't have, or at least been a tie. The standard ZR2 and Raptor are direct competitors, the Bison isn't. Not really up for debate.
@@chadgraber4575the raptor will dickslap them both while going the same places twice as fast and won’t bend the frame 😂
I feel like a Canyon AT4X (non AEV) would be a better model to compare against the Raptor. Heck, you can get an AT4X at around $50K if you catch a decent discount. The Raptor often fetches a dealer markup of $7K to $10K as well.
Ryan, you missed it on this shootout. I'm a Ford guy, but you should take a point away from the Raptor for requiring the "Load box reinforcement kit" if you put a topper of tonneau cover on the Raptor (required per Ford for anything mounted above the bed at 88 pounds or heavier...cmon Ford!! Also you don't mention the Bison has a winch-capable bumper, which can use the Comeup winch from Chevy and maybe a Warn winch too - I haven't seen a winch capable bumper for the Raptor. Give the Bison another point!
True. Winch capable is big. Didn’t know about the load box requirement. That’s annoying.
I agree, thanks for an awesome channel! We were seriously considering the Ranger Raptor with a topper on it till I read about the load braces. The Raptor's motor sounds like a beast
I would go with the standard ZR2. Compares closely to the Raptor and with a good savings.
They really need to bring back the twin turbo diesel for the Bison. That will put it up there at least with the torque and HP of the Ranger Rapture. Bison option actually cost more than the Ranger Rapture. It just needs a better engine to match.
Why wouldn’t you use the standard Colorado zr2? $8000 cheaper, no spare tire in the bed, $800 for side steps and you get cooled seats. I’m shopping both these trucks now and I’m leaning Ranger but the zr2 Colorado in blue looks badass. All the reviewers complain about the lack of space in the back seats, in both trucks, I’m 5/11 and you just move your drivers seat up a little when you have passengers and the room is fine in the back
Rear seating is the same size but a quarter inch even though they show three or 4 inch difference
Isn't the Bison have another inch of lift?
@@OGtruthserum yes it does, it also has better bumpers
How many people would pick the same truck if the badges were swapped? I think many would change picks, with the most picking the raptor design philosophy.
🤤I dream with the Raptor every single day. Soooo out of reach for me at this time. 😮💨
Great video. Love the look of the Bison. But otherwise RR wins.
$65k!? For a four cylinder!? 😳
Your paying a premium for the extra slowness !!
Should have just compared the ZR2, not the ZR2 Bison. Other than rock crawling, the Bison is overkill on payload, bed capacity, and price.
Having rear seat hvac is a big deal too. Availability on the Ford is a real deal killer too, plus the markups.
cant believe he gave the interior to Ford. Interior is monotone and uses parts from the last generation explorer/edge. whole truck was designed half a decade ago. It also has NO rear vents for the passengers. Also leg room is same. you can see he pushed the seat forward. Also complained about having a baja tire in the bed that you can remove.
If I was rock crawling, ZR2. If I was high-speed desert running, Raptor...
Love the comparison content. I only have experience with Gen 1 raptor and Gen 2 raptor.. so far loving my RR like you. I am curious how it compares to the competition. Glad I found you and keep up the great work man!
It was a very fair review.
Now THIS is an awesome upload!!
Ford hands down! I stopped at the headlight switch!! Also you can get an aftermarket 37-gal fuel tank for the Ranger!
Bison all day every day, twice on Sunday. I hate ford interiors, other than the fat guy seat comfort. All the AEV skids, and bumpers , wheels on the Bison are awesome, hydro bumps, winch capable bumper, tailgate storage, 35” tires . I’ll take the Bison
Awesome review! I think it all depends on what you're doing with the truck and where you live. I live in CO and the ZR2 with these options kills on clearance and off-road ability alone, so I'd go ZR2. If I didn't live in a state with massive off-road fun, I'd go Ford because the interior fit and finish is simply better and looks more comfortable. Chevy has always struck out on interior design. I have no idea why they can't make their interiors more ergonomic and there's always a "cheap" factor.
Which one does better on your off road course
He would have to add some points to Bison and that wasn't the intend
They are both outstanding trucks and can off road with the best of them but with that said I am a jeep gladiator guy but if I had to choose one of these It would be the chevy colorado zr2 bison
Standard ZR2 - better value. Best looking and most capable truck on the road or the price
Between those definitely the Ford. But I like the Jeep Gladiator better the either of them.
I'd pick the Chevy. Better equipped for off-roading. And it looks amazing.
Not sure how they compare on towing tech, I know the RR has an integrated brake controller, tow mode and other towing specific features in its software, but not sure how that compares to the Chevy. I’ll likely pick the RR and maybe use the savings to change out the steps to something more protective, add lighting, and bump it to slightly larger tires for additional clearance. Also, from everything I’ve been able to read, the Ford has a better center locker tech and doesn’t rely as heavily on clutches that can get hot and cause reliability issues, but still researching that. Good comparison, thank you!
There's a trailer brake controller in my '24 "regular" ZR2.
