If you haven't tried the patreon, you're missing out: www.patreon.com/josephcarlson Patreon includes: Full access to Qualtrim.com Over 100 exclusive videos, and new ones every week. Access to a fun community where we chat together every day. It's zero risk, comes with a free trial and cancel any time. Join over 6,000 Patreon members and try it out!
Some AI Stocks are pretty unstable at the moment, but if you do the right math, you should be just fine. Bloomberg and other finance media have been recording cases of folks gaining over 250k just in a matter of weeks/couple months, so I think there are a lot of wealth transfer in this downtime if you know where to look.
you’re right! The current market might give opportunities to maximize profit within a short term, but in order to execute such strategy , you must be a skilled practitioner
It's often true that people underestimate the importance of financial advisors until they feel the negative effects of emotional decision-making. I remember a few summers ago, after a tough divorce, when I needed a boost for my struggling business. I researched and found a licensed advisor who diligently helped grow my reserves despite inflation. Consequently, my reserves increased from $275k to around $750k.
There are a handful of experts in the field. I've experimented with a few over the past years, but I've stuck with ‘’ Melissa Terri Swayne” for about five years now, and her performance has been consistently impressive. She’s quite known in her field, look-her up.
The main focus for markets now is Nvidia, which has powered a large chunk of the S&P 500’s recent earnings. Nvidia’s stock, up more than 90% this year, rose 2.5% in New York on Monday, sending the Nasdaq 100 index to another record high. I'm still looking for companies to make additions to my $350K portfolio, to boost performance. Here for ideas...
I think the safest strategy is to diversify investments. Like spreading investments across different asset classes, like bonds, real estate, and international stocks, they can reduce the impact of a market meltdown
A lot of folks downplay the role of advlsors until being burnt by their own emotions. I remember couple summers back, after my lengthy divorce, I needed a good boost to help my business stay afloat, hence I researched for licensed advisors and came across someone of utmost qualifications. She's helped grow my reserve notwithstanding inflation, from $275k to $850K
This is definitely considerable! think you could suggest any professional/advisors i can get on the phone with? i'm in dire need of proper portfolio allocation
Strong BUY. Still early innings. NVIDIA is the dominant leader in AI and the preferred technology partner globally. Even w new competition on the horizon, NVIDIA is far ahead of the competition. 85% market share. 76% margin. Unrivaled demand for new Blackwell chip. Demand far exceeds production for Blackwell through to 2025 and beyond. No competitor has anything close to Blackwell. And forward P/E is about 33 (cheap for a high growth stock). Buy this stock and wait. You will be rewarded.
This is Interesting because i bought NVIDIA around September last year. The company is selling shovels in a gold rush. It accounted for almost 80% of my market return last year, and I'm sure this year will present other interesting stocks.
When it comes to investment, diversification is key. That is why I have my interests set on key sectors based on performance and projected growth. They range from the EV sector, renewable energy, Tech and Health (AMD) alongside coins, and gold. I'm also working on an investment plan that includes AI looking into Nvidia, MSFT, Alphabet stocks among others with my Fin. Advisor, . It's been a year and half of steady growth.
@@joshbarney114 I appreciate the implementation of ideas and strategies that result to unmeasurable progress. Being heavily liquid, I'd rather not reinvent the wheel, thus the search for a reputable advisor, mind sharing info of this person guiding you please?
Finding financial advisors like Marisa Breton Dollard who can assist you shape your portfolio would be a very creative option. There will be difficult times ahead, and prudent personal money management will be essential to navigating them.
Excellent share, just inputted Marisa Breton Dollard on the internet, spotted her consulting page ranked top and was able to schedule a call session. Ive seen commentaries about advisors but not one looks this phenomenal.
Obviously AI stocks will dominate 2024. Why I prefer NVIDIA is that they are better placed to maintain long term growth potential, and provide a platform for other AI companies. I know someone who has made more than 200% from NVIDIA. I'll also take these other recommendations you made.
To minimise risks and maximise growth, I think investors should begin with S&P 500/ETFs for a strong foundation, diversify across asset classes, and continue with disciplined, frequent investing.
No doubt, having the right plan is invaluable, my portfolio is well-matched for every season of the market and recently hit 100% rise from early last year. I and my CFP are working on a 7 figure ballpark goal, tho this could take till Q3 2024.
AI stocks will dominate 2024. Why I prefer NVIDIA is that they are better placed to maintain long term growth potential, and provide a platform for other AI companies. I know someone who has made more than 200% from NVIDIA. I'll also take these other recommendations you made.
...Let's face it... buying more st0cks & index funds during stock market c0rrections and bear markets is scary. Which makes it really hard to do for most people like me. I have 260k i want to transfer into an s&p but its hard to bite the bullet and d0 it.
...I agree with you. I started out with investing on my own, but I lost a lot of money. I was able to pull out about $200k after the 2020 crash. I invested the money using an analyst, and in seven months, I raked in almost $673,000
I've had majority of my holdings in ETFs, tech stocks and I've had 45% increase in my portfolio, especially with Nvidia P/E (price to earnings ratio) adding few others, personally, MICHELE KATHERINE SINGH take good care of my holdings.
This recommendation is coming at the right time because i am literally grasping for straws atm! I verified her online and scheduled a phone call with her.
I agree that many people are considering NVDA as the "Stock of the year." However, I'm curious about which stocks could potentially become the next META in terms of growth over the next decade. I've allocated $200k for investment, aiming to retire comfortably.
AI is already showing tremendous potential. To achieve long-term success, like META, it's crucial to avoid impulsive decisions based on short-term market fluctuations. Prioritize patience nd a long-term perspective, nd consider consulting a fin advsr for informed investment decisions.
Facing a similar situation, I sought advice from an invęstment advisęr. Through portfolio restructuring and diversification with good ETFs, S&P 500 and growth stocks, I've turned my portfolio around from $200k to over $800k in a few years.
Your invt-adviser must be really good, I hope it's okay to inquire if you're still collaborating with the same invt-adviser and how I can get in touch with them?
Jennifer Alaine is the licensed fiduciary I use. Just research the name. You’d find necessary details to work with a correspondence to set up an appointment.
Thank you! I entered her full name into my browser, and her website came out on top. I filled her form and scheduled a call . i hope she gets back to me soon.
@@Ryan-pp4bx Wouldn't touch Nvidia bc i'm not close to their fundamentals but growing business by three digits YOY and having damn near 80% GM is very impressive. I'm surprised their PE isn't over 100.
