Thank you Father for being a light in this great darkness enabling us to find our way back home. We are grateful to you and our Father for not leaving us orphans.
Bp. Tissier was indeed a brilliant mind and a very dear soul. Pity something broke within him as you indicate. RIP! Thank you, Fr. Chazal, for this eulogy..
Excellent sermon/talk! Now we need Father Chazal to speak out against Bishop Williamson errors, we don’t need another of Archbishop Lefebvre’s Bishops to weaken in his stance on the Novous Ordo.
Hewko & John pffier are worse then sandborn and Jenkins & of the same ilk. Hewko & John have nothing of tradition imposing b.o.d & calling sedevacantism heresy is never something the Archbishop encouraged.Bishop Williamson knows the stances of Lefebvre better than either of Them. The issue is that like FR.Feeney saying justification was possible with desire Lefebvre didn’t go far enough against the v2 sect because of the available information so we get brother Andre and those two Priest’s as consequences. People who learn all the wrong lessons from the men they claimed to look up to.
Arch. Lefebvre taught souls may be saved in other religions but "by the Catholic Church" which is a heresy violating extra ecclesium nulla salus. ua-cam.com/video/b1v5t0xbcUo/v-deo.htmlsi=31M2oW3Pqa60EEg-
It's the true: the car is on neutral, and is slowing down. Meanwhile, sedevacantism is growing fast, in USA, Brazil, Argentine, Mexico, Canada, Colombia, and know in Spain with the Belorado Clarissa Sisters.
If he's in the neo-SSPX, just ask who ordained him as a priest. Only four bishops from the original SSPX were consecrated by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, with Bishop Antônio de Castro Mayer as co-consecrator: Bernard Tissier de Mallerais (1945, France), Richard Williamson (1940, England), Alfonso de Galarreta (1957, Spain), and Bernard Fellay (1958, Switzerland). If the priest came from the Novus Ordo and joined the SSPX, make sure he had his ordination validated by a traditional bishop. Novus Ordo ordinations and consecrations are doubtful, so they may or may not be real priests.
If you're saying the priest is pro-Novus Ordo or neo-SSPX, or that he supports the SSPX's 2012 crisis and favors the new direction for normalization with Rome, then he likely agrees with the 2012 doctrinal preamble. If this neo-SSPX priest dislikes the Resistance priests, it means he's aligned with Bishop Fellay and his group of liberal priests, following modernist ideas. Not all SSPX priests agree with this, but many are tired of the long struggle to uphold Tradition against modernist Rome. Some think it would be easier to continue the fight once SSPX is fully normalized. The problem is that they have already compromised and are playing with fire by engaging with modernist Rome, thinking it's still a good fight for the salvation of souls. But in reality, it's simply a compromise.
@@prevatican2talks do you think the neo sspx priest will tell me he was ordained by the 4bishops or from a novus ordo? It will be easier for me if you could tell me who are the novus ordo priest in the neo sspx philippines please i am avoiding those NO priest
@@isaihisaih2024Fr. Fallarcuna was ordained by Bishop de Galaretta (one of the 4 SSPX Bishops) in Australia in 2005! Why would be be doubtful??? Do your research before making accusations that he is not a validly ordained priest.
Where did Padre Chazal express sedevacantist views in his sermons or Mass? I haven't noticed anything like that-he’s actually one of the strongest voices against sedevacantism and even wrote a book to refute it, which you can find here: Contra Cekadam: ca-rc.com/contra-cekadam. These sermons were typical in the SSPX back then, especially during the time of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, who often delivered even stronger sermons than Father Chazal
Fr. Chazal is a Defender of Tradition just like The Great AB Lefebvre and all the saints before him. @Thesenhorcaioo you are a modernist wannabe theologian, get back in the kitchen where you belong. Read AB Lefebvres books and you will realize the The Resistance priests are saying exactly what he said. We will keep you in our prayers.
What an excellent sermon. Thanks so much Fr Chazal. You are truly a great priest in these times. God bless you.
God bless you Father, a great sermon. Archbishop Lefebvre would be so proud of you.
Thank you Father for being a light in this great darkness enabling us to find our way back home. We are grateful to you and our Father for not leaving us orphans.
I just subscribed to your channel. Thanks for posting this important sermon!
Excellent! Bravo!
Bp. Tissier was indeed a brilliant mind and a very dear soul. Pity something broke within him as you indicate. RIP! Thank you, Fr. Chazal, for this eulogy..
Fr Chazal would make an excellent Bishop!
God Bless you Father
Excellent sermon/talk!
