Generals. It wasn't crap but it was LITERALLY the C&C name slapped on it. :D. It had nothing to do with the brand, it's always bugged me, always will in a way. C&C 4 was crap but at least it was in actual c&c tibetium timeline and not some generic USA vs China vs middle east war.
I know they look a bit different and maybe "terrible" but they have to change the looks on them for their awesome and accurate functions to actually fit with the name. For instance the scorpion-tank: It can actually use the claws to grip the enemy while using the sting! And it can go underground! It truly is a scorpion and if the functions are as awesome as they are.. then who cares if they look a bit messy...?
Looks like a fine game for juniors. It's just most of the C&C gamers are in their 30's and 40's now. It doesn't seem as if the main audience was the target audience of this game's designers.
Given how the community just straight up pretending this game doesn't exist, it is a shame really, because I do like all of the units. Still waiting for a mod that add this gameplay into Red Alert 3, since it is technically the same engine. Only thing exists now that is close to this but not really is Tiberium Crisis, it is a mod for RA2YR, the maker managed to import all of the C&C 4 mechanics into the RA2YR engine, with C&C 3 mechanics for selected factions like ZOCOM and Scrin. But the thing is, no matter how fancy it looks, it is still a 2.5D engine, only an engine like Red Alert 3, or heck, actual C&C 3, would do justice. Sure, there are mods out there that uses these units, but they are not truly how the original units work So basically, I want Tiberium Crisis, but in 3D
Over all I really like this game. I like the wide ranch of units to use(especially aircraft), I think the more mobile gameplay is an interesting touch, and it has some pretty good music, also the unit designs are well interesting. However there are some things I don't like. First of all, the low population count, second, "weapon specialization" (laser good vs. heavy, gun good vs. light, etc.).
i will say that some of the unit desings could have been better like in c&c3 but overall the new gameplay style is a lot of fun and makes the game more strategic and chalenging. i also agree that some fans are overreacting about the "ruined"storyline. i know other different games that sort of dont have a storyline and yet they are great because of the gameplay
Unit cap. All robotic thinge, which still looks goofy. And the enviroment that were look like ripped off armymen rts. No more standard resource gathering and replaced with grab the flag thinge. Not counting somewhat lack of color or customatization. This game didnt cater its old fan, nor the new gamer alike.
Gameplay wise this game had decent potential as a standalone, but certainly not as part of the main line of C&C games, and especially not the finale to the whole series. I know it's been ages, but to this day I am forever more left bitterly disappointed.
@Arkanii1 then you've clearly never played any of the westwood C&C games...I mean...what the hell have they done to the cyborg commando?! The original from tib sun was amazing..."I can smell their fear!"
i wonder if gone are the days of the big base with a superweapon. ill miss the ion cannon and the massive armies we could build. i could care less for prebuilt armies
actually I think C&C4 is a nice game, but can i ask you something. How can u produce your money or your own resources in this game?! because i don't see any harvester in this game.
I don't see what everyone is complaining about, I personally think that a change like this gives gamers a new way to play, many things have been improved however some have been made to look as if they are ruining the purpose and meaning of the entire game but really, it's happened with every game, e.g halo 4 and command and conquers red alert which has changed everything, but yet still gives gamers the enjoyment and anxiety and curiosity to want to use the new game add ons such as new abilities.
Chubby units and structures, population cap, missing resource gathering thing, game mechanics that were-abused-badly, and its too "controlled from the center" thinge. That's few of the many.
C&C without basebuilding is not C&C ... Same for gdi and nod gates/walls from tiberian sun, I loved them and they didnt put it into Tiberium was so sad.
You are right man! The first point, obviously! But yes, Tibs gates were so neat, although they couldn't last long on their own( of course you had towers next to them) they really made the base feel safe from some stray mutant or engineer or something stealthed.