I think you are misreading the Amazon NVIDIA partnership. NVIDIA is not building and operating their own data centers, they are basically just offering a more managed service on top of AWS, meaning AWS still gets paid to rent the space. If AWS gets their chips to a level that it can compete with NVIDIA, then what’s to stop them from pushing them out of their data centers? Also, you are forgetting that NVIDIA needs AWS because they are the largest CSP and have all the data. GPUs are worthless if you don’t have the training datasets, all of which AWS has.
" If AWS gets their chips to a level that it can compete with NVIDIA"...you defintely going full hard delusional. AWS has tough competition, you act like Amazon is the only hyperscaler in town that can build and operate their own data centers....Google, MSFT, Oracle. Building and operating a data center without Nvidia chips, Amazon data centers are useless against the competition. Also, anybody can build a datacenter if they have the money, It's mostly comprised of 3rd party suppliers/vendors and. Alot of companies outsource datacenter build outs to Oracle. But nobody can create a chip like Nvidia.
@@George-f8h The bullying of employees. I worked in a warehouse for years and the issue is the opposite. I once had a supervisor I didn’t meet until his last day, and it wasn’t unusual for me to not see them for weeks.
The beautiful thing about Nvidia is that they're growing like this with only 29,600 employees that are doing quite well financially. Nvidia doesn't over hire just to turn around and fire a lot of people.
Additional earnings reports from major tech companies, driven by Nvidia, coupled with trader FOMO, could fuel a resurgence in market buying pressure. I'm considering investing over $300k, but I'm uncertain about risk mitigation strategies.
Nvidia stock is roaring like many did during the 1990s bubble. But this time around, the hype around new chips is happening in a more mature demand environment.
Agreed, After taking charge of my portfolio in early 2017, i stumbled into losses. Upon realizing that a change was necessary, I consulted a fiduciary advisor in 2020 and since then my $1.2m portfolio has gained 28% annually through restructuring and diversification using dividend equities, ETFs, mutual funds, and REITs.
Great gains there! mind sharing details of your advisor pleas? i've started gaining more cash flow with my employment and looking at putting money into stocks and alternative assets that can help build wealth over time
what are you talking about? you needed a special plan to have blackberry service. they also sold software so that companies could run their own blackberry servers which had per device fees. they had “as a service” income before it was a thing. blackberry messenger with group chats existed before whatsapp, imessage and facebook messenger where a thing. they had superb software but they missed the train when the iphone came out and didn’t come up with devices which people wanted.
Nvidia already has a huge software moat, they don't need to necessarily transition to "sell" software. It's like how Apple doesn't necessarily sell software. They sell hardware products and the software ties it all together. Nvidia has dominated GPUs for more than 25 years and datacenter for more than 10 years.
The Touchscreen Vs. The Keyboard was the ultimate deciding factor that killed Blackberry. Then the Samsung Galaxy S that showed the Iphone what a touch-screen really should look like. The rest was history.
Who knows that Jensen Huang said numerous times in his Taiwan visit that Taiwan is a country, and there’s no blowback, as we saw with John Cena and Lebron? Jensen is one in a billlion
I think you are reading too much into the Amazon-Nvidia story. It's a partnership that serves both parties. You cannot just "bully" Amazon into a partnership, it's just not their style.
Costco has a forward P/E of 48 NVDA has a forward P/E of 35 AAPL Fwd P/E 28 AMZN Fwd P/E 31 Which one is factually overvalued? Joseph so biased against Nvidia he misses the forest for the trees.
tragedy 😢🤣😂🤣 Get real and get the job then let’s talk what is a real struggle. Most of the so called influencers is creating weak (auto generated) content why would they deserve more $$$!?
I like the idea to change malls from purely shopping centers, when so much can be bought online now, to social and activity centers. Put in a gym, a walking/running track, some pickleball courts, bowling alleys, yoga studio, a spa/salon, virtual reality experiences, gaming centers, restaurants, coffee shops, bars, comedy clubs, theaters for live shows, courtyards with fountains, dog park/daycare/boarding/training, with shops for things that people like to see/feel/touch like cosmetics. That would revive malls as gathering places.
Anyone care to explain to me how companies like Intel aren’t able to replicate what Nvidia does? As far as I understand GPU’s it’s basically a multicore chip that executes a piece of code in parallel over a block of memory. So why can’t Intel (or any other chip manufacturer) design a core and copy-paste it x number of times? They’re already capable of creating multicore CPU’s, so where exactly does the additional complexity come into play? A GPU-core should in theory be slightly simpler to design than a CPU-core as it doesn’t have to deal with I/O stuff, it’s mainly mathematical, which Intel already knows how to do. I don’t get it.
Nvidia invented the GPU. They have had a lot of time to perfect the silicon architecture for parallel compute in a way none of us will know about because they're company secrets, but a part of making that architecture really dense is using EUV lithography that Intel only just started doing. One big aspect is that Nvidia is Fabless, so that meant that they didn't have the CAPEX than Intel and could go to the best manufacturer. TMSC has a lot of CAPEX but they can focus on getting the EUV machines from ASML. They did just get a $350M EUV machine though. Intel was a monopolist that got lazy sitting on consistent profits, AMD hit their CPU game and Nvidia and AMD have sidelined them with parallel compute. They're in catch up mode with infrastructure, parallel compute, and general architecture research.
They can & they likely will. The question is when. Nvidia has a head start, & catching up in the semiconductor industry takes years. Nvidia is also offering a suite of products: chips, software, services, maintenance, etc. And pairing their chips with software is analogous to Apple's "ecosystem". Once users are locked in, it's very difficult for competitors to dethrone them. And while Intel is playing catchup, Nvidia continues to innovate. Ironically, this is similar to the 1990s when AMD was perpetually behind Intel.
UBS analysts expect Nvidias Software revenue can reach 10-20b in the future. They have a big opportunity to offer pre made models and charge high tickets. They charge ca. 5k $ per User per year. Similar to cloud the demand could come from almost all industries
Brah look at the leadership Jensen is once in a lifetime CEO. I trust a smart man in leather jacket who signs on women's bre*sts 😅😂. By the time other companies will catch up to Nvidia, they ll already move to something futuristic.
I wouldn’t bet on NVDA catching MSFT or AMZN. There have been plenty of purpose-built clouds over the years. If this is the justification for NVDA’s growth, I would be concerned. The breadth of AWS nearly addresses every single need of an enterprise. DGX will need massive investment to compete in any meaningful way. Sounds to me like DGX is the new FSD.
The only difference is that FSD has no opponents, and its opponents will never be able to catch up. But dgx is trying to grab the share that already exists in the market.