Now we need Father Chazal to speak out against Bishop Williamson errors, we don’t need another of Archbishop Lefebvre’s Bishops to weaken in his stance on the Novous Ordo.
Hewko camp?
@@prevatican2talks
I would say the camp of Tradition.
Hewko & John pffier are worse then sandborn and Jenkins & of the same ilk. Hewko & John have nothing of tradition imposing b.o.d & calling sedevacantism heresy is never something the Archbishop encouraged.Bishop Williamson knows the stances of Lefebvre better than either of Them. The issue is that like FR.Feeney saying justification was possible with desire Lefebvre didn’t go far enough against the v2 sect because of the available information so we get brother Andre and those two Priest’s as consequences. People who learn all the wrong lessons from the men they claimed to look up to.
Arch. Lefebvre taught souls may be saved in other religions but "by the Catholic Church" which is a heresy violating extra ecclesium nulla salus.
ua-cam.com/video/b1v5t0xbcUo/v-deo.htmlsi=31M2oW3Pqa60EEg-
It's the true: the car is on neutral, and is slowing down.
Meanwhile, sedevacantism is growing fast, in USA, Brazil, Argentine, Mexico, Canada, Colombia, and know in Spain with the Belorado Clarissa Sisters.
How do i know if the priest in the neo sspx is a novus ordo? Can u please give me a list here in philippines? Please
If he's in the neo-SSPX, just ask who ordained him as a priest. Only four bishops from the original SSPX were consecrated by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, with Bishop Antônio de Castro Mayer as co-consecrator: Bernard Tissier de Mallerais (1945, France), Richard Williamson (1940, England), Alfonso de Galarreta (1957, Spain), and Bernard Fellay (1958, Switzerland).
If the priest came from the Novus Ordo and joined the SSPX, make sure he had his ordination validated by a traditional bishop. Novus Ordo ordinations and consecrations are doubtful, so they may or may not be real priests.
If you're saying the priest is pro-Novus Ordo or neo-SSPX, or that he supports the SSPX's 2012 crisis and favors the new direction for normalization with Rome, then he likely agrees with the 2012 doctrinal preamble. If this neo-SSPX priest dislikes the Resistance priests, it means he's aligned with Bishop Fellay and his group of liberal priests, following modernist ideas.
Not all SSPX priests agree with this, but many are tired of the long struggle to uphold Tradition against modernist Rome. Some think it would be easier to continue the fight once SSPX is fully normalized. The problem is that they have already compromised and are playing with fire by engaging with modernist Rome, thinking it's still a good fight for the salvation of souls. But in reality, it's simply a compromise.
@@prevatican2talks do you think the neo sspx priest will tell me he was ordained by the 4bishops or from a novus ordo? It will be easier for me if you could tell me who are the novus ordo priest in the neo sspx philippines please i am avoiding those NO priest
I wanted to know if fr. G. F@larcuna was reordained? I know some are ordained by the 4 bishops...some i have doubts in there ordinations
@@isaihisaih2024Fr. Fallarcuna was ordained by Bishop de Galaretta (one of the 4 SSPX Bishops) in Australia in 2005! Why would be be doubtful??? Do your research before making accusations that he is not a validly ordained priest.
Why did Father condemn bi-ritualism? Did he mean TLM/Novus Ordo or TLM/Divine Liturgy?
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤👏👏👏👏👏👏👏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
The resistance is crazy. You guys are going full sedevacantist. So much internal fights, so much pride. This is completely ridiculous and pointless.
The normal route for the resistance
Where did Padre Chazal express sedevacantist views in his sermons or Mass? I haven't noticed anything like that-he’s actually one of the strongest voices against sedevacantism and even wrote a book to refute it, which you can find here: Contra Cekadam: ca-rc.com/contra-cekadam. These sermons were typical in the SSPX back then, especially during the time of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, who often delivered even stronger sermons than Father Chazal
How can a faithful Roman Catholic not be Sedevecantist. Heretics cannot be true Pope's. V2 is the religion of Freemasonry.
Fr. Chazal is a Defender of Tradition just like The Great AB Lefebvre and all the saints before him. @Thesenhorcaioo you are a modernist wannabe theologian, get back in the kitchen where you belong. Read AB Lefebvres books and you will realize the The Resistance priests are saying exactly what he said. We will keep you in our prayers.
This is a strange homily I wonder how important it is to complain about other people in a homily.
It's not really complaing, it's about putting people on guard.
He always does this regularly.....he was a disciplined priest so.... enough said