That avatar really looks like he wants a hug or something! haha... I Agree with you...they look...terrible... i'm trying this game today and i didn't hope to be as bad as it looks =(
I'm sure some people enjoy or did enjoy this game. That's okay but to the rest of us we felt more ripped off and left wondering why with no hope of returning to the series. Who knows maybe they'll remaster c&c 3 and have blurr do the graphics
Why remaster C&C 3? It still holds up very well, it could even pass for a "new C&C game" if it was released today. It's not as pretty as RA3 but i think it's due to the murky lighting, deserts and destroyed cities but visuals still look great. I just played a few new RTS's and visually i didn't feel there were much advancements made. Plenty of smaller eye candy but nothing dramatic. Remaster-wise, i rather see Tib Sun and RA2 getting remastered but leave it at that. :). I strongly think remasters should be for something abandoned or that's got tech issues or something well loved but that's aged quite a bit, it has to have something that needs fixing.
@@Erikcleric I can see your point and I agree it looks really good for a game it's age, maybe not a full remaster but some tweaks here and there And maybe some dlc would be crazy
@@thecheezybleezy7036 There is the C&C Online launcher, to be able to play the 3D C&C games online. Sorry, i tried to shorten this, its not enforcing my opinions, just looking at it objectively. 2007, its been 14 years, i cant even believe it! I swear it was yesterday i got it! :D But i doubt its aged that much tech-wise. Since Age of Empires 3, that made physics, anti aliasing, water reflections and just real neat graphics in RTS the norm, the RTS genre hasnt already advanced much since. I played alot of Iron Harvest some time back, while it looks incredible but since its an RTS and you play zoomed out, theres only so much detail you can see but also i didnt find anything "new" graphically, just shinier, prettier, more "doodads" or physics objects perhaps. Im currently waiting for the System Shock Remake, and Diablo 2 RE im gonna get. I dont like to wish for stuff too much, and just kinda appreciate the momen but a remaster of Total Annihilation would be cool, because it just still plays great, still looks great (if you havent played it, go do it, it is sublime) im kinda curious of how Warcraft 1 and 2 would look remastered with some War3 features added in but it might be redundant. :) There are heaps of RTS from late 90s and early 2000s that really could be remastered, cant think of too much currently, i havent played many underdog RTS's or "hidden gems".
So many designs are worse than those from C&C 3. The Scorpion Tank looks like a Childs Idea and the Avator looks almost primitive compared to the older game. Tbh the only Unit I think looks decent enough is the GDI Mastodon, but that's about it.
Probably something to do with the fact that this game is recycled from a canceled chinese-exclusive f2p C&C game that's heavily focused on e-sports. No wonder this game is shit.
@dexrx1 I wonder who would be crying if the N.F.L didnt allow you to touch the football with your hands. It's taking something great and ruining it. No ones a nerd for being angry at that.
loco te diste cuenta que cuando tiras abajo un arbol, (o en su defecto un cactus, en este video) la animacion es una cagada, desde red alert 3 pasa, eso me fije, generals (y la expansion) no pasaba ese tipo de cagada, era mas realista la animacion.
Remastering old games was the right move to make. With C&C3 TW&KW effectively being remasters of Tiberian Sun & having Remastered Graphics Mods for themselves, C&C4 just falls flat on its face with it's own ideas it tries to present. I mean, seriously. Who in the right mind would purposefully move the base closer, so what? You can get more units & infantry across the field faster!? That puts you at a disadvantage!!! WHAT WERE THEY THINKING!?... Hopefully, if they make an alternate C&C4 and consider this one non-canon as well, perhaps a timeline split is in order... Hell, do away with the old C&C4 & bring back the old mechanics! Remake everything brand new again, but keep the original design & flare the old C&C games had, but prevent micromanagement s from being used, & keep the games around to be able to be played online. Just don't repeat what C&C4 is doing nor make any other bad decisions. But with the current game industry, that'll likely scare off a lot of people that wanna make their games their way & for people who didn't grow up with it & shove modern politics & ethics down our throats. And that's how you ruin a good videogame! 😡 Shove in more micromanagements, make people pay to play, I'm well aware you are taking notes, & just make the game feel shitty & bad enough to play. Game devs reading this: Write that down, write that down!!! 👀📝 🧽⭐ That's right, I'm calling you devs out! Prove me right, you cowards! Make my day!!! Or, if you're brave enough, you'll prove my point even further by following my advice! We're all cattle to you anyways! So herd us correctly, or the cattle might end up stampeding with their own games!!! Idiots. This game aged poorly like spoiled milk.