NVIDIA always had the software to backup the hardware, that is why AMD is no where near NVIDIA in datacenter space, because there support and software is very critical. so it is not really a transition but doubling down. NVIDIA's Acquistion of Mellanox is probably the best deal in history, bought for 7 billion, generated 11-12 billion already last year? NVIDIA has a complete product hardware + software , GPU+CPU+networking equipment and the software to go along with it. on the other hand how much did Xilinx cost AMD? and how much revenue does it generate?
Bro, we ain't supposed to get rich from playing video games. I think we have gone too far when influences are getting rich from just playing video games, it is like a shortcut to success is not fair for those who worked up building a company or a career. I think it is fair that they are not rich. This is the kind of thing for side income, we should continue working regularly and using the gaming as a side income, that's a fair reality. I don't know why anyone would be upset about gamers not getting rich.
I’m glad you made a video this was interesting. Like I said Joseph this company is one I think you could understand if you wanted to, and maybe broaden your view on them.
Your videos are super informative. I like the idea of Netflix; I can definitely see it as a good business move to pump up their market presence. I appreciate that they are thinking outside the software realm.
This guy is just salty on NVDA bc he missed the boat not knowing how to evaluate the stock...NVDA does not have a solid monopoly, it has competition, they're just behind.
NVDA is going to have double contraction - from their concentration in Datacenter and in their clients. Their only segment having the boom is datacenter and there their sales are concentrated on few big customers. Datacenter spending is going to be subject to cycle ... and that is known to all IT guys. As about NVDA margins, the competition is coming for them - is going to be the same situation as was with INTEL VS AMD. For maybe 2 decades Intel had the best of the best CPUs, yet, that didn't stop AMD. They had lower performance but better pricing and guess what, is the customer that will make the ultimate decision. And for a lot of customers cheaper will be de decisive factor.
Why I prefer NVIDIA is that they are better placed to maintain long term growth potential, and provide a platform for other AI companies. I know someone who has made more than 200% from NVIDIA.
Over the years, I've been a part of numerous trading programs, sifting through a barrage of information. Yet, nothing has come close to the sheer clarity, depth, and precision of Sandy insights. It's akin to finding a diamond in a coal mine.
custom racks don’t matter, lots of companies do this - for example storage appliances almost always have custom racks. it doesn’t matter, in fact it makes installation in the datacenter easier.
Why I prefer NVIDIA is that they are better placed to maintain long term growth potential, and provide a platform for other AI companies. I know someone who has made more than 200% from NVIDIA. I'll also take these other recommendations you made.
"Information" is famous for fear mongering, hit pieces, and questionable articles targeting tech CEOs and companies. I wouldn't look deep into that article. I'm pretty sure Amazon gets its fair share from DGX cloud customers, otherwise they wouldn't do it. There is nothing wrong with Nvidia setting up requirements for the racks. It's just a hardware hosting contract, Nvidia knows what is needed for the type of service they want to provide, generic amazon servers/networking may be not sufficient. Nvidia obviously is paying for all of that, nothing is for free. The more custom specific requirements you have the more you pay. I'm 100% sure Amazon gets a nice cut from nvidia's customers.
You can keep a certain amount, but YES. Stocks are portions of businesses that should be growing their profits, on an inflation-adjusted basis productive assets should grow more than a piece of metal that just sits there. Gold holds its value stocks grow their value... Stocks can also go to zero but if you choose the s&P 500 you'll be good!
@@m1iles I made that mistake when I was a teen, sold my Google and bought silver... A few years later I bought my Google back again and sold the silver. In all honesty I probably lost quite a bit of money by not holding GOOG in those years. You live and learn! Happy investing 😜 P.S. if you're new and looking for a diversified ETF I would say go with Sp500 instead of World. I'm biased, but so is the economy, that's why I say US bias is just better for gains but it will have more volatility.
Not to be rude but next time before talking about a company, be sure you have all the informations. NVIDIA has been a software company for a couple of years now too. They have a lot of softwares that only work on their hardware, they're also investing a lot into partnerships so their partners softwares could work better on their products, that's how their marketshare became so huge in the GPU space. Jensen has been a madman with money and has an history of acting like a total asshole with his partners. So I'm not really surprised by this news hahaha, Jensen is insane
Yeah, they released CUDA in 2007... Literally software that turns a GPU into a general purpose accelerator. But you're right Omniverse has been out for a few years now and is incredible with many corporate consumers that get lots of value from using Nvidia software.
Is Nvidia generating a lot of revenue from software now? No, but they have CUDA, and they're offering services such as Omniverse that have great potential. AI will also play more of a role in generating software in the future. Hyperscalers are making chips, and Nvidia is getting into cloud. Fair is fair, no? Nvidia could easily build out their own data centers considering that they design the whole platform, and they could do so at their own cost not what they sell it for. Most customers want to use CUDA and Nvidia products. So, they bring a lot to the table. Nvidia is not just getting revenue from big companies either. Governments are beginning to buy, too. Telling companies to build out more space to house the GPUs may be to ensure that they go into use right away so that other customers aren't waiting while those GPUs sit around. Jensen comes across as a soft spoken, humble and funny guy, but I agree, Nvidia is an aggressive company, which explains why AMD has gotten nowhere trying to compete with them over the years. That is a good thing. Other tech companies are aggressive, too. You need to be to succeed in the business. Cisco is an overused and bad argument. Different products and Cisco increased through multiple expansion while Nvidia has been based on earnings.
6,000 Patreon subscribers x $10/month = $60,000/month = $720,000/year. $720,000. Per. Year. You're insightful with stocks Joseph, but please don't punch down on anybody trying to earn an honest living, especially when you're bringing in over half a million a year.
Too proud to admit he failed to see what's Nvidia about. Ego is deadly when investing, when you're wrong you're compelled to double down and start downplaying or deriding the company. Just like Cathie Wood, she sold NVDA before the run-up, and now she's constantly making up excuses why NVDA will lose against competitors.
Imagine nvidia making their own cloud business then cutting chip supply to all customers and only using it for themselves. Ideal scenerio for nvidia investors.
Joseph speaking of hardware companies that plan to transition more into services and software, could you do a video were you analyze the Broadcom aquisition of VMWare and the transition of VMWare to subscription model
Hardware companies telling software companies on how to install their hardware while simultaneously making sure it fits exclusively their IP is nothing new Joseph.. I would argue that’s the standard on any heavy industry. Not allowing for competition is how you stay in the game. Example: semiconductor hardware monopolies
This is somewhat of a gross over generalization. Texas Instruments is a hardware company. Their chart is up and to the right. Chip designers are largely hardware companies. Cyclicality doesn’t mean they don’t go up and to the right. It’s more nuanced than you’re making it out to be.