I have the 2023 ZR2 and the towing payload is actually 6200 lbs. It comes with 33’s which are just fine (the Z71 has 7700lbs). The turbo sound is more fun than waking up my neighbors (#goodneighbormode) for the mustang. Interior is better than the Gen2 which I owned brand new. MPG’s are the same as the last ZR2 and it only cost $52K. The Bison is for people that want 2” more from tires and a metal bumper. But you could still put the 35”ers on the 2023 ZR2 and it won’t rub. As a previous owner of a ranger, I would have stuck with it, but good luck finding a Raptor Ranger for less than $80-90k. Real life price matters if you actually try to get one of these beauties. In real life the Colorado is the best purchase in my opinion. On the lighter side, glad to see a good NW greater Seattle channel!
I think the standard ZR2 would be a better comparison given the same powertrain as the bison with 33" tires which are the same size as the raptor with a price close to $10K less than the Raptor.
That gap closes when the ZR2 has similar equipment though !!
@@arkhsm I'm just happy that you can get a very capable off road truck for $10-15K less than the Raptor/TRD pro.
Which has the more reliable engine, tho? To me, that holds a lot of weight, especially at those prices.
Both will be average at best.
They should both be good, GM used that in their full-sized trucks for years with great reliability.
Ford..they've been using the Ecoboost platform for awhile now.
@UnknownUser_0000 have a eb in my range rover, and it seems to be reliable.
@@UnknownUser_0000 Chevy, they've been using the 2.7L in their FULL-SIZE trucks for years now with great reliability.
Bison has a 4” inch lift.. important to focus on the details. Also the raptor and bison have the same towing capacity at 5500 lbs. Raptor wins with the payload capacity.. but it’s a smaller truck.
A regular non bison zr2 would be a better comparison here. Similar tire size, and full use of the bed. It’s also much cheaper. I’d be concerned about long term reliability from the 3.0 in the ford. With that said, I think both of these are better than the “new” Tacoma.
I like both but rather save the coin and prefer the less edgy look of the Raptor. It appears to be a better day-to-day vehicle. It is also roomier and I like the seats better, I feel they are more comfortable..
Chevy all day every day and twice on Sunday!
Ram 1500 have coils in the back and a ton of people who own them told me that they have bad stability when loaded.
Also, most likely that ecoboom engine is gonna rattle before it hits 100k and the truck is gonna depreciate much more that the Colorado.
Just check on the fords with the 3.5. They are hard sellers where I live, and that among ford dudes.
I have an AT4X, it’s a good truck, but the RR is so much better for my use cases that I have one on order. And one thing missed on the video is that the Chevy doesn’t have front parking sensors. Incredibly annoying when you’re fitting into your small garage every day.
@@RRr-yl8zr A+ comment, thanks for sharing
Something tells me the RR could be easily fitted by Bronco Sasquatch 35"s or even 37"s of Braptor.
The ZR2 Bison looks so much better …. Ford 💩 the bed on the looks of the Ranger Raptor
I would go Raptor and upgrade rims/tires. The look/off-road capability would be great and I would still save money.
Tough choice for me, based on hearing it from your video. I like both. It would probably come down to appearance for me, I find the chev looks sexier. I may have to test drive both before buying.
I'll take the Chevy (GMC) simply for the Rear Air vents, ventilated seats, and Moonroof.
Bison clears the maverick raptor. And to think the regular ZR2 has everything that has besides steel bumpers, some armor and 35s for 15k less?? The regular ZR2 is a no brainer. The raptor could not get any uglier inside or out.
ZR2 looks so much better, Ford went too soft with the styling of the new Ranger.
I think the Bison is the better rock crawler and the Raptor is better in the fast stuff, that includes the street. If you want to rat around on the street, the Raptors is quicker and handles much better. You just have to figure out what you want to compromise on including the price.
No sunroof in the Ranger! Is it an option? That narrows the price gap by roughly 1,200$. To me, the Bison looks more awesome
The cab link legroom wise in the Ranger raptor is 34.9. The cab link in regards to legroom for the Colorado ZR2 is 34.7 shows about 4 inches difference so somebody's either lying if it's unintentional it's all right but the numbers don't lie and the head room is the same in the rear
The price of entry doesn’t seem accurate. I’m here in Renton Washington and not a single ford dealer is selling these ranger raptors for less than 65k as of July 21/24
Bison looks great but man that price tag is insane both r in my opinion.
Ford trucks have been outsaling Chevrolet since the 80s because its just a better truck the best never rest they just keep getting better Ford power forever baby a real Chevy and dodge killer l love it keep on bringing it
The Chevy is easier to work on compared to that ford if you
Work on your own truck I love the look of the ZR2 I would rather have rock rails then side steps when off roading seeing that is what these trucks were made for the fords
Lockers are I the screen the Chevy has physical buttons for me it the Chevy but I would not get the bison just the zr2
Both of these trucks are awesome but the stone cold facts are that both are novelty items. 99.9% of the end users will never use any of the offroad benefits. That's probably because they cost more than a "luxury" silverado or f150, which will not compete offroad of course but can and will still do real truck shit. Ie: towing, hauling with much more space for people, pets, anything.
The more capable off road pickup lost!??🤔 We don’t care about where the lumbar button is…. Would have loved to see much more off road real world testing.