I see everywhere that this game sucks, not CnC and all, but cannot really see any good reasoning..The idea sounds really cool, chosing from one of the three types defense/offense/support, playing with others, sounds like something really requiring actual strategies, to me. So...what's the problem with it?
probably because it's too different from the previous CnC (for example, CnC tiberium wars), where you can make bases and create massive armies. i have played this game and realized that because of the given game mechanics (where you would have surprisingly limited amount of units), it would require you to think even more when creating your forces, because you can't just spam units like in other CnC games. Furthermore, the skirmish system is very different, where we need to capture and defend TCN nodes as long as we can. It did suck when i'm still in a low level, because i would have very few units to choose from, but when in the maximum level (level 20), i actually quite enjoyed it
Dan Le I tried it and it sucks, for me mainly because of the control... I just cannot. WHatever I do it would order all my units to do the action I wanted only 1 unit to do ... and such problems. Unplayable. I asked for refund and bought Red Alert 3 instead.
I played Beta, and never touched it again. It is a capture and hold node gameplay. Hate that shit. The game suffered for it. I played vs a friend, grabbed 2 nodes quickly, and then went for one he had, while he went for one I had. And round and round we went in a circle until I won. We both hated it.
it just doesnt look the same as number three the units look goofy as fuck the units were so much cooler looking in number three and Kanes wrath but the flame tank had a major upgrade lol
+Karl Hans it seems you have no idea what you are talking about. Multiple teams have worked on CnC games. Not surprising considering it was made for almost 20 years under 2 different companies.
+Karl Hans so you are saying that all of them are? Ok... Even the ones on the first one? Or how about TW? Neither of those have a large number of walkers (non in a TD, the juggernaut from TW)
What has Ea done ruined story ruined map depth and above all they took the unit scale and WRECKED IT the only upside i see at all is the aircraft (huge fan of airbased vehicles) but then i saw how most of them attacked and bleh fuck salvaging this game
Panzerfaust88 And the unit designs are not very good either. They look like cartoons with oversized weapons. The flame tank looks like it has a squat pouty face like a pug.
well i have to admit after playing this game all the units look soo cool but seriously they suck, if i want to kill one guy using an avatar against him is suicide, I HAVE TO USE THIS STUPID LITTLE THING WITH SHOTGUNS. Plus running over men is gone
C&C 3 vs C&C 4 C&C 3-you can build buildings, it can have infantry, looks like a serious game, a deep story C&C 4-you cant build buildings, no infantry, looks cartoonish, ruined the story WINNER-C&C3 so if your gonna buy a c&C game get c&c 3 but if you hate EA buy the old ones
I like the idea but not as a C&C game these concepts could make for a great multiplayer RTS or somthing and the whole game would be really fast paced
Surprise, that's how it turned out
Hey you forget the engineer,avenger,vertigo,black hand and the other units in NOD arsenal
I hope they didn't remove the flame tanks quotes like "NO ONE ESCAPES THE HEAT!" cuz thats a deal breaker for me :P
This game fucked up the whole CNC genre
Thanks EA
4:50 What have they done to my boy.
Felt more like a game that knew it was shit and slapped the command and conquer name just to sell this rubish
Cz e me is lmk lxkumstmxnygmzr ,g ekgkgxtlh🤒😋🤷🙅🤷🙅🤩😡🙄🤫😝😟😠🤯😠🥺🤯🥺😠🤯🥺😠🤯🥺🤤😠😮😬🤯😳😦😤
Generals. It wasn't crap but it was LITERALLY the C&C name slapped on it. :D. It had nothing to do with the brand, it's always bugged me, always will in a way.
C&C 4 was crap but at least it was in actual c&c tibetium timeline and not some generic USA vs China vs middle east war.
why is it that most of the nod units looked cooler in kanes wrath ?
Our allies for Kane!
I know they look a bit different and maybe "terrible" but they have to change the looks on them for their awesome and accurate functions to actually fit with the name.