NVDA is not a hardware company. They license IP to manufacturers such as TSMC and they sell software and related services. Maybe read the 10K before making a video on a company.
I find myself agreeing with a lot of your takes Joseph, but with this point I disagree: 10:47 Sustained demand is not inherently a property of software products. I know this is not exactly what you said, but you are framing it in that way. The advantage you are describing comes from the subscription model, or ongoing service fees, not necessarily software itself. The flattening of the cyclical nature of product demand rather, is a result of switching cost. This is achieved either simply by inertia, via the friction and time investment for customers to learn a competing tool (or buying new hardware) or via "walled gardens" or similar ecosystem scaling advantages. Especially in B2B (I'm thinking Industry, production machinery, production plants and similar facilities) maintenance can be a huge part of revenue and this is also ongoing/reoccurring revenue. Also, because of hardware costs switching cost is often also inherently high. Software, in contrast to hardware, has the advantage that marginal cost only slightly increases with the quantity of products sold. This is the only leg up for software compared to hardware. What I find strange in the software industry today, is the trend to increasingly include cloud services, or compute services in products where these might not be the core product. The main result is, that marginal cost increases in software products, diminishing the advantage of software products compared to hardware products. This does not change the merits of companies like Apple, Microsoft and so on. However, I’d like to caution, to attribute the “low cyclicality, always growing”-advantage to software, even software subscription services as a hole. I’d attribute this advantage to a combination of the subscription/service fee model, combined with a moat or high switching cost and low marginal costs. Incidentally these are also attributes of most Apple- and Microsoft products.
I know Joe is joking, but it is hard to make money in the gaming space. It's super saturated. Even Joe knows this, as far as UA-cam is concerned finance is one of the most lucrative spaces as far as quality vs quantity (aka you don't need to make a video every day as opposed to gaming). Now, to be fair, the easiest way to make money is a 9 to 5. But we are in the age of workers looking for meaning vs just a paycheck. Oh! And the question of "how much money is enough" wasn't really answered.
I don't think nvidia is forcing the other big tech companies, they are trying to prevent buying and hoarding that's why they require they prove they have the data centers to occupy and use the chips.
From snippets and articles of interviews with Huang, I don't see Huang as the bullying type. He's more of a I'll be your friend and you scratch my back type😂😂
I've known about the Netflix Houses for months now from an article in a real estate journal talking about it while doing research on malls for my masters degree. I didn't think much of it and I am surprised people are hyping it up so much. It just seemed meh to me
I'm really confused about this idea of "transition"... As if Nvidia hasn't done software for decades. They have CUDA (which allows general processing on GPUs) and Omniverse, and now have AI robotics and AI assistant NIMS. If you haven't seen their Omniverse Digital Twin programs you should. MASSIVE VALUE ADD...... and this is not new. CUDA was released in 2007 and Omniverse was released in 2021.
If you haven't tried the patreon, you're missing out: www.patreon.com/josephcarlson
Patreon includes:
Full access to Qualtrim.com
Over 100 exclusive videos, and new ones every week.
Access to a fun community where we chat together every day.
It's zero risk, comes with a free trial and cancel any time.
Join over 6,000 Patreon members and try it out!
Fourth‼️ 🥉🥉
Can you make a bank stock video! With the biggest banks.
Some AI Stocks are pretty unstable at the moment, but if you do the right math, you should be just fine. Bloomberg and other finance media have been recording cases of folks gaining over 250k just in a matter of weeks/couple months, so I think there are a lot of wealth transfer in this downtime if you know where to look.
you’re right! The current market might give opportunities to maximize profit within a short term, but in order to execute such strategy , you must be a skilled practitioner
It's often true that people underestimate the importance of financial advisors until they feel the negative effects of emotional decision-making. I remember a few summers ago, after a tough divorce, when I needed a boost for my struggling business. I researched and found a licensed advisor who diligently helped grow my reserves despite inflation. Consequently, my reserves increased from $275k to around $750k.
Mind if I ask you recommend this particular professional you use their service? i have quite a lot of marketing problems
There are a handful of experts in the field. I've experimented with a few over the past years, but I've stuck with ‘’ Melissa Terri Swayne” for about five years now, and her performance has been consistently impressive. She’s quite known in her field, look-her up.
she actually appears to be well-read and educated. I just did a Google search for her name and found her webpage, I appreciate you sharing
The main focus for markets now is Nvidia, which has powered a large chunk of the S&P 500’s recent earnings. Nvidia’s stock, up more than 90% this year, rose 2.5% in New York on Monday, sending the Nasdaq 100 index to another record high. I'm still looking for companies to make additions to my $350K portfolio, to boost performance. Here for ideas...
I think the safest strategy is to diversify investments. Like spreading investments across different asset classes, like bonds, real estate, and international stocks, they can reduce the impact of a market meltdown
A lot of folks downplay the role of advlsors until being burnt by their own emotions. I remember couple summers back, after my lengthy divorce, I needed a good boost to help my business stay afloat, hence I researched for licensed advisors and came across someone of utmost qualifications. She's helped grow my reserve notwithstanding inflation, from $275k to $850K
This is definitely considerable! think you could suggest any professional/advisors i can get on the phone with? i'm in dire need of proper portfolio allocation
Just research the name Annette Christine Conte . You’d find necessary details to work with a correspondence to set up an appointment.
She appears to be well-educated and well-read. I ran an online search on her name and came across her website; thank you for sharing.
Strong BUY. Still early innings. NVIDIA is the dominant leader in AI and the preferred technology partner globally. Even w new competition on the horizon, NVIDIA is far ahead of the competition. 85% market share. 76% margin. Unrivaled demand for new Blackwell chip. Demand far exceeds production for Blackwell through to 2025 and beyond. No competitor has anything close to Blackwell. And forward P/E is about 33 (cheap for a high growth stock). Buy this stock and wait. You will be rewarded.
This is Interesting because i bought NVIDIA around September last year. The company is selling shovels in a gold rush. It accounted for almost 80% of my market return last year, and I'm sure this year will present other interesting stocks.
When it comes to investment, diversification is key. That is why I have my interests set on key sectors based on performance and projected growth. They range from the EV sector, renewable energy, Tech and Health (AMD) alongside coins, and gold. I'm also working on an investment plan that includes AI looking into Nvidia, MSFT, Alphabet stocks among others with my Fin. Advisor, . It's been a year and half of steady growth.