For instance the scorpion-tank: It can actually use the claws to grip the enemy while using the sting! And it can go underground! It truly is a scorpion and if the functions are as awesome as they are.. then who cares if they look a bit messy...?
Looks like a fine game for juniors. It's just most of the C&C gamers are in their 30's and 40's now. It doesn't seem as if the main audience was the target audience of this game's designers.
Only the best for the brootherhood !
The Obelisk of Light seems powerful here but when I played it. The damage got weaker
damn where the basilisk and vertigo ?
i'm glad that i bought cnc3
cnc4 thats not cnc we dont know what that is DESTROY IT
I see no C&C
Given how the community just straight up pretending this game doesn't exist, it is a shame really, because I do like all of the units. Still waiting for a mod that add this gameplay into Red Alert 3, since it is technically the same engine.
Only thing exists now that is close to this but not really is Tiberium Crisis, it is a mod for RA2YR, the maker managed to import all of the C&C 4 mechanics into the RA2YR engine, with C&C 3 mechanics for selected factions like ZOCOM and Scrin. But the thing is, no matter how fancy it looks, it is still a 2.5D engine, only an engine like Red Alert 3, or heck, actual C&C 3, would do justice. Sure, there are mods out there that uses these units, but they are not truly how the original units work
So basically, I want Tiberium Crisis, but in 3D
these units are like designed by kids, i mean just look at 0:50 what infantry is that?
Over all I really like this game. I like the wide ranch of units to use(especially aircraft), I think the more mobile gameplay is an interesting touch, and it has some pretty good music, also the unit designs are well interesting. However there are some things I don't like. First of all, the low population count, second, "weapon specialization" (laser good vs. heavy, gun good vs. light, etc.).
The only redeeming feature is... WAIT. It has no redeeming features
Ryan Cheong I mean they kinda brought back the mammoth mk2
The soundtrack
there is no redeemer, kane lost his tech
i will say that some of the unit desings could have been better like in c&c3 but overall the new gameplay style is a lot of fun and makes the game more strategic and chalenging. i also agree that some fans are overreacting about the "ruined"storyline. i know other different games that sort of dont have a storyline and yet they are great because of the gameplay
Unit cap. All robotic thinge, which still looks goofy. And the enviroment that were look like ripped off armymen rts. No more standard resource gathering and replaced with grab the flag thinge. Not counting somewhat lack of color or customatization. This game didnt cater its old fan, nor the new gamer alike.
So i came back to my 8 year old comment to say that i was i little idiot. This game sucks.
@markosimunic4770 😂😂😂
Gameplay wise this game had decent potential as a standalone, but certainly not as part of the main line of C&C games, and especially not the finale to the whole series. I know it's been ages, but to this day I am forever more left bitterly disappointed.
@Neoparris Yeah it does look ridiculous, doesn't it?
Imagine the Mammoth Tank riding around WITH fur and a trunk!
@Arkanii1 then you've clearly never played any of the westwood C&C games...I mean...what the hell have they done to the cyborg commando?! The original from tib sun was amazing..."I can smell their fear!"
well they fuck up avatars wtf are those things now lol
i wonder if gone are the days of the big base with a superweapon. ill miss the ion cannon and the massive armies we could build. i could care less for prebuilt armies
Ion cannon and nod nuclear strike still exist in this game.
@vidioinspector ok the story was bad didnt kane already went through the scrin portal in C&C 3 kanes wrath
4:39 YOU SHALL NOT PASS
What do you mean scorpion two-shoting a mastodon
C&C 4? What is that some kind of fanfiction?
Non-canon everything
U said unit showcase obelisk of light is not a unit lol
To me it looks like none of the units can take more than 4 hits from any other unit, did they make them all out of paper?
That has always been a Nod trait
actually I think C&C4 is a nice game, but can i ask you something. How can u produce your money or your own resources in this game?! because i don't see any harvester in this game.
Its pumped out to you from any supply base unseen on the map. Theoretically it is for a competitive gameplay.
yeah, im in love with the salamander
@estrategax22 the scrin were defeated and thrown offworld in the last game. they dont appear in this game
The only reason I have this game is because it came in the bundle with the rest of the cnc games
I don't see what everyone is complaining about, I personally think that a change like this gives gamers a new way to play, many things have been improved however some have been made to look as if they are ruining the purpose and meaning of the entire game but really, it's happened with every game, e.g halo 4 and command and conquers red alert which has changed everything, but yet still gives gamers the enjoyment and anxiety and curiosity to want to use the new game add ons such as new abilities.
Chubby units and structures, population cap, missing resource gathering thing, game mechanics that were-abused-badly, and its too "controlled from the center" thinge. That's few of the many.
I love the flametank :D
the salamander reminds me of the mothership on scrin
Yea
Kirov on steroids.
RTS game developer tries to follow MOBA trends but forgot they control an army, not a single unit, causing classic RTS player feel disgusting.
C&C without basebuilding is not C&C ... Same for gdi and nod gates/walls from tiberian sun, I loved them and they didnt put it into Tiberium was so sad.
You are right man! The first point, obviously!
But yes, Tibs gates were so neat, although they couldn't last long on their own( of course you had towers next to them) they really made the base feel safe from some stray mutant or engineer or something stealthed.
@@Erikcleric Just the sound of it when going up an down is so nostalgic :D
@@Hunter-jo8ud yes it added alot to the dark almost Aliens-like vibe of the game.
The people responsible for the design in this game should be saked and then the people that sacked them should be sacked.
0:01
Name song plz
LOL i like how the support "CRAWLER" floats
the offensive crawler has the exact same purpose as the elephant had in halo wars...
obelisk of light , the new prism tower (ra2) or spectrum tower (ra3)
WTF happened to the units?
I'm glad i only paid 9 euros for the game :)!
Overpowered obelisks of light and scorpian tank much?
That avatar really looks like he wants a hug or something! haha...
I Agree with you...they look...terrible... i'm trying this game today and i didn't hope to be as bad as it looks =(
support crawler but it floats
I'm sure some people enjoy or did enjoy this game. That's okay but to the rest of us we felt more ripped off and left wondering why with no hope of returning to the series. Who knows maybe they'll remaster c&c 3 and have blurr do the graphics
Why remaster C&C 3? It still holds up very well, it could even pass for a "new C&C game" if it was released today. It's not as pretty as RA3 but i think it's due to the murky lighting, deserts and destroyed cities but visuals still look great. I just played a few new RTS's and visually i didn't feel there were much advancements made. Plenty of smaller eye candy but nothing dramatic. Remaster-wise, i rather see Tib Sun and RA2 getting remastered but leave it at that. :).
I strongly think remasters should be for something abandoned or that's got tech issues or something well loved but that's aged quite a bit, it has to have something that needs fixing.
@@Erikcleric I can see your point and I agree it looks really good for a game it's age, maybe not a full remaster but some tweaks here and there
And maybe some dlc would be crazy
@@thecheezybleezy7036 There is the C&C Online launcher, to be able to play the 3D C&C games online.
Sorry, i tried to shorten this, its not enforcing my opinions, just looking at it objectively.
2007, its been 14 years, i cant even believe it! I swear it was yesterday i got it! :D But i doubt its aged that much tech-wise.
Since Age of Empires 3, that made physics, anti aliasing, water reflections and just real neat graphics in RTS the norm, the RTS genre hasnt already advanced much since.
I played alot of Iron Harvest some time back, while it looks incredible but since its an RTS and you play zoomed out, theres only so much detail you can see but also i didnt find anything "new" graphically, just shinier, prettier, more "doodads" or physics objects perhaps.
Im currently waiting for the System Shock Remake, and Diablo 2 RE im gonna get.
I dont like to wish for stuff too much, and just kinda appreciate the momen but a remaster of Total Annihilation would be cool, because it just still plays great, still looks great (if you havent played it, go do it, it is sublime) im kinda curious of how Warcraft 1 and 2 would look remastered with some War3 features added in but it might be redundant. :)
There are heaps of RTS from late 90s and early 2000s that really could be remastered, cant think of too much currently, i havent played many underdog RTS's or "hidden gems".
This looks more like chess than real fighting. What the hell happened to C&C?