@@joshbarney114 I appreciate the implementation of ideas and strategies that result to unmeasurable progress. Being heavily liquid, I'd rather not reinvent the wheel, thus the search for a reputable advisor, mind sharing info of this person guiding you please?
Finding financial advisors like Marisa Breton Dollard who can assist you shape your portfolio would be a very creative option. There will be difficult times ahead, and prudent personal money management will be essential to navigating them.
Excellent share, just inputted Marisa Breton Dollard on the internet, spotted her consulting page ranked top and was able to schedule a call session. Ive seen commentaries about advisors but not one looks this phenomenal.
Obviously AI stocks will dominate 2024. Why I prefer NVIDIA is that they are better placed to maintain long term growth potential, and provide a platform for other AI companies. I know someone who has made more than 200% from NVIDIA. I'll also take these other recommendations you made.
To minimise risks and maximise growth, I think investors should begin with S&P 500/ETFs for a strong foundation, diversify across asset classes, and continue with disciplined, frequent investing.
No doubt, having the right plan is invaluable, my portfolio is well-matched for every season of the market and recently hit 100% rise from early last year. I and my CFP are working on a 7 figure ballpark goal, tho this could take till Q3 2024.
Can you share details of your advisor? I want to invest my increased cash flow in stocks and alternative assets to achieve financial goals.
Annette Christine Conte is her name. You may look her up online; she is a reputable financial counselor in the US with a license.
Thank you very much. Seeing her page allowed me to leave her a message.
I think the hope is only for unimantic this year, other projects will not show themselves like it.
AI stocks will dominate 2024. Why I prefer NVIDIA is that they are better placed to maintain long term growth potential, and provide a platform for other AI companies. I know someone who has made more than 200% from NVIDIA. I'll also take these other recommendations you made.
...Let's face it... buying more st0cks & index funds during stock market c0rrections and bear markets is scary. Which makes it really hard to do for most people like me. I have 260k i want to transfer into an s&p but its hard to bite the bullet and d0 it.
...I agree with you. I started out with investing on my own, but I lost a lot of money. I was able to pull out about $200k after the 2020 crash. I invested the money using an analyst, and in seven months, I raked in almost $673,000
Smart, If i wanted to do the same with my retirement funds too, how do i get started trading?
I've had majority of my holdings in ETFs, tech stocks and I've had 45% increase in my portfolio, especially with Nvidia P/E (price to earnings ratio) adding few others, personally, MICHELE KATHERINE SINGH take good care of my holdings.
This recommendation is coming at the right time because i am literally grasping for straws atm! I verified her online and scheduled a phone call with her.
I agree that many people are considering NVDA as the "Stock of the year." However, I'm curious about which stocks could potentially become the next META in terms of growth over the next decade. I've allocated $200k for investment, aiming to retire comfortably.
AI is already showing tremendous potential. To achieve long-term success, like META, it's crucial to avoid impulsive decisions based on short-term market fluctuations. Prioritize patience nd a long-term perspective, nd consider consulting a fin advsr for informed investment decisions.
Facing a similar situation, I sought advice from an invęstment advisęr. Through portfolio restructuring and diversification with good ETFs, S&P 500 and growth stocks, I've turned my portfolio around from $200k to over $800k in a few years.
Your invt-adviser must be really good, I hope it's okay to inquire if you're still collaborating with the same invt-adviser and how I can get in touch with them?
Jennifer Alaine is the licensed fiduciary I use. Just research the name. You’d find necessary details to work with a correspondence to set up an appointment.
Thank you! I entered her full name into my browser, and her website came out on top. I filled her form and scheduled a call . i hope she gets back to me soon.
Important to note ciscos PE which was 500 during the bubble, Nividias pe is nowhere near that high
I'm still shorting NVDA. Thank me later 🙂
@@pazuzuxxinteresting, at what price?
77 PE is still shit
@@pazuzuxxshort term no doubt.
@@Ryan-pp4bx Wouldn't touch Nvidia bc i'm not close to their fundamentals but growing business by three digits YOY and having damn near 80% GM is very impressive. I'm surprised their PE isn't over 100.
I think you are misreading the Amazon NVIDIA partnership. NVIDIA is not building and operating their own data centers, they are basically just offering a more managed service on top of AWS, meaning AWS still gets paid to rent the space. If AWS gets their chips to a level that it can compete with NVIDIA, then what’s to stop them from pushing them out of their data centers? Also, you are forgetting that NVIDIA needs AWS because they are the largest CSP and have all the data. GPUs are worthless if you don’t have the training datasets, all of which AWS has.
" If AWS gets their chips to a level that it can compete with NVIDIA"...you defintely going full hard delusional. AWS has tough competition, you act like Amazon is the only hyperscaler in town that can build and operate their own data centers....Google, MSFT, Oracle. Building and operating a data center without Nvidia chips, Amazon data centers are useless against the competition. Also, anybody can build a datacenter if they have the money, It's mostly comprised of 3rd party suppliers/vendors and. Alot of companies outsource datacenter build outs to Oracle. But nobody can create a chip like Nvidia.
There is no bigger bully than Amazon, not only to private sellers but to their own employees.
Yeah, yeah…
@@epbrown01 Which part isn't true?
@@George-f8h The bullying of employees. I worked in a warehouse for years and the issue is the opposite. I once had a supervisor I didn’t meet until his last day, and it wasn’t unusual for me to not see them for weeks.
The beautiful thing about Nvidia is that they're growing like this with only 29,600 employees that are doing quite well financially. Nvidia doesn't over hire just to turn around and fire a lot of people.
“Consider getting a job” shit had me laughing 😂😂😂
Jensen Huang is just the best ceo
A wolf in sheep clothing
@@hotfeva9843 He wears leather, not wool.
@@hotfeva9843 What
His company got big on the back of gamers, those he completely ignores now.
ahhhh, not the best but, he's up there with the likes of Alex Karp and Elon Musk.
The intro to the "Social Media Influencers Aren't Getting Rich" section was hillarious :)
Additional earnings reports from major tech companies, driven by Nvidia, coupled with trader FOMO, could fuel a resurgence in market buying pressure. I'm considering investing over $300k, but I'm uncertain about risk mitigation strategies.
Nvidia stock is roaring like many did during the 1990s bubble. But this time around, the hype around new chips is happening in a more mature demand environment.
Agreed, After taking charge of my portfolio in early 2017, i stumbled into losses. Upon realizing that a change was necessary, I consulted a fiduciary advisor in 2020 and since then my $1.2m portfolio has gained 28% annually through restructuring and diversification using dividend equities, ETFs, mutual funds, and REITs.