So many designs are worse than those from C&C 3. The Scorpion Tank looks like a Childs Idea and the Avator looks almost primitive compared to the older game.
Tbh the only Unit I think looks decent enough is the GDI Mastodon, but that's about it.
Probably something to do with the fact that this game is recycled from a canceled chinese-exclusive f2p C&C game that's heavily focused on e-sports. No wonder this game is shit.
@@Razgriz_01 can you give me the detail?. Is it the thing on google playstore-I forgot the title-?.
@dexrx1 I wonder who would be crying if the N.F.L didnt allow you to touch the football with your hands. It's taking something great and ruining it. No ones a nerd for being angry at that.
4:39
YOU SHALL NOT PASS
A decent game by itself, but a shitty C&C
I am an outsider, me like this game:)
and where is the scrins?
loco te diste cuenta que cuando tiras abajo un arbol, (o en su defecto un cactus, en este video) la animacion es una cagada, desde red alert 3 pasa, eso me fije, generals (y la expansion) no pasaba ese tipo de cagada, era mas realista la animacion.
NOO! NOT THE FLAME TANK!!! THEY MADE it look fat and stubby -,-
fence as to change the avatar
i think the new skill from the stealth tank is great^^ cloaking nearby vehicle's
Support *Crawler*... flying unit..
Obelisk*
Why are there good Kiwi gaming sites,firearms sites,car sites and just good sites.
I mean new zealanders have heaps of stakes in gaming!
It's 15 year old counter part (Tiberian Sun) is better than this garbage.
Remastering old games was the right move to make. With C&C3 TW&KW effectively being remasters of Tiberian Sun & having Remastered Graphics Mods for themselves, C&C4 just falls flat on its face with it's own ideas it tries to present.
I mean, seriously. Who in the right mind would purposefully move the base closer, so what? You can get more units & infantry across the field faster!? That puts you at a disadvantage!!! WHAT WERE THEY THINKING!?...
Hopefully, if they make an alternate C&C4 and consider this one non-canon as well, perhaps a timeline split is in order... Hell, do away with the old C&C4 & bring back the old mechanics! Remake everything brand new again, but keep the original design & flare the old C&C games had, but prevent micromanagement s from being used, & keep the games around to be able to be played online. Just don't repeat what C&C4 is doing nor make any other bad decisions.
But with the current game industry, that'll likely scare off a lot of people that wanna make their games their way & for people who didn't grow up with it & shove modern politics & ethics down our throats. And that's how you ruin a good videogame! 😡 Shove in more micromanagements, make people pay to play, I'm well aware you are taking notes, & just make the game feel shitty & bad enough to play.
Game devs reading this: Write that down, write that down!!!
👀📝
🧽⭐
That's right, I'm calling you devs out! Prove me right, you cowards! Make my day!!! Or, if you're brave enough, you'll prove my point even further by following my advice! We're all cattle to you anyways! So herd us correctly, or the cattle might end up stampeding with their own games!!! Idiots.
This game aged poorly like spoiled milk.
i turne off sound
@desolatesoul87 Oh, played almost all C&C games, Kane's Wrath is still my favorite.
I see everywhere that this game sucks, not CnC and all, but cannot really see any good reasoning..The idea sounds really cool, chosing from one of the three types defense/offense/support, playing with others, sounds like something really requiring actual strategies, to me. So...what's the problem with it?
probably because it's too different from the previous CnC (for example, CnC tiberium wars), where you can make bases and create massive armies. i have played this game and realized that because of the given game mechanics (where you would have surprisingly limited amount of units), it would require you to think even more when creating your forces, because you can't just spam units like in other CnC games. Furthermore, the skirmish system is very different, where we need to capture and defend TCN nodes as long as we can. It did suck when i'm still in a low level, because i would have very few units to choose from, but when in the maximum level (level 20), i actually quite enjoyed it
Dan Le I tried it and it sucks, for me mainly because of the control... I just cannot. WHatever I do it would order all my units to do the action I wanted only 1 unit to do ... and such problems. Unplayable. I asked for refund and bought Red Alert 3 instead.
Try play cc3 and you will know.