Great gains there! mind sharing details of your advisor pleas? i've started gaining more cash flow with my employment and looking at putting money into stocks and alternative assets that can help build wealth over time
Carol Vivian Constable is the licensed advisor I use. Just research the name. You’d find necessary details to work with to set up an appointment
I looked up her name online and found her page. I emailed and made an appointment to talk with her. Thanks for the tip
Very informative, thank you
and insightful
Blackberry is another good example of hardware company failed in transitioning to a software company.
what are you talking about? you needed a special plan to have blackberry service. they also sold software so that companies could run their own blackberry servers which had per device fees.
they had “as a service” income before it was a thing.
blackberry messenger with group chats existed before whatsapp, imessage and facebook messenger where a thing.
they had superb software but they missed the train when the iphone came out and didn’t come up with devices which people wanted.
blackberry failed because they were blindsided by the iPhone.
Nvidia already has a huge software moat, they don't need to necessarily transition to "sell" software. It's like how Apple doesn't necessarily sell software. They sell hardware products and the software ties it all together. Nvidia has dominated GPUs for more than 25 years and datacenter for more than 10 years.
The Touchscreen Vs. The Keyboard was the ultimate deciding factor that killed Blackberry. Then the Samsung Galaxy S that showed the Iphone what a touch-screen really should look like. The rest was history.
Nvidia has CUDA, Omniverse, NIMS, and Robotics software.... Nvidia is the Apple of the next couple decades.
Jensen Huang is a straight gangster 😎… and he rocks leather jackets better than Elon ever could!
Who knows that Jensen Huang said numerous times in his Taiwan visit that Taiwan is a country, and there’s no blowback, as we saw with John Cena and Lebron? Jensen is one in a billlion
I think you are reading too much into the Amazon-Nvidia story. It's a partnership that serves both parties. You cannot just "bully" Amazon into a partnership, it's just not their style.
Amazon always has the uphand with its "partners".
So it is correct to say Nvidia is bullying them.
Eh it’s more like a brother bullying there fat brother if the fat brother is smart he will take it as motivation to be better
Intel's datacenters market share got eaten up not by AMD but by nvidia
Excellent insights backed up with data.
so netflix loosing marketshare on absolute tv and streaming views. i guess we wont see a videocast on that one :p
Great content. Thank you.
bruh when insinuated jensen in his leather jacket looks like a high school bully.
But Amazon is also a bully
Costco has a forward P/E of 48
NVDA has a forward P/E of 35
AAPL Fwd P/E 28
AMZN Fwd P/E 31
Which one is factually overvalued?
Joseph so biased against Nvidia he misses the forest for the trees.
Ugh, ikr! He really doesn't understand Nvidia. Oh well 🤷
Oh no those poor influencers. Let’s do a go fund me
🤣😂
yeah, we are so concerned....😂😂
tragedy 😢🤣😂🤣 Get real and get the job then let’s talk what is a real struggle. Most of the so called influencers is creating weak (auto generated) content why would they deserve more $$$!?
I like the idea to change malls from purely shopping centers, when so much can be bought online now, to social and activity centers. Put in a gym, a walking/running track, some pickleball courts, bowling alleys, yoga studio, a spa/salon, virtual reality experiences, gaming centers, restaurants, coffee shops, bars, comedy clubs, theaters for live shows, courtyards with fountains, dog park/daycare/boarding/training, with shops for things that people like to see/feel/touch like cosmetics. That would revive malls as gathering places.
Anyone care to explain to me how companies like Intel aren’t able to replicate what Nvidia does?
As far as I understand GPU’s it’s basically a multicore chip that executes a piece of code in parallel over a block of memory.
So why can’t Intel (or any other chip manufacturer) design a core and copy-paste it x number of times?
They’re already capable of creating multicore CPU’s, so where exactly does the additional complexity come into play?
A GPU-core should in theory be slightly simpler to design than a CPU-core as it doesn’t have to deal with I/O stuff, it’s mainly mathematical, which Intel already knows how to do.
I don’t get it.
Nvidia invented the GPU. They have had a lot of time to perfect the silicon architecture for parallel compute in a way none of us will know about because they're company secrets, but a part of making that architecture really dense is using EUV lithography that Intel only just started doing. One big aspect is that Nvidia is Fabless, so that meant that they didn't have the CAPEX than Intel and could go to the best manufacturer. TMSC has a lot of CAPEX but they can focus on getting the EUV machines from ASML. They did just get a $350M EUV machine though. Intel was a monopolist that got lazy sitting on consistent profits, AMD hit their CPU game and Nvidia and AMD have sidelined them with parallel compute. They're in catch up mode with infrastructure, parallel compute, and general architecture research.
They can & they likely will. The question is when.
Nvidia has a head start, & catching up in the semiconductor industry takes years. Nvidia is also offering a suite of products: chips, software, services, maintenance, etc. And pairing their chips with software is analogous to Apple's "ecosystem". Once users are locked in, it's very difficult for competitors to dethrone them.
And while Intel is playing catchup, Nvidia continues to innovate. Ironically, this is similar to the 1990s when AMD was perpetually behind Intel.
UBS analysts expect Nvidias Software revenue can reach 10-20b in the future. They have a big opportunity to offer pre made models and charge high tickets. They charge ca. 5k $ per User per year. Similar to cloud the demand could come from almost all industries
🎯
Nice pokerface on the socialmedia. "Regular jobs are fine too". LMAO. Thanks for this intermezzo in your high-quality content. Fan of the channel!
hehe!!! Nicely done, Joseph... that's some top level funny sarcasm right there. :)
Long time listener… this is one of the better episodes you’ve put out. The Nvidia segment was on point
Brah look at the leadership Jensen is once in a lifetime CEO. I trust a smart man in leather jacket who signs on women's bre*sts 😅😂. By the time other companies will catch up to Nvidia, they ll already move to something futuristic.
I wonder if that would work for me, get a leather jacket, and start signing bra’s, it’s worth a shot!
I wouldn’t bet on NVDA catching MSFT or AMZN. There have been plenty of purpose-built clouds over the years. If this is the justification for NVDA’s growth, I would be concerned. The breadth of AWS nearly addresses every single need of an enterprise. DGX will need massive investment to compete in any meaningful way. Sounds to me like DGX is the new FSD.
Amazon plus running open source models is great. Open source models will get better by the day and hopefully run on lighter hardware.
The only difference is that FSD has no opponents, and its opponents will never be able to catch up.
But dgx is trying to grab the share that already exists in the market.
Netflix doing a pop up like those Halloween stores
Huge content always. Youre definitely my favorite content creator man, keep it up! I loved the little jabs at content creation, it was funny
NVIDIA always had the software to backup the hardware, that is why AMD is no where near NVIDIA in datacenter space, because there support and software is very critical.
so it is not really a transition but doubling down.
NVIDIA's Acquistion of Mellanox is probably the best deal in history, bought for 7 billion, generated 11-12 billion already last year?
NVIDIA has a complete product hardware + software , GPU+CPU+networking equipment and the software to go along with it.
on the other hand how much did Xilinx cost AMD? and how much revenue does it generate?
Bro, we ain't supposed to get rich from playing video games. I think we have gone too far when influences are getting rich from just playing video games, it is like a shortcut to success is not fair for those who worked up building a company or a career. I think it is fair that they are not rich. This is the kind of thing for side income, we should continue working regularly and using the gaming as a side income, that's a fair reality. I don't know why anyone would be upset about gamers not getting rich.
I don't see demand stopping. Is Tesla going to stop training self-driving? Is open AI going to stop chat GTP 5? Or GTP6?
I learnt a lot in this one... nice episode joesph
Netflix House feels like Planet Hollywood 🤷♂️
Comic con convention spot on! As you were describing it, 8 was picturing comic con
Jensen: no soup for you amzn
Arguably no better quality than here 🙏 wow great job
When can UA-cam act on these bots? 🙄
"we need a union for influencer".. damn, HAHAHAA
I’m glad you made a video this was interesting. Like I said Joseph this company is one I think you could understand if you wanted to, and maybe broaden your view on them.
Really find your storytelling amazing
Your videos are super informative. I like the idea of Netflix; I can definitely see it as a good business move to pump up their market presence. I appreciate that they are thinking outside the software realm.
This guy is just salty on NVDA bc he missed the boat not knowing how to evaluate the stock...NVDA does not have a solid monopoly, it has competition, they're just behind.
NVDA is going to have double contraction - from their concentration in Datacenter and in their clients. Their only segment having the boom is datacenter and there their sales are concentrated on few big customers. Datacenter spending is going to be subject to cycle ... and that is known to all IT guys. As about NVDA margins, the competition is coming for them - is going to be the same situation as was with INTEL VS AMD. For maybe 2 decades Intel had the best of the best CPUs, yet, that didn't stop AMD. They had lower performance but better pricing and guess what, is the customer that will make the ultimate decision. And for a lot of customers cheaper will be de decisive factor.
nah you doing these streamers dirty with this commentary lol (but its deserved)
GREAT INFO AND GOOD COMPARISON TO THE BIG COMPANIES OF THE 90s
Not even close
Yea buddy! Party On friends! 🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳✌️✌️✌️✌️
MWC!! Semiconductors FTW!
@@WanderingExistence You know it! 🥳🥳🥳🥳✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️
Why I prefer NVIDIA is that they are better placed to maintain long term growth potential, and provide a platform for other AI companies. I know someone who has made more than 200% from NVIDIA.
Over the years, I've been a part of numerous trading programs, sifting through a barrage of information. Yet, nothing has come close to the sheer clarity, depth, and precision of Sandy insights. It's akin to finding a diamond in a coal mine.
custom racks don’t matter, lots of companies do this - for example storage appliances almost always have custom racks.
it doesn’t matter, in fact it makes installation in the datacenter easier.
Ma guy already on the 3rd thumbnail, chill man😂
It’s a/b testing from UA-cam. You make 3 thumbnails and then pick the best performing one.
@@JosephCarlsonAfterHours now this is something I had no clue about, cool stuff! Keep at it 💯💯💯
Any ideas on which AI partner(s) Apple may have to use in China? Anything worth pursuing or not worth the bother? Thx for thoughtful posts.
Thanks for an education video.
Why I prefer NVIDIA is that they are better placed to maintain long term growth potential, and provide a platform for other AI companies. I know someone who has made more than 200% from NVIDIA. I'll also take these other recommendations you made.
Up 400+% on NVDA in my taxable!
Jensen is better than Jobs. He is my rockstar! What a style and super smart.
To be honest, I'm not really looking forward to visiting the OZ ride at HBO-land
"Information" is famous for fear mongering, hit pieces, and questionable articles targeting tech CEOs and companies. I wouldn't look deep into that article. I'm pretty sure Amazon gets its fair share from DGX cloud customers, otherwise they wouldn't do it. There is nothing wrong with Nvidia setting up requirements for the racks. It's just a hardware hosting contract, Nvidia knows what is needed for the type of service they want to provide, generic amazon servers/networking may be not sufficient. Nvidia obviously is paying for all of that, nothing is for free. The more custom specific requirements you have the more you pay. I'm 100% sure Amazon gets a nice cut from nvidia's customers.
Stop hating bro just buy and double triple yo money with Nvidia
I love the subtle sarcasm.
how much r u brining in?
I'm sure glad to hear about nividia! I took a hit on the shares today! I guess I'm buying more?
Love you man stay grounded
You should see how Nvidia treats its Board partners for GPUS. Nothing that Nvidia hasn’t done before to strong arm them into making Nvidia profits.
Should i sell my physical gold and put it in an sp500 or msci world etf?
You can keep a certain amount, but YES. Stocks are portions of businesses that should be growing their profits, on an inflation-adjusted basis productive assets should grow more than a piece of metal that just sits there. Gold holds its value stocks grow their value... Stocks can also go to zero but if you choose the s&P 500 you'll be good!
@@WanderingExistence thanks was thinking the same as you described with keeping its value rather than growing the value
@@m1iles I made that mistake when I was a teen, sold my Google and bought silver... A few years later I bought my Google back again and sold the silver. In all honesty I probably lost quite a bit of money by not holding GOOG in those years. You live and learn! Happy investing 😜
P.S. if you're new and looking for a diversified ETF I would say go with Sp500 instead of World. I'm biased, but so is the economy, that's why I say US bias is just better for gains but it will have more volatility.
This is excellent! Wow. A must see video if you invest!
Not to be rude but next time before talking about a company, be sure you have all the informations. NVIDIA has been a software company for a couple of years now too.
They have a lot of softwares that only work on their hardware, they're also investing a lot into partnerships so their partners softwares could work better on their products, that's how their marketshare became so huge in the GPU space.
Jensen has been a madman with money and has an history of acting like a total asshole with his partners. So I'm not really surprised by this news hahaha, Jensen is insane
Yeah, they released CUDA in 2007... Literally software that turns a GPU into a general purpose accelerator. But you're right Omniverse has been out for a few years now and is incredible with many corporate consumers that get lots of value from using Nvidia software.