I played Beta, and never touched it again. It is a capture and hold node gameplay. Hate that shit. The game suffered for it. I played vs a friend, grabbed 2 nodes quickly, and then went for one he had, while he went for one I had. And round and round we went in a circle until I won. We both hated it.
just got the game :D
I hate EA for doing this to Command&Conquer -.-
it just doesnt look the same as number three the units look goofy as fuck the units were so much cooler looking in number three and Kanes wrath but the flame tank had a major upgrade lol
Well, the game is shit but I'd want to see Scorpion and upgraded Avatar from CNC4 in some more CNC3 mods.
reminds me of an old show name zoids
they were just trying to buy the old C&C lovers with familiar look of units... thats all...
...and there goes my jaw
these units are horrible, ea ruined the cnc series.
+A Goharpour It seems like the devs that work on cnc series are transformers fanboys and weeaboos.
+Karl Hans it seems you have no idea what you are talking about. Multiple teams have worked on CnC games. Not surprising considering it was made for almost 20 years under 2 different companies.
+Karl Hans so you are saying that all of them are? Ok... Even the ones on the first one? Or how about TW? Neither of those have a large number of walkers (non in a TD, the juggernaut from TW)
Dubsy 102
when did i mention walkers or juggernauts?
+Karl Hans I thought that's what you referring to by 'transformers'
Lol @ the Commando. They haven't even synchronised the firing protocol with it's animation xD Looks like shit.
Yep, sometimes there's a few second delay before he starts firing his laser when targeting an enemy
What has Ea done ruined story ruined map depth and above all they took the unit scale and WRECKED IT the only upside i see at all is the aircraft (huge fan of airbased vehicles) but then i saw how most of them attacked and bleh fuck salvaging this game
this game is so fucking weak. their ruined tiberian story line with that shitty game with even worst ending
Panzerfaust88 And the unit designs are not very good either. They look like cartoons with oversized weapons. The flame tank looks like it has a squat pouty face like a pug.
And the cyborg commando.....i just stick with Tiberain sun one
well i have to admit after playing this game all the units look soo cool but seriously they suck, if i want to kill one guy using an avatar against him is suicide, I HAVE TO USE THIS STUPID LITTLE THING WITH SHOTGUNS. Plus running over men is gone
If you want a good RTS get warhammer dawn of war 1. Not 2. Sync kills 'n' shit, it is awesome.
wow seriously, a megazord from power rangers looks better than avatar,damn it ruins!
Knod
the hell did they do to my tank!?! This is LITERAL flaming garbage!!
@TheMuffinDoctor actually obelisks suck in this game lol
This is not the NOD army i remember >=(
C&C 4... a game so fucking bad, it killed the series as a whole.
CnC Remastered (Tib Dawn and RA1) has un-killed the series, and Jim Vessella is becoming more in-touch with the CnC communities than you would assume.
C&C 3 vs C&C 4
C&C 3-you can build buildings, it can have infantry, looks like a serious game, a deep story
C&C 4-you cant build buildings, no infantry, looks cartoonish, ruined the story
WINNER-C&C3
so if your gonna buy a c&C game get c&c 3 but if you hate EA buy the old ones
Actually you can still build structure and churned infantries. But, yeah, virtually all units looks sluggish and chubby.
hopefully ea will recover from this shit hole and rebuild the new command and conquers... or else the seris is fiinshed D:
Matthew Powell *'Curb Your Enthusiasm' music plays*
No, I think not.
Eduardo Rivera have you seen CnC Rivals?
@oklahomachevyboy Game's awesome? First (and i hope the last time) when somebody calls this game good!
what a ...
man this command and conquer sucks u have to unlock the units in skirmish now,u have a population limit,u use 1 mobile building,and the campaign sucks
the units just look so poorly designed, childish and tacky...in comparison, C&C3 seems amazing...and that's saying something :(
Worst C&C game ever made!! what a shitty way to kill off a franchise.... much sad face
So from what I can see, the GDI are underpowered, the NOD's vehicles look like shit and the game is a crappy cartoon?
thank you ea for ruining another game...
im glad I didnt bought this piece of crap
Omg the design here so bad actually if compared with cnc3
Ew
Disgusting