Thanks man
Is Nvidia generating a lot of revenue from software now? No, but they have CUDA, and they're offering services such as Omniverse that have great potential. AI will also play more of a role in generating software in the future. Hyperscalers are making chips, and Nvidia is getting into cloud. Fair is fair, no? Nvidia could easily build out their own data centers considering that they design the whole platform, and they could do so at their own cost not what they sell it for. Most customers want to use CUDA and Nvidia products. So, they bring a lot to the table. Nvidia is not just getting revenue from big companies either. Governments are beginning to buy, too. Telling companies to build out more space to house the GPUs may be to ensure that they go into use right away so that other customers aren't waiting while those GPUs sit around. Jensen comes across as a soft spoken, humble and funny guy, but I agree, Nvidia is an aggressive company, which explains why AMD has gotten nowhere trying to compete with them over the years. That is a good thing. Other tech companies are aggressive, too. You need to be to succeed in the business. Cisco is an overused and bad argument. Different products and Cisco increased through multiple expansion while Nvidia has been based on earnings.
6,000 Patreon subscribers x $10/month = $60,000/month = $720,000/year.
$720,000. Per. Year.
You're insightful with stocks Joseph, but please don't punch down on anybody trying to earn an honest living, especially when you're bringing in over half a million a year.
It’s a joke my man.
Content creation is a hobby should not replace a fulltime job..good for some extra cash.
Love the tongue and cheek take on "influencers". 😂
Joe, I enjoyed watching this portion on NVDA/AMZN. Thank you for the coverage. I sense you feel derision towards NVDA. Why?
He thinks its unpredictable
Too proud to admit he failed to see what's Nvidia about.
Ego is deadly when investing, when you're wrong you're compelled to double down and start downplaying or deriding the company. Just like Cathie Wood, she sold NVDA before the run-up, and now she's constantly making up excuses why NVDA will lose against competitors.
LOL ... love the sarcasm
Imagine nvidia making their own cloud business then cutting chip supply to all customers and only using it for themselves. Ideal scenerio for nvidia investors.
Thanks for the Video.
Are WSC, HALO, and ADMA on your list? If so, I would like to become a Patron member immediately.
Joseph speaking of hardware companies that plan to transition more into services and software, could you do a video were you analyze the Broadcom aquisition of VMWare and the transition of VMWare to subscription model
Jesus Joseph. Just open a position on nvidia already
Hardware companies telling software companies on how to install their hardware while simultaneously making sure it fits exclusively their IP is nothing new Joseph.. I would argue that’s the standard on any heavy industry. Not allowing for competition is how you stay in the game. Example: semiconductor hardware monopolies
For reference, only 6% at the US population makes over 100 K so these influencers have over double the success rate
simple: lockdown the speed of the hardware to 75% and charge a monthly fee to unlock the full 100%
Endless lawsuits and lost trust can be fatal to a company
This is somewhat of a gross over generalization. Texas Instruments is a hardware company. Their chart is up and to the right. Chip designers are largely hardware companies. Cyclicality doesn’t mean they don’t go up and to the right. It’s more nuanced than you’re making it out to be.
NVDA is not a hardware company. They license IP to manufacturers such as TSMC and they sell software and related services. Maybe read the 10K before making a video on a company.
I find myself agreeing with a lot of your takes Joseph, but with this point I disagree: 10:47
Sustained demand is not inherently a property of software products.
I know this is not exactly what you said, but you are framing it in that way. The advantage you are describing comes from the subscription model, or ongoing service fees, not necessarily software itself. The flattening of the cyclical nature of product demand rather, is a result of switching cost. This is achieved either simply by inertia, via the friction and time investment for customers to learn a competing tool (or buying new hardware) or via "walled gardens" or similar ecosystem scaling advantages. Especially in B2B (I'm thinking Industry, production machinery, production plants and similar facilities) maintenance can be a huge part of revenue and this is also ongoing/reoccurring revenue. Also, because of hardware costs switching cost is often also inherently high.
Software, in contrast to hardware, has the advantage that marginal cost only slightly increases with the quantity of products sold. This is the only leg up for software compared to hardware.
What I find strange in the software industry today, is the trend to increasingly include cloud services, or compute services in products where these might not be the core product. The main result is, that marginal cost increases in software products, diminishing the advantage of software products compared to hardware products.
This does not change the merits of companies like Apple, Microsoft and so on. However, I’d like to caution, to attribute the “low cyclicality, always growing”-advantage to software, even software subscription services as a hole. I’d attribute this advantage to a combination of the subscription/service fee model, combined with a moat or high switching cost and low marginal costs. Incidentally these are also attributes of most Apple- and Microsoft products.
I know Joe is joking, but it is hard to make money in the gaming space. It's super saturated. Even Joe knows this, as far as UA-cam is concerned finance is one of the most lucrative spaces as far as quality vs quantity (aka you don't need to make a video every day as opposed to gaming).
Now, to be fair, the easiest way to make money is a 9 to 5. But we are in the age of workers looking for meaning vs just a paycheck.
Oh! And the question of "how much money is enough" wasn't really answered.
When Joseph Carlson pulls up Cisco to compare Nvidia, I stop watching. Bye bye
Amazon's growth was too slow for me.. so I previously had to dump. So, my portfolio is currently +43.51% since starting 1/22/24.
I don't think nvidia is forcing the other big tech companies, they are trying to prevent buying and hoarding that's why they require they prove they have the data centers to occupy and use the chips.
From snippets and articles of interviews with Huang, I don't see Huang as the bullying type. He's more of a I'll be your friend and you scratch my back type😂😂
I've known about the Netflix Houses for months now from an article in a real estate journal talking about it while doing research on malls for my masters degree. I didn't think much of it and I am surprised people are hyping it up so much. It just seemed meh to me
I don't think this will every be a significant part of Netflix's future earnings
How does Nvidia transitioin to software by going into data centre business? By providing cloud services?
I'm really confused about this idea of "transition"... As if Nvidia hasn't done software for decades. They have CUDA (which allows general processing on GPUs) and Omniverse, and now have AI robotics and AI assistant NIMS. If you haven't seen their Omniverse Digital Twin programs you should. MASSIVE VALUE ADD...... and this is not new. CUDA was released in 2007 and Omniverse was released in 2021.
INTEL needs to catch-up to Nvidia in performance quickly, which I think they are not that far away...
😅😅Always love your sarcasm
There is other ChatGPT like LLMs in China, kid!